Indians in Oregon Today

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Indians in Oregon Today INDIANS IN OREGON TODAY OREGON MIDDLE SCHOOL – HIGH SCHOOL CURRICULUM Oregon Department of Education Rob Saxton, Deputy Superintendent of Public Instruction 255 Capitol St. NE Salem, OR 97310-0203 INDIANS IN OREGON TODAY OREGON MIDDLE SCHOOL – HIGH SCHOOL CURRICULUM Floy Pepper, Writer Oregon Department of Education Division of Special Student Services, Federal Programs Jerry Fuller, Associate Superintendent Robin A. Butterfield, Specialist Indian Education 2004 REVISIONS: Lou Farrow Andrea Morgan Assistant Director Social Sciences Curriculum Confederated Tribes of Umatilla Indian Oregon Department of Education Reservation Brenda Frank Minerva Soucie Education/Employment Director Education Director Klamath Tribe Burns-Paiute Tribe Marion Mercier Brad Victor Education Division Manager Indian Education Specialist Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Oregon Department of Education Front cover: Konaway Nika Tillicum, Southern Oregon University 1 It is the policy of the State Board of Education and a priority of the Oregon Department of Education that there will be no discrimination or harassment on the grounds of race, color, sex, marital status, religion, national origin, age, or handicap in any educational programs, activities, or employment. Persons having questions about equal opportunity and nondiscrimination should contact the State Superintendent of Public Instruction at the Oregon Department of Education. The original document was produced by the Publications and Multimedia Center Oregon Department of Education Salem, Oregon 97310-0290 All or any part of this document may be photocopied for educational purposes without permission from the Oregon Department of Education. 2004 REVISION: Produced by Student Learning and Partnerships and Educational Improvement & Innovation, Oregon Department of Education Government-to-Government Indian Education Cluster Oregon Indian Education Association 2014 REVISION: Produced by Instruction, Standards, Assessment and Accountability Unit and Equity Unit, Office of Learning, Oregon Department of Education 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Oregon Department of Education, Indian Education/Civil Rights Program sponsored the development of these materials in cooperation with the Oregon Indian Education Association. We truly appreciate the time, effort, and ideas contributed by the Oregon Indian Curriculum Committee. Specifically, individuals involved with the development include: Dianna Kale Twila Souers Norrine Smokey-Smith Jim Thornton Robin Butterfield Charles Calica Esther Stutzman Carol Minugh Nickolee Van Noort Robey Clark Jeff Zucker Dawn Smith Denise Mason Floy Pepper Freida Kirk Ernie St. Germaine Anita Chisholm In addition, the program would like to acknowledge the following teachers: Margaret Cavinaw Mary Ellen Showalter Lauren A. Usher Chrisann Deurwaarder Nancy B. Kuney Susan Knapp Special thanks to Floy Pepper who wrote the major portion of the materials, and Norrine Smokey-Smith and Robey Clark who helped edit them. The contents of this document were prepared with the support of the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights funds. However, any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed herein are those of the Oregon Indian Curriculum Committee and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Education. For future revisions, please take time to respond to the survey concerning the use of these materials. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Acknowledgements……………………………………………………… 3 Introduction……………………………………………………………….. 6 Concept 1. Indians in Oregon Today……………………………… 14 Map – Oregon Indian Communities………………………………………. 18 Chart – Oregon Indian Tribal Enrollment……………………………… 19 Chart – Federally-Recognized Tribes……………………………………. 20 Activities………………………………………………………………………………… 22 Concept 2. A Special Relationship with the U.S. Government 25 Activities…………………………………………………………………………………. 30 Concept 3. The Impact and Changes Brought About by Newcomers to this Land………………………………………… 33 Map – Shrinking Indian Lands……………………………………………….. 34 Activities…………………………………………………………………………………. 38 Concept 4. Indian Roles in Oregon’s Culture and Economy and the World………………………………………………………. 41 Map – Oregon Indian Population……………………………………………. 42 Activities…………………………………………………………………………………. 47 Concept 5. Indian Tribes Have Different Languages, Customs, Ways of Life…………………………………………………………. 52 Map – Location of Federally-Recognized tribes in Oregon……. 54 Map – Natural and Cultural Areas of Oregon………………………… 54 Chart – Summary of Cultural Areas………………………………………. 60 Map – Oregon Indian Languages…………………………………………… 62 Activities…………………………………………………………………………………. 63 Concept 6. Reservations Caused Many Changes for Indian People…………………………………………………………………. 67 Map – Displacement of Oregon Indians…………………………………. 71 Activities………………………………………………………………………………….. 75 Concept 7. Termination Affected Indian Tribes in Oregon…. 78 Chart – Reservations and Restoration……………………………………. 82 Activities………………………………………………………………………………….. 83 Concept 8. Different Forms of Government for Indian People 85 Activities………………………………………………………………………………….. 89 4 Concept 9. Indian People and Respect for the Environment.. 91 Chart – Yearly Cycles……………………………………………………………….. 93 Activities……………………………………………………………………………………. 95 Concept 10. The Importance of Indian Hunting, Gathering, Fishing Rights………………………………………………………... 99 Activities……………………………………………………………………………………. 103 Map – Oregon Rivers and Lakes………………………………………………. 105 Appendix A. American Indian/Alaskan Native U.S. Historical Timeline………………………………………………………………… 106 Appendix B. Glossary……………………………………………………... 111 Appendix C. Specific Curriculum References……………………… 118 Appendix D. Other Resources………………………………………….. 120 Appendix E. Oregon Indian Treaties…………………………………. 123 Acknowledgements for Art Work………………………………………. 138 5 INTRODUCTION The main purpose of this publication is to provide current, accurate information to teachers and students about the Indian tribes living in the state of Oregon. Too often information about Indian tribes is stereotypic, inaccurate, and outdated. A number of Indian tribes have worked on the development of this document, using the Oregon Indians: Culture, History, and Current Affairs – An Atlas and Introduction, a publication approved by the tribes of Oregon. It is planned that this information will be updated and revised as needed. Students may need to locate additional sources of information in order to gain first-hand experience with a variety of Indian tribes. Such resources include the Oregon Directory of American Indian Resources obtained from the Legislative Commission on Indian Services, (503) 986-1067, www.leg.state.or.us/cis; or the Oregon Department of Education, Indian Education, (503) 947-5810www.ode.state.or.us/search/results/?id=112. GUIDELINES FOR TEACHING ABOUT INDIAN CULTURE The following guidelines were chosen to prevent teachers from teaching stereotypic lessons about Indian culture. The usual approach is to introduce students to Indian tribes using geographic regional groups, emphasizing historical culture and providing a variety of material objects (i.e., baskets, beadwork, totem poles, etc.) for students to touch and examine. Though this approach is probably better than nothing, it tends to create stereotypic images about Indians. They are not seen as contemporary or multi-faceted human beings. Therefore, some alternatives are suggested to change the emphasis of cultural lessons. Some guidelines to use when deciding what content information is culturally appropriate for Indian students are: Concentrate on the contemporary Indian and community rather than historical facts. Historical information is important, but it has been overemphasized. Simply reverse the focus: contemporary first. Focus on the Tribal group nearest the school. An understanding of the local Indian community will give a better perspective on generalizations made about Indians regionally and nationally. If many tribes are represented in one classroom, it is still better to begin with one tribe which is close to the school community or one of which a student is a member, than it is to begin talking about Indians in generalizations, as if they fit into one homogeneous group. The diversity of Tribal groups should be emphasized. 6 Attempt to deal with real life, including controversial issues. It is more valuable for students to discuss some of the fishing rights issues, trust responsibility, drug and alcohol abuse, and health issues than it is for students to only examine artifacts or only visit a museum. Invite Indian and non-Indian tribes into the classroom to present all sides of an issue. Concentrate more on the processes of Indian life, rather than the products. When children are given only the end products of things without having experienced the processes they don’t learn about the skills and knowledge that make up the content for those products. Social relationships and value systems are more appropriate reflections of culture than physical artifacts. A problem directly related to the confusion of the Native past and present is the misguided emphasis upon visible material. Undoubtedly, an exhibition of glistening quills, glossy beads, colorful feathers, and beautiful Native costumes is appealing and exciting to children. One can certainly understand why teachers have been prone to teach “Indian culture” in such a limited fashion. But this selective treatment of “culture” negates a wealth of intangibles that is a vital and integral part of any culture. It
Recommended publications
  • History of the Siletz This Page Intentionally Left Blank for Printing Purposes
    History of the Siletz This page intentionally left blank for printing purposes. History of the Siletz Historical Perspective The purpose of this section is to discuss the historic difficulties suffered by ancestors of the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians (hereinafter Siletz Indians or Indians). It is also to promote understanding of the ongoing effects and circumstances under which the Siletz people struggle today. Since time immemorial, a diverse number of Indian tribes and bands peacefully inhabited what is now the western part of the State of Oregon. The Siletz Tribe includes approximately 30 of these tribes and bands.1 Our aboriginal land base consisted of 20 million acres located from the Columbia to the Klamath River and from the Cascade Range to the Pacific Ocean. The arrival of white settlers in the Oregon Government Hill – Siletz Indian Fair ca. 1917 Territory resulted in violations of the basic principles of constitutional law and federal policy. The 1787 Northwest Ordinance set the policy for treatment of Indian tribes on the frontier. It provided as follows: The utmost good faith shall always be observed toward the Indians; their land and property shall never be taken from them without their consent; and in the property, rights, and liberty, they never shall be invaded, or disturbed, unless in just, and lawful wars authorized by Congress; but laws founded in justice and humanity shall from time to time be made for preventing wrongs being done to them, and for preserving peace, and friendship with them. 5 Data was collected from the Oregon 012.5 255075100 Geospatial Data Clearinghouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Country Welcome To
    Travel Guide To OREGON Indian Country Welcome to OREGON Indian Country he members of Oregon’s nine federally recognized Ttribes and Travel Oregon invite you to explore our diverse cultures in what is today the state of Oregon. Hundreds of centuries before Lewis & Clark laid eyes on the Pacific Ocean, native peoples lived here – they explored; hunted, gathered and fished; passed along the ancestral ways and observed the ancient rites. The many tribes that once called this land home developed distinct lifestyles and traditions that were passed down generation to generation. Today these traditions are still practiced by our people, and visitors have a special opportunity to experience our unique cultures and distinct histories – a rare glimpse of ancient civilizations that have survived since the beginning of time. You’ll also discover that our rich heritage is being honored alongside new enterprises and technologies that will carry our people forward for centuries to come. The following pages highlight a few of the many attractions available on and around our tribal centers. We encourage you to visit our award-winning native museums and heritage centers and to experience our powwows and cultural events. (You can learn more about scheduled powwows at www.traveloregon.com/powwow.) We hope you’ll also take time to appreciate the natural wonders that make Oregon such an enchanting place to visit – the same mountains, coastline, rivers and valleys that have always provided for our people. Few places in the world offer such a diversity of landscapes, wildlife and culture within such a short drive. Many visitors may choose to visit all nine of Oregon’s federally recognized tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 588-Aug. 13, 1954 [68 St At
    724 PUBLIC LAW 588-AUG. 13, 1954 [68 ST AT. Public Law 588 CHAPTER 733 August 13, 1954 AN ACT [S. 2746] To provide for the termination of Federal supervision over the property of certain tribes and bands of Indians located in western Oregon and the indi­ vidual members thereof, and for other purposes. Be it enmted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the Oregon Indians. Termination o f United States of America in Congress assembled^ That the purpose Federal super - of this Act is to provide for the termination of Federal supervision vision. over the trust and restricted property of certain tribes and bands of Indians located in western Oregon and the individual members thereof, for the disposition of federally owned property acquired or withdrawn for the administration of the affairs of such Indians, and for a termination of Federal services furnished such Indians because of their status as Indians. Definitions. SEC. 2. For the purposes of this Act: (a) "Tribe" means any of the tribes, bands, groups, or communities of Indians located west of the Cascade Mountains in Oregon, including the following: Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community, Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians, Alsea, Applegate Creek, Cala- pooya, Chaftan, Chempho, Chetco, Chetlessington, Chinook, Clacka­ mas, Clatskanie, Clatsop, Clowwewalla, Coos, Cow Creek, Euchees, Galic Creek, Grave, Joshua, Karok, Kathlamet, Kusotony, Kwatami or Sixes, Lakmiut, Long Tom Creek, Lower Coquille, Lower Umpqua, Maddy, Mackanotin, Mary's River, Multnomah, Munsel Creek, Nal- tunnetunne, Nehalem, Nestucca, Northern Molalla, Port Orford, Pud­ ding River, Rogue River, Salmon River, Santiam, Scoton, Shasta, Shasta Costa, Siletz, Siuslaw, Skiloot, Southern Molalla, Takelma, Tillamook, Tolowa, Tualatin, Tututui, Upper Coquille, Upper Ump­ qua, Willamette Tumwater, Yamhill, Yaquina, and Yoncalla; (b) "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Interior, (c) "Lands" means real property, interest therein, or improve­ ments thereon, and includes water rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Visit Lesson Three
    I was raised in the traditional manner of my people, meaning that I learned early Cathlamet Clatsop in my life how to survive. Skilloot Clatskanie Nehalem Wh So I grew up speaking my language, at natur ltnom al res Mu ah ources did Tillamook Tribes tr ade with each other? learned how to forage for wild foods, T u a la tin tuc Nes ca Walla Walla Chafan (Dog River) Cascades (Dalles) digging for roots and bulbs with my mother Salmon River Yamhill Clackamas Wasco Ahantchuyuk Siletz and her aunties, trapping small game Luckiamute Tenino Yaquina Santiam Wyam with my grandfather and learning Chepenefa Tygh Alsea Chemapho Northern John Day food preparations early in my life. Tsankupi Molalla Nez Perce Siuslaw enino — Minerva Teeman Soucie Long Tom Mohawk T Wayampam Burns Paiute Tribe Elder Chafan ( ) Umatilla Cayuse The Grande Ronde Valley Kalawatset Winefelly was our Eden. Everything was there Hanis Yoncalla Miluk Southern Wa-dihtchi-tika for the people . The camas root was in Molalla Upper ppe Coquille U r Umpqua Kwatami Hu-nipwi-tika (Walpapi) abundance. When the seasons came there, Yukichetunne Tutuni Cow Creek onotun sta Mik ne Co sta the people from here went over to Chemetunne ha S Taltushtuntede Chetleshin (Galice) Pa-tihichi-tika ishtunnetu Kwa nne Takelma Wada-tika the Grande Ronde Valley and dug the camas. Chetco Upland Takelma D Klamath Tolowa aku Yapa-tika — Atway Tekips (Dan Motanic) be te de Agai-tika Shasta Modo c Gidi-tika MAJOR NATIVE AMERICAN LANGUAGES OF OREGON UTO-AZTECAN Northern Paiute Gwi-nidi-ba Wa-dihtchi-tiki, Hu-nipwi-tika,
    [Show full text]
  • Mary's River Kalapuyan: a Descriptive Phonology
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 5-1976 Mary's River Kalapuyan: A Descriptive Phonology Yvonne P. Hajda Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Linguistic Anthropology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Hajda, Yvonne P., "Mary's River Kalapuyan: A Descriptive Phonology" (1976). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 2491. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.2488 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. I 1. \ i I I AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Yvonne P. Hajda for the Master of Arts in t-· .Anthropology presented May 11, 1976. Title: Mary's River Kalapuyan: A Descriptive Phonology. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COMMITTEE: Pierce David H. French The thesis is an attempt to apply procedures of aescriptive linguis- tic analysis to a body of mater~al phonetically transcribed by Leo J. Frachtenberg in the Mary's River dialect of ·the central Kalapuyan lan- guage. In 191~-14, Frachtenberg collected thirteen volumes of myth texts ~ .. in Mary's River, twelve from.William Hartless and one from Grace Wheeler; I • in addition, there were nQtes to the texts, three volumes of grannnatical notes, and some ~thnographic material. The phonetic transcription was. carried out in the pre-phonemic tr·adition of recording everything the speaker said as accurately as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Ceremony: Regalia of Native Oregon
    The Art of Ceremony: Regalia of Native Oregon September 28, 2008 – January 18, 2009 Hallie Ford Museum of Art Willamette University Teachers Guide This guide is to help teachers prepare students for a field trip to the exhibition, The Art of Ceremony: Regalia of Native Oregon and offer ideas for leading self-guided groups through the galleries. Teachers, however, will need to consider the level and needs of their students in adapting these materials and lessons. Goals • To introduce students to the history and culture of Oregon’s nine federally recognized tribal communities • To introduce students to the life ways, traditions, rituals and ceremonies of each of the nine tribal communities through their art and art forms (ancient techniques, materials, preparation, and cultural guidelines and practices) • To understand the relevance of continuity to a culture Objectives Students will be able to • Discuss works of art and different art forms in relation to the history and culture of Oregon’s nine federally recognized tribal communities • Discuss various traditional art forms as reflected in the objects and performances represented in the exhibition • Identify a number of traditional techniques, including weaving, beadwork and carving • Discuss tradition and renewal in the art forms of the nine tribal communities and their relationship to the life ways, traditions and rituals of the communities • Make connections to other disciplines Preparing for the tour: • If possible, visit the exhibition on your own beforehand. • Using the images (print out transparencies or sets for students, create a bulletin board, etc.) and information in the teacher packet, create a pre-tour lesson plan for the classroom to support and complement the gallery experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Deaths: the Near Destruction of Western
    DAVID G. LEWIS Four Deaths The Near Destruction of Western Oregon Tribes and Native Lifeways, Removal to the Reservation, and Erasure from History THE NOTIONS OF DEATH and genocide within the tribes of western Oregon are convoluted. History partially records our removal and near genocide by colonists, but there is little record of the depth of these events — of the dramatic scale of near destruction of our peoples and their cultural life ways. Since contact with newcomers, death has come to the tribes of western Oregon in a variety of ways — through epidemic sicknesses, followed by attempted genocide, forced marches onto reservations, reduction of land holdings, broken treaty promises, attempts to destroy tribal culture through assimilation, and the termination of federal recognition of sovereign, tribal status. Death, then, has been experienced literally, culturally, legally, and even in scholarship; for well over a century, tribal people were not consulted and were not adequately represented in historical writing. Still, the people have survived, restoring their recognized tribal status and building structures to maintain and regain the people’s health and cultural well-being. This legacy of death and survival is shared by all the tribes of Oregon, though specific details vary, but the story is not well known or understood by the state’s general public. Such historical ignorance is another kind of death — one marked by both myth and silence. An especially persistent myth is the notion that there lived and died a “last” member of a particular tribe or people. The idea began in the late nineteenth century, when social scientists who saw population declines at the reservations feared that the tribes would die off before scholars could collect their data and complete their studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon's History
    Oregon’s History: People of the Northwest in the Land of Eden Oregon’s History: People of the Northwest in the Land of Eden ATHANASIOS MICHAELS Oregon’s History: People of the Northwest in the Land of Eden by Athanasios Michaels is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. Contents Introduction 1 1. Origins: Indigenous Inhabitants and Landscapes 3 2. Curiosity, Commerce, Conquest, and Competition: 12 Fur Trade Empires and Discovery 3. Oregon Fever and Western Expansion: Manifest 36 Destiny in the Garden of Eden 4. Native Americans in the Land of Eden: An Elegy of 63 Early Statehood 5. Statehood: Constitutional Exclusions and the Civil 101 War 6. Oregon at the Turn of the Twentieth Century 137 7. The Dawn of the Civil Rights Movement and the 179 World Wars in Oregon 8. Cold War and Counterculture 231 9. End of the Twentieth Century and Beyond 265 Appendix 279 Preface Oregon’s History: People of the Northwest in the Land of Eden presents the people, places, and events of the state of Oregon from a humanist-driven perspective and recounts the struggles various peoples endured to achieve inclusion in the community. Its inspiration came from Carlos Schwantes historical survey, The Pacific Northwest: An Interpretive History which provides a glimpse of national events in American history through a regional approach. David Peterson Del Mar’s Oregon Promise: An Interpretive History has a similar approach as Schwantes, it is a reflective social and cultural history of the state’s diversity. The text offers a broad perspective of various ethnicities, political figures, and marginalized identities.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Americans of the Rogue Valley
    An introduction to: Native Americans of the Rogue Valley Presented by: North Mountain Park Nature Center A division of the Ashland Parks and Recreation Department Version 4: May 2010 A Note on Authenticity This booklet is one piece of the North Mountain Park Nature Center’s interpretation relating to the role of Native Americans of the Rogue Valley on both an historic and ecological level. Although based on numerous ethnographies, historical accounts, archaeological records, and the opinions and statements of tribal people of today, this booklet is not meant to be a scholarly document. The purpose of this booklet is to form a general picture of what life was like for the Native Americans who lived in and around Ashland prior to contact with Euro-Americans, and their role as stewards of this land. In attempting this interpretation, certain challenges arose as to which tribes actually lived where, how they lived and what they believed. Most of this difficulty is related to the fact that the tribes of the Rogue Valley — the Shasta, Takelma and Athabaskans had a very short contact period with white settlers before being forcibly removed to reservations in northwest Oregon. Unfortunately, the few ethnographies that were conducted, which provide some of the best written accounts of how people lived, occurred long after the people were removed from their homeland and forced to relinquish their traditional way of life. It is hoped that this booklet will be a starting place for an ongoing dialogue between Native Americans and anyone interested in exploring how people can learn from the past while looking toward a better, more sustainable and more honorable future for everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • EIS-0386-DEIS-02-2007.Pdf
    Draft WWEC PEIS September 2007 DOCUMENT CONTENTS VOLUME I Executive Summary Chapter 1: Why Are Federal Agencies Proposing to Designate Energy Corridors in the West? Chapter 2: What Are the Alternatives Evaluated in This PEIS? Chapter 3: What Are the Potential Environmental Consequences of Corridor Designation and Land Use Plan Amendment? Chapter 4: How Are Cumulative Impacts Evaluated? Chapter 5: What Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Might Be Caused by Corridor Designation and Land Use Plan Amendment? Chapter 6: The Relationship between Local Short-Term Uses of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity Chapter 7: What Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources Would Be Involved with Implementation of the Alternatives? Chapter 8: List of Preparers Chapter 9: References Chapter 10: Glossary VOLUME II Appendix A: Proposed Land Use Plan Amendments Appendix B: Summary of Public Scoping Comments for the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, Designation of Energy Corridors on Federal Land in the 11 Western States (DOE/FS-0386) Appendix C: Tribal Consultation Appendix D: Federal and State Regulatory Requirements Potentially Applicable When Designating Energy Corridors Appendix E: Energy Transport Technologies and Hypothetical Energy Transport Projects Appendix F: Section 368 Corridor Parameters Appendix G: Sensitive Resource Areas That Would Be Intersected by Proposed West-wide Energy Corridors Appendix H: Geographic Information System Data Appendix I: Summary of WWEC PEIS Webcasts for Corridor Review and Revision, 6/19/06 to 4/24/07
    [Show full text]
  • The Takelma and Their Athapascan Neighbors: a New Ethnographic
    Dennis J. Gray The Takelma and Their Athapascan Neighbors A New Ethnographic Synthesis for the Upper Rogue River Area of Southwestern Oregon University of Oregon Anthropological Papers No. 37 1987 SOUTHERN OREGON STATE COLLEGE LIBRARY ASHLAND, OkEGON 97520 Cover drawing of Frances Johnson by Christine Jackson; Ashland, Oregon. Copyright 1987, Dennis J. Gray ii U PROSPECTUS This study synthesizes the available ethnographic and relevant archaeological data pertaining to the Native American groups who formerly occupied the upper Rogue River drainage of southwestern Oregon. The information presented concerns material, social, and religious aspects of aboriginal life as practiced by the Takelma of the Rogue River Valley, and their culturally akin Athapascan neighbors, the Da-du-be-te-de (Applegate Rivergroup) and the Tal-tuc-tun-te-da (Galice Creek group). The ethnographic material represents the time period immediately prior to the subjugation of these Native Americans, and their subsequent renoval from southwestern Oregon in the 1850s; however, this synthesis has applications to a much greater time period in regional prehistory. Significant new information, extracted from the field notes of J.P. Harrington, Melville Jacobs, and P. E. Goddard, adds to what has already been published concerning the lifeways of these Native Americans and clarifies certain territorial boundary questions. This study is intended to facilitate anthropological research into southwstern Oregon prehistory, and to suggest new directions for future research. ACKNOWLEDGEBMENTS I want to thank my friends and colleagues who gave of their time and energy to review earlier versions of this paper: Janet Joyer, Kathryn Winthrop, Jeff Lalande, David Brauner, Thomas McClintock, Melvin Aikens, Theodore Stern, and Joyce Smith.
    [Show full text]
  • A “Most Disastrous” Affair
    Southern Oregon University Laboratory of Anthropology Southern Oregon University Laboratory A “Most Disastrous” Affair The Battle of Hungry Hill, Historical Memory, and the Rogue River War MARK AXEL TVESKOV “Do you know the story of the Battle of Hungry Hill? A woman—Queen Mary — led the Native Americans from horseback, and her booming voice could be heard across the battlefield. They won that battle”1 — Coquille elder George Bundy Wasson Jr., 1994 IN EARLY NOVEMBER 1855, news reached the Willamette Valley of a defeat suffered by a force of Oregon territorial volunteers and two compa- nies of the U.S. Army’s First Regiment of U.S. Dragoons at the hands of the Takelma in the remote mountains of southern Oregon.2 A correspondent for the Oregon Statesman newspaper reported: The war in the South has become a real and earnest affair. The battle in the Grave Creek hills has proved most disastrous to our side. It is supposed that there were not more than 100 fighting Indians engaged in the action. On our side were over 300 volunteers and more than 100 regulars. The loss on the side of the Indians was very trifling, probably not more than 7 or 8 killed. The Indians had taken a position in the mountains, about 15 miles west of the road to Jacksonville — an almost inaccessible place. After two days of [the] hard- est kind of fighting the Indians were left in possession of the field. In about ten days it is proposed to renew the attack. The exterminators are rather down in the mouth.
    [Show full text]