Special Housing Areas Increasing Housing Supply & Partnering with Govt

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Special Housing Areas Increasing Housing Supply & Partnering with Govt Special Housing Areas Increasing Housing Supply & Partnering with Govt Anita Vanstone – Policy & Performance Manager, QLDC Housing Availability • QLDC is currently the most expensive place in NZ to buy or rent 2 Quality of Life Results 3 Housing Sufficiency 4 Constraints • 97% of our District is Outstanding Natural Landscape • High construction costs • Have significant capacity in existing zones but there are significant shortfalls in the housing market in the lower price band dwellings, which is expected to increase • Significant constraints to development of some sites (geotechnical issues, natural hazards, infrastructure etc) The HASHAA Housing Accords and Special Housing Area Act 2013 The purpose of the HASHAA is: To enhance housing affordability by facilitating an increase in land and housing supply in certain regions or districts [which includes Queenstown Lakes] identified as having housing supply and affordability issues. The Amendment Act came into effect on the 16 September 2016. This increased the deadline for establishing SHAs to the 16 September 2019. The Housing Accord • Collaboration between the Council and Government which was signed on 23 October 2014. • Updated Accord signed 12 July 2017. • Key change is that the Accord relates to the entire District as opposed to a focus on the Wakatipu Basin. • Sets targets that Council is required to monitor. The QLDC Lead Policy • Original Lead Policy approved on the 30 October 2014 • Viewed as a live document. Last updated 26 October 2017 • Key elements of the Lead Policy include: Relates to the entire Queenstown Lakes District; Criterion for processing an Expression of Interest; 10% requirement to the Queenstown Lakes District Housing Trust; Community Feedback, Quality of residential development, Infrastructure requirements and timely development; Deeds of Agreement (infrastructure/affordable housing); and Criterion for recommending a Proposal as an SHA to Govt. Council will only recommend a proposed SHA to the Govt once agreement has been reached for the provision of infrastructure – mainly at the sole cost of the developer SHAs will deliver…… Special Housing Area Approved Residential Densities Stage of Development Bridesdale 134 (excluding two existing Largely developed dwellings) Arthurs Point 88 residential units Currently being developed Onslow Road 21 residential units Currently being developed Queenstown Country Club 346 (+ an aged bed care facility) Currently being developed Arrowtown Retirement Village 195 (+ an aged bed care facility) Currently being developed Shotover Country 101 residential units Subdivision nearly completed Bullendale 90 residential units Resource consent due to be submitted Total residential units 975 SHAs being considered by the Minister Bright Sky – Wanaka 281 Hawea 400 Total 681 • SHAs are delivering approximately 1,656 residential units • Approximately 5 potential SHAs still to be considered by Council that could provide an additional 1,000 to 2,500 residential units………BUT time is running out. Queenstown Country Club SHA Ladies Mile • Ladies Mile (Queenstown) up to approx. 1,000 due to capacity issues with Shotover Bridge. • Part of the Housing and Infrastructure fund • Must be consistent with Ladies Mile Master plan • SHA proposals likely to be submitted with approx. 450 to 500 house / land packages Under consideration - Laurel Hills • Approx. 156 residential units • State highway setback, neighbourhood reserve, future connections & 10% contribution to the Housing Trust Community Benefits • Approx. $7 million contribution to the Housing Trust (land, house/land packages or $) • Dementia care unit • Trails/walkways/connections • Infrastructure Improvements and future proofing • Increased supply of housing to the market • Increased housing options for the elderly Summary • Affordability measures promoted including range of section sizes, mixture of typologies, methods to reduce speculation and methods to retain affordability • Restriction on commercial visitor accommodation • 10% must be provided to the Trust to use in Secure Home / Rent Saver products • Must be developed in a timely manner • All secured through a Deed with the landowner.
Recommended publications
  • Evidence of Gregory William Hunt in Support of the Submission of Gibbston Valley Station Limited
    BEFORE THE HEARINGS PANEL FOR THE QUEENSTOWN LAKES PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN UNDER THE Resource Management Act 1991 (“Act”) IN THE MATTER OF Stage 3b Proposed District Plan – Rural Visitor Zone BETWEEN GIBBSTON VALLEY STATION LIMITED Submitter #31037 AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Planning AuthoritY EVIDENCE OF GREGORY WILLIAM HUNT IN SUPPORT OF THE SUBMISSION OF GIBBSTON VALLEY STATION LIMITED 29 MAY 2020 Counsel instructed: J D K Gardner-Hopkins Phone: 04 889 2776 [email protected] PO Box 25-160 WELLINGTON 1 INTRODUCTION Role / position 1. My full name is Gregory William Hunt. 2. I am the CEO and one of two directors of Gibbston Valley Station ("GVS"). 3. I am authorised to provide this evidence on behalf of GVS in support of GVS' application for rezoning of certain of its land to Rural Visitor Zone (“RVS”). 4. While I am giving evidence on behalf of GVS in my capacity as CEO and a director I have a background in Landscape Architecture, and development as summarised below. Landscape Architecture 5. I obtained a Bachelor of Science (BSc), Landscape Architecture and Planning, from the California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. I am a licensed Landscape Architect in California. 6. Prior to relocating to New Zealand, I had I had eight years’ experience as a Landscape Architect in the United States. Development experience 7. My development experience includes: (a) From 1993 to 2000, I was the General Manager of Development, and Landscape Architect for Millbrook Resort, Queenstown. (b) From 2001 to 2006 I was the General Manager at InfinitY Investment Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Value Report Arrow and Cardrona
    CULTURAL VALUES REPORT Arrow River / Wakatipu Basin Aquifers Cardrona River Intellectual Property Rights This report has been prepared for Otago Regional Council on behalf of Te Rūnanga o Moeraki, Kāti Huirapa Rūnaka ki Puketeraki, Te Rūnanga o Ōtākou and Hokonui Rūnanga (Kāi Tahu ki Otago) and Te Rūnanga o Waihōpai, Te Rūnanga o Awarua and Te Rūnanga o Ōraka-Aparima (Kāi Tahu ki Murihiku). Intellectual property rights are reserved by these rūnanga. Acknowledgement The preparation of this report was undertaken with the assistance of: Te Rūnanga o Moeraki Kāti Huirapa Rūnaka ki Puketeraki Te Rūnanga o Ōtākou Hokonui Rūnanga Te Rūnanga o Waihōpai Te Rūnanga o Awarua Te Rūnanga o Ōraka-Aparima Key informants and site evaluation participants. Peter Petchey and Brian Allingham. Front Cover: The confluence of the Cardrona and Clutha rivers. Photograph: Maree Kleinlangevelsloo Version: October 2017 KTKO Ltd Prepared by: Level 1 Maree Kleinlangevelsloo 258 Stuart Street Literature Review: Rosemary Clucas PO Box 446 Reviewed By: Dunedin Te Rūnanga o Moeraki Tel: 03-477–0071 Kāti Huirapa Rūnaka ki Puketeraki Te Rūnanga o Ōtākou Hokonui Rūnaka Te Rūnanga o Awarua Te Rūnanga o Waihōpai Te Rūnanga o Ōraka-Aparima Tim Vial (KTKO Ltd) 1 Executive Summary The Arrow and Cardrona catchments and the Wakatipu Basin are highly valued by the whānau of Kāi Tahu ki Otago and Murihiku (Kāi Tahu). Ara tawhito (trails), ran through these catchments, bringing whānau into the southern lakes and rivers on their seasonal pursuit of resources. Today the rivers are used for recreation, and are valued for their landscape qualities and the species residing in them.
    [Show full text]
  • Insider's Guide
    MajorDomo Limited PO Box 128, Arrowtown 9351 Phone: +64 3 442 0502 Email: [email protected] www.majordomo.co.nz The MajorDomo Insider’s Guide +64 3 442 0502 | [email protected] | www.majordomo.co.nz Private villas Luxury accommodation Inspirational experiences Concierge services Contents IN VILLA Food and wine 2 For the little ones 2 Wellness 3 Getting around 5 EXPERIENCES All-inclusive day trips 6 On the water 8 In the air 10 Bikes and hikes 12 Golf 14 Wellness 15 Extreme adventures 16 Wanaka experiences 18 Winter fun 20 Wine tasting 23 DINING OUT 24 SHOPPING 34 Disclaimer: All prices are in New Zealand dollars and include GST. Prices are indicative only, dependent USEFUL INFO 37 on the operator and season, and subject to change. The gift of time – from your MajorDomo concierge As a guest of MajorDomo we’d like to offer you our personal MajorDomo concierge service, completely complimentary. WHY BOOK WITH US? We’re just a phone call We can tailor your holiday to or email away to book fit you like a glove by using any of your activities our local insider’s knowledge or in-house services. and listening to you and your How handy is that? holiday needs. We specialise in surprise One point of contact and delight and are + one easy invoice experts at arranging at the end of your stay those cherry-on-the-top = one seamless and moments. memorable experience. To open the door on uniquely inspiring experiences, simply read on or give us a bell.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Hearings Panel for the Queenstown Lakes Proposed District Plan
    BEFORE THE HEARINGS PANEL FOR THE QUEENSTOWN LAKES PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER Minute Concerning the National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity SUPPLEMENTARY MEMORANDUM OF COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL REGARDING THE NATIONAL POLICY STATEMENT ON URBAN DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY 19 April 2017 Barristers & Solicitors S J Scott Telephone: +64-3-968 4018 Facsimile: +64-3-379 5023 Email: [email protected] PO Box 874 SOLICITORS CHRISTCHURCH 8140 MAY IT PLEASE THE PANEL: 1. This supplementary memorandum is filed on behalf of the Queenstown Lakes District Council (Council) to respond to a question from the Hearing Panel (Panel) asked during Hearing Stream 10. 2. The Panel asked the Council to confirm where Arrowtown and other towns sit in relation to the definition of 'urban environment' in the National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity 2016 (NPSUDC or NPS). Specifically, the Panel asked whether those towns form part of the Queenstown or Wanaka 'urban environments'. This question relates to paragraphs 23 and 24 of the Council's Memorandum of Counsel dated 3 March 2017 (March Memorandum), where it is stated that although there is some uncertainty as to what parts of the District are an 'urban environment' in their own right, it is accepted that Queenstown itself is a 'high growth urban area' and therefore the NPS applies to the District as a whole. The March Memorandum then states that the NPS provisions apply in tiers and differentiates between the parts of the NPS that refer to urban environments, urban environments expected to experience growth, and medium and high- growth urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomasi SHA, Arthurs Point Transport Assessment
    19 October 2017 Bullendale Developments Limited C/- Momentum Projects By email Attention: Shane Fairmaid Dear Shane, Tomasi SHA, Arthurs Point Transport Assessment The purpose of this letter is to provide a high level transport assessment for a proposed Tomasi Special Housing Area (SHA) to be created at Arthurs Point, Queenstown. The assessment will consider if there is additional capacity within the existing transport infrastructure to accommodate the proposed development. 1 Background The proposed SHA, Tomasi, is an extension of Bullendale at 157 Arthurs Point Road. The Tomasi development is to be located within Lot 2 DP12913 and will be accessed through the Bullendale Subdivision which is a SHA created under consent approval SH160143. Bullendale is not fully constructed although design drawings have been approved for the access from Arthurs Point Road. This high level transport assessment utilises the detailed design for Bullendale as well as traffic modelling and analysis undertaken during the consent stage. 2 Existing Transport Network For the purposes of this assessment it is assumed that the existing transport network will include infrastructure which has been consented and is being constructed within the Bullendale subdivision, refer SH160143. Bullendale will establish a new residential access road, Bullendale Drive, which will be formed as a Suburban Local Road1. This road will have a 5.5m movement lane with separate footpaths and indented on-street parking. This road type can serve up to 200 residential dwellings. Bullendale Drive is consented to serve 88 residential dwellings within at Bullendale. Bullendale Drive is to be accessed from Arthurs Point Road. This intersection has been consented and the detailed design has engineering approval.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learnt Preparing a 30 Year Infrastructure Strategy for the Queenstown-Lakes District
    A CASE STUDY: LESSONS LEARNT PREPARING A 30 YEAR INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY FOR THE QUEENSTOWN-LAKES DISTRICT Lead Author: Polly Lambert Policy, Standards & Assets Planner, Queenstown Lakes District Council Queenstown Co-Author: Dr Deborah Lind Infrastructure Advisor, Rationale Ltd Arrowtown Abstract The Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Act 2014 became law on 8 August 2014, requiring councils to prepare an infrastructure strategy for at least a 30 year period, and to incorporate this into their long-term plans from 2015. The Queenstown Lakes District is a recognised tourism destination that supports economic growth across the southern part of the South Island of New Zealand and contributes significantly to the ‘NZ Inc.’ global brand. As such, the district is attractive to local and international investment in housing, services and visitor related activities. The current resident population of 29,000 supports the infrastructure services for a peak day population of 100,000 people. Combined with the fact that the District is one of the highest future growth areas in the country, this placed increased pressure on the three waters and transport services in terms of capacity and service delivery. This paper will share the approach, challenges and outcomes of preparing a 30 year infrastructure strategy for the Queenstown Lakes District and the lessons learnt to inform, and improve on, future infrastructure planning. Key Words (wiki’s) 30 Year Infrastructure Strategy, LGA Section 101, Asset Management, Forward Planning, Long Term Plan, Evidence Based Decision Making adventure, exploration, creativity or relaxation. Our District The Queenstown Lakes District is The Queenstown Lakes District has a land synonymous with innovation, adventure and area of 8,705 km² and a total area (including bucket lists.
    [Show full text]
  • Queenstown Lakes District Plan Review, Chapter 26: Historic Heritage
    DISTRICT PLAN REVIEW CHAPTER 26: HISTORIC HERITAGE SUBMISSION TO THE QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL 23 OCTOBER 2015 1. BACKGROUND TO IPENZ The Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand (IPENZ) is the lead national professional body representing the engineering profession in New Zealand. It has approximately 16,000 Members, and includes a cross-section of engineering students, practising engineers, and senior Members in positions of responsibility in business. IPENZ is non-aligned and seeks to contribute to the community in matters of national interest giving a learned view on important issues, independent of any commercial interest. As the lead engineering organisation in New Zealand, IPENZ has responsibility for advocating for the protection and conservation of New Zealand’s engineering heritage. IPENZ manages a Heritage Register and a Heritage Record for engineering items throughout New Zealand. The IPENZ Engineering Heritage Register has criteria and thresholds similar to Category 1 historic places on Heritage New Zealand’s New Zealand Heritage List/Rārangi Kōrero. Items on our Register have been assessed as being engineering achievements of outstanding or special heritage significance. IPENZ is still populating the Register. The IPENZ Engineering Heritage Record includes histories of industrial and engineering items around New Zealand, and is also subject to ongoing improvements and additions. 2. GENERAL COMMENTS 2.1 INTRODUCTION The scheduling of heritage places in the District Plans of local authorities is an important mechanism that IPENZ supports because of our objective of promoting the protection, preservation and conservation of New Zealand’s engineering heritage. The Queenstown Lakes District has a very rich heritage and in particular has a wealth of industrial and engineering heritages sites because of the area’s early mining, agricultural and pastoral history and its challenging topography.
    [Show full text]
  • Wakatipu Basin
    24 WAKATIPU BASIN WAKATIPU QLDC PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN [PART FOUR] NOVEMBER 2017 24 WAKATIPU BASIN 24.1 Zone Purpose This chapter applies to the Wakatipu Basin Rural Amenity Zone (the Zone) and Wakatipu Basin Lifestyle Precinct (the Precinct). The purpose of the Zone is to protect, maintain and enhance the particular character and amenity of the rural landscape which distinguishes the Wakatipu Basin from other parts of the District that are zoned Rural. A primary focus of the Zone is on protecting, maintaining and enhancing rural landscape and amenity values while noting that productive WAKATIPU BASIN WAKATIPU farming is not a dominant activity in the Wakatipu Basin. To achieve the purpose of the Zone a minimum lot size of 80 hectares is required 24 if subdividing and all buildings except small farm buildings in the Zone require resource consent as a means to ensure rural landscape character and visual amenity outcomes are fulfi lled. 2017 A wide range of supportive activities that rely on and seek to locate within the rural landscape resource are contemplated in the Zone including rural living at low densities, recreation, commercial and tourism activities as well as enabling farming and farming related NOVEMBER NOVEMBER activities. There are also some established industrial type activities that are based on rural resources or support rural type activities. Land within the District is subject to natural hazards and, where applicable, it is anticipated that development will recognise and manage the risks of natural hazards at the time of subdivision and applications for resource consent for buildings. Within the Zone, variations in landscape character support higher levels of development in identifi ed Wakatipu Basin Lifestyle Precinct areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Consent Applications Received for the Queenstown Lakes District
    RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATIONS RECEIVED FOR THE QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL INFORMATION SERVICE Private Bag 50072 QUEENSTOWN 9348 T: 03 441 0499 F: 03 450 2223 [email protected] www.qldc.govt.co.nz © Copyright 01.08.19 – 31.08.19 RC NO APPLICANT & PROPOSAL ZONE STATUS BRIGHT SKY LAND LIMITED - SUBDIVISION AND LAND USE RESOURCE CONSENT UNDER THE HOUSING ACCORDS AND SPECIAL HOUSING AREAS ACT AT On Hold External SH190490 GOLF COURSE ROAD, WANAKA IND2 Report Required QUEENSTOWN HOUSING LIMITED - APPLICATION UNDER S25 OF THE HASHAA FOR A 632 LOT SUBDIVISION, EARTHWORKS, ROADING AND LANDSCAPING, AND BLANK LAND USE CONSENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, CANCELLATION OF CONSENT NOTICE AT 436 On Hold at Applicants SH190488 KINGSTON ROAD, KINGSTON RURAL JP Request RM191079 B ROBERTSON - IDENTIFICATION OF SIGNAGE PLATFORMS AT 85 GLENDA DRIVE, FRANKTON IND1 Formally Received QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL - TO UNDERTAKE A TEMPORARY RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY AND PROVIDE PUBLIC AMENITIES FROM 10 RM191074 NOVEMBER 2019 TO 25 APRIL 2020 (RESPONSIBLE CAMPING SERVICE HUB) AT 101 BALLANTYNE ROAD, WANAKA BRMU Formally Received B HENLEY, G HENLEY & C WARD - CONSTRUCT A SHED OUTSIDE A BUILDING PLATFORM, UNDERTAKE EARTHWORKS, BOUNDARY & SETBACK RM191072 BREACHES AT 228 WANAKA-LUGGATE, HIGHWAY, WANAKA RLF Formally Received TREESPACE NO 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATION TO UNDERTAKE A VARIATION TO RESOURCE CONSENT RM180239 TO UNDERTAKE ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS TO AN EXISTING BUILDING ON MT
    [Show full text]
  • Wakatipu Trails Strategy
    Wakatipu Trails Strategy Prepared for: Wakatipu Trails Trust Prepared by: Tourism Resource Consultants in association with Natural Solutions for Nature Ltd and Beca Carter Hollings and Ferner Ltd May 2004 Wakatipu Trails Strategy: TRC, May 2004 Page Table of Contents No. Executive Summary 2 Section 1. Introduction 7 Section 2. The Current Situation – Where Are We Now? 9 Section 3. A Vision for the Trails in the Wakatipu Basin 14 Section 4. Strategic Goals 15 Section 5. Priorities and Estimated Development Costs 29 Section 6A. Implementation Plan - Summary 33 Section 6B. Implementation Plan - Arterial Trails for 34 Walking and Cycling Section 6C. Implementation Plan - Recreational Trails 35 Section 6D. Implementation Plan – Management 36 Implications Appendix 1. Indicative Standards of the Wakatipu Trails 39 Network Appendix 2. Recreational User Requirements for the Rural 42 Road Network Appendix 3. Potential Public Access Network 46 1 1 Wakatipu Trails Strategy: TRC, May 2004 Executive The strategy was prepared to guide development of an integrated Summary network of walking and cycling trails and cycle-ways in the Wakatipu Basin. Preparation of the strategy was initiated by the Wakatipu Trails Trust in association with Transfund and Queenstown Lakes District Council. Funding was provided by Transfund and Council. The Department of Conservation and Otago Regional Council have also been key parties to the strategy. Vision The strategy’s vision – that of creating a world class trail and cycle network - is entirely appropriate given the scenic splendour, international profile and accessibility of the Wakatipu Basin. At its centre, Queenstown is New Zealand’s premier tourist destination. Well known for bungy jumping, rafting, skiing and jet boating, it has the informal status of being this country’s ‘adventure capital’.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste for Otago (The Omnibus Plan Change)
    Key Issues Report Plan Change 8 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago and Plan Change 1 to the Regional Plan: Waste for Otago (The Omnibus Plan Change) Appendices Appendix A: Minster’s direction matter to be called in to the environment court Appendix B: Letter from EPA commissioning the report Appendix C: Minister’s letter in response to the Skelton report Appendix D: Skelton report Appendix E: ORC’s letter in responding to the Minister with work programme Appendix F: Relevant sections of the Regional Plan: Water for Otago Appendix G: Relevant sections of the Regional Plan: Waste for Otago Appendix H: Relevant provisions of the Resource Management Act 1991 Appendix I: National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020 Appendix J: Relevant provisions of the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater 2020 Appendix K: Relevant provisions of the Resource Management (Stock Exclusion) Regulations 2020 Appendix L: Relevant provisions of Otago Regional Council Plans and Regional Policy Statements Appendix M: Relevant provisions of Iwi management plans APPENDIX A Ministerial direction to refer the Otago Regional Council’s proposed Omnibus Plan Change to its Regional Plans to the Environment Court Having had regard to all the relevant factors, I consider that the matters requested to be called in by Otago Regional Council (ORC), being the proposed Omnibus Plan Change (comprised of Water Plan Change 8 – Discharge Management, and Waste Plan Change 1 – Dust Suppressants and Landfills) to its relevant regional plans are part of a proposal of national significance. Under section 142(2) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA), I direct those matters to be referred to the Environment Court for decision.
    [Show full text]
  • WOMEN's GOLF CALENDAR 2021 11 Feb 21
    2021 January SUMMER GOLF: 9AM 18 hole, 9.30AM 9 hole MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY 28 29 30 31 01 02 03 NEW YEAR MIXED WANAKA 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 9 HOLE WOMEN: SUMMER GOLF WAIKOUAITI SUMMER GOLF 9AM START 9.30 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 9 HOLE WOMEN: SUMMER GOLF SUMMER GOLF 9AM START 9.30 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 9 HOLE WOMEN: SUMMER GOLF CLUB OPENING DAY SUMMER GOLF 9AM START JUBILEE CUP 9.30 LAST DAY LAST DAY STABLEFORD 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 9 HOLE WOMEN ARROWTOWN WOMEN'S 4 BALL BEST BALL OPENING DAY/ CLUB (4BBB) STABLEFORD CAPTAIN'S CHOICE 01 02 Notes: Throughout this calendar --- TUESDAY'S PROGRAMME IS THE 9 HOLE COMPETITION: THURSDAY'S PROGRAMME IS THE 18 HOLE COMPETITION; UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED 2021 February START 9.30AM MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 9 HOLE WOMEN: WGNZ COW MEDAL POINTS WAITANGI DAY C.O.TRIOLOGY Alex, Dunst, STABLEFORD & RINGERS START C.O.TRIOLOGY Alex, Omak Dunst, Omak 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 (WAITANGI DAY 9 HOLE WOMEN: MEDAL NEW ORLEANS OBSERVED) & PUTTING STABLEFORD ARROWTOWN LIFESTYLE RETIREMENT VILLAGE QUAICH TOURNAMENT 4BBB MIXED 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 9 HOLE WOMEN: SCOTTISH STABLEFORD DUNSTAN CLASSIC DUNSTAN CLASSIC QUEENSTOWN ARROWTOWN WOMEN'S TWO-DAY LIFESTYLE CLASSIC RETIREMENT VILLAGE STABLEFORD QUEENSTOWN WOMEN'S TWO-DAY CLASSIC 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9 HOLE WOMEN: LOCATIONS REALTY AMBROSE TROPHY BEST NETT OVER FIELD 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 Notes: TUESDAY COMP IS FOR 9 HOLE MEMBERS; THURSDAY COMP IS FOR 18 HOLE MEMBERS 2021 March START 9.30AM
    [Show full text]