Skippers-Brochure.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Before the Hearings Panel for the Queenstown Lakes Proposed District Plan
BEFORE THE HEARINGS PANEL FOR THE QUEENSTOWN LAKES PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER Minute Concerning the National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity SUPPLEMENTARY MEMORANDUM OF COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL REGARDING THE NATIONAL POLICY STATEMENT ON URBAN DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY 19 April 2017 Barristers & Solicitors S J Scott Telephone: +64-3-968 4018 Facsimile: +64-3-379 5023 Email: [email protected] PO Box 874 SOLICITORS CHRISTCHURCH 8140 MAY IT PLEASE THE PANEL: 1. This supplementary memorandum is filed on behalf of the Queenstown Lakes District Council (Council) to respond to a question from the Hearing Panel (Panel) asked during Hearing Stream 10. 2. The Panel asked the Council to confirm where Arrowtown and other towns sit in relation to the definition of 'urban environment' in the National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity 2016 (NPSUDC or NPS). Specifically, the Panel asked whether those towns form part of the Queenstown or Wanaka 'urban environments'. This question relates to paragraphs 23 and 24 of the Council's Memorandum of Counsel dated 3 March 2017 (March Memorandum), where it is stated that although there is some uncertainty as to what parts of the District are an 'urban environment' in their own right, it is accepted that Queenstown itself is a 'high growth urban area' and therefore the NPS applies to the District as a whole. The March Memorandum then states that the NPS provisions apply in tiers and differentiates between the parts of the NPS that refer to urban environments, urban environments expected to experience growth, and medium and high- growth urban areas. -
Tomasi SHA, Arthurs Point Transport Assessment
19 October 2017 Bullendale Developments Limited C/- Momentum Projects By email Attention: Shane Fairmaid Dear Shane, Tomasi SHA, Arthurs Point Transport Assessment The purpose of this letter is to provide a high level transport assessment for a proposed Tomasi Special Housing Area (SHA) to be created at Arthurs Point, Queenstown. The assessment will consider if there is additional capacity within the existing transport infrastructure to accommodate the proposed development. 1 Background The proposed SHA, Tomasi, is an extension of Bullendale at 157 Arthurs Point Road. The Tomasi development is to be located within Lot 2 DP12913 and will be accessed through the Bullendale Subdivision which is a SHA created under consent approval SH160143. Bullendale is not fully constructed although design drawings have been approved for the access from Arthurs Point Road. This high level transport assessment utilises the detailed design for Bullendale as well as traffic modelling and analysis undertaken during the consent stage. 2 Existing Transport Network For the purposes of this assessment it is assumed that the existing transport network will include infrastructure which has been consented and is being constructed within the Bullendale subdivision, refer SH160143. Bullendale will establish a new residential access road, Bullendale Drive, which will be formed as a Suburban Local Road1. This road will have a 5.5m movement lane with separate footpaths and indented on-street parking. This road type can serve up to 200 residential dwellings. Bullendale Drive is consented to serve 88 residential dwellings within at Bullendale. Bullendale Drive is to be accessed from Arthurs Point Road. This intersection has been consented and the detailed design has engineering approval. -
Otago Conservancy
A Directory of Wetlands in New Zealand OTAGO CONSERVANCY Sutton Salt Lake (67) Location: 45o34'S, 170o05'E. 2.7 km from Sutton and 8 km from Middlemarch, Straith-Tari area, Otago Region, South Island. Area: 3.7 ha. Altitude: 250 m. Overview: Sutton Salt Lake is a valuable example of an inland or athalassic saline lake, with a considerable variety of saline habitats around its margin and in adjacent slightly saline boggy depressions. The lake is situated in one of the few areas in New Zealand where conditions favour saline lakes (i.e. where precipitation is lower than evaporation). An endemic aquatic animal, Ephydrella novaezealandiae, is present, and there is an interesting pattern of vegetation zonation. Physical features: Sutton Salt Lake is a natural, inland or athalassic saline lake with an average depth of 30 cm and a salinity of 15%. The lake has no known inflow or outflow. The soils are saline and alkaline at the lake margin (sodium-saturated clays), and surrounded by yellow-grey earths and dry subdygrous Matarae. The parent material is loess. Shallow boggy depressions exist near the lake, and there is a narrow fringe of salt tolerant vegetation at the lake margin. Algal communities are present, and often submerged by lake water. The average annual rainfall is about 480 mm, while annual evaporation is about 710 mm. Ecological features: Sutton Salt Lake is one of only five examples of inland saline habitats of botanical value in Central Otago. This is the only area in New Zealand which is suitable for the existence of this habitat, since in general rainfall is high, evaporation is low, and endorheic drainage systems are absent. -
Queenstown Lakes District Plan Review, Chapter 26: Historic Heritage
DISTRICT PLAN REVIEW CHAPTER 26: HISTORIC HERITAGE SUBMISSION TO THE QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL 23 OCTOBER 2015 1. BACKGROUND TO IPENZ The Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand (IPENZ) is the lead national professional body representing the engineering profession in New Zealand. It has approximately 16,000 Members, and includes a cross-section of engineering students, practising engineers, and senior Members in positions of responsibility in business. IPENZ is non-aligned and seeks to contribute to the community in matters of national interest giving a learned view on important issues, independent of any commercial interest. As the lead engineering organisation in New Zealand, IPENZ has responsibility for advocating for the protection and conservation of New Zealand’s engineering heritage. IPENZ manages a Heritage Register and a Heritage Record for engineering items throughout New Zealand. The IPENZ Engineering Heritage Register has criteria and thresholds similar to Category 1 historic places on Heritage New Zealand’s New Zealand Heritage List/Rārangi Kōrero. Items on our Register have been assessed as being engineering achievements of outstanding or special heritage significance. IPENZ is still populating the Register. The IPENZ Engineering Heritage Record includes histories of industrial and engineering items around New Zealand, and is also subject to ongoing improvements and additions. 2. GENERAL COMMENTS 2.1 INTRODUCTION The scheduling of heritage places in the District Plans of local authorities is an important mechanism that IPENZ supports because of our objective of promoting the protection, preservation and conservation of New Zealand’s engineering heritage. The Queenstown Lakes District has a very rich heritage and in particular has a wealth of industrial and engineering heritages sites because of the area’s early mining, agricultural and pastoral history and its challenging topography. -
Waste for Otago (The Omnibus Plan Change)
Key Issues Report Plan Change 8 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago and Plan Change 1 to the Regional Plan: Waste for Otago (The Omnibus Plan Change) Appendices Appendix A: Minster’s direction matter to be called in to the environment court Appendix B: Letter from EPA commissioning the report Appendix C: Minister’s letter in response to the Skelton report Appendix D: Skelton report Appendix E: ORC’s letter in responding to the Minister with work programme Appendix F: Relevant sections of the Regional Plan: Water for Otago Appendix G: Relevant sections of the Regional Plan: Waste for Otago Appendix H: Relevant provisions of the Resource Management Act 1991 Appendix I: National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020 Appendix J: Relevant provisions of the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater 2020 Appendix K: Relevant provisions of the Resource Management (Stock Exclusion) Regulations 2020 Appendix L: Relevant provisions of Otago Regional Council Plans and Regional Policy Statements Appendix M: Relevant provisions of Iwi management plans APPENDIX A Ministerial direction to refer the Otago Regional Council’s proposed Omnibus Plan Change to its Regional Plans to the Environment Court Having had regard to all the relevant factors, I consider that the matters requested to be called in by Otago Regional Council (ORC), being the proposed Omnibus Plan Change (comprised of Water Plan Change 8 – Discharge Management, and Waste Plan Change 1 – Dust Suppressants and Landfills) to its relevant regional plans are part of a proposal of national significance. Under section 142(2) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA), I direct those matters to be referred to the Environment Court for decision. -
Queenstown at a Glance
QUEENSTOWN AT A GLANCE LOCATION Nestled in the Southern Alps of New Zealand on the shores of Lake Wakatipu, Queenstown is the premier four season lake and alpine resort in the Southern Hemisphere and is rated as one of the world's top destinations. It is situated 310m (1,017ft) above sea level at latitude 45 degrees south and longitude 169 degrees west. CLIMATE A popular holiday spot at any time of the year, Queenstown is renowned for its four distinctive seasons. The alpine climate means winter brings crisp, clear blue-sky days amongst snow-capped mountains, spring retains the snow but blooms into longer, warmer days, summer offers hot days averaging 26ºC and long twilights, and autumn’s brilliant red and gold colours are a special feature across the region. Summer: Hot and dry, daytime high 18-30ºC, nights generally cool Autumn: Clear warm days, daytime 12-25ºC, nights cool to cold Winter: Crisp clear days, daytime 5-10ºC, nights cold Spring: Crisp morning and evening, 9-20ºC, nights cool Annual rainfall: 913mm (36 inches) Average annual snowfall: It snows down to lake level (downtown) on average about 3 times in winter Coronet Peak 2.03m (about 6.5ft) per annum The Remarkables 3.67m (about 12ft) per annum Cardrona 2.7m (about 8.9ft) per annum POPULATION According to New Zealand’s last census in 2006, Queenstown and its surrounds of Arrowtown, Glenorchy and Kingston are home to a permanent population of approximately 17,000. (Note: the 2011 census was postponed) At the height of the summer and winter visitors can outnumber locals by as many as 3 to 1 VISITOR NUMBERS Queenstown hosts around 2 million visitors a year – 48% international and 52% domestic Queenstown’s peak seasons are late December to March and the months of July and August HOW TO GET HERE Air Queenstown has an international airport located a 10-minute drive from the town centre. -
Item Report Template
IPENZ Engineering Heritage Record Report Shotover River Bridge, Lower Shotover Written by: Rebecca Ford and Karen Astwood Date: 15 February 2016 Bridge over the Shotover River in the Lower Shotover area, 1926. Godber, Albert Percy, 1875–1949: Collection of albums, prints and negatives. Ref: APG-1683-1/2-G. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. http://natlib.govt.nz/records/22806436 1 Contents A. General information ....................................................................................................... 3 B. Description .................................................................................................................... 5 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 5 Historical narrative ................................................................................................................ 5 Social narrative .................................................................................................................. 11 Physical narrative ............................................................................................................... 14 C. Assessment of significance .......................................................................................... 17 D. Supporting information .................................................................................................. 18 List of supporting documents............................................................................................... -
Kjet-Product-Manual-LR.Pdf
OUR HERITAGE KJET, BORN SUMMER 1960 The world’s first commercial Jet boating operation, KJet has its origins in a Christian youth trust set up to ensure the “spiritual, moral and physical wellbeing of the young people in Otago and Southland.” The early Jet boat industry was inextricably linked with the Lakeland Christian Camp in CONTENTS 1960 when camp trustees and Invercargill brothers Alan and Harold Melhop made the first powered navigation of the Kawarau Falls dam in a Hamilton Jet. Holidaymakers soon lined up for rides on the thrilling new boat, and at five shillings a go, the trip provided efficient ONE HOUR TRIP 5 fundraising for the Christian camp. So began one of Queenstown’s most successful and MAPS + IMAGES 6 enduring tourist operations. FAMILY TRIP 7 The KJet service moved operations from the Frankton Jetty near the Frankton Campground to the Queenstown Main Town Pier at the urging of the then borough council, which was AIRPORT TRANSFER 8 keen to benefit from the increasingly popular tourism operation. Soon after, the Shotover Extension was added providing a true safari from the Queenstown Main Town Pier, down DOWNTOWN DUO 9 the Kawarau and up the Shotover, through the canyons and under the Edith Cavell Bridge WINE SAMPLER 10 as far as the Oxenbridge Tunnel. The boats often grounded in the shallow braids of the lower Shotover River and in 1964 a separate Shotover Jet service was launched avoiding HIGH FLYER 11 the challenging shallow waters. That trip started at the Edith Cavell Bridge and travelled TWIN THRILLER 12 down to Tucker Beach and back. -
Queenstown Integrated Transport Programme Business Case
Approval ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Revision status* .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Template version................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Supporting documents .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Glossary of terms .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 2. PROGRAMME CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................................... 13 3. PARTNERS AND KEY STAKEHOLDERS .............................................................................................................. 40 4. STRATEGIC ASSESSMENTS – OUTLINING THE NEED FOR INVESTMENT ..................................................... 44 5. ALIGNMENT TO EXISTING STRATEGIES/ORGANISATIONAL GOALS -
2006 Wastewater
CAPITAL PROJECTS Figures Effective as at 1 July 2006 WASTEWATER CAPEX DESCRIPTION CAPEX Value 2006 CAPEX Value Expenditure ID Contributing Area Asset Type/Location Problem Description/Location Problem Resolution ($) Adjusted ($) Date Reticulation, Treatment and Storage 1 1. Queenstown 2 3 4 Sunshine Bay 5 Queenstown Sunshine Bay PS Upgrade pumps (2x18.5kW) 83,702 87,217 2007 6 Queenstown Sunshine Bay PS Generator Generator (54 kVA) 60,078 62,601 2007 7 8 Lake Esplanade to Marine Parade PS 9 Queenstown Preliminary Design To incorporate the Sunshine Bay PS upgrade and associated reticulation upgrades through to the Loaded Hog (start of CBD Ringmain). 100,000 100,000 2006 10 Queenstown Whitbourn Pl to Aspen Grove Trunkmain 120511 to 122460 Upgrade from 150mm to 200mm 165,160 172,097 2007 11 Queenstown Sainsbury Rd to Lake Esplanade Trunkmain 122471 to 127607 Upgrade from 225mm to 375mm 220,790 230,063 2007 12 Queenstown Lake Esplanade to YHA Trunkmain 127608 to 127613 Upgrade from 300mm to 375mm 286,730 298,773 2007 13 Queenstown YHA to Rydges Trunkmain 127615 to 122713 Upgrade from 300mm to 450mm 90,180 93,968 2007 14 Queenstown Rydges to Brunswick Street Trunkmain 122711 to 120204 Upgrade from 300mm to 500mm 317,990 331,346 2007 15 Queenstown Brunswick Street to Loaded Hog Trunkmain 120205 to 300674 Upgrade from 375mm to 500mm 238,380 248,392 2007 16 17 Thompson Street to Lake Esplanade 18 Queenstown Thompson St to Lake Esplanade Trunkmain 300668 to 300669 Upgrade from 150mm to 200mm 33,350 34,751 2007 19 20 Post Office Relocation 21 Queenstown -
The Queenstown Courier SPRING 2013 ISSUE No
The Queenstown Courier SPRING 2013 ISSUE No. 90 THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE QUEENSTOWN & DISTRICT HISTORICAL SOCIETY CONTENTS Page 3: Pioneer Teachers of the Wakatipu: The Sangster Family by Danny Knudson Page 14: Wakatipu Post Offices 150 Years Ago by Alan Cooke Page 19: Elizabeth Meldrum–Grant–Hansen 1852-1927 by Rosslyn Munro Page 22: John Augustus Miller, Goldminer and Journalist, 1833-1903 by Marion Borrell Page 25: Historical Cuttings: Miner‟s Lettuce, Claytonia perfoliata by Rita L. Teele Page 26: Background to the 2014 Calendar: January: Parade in Queenstown, 1901 by Joan and Alan Cooke February: Frankton Airfield, early 1930s by Jules Tapper March: Kinloch Accommodation and Wharf, 1880 by Neville Bryant April: Buckingham St, Arrowtown, 1902 by Denise Heckler May: High St, Macetown, 1897 by Danny Knudson June: Laurel Bank Guest House, Queenstown by Marion Borrell Page 35: Society News: President‟s Annual Report 2013 by Marion Borrell Programme of Activities for Members, August 2013 – May 2014 Annual Financial Statement from Gavin Jack, Treasurer People and Post Offices Our cover picture makes the link between Alan Cooke‟s article on early post offices in the district and other articles about people for whom the post offices were particularly significant: John Augustus Miller, who was the local correspondent for the Otago Witness, Otago Daily Times and other newspapers from 1868 to 1903. Janet Sangster who was the postmistress as well as the teacher at Macetown from 1890-91 where the tiny post office played a part in her courtship. Cover: Thanks to the Lakes District Museum (LDM) for use of the historic pages and the photo of J.A.Miller; and to Nancy Croad, family historian, for the photo of Janet Sangster. -
Executive Summary | Ten Year Plan Submissions 2018-2028
Attachment D EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | TEN YEAR PLAN SUBMISSIONS 2018-2028 SUBMISSIONS BY WARD Arrowtown 13 Glenorchy 6 SUBMISSIONS Hawea 22 GRAND TOTAL Kingston 32 586 Luggate 4 Makarora 2 No Specific Ward 92 Queenstown Area 160 Wanaka Area 255 Question Responses Support Neutral Oppose 1A: Do you support the preferred option to complete the programme 35.04% 39.13% 25.83% outlined in the draft plan? QUEENSTOWN TOWN CENTRE MASTERPLAN 1B: Do you agree with the preferred funding model? 36.53% 36.27% 27.20% (FUNDING OPTIONS AND DELIVERY) 1C: If the funding assumptions are not supported (NZTA) do you agree 57.33% 31.36% 11.31% that Council re-prioritise some projects? 2A: Do you support the funding for a Council Office? 31.91% 37.19% 30.90% PROJECT CONNECT AND LIBRARIES 2B: Do you agree that this should include an interim dedicated 37.34% 38.36% 24.30% Queenstown library space? WANAKA 3A: Do you support the development of a Wanaka Masterplan in 2018 to enable 64.63% 27.32% 8.05% MASTERPLAN a strategic and well connected approach to Wanaka planning? 4A: Do you agree with the water supply project programme and timing to meet WATER (SUPPLY 56.22% 24.63% 19.15% AND QUALITY) the Drinking Water Standard (2008) by 2027/28? 5A: Do you agree that Council should introduce a general subsidy in order to protect 62.31% 23.37% 14.32% FUNDING SMALL the environment by supplementing the cost of smaller community schemes? COMMUNITIES’ WATER NEEDS 5B: Do you support the application of a tier two charge to the Arthurs Point (FUNDING OPTIONS) 36.34% 54.38% 9.28% Scheme