Call to Action Here
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
How Attorneys Judge Collegiate Mock Trials Ruth R
Speaker & Gavel Volume 49 | Issue 1 Article 4 January 2012 How Attorneys Judge Collegiate Mock Trials Ruth R. Wagoner Bellarmine University, [email protected] R. Adam Molnar Bellarmine University Follow this and additional works at: http://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/speaker-gavel Part of the Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Wagoner, R., & Molnar, R. A. (2012). How Attorneys Judge Collegiate Mock Trials. Speaker & Gavel, 49(1), 42-54. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. It has been accepted for inclusion in Speaker & Gavel by an authorized administrator of Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. Wagoner and Molnar: How Attorneys Judge Collegiate Mock Trials 42 Speaker & Gavel 2012 How Attorneys Judge Collegiate Mock Trials Ruth R. Wagoner & R. Adam Molnar Abstract In collegiate mock trial competition, practicing attorneys who don’t coach or know the participating schools judge the students' persuasive skill. Fifty-six attorneys were interviewed after they judged collegiate mock trials. They were asked which student behaviors they rewarded, which behaviors they punished, and overall which team presented more effectively. The attorneys' responses were grouped into thematic categories and arranged by priorities. Attorneys were consistent in what they said they valued in student performances. Inter- viewees' answers to the question about overall team performance were compared with the numeric ballots. If global assessment were included, it would change the outcome of a substantial number of trials, which raises the question if such an item would have the same effect on any graded competition. -
IOWA LAWYER CONTENTS Volume 66 Number 6 June 2006 President’S Letter: Sail Away – Salvo
IOWAIOWATHETHE LAWYER LAWYERVVolumeolume 66 Number 6 June 2006 Marion Beatty takes leadership reins June 22 ALSO IN THIS ISSUE – Iowa team wins high school mock trial national championship – ISBA endorses new professional liability insurance broker – New attorneys join Iowa legal ranks – Arbitrating employment claims: Watch out for these traps – Improving access to justice THE IOWA LAWYER CONTENTS Volume 66 Number 6 June 2006 President’s Letter: Sail away – Salvo . 5 to justice – Toresdahl . 14 Published at 521 East Locust Marion Beatty takes leadership reins . 7 Amendments to articles of incorporation 15 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Special welcome (photo) . 9 Ag law website available . 16 Steve Boeckman, Editor Iowa’s Valley High School wins College Mock Trial tournament 515-243-3179 national title . 10 – Hoffman-Simanek . 17 ISBA endorses new professional YLD President’s Letter – Preston . 18 liability broker . 11 Leadership Circle . 19 Bridge the Gap prize winners (photo) . 12 Transitions . 20 Law Day activity (photo) . 13 Annual Report to members . Centerspread THE IOWA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION Seventy eight new attorneys join ranks . 13 CLE calendar . 45 OFFICERS 2004-2005 Taking steps to improve access Watch out for these traps in President, J. C. Salvo employment law – Harty . 53 President-elect, Marion Beatty Vice President, Joel Greer Around the Bar Immediate Past President, Nicholas Critelli, Jr. Dinner honors Streits . 54 Executive Director, Dwight Dinkla Canadian Consulate pays a visit (photo) 55 Blink THE IOWA LAWYER On shutting it out – . 56 (ISSN 1052-5327) is published monthly by The Iowa State Classified Ads . 57 Bar Association, 521 East Locust, Des Moines, Iowa 50309. -
Caroline W. "Carrie" Stanton Partner Charlottesville, VA P: 434.951.5708 P: 804.420.6611 F: 434.817.0977 [email protected]
Caroline W. "Carrie" Stanton Partner Charlottesville, VA P: 434.951.5708 P: 804.420.6611 F: 434.817.0977 [email protected] Carrie Stanton represents businesses in major corporate transactions, including mergers and acquisitions and capital raising as well as complex commercial contracts and corporate governance matters. She represents clients from a broad range of industries, including insurance, retail, manufacturing, technology, transportation, health care, engineering, startups and venture capitalists at various stages of a transaction. Carrie’s goals are to help her clients achieve their business objectives, identify opportunities and mitigate risks while providing excellent client service and promoting efficiency. In that vein, she is embedded in the firm’s effort to help in-house legal departments meet overflow needs at all stages of commercial contract negotiations. She often serves as the firm’s single point of contact for a client, becoming an integrated resource to provide insight on best practices and connect the client to the firm’s full range of legal services. Carrie is thorough and attentive, and she is enthusiastic in assisting clients in establishing and working toward their goals. She has been named to Virginia Lawyers Weekly's class of "Up & Coming Lawyers" (2019), in Virginia Super Lawyers Rising Stars (2013-present) for Business and Corporate Law and in The Best Lawyers in America© (2021). Carrie is a member of the Virginia Bar Association, Richmond Bar Association and Charlottesville-Albemarle Bar Association. She also serves on the American Bar Association Law Practice Division's Attorney Well-Being Committee. In the community, Carrie is a member of the executive board of directors for the United Way of Greater Charlottesville and was a member of the Leadership Charlottesville 2014 class. -
Steps in a Mock Trial
STEPS IN A MOCK TRIAL 1. The Opening of the Court Either the Clerk of the Court of the judge will call the Court to order. When the judge enters, all the participants should remain standing until the judge is seated. The case will be announced, i.e., "The Court will now hear the case of vs. ." The judge will then ask the attorney for each side if they are ready. A representative of each team will introduce and identify each member of the team and the role each will play. 2. Opening Statement (1) Prosecution (in criminal cases) Plaintiff (in civil cases) The prosecutor in a criminal case (or plaintiff' s attorney in a civil case) summarizes the evidence which will be presented to prove the case. (2) Defendant (in criminal or civil case) The defendant' s attorney in a criminal or civil case summarizes the evidence for the Court which will be presented to rebut the case the prosecution has made. 3. Direct Examination by Plaintiff The prosecutors (plaintiff' s attorneys) conduct the direct examination of its own witnesses. At this time, testimony and other evidence to prove the prosecution' s (plaintiff' s) case will be represented. The purpose of direct examination is to allow the witness to state the facts in support of the case. Note: The attorneys for both sides, on both direct and cross examination, should remember that their only function is to ask questions; attorneys themselves may not testify or give evidence, and they must avoid phrasing questions in a way that might violate this rule. -
Letter to the Editor: Terrorism — Why Turkey? “Santa Goes Sadistic”
Virginia Law Weekly Friday, December 5, 2003Student Life 3 Letter to the Editor: Terrorism — Why Turkey? Faculty Quotes To the Editor: was simply a proxy. Nothing could pean Union membership. In short, this new type of terrorism. As far as J. Harrison: “What the court Over the past few weeks, we be further away from the truth. Turkey is the model of modernity Turkish secularism and democracy does here is open door number have had the opportunity to talk to Upon reflection, Turks and in- for 1.3 billion Muslims worldwide. are concerned, fear not. The Turk- three, and it’s saying, ‘behind door members of the Law School com- formed observers know the answer It is a model that proves there is no ish people have enjoyed both for too number three is a goat, so you go munity about the recent terrorist to the question “Why Turkey?”: The inherent conflict between Islam and long to let them go. But we need to jail.’ They are telling people attacks in Istanbul. All of our attacks target the functioning of a a Western-style democracy. It is help. Similar to September 11, the that the goat was always there, friends and family members are Western-style democracy in a pre- this model that the Bin Ladins of threat comes from a vast and highly and now they’re just opening the safe and well. Many thanks to ev- dominantly Muslim country. These the world want to see fail. organized global network of terror- door and showing it to us.” eryone who expressed their con- terrorists believe that by inflicting Turkey is where the East and ists. -
Minneapolis, Minnesota Regional Tournament February 1-3, 2013 Hosted by Hamline University Official Tabulation Room Summary
AMERICAN MOCK TRIAL ASSOCIATION Minneapolis, Minnesota Regional Tournament February 1-3, 2013 Hosted by Hamline University Official Tabulation Room Summary Team/School Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Summary 1010 ! v. 1136 " v. 1334 " v. 1409 ! v. 1148 6 - 2 - 0 Univ. of Wisconsin Superior W W W W W L L W CS OCS PD 13 12 30 17 7 -15 -8 7 16 78 63 1011 ! v. 1086 " v. 1625 ! v. 1601 " v. 1347 3 - 5 - 0 Univ. of Wisconsin Superior L L W L L L W W CS OCS PD -6 -11 3 -4 -13 -13 10 14 13.5 61 -20 1065 " v. 1235 ! v. 1148 ! v. 1625 " v. 1174 3 - 5 - 0 St. Norbert College L L W L W W L L CS OCS PD -18 -12 6 -7 14 34 -3 -9 13 65 5 1066 ! v. 1334 " v. 1136 ! v. 1347 " v. 1625 3 - 5 - 0 St. Norbert College L L L L L W W W CS OCS PD -7 -1 -27 -13 -7 8 20 23 8 67.5 -4 1086 " v. 1011 ! v. 1587 " v. 1532 ! v. 1600 7 - 0 - 1 Macalester College W W T W W W W W CS OCS PD 6 11 0 5 11 8 5 3 16.5 65 49 1087 " v. 1148 ! v. 1235 " v. 1600 ! v. 1334 6 - 1 - 1 Macalester College W W W W T L W W CS OCS PD 11 15 8 1 0 -8 20 5 15.5 75.5 52 1136 " v. -
2015 Annual Report
United States District Court District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands 2nd Floor, Horiguchi Building 123 Kopa Di Oru St., Beach Road, Garapan Saipan, MP 96950 2015 ANNUAL United States District Court DISTRICT REPORT District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands 2nd Floor, Horiguchi Building 123 Kopa Di Oru St. • Beach Road, Garapan • Saipan, MP 96950 Telephone: (670) 237‐1200 • Facsimile: (670) 237‐1201 Internet Address: hp://www.nmid.uscourts.gov February 6, 2016 16 2016 Ninth Circuit Civics Contest: The NMI District Court and the Ninth FOREWORD Circuit courts and Community Commiee is sponsoring an essay and video contest for high school students in the NMI. C J The NMI District Court will conduct preliminary judging for the contest. The top three finishers in the essay and video R V. M compeons at the district level will go on to compete in the Ninth Circuit contest. To be eligible students must reside in the NMI. More informaon on the contest is available at: The release of this annual report to coincide with the yearly district court hp://www.cap9.uscourts.gov/civicscontest conference provides an opportunity to reflect on last year’s district conference as well as the challenges and the achievements of the court from February 2015 through January 2016. Last February’s conference, entled “Warriors or Lawyers? Ethics and Professionalism,” focused on how lawyers can maintain a high standard of ethical pracce while vigorously advocang for their clients’ interests. The Honorable M. Margaret McKeown of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals examined the process of achieving the client’s goals ethically from the UPDATE ON THE NEW COURTHOUSE perspecves of the bench and the bar, and gave a lively presentaon on the On June 29, 2015, the General Services Administraon (GSA) announced the ethical pialls for lawyers and judges using social media. -
Virginia Law Weekly, Friday, October 16, 1970
2 VIRGINIA LAW WEEKLY, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 16, 1970 DICTA Cite as "Van Clief, VIRGINIA LAW WEEKLY, DICTA, Vol. XXIII, No. 5 (1970)" 7 C/wr/ofCst,/le, / Y/flid,he 6dOrd IMue (Continued from Page 1) frdmurd/ foo/bd/ lln17ds suffered d humi/hhg defea o/ecl bernds of ihee nw innumerable problems of financial, mechanical, and person- MM// nr/llodhall/edmn1t fr TWELVE nel adjustment - even to the extent of closing their busi- CONSECUTIVE YEARS! nesses. Naturally, they practically always feel at first that the legislation is unnecessary, discriminatory and serves no AI /6/,cowevet- c&clrd kAue did I /lec'St VIRGINIA LAW WEEKLY score 6houchdown - ike £cfi/egkly Iedm, real purpose. these diametrically opposed positions stem a num- MANAGING BOARD I ilk/cgIhe Firs a/ lP/es crer, /efi IMe From RICHARD A. MCKITTRICK Pdy/MO9 Ic/, dnod FOUR DOJANS tATER ber of arguments, both pro and con. Further, the affected Editor iaurd l/e SCOR(D A TO'CHDOWN!/ parties attempt to engage in delaying tactics, while the THOMAS M. BOYD WILLIAM P. BOSWELL Associate Edtor Managing Editor proponents will call for even more haste. The chief patron RODHAMT. DELK JR. X C6.Dick 1HOwrd, d5//MV~o of a bill of this type is immediately caught in a giant vise Business Manager emlye' es a Io,w Proessor c-i V lV. LameShoo/, Acs heem of rhetoric-some fact and some fiction, mostly opinion. EDITORIAL BOARD Se /EFcYkyoieV b9,RbC/s The legislative process is fortunately so constructed that all E ditor RICHARD A . M CKITTRICK ....................................................................................... -
Dickman, Mers Win Lile
VIRGINIA LAW WEEKLY 2017, 2018, & 2019 ABA Law Student Division Best Newspaper Award-Winner A Look Law Weekly’s Guide to PILA Auction.................................2 Alumnae Talk Pursuing Public Service Careers..................3 Inside: Pav Fire Alarm: A Poem in Six Stanzas...............................5 Wednesday, 6 November 2019 The Newspaper of the University of Virginia School of Law Since 1948 Volume 72, Number 10 1L, 2L, 3L around north Exper- grounds Dickman, Thumbs down iences: to Fall Back. ANG knows it’s Halloween not worth it to trade an hour of extra Roundup sleep for four months of SAD. And anyone who Ben Stievater ’22 Mers Win Lile Staff Editor thinks otherwise is too Sam Pickett ’21 Thornhill Wins Best Oralist bad at negotiating to News Editor 1Hell of a Halloween make it in the legal pro- Despite the actual pass- fession. ing of Halloween (making it legally Christmastime, Thumbs up pursuant to the controver- to Chipotle for sial, landmark decision in honoring ANG’s Thanksgiving v. Target, “tired law stu- 456 U.S. 293 (1997)), Friday dent” costume. ANG is night was peak ~Spooky proud that their normal Szn~ for 1Ls. Before head- decrepit look finally was ing to Bar Review and the recognized by someone as Gunners’ performance at a positive. Boylan, most of us flocked in droves to a pregame Thumbs down appropriately entitled to undergrad “Welcome to 1Hell,” the student orga- brainchild of Christina Kelly nizations for ’22 and Chance Maginness selling undersized baked ’22. Host Marcello Kilani goods for oversized prices ’22 generously provided the after Bar Review. -
Bylaws University of Virginia School of Law Student Bar
BYLAWS of the UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW STUDENT BAR ASSOCIATION Amended and restated as of July 15, 2020 AS ADOPTED ON MARCH 19, 2007 Article I: APPLICABILITY Section 1. Applicable to all Student Bar Association Officers. These Bylaws shall apply to all elected and appointed Officers and members of the University of Virginia School of Law Student Bar Association (“SBA”), as defined in the SBA Constitution. Section 2. Governing Rules. Except as otherwise provided in the Constitution or these Bylaws, the SBA shall be governed by Robert’s Rules of Order, Newly Revised. However, to the extent possible, clear communication and effective decision-making should be prioritized over strict adherence to Robert’s Rules of Order, Newly Revised. Section 3. Suspension. A majority vote of the Voting Members shall be necessary to suspend subparts of the Bylaws or the Bylaws in their entirety. The Bylaws may contain provisions prohibiting the suspension of specific portions of the Bylaws. Section 4. Amendment. A. Form. Proposed amendments to the Bylaws must be made in writing. B. Notice and Comment. Upon formal submission of a proposed amendment, the SBA shall provide for at least a forty-eight-hour public notice and comment period for the proposed changes. For the purposes of this section, public notice shall mean publishing the proposed changes to the school. The forty-eight-hour period will toll for the entirety of Fall Break, Winter Break, J-Term, and Spring Break. C. Voting. The Bylaws may be amended by a sixty percent of the Voting Members. Votes may be cast remotely and by proxy. -
The American Mock Trial Association New Team Handbook Online Version
The American Mock Trial Association New Team Handbook Online Version (for 2020-21) 2 Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 3 a. Mock Trial………………………………………………………………… 4 b. Intercollegiate Mock Trial………………………………………………… 4 c. Benefits of Mock Trial……………………………………………………. 5 Chapter 1: Starting a Team……………………………………………………………. 7 a. University Support ………………………………………………………… 7 b. AMTA Registration ……………………………………………………….. 7 c. Recruiting Team Members…………………………………………………. 8 d. Budgeting and Fundraising………………………………………………… 8 e. Coaching…………………………………………………………………… 9 f. Structure……………………………………………………………………. 9 g. Scheduling and Preparation………………………………………………… 10 h. Course Credit…………………………………………………………… 10 Chapter 2: Summary of AMTA Competition Rules…………………………………… 13 a. Tournaments………………………………………………………………… 13 b. People at a Tournament……………………………………………………... 14 c. Trial Roles: Attorneys, Witnesses, Timekeepers…………………………… 15 d. Tournament Structure………………………………………………………. 18 Chapter 3: Practicing for Competition………………………………………………… 26 a. Accessing the Case Material……………………………………………….. 26 b. Parts of the Case…………………………………………………………… 26 c. Reading the Case: Developing a Theory and Theme……………………… 28 d. Selecting Witnesses………………………………………………………… 31 e. Practicing…………………………………………………………………… 31 f. Public Speaking……………………………………………………………. 32 g. Spirit of AMTA……………………………………………………………. 33 Chapter 4: Trial Skills…………………………………………………………………. 34 a. Pretrial……………………………………………………………………… 34 b. Opening Statement…………………………………………………………. 34 c. Direct Examination………………………………………………………… -
8 University of Virginia School of Law
RANK 8 University of Virginia School of Law MAILING ADDRESS1-4 REGISTRAR’S PHONE 580 Massie Road 434-924-4122 Charlottesville, VA 22903-1738 ADMISSIONS PHONE MAIN PHONE 434-924-7351 (434) 924-7354 CAREER SERVICES PHONE WEBSITE 434-924-7349 www.law.virginia.edu Overview5 Founded by Thomas Jefferson in 1819, the University Of Virginia School Of Law is a world-renowned training ground for distinguished lawyers and public servants. Consistently ranked among the top law schools in the nation, Virginia has educated generations of lawyers, instilling in them a commitment to leadership, integrity and community service. Virginia is justly famous for its collegial environment that bonds students and faculty, and student satisfaction is consistently cited as among the highest in American law schools. At Virginia, law students share their experiences in a cooperative spirit, both in and out of the classroom, and build a network that lasts well beyond their three years here. Student-Faculty Ratio6 11.3:1 Admission Criteria7 LSAT GPA 25th–75th Percentile 164-170 3.52-3.94 Median* 169 3.87 Law School Admissions details based on 2013 data. *Medians have been calculated by averaging the 25th- and 75th-percentile values released by the law schools and have been rounded up to the nearest whole number for LSAT scores and to the nearest one-hundredth for GPAs. THE 2016 BCG ATTORNEY SEARCH GUIDE TO AMERICA’S TOP 50 LAW SCHOOLS 1 Admission Statistics7 Approximate number of applications 6048 Number accepted 1071 Acceptance rate 17.7% The above admission details are based on 2013 data.