DOCSLIB.ORG

Broad-Scale Biotope Mapping of Potential Reefs in the Irish Sea (North-West of Anglesey)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Broad-Scale Biotope Mapping of Potential Reefs in the Irish Sea (North-West of Anglesey) JNCC Report No. 423 Broad-scale biotope mapping of potential reefs in the Irish Sea (north-west of Anglesey) V. Blyth-Skyrme, C. Lindenbaum, E. Verling, K. Van Landeghem, K. Robinson, A. Mackie & T. Darbyshire October 2008 © JNCC, Peterborough 2008 ISSN 0963-8091 For further information please contact: Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House City Road Peterborough Cambridgeshire PE1 1JY Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1733 866905 Fax: +44 (0)1733 555948 Website: www.jncc.gov.uk This report should be cited as: Blyth-Skyrme, V., Lindenbaum, C., Verling, E., Van Landeghem, K., Robinson, K., Mackie, A., Darbyshire, T. 2008. Broad-scale biotope mapping of potential reefs in the Irish Sea (north-west of Anglesey) JNCC Report No. 423 Abbreviations BGS British Geological Survey CCW Countryside Council for Wales JNCC Joint Nature Conservation Committee MI Marine Institute NMW Amgueddfa Cymru - National Museum Wales SAC Special Area of Conservation UCC University College Cork Broad-scale biotope mapping of potential reefs in the Irish Sea (north-west of Anglesey) Contents Executive Summary.................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction.....................................................................................................................3 1.1 Background to study ................................................................................................3 1.2 Background to approaches in seabed habitat mapping............................................5 1.3 Survey Areas............................................................................................................7 1.3.1 Location .......................................................................................................7 1.3.2 Physical environment...................................................................................8 1.3.3 Biology.......................................................................................................10 1.4 Objectives ..............................................................................................................12 2. Methodology ..................................................................................................................14 2.1 Survey strategy and vessel.....................................................................................14 2.2 Navigation..............................................................................................................15 2.3 Acoustic data collection.........................................................................................15 2.3.1 Multibeam..................................................................................................15 2.3.2 Single-beam ...............................................................................................15 2.4 Seabed sampling....................................................................................................15 2.4.1 Selection of sampling stations ...................................................................15 2.4.2 Grab samples..............................................................................................16 2.4.3 Video samples............................................................................................16 2.5 Data processing and analysis .................................................................................18 2.5.1 Multibeam bathymetry and backscatter.....................................................18 2.5.2 Grabs Samples: Particle size analysis........................................................24 2.5.3 Samples: Biology.......................................................................................26 2.5.4 Video..........................................................................................................28 2.6 Data integration and presentation ..........................................................................30 3. Results ............................................................................................................................31 3.1 Multibeam bathymetry and backscatter.................................................................31 3.1.1 Area 1.........................................................................................................31 3.1.2 Area 2.........................................................................................................37 3.1.3 Area 3.........................................................................................................42 3.1.4 Area 4.........................................................................................................47 3.2 Sediment sample analyses......................................................................................52 3.2.1 Relationship between sediment and backscatter........................................57 3.3 Grab samples..........................................................................................................58 3.3.1 Infauna .......................................................................................................58 3.3.2 Infaunal assemblages .................................................................................61 3.3.3 Infaunal biotopes........................................................................................64 3.3.4 Comparison with data collected during the HABMAP project .................64 3.3.5 Epifauna .....................................................................................................68 3.4 Video analysis........................................................................................................70 3.4.1 Epifaunal assemblages...............................................................................70 3.4.2 Epifaunal biotope assignment....................................................................74 3.4.3 Epifaunal biotope descriptions...................................................................75 3.4.4 Epifaunal biotope distribution....................................................................96 3.5 Presence and distribution of Annex I reef habitat................................................100 4. Integrated assessment.................................................................................................107 4.1 Area 1...................................................................................................................107 Broad-scale biotope mapping of potential reefs in the Irish Sea (north-west of Anglesey) 4.2 Area 2...................................................................................................................109 4.3 Area 3...................................................................................................................111 4.4 Area 4...................................................................................................................113 5. Areas of conservation interest....................................................................................116 6. Summary and conclusions..........................................................................................117 6.1 Overview of results..............................................................................................117 6.2 Interpretation of acoustic data..............................................................................117 6.3 Interpretation of biological data...........................................................................117 6.4 Relationship between acoustic and biological data .............................................119 6.5 Identification of Annex I habitats ........................................................................119 6.6 Quality issues with the results..............................................................................120 6.7 General conclusions.............................................................................................121 7. Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................122 8. References....................................................................................................................124 9. Appendices...................................................................................................................129 9.1 Video log sheet ....................................................................................................129 9.2 Results of PSA from Emu....................................................................................130 9.3 Particle Size Analyses – Statistical methods .......................................................136 9.4 SACFOR abundance scale...................................................................................138 9.5 Full PSA sample statistics including laser diffraction results..............................139 9.6 Grab sample data (infauna)..................................................................................143 9.7 List of Biotope Codes used within this project....................................................163 9.8 Grab sample data (epifauna) ................................................................................164 9.9 Video analysis data ..............................................................................................169 Broad-scale biotope mapping of potential reefs in the Irish Sea (north-west of Anglesey) Executive Summary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annelida, Hesionidae), Described As New Based on Morphometry
    Contributions to Zoology, 86 (2) 181-211 (2017) Another brick in the wall: population dynamics of a symbiotic species of Oxydromus (Annelida, Hesionidae), described as new based on morphometry Daniel Martin1,*, Miguel A. Meca1, João Gil1, Pilar Drake2 & Arne Nygren3 1 Centre d’Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB-CSIC) – Carrer d’Accés a la Cala Sant Francesc 14. 17300 Blanes, Girona, Catalunya, Spain 2 Instituto de Ciencias Marinas de Andalucía (ICMAN-CSIC), Avenida República Saharaui 2, Puerto Real 11519, Cádiz, Spain 3 Sjöfartsmuseet Akvariet, Karl Johansgatan 1-3, 41459, Göteborg, Sweden 1 E-mail: [email protected] Key words: Bivalvia, Cádiz Bay, Hesionidae, Iberian Peninsula, NE Atlantic Oxydromus, symbiosis, Tellinidae urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: D97B28C0-4BE9-4C1E-93F8-BD78F994A8D1 Abstract Results ............................................................................................. 186 Oxydromus humesi is an annelid polychaete living as a strict bi- Morphometry ........................................................................... 186 valve endosymbiont (likely parasitic) of Tellina nymphalis in Population size-structure ..................................................... 190 Congolese mangrove swamps and of Scrobicularia plana and Infestation characteristics .................................................... 190 Macomopsis pellucida in Iberian saltmarshes. The Congolese Discussion ....................................................................................... 193 and Iberian polychaete populations were previously
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Tales
    Metabarcoding reveals different zooplankton communities in northern and southern areas of the North Sea Jan Niklas Macher, Berry B. van der Hoorn, Katja T. C. A. Peijnenburg, Lodewijk van Walraven, Willem Renema Supplementary tables 1-5 Table S1: Sampling stations and recorded abiotic variables recorded during the NICO 10 expedition from the Dutch Coast to the Shetland Islands Sampling site name Coordinates (°N, °E) Mean remperature (°C) Mean salinity (PSU) Depth (m) S74 59.416510, 0.499900 8.2 35.1 134 S37 58.1855556, 0.5016667 8.7 35.1 89 S93 57.36046, 0.57784 7.8 34.8 84 S22 56.5866667, 0.6905556 8.3 34.9 220 S109 56.06489, 1.59652 8.7 35 79 S130 55.62157, 2.38651 7.8 34.8 73 S156 54.88581, 3.69192 8.3 34.6 41 S176 54.41489, 4.04154 9.6 34.6 43 S203 53.76851, 4.76715 11.8 34.5 34 Table S2: Species list and read number per sampling site Class Order Family Genus Species S22 S37 S74 S93 S109 S130 S156 S176 S203 Copepoda Calanoida Acartiidae Acartia Acartia clausi 0 0 0 72 0 170 15 630 3995 Copepoda Calanoida Acartiidae Acartia Acartia tonsa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Hydrozoa Trachymedusae Rhopalonematidae Aglantha Aglantha digitale 0 0 0 0 1870 117 420 629 0 Actinopterygii Trachiniformes Ammodytidae Ammodytes Ammodytes marinus 0 0 0 0 0 263 0 35 0 Copepoda Harpacticoida Miraciidae Amphiascopsis Amphiascopsis cinctus 344 0 0 992 2477 2500 9574 8947 0 Ophiuroidea Amphilepidida Amphiuridae Amphiura Amphiura filiformis 0 0 0 0 219 0 0 1470 63233 Copepoda Calanoida Pontellidae Anomalocera Anomalocera patersoni 0 0 586 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bivalvia Venerida
    [Show full text]
  • Onetouch 4.0 Sanned Documents
    Vol. 82, pp. 1-30 29 May, 1969 PROCEEDINGS OF THE BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON REVIEW OF SOME SPECIES REFERRED TO SCALISETOSUS MCINTOSH (POLYCHAETA, POLYNOIDAE) BY MABIAN H. PETTIBONE Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. In connection with an extended review of the polynoid gen- era, based on a study of the type-species, it was foimd that Scalisetosus Mclntosh ( 1885) has been used for a heterogenous group of species. The genus has served to include species with setae as transparent as crystal and the neurosetae character- ized by the presence of a basal semilunar cusp or pocket, al- though this particular feature was not shown on the figure of the neiu-osetae of the type-species, S. ceramensis, by Mclntosh (1885, pi. lOA, fig. 14). Any species equipped with this pe- culiar type of neiu-osetae has been placed in Scalisetosus, re- gardless of other characters. Saint-Joseph (1899) proposed the new genus Adyte for three species {Polynoe pellucida Ehlers, Hermadion assimile Mclntosh, and H. echini Giard) having the peculiar type of neurosetae, separating them from S. cera- mensis, which lacks the basal semilunar cusps. Mclntosh (1900) was responsible for changing the diagnosis of Scali- setosus to include the species referred to Adyte by Saint- Joseph, Subsequently, Adyte was abandoned and was synony- mized with Scalisetosus by Fauvel (1914, p. 47). During a visit to the British Museum of Natural History in May 1967, I was able to examine the unique type of Scalise- tosus ceramensis and to verify that the neurosetae indeed do lack the basal semilunar cusps and that the species therefore lacks one of the key characters that has been attributed to the genus.
    [Show full text]
  • (Polychaeta) from the CANARY ISLANDS
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 48(2): l8D-188, 1991 POL YNOIDAE (pOLYCHAETA) FROM THE CANARY ISLANDS M. C. Brito, J. Nunez and J. J. Bacallado ABSTRACT This paper is a contribution to the study of the family Polynoidae (Polychaeta) from the Canary Islands. The material examined has been collected by the authors from 1975 to 1989. A total of 18 species was found belonging to 8 genera: Gesiel/a (I), Po/ynoe (1), Adyte (I), Subadyte (I), Harrnothoe (11), A/entia (1), Lepidasthenia (1) and Lepidonotus (I). Ten species are new to this fauna and one, Harrnothoe cascabullico/a, is new to science. Furthermore, the genera Po/ynoe, Adyte and Lepidasthenia are recorded for the first time in the Canary Islands. The Polychaeta of the Canary Islands are enumerated in the provisional cata- logue of Nunez et al. (1984), in which are recorded 148 species, 12 of which belong to the family Polynoidae. Samples from the Canary coastline were examined and members ofPolynoidae studied. A total of 173 specimens was studied, belonging to 7 subfamilies, 8 genera, and 18 species, of which 9 species are recorded for the first time in the Canarian fauna. Worthy of note is the large number of species belonging to the genus Harmothoe (11), one of which, H. cascabullicola is new. METHODS The material examined was collected from 1975 to 1989, from 61 stations, at 45 localities on the Canary coasts (Fig. I). The list of stations, with their localities, types of substrate and collecting data are listed in Table I. The methods used in collecting depended on the type of substrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Reference Module Summary Report LR22
    Laboratory Reference Module Summary Report Benthic Invertebrate Component - 2017/18 LR22 26 March 2018 Author: Tim Worsfold Reviewer: David Hall, NMBAQCS Project Manager Approved by: Myles O'Reilly, Contract Manager, SEPA Contact: [email protected] MODULE / EXERCISE DETAILS Module: Laboratory Reference (LR) Exercises: LR22 Data/Sample Request Circulated: 10th July 2017 Sample Submission Deadline: 31st August 2017 Number of Subscribing Laboratories: 7 Number of LR Received: 4 Contents Table 1. Summary of mis-identified taxa in the Laboratory Reference module (LR22) (erroneous identifications in brackets). Table 2. Summary of identification policy differences in the Laboratory Reference Module (LR22) (original identifications in brackets). Appendix. LR22 individual summary reports for participating laboratories. Table 1. Summary of mis-identified taxa in the Laboratory Reference Module (LR22) (erroneous identifications in brackets). Taxonomic Major Taxonomic Group LabCode Edits Polychaeta Oligochaeta Crustacea Mollusca Other Spio symphyta (Spio filicornis ) - Leucothoe procera (Leucothoe ?richardii ) - - Scolelepis bonnieri (Scolelepis squamata ) - - - - BI_2402 5 Laonice (Laonice sarsi ) - - - - Dipolydora (Dipolydora flava ) - - - - Goniada emerita (Goniadella bobrezkii ) - Nebalia reboredae (Nebalia bipes ) - - Polydora sp. A (Polydora cornuta ) - Diastylis rathkei (Diastylis cornuta ) - - BI_2403 7 Syllides? (Anoplosyllis edentula ) - Abludomelita obtusata (Tryphosa nana ) - in mixture - - Spirorbinae (Ditrupa arietina ) - - - -
    [Show full text]
  • A Bioturbation Classification of European Marine Infaunal
    A bioturbation classification of European marine infaunal invertebrates Ana M. Queiros 1, Silvana N. R. Birchenough2, Julie Bremner2, Jasmin A. Godbold3, Ruth E. Parker2, Alicia Romero-Ramirez4, Henning Reiss5,6, Martin Solan3, Paul J. Somerfield1, Carl Van Colen7, Gert Van Hoey8 & Stephen Widdicombe1 1Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, U.K. 2The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33 OHT, U.K. 3Department of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, U.K. 4EPOC – UMR5805, Universite Bordeaux 1- CNRS, Station Marine d’Arcachon, 2 Rue du Professeur Jolyet, Arcachon 33120, France 5Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, University of Nordland, Postboks 1490, Bodø 8049, Norway 6Department for Marine Research, Senckenberg Gesellschaft fu¨ r Naturforschung, Su¨ dstrand 40, Wilhelmshaven 26382, Germany 7Marine Biology Research Group, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281/S8, Ghent 9000, Belgium 8Bio-Environmental Research Group, Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research (ILVO-Fisheries), Ankerstraat 1, Ostend 8400, Belgium Keywords Abstract Biodiversity, biogeochemical, ecosystem function, functional group, good Bioturbation, the biogenic modification of sediments through particle rework- environmental status, Marine Strategy ing and burrow ventilation, is a key mediator of many important geochemical Framework Directive, process, trait. processes in marine systems. In situ quantification of bioturbation can be achieved in a myriad of ways, requiring expert knowledge, technology, and Correspondence resources not always available, and not feasible in some settings. Where dedi- Ana M. Queiros, Plymouth Marine cated research programmes do not exist, a practical alternative is the adoption Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 2.4MB .Pdf File
    Memoirs of Museum Victoria 71: 217–236 (2014) Published December 2014 ISSN 1447-2546 (Print) 1447-2554 (On-line) http://museumvictoria.com.au/about/books-and-journals/journals/memoirs-of-museum-victoria/ Original specimens and type localities of early described polychaete species (Annelida) from Norway, with particular attention to species described by O.F. Müller and M. Sars EIVIND OUG1,* (http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:EF42540F-7A9E-486F-96B7-FCE9F94DC54A), TORKILD BAKKEN2 (http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:FA79392C-048E-4421-BFF8-71A7D58A54C7) AND JON ANDERS KONGSRUD3 (http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:4AF3F49E-9406-4387-B282-73FA5982029E) 1 Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Region South, Jon Lilletuns vei 3, NO-4879 Grimstad, Norway ([email protected]) 2 Norwegian University of Science and Technology, University Museum, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway ([email protected]) 3 University Museum of Bergen, University of Bergen, PO Box 7800, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway ([email protected]) * To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Oug, E., Bakken, T. and Kongsrud, J.A. 2014. Original specimens and type localities of early described polychaete species (Annelida) from Norway, with particular attention to species described by O.F. Müller and M. Sars. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 71: 217–236. Early descriptions of species from Norwegian waters are reviewed, with a focus on the basic requirements for re- assessing their characteristics, in particular, by clarifying the status of the original material and locating sampling sites. A large number of polychaete species from the North Atlantic were described in the early period of zoological studies in the 18th and 19th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • For Cage Aquaculture
    Strengthening and supporting further development of aquaculture in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia PROJECT UTF/SAU/048/SAU Guidelines on Environmental Monitoring for Cage Aquaculture within the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Cover photograph: Aerial view of the floating cage farm of Tharawat Sea Company, Medina Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (courtesy Nikos Keferakis) Guidelines on environmental monitoring for cage aquaculture within the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia RICHARD ANTHONY CORNER FAO Consultant The Technical Cooperation and Partnership between the Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), or of the Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specic companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO, or the Ministry in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reect the views or policies of FAO, or the Ministry. ISBN 978-92-5-109651-2 (FAO) © FAO, 2017 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product.
    [Show full text]
  • Marlin Marine Information Network Information on the Species and Habitats Around the Coasts and Sea of the British Isles
    MarLIN Marine Information Network Information on the species and habitats around the coasts and sea of the British Isles Edible sea urchin (Echinus esculentus) MarLIN – Marine Life Information Network Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Review Dr Harvey Tyler-Walters 2008-04-29 A report from: The Marine Life Information Network, Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Please note. This MarESA report is a dated version of the online review. Please refer to the website for the most up-to-date version [https://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1311]. All terms and the MarESA methodology are outlined on the website (https://www.marlin.ac.uk) This review can be cited as: Tyler-Walters, H., 2008. Echinus esculentus Edible sea urchin. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.17031/marlinsp.1311.1 The information (TEXT ONLY) provided by the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Note that images and other media featured on this page are each governed by their own terms and conditions and they may or may not be available for reuse. Permissions beyond the scope of this license are available here. Based on a work at www.marlin.ac.uk (page left blank) Date: 2008-04-29 Edible sea urchin (Echinus esculentus) - Marine Life Information Network See online review for distribution map Echinus esculentus and hermit crabs on grazed rock.
    [Show full text]
  • 10Th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling, University of Melbourne, February 1999
    10th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling, University of Melbourne, February 1999 Additional Papers John A Lewis (Editor) Maritime Platforms Division Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory DSTO-GD-0287 ABSTRACT This volume contains nineteen papers from the 10th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling, held at the University of Melbourne in Melbourne, Australia, in February 1999. The scope of the congress was to enhance scientific understanding of the processes and prevention of chemical and biological degradation of materials in the sea. Papers in this volume range across the themes of marine biofilms and bioadhesion, macrofouling processes and effects, methods for prevention of marine fouling, biocides in the marine environment, biodeterioration of wood in the sea, and marine corrosion. RELEASE LIMITATION Approved for public release Published by DSTO Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory 506 Lorimer St Fishermans Bend, Victoria 3207 Australia Telephone: (03) 9626 7000 Fax: (03) 9626 7999 © Commonwealth of Australia 2001 AR-011-880 May 2001 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 10th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling, University of Melbourne, February 1999 Additional Papers Executive Summary The fouling and corrosion of vessels and structures immersed in the sea continues to pose significant economic and operational costs to the owner. Fouling growth can interfere with the operation of submerged equipment, impose increased loading stresses and accelerate corrosion on marine structures, and adversely affect the performance of ships by increasing hydrodynamic drag, which necessitates the use of more power and fuel to move the ship through the water. Similarly, marine corrosion and biodegradation of materials can compromise the operation and structural integrity of vessels, structures and other immersed equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Version
    MarLIN Marine Information Network Information on the species and habitats around the coasts and sea of the British Isles Foliose red seaweeds with dense Dictyota dichotoma and/or Dictyopteris membranacea on exposed lower infralittoral rock MarLIN – Marine Life Information Network Marine Evidence–based Sensitivity Assessment (MarESA) Review Dr Heidi Tillin 2018-03-13 A report from: The Marine Life Information Network, Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Please note. This MarESA report is a dated version of the online review. Please refer to the website for the most up-to-date version [https://www.marlin.ac.uk/habitats/detail/2]. All terms and the MarESA methodology are outlined on the website (https://www.marlin.ac.uk) This review can be cited as: Tillin, H.M. 2018. Foliose red seaweeds with dense [Dictyota dichotoma] and/or [Dictyopteris membranacea] on exposed lower infralittoral rock. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.17031/marlinhab.2.1 The information (TEXT ONLY) provided by the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Note that images and other media featured on this page are each governed by their own terms and conditions and they may or may not be available for reuse. Permissions beyond the scope of this license are available
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Annelida Polychaeta in Gulf of Oran (Western Algerian Coastline)
    Zoodiversity, 55(4): 307–316, 2021 DOI 10.15407/zoo2021.04.307 UDC 595.142(1-15:65) INVENTORY OF ANNELIDA POLYCHAETA IN GULF OF ORAN (WESTERN ALGERIAN COASTLINE) A. Kerfouf1, A. Baaloudj2*, F. Kies1,3, K. Belhadj Tahar1, F. Denis4 1Laboratory of Eco-development of Spaces, University of Djillali Liabes, Sidi Bel Abbes, 22000, Algeria 2Laboratory of Biology, Water and Environment, University of 8 May 1945, Guelma 24000, Algeria 3Earth and Environmental Sciences Department, Università Degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy 4Marine Biology Station (MNHN), UMR 7208 ‘BOREA’, 29182, Concarneau, France *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected]; baaloudj.aff [email protected] A. Baaloudj (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6932-0905) Inventory of Annelida Polychaeta in Gulf of Oran (Western Algerian Coastline). Kerfouf, A., Baaloudj, A., Kies, F., Belhadj Tahar, K. Denis, F. — Bionomical research on the continental shelf of the Oran‘s Gulf enabled us to study the Annelida macrofauna. Sampling sites were selected according to the bathymetry, which was divided into eight transects. Collected samples with the Aberdeen grab separated the Polychaeta Annelids from other zoological groups. 1571 Annelida Polychaeta were inventoried and determined by the species, including ten orders (Amphinomida, Capitellida, Eunicida, Flabelligerida, Ophelida, Oweniida, Phyllodocidae, Sabellida, Spionida, Terebellidae), 24 families, 84 genus and 74 species. Th e analyzed taxa highlighted the dominant and main species on the bottom of the Gulf, including Hyalinoecia bilineata, which appeared as the major species, Eunice vittata, Chone duneri, Glycera convoluta, Hyalinocea fauveli, Pista cristata, Lumbrinerris fragilis and Chloeia venusta. Key words: Annelida, Polychaeta, continental shelf, Gulf of Oran., macrofauna, Hyalinoecia bilineata.
    [Show full text]