DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecoplex Draft Initial Study MND for Website

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecoplex Draft Initial Study MND for Website CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice is hereby given that the City of Cathedral City, as Lead Agency, has completed an Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit No. 17-005 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 37273 for a medical cannabis cultivation facility. The proposed project consists of the subdivision of one property into two lots and the construction of two buildings. A single story, 14,606 square-foot building will be constructed on Parcel 1, which will be approximately 1.12 acres in size. A two-story, 28,838 square-foot building will be constructed on Parcel 2, which will 1.69 acres in size. The project site is located at the terminus of Margot Murphy Way, a private street situated between Perez Road and Canyon Plaza (APN 687-510-048). This Initial Study was completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This Initial Study was undertaken for the purpose of deciding whether the project may have a significant effect on the environment. On the basis of such Initial Study, City Staff has determined that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, but with the implementation of mitigation measures, impacts will be reduced to less than significant levels, and has, therefore, prepared a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Initial Study reflects the independent judgment of the City. The site is not known to be on the Hazardous Waste list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Copies of the application materials, Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration are on file and available for public review with the Planning Department, City Hall, 68700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero, Cathedral City, CA 92234. City Hall is open Monday-Thursday (7am-6pm). A copy of the Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration is also available at the Cathedral City Library located at 33520 Date Palm Drive, Cathedral City 92234. A digital copy of the IS/MND is available for public review on the City’s website (www.cathedralcity.gov). The public review period for this Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration will be from July 3, 2017 to July 24, 2017. Any person wishing to comment on this matter must submit such comments in writing during the review period. Comments of all Responsible Agencies are also requested. Please submit responses to: Robert Rodriguez / Planning Manager City of Cathedral City 68700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero Cathedral City, CA 92234 email: [email protected] phone: 760-770-0344 The Planning Commission will consider the project and the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration at a public hearing. This matter has been tentatively scheduled for the August 2, 2017 Planning Commission meeting. If the Planning Commission finds that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment, it will adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Ecoplex Park Conditional Use Permit 17-005 and TPM 37273 APNs 687-510-048 Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Applicant: ALEX GONZALES MOUNTAIN EDGE COLLECTIVE, INC 30875 DATE PALM DRIVE CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 Lead Agency: City of Cathedral City 68-700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero Cathedral City, CA 92234 Prepared by: Sandra Campbell, Associate Planner Robert Rodriguez, Planning Manager City of Cathedral City 68-700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero Cathedral City, CA 92234 760-770-0344 June 27, 2017 T ABLE OF C ONTENTS _____________________________________________________________________________ Page number(s) Chapter 1 – Introduction 1.1 Purpose and Scope ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Project Description ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Discretionary Actions ................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Project Location and Environmental Setting ................................................................................ 3 1.5 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation ........................................................................................ 2-3 1.6 Determination .............................................................................................................................. 3 Chapter 2 – Environmental Checklist .................................................................................................. 15-105 I. Aesthetics ................................................................................................................................. 19 II. Agriculture and Forest Resources ........................................................................................... 23 III. Air Quality ............................................................................................................................... 25 IV. Biological Resources ............................................................................................................... 41 V. Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................. 53 VI. Geology and Soils .................................................................................................................... 57 VII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ..................................................................................................... 63 VIII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials .......................................................................................... 67 IX. Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................................................. 72 X. Land Use and Planning ............................................................................................................ 78 XI. Mineral Resources .................................................................................................................. 81 XII. Noise ....................................................................................................................................... 82 XIII. Population and Housing .......................................................................................................... 87 XIV. Public Services ......................................................................................................................... 88 XV. Recreation ............................................................................................................................... 89 XVI. Transportation and Traffic ...................................................................................................... 90 XVII. Tribal Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................ 98 XVIII. Utilities and Service Systems ................................................................................................ 101 XIX. Mandatory Findings of Significance ...................................................................................... 105 Chapter 3 – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) ............................................ 107-111 References ................................................................................................................................................ 112 FIGURES 1-1: Regional Location Map .................................................................................................................. 4 1-2: 2015 Aerial of Project Site and Immediate Surrounding Area ...................................................... 5 1-3: Photographs of Site and Surrounding Area .............................................................................. 6-10 1-4: Tentative Parcel Map No. 37273 .................................................................................................. 11 1-5: Project Site Plan ............................................................................................................................ 12 1-6: Building A Elevations .................................................................................................................... 13 1-7: Building B Elevations ..................................................................................................................... 14 2-1: View of project site from East Palm Canyon Drive ....................................................................... 20 2-2: View across site from Margot Murphy Way ................................................................................. 20 2-3: Photo simulation of project appearance from East Palm Canyon Drive and Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Ecoplex Park (CUP 17- 005 and TPM 37273) Page | i Margot Murphy Way ........................................................................................................................... 21 BIO-1: Aerial of Site and Surrounding Area ......................................................................................... 43 BIO-2: Aerial Photo of Site and Proximity to the Eagle Canyon Dam .................................................. 44 GEO-1 Map of Regional Faults ............................................................................................................. 60 LU-1: Zoning Map of Project Site and Surrounding Area ..................................................................... 79 T-1: Project Location
Load more

Recommended publications
  • D.7 Cultural and Paleontological Resources
    Devers–Palo Verde No. 2 Transmission Line Project D.7 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES D.7 Cultural and Paleontological Resources D.7.1 Regional Setting and Approach to Data Collection This section discusses the cultural and paleontological resources located in the general area of the Pro- posed Project. Background information for the project area is provided (Section D.7.2 and D.7.3) along with a list of applicable regulations (Section D.7.4). Potential impacts and mitigation measures for the Proposed Project are outlined by segment in Sections D.7.6 and D.7.7. Project alternatives are addressed in Sections D.7.8 and D.7.9. A cultural resource is defined as any object or specific location of past human activity, occupation, or use, identifiable through historical documentation, inventory, or oral evidence. Cultural resources can be separated into three categories: archaeological, building and structural, and traditional resources (DSW EIR, 2005). Archaeological resources include both historic and prehistoric remains of human activity. Historic re- sources can consist of structures (cement foundations), historic objects (bottles and cans), and sites (trash deposits or scatters). Prehistoric resources can include lithic scatters, ceramic scatters, quarries, habitation sites, temporary camps/rock rings, ceremonial sites, and trails. Building and structural sites can vary from historic buildings to canals, historic roads and trails, bridges, ditches, and cemeteries. A traditional cultural resource or traditional cultural property (TCP) can include Native American sacred sites (rock art sites) and traditional resources or ethnic communities important for maintaining the cul- tural traditions of any group. Paleontology is the study of life in past geologic time based on fossil plants and animals and including phylogeny, their relationships to existing plants, animals, and environments, and the chronology of the Earth's history.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Report
    PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Whitewater Preserve Levee Protection Project Unincorporated Riverside County, California September 11, 2020 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Whitewater Preserve Levee Protection Project Unincorporated Riverside County, California Prepared for: Travis J. McGill Director/Biologist ELMT Consulting 2201 North Grand Avenue #10098 Santa Ana, California 92711 Prepared by: Principal Investigator David Brunzell, M.A., RPA Contributions by Nicholas Shepetuk, B.A., and Dylan Williams, B.A. BCR Consulting LLC Claremont, California 91711 BCR Consulting LLC Project No. EMT2002 Site Recorded: Whitewater Levee Keywords: Levee USGS Quadrangles: 7.5-minute White Water, California (1988) Section 22 of Township 2 South, Range 3 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian September 11, 2020 SEPTEMBER 11, 2020 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMEN T WHITEWATER PRESERVE LEVEE PROTECTION PROJECT RIVERSIDE COUNTY MANAGEMENT SUMMARY BCR Consulting LLC (BCR Consulting) is under contract to ELMT Consulting to conduct a Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment of the Whitewater Preserve Levee Protection Project (the project), consisting of 7.8 acres in unincorporated Riverside County, California. This work was completed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based on Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy requirements. During the current assessment, BCR Consulting completed a cultural resources records search summary, additional land use history research, and intensive field survey for the project site. The Eastern Information Center (EIC; the repository that houses cultural resources records for the project area) is closed to consultants in March 2020 due to Covid- 19 restrictions. Although the EIC has reportedly begun processing records search requests internally, we have not received results or estimated schedule for any requests since March.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter IV. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
    Chapter IV. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES City of Banning General Plan WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT PURPOSE The Water Resources Element addresses water quality, availability and conservation for the City’s current and future needs. The Element also discusses the importance of on-going coordination and cooperation between the City, Banning Heights Mutual Water Company, High Valley Water District, San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency and other agencies responsible for supplying water to the region. Topics include the ground water replenishment program, consumptive demand of City residents, and wastewater management and its increasingly important role in the protection of ground water resources. The goals, policies and programs set forth in this element direct staff and other City officials in the management of this essential resource. BACKGROUND The Water Resources Element is directly related to the Land Use Element, in considering the availability of water resources to meet the land use plan; and has a direct relationship to the Flooding and Hydrology Element, in its effort to protect and enhance groundwater recharge. Water issues are also integral components of the following elements: Police and Fire Protection, Economic Development, Emergency Preparedness, and Water, Wastewater and Utilities. The Water Resources Element addresses topics set forth in California Government Code Section 65302(d). Also, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 21083.2(g), the City is empowered to require that adequate research and documentation be conducted when the potential for significant impacts to water and other important resources exists. Watersheds The westernmost part of the planning area is located at the summit of the San Gorgonio Pass, which divides two major watersheds: the San Jacinto River Watershed to the west and the Salton Sea watershed to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Cathedral City Comprehensive General Plan
    CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN Prepared for City of Cathedral City 68-700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero Cathedral City, CA 92234 Prepared by Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc. 400 South Farrell, Suite B-205 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Adopted July 31, 2002 Amended November 18, 2009 City of Cathedral City General Plan/Table of Contents CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY GENERAL PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION I Introduction – amended 6/24/2009 I-1 II. ADMINISTRATION ELEMENT – amended 6/24/2009 II-1 III. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Land Use Element – amended 6/24/2009 III-1 B. Circulation Element – amended 6/24/2009 III-27 C. Housing Element – adopted 11/18/2009 III-61 D. Parks and Recreation Element – amended 6/24/2009 III-121 E. Community Image and Urban Design Element – amended 6/24/2009 III-137 F. Economic and Fiscal Element – amended 6/24/2009 III-153 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES A. Biological Resources Element – amended 6/24/2009 IV-1 B. Archaeological and Historic Resources Element IV-23 C. Water Resources Element IV-38 D. Air Quality Element IV-51 E. Open Space and Conservation Element – amended 6/24/2009 IV-61 F. Energy and Mineral Resources Element – amended 6/24/2009 IV-74 V. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS A. Geotechnical Element V-1 B. Flooding and Hydrology Element V-24 C. Noise Element – amended 6/24/2009 V-37 D. Hazardous and Toxic Materials Element V-53 VI. PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES A. Water, Sewer and Utilities Element – amended 6/24/2009 VI-1 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Salton Sea Shallow Water Habitat Pilot Project
    TETRA TECH, INC. 180 Howard Street, Suite 250 San Francisco, CA 94105-1617 Telephone (415) 974-1221 (510) 286-0152 FAX (415) 974-5914 August 19, 2005 Subject: Draft Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact for the Shallow Water Habitat Pilot Project Dear Reviewer: The Bureau of Reclamation is the Lead Agency for the adoption of a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Finding of No Significant Impact for this project and is requesting comments. Please find enclosed one bound copy of the Draft Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact. The review period is from August 22, 2005 to September 20, 2005. Please submit your written comments to: Bureau of Reclamation Lower Colorado Regional Office P.O. Box 61470 Boulder City, NV 89006-1470 Attn: Cheryl Rodriguez (LC-1340) Tel. 702.293.8167 Fax. 702.293-8023 Or if by e-mail to: [email protected] If you have any questions, please contact me at (415) 974-1221. Respectfully, Andrew Gentile Project Manager Enclosure e-mail: [email protected] world wide web: http://www.ttsfo.com This page intentionally left blank. Salton Sea Shallow Water Habitat Pilot Project Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation August 2005 This page intentionally left blank. Salton Sea Shallow Water Habitat Pilot Project Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact 04PE303285 by Tetra Tech, Inc. 180 Howard Street, Suite 250 San Francisco, California 94105-1617 Prepared for: U.S. Department
    [Show full text]
  • BLM Worksheets
    8 77 " 52 41 12 " " 7 " " 4 Providence and Buillion Mountains 49 Pinto Lucerne Valley and Eastern Slopes ! ! ! 63 88 8 20 Coachella Valley 19 21 Colorado Desert 27 ! Lake Cahuilla 72 ! 0 5 10 I Miles 57 ! Existing " Proposed DRECPSubareas 84 Coachella Va3lle4y Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) ACECs within the Coachella Subarea # Proposed ACECs None # Existing ACECs (within DRECP boundary) 27 Dos Palmas 88 Whitewater Canyon Dos Palmas Preserve Description/Location: Dos Palmas is a nature preserve established through a partnership between The Nature Conservancy and the Bureau of Land management for the protection of wetlands, wildlife, desert plant communities and cultural resources. Dos Palmas is located northeast of the Salton Sea in Riverside County, California. It is off Highway 111, approximately 10 miles southeast of Mecca. Nationally Significant Values: Ecological Values: This unit features a variety of unique ecosystems in the Colorado Desert including sand dunes, salt flats, springs, seeps, artesian springs, and palm oases that provide sanctuary to several wildlife species. The most common ecosystems within the Preserve are the unique desert fan palm oases, with intriguing hydrological conditions. Federally endangered desert pupfish depend on these palm oases for shelter from predators and harsh temperatures. San Andreas Fault lines formed these oases by allowing water to flow from underground to the surface, creating substantial amounts of wetland habitat within the Preserve. The surrounding wetland habitat shelters the nests of threatened and endangered California Black Rail and Yuma Clapper Rail, as well as providing safe passage for several migratory bird species. These hydrological conditions also provide a diversity hot‐spot in the middle of the desert for dragonflies and damselflies.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2015.Pdf
    Winter 2015 History of the Coachella Valley & Palm Desert Railroad and Imperial Irrigation District restored the river Speech given by Hal Rover, President to its banks by 1907. at the Mayor’s Breakfast 6/10/2003 While our nation was still forming in the late 1700's, there began to be stirrings and some human If you allow yourself to dream a bit, you may see movement threading its way in and out of valleys the early Cenozoic development of the Pacific plate and mountains. The Cahuilla Indians were active all as the earth's surface cooled and buckled, mountains over this area on its alluvial fans and rocky terrain. elevated and valleys formed. The Coachella Valley is They lived in scattered rancherias, each with its open just a continuation of the Gulf of California. space and water supply somewhere nearby. The Portrero band of Beaumont, Aqua Caliente of Palm The Salton Sink, as it is known, reaches from the Springs, Rincon, Toro, Martinez, La Mosa and Cabazon Whitewater Pass to the Gulf and includes sand dunes, all were living off the low desert lands. faults, gorges, bedrock, volcanic knobs, hot There was a "red flag up" about this desert. Even springs, hot brine wells Juan Baptista de Anza made his way paralleling the The Mission of and snail and clam shell Mexican border in 1774, avoiding unknown spaces the Historical deposits. It is the largest out to the north. He moved west through the Society of Palm dry land area below sea Imperial Valley and climbed out through Borrego Springs and Oak Grove on his way to colonize San Desert level in the western United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Lost Treasures in the Desert?
    Tales of the Desert Page 1 of 11 Lost Treasures in the Desert? In the distance is Danby Lake (Dry), North of Desert Center, CA . It appears bright white because of the solid evaporites left behind. Introduction Welcome to the Desert! In the American Southwest lies a vast region of moderate-to-extreme desolation encompassed by the Sonoran Desert, the Mojave Desert, and the Basin and Range Province . Die-hard folks (mostly from the East coast and the South, but some from abroad) over the past five http ://www.geog.ucsb.edu/-dylan/history .htm 11/29/00 Tales of the Desert Page 2 of 11 centuries have explored, exploited, prospered and profited from the land of the West. However, some have been lured by the sheer thought of gold prospecting towards an easy life . In most cases, though, amateur treasure hunters failed to make ends meet. Those who did find anything of value were not guaranteed the pleasure of living off their finds. A good number of prospectors -- after encountering good luck in making a strike, ventured out again to find their horde and extract greater amounts with more provisions - - and were never seen or heard from again, their secret of desert treasure lost forever. B ut sometimes not. All too many lost gold mine stories stem from a similar kind of event: a staggering, dusty, sunburned, near-dead prospector arriving in an outpost town with a sackful of ore, confiding his information on his deathbed to an equally gold-struck person. Not surprisingly, the confidant almost always never finds the site.
    [Show full text]
  • AHS-Rio Colorado Ephemera Collection, Arizona Historical Society- Rio Colorado Division, Yuma
    TITLE: AHS–Rio Colorado Ephemera Collection DATE RANGE: 1870’s - current PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 89 Linear Feet (176 boxes) PROVENANCE: In 2013 all ephemeral and vertical file materials from multiple donors and locations were evaluated and consolidated to form a unified ephemera collection that could grow into the future. Recognition should be given to the thousands of donors and thousands of volunteer hours who collected and organized these materials since 1965. RESTRICTIONS: None CREDIT LINE: AHS-Rio Colorado Ephemera Collection, Arizona Historical Society- Rio Colorado Division, Yuma PROCESSSED BY: John Irwin, 2013-2014 SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE: This is the largest archival collection in the AHS-Rio Colorado holdings. It represents a wide range of social, economic, cultural and ethnic communities reflecting the spectrum of human activity, past and present. The Yuma County Historical Society began collecting archival materials in 1965. This effort continued after it became a branch of the Arizona Historical Society in 1971, and later the AHS-Rio Colorado Division. Over the decades various methods were employed by staff and volunteers to organize segments of the materials. The bulk of this collection is based on the organizational structure adopted in the 1980s. Subheadings have been added to make this large body of material more accessible to researchers. Between 1993 and 2012 volunteers also assembled and organized twelve linear feet of newspaper articles primarily from the Yuma Daily Sun. These contemporary articles have been added within the appropriate headings. It is arranged alphabetically both by geographic place names and subject headings that range from broad to more specific. Its scope covers the breadth of human activities and knowledge of the Lower Colorado River area of Arizona, especially Yuma and La Paz Counties, from the Spanish period to the present.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Context and Methodology for Evaluating Trails, Roads, and Highways in California
    A Historical Context and Methodology for Evaluating Trails, Roads, and Highways in California Prepared by The California Department of Transportation Sacramento, California ® ® © 2016 California Department of Transportation. All Rights Reserved. Cover photography provided Caltrans Headquarters Library. Healdsburg Wheelmen photograph courtesy of the Healdsburg Museum. For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats upon request. Please call: (916) 653-0647 Voice, or use the CA Relay Service TTY number 1-800-735-2929 Or write: Chief, Cultural Studies Office Caltrans, Division of Environmental Analysis P.O. Box 942874, MS 27 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001 A HISTORICAL CONTEXT AND METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING TRAILS, ROADS, AND HIGHWAYS IN CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Cultural Studies Office Division of Environmental Analysis California Department of Transportation Sacramento 2016 © 2016 California Department of Transportation. All Rights Reserved. OTHER THEMATIC STUDIES BY CALTRANS Water Conveyance Systems in California, Historic Context Development and Evaluation Procedures (2000) A Historical Context and Archaeological Research Design for Agricultural Properties in California (2007) A Historical Context and Archaeological Research Design for Mining Properties in California (2008) A Historical Context and Archeological Research Design for Townsite Properties in California (2010) Tract Housing In California, 1945–1973: A Context for National Register Evaluation (2013) A Historical Context and Archaeological Research Design for Work Camp Properties in California (2013) MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) prepared this study in response to the need for a cohesive and comprehensive examination of trails, roads, and highways in California, and with a methodological approach for evaluating these types of properties for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).
    [Show full text]
  • Areas to Explore in the Desert
    Areas to Explore in the Desert Clapp Spring Tube Agate Page 2 Ballarat Ghost Town - Death Valley Page 8 Bodie State Historic Park Page 14 N. Black Hill Geode Beds Page 21 Black Agate Thunderegg Mine Page 26 Black Agate Hills Page 32 Calico Ghost Town Page 38 Cinnamon Geode Beds Page 41 Coon Hollow Camping Page 55 Fossil Canyon & Painted Gorge - BLM Page 53 Ghost Town Montgomery City Page 57 Gold Fever in the Desert Anza-Borrego Page 61 Hauser Geode Beds - BLM Page 78 Kyanite Ore Cargo Muchacho Mountains Page 69 McCoy Mountains Limonite Cubes Page 81 Meteorite Treasures Page 86 Lost Breyfogle Mine Page 91 1 Collecting Tube Agate at Clapp Spring Palo Verde Mountains, CA by Delmer G. Ross Clapp Spring is a permanent source of water set in a small oasis of fan palms and mesquite located in some low hills on the northeast flank of the Palo Verde Mountains. It lies approximately nine miles from the community of Palo Verde, California, and perhaps 10 miles west of the Colorado River, the eastern edge of the Colorado Desert. Overlooked on the south by some caves once used by Indians and set at the center of a web of converging animal trails, it is a captivating place. Reflecting the amount of rainfall during the preceding several years, the main pool at the spring varies from a few inches to five feet in diameter and from three to nine inches deep. It is located in the heart of the oasis, at the base of a palm. Except during and a few years after a serious drought, there may be several additional seeps and smaller pools of water in shallow holes dug by wild burros.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Eastern Coachella Valley Area Plan Revised: May 5, 2021 This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS VISION SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................4 A Special Note on Implementing the Vision ................................................................................................5 LOCATION...........................................................................................................................................................6 FEATURES ..........................................................................................................................................................6 SETTING ............................................................................................................................................................6 UNIQUE FEATURES .............................................................................................................................................6 Salton Trough and Salton Sea ....................................................................................................................6 Whitewater River Stormwater Evacuation Channel ....................................................................................7 The Colorado River Aqueduct .....................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]