DOCSLIB.ORG

Queenstown Integrated Transport Programme Business Case

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Queenstown Integrated Transport Programme Business Case Approval ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Revision status* .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Template version................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Supporting documents .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Glossary of terms .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 2. PROGRAMME CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................................... 13 3. PARTNERS AND KEY STAKEHOLDERS .............................................................................................................. 40 4. STRATEGIC ASSESSMENTS – OUTLINING THE NEED FOR INVESTMENT ..................................................... 44 5. ALIGNMENT TO EXISTING STRATEGIES/ORGANISATIONAL GOALS .............................................................. 49 6. ISSUES AND CONSTRAINTS ................................................................................................................................ 53 7. SMART INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................... 55 8. ANTICIPATED STRATEGIC FIT AND EFFECTIVENESS ...................................................................................... 57 1. ALTERNATIVE AND OPTION GENERATION ........................................................................................................ 59 2. PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................................ 60 3. PROGRAMME ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................................... 65 4. RECOMMENDED PROGRAMME .......................................................................................................................... 70 5. RECOMMENDED PROGRAMME – ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 81 6. INVESTMENT PROFILE ......................................................................................................................................... 85 7. PROGRAMME FINANCIAL CASE .......................................................................................................................... 89 1. PLANNING AND DELIVERY OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................. 92 2. MANAGEMENT CASE ............................................................................................................................................ 92 Appendix A – Investment logic map .................................................................................................................................... 94 Appendix B – Benefit map ................................................................................................................................................... 97 Appendix C – Alignment with preceding business cases and discounted options ............................................................ 100 Appendix D – Thinkplace – liveability and visitor experience insights ............................................................................... 102 • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 Location Site ref 2015 AADT % Heavy SH 6 Between SH6/6A junction and Airport 00600996 19180 4 SH6 Frankton North East of junction 00600994 19654 6 SH6A West of Frankton 06A00001 21472 5 SH6A Stanley St – Millenium Hotel 06A00006 17402 7 https://www.nzta.govt.nz/assets/resources/state-highway-traffic-volumes/docs/2011-2015-AADT-Booklet2.pdf 2 http://www.queenstownairport.co.nz/assets/documents/ZQN-Annual-Passengers-Calendar-Year-to-2016.pdf Queenstown’s story, New Zealand Transport Agency, April 2017 http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2016/12/queenstown-house-prices-hit-1-million.html Queenstown’s Story, New Zealand Transport Agency, April 2017 http://www.censusmaps.co.nz/ http://www.qldc.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Council-Documents/Strategies-and-Publications/Queenstown-Lakes-Economic-Development- Strategy-Consultation-Document.pdf http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2016/06/unprecedented-accommodation-demand-hits-queenstown.html • • • • • • • • • I get really sick of the driving and parking issues in this town. It makes it • hard to get on and do my job. (ThinkPlace Research 2017) • ThinkPlace (2017) Liveability & Visitor Experience Insights QLDC Average Day Visitors 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 2001 2006 2011 2013 2015 2018 2023 2028 2033 2038 2043 2048 Day Visitors 2,449 2,926 3,013 2,957 3,391 3,842 4,087 4,306 4,504 4,682 4,842 4,986 Visitors in Private Residences 5,289 6,916 6,790 5,901 7,044 7,951 8,224 8,632 8,992 9,308 9,585 9,827 Visitors in Commercial Accommodation 6,951 7,708 8,433 9,080 10,469 11,979 13,131 14,041 14,901 15,717 16,493 17,232 Visitor Insights Programme, Visitor Experience Queenstown research, July – September 2016, Angus and Associates. Queenstown Lakes District Council, Annual residents survey, June 2016 Rationale (2014), Queenstown Lakes District projections for resident population, dwellings and rating units to 2065 QLDC Growth Projections 2015-2065, November 2015, Rationale Ltd Queenstown Airport Corporation Ltd – Queenstown Airport Masterplan (2017) http://insightsresources.seek.co.nz/seek-employment-trends-regional-spotlight-queenstown-wanaka http://www.mbie.govt.nz/info-services/sectors-industries/tourism/documents-image-library/key-tourism-statistics.pdf Infometrics 2017 https://ecoprofile.infometrics.co.nz/Queenstown%20and%20Wakatipu%20Basin/PDFProfile Infometrics 2017 https://ecoprofile.infometrics.co.nz/Queenstown%20and%20Wakatipu%20Basin/Gdp/Growth https://ecoprofile.infometrics.co.nz/Queenstown%20and%20Wakatipu%20Basin/PDFProfile MBIE Regional Economic Report 2015 Tourism New Zealand Annual Report 2015 -16 Tourism Industry Aotearoa https://tia.org.nz/resources-and-tools/insight/regional-tourisms-gdp-contribution/ • Queenstown Town Centre Transport Programme Business Case, QLDC and NZTA, January 2016 • • • Published in Queenstown and Wanaka Traffic Surveys, MWH, May 2016 Saturday I went out around 11am. And I couldn’t even get to the airport roundabout because the traffic was backed up to the roundabout again (ThinkPlace Research 2017) 2.5.5 I will say probably expensive and limited public transport for sure. It’s hard to get to places if you don’t drive in Queenstown. It’s not designed for people who don’t drive. (ThinkPlace Research 2017) • • I walk everywhere in Wellington despite • there being hills everywhere. The buses are good, I can get from the airport to my hall, which is like 2-3 zones on the bus for like $9, which is really cheap. Here I live 5 minutes from the centre of town and it costs me $8 to go one way. (ThinkPlace Research 2017) 70 60 Min Sch Ave Max 50 40 30 Minutes travel time travel Minutes 20 10 0 Kelvin Heights to Frankton to Kelvin CBD to RTC RTC to CBD LHE to Frankton Frankton to LHE Frankton Heights I’ve had to cancel ballet lessons for my daughter out in Arrowtown. I’ve cancelled the children’s swimming lessons in central Queenstown because it’s just too chock-a-block, and I’m cutting down my work contracts and losing out on pay (ThinkPlace Research 2017) Parking Management Strategies, Evaluation and Planning” T. Litman, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, (2012) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 $million $million per annum 20 10 0 Year 2016 2025 2045 • • The total transportation cost of congestion is the value of travel time and vehicle operating costs over and above the minimum required to travel from A to B at free flow speed without incurring delays at intersections waiting to give way or being stopped at a signalised intersection. Queenstown Town Centre Programme Business Case • QITPBC QITPBC QITPBC QITPBC Stakeholders Focus areas Workshop 1 Workshop 2 Workshop 3 Workshop 4 Invited Attended Invited Attended Invited Attended Invited Attended NZ Transport • State Highway ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Agency Queenstown Lakes • Local and road controlling ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ District Council authority Otago Regional • Regional authority with ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Council responsibility for public transport Queenstown Airport • Airport Operator ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ • Regional tourism organisation Destination responsible for marketing ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Queenstown Queenstown • Guardianship of town centre Downtown QT vitality, growth and resilience ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ • Public face of town centre • Growth, development, support Chamber of and advocacy of the ✓ Commerce Queenstown business sector Ritchies • Commercial provider of transport ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Connectabus services QITPBC QITPBC QITPBC QITPBC Stakeholders Focus areas Workshop 1 Workshop 2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Section and Level Crossing All Located Within a Short Section of Highway
    2018 update of the Otago Southland Regional Land Transport Plans 2015-2021 Descriptions of prioritised activities and projects for 2018-21 The committees have prioritised the larger projects into two priority bands, taking into account the benefits that each project would help realise, whether it forms part of an integrated programme of works for a particular area, and whether it is of inter-regional significance. Projects for which insufficient information is available to judge how the results will align with RLTP strategy are included in the lower priority band; this applies to a suite of NZTA safety projects for Otago that are in the 2018 Transport Agency Investment Plan. Integrated programmes of work are kept within a single prioritisation category, since all projects within such a programme need to be implemented in order to realise the anticipated benefits. Priority One projects – Southland NZTA Project Name: SH 1 - Edendale Realignment Item No 19 & 23 Organisation NZTA Project Funding $13,178,058 Project Years 2015 to 2018 Project description Issues with variations in the speed limits through the Edendale township and a right-angled bend with an adjacent intersection and level crossing all located within a short section of highway. Any expansion of Fonterra’s plant will generate additional traffic, which will travel past residential properties and a school. The project will provide a bypass to the township, with appropriate connections to the Fonterra plant. Reason for priority Benefits safety, also network performance and capability, and regional development. The project improves safety for vehicles and other road users within the Edendale township.
    [Show full text]
  • Otago Conservancy
    A Directory of Wetlands in New Zealand OTAGO CONSERVANCY Sutton Salt Lake (67) Location: 45o34'S, 170o05'E. 2.7 km from Sutton and 8 km from Middlemarch, Straith-Tari area, Otago Region, South Island. Area: 3.7 ha. Altitude: 250 m. Overview: Sutton Salt Lake is a valuable example of an inland or athalassic saline lake, with a considerable variety of saline habitats around its margin and in adjacent slightly saline boggy depressions. The lake is situated in one of the few areas in New Zealand where conditions favour saline lakes (i.e. where precipitation is lower than evaporation). An endemic aquatic animal, Ephydrella novaezealandiae, is present, and there is an interesting pattern of vegetation zonation. Physical features: Sutton Salt Lake is a natural, inland or athalassic saline lake with an average depth of 30 cm and a salinity of 15%. The lake has no known inflow or outflow. The soils are saline and alkaline at the lake margin (sodium-saturated clays), and surrounded by yellow-grey earths and dry subdygrous Matarae. The parent material is loess. Shallow boggy depressions exist near the lake, and there is a narrow fringe of salt tolerant vegetation at the lake margin. Algal communities are present, and often submerged by lake water. The average annual rainfall is about 480 mm, while annual evaporation is about 710 mm. Ecological features: Sutton Salt Lake is one of only five examples of inland saline habitats of botanical value in Central Otago. This is the only area in New Zealand which is suitable for the existence of this habitat, since in general rainfall is high, evaporation is low, and endorheic drainage systems are absent.
    [Show full text]
  • LWB Issue 760.Indd
    GUIDEGIG LAKES WEEKLY PAGE 15 21st Jul - 27th BULLETIN FIRST ON THE STREET No 760 WWW.LWB.CO.NZ • BUY • ACCOMMODATION • SELL • INFORMATION • JOBS • [email protected] Boom Scandal Gone I suppose 3 different MP’s in as many terms of government is par for the course in some electorates. Those contestable seats that fl ip and fl op from Labour to National and back again. But here in the Clutha Southland, now Southland electorate we have been wrapped in the blue blanket of the National Party forever. Like it or not. I was excited when National chose a young progressive MP in Todd Barclay after Bill English went to the list. Not that I particularly care for National over Labour but because he was not a farmer. Maybe would give a hoot about the Wakatipu a tad more than Bill did, and that hope came to pass as Todd moved into the neighbourhood in Arrowtown. He spent time with the local business community and learnt what help we needed from central government. Then BOOM. Scandal and gone. Then along came Hamish Walker. Another likeable young bloke. Maybe a little more country than I would like but without a doubt a hard worker. He went into bat for all sorts of social, community and business-related concerns this huge and diverse electorate had. He was available at his Frankton offi ce, answered calls and things were looking up. Life is about building relationships and with Hamish, hopes were high that the Wakatipu #getbumped at the Queenstown Ice Arena in our all new Ice would have a long-term advocate.
    [Show full text]
  • Queenstown Lakes District Plan Review, Chapter 26: Historic Heritage
    DISTRICT PLAN REVIEW CHAPTER 26: HISTORIC HERITAGE SUBMISSION TO THE QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL 23 OCTOBER 2015 1. BACKGROUND TO IPENZ The Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand (IPENZ) is the lead national professional body representing the engineering profession in New Zealand. It has approximately 16,000 Members, and includes a cross-section of engineering students, practising engineers, and senior Members in positions of responsibility in business. IPENZ is non-aligned and seeks to contribute to the community in matters of national interest giving a learned view on important issues, independent of any commercial interest. As the lead engineering organisation in New Zealand, IPENZ has responsibility for advocating for the protection and conservation of New Zealand’s engineering heritage. IPENZ manages a Heritage Register and a Heritage Record for engineering items throughout New Zealand. The IPENZ Engineering Heritage Register has criteria and thresholds similar to Category 1 historic places on Heritage New Zealand’s New Zealand Heritage List/Rārangi Kōrero. Items on our Register have been assessed as being engineering achievements of outstanding or special heritage significance. IPENZ is still populating the Register. The IPENZ Engineering Heritage Record includes histories of industrial and engineering items around New Zealand, and is also subject to ongoing improvements and additions. 2. GENERAL COMMENTS 2.1 INTRODUCTION The scheduling of heritage places in the District Plans of local authorities is an important mechanism that IPENZ supports because of our objective of promoting the protection, preservation and conservation of New Zealand’s engineering heritage. The Queenstown Lakes District has a very rich heritage and in particular has a wealth of industrial and engineering heritages sites because of the area’s early mining, agricultural and pastoral history and its challenging topography.
    [Show full text]
  • PLAN CHANGE 14 Makarora Rural Lifestyle Zone
    PLAN CHANGE 14 Makarora Rural Lifestyle Zone Section 32 Report Prepared by Vivian+Espie Limited for the Queenstown Lakes District Council 14 September 2007 Section 32 Evaluation Page 1 Makarora Valley Rural Lifestyle Zone EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At present, 880 hectares of the Makarora valley floor is zoned for Rural Living purposes. The Rural Lifestyle Zone permits subdivision as a controlled activity provided new allotments meet a minimum area of 1 hectare and an average allotment size of 2 hectares. Once an allotment is used calculate the above average, all further subdivision becomes non-complying. Residential development within the Rural Lifestyle Zone is a controlled activity where it is located within an approved building platform. Building platforms are required to be identified at the time of subdivision on all lots created by subdivision (except access lots or reserves). The Makarora Rural Lifestyle Zone therefore anticipates that the floor of the Makarora Valley that is currently paddock-land will be subdivided and developed to a minimum lot size of 1 hectare and a average lot size of 2 hectares. Given the size of the Rural Lifestyle Zone at Makarora this would enable in excess of 400 new lots, each with a right to construct a dwelling, residential flat and accessory buildings and curtilage activities. Rural Lifestyle zones of this sort tend to develop a relatively enclosed treed type of character. Under these provisions, the character of the valley floor would become much more fragmented and visually enclosed. Obviously traffic movements, the number of driveways running off the state highway and the presence of people in the valley would consequently increase significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • Greetings, Dear Dr Clark, Please Find Attached the Petition Organised to Support a New Local H
    Crux Recipient: Dr David Clark Letter: Greetings, Dear Dr Clark, Please find attached the petition organised to support a new local hospital for the Queenstown Lakes and Central Otago districts. Not only has the petition been signed by over 5,000 people, but their comments document the sometimes extreme hardship and risk to life that is caused by the lack of an up to date, properly resourced hospital in our area. Even the commissioners of the Southern DHB have described the current hospital as "woefully inadequate." Not only is the lack of decent medical facilities putting our rapidly growing population at risk, but also risks the welfare of the three million tourists who visit each year. We respectfully ask that you facilitate the urgent provision of a new hospital than can meet the extensive and increasing health needs of our region. Comments Name Location Date Comment Marnie Reid queenstown, 2018-07-09 I was at our dear wee hospital the other day... it still has the New Zealand same wallpaper from when my baby was born... 20 years ago!...and the same xray machine! jason chisholm Queenstown, 2018-07-09 The existing services are an embarrassment to our town. New Zealand Kate Maclean Queenstown, 2018-07-09 Well overdue New Zealand Ashley Murphy Queenstown, 2018-07-10 It will only take a major incident like the bus crash near the New Zealand Edith Cavell bridge in the past to highlight how incapable it really is. Let's help it get the exposure it needs! Hans Raetz Auckland, New 2018-07-10 We need some decent services.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste for Otago (The Omnibus Plan Change)
    Key Issues Report Plan Change 8 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago and Plan Change 1 to the Regional Plan: Waste for Otago (The Omnibus Plan Change) Appendices Appendix A: Minster’s direction matter to be called in to the environment court Appendix B: Letter from EPA commissioning the report Appendix C: Minister’s letter in response to the Skelton report Appendix D: Skelton report Appendix E: ORC’s letter in responding to the Minister with work programme Appendix F: Relevant sections of the Regional Plan: Water for Otago Appendix G: Relevant sections of the Regional Plan: Waste for Otago Appendix H: Relevant provisions of the Resource Management Act 1991 Appendix I: National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020 Appendix J: Relevant provisions of the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater 2020 Appendix K: Relevant provisions of the Resource Management (Stock Exclusion) Regulations 2020 Appendix L: Relevant provisions of Otago Regional Council Plans and Regional Policy Statements Appendix M: Relevant provisions of Iwi management plans APPENDIX A Ministerial direction to refer the Otago Regional Council’s proposed Omnibus Plan Change to its Regional Plans to the Environment Court Having had regard to all the relevant factors, I consider that the matters requested to be called in by Otago Regional Council (ORC), being the proposed Omnibus Plan Change (comprised of Water Plan Change 8 – Discharge Management, and Waste Plan Change 1 – Dust Suppressants and Landfills) to its relevant regional plans are part of a proposal of national significance. Under section 142(2) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA), I direct those matters to be referred to the Environment Court for decision.
    [Show full text]
  • The Queenstown Courier WINTER 2012 ISSUE No
    The Queenstown Courier WINTER 2012 ISSUE No. 87 THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE QUEENSTOWN & DISTRICT HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC CONTENTS P.2 Introducing Edith Cavell: A Bridge and Bravery by Danny Knudson P.3 Society News P.4 Brian Bayley, Honorary Life Member by Malcolm Boote P.5 Chairman Bill Dolan Departs by Brian Bayley P.6 Stories behind the 2012 Calendar Photographs: Cover: Cobb & Co Coaches by Marion Borrell July: The Macetown Road by Ben Saunders March: Buckingham Street, Arrowtown in 1905 by Malcolm Boote January 2013: The New Orleans Hotel, Arrowtown in 1901 by Marion Borrell This pamphlet accompanies the separately printed book shown on the cover: Edith Cavell: A Bridge and Bravery by committee member, Danny Knudson. The history of the Wakatipu has long held Danny Knudson‟s interests and he has recently investigated the bridge across the Shotover at Arthurs Point. The more information he uncovered, the more he became hooked on the story. The Edith Cavell Bridge is the fourth crossing at this site and it has an interesting history. It was the first in the South Island designed with a distinctive parabolic arch, it was built on top of an earlier bridge, and it was named in honour of a British nurse who never set foot in New Zealand. Locals may know that Edith Cavell was executed by an enemy firing squad for treason in World War I, but the full extent of her bravery deserves to be more widely appreciated. Details of her fortitude in rescuing allied soldiers and helping them escape from occupied Belgium, and her courage when facing certain death, enhanced British resolve at a time when inspiration was most needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Submitter Numbers
    Submitter Numbers Chapter 27 - Subdivision Submitter Number Submitter Name (Representative) 289 A Brown 691 Aaron and Rebecca Moody (John Edmonds + Associates Ltd) Alexander Kenneth & Robert Barry Robins & Robins Farm Limited (Tim Williams, Southern 594 Planning Group) 277 Alexander Reid 21 Alison Walsh 1242 Antony & Ruth Stokes 231 Antony Strain, Sarah Strain and Samuel Strain (Emma Dixon) 497/1255 Arcadian Triangle Limited (Warwick Goldsmith, Anderson Lloyd) 1256 Ashford Trust (Warwick Goldsmith, Anderson Lloyd) 635/1121 Aurora Energy Limited (Joanne Dowd, Delta Utility Services Limited) 166 Aurum Survey Consultants (Bruce McLeod) 430 Ayrburn Farm Estate Ltd (Amy Wilson-White, Brown & Company Planning Group Ltd) Banco Trustees Limited, McCulloch Trustees 2004 Limited, and others (Sam Buchan, 403 Graeme Todd GTODD LAW) 431 Barbara Kipke (Carey Vivian, Vivian + Espie Limited) 288 Barn Hill Limited 428 Barry Francis Ellis and Sandy Joan Ellis (Sam Buchan, Graeme Todd GTODD LAW) Bill & Jan Walker Family Trust c/- Duncan Fea (Trustee) and (Maree Baker 532/1259 Galloway/Warwick Goldsmith) 487 Blennerhassett Family (Carey Vivian, Vivian + Espie Limited) 271 Board of Airline Representatives of New Zealand (BARNZ) (John Beckett) 1102 Bob and Justine Cranfield 712 Bobs Cove Developments Limited (James Aoake, John Edmonds + Associates Ltd) Body Corporate 22362 (Sean McLeod, Chairman of Body Corporate 22362 on behalf of the 389 owners of 131 units in the Body Corporate) 541 Boundary Trust (Scott Freeman, Southern Planning Group) 1219 Bravo Trustee
    [Show full text]
  • Queenstown and Surrounds (Wakatipu Area)
    Community – Kea Project Plan Queenstown and Surrounds (Wakatipu area) Funded by: Department of Conservation – Community Fund (DOC-CF) Period: 1 December 2015 – 31 October 2017. Key contact person: Kea Conservation Trust – Tamsin Orr-Walker – [email protected]; Ph 0274249594 Aim The aim of the Community – Kea Project Plan is to i) facilitate long-term community kea conservation initiatives and ii) to change the way we think, act and live with kea in our communities. This will be actioned through development of collaborative Project Plans across the South Island. Each community plan will address concerns specific to the local community and threats to the resident kea population. Project Background This initial project plan outline has been developed as a result of discussions with communities during the Kea Conservation Trust’s (KCT) Winter Advocacy Tour - 20 July – 3 August 2015. The tour was funded by Dulux and supported by Department of Conservation (DOC). The tour theme, “Building a future with kea”, aimed to promote a new MOU between communities and kea. This initiative is in line with the new Strategic Plan for Kea Conservation (refer attached draft document), objective 3: to i) increase positive perceptions of kea and reduce conflict and ii) facilitate formation of community led kea conservation initiatives. Local Community – Kea Project Plans will be activated by two Community Engagement Coordinator’s (CEC’s) based in the following areas: 1) Upper half of the South Island: Northern region (Nelson/ Motueka/ Kahurangi), Central North (Nelson Lakes/ Murchison/Arthur’s Pass/Christchurch/Mt Hutt) and upper West Coast (Greymouth and Hokitika).
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Consent Applications Received for the Queenstown Lakes District
    RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATIONS RECEIVED FOR THE QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL INFORMATION SERVICE Private Bag 50072 QUEENSTOWN 9348 T: 03 441 0499 F: 03 450 2223 [email protected] www.qldc.govt.co.nz © Copyright 01.07.18 - 31.07.18 RC NO APPLICANT & PROPOSAL ZONE STATUS ET060010 STREAT DEVELOPMENTS LTD - EXTENSION OF TIME - APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME PURSUANT TO S125 OF THE RESOURCE RRES Formally Received MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 TO EXTEND THE LAPSE DATE OF RM060010 BY FIVE YEARS AT DOMAIN ROAD, HAWEA FLAT ET070267 J S WATERSTON - EXTEND THE LAPSE DATE OF RESOURCE CONSENT RM070267 BY FIVE (5) YEARS UNDER SECTION 125 OF THE RG Decision Issued RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 (RMA) AT 215 TUCKER BEACH ROAD, WAKATIPU BASIN RM170039 JONE CONTRACTING QUEENSTOWN LIMITED - APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 88 OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 (RMA) FOR RG Decision Issued LAND USE CONSENT TO INSTALL A 10,000 LITRE DIESEL TANK, AND FOR THE ERECTION OF STORAGE BUILDINGS FOR AN ASSOCIATED SERVICE ACTIVITY AT 37 ARROW JUNCTION ROAD, QUEENSTOWN RM171500 SOUTHERN FORTUNE COMPANY LIMITED - LAND USE CONSENT IS SOUGHT TO ESTABLISH VISITOR ACCOMMODATION ACTIVITY WITHIN HD Formally Received RESIDENTIAL UNITS AT 69 AND 71 HALLENSTEIN STREET FOR UP TO 365 NIGHTS PER CALENDER YEAR, AND UP TO 28 GUEST PER NIGHT AT 69 AND 71 HALLENSTEIN STREET, QUEENSTOWN RM180514 C & A TAYLER - LAND USE CONSENT TO CONSTRUCT A RESIDENTIAL UNIT AND ACCESSORY BUILDING WITH ASSOCIATED ROADING, RG Public Notification LANDSCAPING AND EARTHWORKS AT 87 KINGSTON
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Renters Survey Questions
    The Renters Survey 2020 is being conducted by the Queenstown Lakes Community Housing Trust. This survey is conducted every three years, so that we can examine the challenges faced by those who are renting in our community, for decent secure and affordable housing in the Queenstown Lakes District (which is Queenstown and Wanaka). This year, the Renters Survey will also provide valuable information about the impact COVID-19 lockdown has had on our renting community. Your participation will provide valuable information that helps us to make decisions about affordable housing that supports the needs of our community. THIS SURVEY IS COMPLETELY CONFIDENTIAL. The survey will be anonymised and no personal identifying information will be used in the findings. The survey will take around 10 to 15 minutes to complete, but we've kept it simple with multi choice questions. In appreciation of your time to complete the survey, you have the opportunity to go into the draw for one of eight $150 Prezzie Cards. Please forward the survey link on to anyone you know who is renting in the Queenstown Lakes area. The more people we have completing the survey, the better picture we can build. Thank you so much for taking the time to complete this survey and we look forward to receiving your feedback. ABOUT YOU * 1. How old are you? Under 20 years 20 to 29 years 30 to 39 years 40 to 49 years 50 to 59 years 60 to 64 years 65 years and over * 2. What is your gender? Male Female Gender diverse Prefer not to say * 3.
    [Show full text]