DOCSLIB.ORG

TMS-MC-015 Revision 30 Page 2 of 104 01 April 2016 * REVISED ** ADDED ______

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TMS-MC-015 Revision 30 Page 2 of 104 01 April 2016 * REVISED ** ADDED ______ Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Supplier Tooling Manual (Tool Manufacturing Specification - Material Control - 015) TMS-MC -015 Applicable to FORT WORTH – MARIETTA - PALMDALE Sites To the extent specified herein REVISION 30 CONTROLLED AND APPROVED BY: Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Supplier Quality Management May 2016 IMPORTANT NOTICE: A hard copy of this document may not be the document currently in effect. The current version is ALWAYS the version on the LOCKHEED MARTIN network. TMS-MC-015 Revision 30 Page 2 of 104 01 April 2016 * REVISED ** ADDED _____________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I. AIRCRAFT ITEMS AND TOOLING - SELLER REQUIREMENTS *1.0 SCOPE Page 5 *2.0 TOOLING DEFINITIONS Page 6 *3.0 INTERCHANGEABLE-REPLACEABLE (I/R) Page 10 4.0 “TO MATCH” HOLE PATTERNS AND OTHER I/R FEATURES Page 10 *5.0 CONTROL OF RECORDS FOR BUYER FURNISHED TOOLING Page 10 *6.0 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Page 11 *7.0 CONTROL OF BUYER-FURNISHED TOOLS Page 12 8.0 TOOL QUALITY CODE CATEGORIES Page 13 9.0 TOOL PROTECTION AND STORAGE REQUIREMENTS Page 14 *10.0 SHIPPING AND RECEIVING INSTRUCTIONS Page 14 *11.0 TOOLING PERIODIC INSPECTION AND RE-VERIFICATION Page 16 (PI/V) *12.0 TOOLING PERIODIC INSPECTION AND RE-VERIFICATION Page 18 (PI/V) RECORDS 13.0 BUYER FURNISHED AND SELLER TO SELLER TRANSFER OF TOOLS Page 19 14.0 LOCKHEED MARTIN SUBCONTRACT SOURCE BOOKS Page 19 *15.0 BASIC PRINCIPLES FOR PRODUCTION USE OF TOOLING Page 19 PART II. MANUFACTURED SPECIAL TOOLING ONLY – SELLER REQUIREMENTS 1.0 GENERAL Page 20 *2.0 NON-RECURRING TOOL MANUFACTURING Page 20 3.0 SPECIAL TOOLING INSPECTION AND QUALITY REQUIREMENTS Page 21 *4.0 TOOL IDENTIFICATION AND SHIPPING REQUIREMENTS Page 23 5.0 PROCESS FOR TRANSFER OF TOOL DESIGNS FROM SELLER Page 24 TO BUYER 6.0 SEALING CRITICAL LOCATORS Page 24 *7.0 DUPLICATE TOOL MANUFACTURING Page 24 8.0 INTERCHANGEABLE- REPLACEABLE (I/R) DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING Page 24 9.0 NON (I/R) DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING Page 25 PART III. INTERNATIONAL SELLER REQUIREMENTS 1.0 GENERAL Page 26 2.0 CONTROL OF SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE), MANUFACTURING TEST EQUIPMENT (MTE) AND SPECIAL TEST EQUIPMENT (STE) Page 26 3.0 CHANGE AUTHORIZATION Page 27 *4.0 TOOLING PRACTICES FOR BUYER FURNISHED TOOLS Page 27 5.0 LISTINGS OF SELLER-FABRICATED/PROCURED ST OR STE Page 27 6.0 DRAWINGS, SKETCHES, TOOL DESIGNS, ETC. Page 27 7.0 CALIBRATION AND RE-CALIBRATION OF BUYER-FURNISHED Page 28 OR SELLER-FABRICATED STE 8.0 TOOLING USE AND TOLERANCE REQUIREMENTS Page 28 IMPORTANT NOTICE: A hard copy of this document may not be the document currently in effect. The current version is ALWAYS the version on the LOCKHEED MARTIN network. TMS-MC-015 Revision 30 Page 3 of 104 01 April 2016 *9.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS OF SELLER-OWNED Page 28 OR SELLER-FABRICATED PRODUCTION TOOLING PART IV. APPENDICES APPENDIX A – REWORK, REPAIR AND COORDINATION GUIDE Page 29 APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS *1.0 SCOPE Page 29 2.0 TOOLING PRECEDENCE OVER ENGINEERING STATEMENTS Page 29 *3.0 PRESERVATION OF BUYER FURNISHED TOOLS Page 33 4.0 STANDARD REPAIR TOLERANCES AND COORDINATION Page 36 5.0 STANDARD I/R IDENTIFICATION AND REWORK Page 39 6.0 “TO MATCH” HOLE PATTERNS AND OTHER I/R FEATURES Page 45 7.0 SHIPPING AND STORAGE CONTAINERS FOR BUYER FURNISHED TOOLS Page 46 8.0 BUYER FURNISHED TOOLING AND SELLER TO SELLER TRANSFER OF TOOLS Page 48 9.0 SET – UP PROCEDURE FOR FLOOR BASED ASSEMBLY JIGS Page 48 APPENDIX B – AIR FRAME TOOL CODES AND DEFINITION Page 51 LIST OF FIGURES 1. I/R TOOL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Page 26 LIST OF FIGURES (Appendix A) 1. TYPICAL DS228 COMMON TOOL IDENTIFICATION PLAQUE Page 37 2. DOUBLE RAIL (INTERCHANGEABLE) Page 37 3. DOUBLE RAIL (REPLACEABLE, AND NON I/R, NET OR WITH EXCESS) Page 38 4. SINGLE RAIL SET-BACK TYPE (NON-I/R, NET OR WITH EXCESS) Page 38 5. PLUGGED TOOL HOLE EXAMPLE Page 39 6. TYPICAL TOOLING HOLE AND IDENTIFICATION OF TOOLING HOLES Page 39 7. TYPICAL PIN HOLE AND IDENTIFICATION OF PIN HOLES Page 39 8. DS-1017 I/R IDENTIFICATION LABEL Page 40 9. EXAMPLE OF I/R WEAR GROOVE INDICATORS Page 41 10. I/R HOLE IDENTIFICATION OPTIONS Page 41 11. I/R HOLE IDENTIFICATION EXAMPLE Page 42 12. PRODUCTION TOOL TO CONTROL TOOL Page 46 13. EXAMPLE OF “TO MATCH” HOLE PATTERNS AS DEFINED ON ENG. DRAWING Page 47 14. EXAMPLE OF TYPE I CONTAINER Page 48 15. EXAMPLE OF TYPE II-3 CONTAINER Page 48 16. EXAMPLE OF TYPE I-4 CONTAINER FOR LARGE TOOLS Page 49 TABLES (Appendix A) IMPORTANT NOTICE: A hard copy of this document may not be the document currently in effect. The current version is ALWAYS the version on the LOCKHEED MARTIN network. TMS-MC-015 Revision 30 Page 4 of 104 01 April 2016 UNPAINTED SURFACE COATING - Table 1.0 Page 35 COORDINATION PIN TOLERANCE – Table 2.0 Page 43 PRODUCTION ITEM TO PRODUCTION TOOL – Table 3.0 Page 44 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS PM-4053 TOOLING MANUAL – Access limited due to Protected Data contained therein. Sellers contracted to fabricate or rework Special Tooling shall contact Buyer to submit access request. PM-4053 contains complete Buyer’s design, manufacturing and preservation requirements that are only briefly described or illustrated in this Manual. Seller shall refer to PM-4053 for complete specifications when this TMS Manual is imposed on a Purchase Order. See Part I, section 1.0. PURCHASE ORDER QUALITY APPENDIX “QX” – Supplier Quality Requirements PURCHASE ORDER QUALITY APPENDIX “QI” – Intra-Lockheed Martin Work Transfer Agreement (IWTA) Quality Requirements applicable to specific Lockheed Martin sites. FEDERAL AQUISITION REGULATION – FAR Subpart 2.101 Definitions “Special Tooling” FEDERAL AQUISITION REGULATION – FAR 52.245-1 Government Property FEDERAL AQUSITION REGULATION - DFAR 252.211-7003 IUID / RFID PART/DOCUMENT NUMBER POLICY (F-35 Program Standard) – 2YZA00996 IMPORTANT NOTICE: A hard copy of this document may not be the document currently in effect. The current version is ALWAYS the version on the LOCKHEED MARTIN network. TMS-MC-015 Revision 30 Page 5 of 104 01 April 2016 PART I AIRCRAFT ITEMS AND TOOLING - SELLER REQUIREMENTS 1.0 SCOPE *1.1 This Tooling Manual “Manual” is applicable in its entirety when Quality Appendix QX or QI is specified by this Purchase Order (PO). Any deviations from the requirements contained herein shall only be authorized by Buyer, in writing. This Manual contains the contractual requirements to properly control and maintain Seller Owned and Buyer Furnished Tooling in conjunction with all applicable documents listed or referenced in this Manual. The term Buyer Furnished Tooling comprises Special Tooling (ST), Support Equipment (SE), Manufacturing Support Equipment (MSE), Special Test Equipment (STE) and Manufacturing Test Equipment (MTE) for Buyer; as such terms are hereinafter defined in section 2.0, used to produce Items for Buyer. The term Seller Owned comprises any similar type tooling used in the manufacturing process for an item deliverable to Buyer. “Buyer’s assigned Quality Representative” shall mean the assigned Lockheed Martin Quality Representative responsible for on-site oversight of deliverable items, tool manufacturing, rework, repair, in-process acceptance and final acceptance of authorized tasks. 1.2 This Manual contains general and specific requirements that are applicable to airframe structural components as specified in this PO and other applicable documents. This manual is not applicable to Sellers of aircraft systems components that are subject to Automated Test Procedures (ATP). Tooling Manual PM-4053 takes precedence over all manufacturing and preservation requirements when conflicts exist between this Manual and PM-4053, if any. Right of access to PM-4053 is not necessary for all Sellers. *1.2.1 Seller shall consult with Buyer and Buyer’s assigned Quality representative to determine the need for PM-4053 access based upon PO requirements. Only Sellers contracted to perform airframe tooling task on a continual basis shall be granted access. Buyer may choose to forward hard copies of applicable sections from PM-4053 in lieu of granting access. 1.2.2 Seller shall perform authorized tool manufacturing, rework, alter, or repairs per this PO and this Manual. 1.2.3 The terms “Item” or its plural “Items”, “PO”, “Seller”, and “Buyer” as used herein, have the same meaning as the terms “Work”, “Contract”, “SELLER”, and “LOCKHEED MARTIN”, respectively. *1.3 Seller shall immediately notify Buyer’s assigned Quality representative if and when Buyer authorizes the manufacture, rework or repair of any ST to support delivery of Items as specified in this PO. Buyer’s assigned Quality representative shall determine the level of Buyer oversight required for in-process verification and or final acceptance of any such manufacturing, rework or repair of all tooling utilized in the manufacturing process for any deliverable Item. See Part II for Tool Manufacturing Requirements. *1.4 Intra-Lockheed Martin Work Transfer Agreement (IWTA): The performing business unit (herein referred to as Seller) shall be responsible for establishing and maintaining requirements, procedures and processes that ensure configuration control is maintained throughout the duration of this IWTA. See Part I, section 7.0 for specific Tool Control requirements. *1.5 Seller’s quality management system shall ensure all Seller Owned Tooling, SE, MSE, STE and MTE utilized for acceptance or validation of deliverable items to Buyer are calibrated and evidence of such calibration is maintained. IMPORTANT NOTICE: A hard copy of this document may not be the document currently in effect. The current version is ALWAYS the version on the LOCKHEED MARTIN network. TMS-MC-015 Revision 30 Page 6 of 104 01 April 2016 1.6 For the purpose of this Manual, “Parts Manufacturer” is defined as a Seller that manufactures parts, components, assemblies or items that are deliverable to the Buyer, LM Aero site, or facility.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tool, Dies and Moulds Report
    TOOL, DIES AND MOULDS REPORT 1. WHAT IS TOOLING? The equipment required to convert raw material into a required shape is commonly referred to as tooling. The process of equipment manufacture that aids in the conversion of a raw material into a required shape is commonly referred to as tool, die and mould making. Materials converted include: • Metals • Aluminium • Polymers (Plastics) Tooling is found in almost all manufacturing industries including: • Automotive • Aerospace • Rail & Marine • Defense • Mining • Agro-processing • Mineral beneficiation • Leisure • Packaging (foodstuffs, consumer goods and electronics) The manufacturing industry is dependant on the availability of a good tool, die and mould making industry. Tools, dies and moulds directly contribute to: • Manufacturing output capacity, • Quality standard of a product produced, • Price competitiveness of the product produced, • Lifecycle cost of a product produced. 1 2. DEFINITION OF INDIVIDUAL AREAS OF TOOL, DIES AND MOULDS. I. WHAT IS A TOOL? A machine tool is a powered mechanical device, typically used to fabricate metal components of machines by machining, which is the selective removal of metal. The term machine tool is usually reserved for tools that used a power source other than human movement, but they can be powered by people if appropriately set up. Many historians of technology consider that the true machine tools were born when direct human involvement was removed from the shaping or stamping process of the different kinds of tools. Machine tools can be powered from a variety of sources. Human and animal power are options, as is energy captured through the use of waterwheels. However, machine tools really began to develop after the development of the steam engine, leading to the Industrial Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa.Gov/Search.Jsp?R=19740027166 2020-03-23T02:10:34+00:00Z
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19740027166 2020-03-23T02:10:34+00:00Z NASA CR-134596 FRACTURE CONTROL METHODS FOR SPACE VEHICLES Volume I Fracture Control Design Methods BY A.F. Liu REPRODUCED BY NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE SPRINGFIELD, VA. 22161 Cr; OF: PI *z1-1 m Ff 1x1 t.Q 1-1 Prepared for -4 = i a), mkrzr * I.nmu.5dw NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION =lIJ-1 I-I U .ri rn+mor! r Filffiid I IrlII-U Pi U U 4 1-rl 5 5 t PIO-Qh NASA Lewis Research Center Contract NAS 3-16765 FRACTURE CONTROL METHODS FOR SPACE VEH l CLE S Volume I Fractu re Control Design Methods by A. F. Liu Contract NAS3- 16765 NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio August 1974 * 1 Report No 2 Government Access~onNo 3 Reclptent s Cataloq No NASA CR-134596 4 Tttle and Subt~tle 5 Report Date Fracture Control Methods for Space Vehicles Volume I, August 19 74 Fracture Control Design Methods 6 Perforrntng Organlzatton Code 7 Author(s1 A.F. Liu 8 Perforrn~ngOrganlzatlon Report No SD 73-SH-0171-1 9 Perform~ngOrgantzatlon Name and Address 10 Work Unit No Space Division Rockwell International Corporation 11 Contract or Grant No Downey, CA 90241 NAS 3-16765 12 Sponsor~ngAgency Name and Address 13 Type of Report and Pertod Covered National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contractor Report .June 1972 through March 1974- 21000 Brookpark Rd. 14 Sponsortng Agency Code Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135 15 Supplementary Notes Project Manager, Gordon T.
    [Show full text]
  • FRENCH PRE-WAR REGISTER Early Companies: CMA – Compagnie Des Messageries Aeriennes. Commenced 1.5.19 Paris-Lille; Paris-Londo
    FRENCH PRE-WAR REGISTER Version 120211 Early Companies: CMA – Compagnie des Messageries Aeriennes. Commenced 1.5.19 Paris-Lille; Paris-London 26.8.19 (JV with Handley Page Transport). CGT – Compagnie Generale Transaerienne. Formed in 1909 to operate airships. Op Paris-London in 1920 in JV with AT&T. CGEA – Compagnie des Grands Express Aeriens. Formed 5.19 by Lt Villier and other air force officers. Paris-London wef 5.3.20. Compagnie Latecoere. Formed 24.12.18 to fly Toulouse-Barcelona; to Alicante 25.2.19; to Rabat 20.3.19; to Casablanca 1.9.19. CAF – Compagnie Aerienne Francaise. Nimes-Nice wef 17.4.19; Suspended 8.20. Aero Transport Compagnie Ernoult. Late 1919 operating Salmsons and Sopwiths Bordeaux-Agen-Toulouse-Narbonne- Bezier-Montpellier. Also op associate as Aero Publicite. TASO – Compagnie des Transports Aeriens du Sud Ouest. Formed 7.19; renamed Societe Franco Bilbaise des Transports Aeriens in 1920 (?). Biarritz-Bordeaux 8.19; to Sans Sebastian 9.19. Bayonne-Bilbao wef 13.6.20 Lignes Farman. Paris-London. To Casablanca & Port Etienne 11.8.19; to Copenhagen 13.8.19. Paris-London 9.19; to Briussels Compagnie Aero Transport. Paris-Geneva 1.7.20 in associateion with L’Ecole Aero Suisse (Sopwiths) CFRNA – Compagnie Franco Roumaine de Navigation Aerienne – formed 23.4.20. Paris-Strasbourg 20.9.20 (Salmson/Potez); to Prague 7.10.20. CGA – Compagnie Generale Aeronautique. Formed 1920 Societe des Transports Aeriens Guyannais. Formed 1919 (Levy seaplanes) St Laurent-Snini-Cayenne F-"ALxx" – Lignes Aeriennes Latecoere Note – Cie Generale d’Entreprises Aeronautiques formed 6/21 by Latecoere) F-ALAA Latecoere Breguet 14 (1) 6.20 [[173] M Latecoere, Toulouse F-ALAE Latecoere Breguet 14 (26) 6.20 [198] M Latecoere, Toulouse F-ALAI Salmson 2.A2 (31) 6.20 (141) M Latecoere, Toulouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Ssc-464 High Speed Aluminum Vessels Design Guide Ship
    NTIS # PB2012- SSC-464 HIGH SPEED ALUMINUM VESSELS DESIGN GUIDE This document has been approved For public release and sale; its Distribution is unlimited SHIP STRUCTURE COMMITTEE 2012 Ship Structure Committee RADM P.F. Zukunft RDML Thomas Eccles U. S. Coast Guard Assistant Commandant, Chief Engineer and Deputy Commander Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety, Security For Naval Systems Engineering (SEA05) and Stewardship Co-Chair, Ship Structure Committee Co-Chair, Ship Structure Committee Mr. H. Paul Cojeen Dr. Roger Basu Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers Senior Vice President American Bureau of Shipping Mr. Christopher McMahon Mr. Victor Santos Pedro Director, Office of Ship Construction Director Design, Equipment and Boating Safety, Maritime Administration Marine Safety, Transport Canada Mr. Kevin Baetsen Dr. Neil Pegg Director of Engineering Group Leader - Structural Mechanics Military Sealift Command Defence Research & Development Canada - Atlantic Mr. Jeffrey Lantz, Mr. Edward Godfrey Commercial Regulations and Standards for the Director, Structural Integrity and Performance Division Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety, Security and Stewardship Dr. John Pazik Mr. Jeffery Orner Director, Ship Systems and Engineering Research Deputy Assistant Commandant for Engineering and Division Logistics SHIP STRUCTURE SUB-COMMITTEE AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING (ABS) DEFENCE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CANADA ATLANTIC Mr. Craig Bone Dr. David Stredulinsky Mr. Phil Rynn Mr. John Porter Mr. Tom Ingram MARITIME ADMINISTRATION (MARAD) MILITARY SEALIFT COMMAND (MSC) Mr. Chao Lin Mr. Michael W. Touma Mr. Richard Sonnenschein Mr. Jitesh Kerai NAVY/ONR / NAVSEA/ NSWCCD TRANSPORT CANADA Mr. David Qualley / Dr. Paul Hess Natasa Kozarski Mr. Erik Rasmussen / Dr. Roshdy Barsoum Luc Tremblay Mr. Nat Nappi, Jr. Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Intentionally Left Blank (Ssc Cover)
    NOTE: INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK (SSC COVER) NOTE: INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK (SSC INSIDE COVER) Member Agencies: Address Correspondence to: American Bureau of Shipping COMMANDANT (CG-5212/SSC) Defence Research and Development Canada ATTN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SHIP Maritime Administration STRUCTURE COMMITTEE) Military Sealift Command US COAST GUARD Naval Sea Systems Command 2100 2ND ST SW STOP 7126 Society of Naval Architects & Marine Engineers WASHINGTON DC 20593-7126 Transport Canada Website: http://www.shipstructure.org United States Coast Guard Ship Structure Committee SSC – ### SR – #### MONTH DAY, YEAR TITLE Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nunc dolor massa, tincidunt ultrices congue scelerisque, tempor sit amet orci. Aenean velit nulla, elementum bibendum scelerisque sed, dapibus ac eros. Pellentesque a ligula magna, vel molestie elit. Aenean vel nisi augue, non elementum felis. Morbi convallis volutpat iaculis. Fusce aliquet dui interdum sem congue non malesuada risus porttitor. Donec libero mi, vehicula et lobortis ultricies, accumsan ut nunc. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Vivamus diam odio, euismod vel volutpat sed, sodales eget eros. Aenean dolor est, imperdiet sed elementum suscipit, posuere sed sem. Nam tellus tortor, adipiscing ut iaculis id, eleifend sit amet lorem. Donec justo lectus, pellentesque ut pellentesque nec, hendrerit eu ligula. Vestibulum iaculis libero eget ipsum consectetur a venenatis velit malesuada. Suspendisse fermentum eleifend gravida. Aenean sed magna diam, vitae faucibus lorem. Aliquam leo elit, ornare vitae luctus in, blandit in leo. Nullam vel lobortis libero. Etiam non tortor id tellus volutpat ultricies. Vestibulum sollicitudin viverra odio, sollicitudin aliquet quam gravida nec. Suspendisse fermentum condimentum mollis.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewelry Tools Copy
    Tools Soldering Torch Most affordable, easy: Butane Torch, 500086 at Rio Grande, $39.99. The jeweler’s version has a larger flame, large output, and more even heat than the cheap kinds usually used for creme brulee...good news, you can still make the fancy dessert with this one. More experienced: Smith Silversmith Torch with Acetylene/Ambient Air #239-193 (one tank of Acetylene, no oxygen tank). Hotter torch and bigger setup. Cyberweld price as of December 2016 is about $180, which comes with NE180A handle and 00 tip (small) http:// store.cyberweld.com/sismsoou.html. I would suggest adding an “0” tip, another $25. You’ll also need MC acetylene tank, which can be refilled. Current price at Cyberweld is $55, but can be purchased or leased from a welding supply locally. Other options: Smith Little Torch is a much hotter torch setup with much smaller tips. This torch is good for soldering gold, or heating large quantities of silver for casting. For new jewelry artists, the heat is hard to control and you may end up melting your pieces. I would not recommend this for new artists—it’s overkill. Soldering Tools Silver solder: Silver solder is mix of silver and other metals to lower its melting temperature. You’ll mainly use one of three varieties: easy, medium, and hard. Easy has the lowest melting temperature, and hard has the highest. It’s important to have all three on hand. If there are multiple soldering operations, you’ll generally start with hard (example, bezel), then use medium or easy to solder the second operation (bezel to backplate).
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Layered Thermoplastic Polymer Films Comprising
    (19) TZZ¥__T (11) EP 3 148 796 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: B32B 7/12 (2006.01) A61F 13/514 (2006.01) 25.07.2018 Bulletin 2018/30 B32B 27/08 (2006.01) B32B 27/32 (2006.01) B32B 27/36 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 15728357.3 (86) International application number: (22) Date of filing: 01.06.2015 PCT/US2015/033452 (87) International publication number: WO 2015/187520 (10.12.2015 Gazette 2015/49) (54) MULTI-LAYERED THERMOPLASTIC POLYMER FILMS COMPRISING POLYLACTIC ACID MEHRSCHICHTIGE THERMOPLASTISCHE POLYMERFOLIEN MIT POLYMILCHSÄURE FILMS POLYMÈRES THERMOPLASTIQUES MULTICOUCHES COMPRENANT DE L’ACIDE POLYLACTIQUE (84) Designated Contracting States: • BROWN, April Renae AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 (US) GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO • GILBERTSON, Gary Wayne PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 (US) (30) Priority: 02.06.2014 US 201462006508 P (74) Representative: Hoyng Rokh Monegier LLP Rembrandt Tower, 31st Floor (43) Date of publication of application: Amstelplein 1 05.04.2017 Bulletin 2017/14 1096 HA Amsterdam (NL) (73) Proprietor: The Procter & Gamble Company (56) References cited: Cincinnati, OH 45202 (US) EP-A1- 1 567 321 WO-A2-2013/006464 US-A1- 2011 052 867 (72) Inventors: • BROYLES, Norman Scott Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 (US) Note: Within nine months of the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent in the European Patent Bulletin, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to that patent, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Study and Analysis Compound Die Manufacturing Using Wc
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT ADVANCEMENT IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING &TECHNOLOGY (ICRAMET’ 15) Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences ISSN: 0974-2115 STUDY AND ANALYSIS COMPOUND DIE MANUFACTURING USING WC- EDM PROCESS P.Kumaran, M.Venkatraman Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technolgy,Paiyanoor, Kanchipuram-603 104. Chennai, TamilNadu-India. ABSTRACT Generally tool and die making includes forming rolls, lathe bits, cutters, etc. At present most of the industries around here use conventional type of machining, such as form cutting casting, etc. for manufacturing dies. This process though may seem cheap, actually compromises in quality of the die, its precision and accuracy and sometimes in the design of the component if not carefully made. To remove these errors off the equation in manufacturing dies, one of the modern techniques of manufacturing, Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) can be implemented. Precision is important in die making; punches and dies must maintain proper clearance to produce parts accurately. Usually tool and die making mainly focuses on design and manufacture sector, since the outcome of product solely depends on these two factors. This paper’s objective is to implement the Electrical Discharge Machining process to make dies for a simple but widely used component in mass production in a factory without sacrificing the quality and allowance in dimension and shape that is obtained in conventional machining. INTRODUCTION The primary method of impairing form and dimension to a work piece is the removal of material by the use of edged cutting tools. An oversize mass is literally carved to its intended shape. The removal of material from work piece is termed generation of form by machining, or simply machining.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Hydravions CAMS
    Publicité de la CAMS, « la plus grande firme française d’hydravions », parue dans la revue L’Aéronautique n° 138, novembre 1930. (Collection de l’auteur). 1 Parallèlement, Santoni entreprend en Italie, un Naissance des Chantiers pays dont il est originaire, la création d’une impor- tante société pour fabriquer sous licence les avions Aéro Maritimes de la d’Henry et Maurice Farman, mais il y introduit aussi les produits français qu’il connaît bien : héli- Seine (CAMS) ces Régy et Chauvière, vernis Emaillite, et divers instruments de bord. Le 5 mai 1913, il crée à Va- Laurent-Dominique Santoni est né à Genève en rèse en Italie une société pour la construction Suisse le 19 février 1877. Après des études primai- d’hydravions, la Société anonyme de construction aéro- res et secondaires en France, parlant couramment nautique Savoïa. l’Italien et l’Anglais, (pour les uns il est Lawrence Santoni, pour les autres Lorenzo Santoni), il achève sa formation en décrochant un diplôme d’ingénieur. A vingt-deux ans, il suit avec passion le meeting de Reims et veut devenir aviateur. En 1910 à Port-Aviation (communes de Juvisy-sur- Orge et Viry-Châtillon) où s’ouvrent les premières écoles de l’air, il fréquente les premiers aviateurs, Louis Gaudart, chef pilote Voisin, le comte de Saint-Germain, chef pilote de l’école Donnet sur FBA type C aux couleurs de la marine italienne (1915). Le type C appareil Blériot, Pauwels et Bobba, les pilotes de italien construit chez S.I.A.I.-Savoïa était propulsé par un moteur fixe l’école d’Ambroise Goupy, et Emile Dubonnet, le à six cylindres en ligne Isotta-Fraschini de 120 ch.
    [Show full text]
  • 2022 Civic Partner and History of Aid
    2022 CIVIC PARTNER AND HISTORY OF AID ORGANIZATION Dunedin Fine Arts Center AMOUNT REQUESTED $75, 000 PURPOSE FOR AID Goal of DFAC is to keep programs as affordable as possible. 2021 FUNDING $42,000 ( Cash Aid) HISTORY OF AID FY 2021 FY 2020 FY 2019 FY 2018 FY 2017 Organization: Estimated Estimated Actual Actual Actual Dunedin Fine Art Center Cash Aid $42,000 $42,000 $52,000 $52,000 $42,300 Utility Charges (in-kind) $5,000 $5,000 $5,651 $5,109 $4,888 Improvements to Building TOTAL $47,000 $47,000 $57,651 $57,109 $47,188 June 3, 2021 Committee Members, City Manager, Mayor of Dunedin, City Commissioners and Finance Department Re: 2022 Civic Partner Request to the City of Dunedin Dear Friends: The Partnership between the City of Dunedin and the Dunedin Fine Art Center (DFAC) has spanned four decades. Today, it is as strong and mutually beneficial. The welcoming and quality of life that the City of Dunedin offers residents and visitors is in perfect sync. DFAC is a major cultural institution. Our symbiotic relationship heightens the profile of both DFAC and the City. DFAC is the largest art center in the Southeastern United States, offering a fully comprehensive visual arts program to residents, surrounding counties of Greater Tampa Bay and the country. We are grateful to the City of Dunedin for your generosity, cooperation, and support dating back to 1969 when Syd Entel and the Junior Service League had a vision to build an art center on City land. Today, that art center is 40,000 square feet and we are very grateful to the City for the in-kind maintenance and cash grants given over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • TSR2 with HINDSIGHT
    TSR2 with HINDSIGHT Edited by Air Vice-Marshal A F C Hunter CBE AFC DL 2 TSR2 WITH HINDSIGHT The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. Copyright © 1998: Royal Air Force Historical Society First published in the UK in 1998 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data available ISBN 0-9519824 8 6 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. Photographs courtesy of BAe North West Heritage Group and Rolls-Royce plc, Bristol Typeset and printed in Great Britain by Fotodirect Ltd, Brighton Royal Air Force Historical Society TSR2 WITH HINDSIGHT 3 s of all three pilots who flew the aircraft. flew who pilots three of all s A fine shot of TSR2 in flight bearing the signature the bearing in flight TSR2 of shot fine A 4 TSR2 WITH HINDSIGHT Contents Page Foreword 6 Air Vice-Marshal A F C Hunter CBE AFC MA LLB DL Chairman’s Introductory Remarks 7 Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC DL Section One Setting the Scene 9 Wing Commander R P Beamont CBE DSO* DFC* FRAeS DL The History of the Project and the Operational 12 Requirement Group Captain W A Mears BA A System Study of TSR2 16 Wing Commander G B Wilson BSc CEng MIEE Discussion 26 Section Two
    [Show full text]
  • Machining Method
    PRINCIPLE OF SPARK EROSION The principle of spark erosion is simple. The work- piece and tool are placed in the working position in such a way that they do not touch each other. They are separated by a gap which is filled with an insulating fluid. The cutting process therefore takes place in a tank. The workpiece and tool are connected to a D.C. source via a cable. There is a switch in one lead. When this is closed, an electri- cal potential is applied between the workpiece and tool. At first no current flows because the dielectric between the workpiece and tool is an insulator. However, if the gap is reduced then a spark jumps across it when it reaches a certain very small size. In this process, which is also known as a discharge, current is converted into heat. The surface of the material is very strongly heated in the area of the discharge channel. If the flow of current is inter- rupted the discharge channel collapses very quickly . Consequently the molten metal on the surface of the material evaporates explosively and takes liquid material with it down to a certain depth. A small crater is formed. lf one discharge is followed by another, new craters are for med next to the pre- vious ones and the workpiece surface is constantly eroded. THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE GENERALLY USED TODAY TO ASSESS DIFFERENT DIELECTRIC FLUIDS: a) Degree of metal removal and electrode wear b) Effects on health: skin irritation toxicity smoke odours c) Flash point d) Density e) Evaporation number f) Viscosity g) Conductivity Electric discharge machining (EDM), sometimes colloquially also referred to as spark machining, spark eroding, burning, die sinking, wire burning orwire erosion, is a manufacturing process whereby a desired shape is obtained using electrical discharges (sparks).
    [Show full text]