Zulfiqar Hussain IR 2019 NDU PRR.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Zulfiqar Hussain IR 2019 NDU PRR.Pdf THE DYNAMICS OF PAKISTAN-CHINA STRATEGIC RELATIONS: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS IN POST 9/11 ERA PhD DISSERTATION This Dissertation is submitted to National Defence University, Islamabad in partial fulfillment for the degree of PhD in International Relations By ZULFIQAR HUSSAIN NDU-IR/PhD-11/S-006 Supervisor DR. SHAHEEN AKHTAR Department of International Relations Faculty of Contemporary Studies National Defence University, Islamabad Pakistan, 2019 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to express entire gratitude to all, who directly or indirectly helped me to complete this research study. I feel pleasure to express my unsurmountable gratefulness to my research Supervisor, Dr. Shaheen Akhtar, whose sheer guidance made me assertive and independent researcher. I have no words to applaud my Supervisor‘s patience and constant guidance in finalization of this dissertation. Her devotion, intellect, professionalism and commitment would also be a source of enlightenment for my future. I am grateful to Dr. Hassan Askari Rizvi and Dr. Moonis Ahmar, renowned experts on national and regional security for their assiduous support and kind guidance during difficult times. I am grateful to Pakistan-China Relations Experts for their interviews at Quaid-e-Azam University, University of Sargodha, University of Karachi, Bahria University, Islamabad as well as National Defence University (NDU), Islamabad. I am thankful to my colleagues/researcher Arshid Farid Khan, Dr. Sajjad Malik and Mahmoor Ashraf Chaudhry for frequent discussions on various aspects of the thesis and their valuable suggestions at all junctures. I owe special thanks to the staff at the NDU library, the International Relations Department and the Dean‘s office for their relentless support round the clock. I also thank all teachers who helped me to reach at this point. I express warm recognition to Dr. Imran Ashraf, Assistant Professor, NDU for his valuable guidance and through reading of the relevant parts of study and helping me to further improve the final draft. I would like to thank Dr.Noorin Mujahid, Assistant Professor, Karachi University Dr.Shafei Moiz Hali, Assistant Professor, NDU and Ashafaq Ahmad, Assistant Professor Sargodha University for their cooperation. iv ABSTRACT The dynamics of Pakistan-China strategic relations are increasingly shaped by the global power play in Asia Pacific region which is emerging as a new pivot strategically and economically for the whole globe. China has remained most significant strategic ally of Pakistan and its relations have largely been driven by its strategic necessity to continue balance of power in region. The nuclearisation of India in South Asia and its strategic partnership with US and desire to play a soft balancer‘s role in Asia Pacific has accentuated Pakistan-China strategic relationship. Both neighboring states China and Pakistan has had expressed commonality of interests at bilateral, regional and international levels. At the bilateral level China perceives Pakistan as a viable corridor for energy resources from oil and gas rich Middle East in her regional as well as in global perspective. For Pakistan its strategic partnership with China has played very important role in country‘s security against her arch rival, the hegemonic India. The recently launched China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) would not only strengthen economic partnership but also create mutual strategic interdependence between the two neighboring states. Geopolitical scenario is getting more multifaceted with the passage of time with impending challenges and enormous opportunities. The study argues that the shifting structures of security in Asian Supercomplexare increasingly reinforcing the dynamics of Pakistan-China strategic relations in the twenty first century. Using the main framework of Regional Security Complex theory it examines the growing interplay of Asian Supercomplex with the South Asian Regional Security Complex which is marked by increased US-China strategic competition in Indo-Pacific region and China‘s Malacca dilemma as well as growing Indo-US strategic partnership in the region. In search of viable alternate energy routes, China has turned to Pakistan and initiated CPEC which will allow Beijing to use Gwadar port for transportation of Middle Eastern oil to Xinjiang through the pipeline. This has created a new set of strategic complex interdependence between Pakistan and China which is likely to sustain their strategic relationship in future. v. TABLES, FIGURES AND MAPS Tables 2.3 Types of security complex 87 3.2.2 CPEC Economic and Cumulative Dividends for Pakistan 140 Maps 2.4 Regional Security Complex in Asia during Cold War 88 2.4 Regional Security Complex in Asia Post-Cold War 89 3.1 Original See Route to China 109 3.2 Highway Network of CPEC 126 3.2 CPEC Three Alignments 133 vi. ACRONYMS AIIB Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank APEC Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation ARF ASEAN Regional Forum ASEM Asia-Europe Meeting BCIM-EC Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor BMD Ballistic Missiles Defence BRI Belt and Road Initiative BRICS Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa CBM Confidence Buildings Measure CCP Communist Party of China CEP circular error of probability CNEIC China Nuclear Energy Industry Corporation CNP Comprehensive National Power COD Commercial Operation Date CPEC China-Pakistan Economic Corridor CSA Currency Swap Agreement EAS East Asian Summit ETIM East Turkistan Islamic Movement EU European Union FC Financial Close FDI Foreign Direct Investment FDP Full Dialogue Partner FTA Free Trade Agreement HIT Heavy Industries Taxila HRF Heavy Rebuild Factory IPC Iran-Pakistan-China IR International Relations IS Islamic States JCC Joint Coordination Committee JeM Jaish-e-Mohammad JuD Jama‘ at udDawa KSEW Karachi Shipyard and Engineering Works LCA Light Combat Aircraft LEMOA Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement Let Lashkar-e-Taiba LOC Line of Control LPG Liquefied Natural Gas MBT Main Battle Tank MFN Most Favored Nation MOU Memorandum of Understanding MRBMS Solid Propellant Medium Range Ballistic Missiles MRBMS Solid Propellant Medium Range Ballistic Missiles NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization NDA National Democratic Alliance NDB New Development Bank NDRC National Development and Reforms Commission NDS National Defense Strategy NDU National Defence University NSA Non State Actors NSG Nuclear Supplier Group NSS National Security Strategy OBOR One Belt One Road PAC Pakistan Aeronautical Complex PBoC People‘s Bank of China QSD Quadrilateral Security Dialogue RMA Revolution for Military Affairs RSC Regional Security Complex RSCT Regional Security Complex Theory SAARC South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation SAFTA South Asian Free Trade Area SAIOR South Asia-Indian Ocean Region SBP State Bank of Pakistan SCO Shanghai Cooperation Organization SEZ Special Economic Zone SIPRI International Institute of Strategic Studies SLOC Sea Lane of Communications SPA Singapore Port Authority SPSRBM Solid Propellant Short Range Ballistic Missiles SREB Silk Road Economic Belt SSG Special Service Group TAC Treaty of Amity and Cooperation TAPI Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India TDAP Trading Development Authority of Pakistan TPP Trans Pacific Partnership UNSC United Nations Security Council WMD Weapons of Mass Destruction vii CONTENTS Acknowledgments iii Abstract iv Table, Figures and Maps v List of Acronyms vi INTRODUCTION 10 CHAPTER1: LITERATURE REVIEW 27 CHAPTER 2: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 65 2.1 Core Concept of Security 2.1 Regional Security 2.1.1 Security and Power Balancing 2.2 Regional Security Complex Theory 2.3 South Asian Security Complex to Asian Supercomplex 2.4 RSC Theory and Pakistan-China Strategic Relations CHAPTER3: REGIONAL SECURITY COMPLEX: BILATERAL DYNAMICS OF PAKISTAN-CHINA STRATEGIC RELATIONS 94 3.1: Dynamics of Security Cooperation 3.1.1 Conventional Security Cooperation 3.1.2 Civil Nuclear Cooperation 3.1.3 Maritime Security Cooperation 3.2 Dynamics of Economic Cooperation 3.2.1 Bilateral Trade & Investment 3.2.2 China-Pakistan Economic Corridor CHAPTER 4: SOUTH ASIAN REGIONAL SECURITY COMPLEX AND REGIONAL DYNAMICS OF PAKISTAN CHINA STRATEGIC RELATIONS 142 4.1 Pakistan‘s Security Dilemma in South Asia Regional Security Complex 4.2 China‘s Interests in South Asia and Pakistan‘s Role as Strategic Balancer CHAPTER 5: EMERGING ASIAN SUPERCOMPLEX AND DYNAMICS OF PAKISTAN CHINA STRATEGIC RELATIONS 174 5.1 Emerging Contours of Asian Supercomplex 5.2 Growing China and US Strategic Competition 5.3 India‘s Act East Policy and Sino-Indian Relations 5.4 American Factor in China-Indian Relations 5.5 Pakistan Factor in China-India relations CHAPTER 6: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS IN POST 9/11 ERA -ANALYSIS 210 6.1 China‘s Grand Strategy and Challenges to Beijing‘s Interests in Asian Supercomplex 6.2 Is India Emerging as a Counterweight to China in Asian Supercomplex? 6.3 Pakistan‘s Growing Strategic Value for China in Asian Supercomplex 6.4 China-India Growing Trade Relations and Pak-China Strategic Partnership 6.5 Continued Conflict in Afghanistan as a Challenge to Development of CPEC CONCLUSION 254 BIBLIOGRAPHY 270 INTRODUCTION Pakistan‘s national security has been a primary driver of its strategic relationship with China. The issue of territorial security has been at center of Pakistani policies due to the threat from India. Despite its best endeavors, the Western alliances of Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) and Central Treaty Organization (CENTO) could not provide the most needed security to Islamabad
Recommended publications
  • ARMOR Janfeb2007 Covers.Indd
    The Professional Bulletin of the Armor Branch PB 17-07-1 Editor in Chief Features LTC SHANE E. LEE 7 Not Quite Counterinsurgency: A Cautionary Tale for U.S. Forces Based on Israel’s Operation Change of Direction Managing Editor by Captain Daniel Helmer CHRISTY BOURGEOIS 12 Lebanon 2006: Did Merkava Challenge Its Match? by Lieutenant Colonel David Eshel, IDF, Retired Commandant 15 Teaching and Learning Counterinsurgency MG ROBERT M. WILLIAMS at the Armor Captains Career Course by Major John Grantz and Lieutenant Colonel John Nagl 18 The Challenge of Leadership ARMOR (ISSN 0004-2420) is published bi- during the Conduct of Counterinsurgency Operations month ly by the U.S. Army Armor Center, by Major Jon Dunn ATTN: ATZK-DAS-A, Building 1109A, 201 6th Avenue, Ste 373, Fort Knox, KY 40121-5721. 20 Building for the Future: Combined Arms Offi cers by Captain Chad Foster Disclaimer: The information contained in AR- MOR represents the professional opinions of 23 The Battalion Chaplain: A Combat Multiplier the authors and does not necessarily reflect by Chaplain (Captain) David Fell the official Army or TRADOC position, nor does it change or supersede any information 26 Practical Lessons from the Philippine Insurrection presented in other official Army publications. by Lieutenant Colonel Jayson A. Altieri, Lieutenant Commander John A. Cardillo, and Major William M. Stowe III Official distribution is limited to one copy for each armored brigade headquarters, ar mored 35 Integrating Cultural Sensitivity into Combat Operations cavalry regiment headquarters, armor battal- by Major Mark S. Leslie ion headquarters, armored cavalry squadron 39 Advice from a Former Military Transition Team Advisor head quarters, reconnaissance squadron head- by Major Jeff Weinhofer quar ters, armored cavalry troop, armor com- pany, and motorized brigade headquarters of 42 Arab Culture and History: Understanding is the First Key to Success the United States Army.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazilian Tanks British Tanks Canadian Tanks Chinese Tanks
    Tanks TANKS Brazilian Tanks British Tanks Canadian Tanks Chinese Tanks Croatian Tanks Czech Tanks Egyptian Tanks French Tanks German Tanks Indian Tanks Iranian Tanks Iraqi Tanks Israeli Tanks Italian Tanks Japanese Tanks Jordanian Tanks North Korean Tanks Pakistani Tanks Polish Tanks Romanian Tanks Russian Tanks Slovakian Tanks South African Tanks South Korean Tanks Spanish Tanks Swedish Tanks Swiss Tanks Ukrainian Tanks US Tanks file:///E/My%20Webs/tanks/tanks_2.html[3/22/2020 3:58:21 PM] Tanks Yugoslavian Tanks file:///E/My%20Webs/tanks/tanks_2.html[3/22/2020 3:58:21 PM] Brazilian Tanks EE-T1 Osorio Notes: In 1982, Engesa began the development of the EE-T1 main battle tank, and by 1985, it was ready for the world marketplace. The Engesa EE-T1 Osorio was a surprising development for Brazil – a tank that, while not in the class of the latest tanks of the time, one that was far above the league of the typical third-world offerings. In design, it was similar to many tanks of the time; this was not surprising, since Engesa had a lot of help from West German, British and French armor experts. The EE-T1 was very promising – an excellent design that several countries were very interested in. The Saudis in particular went as far as to place a pre- order of 318 for the Osorio. That deal, however, was essentially killed when the Saudis saw the incredible performance of the M-1 Abrams and the British Challenger, and they literally cancelled the Osorio order at the last moment. This resulted in the cancellation of demonstrations to other countries, the demise of Engesa, and with it a promising medium tank.
    [Show full text]
  • T 80 Standard Tank
    T80 STANDARD TANK The Soviet Army’s Last Armored Champion STEVEN J ZALOGA ILLUSTRATED BY TONY BRYAN © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com NEW VANGUARD • 152 T80 STANDARD TANK The Soviet Army’s Last Armored Champion STEVEN J ZALOGA ILLUSTRATED BY TONY BRYAN © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 ORIGINS 4 • New Medium Tank for the 1980s • The Turbine Option • Obiekt 219 THE T80B 12 • Reactive Armor: the T-80BV SUPERTOUGH: THE T80U 19 • Back To The Diesel: the Kharkov T-80UD T80 AT THE CROSSROADS: THE SOVIET COLLAPSE 28 ACTIVE PROTECTION 35 THE UKRAINIAN T84 38 T80 FOLLOWON TANKS 43 • Specialized T-80 Derivatives FURTHER READING 46 GLOSSARY 47 INDEX 48 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com T80 STANDARD TANK THE SOVIET ARMY’S LAST ARMORED CHAMPION INTRODUCTION The T-80 tank was meant to be the ultimate Soviet main battle tank (MBT), entering the Soviet arsenal around the same time as the new NATO- generation American M1 Abrams, British Challenger, and German Leopard 2. It was not a new design, but rather an evolutionary reconsideration of the T-64A tank. In the event, the T-80 proved to be deeply troubled, offering modest advances over the existing T-64A and T-72 tanks, yet being considerably more costly due to the use of a powerful but thirsty gas-turbine engine. After the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, there was fierce competition between surviving tank plants to win the contracts for a standard tank for the new Russian Army, and the rival T-90 was selected as the next Russian tank.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Equipment Guide
    WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT GUIDE TRADOC DCSINT Threat Support Directorate DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Worldwide Equipment Guide Sep 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Page Memorandum, 24 Sep 2001 ...................................... *i V-150................................................................. 2-12 Introduction ............................................................ *vii VTT-323 ......................................................... 2-12.1 Table: Units of Measure........................................... ix WZ 551........................................................... 2-12.2 Errata Notes................................................................ x YW 531A/531C/Type 63 Vehicle Series........... 2-13 Supplement Page Changes.................................... *xiii YW 531H/Type 85 Vehicle Series ................... 2-14 1. INFANTRY WEAPONS ................................... 1-1 Infantry Fighting Vehicles AMX-10P IFV................................................... 2-15 Small Arms BMD-1 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-17 AK-74 5.45-mm Assault Rifle ............................. 1-3 BMD-3 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-19 RPK-74 5.45-mm Light Machinegun................... 1-4 BMP-1 IFV..................................................... 2-20.1 AK-47 7.62-mm Assault Rifle .......................... 1-4.1 BMP-1P IFV...................................................... 2-21 Sniper Rifles.....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shared with the DRDO Its Notion of What Design Features and Performance It Would Like
    Occasional Paper ISSUE NO. 324 JULY 2021 © 2021 Observer Research Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied, archived, retained or transmitted through print, speech or electronic media without prior written approval from ORF. Light Tanks: A Missing Priority for the Indian Army Kartik Bommakanti Abstract The Indian Army’s (IA) difficulties with regard to the acquisition of light tanks are as much self-inflicted as they are a product of fiscal constraints. The Army has exerted only half-hearted efforts in developing its light-armoured capabilities—inconsistent with current Army doctrine and in disregard of history. Indeed, the IA has used light armour in high-altitude operations in the past. This paper argues that the IA is hobbled by an infantry-oriented mindset that does not allow for other areas of force development such as a light-tank capability. Attribution: Kartik Bommakanti, “Light Tanks: A Missing Priority for the Indian Army,” ORF Occasional Paper No. 324, July 2021, Observer Research Foundation. ndia remains locked in boundary tensions with the People’s Republic of China (PRC), and although these crises have momentarily abated, India would need to seriously address the gaps in its ground armour against the PRC. The Indian Army (IA) has been historically biased in favour of medium- and Iheavyweight tanks, and there is an absence of a significant or at least a consequential light-tank component in its armoured corps. The IA’s predilection for medium and heavy tanks is largely due to the service’s preoccupation with India’s foe on its western border—i.e., Pakistan.
    [Show full text]
  • And Radio Communication in Tank T-72
    A Report on Automatic Loading Gear (ALG) and Radio Communication in Tank T-72 By- Name of Students ID nos. Rudresh Gupta 2016A3PS0160G Jaskirat Singh Chhabra 2016A3PS0155G Vasu Gupta 2016A3PS0153G Dhruv Sharma 2016A8PS0371G Akanksha Singh 2016A8B30261G AT 505 ARMY BASE WORKSHOP, NEW DELHI Practice School – I station of BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCE, PILANI (MAY-JULY, 2018) BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCE PILANI (RAJASTHAN) Practice School Division Station: NEW DELHI Centre: 505 ARMY BASE WORKSHOP Duration: 8 WEEKS Date of Start: 22/05/2018 Date of submission: 13/07/18 Title of the project: 1) Auto-Loading Gear (ALG) in tank T-72 2) Radio Communication in tank T-72 Name of Students ID nos. Discipline Rudresh Gupta 2016A3PS0160G EEE Jaskirat Singh Chhabra 2016A3PS0155G EEE Vasu Gupta 2016A3PS0153G EEE Dhruv Sharma 2016A8PS0371G ENI Akanksha Singh 2016A8B30261G ENI Name and Designation of the expert: Sh. Kshitij Gupta, DGM (TEG) Name of the PS faculty: Dr. Nirankush Dutta Keywords: Tanks, ALG, KR-175, K1-M, Testing Jig, Amplifiers, Relays, Contactors. Project Areas: Electronics of the ALG system Abstract: The project is a detailed study and practical analysis of Auto-Loading Gear in tanks proposing improvements and possible changes, thereby reducing manual effort. Signature of student(s) Signature of Supervisor Date : Date : ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We wish to express our sincere gratitude to Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani for providing us the opportunity to do our internship and project work in “505 ARMY BASE WORKSHOP, New Delhi.” We sincerely thank Sh. Kshitij Gupta, DGM (TEG) for his guidance and encouragement in carrying out this project work.
    [Show full text]
  • REGIONAL MAIN BATTLE TANK PROGRAMMES Gordon Arthur / Hong Kong
    MBTs “TANKED UP” – REGIONAL MAIN BATTLE TANK PROGRAMMES Gordon Arthur / Hong Kong p until recently there were some III proved totally inadequate when dealing with time. In terms of MBT production, the Chinese commentators, and even some thick mud walls in Afghanistan, plus the MBT ZTZ99 and ZTZ96, Indian T-90S and Pakistani militaries, who predicted the offers better mobility than wheeled vehicles in Al-Khalid are dominating international markets, days of the main battle tank soft terrain and when negotiating watercourses. calculated to account for 60.38% of all new (MBT) were numbered. A classic Furthermore, the heavier armour of the Leopard production through till 2017. example is Canada, which decided to retire offers better protection against improvised Uits tank fleet and instead rely on LAV III 8x8 explosive devices (IED), the insurgent weapon of EAST ASIA armoured vehicles. A Mobile Gun System (MGS) choice. Technologically advanced Japan has forged its variant armed with a 105mm gun was to take on The fact that several countries (Canada, own path in MBT production. In service are the the ‘quasi-tank’ role. However, counterinsurgency Denmark and USA) have deployed MBTs Type 74 and Type 90, products of a bygone Cold operations in Afghanistan caused a swift about- to Afghanistan – a country with notoriously War era. Japan inducted 341 Type 90 MBTs, face, with Canada despatching Leopard C2 tanks challenging tank terrain – shows these are still but one disadvantage is its strategic mobility/ to the land-locked country in October 2006. viable military weapon systems. Asia’s love affair transportability in the small and crowded country.
    [Show full text]
  • Excalibur Army Product Catalog
    EN VEHICLES MILITARY MILITARY VEHICLES www.excaliburarmy.cz 1 OUR MISSION 04-05 GUNS AND AMMUNITION 68-85 MAIN BATTLE TANKS 06-13 ASSAULT RIFLES ACCESSORIES T-72 SCARAB MACHINE GUNS T-72 HEAVY MACHINE GUNS T-55 MEDIUM CALIBRE GUNS SELF-PROPELLED HOWITZERS 14-19 LARGE CALIBRE GUNS AMMUNITION DANA M2 DANA vz. 77 ENGINES AND SPARE PARTS 86-99 MULTIPLE LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEMS 20-31 ENGINE UTD-20 ENGINE UTD-29 FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM AND AIMING SYSTEM ENGINE V-6M RM-70 VAMPIRE 4D 8X8 ENGINE V-55 AM2 RM-70 M1 8X8 ENGINE TE 2T 1050 BM-21 MT 4X4 ENGINE V-46.6 BM-21 MU ENGINE V-55A ENGINE V-6-P1 ENGINE KAMAZ 7401 ARMOURED PERSONNEL CARRIERS ENGINE JAMZ-238N ENGINE V-6M-K37 AND INFANTRY FIGHTING VEHICLES 32-47 ENGINE V-84 ENGINE T3C-930-50-600K PATRIOT II. PATRIOT 100-101 PANDUR II 8×8 COMPANY HISTORY AND SERVICES BMP / MEXCA BMP-1 OT-64 / SKOT BRDM-2 MILITARY ENGINEERING VEHICLES 48-67 AM-70 EX / BRIDGE LAYER AM-50 EX / BRIDGE LAYER TREVA-15 / RECOVERY VEHICLE AV-15 / RECOVERY VEHICLE VT-55A / RECOVERY TANK TMVA DECON-17 EX / DECONTAMINATION VEHICLE UDS-214 / MULTI-PURPOSE TELESCOPIC EXCAVATOR POSEIDON PS4W / WATER TREATMENT CONTAINER UNIT TATRA T 815-7 / UNIVERSAL PLATFORM 3 We believe in a peaceful world where people are free to live by their traditions and feel safe so they can live to the full extent of their dreams. Yet freedom and security are values that need to be protected. EXCALIBUR ARMY designs, develops and produces a wide range of military vehicles and equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CANADIAN ARMY TROPHY Achieving Excellence in Tank Gunnery
    THE CANADIAN ARMY TROPHY Achieving Excellence in Tank Gunnery Robert S. Cameron, Ph.D. About the Cover The cover shows the special logo developed for the Canadian Army Trophy, indicating the com- petition range and year. The six national flags represent the participating nations. The inner circle includes the insignia for HQ AFCENT flanked by CENTAG on the left and NORTHAG on the right, all superimposed over a maple leaf symbolizing the competition’s Canadian origins. (Ron Mihalko) THE CANADIAN ARMY TROPHY Achieving Excellence in Tank Gunnery Robert S. Cameron, Ph.D. U.S. Army Armor Branch Historian U.S. Army Armor School Fort Benning, Georgia 31905 iii iii iv iv Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward iii Introduction xi Chapter 1: The Early Years of the Canadian Army Trophy, 1963-1968 1 Evolving U.S. and NATO Policy 1 Competition Origins 3 CAT in the 1960s 5 Belgium’s American Cast-off 6 The German Armored Force Comes of Age 8 British Centurions 13 The Canadian Experience 15 The Netherlands 16 Whither the Americans? 17 Changing CAT 20 Chapter 2: Improving the Canadian Army Trophy, 1970-1979 25 NATO Developments 25 Updating CAT 28 Rule Britannia in 1970 29 The Doldrums of 1973 and 1975 33 Upping the Ante 37 O Canada in 1977 37 CAT 1979 44 The American Thunderbolt in Disarray 48 Reforging the Thunderbolt 53 Chapter 3: The Canadian Army Trophy in the Spotlight, 1981-1985 67 Cold War Background 67 Rules and Conditions 69 National Preparations 71 CAT 1981 75 Preparing for CAT 1983 79 CAT 1983 81 The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Foreign Counterparts of U.S. Army Ground Combat Systems and Implications for Combat Operations and Modernization
    Selected Foreign Counterparts of U.S. Army Ground Combat Systems and Implications for Combat Operations and Modernization Andrew Feickert Specialist in Military Ground Forces January 18, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44741 Selected Foreign Counterparts of U.S. Army Ground Combat Systems and Implications f Summary Many nations maintain armies whose ultimate responsibility is to defeat other nations’ combat formations on the battlefield. In order to accomplish this, nations indigenously develop, maintain, and improve a variety of ground combat systems or purchase them from other nations. Ground combat system development and improvement is informed by existing and emerging technologies and budgetary factors as well as observations from current land conflicts. As this process is also intended to address potential future battlefield threats, beliefs as to what the future combat operational environment will look like, as well as what future technologies might be available for military use, also influence a nation’s developmental efforts. The U.S. Army’s current fleet of main battle tanks (MBTs), tracked infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs), tracked self-propelled (SP) artillery, and multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS), which constitutes the nucleus of the Army’s armored ground forces, were developed in the 1970s and fielded in the 1980s to counter the Soviet Union’s and Warsaw Pact’s numerically superior ground forces. The combat performance of these vehicles against Iraqi forces during Operation Desert Storm in 1991
    [Show full text]
  • Red Diamond OCT DEC 19
    Operational Environment & Threat Analysis Volume 10, Issue 4 October - December 2019 Russia’s Arctic Army The SU-57 Also: TV Show Review & Worldwide Equipment Guide (WEG) Russia in Africa Showcase and Updates APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED OEE Red Diamond published by TRADOC G-2 Operational INSIDE THIS ISSUE Environment & Threat Analysis Directorate, Fort Leavenworth, KS Russia’s Arctic Army ................................................ 3 Topic Inquiries: Angela Williams (DAC), Branch Chief, Training & Support Jennifer Dunn (DAC), Branch Chief, Analysis & Production Russia in Africa ..................................................... 14 OE&TA Staff: Operational Enviroment Mapping Series: Greater Caucasus ................................................. 17 Penny Mellies (DAC) Director, OE&TA [email protected] 913-684-7920 MAJ Megan Williams MP LO Maneuver Defense: Battalion Tactical Group (BTG).. 19 [email protected] 913-684-7944 WO2 Rob Whalley UK LO The SU-57: Challenges and Changes for Russia in a [email protected] 913-684-7994 Multi-Polar World.................................................. 28 Paula Devers (DAC) Intelligence Specialist [email protected] 913-684-7907 Replicating Russian Disinformation & Deception in Laura Deatrick (CTR) Editor Training ............................................................... 38 [email protected] 913-684-7925 Keith French (CTR) Geospatial Analyst Russian Crime: The Simmering Threat ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Project Manager Heavy Brigade Combat Team (PM HBCT) Product
    PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE GROUND COMBAT SYSTEMS Program Executive Office Ground Com- bat Systems (PEO GCS) manages the de- velopment, systems integration, acquisi- tion, testing, fielding, modernization, and sustainment of the U.S. Army’s ground combat systems to provide world-class, af- fordable and relevant capabilities to our soldiers and marines. Systems include the Abrams main battle tank, Bradley family of vehicles (FoV), self-propelled howitzers, Armored Knight FoV, M113 armored per- sonnel carrier, M88 Hercules, armored multi-purpose vehicle, Stryker FoV, ground M1A2 Abrams tank combat vehicle, robotics and unmanned ground systems. PEO GCS operates with a multibillion-dollar annual budget and re- tains more than 1,200 military and civilian employees including three board-selected Army project managers and one Marine Corps joint project manager. Project Manager Heavy Brigade Combat Team (PM HBCT) The Project Manager Heavy Brigade Combat Team (PM HBCT) serves as the life-cycle manager for the Army’s heavy combat vehicles including the Abrams tank, M88 Hercules, Bradley fighting vehi- cle, M113 armored personnel carrier, Pal- adin, field artillery ammunition supply ve- hicle (FAASV), armored multi-purpose vehicle, and Armored Knight FoV. Product Manager Abrams The Abrams Tank provides soldiers with the mobility, firepower and shock effect to successfully close in and destroy enemy forces on the complex, integrated battle- field. It is the only weapon system that can withstand the impact of high-energy war- heads and remain lethal in full spectrum operations. The 120 mm main gun on the M1A1 and M1A2 SEPv2, combined with the powerful 1,500-hp turbine engine and special armor, make the Abrams tank suit- able for attacking or defending against large concentrations of heavy armor forces on a highly lethal battlefield and for roles that require shock effect, wide-area sur- veillance, combined arms maneuver, and mobile direct firepower to support Army mission requirements.
    [Show full text]