DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 26 Historic Heritage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 26 Historic Heritage Chapter 26 Historic Heritage This table identifies provisions subject to and consequentially affected by appeals: Provision Subject To Appeal Appellant Consequentially Affected Provisions (identified in red text in the relevant chapter/s) Court Number Section 26.2.1 Real Journeys Limited ENV-2018-CHC-131 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga ENV-2018-CHC-070 Policy 26.3.2.1.d Real Journeys Limited Rule 26.5.2 ENV-2018-CHC-131 Policy 26.3.3.1 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga ENV-2018-CHC-070 Policy 26.3.4.5 New Zealand Tungsten Mining Limited ENV-2018-CHC-151 Rule 26.5.8 Real Journeys Limited Policy 26.3.1.4, Section 26.8.1 ENV-2018-CHC-131 Section 26.8 (Reference No 67) Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga ENV-2018-CHC-070 Rule 26.10.9.1 New Zealand Tungsten Mining Limited Section 26.10.8 ENV-2018-CHC-151 Rule 26.10.9.2 New Zealand Tungsten Mining Limited Section 26.10.8 ENV-2018-CHC-151 Rule 26.10.9.3 New Zealand Tungsten Mining Limited Section 26.10.8 ENV-2018-CHC-151 This table identifies new provisions sought to be added: Appellant Provision/s Sought to be Added into Chapter 26 Court Number Heritage New Zealand Pouhere The following heritage features be reinstated into the Plan in Schedule 26.8: Taonga • 700 Māori Ti Pits and paved area. Between Dart Bridge and Kowhai Creek true right bank of Dart River below road ENV-2018-CHC-070 • 705 Sawmill Settlements Turners Creek - Kinloch Road Mill Creek • 706 Suspended Pipe Syphon in Stoney Creek • 707 Mining Tunnel Oxenbridge Tunnel • 708 Lime Kilns and Manager’s residence Bobs Cove • 709 Gold Mining - All relics in Twelve Mile Creek • 710 Arrowtown Chinese Settlement Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Include the following legal description for the Heritage Feature 705 (Sawmill Settlements Turners Creek - Kinloch Road Taonga Mill Creek: ENV-2018-CHC-070 Pt Recreation Reserve C, Blk II Upper Wakatipu SD (NZ Gazette 1891 p.790 ), Otago Land District Heritage New Zealand Pouhere The following heritage features be included in Schedule 26.8: Taonga • Description: Wong Gong’s Terrace Historic Area ENV-2018-CHC-070 Legal Description: Pt Run 27 (CT OTA2/1228) HNZ Cat/No: Historic Area/7549 • Description: Sew Hoy’s Big Beach Claim Historic Area Legal Description: Legal River HNZ Cat/No: Historic Area/7545 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere In Section 26.8 (Ref No 34), include the following in the HNZ Cat/No. column: 2 / 5603 & 5604 Taonga ENV-2018-CHC-070 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere In Section 26.8 (Ref No 87), include the following in the HNZ Cat/No. column: 2/2339 Taonga ENV-2018-CHC-070 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere In Section 26.8 (Ref No 140), include the following in the HNZ Cat/No. column: 1 / 5601 Taonga ENV-2018-CHC-070 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Amend the reference to the Schedule 26.8 to be consistent and correct throughout the plan. Taonga ENV-2018-CHC-070 Note: the annotations in this chapter reflect the Council’s interpretation of the provisions affected by appeals. E 26.1 Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to promote the sustainable management of the District’s historic heritage1 features. These features are ERITAg an important part of the amenity and character of our natural, physical and cultural heritage. Protecting these helps retain the District’s h character, history, and sense of place. This will be achieved by identifying and recognising heritage values, which can then be offered protection through the Plan. This chapter contains objectives, policies and rules relating to: ISTORIC ISTORIC a. the Inventory of protected heritage Features, which includes all listed buildings, structures, and other features; h 26 b. heritage Precincts; c. sites of significance to Maori; d. heritage Overlay Areas. APPEALS VERSION 26.2 Identification and Protection 26.2.1 Categorisation and future listing The District’s most significant known heritage features are represented in the Inventory of Protected heritage Features. Although they all have heritage value, they are categorised according to their relative level of importance which allows different levels of regulatory protection to be applied. For heritage features there are three categories: 1 to 3, with Category 1 being the most significant. PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN [PART FIVE] Queenstown Lakes District Council acknowledges that the Inventory represents an identification and categorisation of heritage features QLDC at the time this plan was reviewed and may subsequently change. Nominations for inclusions, removals or amendments to categories for individual features will be considered, but should contain sufficiently detailed and robust reports in line with assessments that the Council uses. Evidence that affected owners have been informed and consulted should be provided and: a. for heritage precincts and heritage Overlay Areas, a report from a qualified a conservation / landscape architect or a person with demonstrated experience as an adviser or manager on projects involving heritage precincts or areas, is recommended. These may include site specific reports from government bodies with a remit for heritage, such as heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga and the Department of Conservation; b. for sites of significance to Maori, a detailed assessment of the extent of the site and related values should be prepared by the appropriately mandated iwi; c. for individual buildings and structures, a report from a suitably qualified conservation architect, using the Council’s criteria, and for Category 1 features, a Conservation Plan. Any Conservation Plan shall be prepared in accordance with heritage New Zealand’s Best Practice guidelines; d. for sites that require the use of archaeological methods, a detailed assessment by a qualified and experienced archaeologist. Section 26.2.1 and relief sought Appellant Consequentially Court Number Affected Provisions Amend section 26.2.1 to delete requirement for “a report from an appropriately Real Journeys Limited qualified and experienced conservation / landscape architect“ or amend ENV-2018-CHC-131 provision to clarify precisely what an “appropriately qualified and experienced conservation / landscape architect” entails. Amend section 26.2.1(c): Heritage New Zealand Pouhere for individual buildings and structures, a report from a suitably qualified Taonga conservation architect, using the Council’s criteria, and for Category 1 features, ENV-2018-CHC-070 a Conservation Plan is encouraged. Any Conservation Plan shall be prepared in accordance with heritage New Zealand’s Best Practice guidelines; 26.2.2 Description of listed heritage Features Categories 1 – 3 Category 1 Category 1 heritage Features warrant the highest level of protection as they are very significant nationally or regionally. Category 1 shall include all places of the highest historical or cultural heritage significance including, but not limited to, all features in Category 1 of the heritage New Zealand ‘New Zealand heritage List/ Rarangi Kohero’. Category 2 Category 2 heritage Features warrant permanent protection because they are very significant to the District and/or locally. Category 3 Category 3 heritage Features are significant to the District and/or locally and their retention is warranted. The Council will be more flexible regarding significant alterations to heritage features in this Category. Category 3 E ERITAg h ISTORIC h shall include all other places of special historical or cultural value. 26 26.2.3 Evaluation APPEALS VERSION Development affecting historic heritage can be a complex matter because of the sensitivity of the values associated with them. The evaluation criteria contained in this section 26.6.1 of this chapter shall form the basis of any ‘Assessment of Effects’ on activities affecting heritage features. Early consultation on development proposals is recommended with heritage professionals, heritage New Zealand and community heritage groups, before the design stage. 26.2.4 Archaeology Alert Layer The hNZPTA 2014 makes it unlawful to destroy or modify the whole or part of an archaeological site without the prior authority of heritage PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN [PART FIVE] New Zealand. This is a separate statutory process to obtaining any resource consents required under this District Plan, but is an important QLDC step for applicants to consider when preparing a resource consent application which might affect an archaeological site. An archaeological site is defined in the hNZPTA 2014 and is also included in the list of definitions under Section 26.6. given the large number of archaeological sites within the District, they are not shown on the Planning Maps. however to assist prospective applicants, an alert layer is maintained by the Council which identifies particularly significant groups of sites or significant sites of unknown extent. This layer is for information purposes only, and users of the Plan are recommended to undertake early consultation with heritage New Zealand. This alert layer does not necessarily contain all archaeological sites but is intended to provide applicants with an easily accessible means of undertaking an initial check of the subject site. The alert layer will be updated as new information is made available to the Council. It does not form part of the District Plan Planning Maps. 26 – 3 E 26.3 Objectives and Policies 26.3.1 Objective - The District’s historic heritage is recognised, protected, ERITAg h maintained and enhanced. Policies 26.3.1.1 Ensure historic heritage features within the District that warrant protection are recognised in the Inventory of Protected Features in Section 26.8. ISTORIC ISTORIC h 26.3.1.2 To enhance historic heritage through: 26 a. increasing the knowledge and understanding of heritage values; b. providing for the enhancement of heritage values through works which increase the resilience of heritage features by way of repairs and upgrades to meet building and safety standards, subject to these works being undertaken in a manner which respects heritage values and where possible retains original heritage APPEALS VERSION fabric or utilises the same or similar materials.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Section and Level Crossing All Located Within a Short Section of Highway
    2018 update of the Otago Southland Regional Land Transport Plans 2015-2021 Descriptions of prioritised activities and projects for 2018-21 The committees have prioritised the larger projects into two priority bands, taking into account the benefits that each project would help realise, whether it forms part of an integrated programme of works for a particular area, and whether it is of inter-regional significance. Projects for which insufficient information is available to judge how the results will align with RLTP strategy are included in the lower priority band; this applies to a suite of NZTA safety projects for Otago that are in the 2018 Transport Agency Investment Plan. Integrated programmes of work are kept within a single prioritisation category, since all projects within such a programme need to be implemented in order to realise the anticipated benefits. Priority One projects – Southland NZTA Project Name: SH 1 - Edendale Realignment Item No 19 & 23 Organisation NZTA Project Funding $13,178,058 Project Years 2015 to 2018 Project description Issues with variations in the speed limits through the Edendale township and a right-angled bend with an adjacent intersection and level crossing all located within a short section of highway. Any expansion of Fonterra’s plant will generate additional traffic, which will travel past residential properties and a school. The project will provide a bypass to the township, with appropriate connections to the Fonterra plant. Reason for priority Benefits safety, also network performance and capability, and regional development. The project improves safety for vehicles and other road users within the Edendale township.
    [Show full text]
  • LWB Issue 760.Indd
    GUIDEGIG LAKES WEEKLY PAGE 15 21st Jul - 27th BULLETIN FIRST ON THE STREET No 760 WWW.LWB.CO.NZ • BUY • ACCOMMODATION • SELL • INFORMATION • JOBS • [email protected] Boom Scandal Gone I suppose 3 different MP’s in as many terms of government is par for the course in some electorates. Those contestable seats that fl ip and fl op from Labour to National and back again. But here in the Clutha Southland, now Southland electorate we have been wrapped in the blue blanket of the National Party forever. Like it or not. I was excited when National chose a young progressive MP in Todd Barclay after Bill English went to the list. Not that I particularly care for National over Labour but because he was not a farmer. Maybe would give a hoot about the Wakatipu a tad more than Bill did, and that hope came to pass as Todd moved into the neighbourhood in Arrowtown. He spent time with the local business community and learnt what help we needed from central government. Then BOOM. Scandal and gone. Then along came Hamish Walker. Another likeable young bloke. Maybe a little more country than I would like but without a doubt a hard worker. He went into bat for all sorts of social, community and business-related concerns this huge and diverse electorate had. He was available at his Frankton offi ce, answered calls and things were looking up. Life is about building relationships and with Hamish, hopes were high that the Wakatipu #getbumped at the Queenstown Ice Arena in our all new Ice would have a long-term advocate.
    [Show full text]
  • Queenstown Lakes District Plan Review, Chapter 26: Historic Heritage
    DISTRICT PLAN REVIEW CHAPTER 26: HISTORIC HERITAGE SUBMISSION TO THE QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL 23 OCTOBER 2015 1. BACKGROUND TO IPENZ The Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand (IPENZ) is the lead national professional body representing the engineering profession in New Zealand. It has approximately 16,000 Members, and includes a cross-section of engineering students, practising engineers, and senior Members in positions of responsibility in business. IPENZ is non-aligned and seeks to contribute to the community in matters of national interest giving a learned view on important issues, independent of any commercial interest. As the lead engineering organisation in New Zealand, IPENZ has responsibility for advocating for the protection and conservation of New Zealand’s engineering heritage. IPENZ manages a Heritage Register and a Heritage Record for engineering items throughout New Zealand. The IPENZ Engineering Heritage Register has criteria and thresholds similar to Category 1 historic places on Heritage New Zealand’s New Zealand Heritage List/Rārangi Kōrero. Items on our Register have been assessed as being engineering achievements of outstanding or special heritage significance. IPENZ is still populating the Register. The IPENZ Engineering Heritage Record includes histories of industrial and engineering items around New Zealand, and is also subject to ongoing improvements and additions. 2. GENERAL COMMENTS 2.1 INTRODUCTION The scheduling of heritage places in the District Plans of local authorities is an important mechanism that IPENZ supports because of our objective of promoting the protection, preservation and conservation of New Zealand’s engineering heritage. The Queenstown Lakes District has a very rich heritage and in particular has a wealth of industrial and engineering heritages sites because of the area’s early mining, agricultural and pastoral history and its challenging topography.
    [Show full text]
  • Greetings, Dear Dr Clark, Please Find Attached the Petition Organised to Support a New Local H
    Crux Recipient: Dr David Clark Letter: Greetings, Dear Dr Clark, Please find attached the petition organised to support a new local hospital for the Queenstown Lakes and Central Otago districts. Not only has the petition been signed by over 5,000 people, but their comments document the sometimes extreme hardship and risk to life that is caused by the lack of an up to date, properly resourced hospital in our area. Even the commissioners of the Southern DHB have described the current hospital as "woefully inadequate." Not only is the lack of decent medical facilities putting our rapidly growing population at risk, but also risks the welfare of the three million tourists who visit each year. We respectfully ask that you facilitate the urgent provision of a new hospital than can meet the extensive and increasing health needs of our region. Comments Name Location Date Comment Marnie Reid queenstown, 2018-07-09 I was at our dear wee hospital the other day... it still has the New Zealand same wallpaper from when my baby was born... 20 years ago!...and the same xray machine! jason chisholm Queenstown, 2018-07-09 The existing services are an embarrassment to our town. New Zealand Kate Maclean Queenstown, 2018-07-09 Well overdue New Zealand Ashley Murphy Queenstown, 2018-07-10 It will only take a major incident like the bus crash near the New Zealand Edith Cavell bridge in the past to highlight how incapable it really is. Let's help it get the exposure it needs! Hans Raetz Auckland, New 2018-07-10 We need some decent services.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste for Otago (The Omnibus Plan Change)
    Key Issues Report Plan Change 8 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago and Plan Change 1 to the Regional Plan: Waste for Otago (The Omnibus Plan Change) Appendices Appendix A: Minster’s direction matter to be called in to the environment court Appendix B: Letter from EPA commissioning the report Appendix C: Minister’s letter in response to the Skelton report Appendix D: Skelton report Appendix E: ORC’s letter in responding to the Minister with work programme Appendix F: Relevant sections of the Regional Plan: Water for Otago Appendix G: Relevant sections of the Regional Plan: Waste for Otago Appendix H: Relevant provisions of the Resource Management Act 1991 Appendix I: National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020 Appendix J: Relevant provisions of the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater 2020 Appendix K: Relevant provisions of the Resource Management (Stock Exclusion) Regulations 2020 Appendix L: Relevant provisions of Otago Regional Council Plans and Regional Policy Statements Appendix M: Relevant provisions of Iwi management plans APPENDIX A Ministerial direction to refer the Otago Regional Council’s proposed Omnibus Plan Change to its Regional Plans to the Environment Court Having had regard to all the relevant factors, I consider that the matters requested to be called in by Otago Regional Council (ORC), being the proposed Omnibus Plan Change (comprised of Water Plan Change 8 – Discharge Management, and Waste Plan Change 1 – Dust Suppressants and Landfills) to its relevant regional plans are part of a proposal of national significance. Under section 142(2) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA), I direct those matters to be referred to the Environment Court for decision.
    [Show full text]
  • The Queenstown Courier WINTER 2012 ISSUE No
    The Queenstown Courier WINTER 2012 ISSUE No. 87 THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE QUEENSTOWN & DISTRICT HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC CONTENTS P.2 Introducing Edith Cavell: A Bridge and Bravery by Danny Knudson P.3 Society News P.4 Brian Bayley, Honorary Life Member by Malcolm Boote P.5 Chairman Bill Dolan Departs by Brian Bayley P.6 Stories behind the 2012 Calendar Photographs: Cover: Cobb & Co Coaches by Marion Borrell July: The Macetown Road by Ben Saunders March: Buckingham Street, Arrowtown in 1905 by Malcolm Boote January 2013: The New Orleans Hotel, Arrowtown in 1901 by Marion Borrell This pamphlet accompanies the separately printed book shown on the cover: Edith Cavell: A Bridge and Bravery by committee member, Danny Knudson. The history of the Wakatipu has long held Danny Knudson‟s interests and he has recently investigated the bridge across the Shotover at Arthurs Point. The more information he uncovered, the more he became hooked on the story. The Edith Cavell Bridge is the fourth crossing at this site and it has an interesting history. It was the first in the South Island designed with a distinctive parabolic arch, it was built on top of an earlier bridge, and it was named in honour of a British nurse who never set foot in New Zealand. Locals may know that Edith Cavell was executed by an enemy firing squad for treason in World War I, but the full extent of her bravery deserves to be more widely appreciated. Details of her fortitude in rescuing allied soldiers and helping them escape from occupied Belgium, and her courage when facing certain death, enhanced British resolve at a time when inspiration was most needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Item Report Template
    IPENZ Engineering Heritage Record Report Shotover River Bridge, Lower Shotover Written by: Rebecca Ford and Karen Astwood Date: 15 February 2016 Bridge over the Shotover River in the Lower Shotover area, 1926. Godber, Albert Percy, 1875–1949: Collection of albums, prints and negatives. Ref: APG-1683-1/2-G. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. http://natlib.govt.nz/records/22806436 1 Contents A. General information ....................................................................................................... 3 B. Description .................................................................................................................... 5 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 5 Historical narrative ................................................................................................................ 5 Social narrative .................................................................................................................. 11 Physical narrative ............................................................................................................... 14 C. Assessment of significance .......................................................................................... 17 D. Supporting information .................................................................................................. 18 List of supporting documents...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Queenstown Integrated Transport Programme Business Case
    Approval ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Revision status* .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Template version................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Supporting documents .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Glossary of terms .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 2. PROGRAMME CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................................... 13 3. PARTNERS AND KEY STAKEHOLDERS .............................................................................................................. 40 4. STRATEGIC ASSESSMENTS – OUTLINING THE NEED FOR INVESTMENT ..................................................... 44 5. ALIGNMENT TO EXISTING STRATEGIES/ORGANISATIONAL GOALS
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Into the Wakatipu Basin Aquifers July 2014
    Investigation into the Wakatipu Basin Aquifers July 2014 Otago Regional Council Private Bag 1954, Dunedin 9054 70 Stafford Street, Dunedin 9016 Phone 03 474 0827 Fax 03 479 0015 Freephone 0800 474 082 www.orc.govt.nz © Copyright for this publication is held by the Otago Regional Council. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part, provided the source is fully and clearly acknowledged. ISBN 978-0-478-37673-9 Report writer: Jens Rekker, Resource Scientist Reviewed by: John Threlfall, Director of Environmental Science & Information Published July 2014 Investigation into the Wakatipu Basin Aquifers i Overview Background The Otago Region Council (ORC) is responsible for managing Otago’s water resources on behalf of the Crown and the community. The basin investigations that ORC conducts from time to time for the 20-plus groundwater areas around Otago are important building blocks in delivering informed water resource management. In recognition of population increase and land-use change in the Wakatipu Basin in the last 20 years, ORC saw the need for a fresh groundwater-resource investigation into its aquifers, including the Shotover floodplain and Frankton Terrace. Why is allocation of groundwater necessary? Compared to surface water, groundwater resources are not visible. Instances of the over- exploitation of groundwater elsewhere have caught communities by surprise, partly due to this lack of visibility. Signs of over-exploitation are hard to spot and occur gradually, often over decades. Placing a limit on the amount of groundwater that can be taken in any particular year, and implementing other controls, helps to prevent the resource from being outstripped.
    [Show full text]
  • QLDC & Community Associations Quarterly Catch Up
    QLDC & Community Associations Quarterly Catch Up - Minutes Date: Tuesday 25th February 2020 Time: 1:00pm – 3:00pm Location: QLDC Council Chambers, 10 Gorge Road and QLDC Office Wānaka, 47 Ardmore Street QLDC Attendees: NAME NAME NAME Ulrich Glasner (Chief Engineer) Jim Boult (Mayor) Briana Pringle (Parks & Open Spaces Planning Manager) Ben Greenwood (Roading Caroline Dumas (Senior Project Marie Day (Senior Community Operations and Contracts Manager, Project Management Liaison and Policy Advisor) Manager) Office) Andrew Strahan (Senior O&M Samantha Marsh (Parks Officer – Bill Nicoll (Organisation Project Manager) Volunteers/Community) Improvement Manager) Glyn Lewers (Councillor) Penny Clark (Councillor) Craig Ferguson (Councillor) Quentin Smith (Councillor) Calum McLeod (Councillor) Jess Mannix (EA to the GM Property & Infrastructure) Community Attendees: ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION Albert Town Community Association Arrowtown Village Association Arthurs Point Community Association Frankton Community Association Hāwea Community Association Kelvin Peninsula Community Association Lake Hayes Estate & Shotover Country Community Luggate Community Association Association AGENDA POINTS ACTION/WHO 1. Albert Town update: - Estimated time for construction of the TIF toilet is late April. Community input: - Albert Town Lagoon – it was noted that the drainage ditch under Alison Ave is blocked. Andrew to follow up and ensure clearing of the drain is scheduled to Andrew occur frequently. - The walking/cycle trail between SH6 and the Cardrona River was noted as being poor, and a potential safety hazard. Mayor Boult noted that this item would be discussed with the NZTA at the upcoming Transport Governance Group meeting. - The community noted that the Clutha River jet boat ban has been working well. - A key issue for the community is the Wanaka airport development, specifically the proposed flightpath and number of aircraft daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Frankton Flats Wakatipu Queenstown Town Centre
    PT3 CORONET PEAK SKIFIELD ARROWTOWN QT1 QT9 QT4 QT3 QT6 QT8 QT13 QT5 QT4 QT1 QT7 TO / FROM WANAKA & SKIFIELDS QT7 QT1 W2 TO / FROM CROMWELL FF7 LAKE HAYES ESTATE & SHOTOVER COUNTRY FF1 FF4 PT5 W3 FF2 FF5 PT2 FF3 FRANKTON AIRPORT FF6 FF8 PT4 PT3 THE REMARKABLES SKIFIELD TO / FROM MILFORD W1 TO / FROM GLENORCHY SHORT QUEENSTOWN TERM MEDIUM TERM LONG TERM 2015/16 – 2018/19 – 2024/25 2025/26 – 2044/45 TOWN CENTRE 2017/18 Arterial route improvements to improve the QT1 people moving capacity and trip reliability QT2 Walking & Cycling Audit and improvements WAKATIPU Hallenstein St Traffic flow (parking and signage QT3 changes) SH6A Intersection Improvements (Stanley/ QT4 Ballarat, Stanley/Shotover, Shotover/Camp and SHORT Shotover/Rees intersections SERVICES / INFRASTRUCTURE TERM MEDIUM TERM LONG TERM Services redesign scope QT5 Camp / Ballarat Intersection Improvement FRANKTON FLATS 2015/16 – 2018/19 – 2024/25 2025/26 – 2044/45 REDESIGN AREA WIDE 2017/18 QT6 Duke St two laning/shared space TRANSPORT FF1 Glenda Dr Roundabout & Local Rds Key pt visitor routes • Bus shelters Park St/Thompson St cycling connections (safe, QT7 convenient cycling routes to and through the FF2 Eastern Access Rd town centre) • Bus stop signage & information FF3 Grant Rd to Kawarau Falls Bridge QT8 Inner Links Key external routes • Area wide park ‘n’ ride facilities FF4 Grant Rd/SH6 intersection QT9 Operational parking changes FF5 SH6 – Hawthorne link NOT SHOWN ON THE MAP... PLANS FF6 Kawarau Falls Replacement Bridge QT10 Bike parking facilities in carparks FF7 Ladies
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-2045 Infrastructure Strategy
    Queenstown Lakes District Council 2015-2045 Infrastructure Strategy March 2015 CONTENTS 1.0 Background 2 2.0 Key Strategic Priorities 3 3.0 QLDC Context 3 3.1 Geographic Context 3 3.2 Demographic Context 5 4.0 Assumptions with Timing in Relation to Asset Management Plans and the Draft Long Term Plan 6 5.0 Data Confidence 7 6.0 Compliance with Local Government Act 8 7.0 Analysis of Capital Expenditure Drivers, Significant Infrastructure Issues and Risk 10 8.0 Major Projects Timeline (most likely future scenario) 32 9.0 Indicative Estimates and Key Assumptions of Projected Capital and Operating Expenditure 33 10.0 Infrastructure Investment Programme 33 10.1 Total Expenditure 33 10.2 Capital Expenditure Highlights 35 10.3 Major Water Supply Capital Works Programme Summary 38 10.4 Major Wastewater Capital Works Programme Summary 40 10.5 Major Stormwater Capital Works Programme Summary 42 10.6 Major Transport Capital Works Programme Summary 44 11.0 Summary 46 1 1.0 Background This document represents Queenstown Lake District Councils first 30-year strategy as required under the 2014 reforms to the Local Government Act 2002. This is an important document as Council seeks to continuously improve the provision of core services to the community. This document focuses on the core infrastructure services of: drinking water supplies, wastewater collection and treatment, stormwater management and discharge, roading and footpaths. Within this document, drinking water, wastewater and stormwater are sometimes referred to collectively as the ‘three‐waters’. As the primary water supplier to the district, Council is required to provide a supply of water to homes and business that is safe for human consumption.
    [Show full text]