Geology of the Imperial Valley California

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geology of the Imperial Valley California The Imperial Valley is located about 150 miles southeast of Los Angeles. It is a section of a much larger geologic structure -- the Salton Trough -- which is about 1,000 miles in length. The structure extends from San Gorgonio Pass southeast to the Mexican border, including the Gulf of California and beyond the tip of the Baja California Peninsula. The surrounding mountains are largely faulted blocks of the Southern California batholith of Mesozoic age, overlain by fragments of an earlier metamorphic complex. The valley basin consists of a sedimentary fill of sands and gravels ranging up to 15,000 feet in thickness. The layers slope gently down-valley, and contain several important aquifers. The valley is laced with major members of the San Andreas Fault system. Minor to moderate earthquake events are common, but severe shocks have not been experienced in recorded history. The entire trough, including the Gulf is an extension of the East Pacific Rise, a zone of separation in Earth's crust. Deep sea submergence instruments have observed many phenomena of crustal formation. The axis of the Rise, hence of the Salton Valley as well, is a great transform fault that is having the effect of separating an enormous slab of North America, consisting of the Baja Peninsula and coastal California away from the mainland, with movement to the northwest and out to sea as a terranne. Table of Contents Chapter 1 The San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains Chapter 2 The Eastern Mountains Chapter 3 San Gorgonio Pass Chapter 4 The Hills Chapter 5 Desert Sand Chapter 6 The Palm Oases Chapter 7 Ancient Lake Cahuilla Chapter 8 The Salton Sea Chapter 9 The Gulf of California Chapter 10 Volcanic Activity Chapter 11 Water: A Desert Imperative Chapter 12 Water Supplies for the Thirsty Desert Chapter 13 The Colorado River Chapter 14 The Coachella Aquifer Chapter 15 Water Rights Chapter 16 The Dynamics of an Earthquake Chapter 17 The Richter Scale Chapter 18 The San Andreas Fault System Chapter 19 A Role Call of Earthquakes Chapter 20 Summary CHAPTER 1 THE SAN JACINTO AND THE SANTA ROSA MOUNTAINS FROM THE SIERRA NEVADA MOUNTAINS of Central California to the southern tip of Baja California, a single massive block of granitic rocks extends over a distance of 1,500 miles. This block represents two huge magma bodies that were intruded simultaneously during Mesozoic time, about 100 million years ago. Known as the Southern California batholith and the Sierra Nevada batholith,[1] these granitic rocks consitute the core of many mountain ranges in western North America. The combined bodies underlie an area exceeding 40,000 square miles, with the southern California batholith being the larger of the two masses. Even so, these two batholiths are members of a greater batholithic system that comprise the core rocks of mountain ranges that extend more than 4,000 miles along the coastal margins of North and South America from Alaska to Chile. Radiometric dating has assigned an estimated date of origin at 90 to 105 million years ago, or middle to late Cretaceous time. This places the intrusion as associated with a major mountain-building episode when North and South America were pushed westward on their plates. The Genesis of the Mountains Formation of a mass of molten rock as large as these batholiths is not a random event. It is a process associated with subduction zones and plate movement. The two Mesozoic batholiths of California are a case in point. In Late Jurassic time, about 150 million years ago, as part of a vast crustal disturbance, the westward-moving American plates began to override the Pacific plate, forcing the oceanic plate downward into the crust as a subduction zone. Under increasing depth and pressure, the descending crustal materials were converted into a molten magma. Before the end of the Jurassic, about 100 million years ago, the magma began to move slowly upward into the crust just beneath the surface. In so doing, it absorbed and converted the sedimentary rock overburden by heat and pressure into a complex new series of metamorphic rocks. The mahogany-colored rocks visible today on the lower mountain slopes from Palm Springs to Palm Desert are metamorphic rock remnants of that time and process. During mid-Cenozoic time, some 50 million years ago, under continued pressure of the westward moving plates, the leading edge began to crumple, initiating a mountain- building episode. The crust was under enormous stress, and the rocks ruptured along vertical faults. Mountain blocks began to rise in a series of steps, with long periods of erosion between episodes of uplift. This period of mountain building reached its climax within the past few million years. Today, like the tips of an iceberg, the mountain ranges of southern California and Baja California are the exposed protrusions of this one mass. The largest of these are the Peninsular Ranges, which extend from the Santa Ana Mountains, near Riverside, to the tip of Baja California, a distance of nearly 1,000 miles. The west coast of mainland Mexico from the Gulf of Tehuantepec to the Los Angeles basin also includes numerous extensive mountain ranges of the same rock types. Erosion kept pace with uplift, and most of the overlying metamorphic layer was stripped away. Remnants of these very old rocks remain today in exposures in the upper elevations of the Santa Rosa Mountains and along the base of the San Jacinto Mountains. The Southern California Batholith The batholith is a massive intrusion of several types of granitic rock, successively injected into the crust as a series of plutons.[2] The plutons represent multiple injections over a period that may have been as long as 10 million years. The batholithic mass contains many high-silica related rock types, but more than 90 percent of the mass consists of five igneous rocks: diorite, quartz diorite, granodiorite, quartz monzonite and granite . All occur as large bodies, derived from the separate plutons. Of these, light-colored diorite and granodiorite are most important to the Salton Valley, comprising the core rocks of both the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains. In contrast, the granitic rocks in the desert mountains to the east, e.g. the Little San Bernardino Mountains are chiefly granodiorite and quartz monzonite which are higher in feldspar and alumina and lower in silica than the rocks of the main body as represented by the San Jacinto Mountaisn. Notwithstanding these local variations, the batholith as a whole is remarkably homogeneous, consisting almost entirely of the lighter igneous rock types. The darker ultra-mafic rock series are rare, and alkaline types such as syenite are almost non-existent. The Peninsular Ranges of California The geomorphic unit, nearly 1000 miles in length, is known collectively as the Peninsular Ranges. The San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains are ranges within this major mountain system. The individual ranges of the Peninsular Ranges are gigantic fault blocks, most of which are tilted to the west, toward the sea. The bedrock core in all ranges of the system is the Mesozoic granitic rock complex of the southern California batholith. The blocks are discrete mountain ranges, separated by valleys, all defined by faults which lie generally parallel to the boundary system, and all are oriented northwest-southeast. Each of the blocks has had its own distinctive landscape evolution depending on the nature and magnitude of the fault movements that created it. In their uplift, the mountain blocks tilted west. With few exceptions, the highest elevations in the individual ranges are located close to the eastern scarp, while the western side slopes gradually. Hence, the common geomorphic feature of most of the ranges is a western subdued upland surface with gentle relief, and a steep eroded eastern scarp descending abruptly to the valley floor. This describes the mountains which form the western margin of the Salton Valley the Santa Rosa Mountains and the San Jacinto Mountains. The mechanism for this is not completely understood. The most current perception is that the entire region is underlain by a massive detachment fault.[3] Under persistent stress, the separated mass breaks into blocks which then rotate along normal faults to accommodate the tensional strain. The tilt of the mountain blocks is dramatically evident to travelers crossing the mountains by the east-west highways. The approaches to the mountains from the east entails slower travel over steep mountain grades. On the other hand, travelers entering the mountains from the west drive up gradual slopes that are hardly noticeable. There are several nearby examples of this, such as the spectacular climb by Highway 74, from Palm Desert. The highway climbs Seven Level Grade up the face of the Santa Rosa Mountains, then descends over a gradual slope to Anza Valley. Another example is Highway 243 from Banning to Idyllwild. As a topographic unit the western margin of the Peninsular Ranges is inland several miles from the sea. The main structure continues beneath a sloping seacoast plain and under the sea as a broad submerged continental borderland whose geology closely resembles the landward portion. The islands of Catalina, San Nicholas and Santa Barbara are the exposed tops of elevated blocks of this same structure. The blocks are separated by deep troughs aligned northwest-southeast. There are many submerged near-vertical fault scarps that define the margins of these blocks. As a result, the submarine topography off the coast of Southern California consists of elevated blocks exposed as islands separated by downthrown blocks of deep-water canyons. The submarine geology of the Gulf of California appears to be very similar, and even on a grander scale with extremely deep basins within the narrow Gulf.
Recommended publications
  • Coachella Valley Inland Empire - CA
    Office Submarket Report Coachella Valley Inland Empire - CA PREPARED BY Kimberly Wright Economic Development Manager Coachella Valley Office OFFICE SUBMARKET REPORT Submarket Key Statistics 1 Leasing 2 Rent 5 Construction 7 Sales 10 Sales Past 12 Months 12 Supply & Demand Trends 14 Rent & Vacancy 16 Sale Trends 18 5/20/2021 Copyrighted report licensed to Riverside County EDA - 1126743 Overview Coachella Valley Office 12 Mo Deliveries in SF 12 Mo Net Absorption in SF Vacancy Rate 12 Mo Rent Growth 0 (51.6K) 10.1% 1.4% Coachella Valley is a desert area located west of Joshua However, the Desert Sun moved their printing press to Tree National Park and is home to the popular resort Phoenix and vacated their 96,600-SF office cities of Palm Springs and Palm Desert. Businesses building—sharply driving vacancies higher. The vacancy serving local consumers make up the majority of office rate now stands at 10.1%. Rent growth has slowed to users here, such as health care providers and 1.4% over the past 12 months, compared to 1.5% across government agencies. Tech businesses and coworking, the Inland Empire. There are a few offices under which have been driving much of the demand in coastal construction, including a 35,000-SF build-to-suit in markets, are almost nonexistent. Palm Springs for the Riverside University Health System. Demand for offices has shifted toward dense population Sales volume has averaged $46.4 million over the past centers during this cycle and the local office market has ten years including $53.1 million in 2020 and $33.7 fallen victim to this trend.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.3 Geology Jan 09 02 ER Rev4
    3.3 Geology and Soils 3.3.1 Introduction and Summary Table 3.3-1 summarizes the geology and soils impacts for the Proposed Project and alternatives. TABLE 3.3-1 Summary of Geology and Soils Impacts1 Alternative 2: 130 KAFY Proposed Project: On-farm Irrigation Alternative 3: 300 KAFY System 230 KAFY Alternative 4: All Conservation Alternative 1: Improvements All Conservation 300 KAFY Measures No Project Only Measures Fallowing Only LOWER COLORADO RIVER No impacts. Continuation of No impacts. No impacts. No impacts. existing conditions. IID WATER SERVICE AREA AND AAC GS-1: Soil erosion Continuation of A2-GS-1: Soil A3-GS-1: Soil A4-GS-1: Soil from construction existing conditions. erosion from erosion from erosion from of conservation construction of construction of fallowing: Less measures: Less conservation conservation than significant than significant measures: Less measures: Less impact with impact. than significant than significant mitigation. impact. impact. GS-2: Soil erosion Continuation of No impact. A3-GS-2: Soil No impact. from operation of existing conditions. erosion from conservation operation of measures: Less conservation than significant measures: Less impact. than significant impact. GS-3: Reduction Continuation of A2-GS-2: A3-GS-3: No impact. of soil erosion existing conditions. Reduction of soil Reduction of soil from reduction in erosion from erosion from irrigation: reduction in reduction in Beneficial impact. irrigation: irrigation: Beneficial impact. Beneficial impact. GS-4: Ground Continuation of A2-GS-3: Ground A3-GS-4: Ground No impact. acceleration and existing conditions. acceleration and acceleration and shaking: Less than shaking: Less than shaking: Less than significant impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report
    Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report JUNE 2017 CENTRAL COAST WETLANDS GROUP MOSS LANDING MARINE LABS | 8272 MOSS LANDING RD, MOSS LANDING, CA Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report This page intentionally left blank Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report i Prepared by Central Coast Wetlands Group at Moss Landing Marine Labs Technical assistance provided by: ESA Revell Coastal The Nature Conservancy Center for Ocean Solutions Prepared for The County of Santa Cruz Funding Provided by: The California Ocean Protection Council Grant number C0300700 Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report ii Primary Authors: Central Coast Wetlands group Ross Clark Sarah Stoner-Duncan Jason Adelaars Sierra Tobin Kamille Hammerstrom Acknowledgements: California State Ocean Protection Council Abe Doherty Paige Berube Nick Sadrpour Santa Cruz County David Carlson City of Capitola Rich Grunow Coastal Conservation and Research Jim Oakden Science Team David Revell, Revell Coastal Bob Battalio, ESA James Gregory, ESA James Jackson, ESA GIS Layer support AMBAG Santa Cruz County Adapt Monterey Bay Kelly Leo, TNC Sarah Newkirk, TNC Eric Hartge, Center for Ocean Solution Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report iii Contents Contents Summary of Findings ........................................................................................................................ viii 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Visitor's Guide to El Camino Del Diablo Leg 2B: El Camino Del Diablo from Tule Well to Tinajas Altas
    Cabeza Prieta Natural History Association A Visitor's Guide to El Camino del Diablo Leg 2b: El Camino del Diablo from Tule Well to Tinajas Altas Mile 69.0. 32°13’35”N, 113°44’59”W. Key Junction, Tule Well. At the junction head west (left) to go to Tinajas Altas. Tule Well has a cabin, well, large water tank, and picnic tables. The current cabin was built in 1989 by the US Air Force’s 832nd Civil Engineering Squadron to help celebrate the refuge’s 50th anniversary, and it replaced an earlier cabin built in 1949 for refuge staff, livestock line-riders, and border agents. Traces of the old well are visible. The campground has several picnic tables. The flagpole and Boy Scout monument northwest of the cabin were built for the refuge’s dedication in March 1941 and enhanced in 1989. The original plan was to place a life- sized statue of a bighorn sheep on the monument’s base. The scouts were instrumental in a political campaign to establish the refuge. The original hand-dug well was not there at the time of the Gadsden Purchase and subsequent boundary survey of 1854, nor did Pumpelly mention a well when he passed this way in 1861. But the boundary surveyors of 1891-1896 reported, “During the ‘early sixties’ [1860s] there was a large influx in Mexicans from Sonora to the gold diggings on the Colorado River, and an enterprising Mexican dug two wells near the road, in the purpose of selling water to travelers. But the deaths from thirst along this route became so frequent that the road was soon abandoned and for over twenty years had remained unused.” By another account, perhaps apocryphal, the enterprising Mexican who dug the wells was killed by someone who refused to pay for water.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline Environmental
    Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline Environmental Assessment and Proposed California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment BLM Case File No. CACA-054096 BLM-DOI-CA-D060-2016-0017-EA BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert District 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 April 2017 USDOI Bureau of Land Management April 2017Page 2 Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline EA and Proposed CDCA Plan Amendment United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert District 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 April XX, 2017 Dear Reader: The U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has finalized the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed right-of-way (ROW) and associated California Desert Conservation Area Plan (CDCA) Plan Amendment (PA) for the Eagle Crest Energy Gen- Tie and Water Supply Pipeline (Proposed Action), located in eastern Riverside County, California. The Proposed Action is part of a larger project, the Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project (FERC Project), licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in 2014. The BLM is issuing a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) on the Proposed Action. The FERC Project would be located on approximately 1,150 acres of BLM-managed land and approximately 1,377 acres of private land. Of the 1,150 acres of BLM-managed land, 507 acres are in the 16-mile gen-tie line alignment; 154 acres are in the water supply pipeline alignment and other Proposed Action facilities outside the Central Project Area; and approximately 489 acres are lands within the Central Project Area of the hydropower project.
    [Show full text]
  • D.7 Cultural and Paleontological Resources
    Devers–Palo Verde No. 2 Transmission Line Project D.7 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES D.7 Cultural and Paleontological Resources D.7.1 Regional Setting and Approach to Data Collection This section discusses the cultural and paleontological resources located in the general area of the Pro- posed Project. Background information for the project area is provided (Section D.7.2 and D.7.3) along with a list of applicable regulations (Section D.7.4). Potential impacts and mitigation measures for the Proposed Project are outlined by segment in Sections D.7.6 and D.7.7. Project alternatives are addressed in Sections D.7.8 and D.7.9. A cultural resource is defined as any object or specific location of past human activity, occupation, or use, identifiable through historical documentation, inventory, or oral evidence. Cultural resources can be separated into three categories: archaeological, building and structural, and traditional resources (DSW EIR, 2005). Archaeological resources include both historic and prehistoric remains of human activity. Historic re- sources can consist of structures (cement foundations), historic objects (bottles and cans), and sites (trash deposits or scatters). Prehistoric resources can include lithic scatters, ceramic scatters, quarries, habitation sites, temporary camps/rock rings, ceremonial sites, and trails. Building and structural sites can vary from historic buildings to canals, historic roads and trails, bridges, ditches, and cemeteries. A traditional cultural resource or traditional cultural property (TCP) can include Native American sacred sites (rock art sites) and traditional resources or ethnic communities important for maintaining the cul- tural traditions of any group. Paleontology is the study of life in past geologic time based on fossil plants and animals and including phylogeny, their relationships to existing plants, animals, and environments, and the chronology of the Earth's history.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals of the California Desert
    MAMMALS OF THE CALIFORNIA DESERT William F. Laudenslayer, Jr. Karen Boyer Buckingham Theodore A. Rado INTRODUCTION I ,+! The desert lands of southern California (Figure 1) support a rich variety of wildlife, of which mammals comprise an important element. Of the 19 living orders of mammals known in the world i- *- loday, nine are represented in the California desert15. Ninety-seven mammal species are known to t ':i he in this area. The southwestern United States has a larger number of mammal subspecies than my other continental area of comparable size (Hall 1981). This high degree of subspeciation, which f I;, ; leads to the development of new species, seems to be due to the great variation in topography, , , elevation, temperature, soils, and isolation caused by natural barriers. The order Rodentia may be k., 2:' , considered the most successful of the mammalian taxa in the desert; it is represented by 48 species Lc - occupying a wide variety of habitats. Bats comprise the second largest contingent of species. Of the 97 mammal species, 48 are found throughout the desert; the remaining 49 occur peripherally, with many restricted to the bordering mountain ranges or the Colorado River Valley. Four of the 97 I ?$ are non-native, having been introduced into the California desert. These are the Virginia opossum, ' >% Rocky Mountain mule deer, horse, and burro. Table 1 lists the desert mammals and their range 1 ;>?-axurrence as well as their current status of endangerment as determined by the U.S. fish and $' Wildlife Service (USWS 1989, 1990) and the California Department of Fish and Game (Calif.
    [Show full text]
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • Competitive Renewable Energy Zones
    From: Megan Lawson To: Gungle, Ashley Cc: Hingtgen, Robert J; Patrick BROWN ([email protected]) ([email protected]) Subject: RE: Soitech follow up Date: Friday, October 04, 2013 2:34:46 PM Attachments: image001.png CA_CREZ_Conceptual_Transmission_Segments_Phase_2B_final.pdf Ashley, Here is our response to Mr. Silver's e-mail: Mr. Silver references “Competitive Renewable Energy Zones” (CREZs), which were part of the California Energy Commission’s (CEC) “Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative” (RETI) between 2008 and 2011. From what we can tell, the CEC’s RETI process appears to have stalled in early 2011, and now appears to have been set aside by the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) process. http://www.energy.ca.gov/reti/. As you know, we do not need to address the DRECP in the PEIR because the project areas are located entirely outside of the DRECP area. For the County’s reference, the RETI process identified necessary major updates to the California transmission system to access CREZs. The process identified CREZs that could be developed in the most cost effective and environmentally benign manner. Potential renewable energy projects were grouped into CREZs based on geographic proximity. The CREZ implicated in southern San Diego County is CREZ 27, San Diego South. Each CREZ was developed based on existing and proposed projects (e.g., those projects with a PPA, or PPA pending) and other projects or resources with a high potential of being developed. Because the Soitec projects were not yet proposed at the time of CREZ development (2008- 2010), Soitec’s projects were not accounted for in the CREZ, nor does CREZ 27 account for areas of high solar potential or the most cost-effective or environmentally-benign sites for future solar development.
    [Show full text]
  • Demography of Desert Mule Deer in Southeastern California
    CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME California Fish and Game 92(2):55-66 2006 DEMOGRAPHY OF DESERT MULE DEER IN SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA JASON P. MARSHAL School of Natural Resources University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 [email protected] LEON M. LESICKA Desert Wildlife Unlimited 4780 Highway 111 Brawley, CA 92227 VERNON C. BLEICH Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep Recovery Program California Department of Fish and Game 407 West Line Street Bishop, CA 93514 PAUL R. KRAUSMAN School of Natural Resources University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 GERALD P. MULCAHY California Department of Fish and Game P. O. Box 2160 Blythe, CA 92226 NANCY G. ANDREW California Department of Fish and Game 78-078 Country Club Drive, Suite 109 Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 Desert mule deer, Odocoileus hemionus eremicus, occur at low densities in the Sonoran Desert of southeastern California and consequently are difficult to monitor using standard wildlife techniques. We used radiocollared deer, remote photography at wildlife water developments (i.e., catchments), and mark-recapture techniques to estimate population abundance and sex and age ratios. Abundance estimates for 1999-2004 ranged from 40 to 106 deer, resulting in density estimates of 0.05-0.13 deer/km2. Ranges in herd composition were 41-74% (females), 6-31% (males), and 6-34% (young). There was a positive correlation (R = 0.73, P = 0.051) between abundance estimates and number of deer photographed/ catchment-day, and that relationship may be useful as an index of abundance in the absence of marked deer for mark-recapture methods. Because of the variable nature of desert wildlife populations, implementing 55 56 CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME strategies that recognize that variability and conserving the habitat that allow populations to fluctuate naturally will be necessary for long-term conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Climate Change Hazards
    January 11, 2017 King Tide at Its Beach source: Visit Santa Cruz County City of Santa Cruz Beaches Urban Climate Adaptation Policy Implication & Response Strategy Evaluation Technical Report June 30, 2020 This page intentionally left blank for doodling City of Santa Cruz Beaches Climate Adaptation Policy Response Strategy Technical Report ii Report Prepared for the City of Santa Cruz Report prepared by the Central Coast Wetlands Group at Moss Landing Marine Labs and Integral Consulting Authors: Ross Clark, Sarah Stoner-Duncan, David Revell, Rachel Pausch, Andre Joseph-Witzig Funding Provided by the California Coastal Commission City of Santa Cruz Beaches Climate Adaptation Policy Response Strategy Technical Report iii Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Project Goals .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Planning Context .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Project Process ......................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]