DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents Eastern Coachella Valley Area Plan Revised: May 5, 2021 This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS VISION SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................4 A Special Note on Implementing the Vision ................................................................................................5 LOCATION...........................................................................................................................................................6 FEATURES ..........................................................................................................................................................6 SETTING ............................................................................................................................................................6 UNIQUE FEATURES .............................................................................................................................................6 Salton Trough and Salton Sea ....................................................................................................................6 Whitewater River Stormwater Evacuation Channel ....................................................................................7 The Colorado River Aqueduct .....................................................................................................................7 Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument .....................................................................7 Peninsular Ranges ......................................................................................................................................7 Painted Canyon ...........................................................................................................................................7 Dos Palmas Preserve ..................................................................................................................................8 Joshua Tree National Park ..........................................................................................................................8 Agriculture ...................................................................................................................................................8 Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range ................................................................................................8 UNIQUE COMMUNITIES .......................................................................................................................................9 Thermal .......................................................................................................................................................9 Mecca ..........................................................................................................................................................9 North Shore .................................................................................................................................................9 Vista Santa Rosa .........................................................................................................................................9 Valerie Jean .................................................................................................................................................9 Oasis ...........................................................................................................................................................9 Chiriaco Summit ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Indian Lands ............................................................................................................................................. 10 INCORPORATED CITIES .................................................................................................................................... 10 City of Coachella ...................................................................................................................................... 10 LAND USE PLAN ............................................................................................................................................. 10 LAND USE CONCEPT ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Community Centers .................................................................................................................................. 12 POLICY AREAS ............................................................................................................................................... 23 POLICY AREAS ................................................................................................................................................ 23 Vista Santa Rosa Community .................................................................................................................. 23 Planned Communities .............................................................................................................................. 25 Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport and Chiriaco Summit Airport Influence Areas .............................. 28 Specific Plans ........................................................................................................................................... 28 LAND USE ........................................................................................................................................................ 29 LOCAL LAND USE POLICIES ............................................................................................................................. 29 MIXED-USE AREAS/HIGHEST DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TOWN CENTERS................................................................ 29 MECCA TOWN CENTER .................................................................................................................................... 29 NORTH SHORE TOWN CENTER (HHDR AND MIXED-USE AREA NEIGHBORHOODS) ............................................. 33 OASIS TOWN CENTER (MIXED-USE AREAS)...................................................................................................... 35 County of Riverside General Plan May 5, 2021 i THERMAL TOWN CENTER ................................................................................................................................. 36 Light Pollution ........................................................................................................................................... 39 Agricultural Lands ..................................................................................................................................... 63 Farm Worker Housing ............................................................................................................................... 63 Recreational Vehicle Developments ......................................................................................................... 63 Industrial Uses .......................................................................................................................................... 64 Watershed/Water Supply .......................................................................................................................... 65 Signage ..................................................................................................................................................... 65 Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range ............................................................................................. 68 CIRCULATION .................................................................................................................................................. 68 LOCAL CIRCULATION POLICIES ......................................................................................................................... 69 Vehicular Circulation System .................................................................................................................... 69 Rail ............................................................................................................................................................ 69 Trails and Bikeways .................................................................................................................................. 70 Scenic Highways ....................................................................................................................................... 70 MULTIPURPOSE OPEN SPACE ..................................................................................................................... 77 LOCAL OPEN SPACE POLICIES ......................................................................................................................... 77 Habitat Conservation/CVMSHCP ............................................................................................................. 77 Ridgelines ................................................................................................................................................. 77 HAZARDS ........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • D.7 Cultural and Paleontological Resources
    Devers–Palo Verde No. 2 Transmission Line Project D.7 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES D.7 Cultural and Paleontological Resources D.7.1 Regional Setting and Approach to Data Collection This section discusses the cultural and paleontological resources located in the general area of the Pro- posed Project. Background information for the project area is provided (Section D.7.2 and D.7.3) along with a list of applicable regulations (Section D.7.4). Potential impacts and mitigation measures for the Proposed Project are outlined by segment in Sections D.7.6 and D.7.7. Project alternatives are addressed in Sections D.7.8 and D.7.9. A cultural resource is defined as any object or specific location of past human activity, occupation, or use, identifiable through historical documentation, inventory, or oral evidence. Cultural resources can be separated into three categories: archaeological, building and structural, and traditional resources (DSW EIR, 2005). Archaeological resources include both historic and prehistoric remains of human activity. Historic re- sources can consist of structures (cement foundations), historic objects (bottles and cans), and sites (trash deposits or scatters). Prehistoric resources can include lithic scatters, ceramic scatters, quarries, habitation sites, temporary camps/rock rings, ceremonial sites, and trails. Building and structural sites can vary from historic buildings to canals, historic roads and trails, bridges, ditches, and cemeteries. A traditional cultural resource or traditional cultural property (TCP) can include Native American sacred sites (rock art sites) and traditional resources or ethnic communities important for maintaining the cul- tural traditions of any group. Paleontology is the study of life in past geologic time based on fossil plants and animals and including phylogeny, their relationships to existing plants, animals, and environments, and the chronology of the Earth's history.
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Riverside County Ranges Guide No
    4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY RANGES GUIDE NO. 4.6 OROCOPIA MOUNTAIN 3815 FEET CLASS 1 MILEAGE: 156 miles of paved road, 3.8 miles of good dirt, 0.4 miles of 4WD road DRIVE/ROUTE A: See Map 1. From Indio, CA. drive 23 miles E on Interstate 10 to the signed Mecca- Twentynine Palms exit. Turn right (S) and drive 0.35 miles to the paved, signed Pinto Road. Turn left (E) here and go 0.6 miles to a good dirt road heading S. Turn right (S), crossing under high voltage power lines in 0.95 miles and bearing left at the fork just past the power lines (MC 133). Continue 2.85 miles S to a junction, bearing left at all forks encountered along the way. Further progress is barred by a rock barrier across the sand wash road directly S of this junction. 2WD's park here. 4WD's can continue by taking a sharp left up a steep hill and going 75 yards to a fork. Bear right (S) at the fork and drive 0.4 miles to the Orocopia Mountains Wilderness boundary. Park. CLIMB/ROUTE A: See Map 1. From the 4WD parking area, walk 0.3 miles up the road to where it passes through a deep, narrow gully. Once across the gully, hike 0.5 miles S along the left bank of a large wash. Dropping into the wash here, follow it S for about 0.75 miles until you reach a fork with a large wash merging from the right (W) at UTM 133157.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Report
    PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Whitewater Preserve Levee Protection Project Unincorporated Riverside County, California September 11, 2020 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Whitewater Preserve Levee Protection Project Unincorporated Riverside County, California Prepared for: Travis J. McGill Director/Biologist ELMT Consulting 2201 North Grand Avenue #10098 Santa Ana, California 92711 Prepared by: Principal Investigator David Brunzell, M.A., RPA Contributions by Nicholas Shepetuk, B.A., and Dylan Williams, B.A. BCR Consulting LLC Claremont, California 91711 BCR Consulting LLC Project No. EMT2002 Site Recorded: Whitewater Levee Keywords: Levee USGS Quadrangles: 7.5-minute White Water, California (1988) Section 22 of Township 2 South, Range 3 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian September 11, 2020 SEPTEMBER 11, 2020 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMEN T WHITEWATER PRESERVE LEVEE PROTECTION PROJECT RIVERSIDE COUNTY MANAGEMENT SUMMARY BCR Consulting LLC (BCR Consulting) is under contract to ELMT Consulting to conduct a Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment of the Whitewater Preserve Levee Protection Project (the project), consisting of 7.8 acres in unincorporated Riverside County, California. This work was completed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based on Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy requirements. During the current assessment, BCR Consulting completed a cultural resources records search summary, additional land use history research, and intensive field survey for the project site. The Eastern Information Center (EIC; the repository that houses cultural resources records for the project area) is closed to consultants in March 2020 due to Covid- 19 restrictions. Although the EIC has reportedly begun processing records search requests internally, we have not received results or estimated schedule for any requests since March.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cache of Mesquite Beans from the Mecca Hills, Salton Basin
    246 JOURNAL OF CALIFORNIA AND GREAT BASIN ANTHROPOLOGY eds. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press Wheat, Margaret M. (in press). 1967 Survival Arts of the Primitive Paiutes. Reno: University of Nevada Press. 1981 The Emperor's New Clothes. American An­ tiquity 46(3): 637-640. Mirov, N. T. 1967 The Genus Pinus. New York: Ronald Press. Sargent, Charles Sprague 1937 Manual of the Trees of North America. Bos­ A Cache of Mesquite Beans ton and New York: Houghton Mifflin. from the Mecca Hills, Steward, Julian H. 1937 Linguistic Distributions and Political Groups Salton Basin, California of the Great Basin Shoshoneans. American Anthropologist 39(4): 625-635. JAMES D. SWENSON 1938 Basin-Plateau Aboriginal Sociopolitical Groups. Bureau of American Ethnology Bul­ During the winter of 1972, a ceramic oUa letin No. 120. or storage jar containing a cache of honey mesquite {Prosopis glandulosa var. torreyana) Thomas, David Hurst 1971 Prehistoric Subsistence-Settlement Patterns beans was recovered from a smaU wind- and of the Reese River Valley, Central Nevada. water-eroded rockshelter (CA-RIV-519) in the Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Colorado Desert. The site lies within the Davis. ethnographic territory of the Desert Cahuilla 1972 A Computer Simulation Model of Great (Barrows 1900: 25; Kroeber 1925: 694; Basin Shoshonean Subsistence and Settle­ Strong 1929: 37; Bean 1978: 575). This ment Patterns. In: Models in Archaeology, report describes the rockshelter and the vessel David L. Clarke, ed., pp. 671-704. London: and its contents, and provides a short discus­ Methuen. sion of the cultural context in which the 1973 An Empirical Test for Steward's Model of cache occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter IV. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
    Chapter IV. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES City of Banning General Plan WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT PURPOSE The Water Resources Element addresses water quality, availability and conservation for the City’s current and future needs. The Element also discusses the importance of on-going coordination and cooperation between the City, Banning Heights Mutual Water Company, High Valley Water District, San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency and other agencies responsible for supplying water to the region. Topics include the ground water replenishment program, consumptive demand of City residents, and wastewater management and its increasingly important role in the protection of ground water resources. The goals, policies and programs set forth in this element direct staff and other City officials in the management of this essential resource. BACKGROUND The Water Resources Element is directly related to the Land Use Element, in considering the availability of water resources to meet the land use plan; and has a direct relationship to the Flooding and Hydrology Element, in its effort to protect and enhance groundwater recharge. Water issues are also integral components of the following elements: Police and Fire Protection, Economic Development, Emergency Preparedness, and Water, Wastewater and Utilities. The Water Resources Element addresses topics set forth in California Government Code Section 65302(d). Also, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 21083.2(g), the City is empowered to require that adequate research and documentation be conducted when the potential for significant impacts to water and other important resources exists. Watersheds The westernmost part of the planning area is located at the summit of the San Gorgonio Pass, which divides two major watersheds: the San Jacinto River Watershed to the west and the Salton Sea watershed to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Cathedral City Comprehensive General Plan
    CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN Prepared for City of Cathedral City 68-700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero Cathedral City, CA 92234 Prepared by Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc. 400 South Farrell, Suite B-205 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Adopted July 31, 2002 Amended November 18, 2009 City of Cathedral City General Plan/Table of Contents CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY GENERAL PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION I Introduction – amended 6/24/2009 I-1 II. ADMINISTRATION ELEMENT – amended 6/24/2009 II-1 III. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Land Use Element – amended 6/24/2009 III-1 B. Circulation Element – amended 6/24/2009 III-27 C. Housing Element – adopted 11/18/2009 III-61 D. Parks and Recreation Element – amended 6/24/2009 III-121 E. Community Image and Urban Design Element – amended 6/24/2009 III-137 F. Economic and Fiscal Element – amended 6/24/2009 III-153 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES A. Biological Resources Element – amended 6/24/2009 IV-1 B. Archaeological and Historic Resources Element IV-23 C. Water Resources Element IV-38 D. Air Quality Element IV-51 E. Open Space and Conservation Element – amended 6/24/2009 IV-61 F. Energy and Mineral Resources Element – amended 6/24/2009 IV-74 V. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS A. Geotechnical Element V-1 B. Flooding and Hydrology Element V-24 C. Noise Element – amended 6/24/2009 V-37 D. Hazardous and Toxic Materials Element V-53 VI. PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES A. Water, Sewer and Utilities Element – amended 6/24/2009 VI-1 B.
    [Show full text]
  • The California Desert CONSERVATION AREA PLAN 1980 As Amended
    the California Desert CONSERVATION AREA PLAN 1980 as amended U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Desert District Riverside, California the California Desert CONSERVATION AREA PLAN 1980 as Amended IN REPLY REFER TO United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT STATE OFFICE Federal Office Building 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, California 95825 Dear Reader: Thank you.You and many other interested citizens like you have made this California Desert Conservation Area Plan. It was conceived of your interests and concerns, born into law through your elected representatives, molded by your direct personal involvement, matured and refined through public conflict, interaction, and compromise, and completed as a result of your review, comment and advice. It is a good plan. You have reason to be proud. Perhaps, as individuals, we may say, “This is not exactly the plan I would like,” but together we can say, “This is a plan we can agree on, it is fair, and it is possible.” This is the most important part of all, because this Plan is only a beginning. A plan is a piece of paper-what counts is what happens on the ground. The California Desert Plan encompasses a tremendous area and many different resources and uses. The decisions in the Plan are major and important, but they are only general guides to site—specific actions. The job ahead of us now involves three tasks: —Site-specific plans, such as grazing allotment management plans or vehicle route designation; —On-the-ground actions, such as granting mineral leases, developing water sources for wildlife, building fences for livestock pastures or for protecting petroglyphs; and —Keeping people informed of and involved in putting the Plan to work on the ground, and in changing the Plan to meet future needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Bighorn Sheep Report
    California Department of Fish and Wildlife Region 6 Desert Bighorn Sheep Status Report November 2013 to October 2016 A summary of desert bighorn sheep population monitoring and management by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Authors: Paige Prentice, Ashley Evans, Danielle Glass, Richard Ianniello, and Tom Stephenson Inland Deserts Region California Department of Fish and Wildlife Desert Bighorn Status Report 2013-2016 California Department of Fish and Wildlife Inland Deserts Region 787 N. Main Street Ste. 220 Bishop, CA 93514 www.wildlife.ca.gov This document was finalized on September 6, 2018 Page 2 of 40 California Department of Fish and Wildlife Desert Bighorn Status Report 2013-2016 Table of Contents Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………4 I. Monitoring ............................................................................................................................................ 6 A. Data Collection Methods .................................................................................................................. 7 1. Capture Methods .......................................................................................................................... 7 2. Survey Methods ............................................................................................................................ 8 B. Results and Discussion .................................................................................................................... 10 1. Capture Data ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Linkchapter
    Index (Italic page numbers indicate major references) Abalone Cove landslide, California, Badger Spring, Nevada, 92, 94 Black Dyke Formation, Nevada, 69, 179, 180, 181, 183 Badwater turtleback, California, 128, 70, 71 abatement districts, California, 180 132 Black Mountain Basalt, California, Abrigo Limestone, Arizona, 34 Bailey ash, California, 221, 223 135 Acropora, 7 Baked Mountain, Alaska, 430 Black Mountains, California, 121, Adams Argillite, Alaska, 459, 462 Baker’s Beach, California, 267, 268 122, 127, 128, 129 Adobe Range, Nevada, 91 Bald Peter, Oregon, 311 Black Point, California, 165 Adobe Valley, California, 163 Balloon thrust fault, Nevada, 71, 72 Black Prince Limestone, Arizona, 33 Airport Lake, California, 143 Banning fault, California, 191 Black Rapids Glacier, Alaska, 451, Alabama Hills, California, 152, 154 Barrett Canyon, California, 202 454, 455 Alaska Range, Alaska, 442, 444, 445, Barrier, The, British Columbia, 403, Blackhawk Canyon, California, 109, 449, 451 405 111 Aldwell Formation, Washington, 380 Basin and Range Province, 29, 43, Blackhawk landslide, California, 109 algae 48, 51, 53, 73, 75, 77, 83, 121, Blackrock Point, Oregon, 295 Oahu, 6, 7, 8, 10 163 block slide, California, 201 Owens Lake, California, 150 Basin Range fault, California, 236 Blue Lake, Oregon, 329 Searles Valley, California, 142 Beacon Rock, Oregon, 324 Blue Mountains, Oregon, 318 Tatonduk River, Alaska, 459 Bear Meadow, Washington, 336 Blue Mountain unit, Washington, 380 Algodones dunes, California, 101 Bear Mountain fault zone, California,
    [Show full text]
  • MASTER HIKE Filecomp
    Edition 2: December 22, 2011 SCPD HIKES LISTED BY DIFFICULTY Key: ABSP: Anza-Borrego State Park; CVP: Coachella Valley Preserve; JTNP: Joshua Tree National Park; PCT: Pacific Crest Trail EASY Bear Creek Trail Butler-Abrams Trail CVP, Biskra Palms Oasis CVP, Guided Tour, Sand Dunes CVP, McCallum Grove Oasis Earl Henderson Trail Indian Canyon Sampler Indio Hills Walkabout, I Indio Hills Walkabout, II JTNP, Barker Dam and Wall Street Mill JTNP, Keys Ranch Tour & Hidden Valley Hike JTNP, Pine City Plus Living Desert Private Walking Tour Lower Palm Canyon Mecca Hills, Big Utah Canyon Mecca Hills, Little Painted Canyon Walkabout Morrow Trail (Beginning) La Quinta Cove Loop Oak Glen, Redwoods, Tri-Tip Sandwich & Apple Pie Randall Henderson Trail Salton Sea Bat Caves Sonny Bono Refuge Center, Obsidian Butte & Mud Volcanoes Tahquitz Canyon Waterfalls Trail Whitewater Preserve: Wine & Wildflowers EASY/MODERATE ABSP, Borrego Palm Canyon Bear Canyon Big Morongo Canyon Preserve Bump & Grind (Beginner’s) Carrizo Canyon CVP, Bee Rock Mesa Ridge CVP, Hidden Palms CVP, Moon Rock Trail & Canyon Wash Loop CVP, Willis Palms Trail Ernie Maxwell Scenic Trail Long Valley Hike Mecca Hills, Big Split Rock/ Slot Canyon Walkabout Mecca Hills, Little Painted Canyon Walkabout Whitewater Canyon View Loop MODERATE ABSP, Calcite Mine Big Morongo Canyon (One Way) Bump & Grind/ Herb Jeffries/ Mike Schuler Loop Bump & Grind (by Moonlight) CVP, Bee Rock Mesa & Pushawalla Canyon CVP, Herman’s Peak Hike CVP, Horseshoe Palms Hike CVP, Pushawalla Canyon Eisenhower Peak Loop,
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.11 Aesthetics Jan 11 02 SM Rev 4
    3.11 Aesthetics 3.11.1 Introduction and Summary This section presents the environmental setting and impacts related to aesthetic resources in the four geographic subregions. The aesthetic characteristics of an area are determined by the manner in which the resources contained in that area are perceived. Baseline aesthetic conditions are primarily described in terms of existing visual resources. Aesthetics discussions related to the Salton Sea also include a description of the olfactory character (odors) of that specific geographic subregion, which are briefly described below. Visual resources along the LCR include volcanic mountain ranges and hills; distinctive sand dunes; broad areas of the Joshua tree, alkali scrub, and cholla communities; and elevated river terraces (California Department of Water Resources [DWR] 1994). Views of the LCR occur at various locations along I-95. The IID water service area is characterized visually by substantial agricultural production and associated heavy machinery. Beyond the IID water service area, deserts, sand dunes, mountains, and the Salton Sea characterize the visual resources. Visual resources in the area of the Salton Sea geographic subregion include various landforms, vegetation, man-made structures, and the Sea itself. The Salton Sea covers approximately 211,000 acres (330 square miles) and is immediately surrounded by a sparsely vegetated desert landscape, which gives way to rocky, sandy hills (SSA and Reclamation 2000). The presence of odors at the Salton Sea currently affects both visitor numbers and resident populations in the area. Factors contributing to odors at the Salton Sea include water quality, high nutrient levels, and biological factors, such as fish and bird die-offs.
    [Show full text]