Structure and Functioning of the Northern Adriatic Coastal Ecosystem, Within the Context of the Marine Strategy Framework Implementation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mesh-Size Matters in Epibenthic Surveys
J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U. K. 12002), 82,1^8 Printed in the United Kingdom Mesh-size matters in epibenthic surveys Ruth Callaway*P, Simon JenningsP, John Lancaster* and John CotterO *University ofWales Swansea, School ofBiological Sciences, Singleton Park, Swansea, Wales, SA2 8PP. OCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Lowestoft, Norfolk, NR33 0HT. PCorresponding author 1ne¨ eR.Zu« hlke): e-mail: [email protected] This study aimed to identify the e¡ects of di¡erent sieve mesh-sizes on processing time, the number of species retained, diversity measures and multivariate community analysis in the North Sea. Samples were collected at 63 sites throughout the North Sea and washed through two successive sieves, 10-mm and 5-mm mesh respectively. Processing time for whole samples 15- and 10-mm fraction) averaged 91 Æ25 min compared with 55 Æ16 min for the 10-mm mesh fraction. Altogether 40% of free-living species and 9% of attached species were recorded exclusively in the 5-mm fraction. The majority of these species were rare. Spatial gradients of species diversity and community structure were identical, independent ofthe mesh-size used. Multivariate community analysis showed no signi¢cant di¡erence between descriptions ofcommunity structure based on fauna from 10-mm or 5-mm mesh. The use ofcoarser sieving mesh would save time and money, ifthe aims ofan epibenthic survey were to describe broad patterns ofcommunity structure and relative diversity. It would be possible to process approximately 50% more samples, ifthe time saved with 10-mm mesh were allocated to additional sampling. However, ifinformation on single species is required, then sorting with the ¢ner sieve mesh will yield crucial information. -
Phylum MOLLUSCA
285 MOLLUSCA: SOLENOGASTRES-POLYPLACOPHORA Phylum MOLLUSCA Class SOLENOGASTRES Family Lepidomeniidae NEMATOMENIA BANYULENSIS (Pruvot, 1891, p. 715, as Dondersia) Occasionally on Lafoea dumosa (R.A.T., S.P., E.J.A.): at 4 positions S.W. of Eddystone, 42-49 fm., on Lafoea dumosa (Crawshay, 1912, p. 368): Eddystone, 29 fm., 1920 (R.W.): 7, 3, 1 and 1 in 4 hauls N.E. of Eddystone, 1948 (V.F.) Breeding: gonads ripe in Aug. (R.A.T.) Family Neomeniidae NEOMENIA CARINATA Tullberg, 1875, p. 1 One specimen Rame-Eddystone Grounds, 29.12.49 (V.F.) Family Proneomeniidae PRONEOMENIA AGLAOPHENIAE Kovalevsky and Marion [Pruvot, 1891, p. 720] Common on Thecocarpus myriophyllum, generally coiled around the base of the stem of the hydroid (S.P., E.J.A.): at 4 positions S.W. of Eddystone, 43-49 fm. (Crawshay, 1912, p. 367): S. of Rame Head, 27 fm., 1920 (R.W.): N. of Eddystone, 29.3.33 (A.J.S.) Class POLYPLACOPHORA (=LORICATA) Family Lepidopleuridae LEPIDOPLEURUS ASELLUS (Gmelin) [Forbes and Hanley, 1849, II, p. 407, as Chiton; Matthews, 1953, p. 246] Abundant, 15-30 fm., especially on muddy gravel (S.P.): at 9 positions S.W. of Eddystone, 40-43 fm. (Crawshay, 1912, p. 368, as Craspedochilus onyx) SALCOMBE. Common in dredge material (Allen and Todd, 1900, p. 210) LEPIDOPLEURUS, CANCELLATUS (Sowerby) [Forbes and Hanley, 1849, II, p. 410, as Chiton; Matthews. 1953, p. 246] Wembury West Reef, three specimens at E.L.W.S.T. by J. Brady, 28.3.56 (G.M.S.) Family Lepidochitonidae TONICELLA RUBRA (L.) [Forbes and Hanley, 1849, II, p. -
Biogeographical Homogeneity in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. II
Vol. 19: 75–84, 2013 AQUATIC BIOLOGY Published online September 4 doi: 10.3354/ab00521 Aquat Biol Biogeographical homogeneity in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. II. Temporal variation in Lebanese bivalve biota Fabio Crocetta1,*, Ghazi Bitar2, Helmut Zibrowius3, Marco Oliverio4 1Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Villa Comunale, 80121, Napoli, Italy 2Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon 3Le Corbusier 644, 280 Boulevard Michelet, 13008 Marseille, France 4Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie ‘Charles Darwin’, University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, Viale dell’Università 32, 00185 Roma, Italy ABSTRACT: Lebanon (eastern Mediterranean Sea) is an area of particular biogeographic signifi- cance for studying the structure of eastern Mediterranean marine biodiversity and its recent changes. Based on literature records and original samples, we review here the knowledge of the Lebanese marine bivalve biota, tracing its changes during the last 170 yr. The updated checklist of bivalves of Lebanon yielded a total of 114 species (96 native and 18 alien taxa), accounting for ca. 26.5% of the known Mediterranean Bivalvia and thus representing a particularly poor fauna. Analysis of the 21 taxa historically described on Lebanese material only yielded 2 available names. Records of 24 species are new for the Lebanese fauna, and Lioberus ligneus is also a new record for the Mediterranean Sea. Comparisons between molluscan records by past (before 1950) and modern (after 1950) authors revealed temporal variations and qualitative modifications of the Lebanese bivalve fauna, mostly affected by the introduction of Erythraean species. The rate of recording of new alien species (evaluated in decades) revealed later first local arrivals (after 1900) than those observed for other eastern Mediterranean shores, while the peak in records in conjunc- tion with our samplings (1991 to 2010) emphasizes the need for increased field work to monitor their arrival and establishment. -
Tsmm.Pdf 5.573 Mb
ANÀLISI DELS DESCARTAMENTS EFECTUATS PER LA FLOTA D’ARROSSEGAMENT EN EL GOLF DE LLEÓ Sandra MALLOL MARTÍNEZ ISBN: 84-689-4625-7 Dipòsit legal: GI-1170-2005 Anàlisi dels descartaments efectuats per la fl ota d’arrossegament en el Golf de Lleó Sandra Mallol i Martínez Memòria redactada per Sandra Mallol i Martínez, 2005 inscrita al programa de doctorat de Biologia Ambiental, del Departament de Ciències Ambientals, per optar al grau de Doctor en Biologia per la Universitat de Girona. Aquest treball s’ha realitzat a l’Àrea de Zoologia del Departament de Ciències Ambientals de la Universitat de Girona sota la direcció de la Dra. Margarida Casadevall Masó i el Dr. Emili García-Berthou. coberta_SMallol.indd 1 23/05/2005, 11:49 Tesi Doctoral Anàlisi dels descartaments efectuats per la flota d’arrossegament en el Golf de Lleó Memòria redactada per Sandra Mallol i Martínez, inscrita al programa de doctorat de Biologia Ambiental del Departament de Ciències Ambientals, per a optar al grau de Doctora en Biologia per la Universitat de Girona. El present treball s’ha realitzat a l’Àrea de Zoologia de la Universitat de Girona sota la codirecció de la Dra. Margarida Casadevall Masó i el Dr. Emili García-Berthou. Sandra Mallol i Martínez Vist-i-plau dels directors, Dra. Margarida Casadevall Masó Dr. Emili García-Berthou Professora titular Professor titular Àrea de Zoologia Àrea d’Ecologia Departament de Ciències Ambientals Departament de Ciències Ambientals Universitat de Girona Universitat de Girona Girona, 2005 Al meu avi Falet, per haver-me ensenyat a estimar tant la mar Agraïments Quan un arriba al final de l’odissea de la tesi es fa difícil escriure aquest apartat sobretot per la por a obliadar-te d’algú, perdoneu si es dóna el cas. -
A Bioturbation Classification of European Marine Infaunal
A bioturbation classification of European marine infaunal invertebrates Ana M. Queiros 1, Silvana N. R. Birchenough2, Julie Bremner2, Jasmin A. Godbold3, Ruth E. Parker2, Alicia Romero-Ramirez4, Henning Reiss5,6, Martin Solan3, Paul J. Somerfield1, Carl Van Colen7, Gert Van Hoey8 & Stephen Widdicombe1 1Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, U.K. 2The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33 OHT, U.K. 3Department of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, U.K. 4EPOC – UMR5805, Universite Bordeaux 1- CNRS, Station Marine d’Arcachon, 2 Rue du Professeur Jolyet, Arcachon 33120, France 5Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, University of Nordland, Postboks 1490, Bodø 8049, Norway 6Department for Marine Research, Senckenberg Gesellschaft fu¨ r Naturforschung, Su¨ dstrand 40, Wilhelmshaven 26382, Germany 7Marine Biology Research Group, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281/S8, Ghent 9000, Belgium 8Bio-Environmental Research Group, Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research (ILVO-Fisheries), Ankerstraat 1, Ostend 8400, Belgium Keywords Abstract Biodiversity, biogeochemical, ecosystem function, functional group, good Bioturbation, the biogenic modification of sediments through particle rework- environmental status, Marine Strategy ing and burrow ventilation, is a key mediator of many important geochemical Framework Directive, process, trait. processes in marine systems. In situ quantification of bioturbation can be achieved in a myriad of ways, requiring expert knowledge, technology, and Correspondence resources not always available, and not feasible in some settings. Where dedi- Ana M. Queiros, Plymouth Marine cated research programmes do not exist, a practical alternative is the adoption Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, U.K. -
Chemical and Physical Dynamics of Marine Pockmarks with Insights Into the Organic Carbon Cycling on the Malin Shelf and in the Dunmanus Bay, Ireland
CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL DYNAMICS OF MARINE POCKMARKS WITH INSIGHTS INTO THE ORGANIC CARBON CYCLING ON THE MALIN SHELF AND IN THE DUNMANUS BAY, IRELAND BY Michal Szpak, M.Sc. Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisor: Dr Brian Kelleher Dublin City University School of Chemical Sciences March, 2012 Declaration I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Doctor of Philosophy is entirely my own work, that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge breach any law of copyright, and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: ____________ (Candidate) ID No.: ___________ Date: _______ Abstract Pockmarks are specific type of marine geological setting resembling craters or pits. They are considered surface expression of fluid flow in the marine subsurface. Pockmarks are widespread in the aquatic environment but the understanding of their formation mechanisms, relationship with marine macro- and micro-biota and their geochemistry remains limited. Despite numerous findings of these features in Irish waters they received little attention and remain poorly studied. In this work extensive geophysical data sets collected by the Irish National Seabed Survey and its successor the INFOMAR project as well in situ sediment samples were utilized to provide baseline information on the nature of some of these features, the processes they are fuelled by and their geochemical characteristics. -
Trpovi Jadrana I Njihova Ugroženost
Trpovi Jadrana i njihova ugroženost Bralić, Sara Undergraduate thesis / Završni rad 2017 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science / Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:217:818413 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-28 Repository / Repozitorij: Repository of Faculty of Science - University of Zagreb SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU PRIRODOSLOVNO-MATEMATIČKI FAKULTET BIOLOŠKI ODSJEK TRPOVI JADRANA I NJIHOVA UGROŽENOST SEA CUCUMBERS IN THE ADRIATIC AND HOW THEY ARE ENDANGERED SEMINARSKI RAD Sara Bralić Preddiplomski studij biologije (Undergraduate Study of Biology) Mentor: izv. prof. dr. sc. Petar Kružić Zagreb, 2017. SADRŽAJ 1. UVOD ................................................................................................................................. 2 2. BODLJIKAŠI ..................................................................................................................... 3 3. TRPOVI .............................................................................................................................. 6 3.1. TRPOVI U JADRANU ................................................................................................... 9 3.1.1. Holothuria tubulosa Gmelin 1791 ............................................................................ 9 3.1.2. Holothuria forskali Delle Chiaje, 1823.................................................................. -
BENTHIC FAUNA of the NORTH AEGEAN SEA II CRINOIDEA and HOLOTHURIOIDEA (ECHINODERMATA) Athanasios S
BENTHIC FAUNA OF THE NORTH AEGEAN SEA II CRINOIDEA AND HOLOTHURIOIDEA (ECHINODERMATA) Athanasios S. Koukouras, Apostolos I. Sinis To cite this version: Athanasios S. Koukouras, Apostolos I. Sinis. BENTHIC FAUNA OF THE NORTH AEGEAN SEA II CRINOIDEA AND HOLOTHURIOIDEA (ECHINODERMATA). Vie et Milieu / Life & Environment, Observatoire Océanologique - Laboratoire Arago, 1981, pp.271-281. hal-03010387 HAL Id: hal-03010387 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03010387 Submitted on 17 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. VIE MILIEU, 1981, 31 (3-4): 271-281 FAUNA OF THE NORTH AEGEAN IL CRINOIDEA AND HOLOTHURIOIDEA (ECHINODERMATA) Athanasios S. KOUKOURAS and Apostolos I. SINIS Laboratory of Zoology, University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece BENTHOS RÉSUMÉ. - Deux espèces de Crinoïdes et 22 espèces d'Holothurioidea ont été récoltées CRINOÏDES au Nord de la Mer Égée. 7 espèces, Holothuria (H.) stellati, H. (H.) mammata, Paracucuma- HOLOTHURIDES ria hyndmanni, Havelockia inermis, Phyllophorus granulatus, Leptosynapta makrankyra, MÉDITERRANÉE Labidoplax thomsoni sont nouvelles pour la Méditerranée orientale (20° plus à l'est), 3 MER EGÉE espèces, Holothuria (Thymiosycia) impatiens, H. (Platyperona) sanctori, H. (Panningothuria) forskali sont nouvelles pour la Mer Égée, et 5 espèces, le Crinoïde Leptometra phalangium et les Holothurides Holothuria (H.) helleri, Leptopentacta tergestina, Thyone fusus et T. -
Inventory of Annelida Polychaeta in Gulf of Oran (Western Algerian Coastline)
Zoodiversity, 55(4): 307–316, 2021 DOI 10.15407/zoo2021.04.307 UDC 595.142(1-15:65) INVENTORY OF ANNELIDA POLYCHAETA IN GULF OF ORAN (WESTERN ALGERIAN COASTLINE) A. Kerfouf1, A. Baaloudj2*, F. Kies1,3, K. Belhadj Tahar1, F. Denis4 1Laboratory of Eco-development of Spaces, University of Djillali Liabes, Sidi Bel Abbes, 22000, Algeria 2Laboratory of Biology, Water and Environment, University of 8 May 1945, Guelma 24000, Algeria 3Earth and Environmental Sciences Department, Università Degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy 4Marine Biology Station (MNHN), UMR 7208 ‘BOREA’, 29182, Concarneau, France *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected]; baaloudj.aff [email protected] A. Baaloudj (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6932-0905) Inventory of Annelida Polychaeta in Gulf of Oran (Western Algerian Coastline). Kerfouf, A., Baaloudj, A., Kies, F., Belhadj Tahar, K. Denis, F. — Bionomical research on the continental shelf of the Oran‘s Gulf enabled us to study the Annelida macrofauna. Sampling sites were selected according to the bathymetry, which was divided into eight transects. Collected samples with the Aberdeen grab separated the Polychaeta Annelids from other zoological groups. 1571 Annelida Polychaeta were inventoried and determined by the species, including ten orders (Amphinomida, Capitellida, Eunicida, Flabelligerida, Ophelida, Oweniida, Phyllodocidae, Sabellida, Spionida, Terebellidae), 24 families, 84 genus and 74 species. Th e analyzed taxa highlighted the dominant and main species on the bottom of the Gulf, including Hyalinoecia bilineata, which appeared as the major species, Eunice vittata, Chone duneri, Glycera convoluta, Hyalinocea fauveli, Pista cristata, Lumbrinerris fragilis and Chloeia venusta. Key words: Annelida, Polychaeta, continental shelf, Gulf of Oran., macrofauna, Hyalinoecia bilineata. -
Florida Keys Species List
FKNMS Species List A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T 1 Marine and Terrestrial Species of the Florida Keys 2 Phylum Subphylum Class Subclass Order Suborder Infraorder Superfamily Family Scientific Name Common Name Notes 3 1 Porifera (Sponges) Demospongia Dictyoceratida Spongiidae Euryspongia rosea species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 4 2 Fasciospongia cerebriformis species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 5 3 Hippospongia gossypina Velvet sponge 6 4 Hippospongia lachne Sheepswool sponge 7 5 Oligoceras violacea Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 8 6 Spongia barbara Yellow sponge 9 7 Spongia graminea Glove sponge 10 8 Spongia obscura Grass sponge 11 9 Spongia sterea Wire sponge 12 10 Irciniidae Ircinia campana Vase sponge 13 11 Ircinia felix Stinker sponge 14 12 Ircinia cf. Ramosa species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 15 13 Ircinia strobilina Black-ball sponge 16 14 Smenospongia aurea species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey, Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 17 15 Thorecta horridus recorded from Keys by Wiedenmayer 18 16 Dendroceratida Dysideidae Dysidea etheria species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey; Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 19 17 Dysidea fragilis species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey; Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 20 18 Dysidea janiae species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey; Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 21 19 Dysidea variabilis species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 22 20 Verongida Druinellidae Pseudoceratina crassa Branching tube sponge 23 21 Aplysinidae Aplysina archeri species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 24 22 Aplysina cauliformis Row pore rope sponge 25 23 Aplysina fistularis Yellow tube sponge 26 24 Aplysina lacunosa 27 25 Verongula rigida Pitted sponge 28 26 Darwinellidae Aplysilla sulfurea species from G.P. -
Diversity of Animals 355 15 | DIVERSITY of ANIMALS
Concepts of Biology Chapter 15 | Diversity of Animals 355 15 | DIVERSITY OF ANIMALS Figure 15.1 The leaf chameleon (Brookesia micra) was discovered in northern Madagascar in 2012. At just over one inch long, it is the smallest known chameleon. (credit: modification of work by Frank Glaw, et al., PLOS) Chapter Outline 15.1: Features of the Animal Kingdom 15.2: Sponges and Cnidarians 15.3: Flatworms, Nematodes, and Arthropods 15.4: Mollusks and Annelids 15.5: Echinoderms and Chordates 15.6: Vertebrates Introduction While we can easily identify dogs, lizards, fish, spiders, and worms as animals, other animals, such as corals and sponges, might be easily mistaken as plants or some other form of life. Yet scientists have recognized a set of common characteristics shared by all animals, including sponges, jellyfish, sea urchins, and humans. The kingdom Animalia is a group of multicellular Eukarya. Animal evolution began in the ocean over 600 million years ago, with tiny creatures that probably do not resemble any living organism today. Since then, animals have evolved into a highly diverse kingdom. Although over one million currently living species of animals have been identified, scientists are [1] continually discovering more species. The number of described living animal species is estimated to be about 1.4 million, and there may be as many as 6.8 million. Understanding and classifying the variety of living species helps us to better understand how to conserve and benefit from this diversity. The animal classification system characterizes animals based on their anatomy, features of embryological development, and genetic makeup. -
Phylum Porifera
790 Chapter 28 | Invertebrates updated as new information is collected about the organisms of each phylum. 28.1 | Phylum Porifera By the end of this section, you will be able to do the following: • Describe the organizational features of the simplest multicellular organisms • Explain the various body forms and bodily functions of sponges As we have seen, the vast majority of invertebrate animals do not possess a defined bony vertebral endoskeleton, or a bony cranium. However, one of the most ancestral groups of deuterostome invertebrates, the Echinodermata, do produce tiny skeletal “bones” called ossicles that make up a true endoskeleton, or internal skeleton, covered by an epidermis. We will start our investigation with the simplest of all the invertebrates—animals sometimes classified within the clade Parazoa (“beside the animals”). This clade currently includes only the phylum Placozoa (containing a single species, Trichoplax adhaerens), and the phylum Porifera, containing the more familiar sponges (Figure 28.2). The split between the Parazoa and the Eumetazoa (all animal clades above Parazoa) likely took place over a billion years ago. We should reiterate here that the Porifera do not possess “true” tissues that are embryologically homologous to those of all other derived animal groups such as the insects and mammals. This is because they do not create a true gastrula during embryogenesis, and as a result do not produce a true endoderm or ectoderm. But even though they are not considered to have true tissues, they do have specialized cells that perform specific functions like tissues (for example, the external “pinacoderm” of a sponge acts like our epidermis).