Inner and South London Rail and Tube Alternatives Key To

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inner and South London Rail and Tube Alternatives Key To Alternative Routes from Horsham When services are severely disrupted, we will arrange for your ticket to be accepted as indicated below to get you to your destination. Rail replacement buses may be arranged in certain cases. Please listen to announcements for further information about this. The bus stop for service 23 towards Worthing is stop L outside the station The bus stop for services 23 and 200 towards Crawley and Gatwick Airport is stop K opposite the station The bus stop for service 74, 74A and 75 towards Christs Hospital is stop K outside the station The bus stop for service 93 towards Dorking is in the bus station in the town centre The bus stop for service 100 towards Pulborough is stop K opposite the station To: Suggested routes: Amberley There are no practical alternatives to this destination Arundel Bus 23 to Worthing then bus 700 Ashtead Bus 93 to Dorking then South West Trains Barnham Bus 23 to Worthing then Southern train Billingshurst Bus 100 Bognor Regis Bus 23 to Worthing then Southern train or bus 700 Boxhill & Westhumble Bus 93 to Dorking then bus 465 or South West Trains Cheam Bus 93 to Dorking, South West Trains to Epsom then bus 470 Chichester Bus 23 to Worthing then Southern train or bus 700 Christ's Hospital Bus 74, 74A or 75 Clapham Junction Southern train via Sutton, OR bus 200 to Gatwick Airport South terminal, then Southern train Coulsdon South Bus 200 to Gatwick Airport South terminal, then either Southern or Thameslink train OR bus 100, 400, 420 or 460 to Redhill then bus 405 Crawley Bus 23 Dorking Bus 93 Earlswood Bus 200 to Gatwick Airport South terminal, then bus 100, 400, 420 or 460 East Croydon Bus 200 to Gatwick Airport South terminal, then either Southern or Thameslink train OR bus 100, 400, 420 or 460 to Redhill then bus 405 (alight at Fairfield Halls for East Croydon station) Epsom Bus 93 to Dorking then South West Trains Ewell East Bus 93 to Dorking, South West Trains to Epsom then bus 470 Fareham Bus 23 to Worthing then Southern train or bus 700 Faygate Bus 23 or 200 Ford Bus 23 to Worthing then Southern train Gatwick Airport Bus 200 Havant Bus 23 to Worthing then Southern train or bus 700 Holmwood Bus 93 Horley Bus 200 to Gatwick Airport South terminal, then bus 20, 100, 400, 420 or 460 Ifield Bus 200 Leatherhead Bus 93 to Dorking then bus 465 or South West Trains Littlehampton Bus 23 to Worthing then Southern train or bus 700 Littlehaven Bus 200 London Bridge Southern train to Epsom, South West Trains to Waterloo then Jubilee line, OR bus 200 to Gatwick Airport South terminal, then either Southern or Thameslink train London Victoria Southern train via Sutton, OR bus 200 to Gatwick Airport South terminal, then either Southern or Gatwick Express train Merstham Bus 200 to Gatwick Airport South terminal, then either Southern or Thameslink train OR bus 100, 400, 420 or 460 to Redhill then bus 357, 405, 430 or 435 Ockley Bus 93 to Capel village Portsmouth Bus 23 to Worthing then Southern train or bus 700 Pulborough Bus 100 Purley Bus 200 to Gatwick Airport South terminal, then either Southern or Thameslink train OR bus 100, 400, 420 or 460 to Redhill then bus 405 Redhill Bus 200 to Gatwick Airport South terminal, then either Southern, Thameslink or Great Western Railway train, or bus 100, 400, 420 or 460 Salfords Bus 200 to Gatwick Airport South terminal, then bus 100, 400, 420 or 460 Southampton Bus 23 to Worthing then Southern train or bus 700 Sutton Bus 93 to Dorking, South West Trains to Epsom then bus 470 Three Bridges Bus 23 to Crawley, then bus 4, 5, 27, 37, 84, 100, 281, 291 or 400 Warnham Bus 93 to Warnham village For all bus routes in the table above you may have to buy a bus ticket and apply for a refund. Journeys via alternative routes may take longer than your normal Inner and South London rail Key to map journey or only operate at certain times. For rail journeys please check southernrailway.com or with National Rail Enquiries and for and Tube alternatives bus journeys please check with Traveline. The routes listed above National Rail are only suggestions. When services are severely disrupted your ticket will also be accepted on services of the following operators to Towards Watford Junction nterchange station LONDON EUSTON get to your destination: and Milton Keynes ondon idland LONDON KING’S CROSS LONDON ST PANCRAS ondon Overground INTERNATIONAL - Great Western Railway - London Midland Oxford Southeastern Bond Street Circus Farringdon - London Tramlink - Southeastern Shepherd’s Southern Bush Notting Hill Gate Green - South West Trains - London buses Park LONDON City Thameslink South West Trains Kensington Thameslink - London Overground - London Underground (Olympia) LONDON LONDON BLACKFRIARS - Southern - Thameslink Westminster CHARING CROSS Bank Station walking link Whitechapel LONDON Embankment LONDON Monument VICTORIA Waterloo CANNON London Underground East STREET LONDON LONDON BRIDGE Canada Tube station Delay Repay WATERLOO Water West Bakerloo line If your journey on Southern was delayed by 15 minutes or more, Brompton Surrey Quays Elephant & Castle entral line you can claim for compensation through the Delay Repay scheme. Vauxhall ircle line To claim, pick up a Delay Repay leaflet or fill in the online form at District line southernrailway.com/your-journey/customer-services/delay- Denmark Hill Jubilee line repay/ Clapham Stockwell Junction orthern line Brixton Peckham New New ictoria line Rye Cross Cross Balham Gate not all intermediate stations are shown Train operator Website Twitter National Rail Southern southernrailway.com @SouthernrailUK 03457 48 49 50 (24 hour) DR.CI.DIS.PREP.MATRIX.HRH.FEB.17.
Recommended publications
  • London Connections OFF-PEAK RAIL SERVICES
    Hertford East St Margarets Interchange Station Aylesbury, Banbury Aylesbury Milton Keynes, Luton Bedford, Stevenage, Letchworth, Welwyn Stevenage Harlow, Bishops Stortford, and Birmingham Northampton, Cambridge, Kings Lynn, Hertford Stansted Airport Limited services (in line colours) Wellingborough, Garden City Ware Rugby, Coventry, Kettering, Leicester, Huntingdon, Peterborough North and Cambridge and The North East Rye Limited service station (in colours) Birmingham and Nottingham, Derby Hatfield Bayford The North West House Escalator link and Sheffield Broxbourne Welham Green Cuffley Airport link Chesham Watford Bricket St Albans ST ALBANS HIGH WYCOMBE Amersham North Wood Abbey Brookmans Park Crews Hill Enfield Town Cheshunt Docklands Light Railway Watford WATFORD Cockfosters Theobalds Tramlink Garston How Park Potters Bar Gordon Hill Wagn Epping Beaconsfield JUNCTION Wood Street Radlett Grove Bus link Hadley Wood Oakwood Enfield Chase Railway Chalfont & Latimer Watford Bush Theydon Bois Croxley Hill UNDERGROUND LINES Seer Green Croxley High Street Silverlink County New Barnet Waltham Cross Green Watford Elstree & Borehamwood Southgate Grange Park Park Debden West Turkey Bakerloo Line Chorleywood Enfield Lock Gerrards Cross Oakleigh Park Arnos Grove Winchmore Hill Street Loughton Central Line Bus Link Stanmore Edgware High Barnet Bushey Southbury Brimsdown Buckhurst Hill Circle Line Denham Golf Club Rickmansworth Mill Hill Broadway Bounds Chiltern Moor Park Carpenders Park Totteridge & Whetstone Chingford Canons Park Burnt New Green
    [Show full text]
  • South Western Franchise Agreement
    _____ September 2006 THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT and STAGECOACH SOUTH WESTERN TRAINS LIMITED SOUTH WESTERN FRANCHISE AGREEMENT incorporating by reference the National Rail Franchise Terms (Second Edition) CONTENTS CLAUSE PAGE 1. INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS ............................................................................. 4 2. COMMENCEMENT .......................................................................................................... 5 3. TERM 5 4. GENERAL OBLIGATIONS ................................................................................................ 6 5. SPECIFIC OBLIGATIONS ................................................................................................. 6 6. COMMITTED OBLIGATIONS ......................................................................................... 48 7. SUPPLEMENTAL TERMS ............................................................................................... 48 8. RECALIBRATION OF THE BENCHMARKS ...................................................................... 49 9. DOCUMENTS IN THE AGREED TERMS .......................................................................... 49 10. ENTIRE AGREEMENT ................................................................................................... 49 APPENDIX 1 ........................................................................................................................... 52 Secretary of State Risk Assumptions (Clause 5.1(y)) ................................................. 52 APPENDIX
    [Show full text]
  • Class 460 Train Operating Manual
    Class 460 Train Operating Manual Produced by: Master Key Simulations Master Key Simulations Juniper Class 460 Operating Manual - Revision 3 © 2017 Introduction - Page 1 Index Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………3 Technical Specifications…………………………………………………………………..4 Rolling Stock……………………………………………………………………………….5 Cab Layout…………………………………………………………………………………9 Keyboard Controls……………………………………………………………………….17 Controls Description………………………………………………………….………….18 Train Monitoring System..……………………………………………………………….25 Cab Secure Radio……………….……………………………………………………….36 GSM-R Radio…………………….……………………………………………………….39 Train Protection & Warning System……………………………………………………42 Miniature Circuit Breakers……………………………………………………………….45 Safety Isolation & Cut-Out Switches……………………………...……………………47 Warning Indicator Panel…………………………………………………………………48 Door Release Panel……………………………………………………………………...49 Driving Instructions……………………………………………………………………….50 Included Scenarios……………………………………………………………………….54 Advanced Scenario Features…………………………………………………………...55 Summary & Credit………………………………………………………………………..56 Legend ♦ A red diamond indicates the system/feature being described is only partially simulated, or not simulated in its entirety. DISCLAIMER: This manual has been developed solely for use in connection with the Master Key Simulations Class 460 add-on for Train Simulator, and is for entertainment ONLY. It is NOT to be used for training or real-world application. Master Key Simulations Juniper Class 460 Operating Manual - Revision 3 © 2017 Index - Page 2 Introduction The Class
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal
    Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal Response by London Borough of Hounslow February 2003 Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal: Response by London Borough of Hounslow February 2003 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Context This submission constitutes the London Borough of Hounslow’s response to an invitation to provide initial comments on the Crossrail project’s proposal for a new corridor for Crossrail 1: Corridor 6 – Norbiton, via Old Oak Common, Acton, Chiswick, Richmond and Kingston. The submission considers the proposal in terms of service and amenity for the borough’s residents and businesses, and within the context of the Council’s published policies. In addition to the two options that constitute the Corridor 6 proposals, this submission provides two further options for Crossrail’s consideration. While the Council must record its disappointment that an effective period of less than two weeks was offered for preparation of this submission, the Council also wishes to record its appreciation for the assistance given by the Crossrail consultation team during the preparation of the submission. 1.2 Council Policies The London Borough of Hounslow Unitary Development Plan’s objectives relating to transport and land use development are summarised below: • To promote sustainable transport modes (walking, cycling, public and waterborne transport) which improves access for all members of the community and enhances public transport provision in London as a whole, while reducing car traffic and the demand for road space. • To encourage a pattern of land use, and provision of transport which minimises harm to the environment and reduces the need to travel, especially by car, whilst maximising development opportunities in the Borough.
    [Show full text]
  • National Rail Cycling by Train
    Introduction Chiltern Railways First Great Western GNER Most train companies allow cycles to be conveyed on their services provided they can be Tel: 08456 005 165 (information and telesales) www.chilternrailways.co.uk Tel: 08457 000125 www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk Tel: 08457 225 225 (Enquiries & Reservations) www.gner.co.uk (cycle booking form) accommodated safely. By making rail travel easier for cyclists, we are encouraging more travel London Marylebone – Aylesbury, Stratford-upon-Avon, Birmingham High speed and local services from London Paddington to Reading, London King’s Cross – Eastern Counties – Yorkshire – North East on the railway and offering a healthy and acceptable alternative to the car. This leaflet gives and Kidderminster Thames Valley, Bristol, South Wales, the Cotswolds, West of England England – Scotland plus Reading to Gatwick Airport. a summary of each train company’s policy for conveyance of cycles by train. It's no problem taking your cycle on our off-peak trains. But on Mondays to Fridays One cycle may be conveyed free of charge per ticket holder, subject to space being available. we're unable to convey cycles on our busiest trains. These are trains arriving at London High Speed Train services between London, South Wales and the West Country can We also convey tandems, but you need to reserve two cycle spaces. You must reserve before For full information contact either the appropriate train Marylebone or Birmingham Snow Hill between 07.45 and 10.00 and trains departing London accommodate up to six cycles and advance reservation is recommended, free of charge. travelling (maximum of 5 spaces available), and the earlier you book the more chance you company, or National Rail Enquiries at 08457 48 49 50 local However, reservation is compulsory Monday – Friday for all services rate call (textphone: 0845 60 50 600, Welsh-speaking enquiries: Marylebone or Birmingham Snow Hill between 16.30 and 19.30.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Monitoring Report on NATIONAL RAIL
    Performance monitoring report on NATIONAL RAIL PASSENGER SERVICES IN THE LONDON AREA Quarter 1 2002-03 (April to June 2002) Prepared by LTUC Research and Policy Team 6 Middle Street London EC1A 7JA October 2002 CONTENTS Section 1 Public performance measure (PPM) Section 2 Lost minutes Section 3 National passenger survey (NPS) (not reported this quarter) Section 4 Passengers in excess of capacity (PIXC) (not reported this quarter) Section 5 Passenger complaints (not reported this quarter) Section 6 Impartial retailing survey (not reported this quarter) Section 7 Glossary and definitions Annex A PPM results for Quarter 1 2001-02 (table) Annex B PPM results for Quarter 1 2001-02 (chart) Annex C 3-year PPM trends – all trains (chart) Annex D 3-year PPM trends – London and south east peak trains (chart) Annex E Lost minutes – Quarter 1 2002-03 (table) Annex F NPS results (not reported this quarter) Annex G Narrative commentaries supplied by the following operators : c2c, Chiltern, Connex South Eastern, First Great Eastern, Gatwick Express, Silverlink, South West Trains, Thameslink, West Anglia Great Northern, Anglia, First Great Western, Great North Eastern, Midland Mainline and Virgin West Coast. OVERVIEW OF QUARTER • Reliability of most London and south east operators has continued to improve but was still below the levels reached prior to the aftermath of the Hatfield derailment. • Wide variations between operators continued, ranging from 9% of trains delayed or cancelled to 24%. • Nearly all operators performed relatively well in weekday peaks, with only a slight decrease on c2c, First Great Eastern and Silverlink. • Longer-distance operators’ performance was 1.5% better than in the previous year and 2% better than in the preceding quarter.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIA FACTSHEET Stagecoach Group Plc Is a Leading International
    MEDIA FACTSHEET Stagecoach Group plc is a leading international public transport group, with extensive operations in the UK, United States and Canada. The company was founded by Chief Executive Sir Brian Souter and his sister, Ann Gloag, in Perth, Scotland, in 1980 and has been listed on the London Stock Exchange since 1993. The Group has a balanced portfolio of deregulated and contracted bus and rail businesses and a strong track- record of transport innovation. Stagecoach provides greener, smarter travel for millions of people every day, delivering vital links to employment, education, health facilities and leisure activities. Registered Office: 10 Dunkeld Road Perth PH1 5TW Scotland Registered Number: 100764 Ticker Symbol: SGC.L Our business: Stagecoach Group employs around 35,000 people in the UK and North America and runs around 13,000 buses, coaches, trains and trams. We are one of UK’s biggest bus and coach operators. Around 2.5 million passengers travel on Stagecoach's 8,100 buses every day on a network stretching from south-west England to the Highlands and Islands of Scotland. The company's business includes major city bus operations in London, Liverpool, Newcastle, Hull, Manchester, Oxford, Sheffield and Cambridge. Stagecoach is also a major UK rail operator, running the South West Trains, Island Line and East Midlands Trains networks. The Group is also a major tram operator, running a 28km system in Sheffield. In North America, Stagecoach businesses include commuter/transit services, inter-city services, tour and charter, sightseeing and school bus operations, principally through its Coach USA and Coach Canada brands.
    [Show full text]
  • Island Line – Technical Advisory
    Island Line – Technical Advisory Warwick Lowe Hugh Chaplain Rail Planning Atkins 16 September 2015 Island Line Franchise 1 Document Control Revision Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date IoW Document - First Draft LPA PS SF HC 04th September 2015 IoW Document - Revised Draft LPA PS SF HC 07th September 2015 IoW Document - Final LPA PS SF HC 11th September 2015 IoW Document – For Members LPA PS SF HC 14th September 2015 Disclaimer This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Isle of Wight information and use in relation to Technical Advisory for the Island Line Franchise. Atkins take no further responsibility for the use of this data by external parties. Island Line Franchise Contents 1) Overview of the current franchise 2) Positioning of the Island Line 3) Key financials 4) Main financial drivers 5) Integration and competition 6) Rail franchising 7) Five alternatives for consideration 8) Themes for discussion Island Line Franchise 16 September 2015 3 Current franchise Please note that the financials quoted are estimates only based on combination of public information and Atkins’ judgement. They should not be quoted outside of this presentation or without this caveat. Island Line Franchise 16 September 2015 4 Overview of the current franchise 1: Island Line operator • Island Line part of a wider rail franchise, South West Trains • South West (SW) rail franchise administrated by the Department for Transport (DfT), started in 1996 • Stagecoach has won all SW franchise competitions in 1996, 2001 and 2007 • Current SW franchise contract started in 2007, ends in June 2017 • Stagecoach operates under South West Trains (SWT) and Island Line (IL) brand.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleet Management Good Practice Guide: Issue 14 - January 2019 Page 1 of 12 12 Managing the Impact of Fleet Incidents on the Railway
    Fleet Management Good Practice Guide: Issue 14 - January 2019 Page 1 of 12 12 Managing the Impact of Fleet Incidents on the Railway 12.1 Introduction The purpose of this section is to give guidance on how fleet incidents can be better managed. It has been developed jointly by fleet and operations through a series of workshops and meetings to document how a joint approach to fleet incident management can reduce incident times and improve performance. It should be noted that the best practice featured in this section is irrelevant to control type and is designed to be compatible with all TOCs following the “Plan, Do, Review” process. 12.2 Definitions Primary delay: A Primary delay results from an incident that directly delays the train concerned, irrespective of whether it is to schedule (schedule includes booked platform or line) at the time the incident occurred, i.e. the delay is not the result of another delay to the same or another train. Secondary delay: Secondary or Reactionary delay results from an incident that indirectly delays the train concerned, i.e. the delay is the result of a prior delay to the same or another train. 12.3 Plan Good practice in planning for the management of technical incidents is having competent, well-trained individuals who can come together as an incident team supported by the elements of good practice described below. 12.3.1 Roles and responsibilities It is important that all staff are clear on their position in the incident management team, what their and others’ roles and responsibilities are.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Britain's Railway for Passengers and Freight
    Promoting Britain’s Railway for Passengers and Freight Please Reply to: Chris Fribbins 42 Quickrells Avenue Cliffe Rochester ME3 7RB Tel: 01634 566 256 E-Mail: [email protected] GTR December 2015 timetable consultation Railfuture is a national voluntary organisation structured in England as twelve regional branches, and two national branches in Wales and Scotland. We are completely independent of all political parties, trades unions and commercial interests, funded entirely from our membership. We campaign for improved rail services for passengers and freight. Whilst pro-rail, we are not anti car or aviation. We welcome the opportunity to take part in this review and would be keen to engage further as necessary. This response was gathered from affected branches and coordinated by Keith Dyall in his role as Railfuture TOC Liaison for the GTR Franchise (email [email protected], 26 Millway, Mill Hill, London, NW7 3RB). December 2015 - Thameslink Bedford to Gatwick Airport and Brighton Q1 What do you think about these proposals noting that it is not possible to serve both London Bridge and London Blackfriars stations from Preston Park, Hassocks and Wivelsfield until 2018 when the Thameslink works are completed? A This specific change may be undesirable but appears inevitable. See also our response to Q11. Q2 Do you support the new journey opportunities between Brighton, Gatwick Airport, Central London, Stevenage, Letchworth and Cambridge? A Yes. A major improvement in connectivity by bringing the Brighton and Great Northern routes together in the expanded Thameslink network. Q3 Do you support faster journey times for passengers for overnight journeys travelling from stations between Bedford, Luton and London A Yes, but it seems that improvements are to be made for outer passengers at the expense of shorter distance travel, and Luton now appears to do better than Gatwick for passengers and staff.
    [Show full text]
  • The South West Spine
    The South West Spine A report by: Cornwall Council Devon County Council Plymouth City Council Somerset County Council Torbay Council - on the urgent need for increased investment to improve network resilience and to meet unprecedented rising numbers of passengers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Councillor James Currie Leader of Cornwall Council Councillor John Hart Leader, Devon County Council Councillor Tudor Evans Leader, Plymouth City Council Councillor David Hall Cabinet Member for Economic Development, Infrastructure & Innovation, Somerset County Council Gordon Oliver Mayor, Torbay Council -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Contents Summary Report Page 3 Recommendations Page 6 Full Report Page 7 1. The Far South West Economy Page 7 2. Lack of Network Resilience Page 12 3. Current Industry Investment Plans Page 14 4. Gap Analysis: What Needs to be Done Page 19 5. Conclusions Page 22 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Summary Report Economic Context The Far South West (the SW peninsula from Somerset westwards) has a population of almost 2.2 million people, twice as large as Tyne & Wear, one third larger than Glasgow City Region and similar in size to West Yorkshire (2011 data). The peninsula has: • a large but underperforming economy with low economic productivity; GVA per head in the Far SW is significantly below the national average: GVA per head in Cornwall is 66.3%; in Torbay it is 60.5%;
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Privatisation – How Is It Going?
    This is a repository copy of Rail Privatisation – How Is It Going?. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2104/ Monograph: Nash, C. (1997) Rail Privatisation – How Is It Going? Working Paper. Institute of Transport Studies , Leeds, UK. Working Paper 497 Reuse See Attached Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ White Rose Research Online http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Institute of Transport Studies University of Leeds This is an ITS Working Paper produced and published by the University of Leeds. ITS Working Papers are intended to provide information and encourage discussion on a topic in advance of formal publication. They represent only the views of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views or approval of the sponsors. White Rose Repository URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2104 Published paper Chris Nash (1997) Rail Privatisation – How Is It Going? Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Working Paper 497 White Rose Consortium ePrints Repository [email protected] March 1997 This work was sponsored by The Economic and Social Research Council. ITS Working Papers are intended to provide information and encourage discussion on a topic in advance of formal publication. They represent only the views of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views or approval of the sponsors.
    [Show full text]