Waste for Otago (The Omnibus Plan Change)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Waste for Otago (The Omnibus Plan Change) Key Issues Report Plan Change 8 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago and Plan Change 1 to the Regional Plan: Waste for Otago (The Omnibus Plan Change) Appendices Appendix A: Minster’s direction matter to be called in to the environment court Appendix B: Letter from EPA commissioning the report Appendix C: Minister’s letter in response to the Skelton report Appendix D: Skelton report Appendix E: ORC’s letter in responding to the Minister with work programme Appendix F: Relevant sections of the Regional Plan: Water for Otago Appendix G: Relevant sections of the Regional Plan: Waste for Otago Appendix H: Relevant provisions of the Resource Management Act 1991 Appendix I: National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020 Appendix J: Relevant provisions of the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater 2020 Appendix K: Relevant provisions of the Resource Management (Stock Exclusion) Regulations 2020 Appendix L: Relevant provisions of Otago Regional Council Plans and Regional Policy Statements Appendix M: Relevant provisions of Iwi management plans APPENDIX A Ministerial direction to refer the Otago Regional Council’s proposed Omnibus Plan Change to its Regional Plans to the Environment Court Having had regard to all the relevant factors, I consider that the matters requested to be called in by Otago Regional Council (ORC), being the proposed Omnibus Plan Change (comprised of Water Plan Change 8 – Discharge Management, and Waste Plan Change 1 – Dust Suppressants and Landfills) to its relevant regional plans are part of a proposal of national significance. Under section 142(2) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA), I direct those matters to be referred to the Environment Court for decision. My reasons are as follows: National Significance I consider the matters are part of a proposal of national significance having given regard to the following relevant factors in section 142(3) of the RMA: a) The issues the plan changes aim to address have aroused widespread public concern or interest regarding their actual or likely effect on the environment, as indicated by the Skelton Investigation; b) The plan changes involve or are likely to involve the significant use of natural and physical resources while managing the impact of that use on the environment; c) The plan changes affect or are likely to affect areas of national significance noting that Otago freshwater catchments provide a habitat for a suite of nationally important non-migratory Galaxias taxas; d) The plan changes are part of the ORC’s programme to give effect to the National Policy Statement on Freshwater Management; e) Failure to implement the plan changes has the potential to result in significant and irreversible changes to the environment; f) The plan changes are or are likely to be significant in terms of section 8 of the RMA given they are likely to be of high interest to Iwi because of the significance of freshwater management to Māori; and g) The plan changes will affect more than one district given that they will apply across the whole Otago region. Direction to the Environment Court I direct that the proposed Omnibus Plan Change be referred to the Environment Court for decision because: a) Calling in the related plan changes as parts of a proposal of national significance for a decision at the same time would: i. assist the Otago Regional Council by allowing its staff to focus on developing a new Land and Water Regional Plan; and ii. avoid potential delays associated with the Schedule 1 process of the RMA that could complicate the development of a new Land and Water Regional Plan. b) The current COVID-19 situation would make the appointment of suitable members to a board of inquiry difficult in a short timeframe whereas the Environment Court process would provide surety in terms of progressing a decision on the matters. Page 1 of 2 In reaching my decision I considered: a) The Environmental Protection Authority recommendation that I refer the matters to the Environment Court; b) The views of the Otago Regional Council, being the applicant and the relevant local authority that would have processed and decided the matters if I had not directed that they be referred to the Environment Court for decision; and c) The capacity of the Otago Regional Council to process the matters. Dated at Auckland this 8th day of April 2020 Hon David Parker Minister for the Environment Page 2 of 2 APPENDIX B File ref: NSP 45 15 September 2020 Gwyneth Elsum General Manager, Strategy, Policy and Science Private Bag 63002 Otago Regional Council Wellington 6140, New Zealand Private Bag 1954 Level 10, Grant Thornton House Dunedin 9054 215 Lambton Quay New Zealand Wellington 6011, New Zealand epa.govt.nz +64 4 916 2426 By email: [email protected]; [email protected] Dear Ms Elsum Omnibus Plan Change – Section 149G(3) Report Further to our letter of 1 July 2020, the purpose of this letter is to formally commission the Otago Regional Council to prepare a Key Issue Report under section 149G(3) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) for the Omnibus Plan Change. The scope for the report is outlined below and has been informed by discussions with Judge Borthwick, Philip Maw and Peter Constantine: Scope of Key Issues Report Pursuant to section 149G(3) of the Resource Management Act 1991, the EPA commissions the Otago Regional Council to prepare a report on the key issues in relation to Plan Change 8 (Discharge Management) to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago and Plan Change 1 (Dust Suppressants and Landfills) to the Regional Plan: Waste for Otago (Omnibus Plan Change) that includes: A summary of the state of the environment in the Otago Region as it relates to the Omnibus Plan Change; A summary of the current planning framework in the Otago Region as it relates to the Omnibus Plan Change; A description of the resource management issue(s) presented by the state of the environment and current planning framework that needs to be resolved; A summary of the higher order planning and policy instruments relevant to the Omnibus Plan Change with a list of the relevant provisions of any relevant national policy statement, New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement, national planning standard, regional policy statement or proposed regional policy statement, plan or proposed plan to be appended to the report. NB: Where relevant, this section should include the section 24A (RMA) recommendations made by the Minister for the Environment - (18 November 2019) and agreed to by ORC (16 December 2019), and instruments that have come into effect after preparation of the plan change, such as: o National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management (NPS-FM) - came into effect 3 September 2020 o National Environmental Standards for Freshwater (NESF) - came into effect 3 September 2020 (except for some exceptions that have later deadlines) o Freshwater Planning Process (FPP) - came into effect via Section 80A of the Resource Management Amendment Act 2020 on 30 June 2020; and A description of the solution proposed by the Omnibus Plan Change. Please contact Jillian Kennemore on mobile: 027 641 7250 or by email [email protected] if you have any questions. Yours sincerely Terry Calmeyer Acting Manager Land and Oceans Applications - Regulatory Systems and Operational Policy 2 APPENDIX C APAPPENDIX D Investigation of Freshwater Management and Allocation Functions at Otago Regional Council Report to the Minister for the Environment by Professor Peter Skelton CNZM; D.Nat.Res (Hon); LLB; FEIANZ 1 October 2019 Acknowledgements Peter Skelton wishes to acknowledge the considerable assistance he has received from Ministry for the Environment officials Robert McClean, Carly O’Connor and Rowan Taylor in both the investigation work and the preparation of this report. This document may be cited as: Skelton, Peter (2019) Investigation of Freshwater Management and Allocation Functions at Otago Regional Council - Report to the Minister for the Environment. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment. Cover photo: Falls Dam and the Hawkdun Range, Central Otago (R McClean, 25 June 2019) Published (publication details to be confirmed) Ministry for the Environment Manatū Mō Te Taiao PO Box 10362, Wellington 6143, New Zealand ISBN: ISBN print version (print) ISBN online version (online) Publication number: MfE – to be confirmed © Crown copyright New Zealand 2019 This document is to be made available on the Ministry for the Environment website: www.mfe.govt.nz. iii iv Contents Executive Summary 7 Introduction 9 Deemed permits 14 Overview of the Otago planning framework 17 The Otago Regional Policy Statement 18 Regional Plan: Water for Otago 21 Current Council capacity and capability 26 Kāi Tahu perspectives 29 Stakeholder perspectives 31 Findings and recommendations 34 Recommendations 38 Appendix 1 40 Letter of Engagement 40 Appendix 2 41 Letter of extension 41 Appendix 3 42 Terms of Reference for Section 24A Investigation of Otago Regional Council Performance under the Resource Management Act 1991 42 Appendix 4 44 The list of interviewees 44 Appendix 4 45 The list of interviewees - continued 45 Appendix 5 46 History of regulation – the Otago mining privileges 46 Mining Privileges under the RMA 53 Extract from Rules and Regulations of the Otago Goldfields 1862 55 Appendix 6 59 Summary of the state of the freshwater environment for the Manuherekia, Arrow, Cardrona, and Taieri catchments 59 v Appendix 7 Regional Plan: Water 73 6 Executive Summary The Otago region is at a critical juncture for freshwater planning. Existing planning provisions to manage freshwater are inadequate and the expiry of the Otago mining privileges (deemed permits) is only two years away. There are also growing challenges for the state of the freshwater resource in Otago in view of the high level of water abstraction and the significant alteration of natural flows, ecosystems and habitat for indigenous flora and fauna.
Recommended publications
  • Section and Level Crossing All Located Within a Short Section of Highway
    2018 update of the Otago Southland Regional Land Transport Plans 2015-2021 Descriptions of prioritised activities and projects for 2018-21 The committees have prioritised the larger projects into two priority bands, taking into account the benefits that each project would help realise, whether it forms part of an integrated programme of works for a particular area, and whether it is of inter-regional significance. Projects for which insufficient information is available to judge how the results will align with RLTP strategy are included in the lower priority band; this applies to a suite of NZTA safety projects for Otago that are in the 2018 Transport Agency Investment Plan. Integrated programmes of work are kept within a single prioritisation category, since all projects within such a programme need to be implemented in order to realise the anticipated benefits. Priority One projects – Southland NZTA Project Name: SH 1 - Edendale Realignment Item No 19 & 23 Organisation NZTA Project Funding $13,178,058 Project Years 2015 to 2018 Project description Issues with variations in the speed limits through the Edendale township and a right-angled bend with an adjacent intersection and level crossing all located within a short section of highway. Any expansion of Fonterra’s plant will generate additional traffic, which will travel past residential properties and a school. The project will provide a bypass to the township, with appropriate connections to the Fonterra plant. Reason for priority Benefits safety, also network performance and capability, and regional development. The project improves safety for vehicles and other road users within the Edendale township.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Hearings Panel for the Queenstown Lakes Proposed District Plan
    BEFORE THE HEARINGS PANEL FOR THE QUEENSTOWN LAKES PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of Stage 3 of the Proposed District Plan, Chapter 30 Variation EVIDENCE OF BEN MACKEY ON BEHALF OF OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL AJL-266090-1074-33-V1 EVIDENCE OF BEN MACKEY ON BEHALF OF OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Statement of Professional Qualifications and Experience 1. My full name is Benjamin Hunter Mackey. I am a Natural Hazard Analyst at the Otago Regional Council based in Dunedin. 2. I hold an LLB(Hons) and BSc(Hons) from the University of Canterbury, and a PhD in Geology from the University of Oregon (USA). My PhD research focussed on the long-term behaviour of slow-moving landslides. 3. I have been in my current role with the Otago Regional Council (ORC) for five years. This job involves assessing natural hazards across Otago, and working with local authorities and the public to manage risk from natural hazards. I have travelled extensively across the Queenstown Lakes District as part of my job with ORC, and have visited all the sites discussed in this submission multiple times. 4. I was not involved in the preparation of the Otago Regional Council submission or the further submissions. I have been asked by the Otago Regional Council to provide examples of existing and potential works in the Queenstown Lakes District aimed at mitigating the effects of natural hazards. Code of Conduct 5. I confirm that I have read the Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses as contained in the Environment Court’s Practice Note of 2014 and agree to comply with it.
    [Show full text]
  • Data and Information Committee Agenda 9 June 2021 - Agenda
    Data and Information Committee Agenda 9 June 2021 - Agenda Data and Information Committee Agenda 9 June 2021 Meeting is held in the Council Chamber, Level 2, Philip Laing House 144 Rattray Street, Dunedin Members: Hon Cr Marian Hobbs, Co-Chair Cr Michael Laws Cr Alexa Forbes, Co-Chair Cr Kevin Malcolm Cr Hilary Calvert Cr Andrew Noone Cr Michael Deaker Cr Gretchen Robertson Cr Carmen Hope Cr Bryan Scott Cr Gary Kelliher Cr Kate Wilson Senior Officer: Sarah Gardner, Chief Executive Meeting Support: Liz Spector, Committee Secretary 09 June 2021 02:00 PM Agenda Topic Page 1. APOLOGIES No apologies were received prior to publication of the agenda. 2. PUBLIC FORUM No requests to address the Committee under Public Forum were received prior to publication of the agenda. 3. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Note: Any additions must be approved by resolution with an explanation as to why they cannot be delayed until a future meeting. 4. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Members are reminded of the need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have. 5. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 3 Minutes of previous meetings will be considered true and accurate records, with or without changes. 5.1 Minutes of the 10 March 2021 Data and Information Committee meeting 3 6. OUTSTANDING ACTIONS OF DATA AND INFORMATION COMMITTEE RESOLUTIONS 8 Outstanding actions from resolutions of the Committee will be reviewed. 6.1 Action Register at 9 June 2021 8 7. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 9 1 Data and Information Committee Agenda 9 June 2021 - Agenda 7.1 OTAGO GREENHOUSE GAS PROFILE FY2018/19 9 This report is provided to present the Committee with the Otago Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory FY2018/19 and report.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Clutha River
    IMAF Water-based recreation on the lower Clutha River Fisheries Environmental Report No. 61 lirllilr' Fisheries Research Division N.Z. Ministry of Agriculture and F¡sheries lssN 01't1-4794 Fisheries Environmental Report No. 61 t^later-based necreation on the I ower Cl utha R'i ver by R. ldhiting Fisheries Research Division N.Z. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Roxbu rgh January I 986 FISHERIES ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS Th'is report js one of a series of reports jssued by Fisheries Research Dìvjsion on important issues related to environmental matters. They are i ssued under the fol I owi ng cri teri a: (1) They are'informal and should not be cited wjthout the author's perm'issi on. (2) They are for l'imited c'irculatjon, so that persons and organ'isat'ions normal ly rece'ivi ng F'i sheries Research Di vi si on publ'i cat'ions shoul d not expect to receive copies automatically. (3) Copies will be issued in'itjaììy to organ'isations to which the report 'i s d'i rectìy rel evant. (4) Copi es wi I 1 be i ssued to other appropriate organ'isat'ions on request to Fì sherì es Research Dj vi si on, M'inì stry of Agricu'lture and Fisheries, P0 Box 8324, Riccarton, Christchurch. (5) These reports wi'lì be issued where a substant'ial report is required w'ith a time constraint, êg., a submiss'ion for a tnibunal hearing. (6) They will also be issued as interim reports of on-going environmental studies for which year by year orintermìttent reporting is advantageous.
    [Show full text]
  • School Prospectus
    KAIKORAI VALLEY COLLEGE He manu whai huruhuru Opportunity and Success for All School Prospectus Principal’s welcome abilities in a safe and caring environment, makes an impact on a young person’s free from harassment and bullying. life, teachers need to foster a culture built around relationships and learning. Without At Kaikorai Valley College we believe these, the best intentions in the world will strongly in self-management and a sense not bring about improved learning…. To of responsibility. We promote and expect get the best from their students, teachers clear standards of behaviour, and have need to foster the values of empathy, comprehensive structures in place for student caring and respect.” (KVC charter) support. We promote excellence in all facets of life - academic, sporting and cultural. If you would like to look around, or Teachers are dedicated to maximizing the discuss how we might meet your needs, opportunities for students. We believe in please do make contact. I am more than “Opportunity and Success for All.” happy to meet with you and show you around the school at any time. We accept enrolments across all age groups. Our biggest intakes are Rick Geerlofs generally at Years 7 and 9, however Principal students can enter at any levels throughout the school Kaikorai Valley College is a Year 7 – 13 co- year. Our curriculum educational State Secondary School, situated offers depth and in a beautiful park-like setting on the west breadth. Students are side of Dunedin. For over fifty years the able to take a wide school has enjoyed a reputation for providing variety of subjects, a high quality education.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning to Live with Flooding
    Learning to Live with Flooding: A Flood Risk Management Strategy for the communities of Lakes Wakatipu and Wanaka Flood Risk Management Strategy October 2006 Contents Foreword 4 Key Terms 5 Executive Summary 6 1.0 Introduction 8 2.0 Background 8 3.0 Scope 9 3.1 Geographical 9 3.2 Strategy Horizon 11 3.3 Risk Scope 11 4.0 Context 12 4.1 Meteorological Setting 12 4.2 Hydrological Setting 16 4.3 Community Setting 19 4.4 Legislative Context 21 5.0 Principles 24 6.0 Strategic Elements 25 6.1 Understanding Natural River and Catchment Processes 25 6.2 Understanding Infrastructural Flood Risk 27 6.3 Flood Sensitive Urban Planning 28 6.4 Flood Sensitive Design 31 6.5 Enhancing Individual Capacity to Manage Flood Risk 32 6.6 Robust Warning, Prediction and Communications Systems 33 6.7 Timely Flood Emergency Response 33 2 Flood Risk Management Strategy October 2006 6.8 Comprehensive Base Data and Information 35 6.9 Investigation of Appropriate Physical Works 36 7.0 Operating Plan 39 7.1 Roles Overview 39 7.2 Readiness 40 7.3 Response 41 7.4 Recovery 42 8.0 References 43 9.0 Appendices 45 Appendix A: Flood Mitigation Strategy Project Brief 46 Appendix B: Action Plan 53 Appendix C: Flood Inundation Maps: 57 C1 Queenstown CBD 58 C2 Wanaka CBD 59 C3 Kingston 60 C4 Glenorchy 61 3 Flood Risk Management Strategy October 2006 Foreword Flooding has been an issue in the Queenstown Lakes District since European settlement in the 1850s. In the last 150 years significant floods have occurred in 1878, 1924, 1994, 1995 and most recently and dramatically in 1999 when severe flooding in Wanaka and the Wakatipu communities of Queenstown, Glenorchy, and Kingston caused extensive damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Hazard of Dunedin's Urban Streams
    Flood hazard of Dunedin’s urban streams Review of Dunedin City District Plan: Natural Hazards Otago Regional Council Private Bag 1954, Dunedin 9054 70 Stafford Street, Dunedin 9016 Phone 03 474 0827 Fax 03 479 0015 Freephone 0800 474 082 www.orc.govt.nz © Copyright for this publication is held by the Otago Regional Council. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part, provided the source is fully and clearly acknowledged. ISBN: 978-0-478-37680-7 Published June 2014 Prepared by: Michael Goldsmith, Manager Natural Hazards Jacob Williams, Natural Hazards Analyst Jean-Luc Payan, Investigations Engineer Hank Stocker (GeoSolve Ltd) Cover image: Lower reaches of the Water of Leith, May 1923 Flood hazard of Dunedin’s urban streams i Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope .................................................................................................................... 1 2. Describing the flood hazard of Dunedin’s urban streams .................................................. 4 2.1 Characteristics of flood events ............................................................................... 4 2.2 Floodplain mapping ............................................................................................... 4 2.3 Other hazards ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Character, Riverscape & Visual Amenity Assessments
    Natural Character, Riverscape & Visual Amenity Assessments Clutha/Mata-Au Water Quantity Plan Change – Stage 1 Prepared for Otago Regional Council 15 October 2018 Document Quality Assurance Bibliographic reference for citation: Boffa Miskell Limited 2018. Natural Character, Riverscape & Visual Amenity Assessments: Clutha/Mata-Au Water Quantity Plan Change- Stage 1. Report prepared by Boffa Miskell Limited for Otago Regional Council. Prepared by: Bron Faulkner Senior Principal/ Landscape Architect Boffa Miskell Limited Sue McManaway Landscape Architect Landwriters Reviewed by: Yvonne Pfluger Senior Principal / Landscape Planner Boffa Miskell Limited Status: Final Revision / version: B Issue date: 15 October 2018 Use and Reliance This report has been prepared by Boffa Miskell Limited on the specific instructions of our Client. It is solely for our Client’s use for the purpose for which it is intended in accordance with the agreed scope of work. Boffa Miskell does not accept any liability or responsibility in relation to the use of this report contrary to the above, or to any person other than the Client. Any use or reliance by a third party is at that party's own risk. Where information has been supplied by the Client or obtained from other external sources, it has been assumed that it is accurate, without independent verification, unless otherwise indicated. No liability or responsibility is accepted by Boffa Miskell Limited for any errors or omissions to the extent that they arise from inaccurate information provided by the Client or
    [Show full text]
  • General Distribution and Characteristics of Active Faults and Folds in the Clutha and Dunedin City Districts, Otago
    General distribution and characteristics of active faults and folds in the Clutha and Dunedin City districts, Otago DJA Barrell GNS Science Consultancy Report 2020/88 April 2021 DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared by the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited (GNS Science) exclusively for and under contract to Otago Regional Council. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by GNS Science, GNS Science accepts no responsibility for any use of or reliance on any contents of this report by any person other than Otago Regional Council and shall not be liable to any person other than Otago Regional Council, on any ground, for any loss, damage or expense arising from such use or reliance. Use of Data: Date that GNS Science can use associated data: March 2021 BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE Barrell DJA. 2021. General distribution and characteristics of active faults and folds in the Clutha and Dunedin City districts, Otago. Dunedin (NZ): GNS Science. 71 p. Consultancy Report 2020/88. Project Number 900W4088 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... IV 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................1 1.1 Background .....................................................................................................1 1.2 Scope and Purpose .........................................................................................5 2.0 INFORMATION SOURCES ........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Otago Mar 2018
    Birds New Zealand PO Box 834, Nelson. osnz.org.nz Regional Representative: Mary Thompson 197 Balmacewen Rd, Dunedin. [email protected] 03 4640787 Regional Recorder: Richard Schofield, 64 Frances Street, Balclutha 9230. [email protected] Otago Region Newsletter 3/2018 March 2018 Otago Summer Wader Count 27 November 2017 Catlins Karitane Karitane Aramoana Aramoana Total 2017 Total 2017 Total 2016 Blueskin Bay Blueskin Bay Harbour east east Harbour Papanui Inlet Papanui Inlet Harbour west west Harbour Inlet Hoopers Pied Oystercatcher 57 129 0 195 24 60 21 238 724 270 Variable Oystercatcher 14 12 0 26 34 47 0 4 137 45 Pied Stilt 26 160041515 6 8297 Banded Dotterel 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 15 43 Spur-winged Plover 12 1 2 3 4 50 7 16 95 30 Bar-tailed Godwit 124 472 58 0 0 8 1050 305 2017 1723 I was told that the predicted high tide of 1.8metres was much lower. There were no waders at Aramoana and large areas of mud flats at Hoopers Inlet were occupied by feeding birds; all rather difficult to count accurately. But the results was very good with all areas surveyed by plenty of counters. Many thanks to all for this very good wader count. Peter Schweigman Better late than never. Apologies ed. 2 Ornithological snippets 5 Chukor were seen & photographed at Ben Lomond on 5th March by Trevor Sleight. A pair of Indian Peafowl of unknown origin put in an appearance near Lake Waihola on 15th March. A moulting Erect-crested Penguin was seen at Jacks Bay (Catlins) on 18th Feb, while another crested penguin was at Anderson’s Lagoon (Palmerston) by Paul Smaill on 2nd March.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomasi SHA, Arthurs Point Transport Assessment
    19 October 2017 Bullendale Developments Limited C/- Momentum Projects By email Attention: Shane Fairmaid Dear Shane, Tomasi SHA, Arthurs Point Transport Assessment The purpose of this letter is to provide a high level transport assessment for a proposed Tomasi Special Housing Area (SHA) to be created at Arthurs Point, Queenstown. The assessment will consider if there is additional capacity within the existing transport infrastructure to accommodate the proposed development. 1 Background The proposed SHA, Tomasi, is an extension of Bullendale at 157 Arthurs Point Road. The Tomasi development is to be located within Lot 2 DP12913 and will be accessed through the Bullendale Subdivision which is a SHA created under consent approval SH160143. Bullendale is not fully constructed although design drawings have been approved for the access from Arthurs Point Road. This high level transport assessment utilises the detailed design for Bullendale as well as traffic modelling and analysis undertaken during the consent stage. 2 Existing Transport Network For the purposes of this assessment it is assumed that the existing transport network will include infrastructure which has been consented and is being constructed within the Bullendale subdivision, refer SH160143. Bullendale will establish a new residential access road, Bullendale Drive, which will be formed as a Suburban Local Road1. This road will have a 5.5m movement lane with separate footpaths and indented on-street parking. This road type can serve up to 200 residential dwellings. Bullendale Drive is consented to serve 88 residential dwellings within at Bullendale. Bullendale Drive is to be accessed from Arthurs Point Road. This intersection has been consented and the detailed design has engineering approval.
    [Show full text]
  • LWB Issue 760.Indd
    GUIDEGIG LAKES WEEKLY PAGE 15 21st Jul - 27th BULLETIN FIRST ON THE STREET No 760 WWW.LWB.CO.NZ • BUY • ACCOMMODATION • SELL • INFORMATION • JOBS • [email protected] Boom Scandal Gone I suppose 3 different MP’s in as many terms of government is par for the course in some electorates. Those contestable seats that fl ip and fl op from Labour to National and back again. But here in the Clutha Southland, now Southland electorate we have been wrapped in the blue blanket of the National Party forever. Like it or not. I was excited when National chose a young progressive MP in Todd Barclay after Bill English went to the list. Not that I particularly care for National over Labour but because he was not a farmer. Maybe would give a hoot about the Wakatipu a tad more than Bill did, and that hope came to pass as Todd moved into the neighbourhood in Arrowtown. He spent time with the local business community and learnt what help we needed from central government. Then BOOM. Scandal and gone. Then along came Hamish Walker. Another likeable young bloke. Maybe a little more country than I would like but without a doubt a hard worker. He went into bat for all sorts of social, community and business-related concerns this huge and diverse electorate had. He was available at his Frankton offi ce, answered calls and things were looking up. Life is about building relationships and with Hamish, hopes were high that the Wakatipu #getbumped at the Queenstown Ice Arena in our all new Ice would have a long-term advocate.
    [Show full text]