Issued by the Britain-Tanzania Society No 111 May - Aug 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Issued by the Britain-Tanzania Society No 111 May - Aug 2015 Tanzanian Affairs Issued by the Britain-Tanzania Society No 111 May - Aug 2015 Analysis of the Proposed Constitution Swahili as the Medium of Instruction in Schools Abdul Paliwala : ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CONSTITUTION The recent seminar arranged by BTS and the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) on the proposed constitution for Tanzania included four very enlightening presentations. Unfortunately, we do not have space here for all four, but we are delighted to be able to include this one. Abdul Paliwala is Emeritus Professor of Law at the University of Warwick; He is also currently Visiting Professor of Law at Birkbeck (University of London). The purpose of a Constitution is to serve and to promote the well- being of the people of a nation. In particular, it is intended to provide an element of peace and personal security for law-abiding citizens. It is intended to provide for citizens a solid foundation on the basis of which they can organise their lives knowing (or believing) that the things they most value will be safeguarded, and the things they most fear will not take place. In order to fulfil that function however, the constitution has to uphold, to strengthen and support the unity of the nation regardless of any internal distribution of power between groups or regions. It should be their conscious declaration of them- selves as a unity. It should be their collective, “I am”, a deliberate assertion by the group that is united in a common citizenship and with duties and rights to and from each other in that capacity. Julius Nyerere Mwalimu Nyerere was here emphasising the idea of universal accept- ance and legitimacy, which is the hallmark of the most enduring con- stitutions. Constitutional lawyers increasingly suggest that the Constitution is not a document but a process, and that constitutions have to be ‘built’ to last. This building involves the process of making a new constitution, the process of its enactment and the continual process of ensuring that the entire nation now and in the future continues to accept it as a collec- tive ‘I am’. This paper therefore deals briefly with these three aspects of Constitutional Building. It is not my intention to lay any blame on any side, but it is sad that the Tanzanian constitutional review process, which started so well, faces cover photo: MP for Ludewa, Deo Filikunnjombe, testing a biometric voting registration machine, with Prof. Amone Chaligha watching. (www.wavuti.com) Analysis of Proposed Constitution 3 severe challenges today. The very nature of those challenges, with par- ties walking out, puts in jeopardy the notion of a ‘conscious declaration of unity, the collective I am’ that Mwalimu talked about. The Constitutional Process Tanzania established a Constitutional Review Committee composed of equal representation from Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar and con- taining eminent persons including as chair the former Prime Minister Joseph Warioba. The Committee carried out a wide consultation at the end of which it produced the first draft constitution in June 2013. This was again the basis of further consultation at the end of which was pro- duced the 2nd draft in September. This draft was substantially revised by the Constituent Assembly and approved by 2/3 majority votes of members from each part of the Union. However, this was partly because the opposition walked out! They felt that the Government side was dominating the proceedings. The Constitutional Review Act requires a referendum to approve the Constitution with a simple majority vote in each part of the Union. At one stage it was announced that this would be postponed until after the general election. However in October 2014 the President announced that the referendum will now take place in April 2015. The confusion, opposition walk-out, delays and limited time for proper information and deliberation on the referendum means that the Constitutional Review process has been problematic! The Constitutional Drafts The Second Aspect of Building a Constitution is the Document itself. How robust is it? It is therefore necessary to compare the drafts pre- pared by the Constitutional Review Commission (CRC) and the pro- posal approved by the Constituent Assembly (CA). This section deals with four key aspects of the drafts and proposals. These include the Union, Presidential powers in relation to other insti- tutions of governance, accountability and fundamental objectives and human rights. The Union What is the authority of the Union Government over Zanzibar? The CRC proposed a 3 government structure including a government for 4 Analysis of Proposed Constitution Tanzania mainland, for Zanzibar and the Union Government. Each would have clear competence in relation to its assigned matters, so that Union laws could not override Zanzibar laws in areas of their compe- tence. However, this proposal was rejected by the CA and its proposed constitution provides essentially for the retention of the existing two government structure. Zanzibar is responsible for certain areas and the Union Government responsible for Union and Tanzania mainland affairs. The Union in 1964 was based on the Agreement between the two governments which was incorporated into the Acts of Union. This was essentially preserved in the 1977 Constitution and continues to form the basis of the Union and can be said to be the Fundamental Law of the Union. The CRC preserved this status under Article 1 (3); so does the CA. Yet at various points both drafts seem to refer to matters which under the Constitution come under Zanzibar authority. Does it mean that where there is a conflict the Acts of Union will prevail? What are the areas of competence? The current Constitution provides for 22 matters as Union matters. The CRC reduced this to 7. The National Assembly Proposed Constitution provides for 14. What are the limitations on competence of Zanzibar to decide its own affairs? There has been resentment in Zanzibar about a number of areas- including the budgetary, financial and taxation relationship. Another area has been the ability of Zanzibar to make agreements at interna- tional level, in particular, the controversy over whether Zanzibar could become a member of the Organisation of Islamic Countries. The CRC provided for the establishment of a Commission for Coordination of Relations between the three Governments consisting of five members. This would be chaired by the Vice President and include the Presidents of Zanzibar and the Mainland governments as well as Resident Ministers from Zanzibar and the Mainland and the Union Foreign Minister. It provided that in all matters, the Commission should observe the principle of equality in the provision of services in Zanzibar and the Mainland and the principle of ‘proportionality’ in matters of allocation. The CA also provides for a Coordination Commission with similar membership. In addition, Article 252 of the CA proposal provides for a Analysis of Proposed Constitution 5 Joint Finance Commission of the Union and Zanzibar Governments con- sisting of 4 members from the mainland and 3 from Zanzibar appointed by the President after consultation with the President of Zanzibar. The Finance Commission would work on principles of allocation of finances in the country. However, neither the Coordination Commission nor the Finance Commission are required to observe the principles of propor- tionality indicated in the CRC drafts, with the assumption that these will be worked out on a mutual basis. The CRC was concerned to give stronger powers to the Coordination Commission and used the words ‘special responsibility for ensuring’, whereas the CA Proposal uses less mandatory language ‘a special role to facilitate’. More significantly, the CRC provided for appeal to the Supreme Court in case of conflict in relation to issues. This recourse to the Supreme Court is removed in the CA proposal. Therefore the CA is tending to provide a facilitative rather than decisive role for the co- ordination process. Both the CRC and CA Drafts provide that Zanzibar can borrow inter- nationally with the cooperation of the Union Government. In addition they provide that Zanzibar can enter into agreements with international agencies and organisations, again with the co-operation of the Union government. However the CA proposal provides that the National Assembly may enact legislation to control any such agreements thus potentially limiting the power. In relation to the judiciary, the CRC proposed a hierarchy with the Apex Court being the Supreme Court of the Union, A Union Court of Appeal which could hear appeals from both parts of the Union, and separate High Courts for the Mainland and Zanzibar. In particular, the Zanzibar court would exercise jurisdiction in accordance with the Zanzibar Constitution. The Two Government solution of the CA has meant that while the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal have been retained, there is a High Court of the United Republic which can deal with all matters including union and Tanzania Mainland matters which are not specifically assigned to another court, for example the High Court of Zanzibar. However, Article 199 (2) provides parallel jurisdiction to the High Court of Zanzibar in relation to any law made by the union Parliament which applies to both Zanzibar and the mainland. In relation to Parliament, the CRC Draft Article 113 proposed a small 6 Analysis of Proposed Constitution union Parliament with a maximum of 75 members. This reflected the limited Union powers under the three government system. More spe- cifically, it divided the numbers for the Union Parliament for Zanzibar and the Mainland with 20 members from Zanzibar and 50 from the Mainland. The CA Proposal has increased to a minimum of 340 and a maximum to 390 members. More specifically in relation to the Union, it does not specify any ratio between Zanzibar and the Mainland, pre- sumably leaving it to the Electoral Commission, with the result that the principles of Zanzibar representation in Parliament are not clear.
Recommended publications
  • Online Document)
    Hii ni Nakala ya Mtandao (Online Document) BUNGE LA TANZANIA _________________ MAJADILIANO YA BUNGE ___________________ MKUTANO WA KUMI NA TANO Kikao cha Tano – Tarehe 15 Mei, 2014 (Kikao Kilianza Saa tatu Asubuhi) D U A Spika (Mhe. Anne S. Makinda) Alisoma Dua SPIKA: Waheshimiwa Wabunge, leo ni siku ya Alhamisi, kwa hiyo Kiongozi wa Kambi ya Upinzani hayupo hata ukikaa karibu hapo wewe siyo kiongozi. Kwa hiyo, nitaendelea na wengine kadiri walivyoleta, tunaanza na Mheshimiwa Eugen Mwaiposa. HATI ZILIZOWASILISHWA MEZANI Hati Zifuatazo Ziliwasilishwa Mezani na :- NAIBU WAZIRI WA KATIBA NA SHERIA: Hotuba ya Makadirio ya Matumizi na Mapato ya Fedha ya Wizara ya Katiba na Sheria kwa mwaka wa fedha 2014/2015. NAIBU WAZIRI WA MAMBO YA NDANI YA NCHI: Hotuba ya Makadirio ya Mapato na Matumizi ya Wizara ya Mambo ya Ndani ya Nchi kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2014/2015. MHE. NYAMBARI C. NYANGWINE (K.n.y. MWENYEKITI WA KAMATI YA KATIBA, SHERIA NA UTAWALA): Taarifa ya Kamati ya Kudumu ya Bunge ya Katiba, Sheria na Utawala Kuhusu Utekelezaji wa Majukumu ya Wizara ya Katiba na Sheria kwa Mwaka wa Fedha wa 2013/2014 na Maoni ya Kamati Kuhusu Makadirio ya Matumizi ya Wizara hiyo kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2014/2015. 1 Hii ni Nakala ya Mtandao (Online Document) MHE. CYNTHIA H. NGOYE (K.n.y. MWENYEKITI WA KAMATI YA ULINZI NA USALAMA): Taarifa ya Kamati ya Kudumu ya Bunge ya Ulinzi na Usalama Kuhusu Utekelezaji wa Majukumu ya Wizara ya Mambo ya Ndani ya Nchi kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2013/2014 na Maoni ya Kamati Kuhusu Makadirio ya Mapato na Matumuzi ya Wizara hiyo kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2014/2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotuba Ya Rais Wa Zanzibar Na Mwenyekiti Wa Baraza La Mapinduzi, Mhe
    1 HOTUBA YA RAIS WA ZANZIBAR NA MWENYEKITI WA BARAZA LA MAPINDUZI, MHE. DK. ALI MOHAMED SHEIN, KATIKA SHEREHE ZA MAADHIMISHO YA MIAKA 50 YA MAPINDUZI YA ZANZIBAR, UWANJA WA AMAAN TAREHE 12 JANUARI, 2014 Waheshimiwa Wageni wetu, Wakuu wa Nchi na Serikali na Mawaziri wa Nchi Rafiki mliohudhuria hapa leo, Mheshimiwa Dk. Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete, Rais wa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania; Mheshimiwa Dk. Mohamed Gharib Bilal, Makamu wa Rais wa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania; Mheshimiwa Mizengo Kayanza Peter Pinda, Waziri Mkuu wa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania; Mheshimiwa Maalim Seif Sharif Hamad, Makamu wa Kwanza wa Rais, Zanzibar; Mheshimiwa Balozi Seif Ali Iddi, Makamu wa Pili wa Rais, Zanzibar; Mheshimiwa Mzee Ali Hassan Mwinyi, Rais Mstaafu wa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania; Mheshimiwa Benjamin William Mkapa, Rais Mstaafu wa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania; Mheshimiwa Dk. Salmin Amour Juma, Rais Mstaafu wa Zanzibar na Mwenyekiti wa Baraza la Mapinduzi; Mheshimiwa Dk. Amani Abeid Karume, Rais Mstaafu wa Zanzibar na Mwenyekiti wa Baraza la Mapinduzi; Viongozi Wakuu Wastaafu Mliohudhuria; Waheshimiwa Mawaziri wa Serikali ya Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania na wa Serikali ya Mapinduzi ya Zanzibar; Mheshimiwa Mama Anne Makinda, Spika wa Bunge la Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania; 2 Mheshimiwa Pandu Ameir Kificho, Spika wa Baraza la Wawakilishi la Zanzibar; Mheshimiwa Othman Chande Mohamed, Jaji Mkuu wa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania; Mheshimiwa Omar Othman Makungu, Jaji Mkuu wa Zanzibar; Waheshimiwa Mabalozi na Wawakilishi wa Mashirika ya Kimataifa; Mheshimiwa Abdalla Mwinyi, Mkuu wa Mkoa wa Mjini Magharibi; Waheshimiwa Viongozi wa Serikali na Vyama vya Siasa; Ndugu Wananchi, Mabibi na Mabwana; Assalaam Alaykum, Kwa unyenyekevu mkubwa, namshukuru Mwenyezi Mungu, Muumba Mbingu na Ardhi na vyote vilivyomo ndani yake, kwa kutujaalia uhai na uzima wa afya, tukaweza kukusanyika hapa leo kuadhimisha miaka 50 ya Mapinduzi Matukufu ya Zanzibar, ya tarehe 12 Januari, 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Python Challenge #1 in Python, We Can Use Lists To
    Python Challenge #1 In Python, we can use lists to store related items together in a single place. Two examples are: tanzanian_election_years = [1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015] tanzanian_presidents = [“John Magu uli!, “Ja"aya #i"$ete!, “%en&a'in M"apa!, ( “)li *assan M$inyi!, “Julius +yerere!] 1. On a computer or tablet, write a Python program that prints out each year that Tanzania has had a general election. In Python, you can loop over the items of a list like this: or ite' in list, - do so'ething $ith ite' 2. Using your answer for #1, change it slightly so that it only prints out the years in which Tanzania has had a general election after the year 1999. 3. Sometimes we want to work with two lists at the same time. Say we are given the following list of Tanzanian vice presidents: tanzanian_.ice_presidents = [“/a'ia /uluhu!, “Moha'ed 0hari1 %ilal!, ( “2'ar )li Ju'a!, “3leopa Msuya!, “)1oud Ju'1e!] and we want to match each vice president with the president he or she served with. We can use Python’s zip() function to do this. To illustrate how zip() works, type the following into your Python interpreter (note: don’t type the “>>>”, that is printed by the Python interpreter itself): 444 ruits = [“apple!, “grape!, “1lue1erry!] 444 colors = [“green!, “purple!, “1lue!] 444 zip5 ruits, colors6 [57apple8, 7green86, 57grape8, purple86, 571lue1erry8, 71lue86] Notice how Python matched each of the fruits in our first list with its corresponding color in the second list. The zip() function itself returns a list, which we can use in our own for loops.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth, Poverty Reduction, and Inequality
    32691 At the Frontlines of Public Disclosure Authorized Development Reflections from the World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized EDITED BY INDERMIT S. GILL & TODD PUGATCH Public Disclosure Authorized THE WORLD BANK At the Frontlines of Development Reflections from the World Bank At the Frontlines of Development Reflections from the World Bank Edited by Indermit S. Gill and Todd Pugatch Washington, D.C. © 2005 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington,DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000 Internet www.worldbank.org E-mail [email protected] All rights reserved. 123408070605 The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Exec- utive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work.The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other informa- tion shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions: The material in this work is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law.The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • The Weak Link the Role of Local Institutions in Accountable Natural Resource Management
    OXFAM RESEARCH REPORT THE WEAK LINK THE ROLE OF LOCAL INSTITUTIONS IN ACCOUNTABLE NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TANZANIA COVER: Open-pit gold mines like this one bring high environmental and social costs to countries like Tanzania, and need to bring in revenues that can be used to offset negative effects. Brett Eloff / Oxfam America 2 Oxfam America | The Weak Link: The Role of Local Institutions in Accountable Resource Management, Tanzania CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 2 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 8 Sociopolitical and economic overview ............................................................ 10 Format of the report…………………………………………………………………11 2. Methods and conceptual framings ................................................................. 13 3. Revenue sharing in Tanzania ........................................................................ 15 Mining ............................................................................................................ 15 Oil and gas..................................................................................................... 17 Understanding revenue-sharing policy: Mining ............................................... 19 Understanding revenue-sharing policy: Petroleum, oil and gas ...................... 26 Accountability in revenue sharing ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AC Vol 45 No 9
    www.africa-confidential.com 30 April 2004 Vol 45 No 9 AFRICA CONFIDENTIAL TANZANIA 3 SUDAN Troubled isles The union between the mainland Mass murder and Zanzibar – 40 years old this Ten years after Rwanda’s genocide, the NIF regime kills and displaces week – remains a political hotspot, tens of thousands of civilians in Darfur – with impunity mainly because the ruling CCM has rigged two successive elections on Civilians in Darfur continue to die as a result of the National Islamic Front regime’s ethnic cleansing and the islands. Some hope that former in the absence of serious diplomatic pressure. United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan has warned OAU Secretary General Salim that international military intervention might be required to stop the slaughter in Darfur, while senior UN Ahmed Salim of Zanzibar will take officials refer to the NIF regime’s scorched earth policy as ‘genocide’ or ‘ethnic cleansing’. Yet last week over from President Mkapa next the UN Commission on Human Rights (UNOHCHR) in Geneva again refused to recommend strong year and negotiate a new settlement with the opposition CUF. action against Khartoum and suppressed its own highly critical investigation, which found that government agents had killed, raped and tortured civilians. On 23 April, the NIF exploited anti-Americanism to defeat a call from the United States and European MALAWI 4Union to reinstate a Special Rapporteur (SR) on Human Rights. At 2003’s annual session, Khartoum had successfully lobbied for the removal as SR of the German lawyer and former Interior Minister Gerhard Bingu the favourite Baum, an obvious candidate for enquiries in Darfur.
    [Show full text]
  • (Online Document) 1 BUNGE LA TANZANIA
    Nakala ya Mtandao (Online Document) BUNGE LA TANZANIA _____________ MAJADILIANO YA BUNGE ______________ MKUTANO WA ISHIRINI Kikao cha Sita – Tarehe 18 Mei, 2015 (Kikao Kilianza Saa Tatu Asubuhi) D U A Spika (Mhe Anne S. Makinda) Alisoma Dua SPIKA: Waheshimiwa Wabunge, kutokana na maagizo yaliyotolewa humu wiki iliyopita kuhusu Hati za kuwasilisha Mezani. Kama kuna kundi lolote, Kamati, Serikali au Upinzani hawajaleta Hati hazisomwi. Waziri wa Nchi, Ofisi ya Makamu wa Rais! Mheshimiwa Naibu Waziri! HATI ZILIZOWASILISHWA MEZANI Hati zifuatazo ziliwasilishwa mezani na:- NAIBU WAZIRI, OFISI YA MAKAMU WA RAIS (MUUNGANO): Randama za Makadirio ya Matumizi kwa Ofisi ya Makamu wa Rais na Taasisi zake kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2015/2016. WAZIRI WA NCHI, OFISI YA RAIS, MENEJIMENTI YA UTUMISHI WA UMMA: Hotuba ya Bajeti ya Waziri wa Nchi, Ofisi ya Rais (Menejimenti ya Utumishi wa Umma) pamoja na (Utawala Bora) kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2015/2016. WAZIRI WA NCHI, OFISI YA RAIS (MAHUSIANO NA URATIBU): Hotuba ya Waziri wa Nchi, Ofisi ya Rais (Mahusiano na Uratibu) kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2015/2016. MHE. JASSON S. RWEIKIZA - MWENYEKITI WA KAMATI YA KUDUMU YA BUNGE YA KATIBA, SHERIA NA UTAWALA: 1 Nakala ya Mtandao (Online Document) Taarifa ya Kamati ya Kudumu ya Bunge ya Katiba, Sheria na Utawala kuhusu utekelezaji wa majukumu ya Ofisi ya Rais (Menejimenti ya Utumishi wa Umma), (Utawala Bora na Mahusiano na Uratibu) kwa mwaka wa fedha 2014/2015 pamoja na maoni ya Kamati kuhusu Makadirio ya Mapato na Matumizi ya Ofisi hiyo kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2015/2016. MHE. ESTHER N. MATIKO - MSEMAJI MKUU WA KAMBI RASMI YA UPINZANI KWA OFISI YA RAIS, MENEJIMENTI YA UTUMISHI WA UMMA, UTAWALA BORA NA MAHUSIANO NA URATIBU: Taarifa ya Msemaji Mkuu wa Kambi ya Upinzani Bungeni Kuhusu Makadirio ya Matumizi ya Fedha kwa Ofisi ya Rais (Menejimenti ya Utumishi wa Umma, Utawala Bora na Mahusiano na Uratibu kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2015/2016 SPIKA: Waheshimiwa Wabunge tunaanza maswali Ofisi ya Rais, Mahusiano na Uratibu, Mheshimiwa Engineer Athumani Mfutakamba.
    [Show full text]
  • State Coercion and Freedom in Tanzania
    STATE COERCION AND FREEDOM IN TANZANIA O' by U. Issa G. Shivji Human & People's Rights Monograph Series No. 8 Lesotho 1990 STATE COERCION AND FREEDOM IN TANZANIA I by Issa G. Shivji Human & People's Rights Monograph Series No. 8 Institute of Southern African Studies National University of Lesotho P.O. Roma 180 Lesotho 1990 The ISAS Human and Peoples’ Rights Project is supported by the Ford Foundation. It is a regional research project drawing on academic resources in the Southern African region. The series has been edited by NUL/ISAS staff members. First Published in Lesotho, through the National University of Lesotho’s Institute of Southern African Studies, 1990. This publication is set in 10 point Times. Pre-press proof were prepared by using DTP technology. © Copyright Reserved by ISAS/NUL 1990 The views expressed herein are attributable to the Author. Neither ISAS nor NUL hold responsibility for them. lypesetting by Epic Printers Maseru. Lesotho CONTENTS Cases and Statutes iii Acknowledgments x Preface xi INTRODUCTION: COERCION AND CONSENSUS IN LAW 1 Chapter One ORGANS OFCOERCION AND RIGHT TO LIFE AND LIBERTY 9 A. Right to Life and Liberty 9 B. State Coercion 13 C. Organs of Coercion 14 1. People’s Militia 14 2. ‘Traditional Armies’ 16 3. The National Service 18 4. The Field Force Unit 19 Chapter Two LEGAL BUT ILLEGITIMATE COERCION - 1 25 A. Capital and Corporal Punishment 25 B. Collective Punishment 29 C. Witchcraft 30 D. Force against the Unemployed 31 and Vagrancy Laws Case Study l:‘Round-ups’ 33 i Chapter Three LEGAL BUT ILLEGITIMATE COERCION - II 43 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotuba Ya Waziri Wa Ulinzi Na Jeshi La Kujenga Taifa Mheshimiwa Dkt
    HOTUBA YA WAZIRI WA ULINZI NA JESHI LA KUJENGA TAIFA MHESHIMIWA DKT. HUSSEIN ALI MWINYI (MB) KUHUSU MAPITIO NA MWELEKEO WA KAZI ZA WIZARA NA MAKADIRIO YA MAPATO NA MATUMIZI YA FEDHA KWA MWAKA 2016/17 1 2 UTANGULIZI 1. Mheshimiwa Spika, kufuatia taarifa iliyowasilishwa leo Bungeni na Mwenyekiti wa Kamati ya Kudumu ya Bunge ya Mambo ya Nje, Ulinzi na Usalama, naomba kutoa hoja kwamba Bunge lako Tukufu sasa likubali kupokea, kujadili na kupitia Mpango na Makadirio ya Mapato na Matumizi ya Wizara ya Ulinzi na Jeshi la Kujenga Taifa kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2016/17. 2. Mheshimiwa Spika, awali ya yote, naomba kumshukuru Mwenyezi Mungu, mwingi wa rehema kwa kulijalia Taifa letu na wananchi wake wote kwa kutuvusha salama katika mchakato wote wa uchaguzi Mkuu wa Rais, Wabunge na Madiwani wa mwaka 2015. Watanzania tunayo kila sababu ya kujivunia kuwa Uchaguzi Mkuu huo ambao kikalenda ni wa tano tangu kurejeshwa kwa mfumo wa demokrasia ya Vyama vingi mwaka 1992, uliendeshwa na kuhitimishwa kwa amani, utulivu na mshikamano mkubwa kinyume na maadui wetu wa ndani na nje ya nchi waliotutabiria mabaya. Kwa muktadha huo, nachukua fursa hii kutoa pongezi kwa Serikali ya Awamu ya Nne chini ya Uongozi wa Mhe. Dkt. Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete kwa kuendeleza misingi ya umoja, mshikamano na amani ya nchi yetu. Aidha, nawapongeza: aliyekuwa Makamu wa Rais, Mhe. Dkt. Mohamed Gharib Bilal; na Waziri Mkuu Mstaafu, Mhe. Mizengo Kayanza Peter 1 Pinda kwa kusimamia utekelezaji mzuri wa Ilani ya Uchaguzi ya Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) ya mwaka 2010-2015. Pia, nawapongeza Mhe. Anne Semamba Makinda, Spika Mstaafu, akisaidiana na Mhe.
    [Show full text]
  • Veronika Nad
    2015 ARBEITSPAPIER – WORKING PAPER 164 Veronika Nad Father of the Nation Tanzania’s Independence Jubilee and the Nyerere Myth ARBEITSPAPIERE DES INSTITUTS FÜR ETHNOLOGIE UND AFRIKASTUDIEN WORKING PAPERS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY AND AFRICAN STUDIES AP IFEAS 164/2015 Herausgegeben von / The Working Papers are edited by: Institut für Ethnologie und Afrikastudien, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Forum 6, D-55099 Mainz, Germany. Tel. +49-6131-3923720; Email: [email protected]; http://www.ifeas.uni-mainz.de http://www.ifeas.uni-mainz.de/92.php Geschäftsführende Herausgeberin / Managing Editor: Konstanze N’Guessan ([email protected]) Copyright remains with the author. Zitierhinweis / Please cite as: Veronika Nad (2015): Father of the Nation. Tanzania’s Independence Jubilee and the Nyerere Myth. Arbeitspapiere des Instituts für Ethnologie und Afrikastudien der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz (Working Papers of the Department of Anthropology and African Studies of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz) 164. Veronika Nad: Father of the Nation: Tanzania’s Independence Jubilee and the Nyerere Myth. Zusammenfassung Im Dezember 2011 feierte die Nation Tansania den 50. Jahrestag der Unabhängigkeit des tansanischen Festlands von britischer Kolonialherrschaft. Dabei offenbarte sich im Zuge der Inszenierung nationaler Symbole und Narrative, dass insbesondere der nationale Gründervater und erste Präsident ein wichtiges nationales Bezugsmerkmal auf verschiedenen Ebenen darstellt, obwohl dieser im kollektiven Gedächtnis über lange Jahre in Ungnade gefallen war. Die vorliegende Arbeit erörtert, wie sich die „Rückkehr“ Nyereres auf die politischen Bühnen des Landes seit seinem Tod im Jahr 1999 in Form eines nationalen Symbols vollzogen hat, und wie seine Person und politisches Vermächtnis im Kontext der Unabhängigkeitsfeiern 2011 erinnert wurden.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Responsible Democratic Government
    TOWARDS RESPONSIBLE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT Executive Powers and Constitutional Practice in Tanzania 1962-1992 Jwani Timothy Mwaikusa Thesis Submitted to the University of London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1995 Law Department School of Oriental and African Studies ProQuest Number: 11010551 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11010551 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT With independence in 1961, the British system of Parliamentary government, incorporating the principle of responsible government, was formally adopted in Tanzania. But within only one year that system was discarded first, by adopting a Republican Constitution with an executive President in 1962, and then by adopting a one-party state system of government in 1965. The one-party system reached the height of prominence through the concept of "Party Supremacy", and dominated constitutional practice for a whole generation before giving way to demands for greater freedom and democracy through competitive politics in 1992. Throughout this time, however, the preambles to successive constitutions proclaimed that the government in Tanzania was responsible to a freely elected Parliament representative of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • BTI 2016 | Tanzania Country Report
    BTI 2016 | Tanzania Country Report Status Index 1-10 5.58 # 62 of 129 Political Transformation 1-10 6.15 # 59 of 129 Economic Transformation 1-10 5.00 # 80 of 129 Management Index 1-10 5.14 # 60 of 129 scale score rank trend This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2016. It covers the period from 1 February 2013 to 31 January 2015. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of political management in 129 countries. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016 — Tanzania Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2016. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. BTI 2016 | Tanzania 2 Key Indicators Population M 51.8 HDI 0.488 GDP p.c., PPP $ 2591.2 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 3.2 HDI rank of 187 159 Gini Index 37.8 Life expectancy years 61.5 UN Education Index 0.426 Poverty3 % 76.1 Urban population % 30.9 Gender inequality2 0.553 Aid per capita $ 68.3 Sources (as of October 2015): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2015 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2014. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.10 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary During the period under review, some progress was achieved regarding democracy, social welfare and economic development. The country has a stable political system, dominated by the former state party Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM).
    [Show full text]