DOCSLIB.ORG

Army National Guard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Army National Guard Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under FOIA DCN: 10783 THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 30 10 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 2030 1-3010 ACQUISITION. TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS NOV 3 0 2904 MEMORANDUM FOR INFRASTRUCTURE STEERING GROUP (ISG) MEMBERS SUBJECT: Coordination on Scenario Conflicts Proposed Resolutions As agreed at the October 15,2004, Infrastructure Steering Group meeting, the DASs were to brief only those scenarios for which they could not agree on a proposed resolution. Because the DAS's review of the seventh batch of scenarios indicated there were no issues for in-person ISG deliberations, we will obtain your concurrence on the DAS's newly proposed resolutions via paper. The attached package includes all 5 18 scenarios registered in the tracking tool as of November 12,2004. A summary of these scenarios, broken out by category (Independent, Enabling, Conflicting, Deleted, and Not Ready for Categorization) can be found at TAB 1. The section titled "New Conflicts Settled" includes new scenario conflicts on which the DASs and affected JCSGs agree regarding the proposed resolution (TAB 2). TAB 3 represents the one contested conflict resolution for an E&T and Air Force scenario. Discussions regarding this issue are scheduled for the December 3,2004, ISG meeting. Details of the remaining scenarios, by category (Old Conflicts Settled, Independent, Enabling, Deleted, and Not Ready for Categorization), are provided on a disc at TAB 4-8. Request your written concurrence on the proposed resolutions (TAB 2) by close of business on Fridav. December 3.2004. (~ctin~~~~/(Ac~uisition, Technology & Logistics) Chairman, Infrastructure Steering Group Attachment: As stated cc: Joint Cross-Service Groups Chairs Deliberative Document - For DiscussionCj Purp ses Only - Do Not Release Under FOIA INDEX Tab 1 – Summary of Scenarios Registered Tab 2 – New Conflicts Settled Tab 3 – Not Resolved Tab 4 – Old Conflicts Settled - disc Tab 5 – Independent - disc Tab 6 – Enabling - disc Tab 7 – Deleted - disc Tab 8 – Not ready for Categorization - disc Scenarios Registered (Scenarios as of 12Nov 04) DAS Review 24 Nov 04 Total Not Ready for Independent Enabling Conflicting Deleted Categorization 119 20 44 47 8: USA-0005, 0025,0037, Army 0042, 0043, 0052, 0071, 0079 69 28 32 5 4: DoN-0027, 0028, 0029, DoN 0030 15: USAF-0001, 0002, 0004, 0005, 29 11 2 1 ooo9, 0019, 0020, 0021,0022, 0023, Air Force 0024, 0025, 0026, 0028, 0029 36 1 17 16 2: E&T-0011, 0019 Ed & Training 109 1 74 25 9: H&SA-0023, 0037, 0038, 0039, 0052, 0054, 0066, 0073, H&SA 0091 53 6 7 19 16 5: IND-0002, 0005, 0007, Industrial 0010, 0011 11 0 3 5 3: INTEL-0001, 0002, 0008 Intelligence 32 0 28 4 Medical 26 9 9 6 2: S&S-0001, 0002 Supply & Storage 34 7 8 11 8: TECH-0011, 0015, 0016, Technical 0021, 0022, 0023, 0024, 0025 TOTAL 518 83 224 19 136 56 Draft Deliberative Document –For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA 1 New Conflicts Settled Deliberative Document –For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA 1 Redacted E&T-0031, H&SA-0045, 0048, 0071, 0072, 0076, 0099 & 0100, & INT-0005 – Ft Meade Conflicts New n Facilities (E&T-0031, H&SA-0045, 0048, 0071, 0072, 0076, 0099, & 0100, & INT-0005) Previous n Facilities (H&SA-0045, 0048, 0071, 0072, 0076, 0099, & 0100, & INT-0005) Proposed Resolution New n Continue with original scenario (E&T-0031) n E&T already has a scenario (E&T-0030) that does not use Ft Meade (E&T-0031) Previous n Continue with original scenario(s) (H&SA-0045, 0048, 0071, 0072, 0076, 0099, & 0100 & INT-0005) n INT already has scenarios (INT-0003 & 0004) that use other locations. (INT-0005). n Direct H&SA to develop and analyze scenario(s) that do not use Ft Meade (H&SA-0045, 0048, 0071, 0072, & 0076) •Note: H&SA has developed scenarios (H&SA-0046, 0047, 0049, & 0072) that use other locations (H&SA-0045, 0048, 0072, 0076, & 0100) n H&SA already has a scenario (H&SA-0098) that uses other locations (H&SA-0099) Deliberative Document –For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA 3 E&T-0028, 0034, & 0036, H&SA-0055, 0057, & 0063, & MED-0013 – Fort Eustis Scenarios Involved Conflicts n Consolidate senior service colleges, national war colleges New and industrial college as a single school under the n Facilities – (E&T-0028, 0034, & 0036, & H&SA- National Defense University at Ft Eustis. (E&T-0028) 0055, 0057 & 0063) n Realign senior service colleges under the National n Doctrinal – Senior Service colleges under NDU Defense University with the national war colleges and (E&T-0028, 0034, & 0036) industrial colleges co-located but under their chain of command. (E&T-0034) Previous n Realign senior service colleges under the National Defense University and relocate to Ft Eustis. (E&T- n Cultural – AF patients at Army facility (MED- 0036) 0013) n Realign Ft McPherson, GA by co-locating FORSCOM and USARC at Ft Eustis, VA. (H&SA-0055) Proposed Resolution n Realign Ft Monroe, VA, Naval Station Norfolk, and New JFCOM leased facilities in Suffolk, VA by co-locating n Continue with original scenarios (E&T-0028, TRADOC (minus Army Accessions Command and 0034, & 0036, & H&SA-0055, 0057 & 0063) Cadet Command), JFCOM HQ, and JFCOM leased n Direct H&SA to develop scenarios that do not use facilities in Suffolk, VA to Ft. Eustis, VA. (H&SA-0057 Ft Eustis (H&SA-0063) n Realign Washington Navy Yard and 1 leased location in Alexandria, Virginia by co-locating USN Military Sealift n E&T and H&SA already have scenarios (E&T- Command (COMSC) and USA Surface Deployment and 0025, 0026 & 0027, & H&SA-0060 & 0083) that Distribution Command (SDDC) with existing SDDC use other locations (E&T-0028, 0034, & 0036, & offices at Ft. Eustis. (H&SA-0063) H&SA-0055, & 0057) n Disestablish Langley AFB Medical Facility and move patient workload to expanded Fort Eustis Medical Facility. Previous (MED-0013) n Continue with original scenario. (MED-0013) Deliberative Document –For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA 4 DoN 0033 & MED-0023 – SUBASE New London Scenarios Involved Conflicts n Close SUBASE New London, CT n Force Structure – (DoN-0004, & (D0N-0033) 0033, IND-0003 & 0026, & MED-0023) n Create Tri-service Biomedical research centers of excellence at four sites by relocating hyperbaric Proposed Resolution medicine department, NMRC to n Continue with Original Scenarios SUBASE New London. (MED- (DoN-0033 & MED-0023) 0023) n Direct MED to develop and analyze a scenario that does not use SUBASE New London. (MED-0023) Deliberative Document –For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA 5 E&T-0027, 0033, & 0035, H&SA-0041, 0094, & 0108 – MCB Quantico Scenarios Involved Scenarios Involved n Consolidate the United States Army War College, Air n Realign NSA New Orleans, LA by co-locating Marine War College, College of Naval Warfare, Marine Corps Corps Recruiting Command with HQ Marine Corps War College, National War College, and the Industrial and Marine Corps Recruiting Command at MCB College of the Armed Forces as a single school under Quantico, VA. (H&SA-0041) the National Defense University at MCB Quantico. n Relocate Marine Corps Reserve Command by (E&T-0027) realigning NSA New Orleans, LA by relocating with n Consolidate the United States Army War College, Air HQ Marine Corps and Marine Corps Recruiting War College, College of Naval Warfare, and the Command at MCB Quantico, VA. (H&SA-0094) Marine Corps War College as a single school under the n Realign Washington Navy Yard, Andrews AFB, and National Defense University at MCB Quantico. The Ft. Belvoir by co-locating Navy Criminal Investigation National War College, and the Industrial College of the Service, AF Office of Special Investigation, and USA Armed Forces will co-locate at MCB Quantico, but Criminal Investigation Command at MCB Quantico. with retention of the current chain of command. (E&T- (H&SA-0108) 0033) n Consolidate the United States Army War College, Air War College, College of Naval Warfare, and the Marine Corps War College under the National Defense University at MCB Quantico. (E&T-0035) Deliberative Document –For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA 6 E&T-0027, 0033, & 0035, H&SA-0041, 0094, & 0108 – MCB Quantico Conflicts n Facilities – (E&T-0027, 0033, & 0035, H&SA-0041, 0094, & 0108) n Doctrinal – (E&T-0027, 0033, & 0035) Proposed Resolution n Continue with original scenarios (E&T-0027, 0033, & 0035, H&SA-0041, 0094, 0108) n Direct H&SA to develop and analyze scenarios that do not use MCB Quantico facilities. (H&SA-0041, 0094 ) n E&T and H&SA already have scenarios (E&T-0028, 0032, & 0036 and H&SA-0076) that use other locations (E&T-0027, 0033, & 0035 and H&SA-0108) Deliberative Document –For Discussion Purposes Only – Do Not Release Under FOIA 7 H&SA-0070 & 0106 & MED-0023 & 0024 – Walter Reed Army Medical Center Scenarios Involved Conflicts n Close 1 and realign 5 leased locations in the n Facilities – (H&SA-0070 & 0106 NCR, Bolling AFB and Potomac Medical Annex by relocating medical activities to & MED-0023 & 0024) Walter Reed Medical Center (H&SA-0070) n Close 9 and realign 26 leased locations by relocating OSD components to Walter Proposed Resolution Reed Medical Center (H&SA-0106) n Continue with original scenarios n Create Tri-Service Biomedical/Research Centers at 4 locations by relocating Division (H&SA-0070 & 0106 & MED-0023 & of Retrovirology, WRAIR, and the Vacuum 0024) Research Program NMRC to Walter Reed n Direct H&SA and MED to develop and Medical Center.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4 NR 1 Z6\Oc> [Qlaq
    MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR Eligible: yes. DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FORM no Property Name: Building 516 Inventory Number: M: 36-59 Address: Fort Glen Annex City: Silver Spring Vicinity Zip Code: 20901 County: Montgomery USGS Topographic Map: Kensington , • • • Owner: US Army—Department of Defense Is the property being evaluated a district? yes Tax Parcel Number: NA Tax Map Number: NA Tax Account ID Number: NA ' Project: ICRMP Preparation Agency: U.S. Army Garrison, Ft. Detrick •Site visit by MHT Staff: no X yes Name: Amanda Apple Date: 18 February 2010 Is the property located within a historic district? yes X no If the property is within a district District Inventory Number: NR-listed district yes Eligible district yes District Name: Preparer's Recommendation: Contributing resource yes no Non-contributing but eligible in another context If the property is not within a district (or the property is a district) Preparer's Recommendation: Eligible X yes no Criteria: X A B C D Considerations: A B C D E F X G None Documentation on the property/district is presented in: Maryland Historical Trust, draft National Register of Historic Places nomination Description of Property and Eligibility Determination: (Use continuation sheet if necessary and attach map and photo) General Description Building 516 is a rectangular building completed ca. 1961 as the Diamond Ordnance Radiation Facility (DORF). The building is sited atop a full basement and is roughly two stories in height. Construction materials of Building 516 include reinforced concrete, concrete block, and a structural steel roof system. The exterior of the building is running bond brick with slight projections in the wall plane denoting main structural elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
    Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LXII Department of Defense Office of the Secretary Base Closures and Realignments (BRAC); Notice VerDate jul<14>2003 10:07 May 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16MYN2.SGM 16MYN2 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Headquarters U.S. Army Forces Budget/Funding, Contracting, Command (FORSCOM), and the Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Office of the Secretary Headquarters U.S. Army Reserve Customer Services, Item Management, Command (USARC) to Pope Air Force Stock Control, Weapon System Base Closures and Realignments Base, NC. Relocate the Headquarters 3rd Secondary Item Support, Requirements (BRAC) U.S. Army to Shaw Air Force Base, SC. Determination, Integrated Materiel AGENCY: Department of Defense. Relocate the Installation Management Management Technical Support ACTION: Notice of Recommended Base Agency Southeastern Region Inventory Control Point functions for Closures and Realignments. Headquarters and the U.S. Army Consumable Items to Defense Supply Network Enterprise Technology Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is Command (NETCOM) Southeastern them as Defense Logistics Agency authorized to recommend military Region Headquarters to Fort Eustis, VA. Inventory Control Point functions; installations inside the United States for Relocate the Army Contracting Agency relocate the procurement management closure and realignment in accordance Southern Region Headquarters to Fort and related support functions for Depot with Section 2914(a) of the Defense Base Sam Houston. Level Reparables to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and designate them as Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as Operational Army (IGPBS) amended (Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Government Manual 2009/2010
    The United States Government Manual 2009/2010 Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration The artwork used in creating this cover are derivatives of two pieces of original artwork created by and copyrighted 2003 by Coordination/Art Director: Errol M. Beard, Artwork by: Craig S. Holmes specifically to commemorate the National Archives Building Rededication celebration held September 15-19, 2003. See Archives Store for prints of these images. VerDate Nov 24 2008 15:39 Oct 26, 2009 Jkt 217558 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6996 Sfmt 6996 M:\GOVMAN\217558\217558.000 APPS06 PsN: 217558 dkrause on GSDDPC29 with $$_JOB Revised September 15, 2009 Raymond A. Mosley, Director of the Federal Register. Adrienne C. Thomas, Acting Archivist of the United States. On the cover: This edition of The United States Government Manual marks the 75th anniversary of the National Archives and celebrates its important mission to ensure access to the essential documentation of Americans’ rights and the actions of their Government. The cover displays an image of the Rotunda and the Declaration Mural, one of the 1936 Faulkner Murals in the Rotunda at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Building in Washington, DC. The National Archives Rotunda is the permanent home of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights. These three documents, known collectively as the Charters of Freeedom, have secured the the rights of the American people for more than two and a quarter centuries. In 2003, the National Archives completed a massive restoration effort that included conserving the parchment of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, and re-encasing the documents in state-of-the-art containers.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Conflicts Settled, Independent, Enabling, Deleted, and Not Ready for Categorization), Are Provided on a Disc at TAB 3-7
    DCN: 10780 Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only - Do Not Release Under FOIA THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 30 10 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON. DC 2030 1-3010 ACQUISITION. TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS MEMORANDUM FOR INFRASTRUCTURE STEERING GROUP (ISG) MEMBERS SUBJECT: Coordination on Scenario Conflicts Proposed Resolutions - 805 Scenarios There are no regularly scheduled ISG meetings for the next two weeks to accommodate the holiday schedule; however, we do need to obtain ISG concurrence on the DAS's newly proposed conflict resolutions, as attached. The attached package includes all 805 scenarios registered in the tracking tool as of December 10,2004. A summary of these scenarios, broken out by category (Independent, Enabling, Conflicting, Deleted, and Not Ready for Categorization) can be found at TAB I. The section titled "New Conflicts Settled" includes new scenario conflicts on which the DASs and affected JCSGs agree regarding the proposed resolution (TAB 2). Details of the remaining scenarios, hy category (Old Conflicts Settled, Independent, Enabling, Deleted, and Not Ready for Categorization), are provided on a disc at TAB 3-7. Request your written concurrence on the proposed resolutions (TAB 2) by close of business on Monday, January 3,2005. ; ,; ,/, - A/ * A 4 14, ,,.. ,A ,",/.* '< ' / Midlael W. Wynne /' Acting USD (Acquisition, Technology & Logistics) Chairman, Infrastructure Steering Group Attachment: As stated cc: Joint Cross-Service Groups Chairs Deliberative Document - For Discussion p;rp&es Only - Do Not Release
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Pilot and Air Traffic Control Experiences & Automation Management Strategies on UAS Mission Task Performance
    Theses - Daytona Beach Dissertations and Theses Fall 2009 The Effect of Pilot and Air Traffic Control Experiences & Automation Management Strategies on UAS Mission Task Performance Christopher J. Reynolds Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/db-theses Part of the Aviation Commons, and the Multi-Vehicle Systems and Air Traffic Control Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Reynolds, Christopher J., "The Effect of Pilot and Air Traffic Control Experiences & Automation Management Strategies on UAS Mission Task Performance" (2009). Theses - Daytona Beach. 173. https://commons.erau.edu/db-theses/173 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University – Daytona Beach at ERAU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in the Theses - Daytona Beach collection by an authorized administrator of ERAU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EFFECT OF PILOT AND AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL EXPERIENCES & AUTOMATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ON UAS MISSION TASK PERFORMANCE by CHRISTOPHER J. REYNOLDS B.S., Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, 2005 B.S., Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, 2006 A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Human Factors & Systems in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Human Factors and Systems. Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach, FL Fall, 2009 UMI Number: EP31993 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of the STREET CAR LINES of MONTGOMERY COUNTY by William J
    The Beall-Dawson House, 1815 home of the Montgomery County Historical Society 103 W.MontgomeryAve. Rockville,Maryland Thomas M. Anderson Mrs. Neal Fitzsimons President Editor Vol. 17 May, 1974 No. 2 HISTORY OF THE STREET CAR LINES OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY By William J. Ellenberger* Introduction by the Editor: By now, Connecticut born Frank J. Sprague, 1857- 1934, Naval Academy graduate and Thomas Edison's protege, has a well earned place in history as the father of the American electric street railway. With the exception of those who were well acquainted with his work and inventions, it was not always the case; for one must sympathize with those inventors who competed in Edison's circle. As happened in Sprague's lifetime, Edison's genius and reputation quite overshadowed other innovators of his era. Because Sprague's electric propulsion motor was made possible by Edison's constant-voltage distribution system, just as Edison's work was made posstble by other's inventions (e.g., Morse and Bell); and because of the Sprague-Edison early *Mr. Ellenberger, a professional engineer for nearly forty years, has lived in Washington, D. C. since he was a year old. He holds a degree in both electrical engineering (1930) and mechanical engineering (1934) from George Washington Univer• sity. He was employed by the Potomac Electric Power Company for ten years prior to World War II, and he taught electric railway engineering at George Washington Univer• s ity in 1941. -2- collaboration, confusion is understandable. In truth, Edison was not a modest man. Roger Burl ingame wrote of Edison, "Often when he was given credit for something like electric traction which belonged, in toto, to others, he seems simply to have refused comment .11 Edison stated in an interview in 1884 (the same year that Sprague left Edison to form his own company), III have not given much thought to the substitution of elec• tricity for horses on surface street ca'rs ," Subsequent biographers and engineering colleagues of Sprague, as well as Spraguels second wife, Harriet, who published in 1947, Frank J.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome Naval War College Class of 2018-2019
    August 23, 2018 Edition Welcome Naval War College Class of 2018-2019 IN THIS ISSUE: CHAPLAIN SCHOOL RETURNING TO NEWPORT SALUTE TO SUMMER THIS SATURDAY NOAA SHIP HENRY BIGELOW DEPLOYS NEW TECHNOLOGY NWC HOLDS FUTURE WARFIGHTING SYMPOSIUM CPO SELECTEES ON THE MOVE Inside this issue: Around the Station 2-5 Salute to Summer Info 6 BZ Shipmates 7-8 Fleet & Family Support 9 At the Clinic 10 Morale, Welfare & Rec. 11 Rear Adm. Jeffrey A. Harley, president, U.S. Meat & Potatoes of Life 12 Naval War College (NWC), (top) addresses students, staff, faculty and guests dur- ing a convocation ceremony kicking off the 2018-2019 academic year. After their Now Hear This 13 completion of NWC’s 10-month Joint Professional Military Education (JPME) programs, students earn JPME credit and either a NWC diploma or a master’s de- gree in National Security and Strategic Studies or Defense and Strategic Studies. Traffic & Commuting 14-15 Rear Adm. Jeffrey A. Harley presents a Distinguished Graduate Leadership Award (DGLA) to retired Adm. Scott Swift (above right). The award honors NWC gradu- Around the Fleet 16-17 ates who have earned positions of prominence in the national defense field. An ac- tor portraying Rear Adm. Stephen B. Luce, (above left) founder and first president Veteran’s News 18-19 of U.S. Naval War College (NWC) addresses students, staff, faculty and guests during a convocation ceremony kicking off the 2018-2019 academic year. (U.S. Navy photos by Sera Johnson and MC2 Jessica Lewis/released) 1 AROUND THE STATION... Navy Religious Ministry Training Relocates to Newport and Meridian From Naval Education and Training our professional reli- Command Public Affairs gious ministry team PENSACOLA, Fla.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Systems Integration Is Worth the Money and Effort! the Argument for the Implementation of Human Systems Integration Processes in Defence Capability Acquisition
    Human Systems Integration is worth the money and effort! The argument for the implementation of Human Systems Integration processes in Defence capability acquisition Defence Intranet ohsc.defence.gov.au/ Defence Internet www.defence.gov.au/dpe/ohsc PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Human Systems Integration is worth the money and effort! The argument for the implementation of Human Systems iii Integration processes in Defence capability acquisition Prepared for: Human Systems Integration Framework, Occupational Health & Safety Branch People Strategies and Policy Group, Department of Defence Canberra, ACT, 2600 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Burgess-Limerick, Robin. Title: Human Systems Integration is worth the money and effort! The argument for the implementation of Human Systems Integration processes in Defence capability acquisition [electronic resource] / prepared by Robin Burgess-Limerick, Cristina Cotea, Eva Pietrzak. ISBN: 9780642297327 (pdf) Subjects: Australia. Dept. of Defence. Human engineering. Systems engineering. Automation–Human factors. Other Authors/Contributors: Cotea, Cristina. Pietrzak, Eva. Defence Occupational Health and Safety Branch (Australia). Dewey Number: 620.8 iv Conditions of Release and Disposal © Commonwealth of Australia 2010 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Department of Defence. Announcement statement—may be announced to the public. Secondary release—may be released to the public. All Defence information, whether classified or not, is protected from unauthorised disclosure under the Crimes Act 1914. Defence information may only be released in accordance with the Defence Protective Security Manual (SECMAN 4) and/or Defence Instruction (General) OPS 13–4—Release of Classified Defence Information to Other Countries, as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Glen Annex Child Development Center 2 – Vicinity Map
    Child Development Center 2 USAG Forest Glen Annex Silver Spring, MD Preliminary & Final Design Submission for the NCPC May 1, 2013 Commission Hearing USAG Fort Detrick Forest Glen Annex 2460 Stephen Sitter Ave., Building 601 Directorate of Public Works Master Planning Office Silver Spring, MD Submitted: 30 January 2013 Rev. 31 January 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT REPORT a) Agency b) Agency Point of Contact c) Site Area & Land Allocation d) Area of Building and Surface Parking e) Existing and Projected Employment f) Relation to Master Plan g) Coordination with Local Government & COG h) Schedule of Construction and Occupancy i) Project Cost & Funding Source 2. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION a) Background b) Project Site c) Stormwater Management d) Landscape e) Building Design f) Interior Design g) Parking h) Utilities i) Fire & Sprinkler System j) Energy Conservation & LEED 3. DOCUMENTATION a) NEPA b) SHPO c) SUPPORTING DRAWINGS & MAPS a) Vicinity Map b) Installation Map c) Installation Map Detail d) Landscape, Grading & Utility Plan e) Rendering f) Floor Plan g) Elevations h) Roof Plan i) Site Demolition j) Erosion Plan k) Storm Water Plan l) Storm Water Plan (Cont’d) m) Parking 1. PROJECT REPORT a. AGENCY: United States Army Garrison Fort Detrick Forest Glen Annex 2460 Stephen Sitter Ave., Building 601A Silver Spring, MD 20910 b. AGENCY POC: ATTN: Mr. William Crane, Garrison Manager United States Army Garrison Fort Detrick Forest Glen Annex 2460 Stephen Sitter Ave., Building 601A Silver Spring, MD 20910 c. TOTAL AREA OF SITE & LAND ALLOCATION: Approximately 2.9 acres of the Forest Glen Annex’s 124 total acres are disturbed.
    [Show full text]
  • LCDR Stephen Fischer LCDR Stephen Fischer, Medical Corps
    Upd-11/4/2014 LCDR Stephen Fischer LCDR Stephen Fischer, Medical Corps, was born in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, where he has deep family roots, and he was raised in the Missouri Ozarks. LCDR Fischer earned his undergraduate degrees at Columbia University in the City of New York, double-majoring in Environmental Science (A.B.) and Chemical Engineering (B.S.). He then earned a Navy scholarship to attend New York University School of Medicine, earning the M.D. degree in 1999. LCDR Fischer completed his medical internship in New Orleans, Louisiana, and then served forward- deployed naval forces in the Western Pacific from 2000 through 2004, aboard Naval Hospital Yokosuka and Destroyer Squadron Fifteen (DESRON-15). LCDR Fischer subsequently trained as an Undersea ("diving") Medical Officer, returning to forward-deployed naval forces aboard Explosive Ordnance Disposal Mobile Unit Five (EODMU-5) in Guam, U.S. Marianas Islands, 2005 - 2007. LCDR Fischer underwent training as a Naval Flight Surgeon from 2007 to 2008, earning his wings with additional designation as FAA Aeromedical Examiner. The following two years LCDR Fischer performed dive and flight physicals at Brigade Medical Unit, Bancroft Hall, U.S. Naval Academy, while attending Johns Hopkins School of Public and specializing in Preventive Medicine. LCDR Fischer was stationed at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton from July 2010 through October 2013, during which he was deployed to Southwest Afghanistan for a year-long assignment with the Helmand Provincial Reconstruction Team (2012) collaborating with State Department's Regional Platform, USAID, USDA, UK Department for International Development, UK Foreign Commonwealth Office and the Danish International Development Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • 36Th Commencement Exercises Saturday, the Sixteenth of May · Two Thousand Fifteen
    Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences “Learning to Care for Those in Harm’s Way” 36th Commencement Exercises Saturday, the Sixteenth of May · Two Thousand Fifteen The Mace he mace was a weapon of war originating with the loaded club and stone Thammer of primitive man. Although it continued to be used as a weapon through the Middle Ages, during this period it also became symbolic as an ornament representing power. Sergeants-at-Arms, who were guards of kings and other high officials, carried a mace to protect their monarch during processions. By the 14th century, the mace had become more ceremonial in use and was decorated with jewels and precious metals, losing its war-club appearance. Three hundred years later, the mace was used solely as a symbol of authority. The mace is used during sessions of legislative assemblies such as the U.S. House of Representatives, where it is placed to the right of the Speaker. More frequently, maces are seen at university commencements and convocations, exemplifying knowledge as power. The USU mace was a glorious gift from the Honorable Sam Nixon, MD, past chairman of the Board of Regents, and his wife, Elizabeth. The mace was used for the first time at the 1995 commencement ceremony. It is handcrafted in sterling silver and carries the seal of the university along with the emblems of the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force and Public Health Service. The university seal and service emblems are superimposed on the earth’s globe to symbolize the worldwide mission of the university and its graduates.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Review of the DON Uniformed Legal Communities
    (PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Background ........................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Core Themes — The Panel “Lens” .................................................................... 4 1.4 Report Structure ................................................................................................. 8 1.5 Findings & Recommendations ........................................................................... 8 1.6 Implementation Oversight ................................................................................ 11 1.7 Submission of Report ....................................................................................... 12 2. REVIEW SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY .............................................................. 13 2.1 SECNAV Direction ........................................................................................... 13 2.2 Previous Reviews ............................................................................................. 14 2.3 Information Gathering ...................................................................................... 16 2.3.1 Navy Working Group Summary ................................................................. 16 2.3.2 Marine Corps Working Group Summary
    [Show full text]