DOCSLIB.ORG

The THOUGHTFUL CHRISTIAN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The THOUGHTFUL CHRISTIAN BY David S. Dockery David S. Dockery has been the president of Trinity International University (Deerfield, Illinois) since 2014, before which he served as president of Union University (Jackson, Tennessee) for more than 18 years. A recognized leader in Christian higher education across the United States, Dr. Dockery has spoken at more than 50 colleges, universities and seminaries, and has served on the boards of numerous organizations, including the CCCU (board chair from 2005–6), the International Association of Baptist Colleges and Universities, Christianity Today International (consulting editor for more than 20 years), the Prison Fellowship Ministries, and the Evangelical Theological Society (vice-president and president). He is the author or editor of more than 30 books, including his highly acclaimed Renewing Minds. Serving Church and Society through Christian Higher Education (2008). The Christ on Campus Initiative exists to inspire students on college and university campuses to think wisely, act with conviction, and become more Christ-like by providing relevant and excellent evangelical resources on contemporary issues. We aim to distribute resources—prepared by top evangelical scholars, pastors, and thinkers—that are intellectually rigorous, persuasive in argument, appealing in tone, and consistent with historic evangelical Christianity. The Christ on Campus Initiative is generously supported by the Carl F. H. Henry Center for Theological Understanding (a ministry of Trinity Evangelical Divinity School) and the MAC Foundation. This essay is Copyright © 2018 by Christ on Campus Initiative (CCI). Readers and organizations may circulate this and other CCI essays without charge. The THOUGHTFUL CHRISTIAN BY David S. Dockery As the workday concluded on read “be kind and compassionate to the Trinity campus prior to the one another” (Ephesians 4:32a). While Thanksgiving break, two students this understanding of “thoughtful” is visited my office with a bag full of an important aspect of the Christian delicious cookies. I thanked them for life, our primary focus in this essay has their kindness and their thoughtfulness, to do with thinking deeply or carefully reminding them how meaningful it or reflectively about things.1 In doing was for me that they would remember so, we will explore what it means those in the administration at this for thoughtful Christians to “think time of year. I then shared the cookies Christianly,” to love God with our with others on the hallway, who minds (Matthew 22:37).2 likewise expressed appreciation for my consideration and thoughtfulness. As I packed my briefcase to go to the Thoughtful Christians house, I included a new book that Seek to Love arrived on my desk that day. One of the endorsements on the back of that God with Heart, new book lauded the “wise insights to produce a lucid and thoughtful Soul, and Mind proposal.” Thoughtful in the first Becoming a thoughtful Christian instance describes a kind-hearted means learning to think well and remembrance. Thoughtful in the to think Christianly. And in noting second instance expands the description these two points, we want to say that to include the idea of being considerate. they must be both at once. Making The third usage points to the kind of this observation recognizes that it reflective thinking that is noteworthy is possible to be thoughtful without and commendable. being Christian, and that it is possible To describe someone as thoughtful to be a Christian without being may well suggest that this person is thoughtful. Frankly, in our current characteristically kind and considerate duality-promoting context, either of of others. Using the adjective in this these would be easier for most people manner would be quite consistent to contemplate. What is challenging with New Testament teaching. The is to be both thoughtful and Christian Apostle Paul told the Philippians to in vigorous and vital engagement with “consider others better than themselves” each other and interdependence among 3 (Philippians 2:3b). In Ephesians, we each other. We believe, however, that 3 such integration is precisely what is we live and love, the way we worship needed at this time in the church and in and serve, the way we work to earn our our culture.4 livelihood, the way we learn and teach. To be a thoughtful Christian does More than just new ideas and not mean that one only thinks about enhanced programs for churches and Christian matters, though the way one Christian organizations, the need of the thinks should be thoroughly shaped hour is for thoughtful Christ-followers by Christian teaching, the pattern who reflect distinctively Christian of Christian truth.5 In doing so, the thinking, the kind of serious-minded thoughtful Christian will explore a thinking that results in faithful wide, complex, and diverse range of engagement with the great ideas of topics, through the lens of the Christian history and the issues of our day.9 Such faith.6 Such exploration implies more thinking means seeing all of life and than being thoughtful about life in learning from a Christian vantage point, general, even by a person who claims to thinking shaped by the Christian faith.10 follow Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, Building on this brief introduction, for unfortunately, it is quite possible to which calls on thoughtful Christians to be a Christ-follower without thinking be Great Commandment Christians, let faithfully or consistently in Christian us turn our attention to the different categories. We also recognize that there areas or themes that characterize are times, even when we want to be thoughtful Christ-followers who seek thoughtful Christians that we, like the to love God with their minds. We will Apostle Paul, often do not do the good focus on themes that encourage and we want to do (Romans 7:14–16). Being help men and women become serious a thoughtful Christian then has more to about their Christian faith which will do with the intentional way we process help prepare them for the challenges ideas, issues, and information, learning and opportunities awaiting them in the to think in a Christian manner on a changing context of the twenty-first consistent basis. century. At this point, it will be helpful We certainly want to love God to explore eight larger categories that with our hearts and our souls. We we believe will help all of us understand must, however, as Christ-followers what is involved in learning to think who desire to be Great Commandment Christianly, while simultaneously Christians in line with the teaching strengthening our efforts to do so: of Jesus (Matthew 22:37–39) love God § Thoughtful Christians Seek to with our minds as well.7 Learning to be Connect Faith Thinking with the a thoughtful Christian, or, to express Unity of All Knowledge; it differently, to think in Christian § Thoughtful Christians Prioritize categories, will shape the way we think the Pattern of Christian Truth; about all aspects of life, whether we § Thoughtful Christians See the are talking about businesses, health Relationship Between the Pattern care agencies, governments, social of Christian Truth and Christian structures, recreational activities, and Worldview Development; yes, our homes and churches, too.8 To § Thoughtful Christians Affirm the be a thoughtful Christian means that we Enduring Authority of the Bible; seek to think differently about the way § Thoughtful Christians Recognize 4 To be a thoughtful Christian does not mean that one only thinks about Christian matters, though the way one thinks should be thoroughly shaped by Christian teaching, the pattern of Christian truth. 5 the Christian Intellectual notes, “This pursuit is an inevitable Tradition as a Valuable Resource; corollary of the existence of faith itself,” § Thoughtful Christians Emphasize for faith cannot help asking questions Reading and the Place of Cultural and seeking answers.11 Faith thinking, Engagement; which Hart describes as theologically § Thoughtful Christians informed thinking, is not reserved for a Underscore the Importance of small number of academic theologians, Faithful Christian Living and but is an inevitable consequence of the Character Formation; life of thoughtful Christians in the real § Thoughtful Christians Envision world. The large majority of Christians Ongoing Service in the Church, to will not become scholars or public the Culture, and for the World. intellectuals, nor will they necessarily become academic theologians or pastor- theologians. It would, however, be our Thoughtful Christians dream for all thoughtful Christians to Connect Faith be able to think Christianly, to think in theological categories, and to do so in Thinking with a way that strengthens opportunities with friends, neighbors, co-workers, the Unity of All and family members for the kind Knowledge of conversations that Chuck Colson 12 Thoughtful Christians who seek to described as “backyard apologetics.” follow Jesus Christ in a wholehearted Both Trevor Hart and Alvin manner begin with what some have Plantinga affirm that thoughtful called “faith thinking.” As Trevor Hart Christians need to articulate a Thoughtful Christians who seek to follow Jesus Christ in a wholehearted manner begin with what some have called “faith thinking.” 6 conception of the rational process that God’s revelation to us as we contemplate recognizes the need for intellectual God and his creation. In doing so, we responsibility in Christian belief.13 recall Augustine’s model of faith seeking They recognize,
Recommended publications
  • Memorials 2005

    Memorials 2005

    Scholars Crossing SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations 3-2005 Memorials 2005 James A. Borland Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/sor_fac_pubs Recommended Citation Borland, James A., "Memorials 2005" (2005). SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations. 58. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/sor_fac_pubs/58 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JETS 48/1 (March 2005) 213–20 MEMORIALS gleason leonard archer, jr. Gleason Leonard Archer, Jr. was born on May 22, 1916, in Norwell, MA, the third child of Elizabeth (Snyder) and Gleason Archer, Sr. His older sib- lings were a brother, Allen, and a sister, Marion. Gleason grew up in Boston and attended Boston Latin School. His father founded the Suffolk University Law School in Boston where the family lived during the school year, retreat- ing to Norwell during the summers. Gleason’s mother was a Christian, a member of the Park Street Church, and he came to know Christ at an early age through her influence. Gleason attended Harvard College and received his B.A. degree in 1938, followed in 1939 by his LL.B. degree from Suffolk University Law School in Boston. His took his A.M. degree from Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in 1940, and his Ph.D. from the same institution in 1944. He grad- uated with his Bachelor of Divinity from Princeton Theological Seminary the following year.
  • An Examination of Three Recent Philosophical Arguments Against Hierarchy in the Immanent Trinity

    An Examination of Three Recent Philosophical Arguments Against Hierarchy in the Immanent Trinity

    “A profoundly insightful book.” –Sam Storms, Lead Pastor for Preaching and Vision, Bridgeway Church, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma One GodOne in Three Persons Unity of Essence, Distinction of Persons, Implications for Life How do the three persons of the Trinity relate to each other? Evangelicals continue to wrestle with this complex issue and its implications for our understanding of men’s and women’s roles in both the home and the church. Challenging feminist theologies that view the Trinity as a model for evangelical egalitarianism, One God in Three Persons turns to the Bible, church history, philosophy, and systematic theology to argue for the eternal submission of the Son to the Father. Contributors include: WAYNE GRUDEM JOHN STARKE One God CHRISTOPHER W. COWAN MICHAEL A. G. HAYKIN KYLE CLAUNCH PHILIP R. GONS JAMES M. HAMILTON JR. ANDREW DAVID NASELLI ROBERT LETHAM K. SCOTT OLIPHINT in Three MICHAEL J. OVEY BRUCE A. WARE WARE & STARK E Persons BRUCE A. WARE (PhD, Fuller Theological Seminary) is professor of Christian theology at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He has written numerous journal articles, book chapters, book reviews, and books, including God’s Lesser Glory; God’s Greater Glory; Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; and The Man Christ Jesus. JOHN STARKE serves as preaching pastor at Apostles Church in New York City. He and his wife, Jena, have four children. Edited by BRUCE A. WARE & JOHN STARKE THEOLOGY ISBN-13: 978-1-4335-2842-2 ISBN-10: 1-4335-2842-8 5 2 1 9 9 9 7 8 1 4 3 3 5 2 8 4 2 2 U.S.
  • Chapter One Recent Developments in the Doctrine of Scripture D

    Chapter One Recent Developments in the Doctrine of Scripture D

    CHAPTER ONE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE DOCTRINE OF SCRIPTURE D. A. Carson .......tr ___________ ~ CHAPTER ONE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE DOCTRINE OF SCRIPTURE The pattern of Christian thought that emerged from the Reforma­ tion is often summed up under the three phrases: sola gratia, sola fides, and sola Scriptura. When I was a boy! I sometimes wondered how logic could be preseIVed if there were three statements each claiming that something or other was "sola"; but in due course I learned that grace is the sole ground of salvation! faith is the sole means of salvation! and the Scriptures are the sole ultimate authority for faith and life-all set in the context of the polemics of the Reformation period. Precisely because the Reformers' theological formulations were shaped by the controversies of their age! it is clear that the "faith and life" formula was meant to be an all-embracing rubric! not a limiting one. They claimed that the deposit of truth lies in the Bible! not in the church or in the magisterium of the church. Their concern! in other words! was to spell out the locus of authority in order to rebut their Roman Catholic opponents! not to restrict the range of the Bible's authority to religious life and thought! away from history and the natural world.l The modern disjunction would have seemed strange to them. This side of the EnlightenmenC debate over the Scriptures soon moved on to broader matters. Although the history of these debates has been chronicled many times!2 a great deal of detailed work still needs to be done.
  • Must Satan Be Released

    Must Satan Be Released

    0.44 in. TMSJ Cover 2013 Spring_Layout 1 4/30/2013 12:25 PM Page 1 The Master’s Seminary Journal The Master’s The Master’s CollegeandSeminary The Master’s THE MASTER’S SEMINARY JOURNALTHE MASTER’S SEMINARY 24, NO. 1 VOL. SPRING 2013 Sun Valley, CA 91352-3798 Valley, Sun 13248 RoscoeBlvd. Volume 24, Number 1 • Spring 2013 Have They Found a Better Way? An Analysis of Gentry and Wellum’s, Kingdom through Covenant Michael J. Vlach Three Searches for the “Historical Jesus” but No Biblical Christ (Part 2): Evangelical Participation in the Search for the “Historical Jesus” ADDRESS SERVICEREQUESTED ADDRESS F. David Farnell Did God Fulfill Every Good Promise? Toward a Biblical Understanding of Joshua 21:43–45 (Part 2) Gregory H. Harris Repentance Found? The Concept of Repentance in the Fourth Gospel David A. Croteau The Question of Application in Preaching: The Sermon on the Mount as a Test Case Bruce W. Alvord Permit. No.99Permit. Van Nuys,CA Van U.S. Postage Organization Non-Profit PAID THE MASTER’S SEMINARY JOURNAL published by THE MASTER’S SEMINARY John MacArthur, President Richard L. Mayhue, Executive Vice-President and Dean Edited for the Faculty: William D. Barrick John MacArthur Irvin A. Busenitz Richard L. Mayhue Nathan A. Busenitz Alex D. Montoya Keith H. Essex Bryan J. Murphy F. David Farnell Kelly T. Osborne Paul W. Felix Andrew V. Snider Michael A. Grisanti Dennis M. Swanson Gregory H. Harris Michael J. Vlach Matthew W. Waymeyer by Richard L. Mayhue, Editor Michael J. Vlach, Executive Editor Dennis M. Swanson, Book Review Editor Garry D.
  • The Inerrancy and Authority of Scripture in Christian Apologetics

    The Inerrancy and Authority of Scripture in Christian Apologetics

    The Journal of Ministry & Theology 50 The Inerrancy and Authority of Scripture in Christian Apologetics Lee Allen Anderson Jr. INTRODUCTION Scripture’s call to Christians to engage in the apologetic task is markedly obvious. For example, 1 Peter 3:15 instructs believers to always be “ready to make a defense (ἀπολογίαν) to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you.” Similarly, Jude 3 exhorts Christians to “contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all handed down to the saints.” Here, the “faith” refers not to the subjective element of personal trust in the Lord God, but instead to that “body of truth that very early in the church’s history took on a definite form,” that is, the content of Christian faith—doctrinal truth (cf. Gal 1:23; 1 Tim 4:1).1 Implicit in this verse, therefore, is the acknowledgment of the fact that a certain body of doctrinal truth exists, which in turn implies a source or origin for that doctrinal truth. For the Christian, the principle, authoritative source of doctrinal truth is the “God-breathed” holy Scriptures (2 Tim 3:16). The reliability of Scripture as a standard for Christian doctrine hinges on the fact that, as the inspired word of the true God who does not lie (Num 23:19; Titus 1:2; Heb 6:18), it is wholly true (Ps 119:160; John 17:17). To echo the words of the longstanding affirmation of the Evangelical Theological Society, “The Bible alone, and the Bible in its entirety, is the Word of God written and is therefore inerrant in the autographs.”2 This affirmation is not a peripheral issue to Christian theology; it is germane to the life of the church and, of logical consequence, the upholding of the Christian faith.
  • The Rapture in Twenty Centuries of Biblical Interpretation

    The Rapture in Twenty Centuries of Biblical Interpretation

    TMSJ 13/2 (Fall 2002) 149-171 THE RAPTURE IN TWENTY CENTURIES OF BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION James F. Stitzinger Associate Professor of Historical Theology The coming of God’s Messiah deserves closer attention than it has often received. The future coming of the Messiah, called the “rapture,” is imminent, literal and visible, for all church saints, before the hour of testing, premillennial, and, based on a literal hermeneutic, distinguishes between Israel and the church. The early church fathers’ views advocated a sort of imminent intra- or post- tribulationism in connection with their premillennial teaching. With a few exceptions, the Medieval church writers said little about a future millennium and a future rapture. Reformation leaders had little to say about prophetic portions of Scripture, but did comment on the imminency of Christ’s return. The modern period of church history saw a return to the early church’s premillennial teaching and a pretribulational rapture in the writings of Gill and Edwards, and more particularly in the works of J. N. Darby. After Darby, pretribulationism spread rapidly in both Great Britain and the United States. A resurgence of posttribulationism came after 1952, accompanied by strong opposition to pretribulationism, but a renewed support of pretribulationism has arisen in the recent past. Five premillennial views of the rapture include two major views—pretribulationism and posttribulation-ism—and three minor views—partial, midtribulational, and pre-wrath rapturism. * * * * * Introduction The central theme of the Bible is the coming of God’s Messiah. Genesis 3:15 reveals the first promise of Christ’s coming when it records, “He shall bruise you on the head, And you shall bruise him on the heel.”1 Revelation 22:20 unveils the last promise when it records “He who testifies to these things says, ‘Yes, I am coming quickly,’ Amen.
  • Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction Du Branch Patrimoine De I'edition

    Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction Du Branch Patrimoine De I'edition

    A MONERGISTIC THEOLOGICAL ACCOUNT OF MORAL EVIL by C. Elmer Chen A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of PROVIDENCE THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-37195-4 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-37195-4 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation. reproduced without the author's permission.
  • Christian Ethics

    Christian Ethics

    “Wayne Grudem and I have always been on the same page, both in theology and in theological method. Christian Ethics: An Introduction to Biblical Moral Reasoning has all the excellent features of his Systematic Theology : biblical fidelity, comprehensiveness, clarity, practical application, and interaction with other writers. His exhortations drive the reader to worship the triune God. I hope the book gets the wide distribution and enthusiastic response that it deserves.” John Frame, Professor of Systematic Theology and Philosophy Emeritus, Reformed Theological Seminary, Orlando, Florida “This work by Wayne Grudem is the best text yet composed in biblical Christian ethics, and I mean that several ways. It is more comprehensive, more insightful, and more applicable than any comparable work and is sure to be a classroom classic. But what I like most is how Grudem unites a scholar’s mind with a disciple’s heart more committed to pleasing Christ than contem- poraries, and more zealous for strengthening the church than impressing the world.” Daniel R. Heimbach, Fellow, L. Russ Bush Center for Faith and Culture; Senior Professor of Christian Ethics, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary “Wayne Grudem has a rare gift in making complex theological and ethical concepts accessible. He also has encyclopedic knowledge and an organized, analytical mind. All this is fully evident in this important book, which provides an invaluable resource to both scholars and practitioners.” Peter S. Heslam, Senior Fellow, University of Cambridge; Director, Transforming Business “Wayne Grudem is a master at cutting into meaty intellectual topics, seasoning them, and serving them up in flavorful, bite-sized morsels for the ordinary person to savor and digest.
  • Humanity's Capacity to Apprehend Aesthetic Value

    Humanity's Capacity to Apprehend Aesthetic Value

    Submission Page Humanity’s Capacity to Apprehend Aesthetic Value as an Argument for God’s Existence To Fulfill the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Divinity Liberty University Walter Hurst Davis Sr. Read and Approved by: Chairperson: _ Dr. Dan Mitchell_______________________ Reader: _____Dr. Joseph Wooddell____________________ Reader: ______Dr. Samuel Smith_____________________ Date: ___May 6, 2016_________________ Liberty University Humanity’s Capacity to Apprehend Aesthetic Value as an Argument for God’s Existence A Dissertation Submitted to The Faculty of the Rawlings School of Divinity In Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Divinity by Walter Hurst Davis Sr. Lynchburg, VA May 2016 Copyright Page Copyright © 2016 Walter H. Davis Sr. All Rights Reserved ii Dedication To my faithful wife Dodie Mae Davis, my children and grandchildren, for their faithful endurance. I chose to endure the inconveniences of this process. They did not. iii Contents Preface ix Acknowledgements xi Abstract xiii Introduction 1 Clarifying the Role of Theistic Arguments 6 The Relevance of the Thesis 10 The Argument and Reasoning Methods 11 The Vital Relationship between Theology and Apologetics 12 The Place for this Study in Apologetics 15 The Plan for the Study 20 Chapter 1: A Defense of Abductive Reasoning in Light of Other Reasoning Methods 22 Deductive Reasoning 25 Hesitancy in Using Deductive Reasoning 26 Deciding Against the Use of Deduction 36 Inductive Reasoning 38 The Inductive Nature of the Evidential
  • How Far Beyond Chicago? Assessing Recent Attempts to Reframe the Inerrancy Debate — Jason S

    How Far Beyond Chicago? Assessing Recent Attempts to Reframe the Inerrancy Debate — Jason S

    Themelios 34.1 (2009): 26-49 How Far Beyond Chicago? Assessing Recent Attempts to Reframe the Inerrancy Debate — Jason S. Sexton — Jason Sexton is a licensed minister with the Evangelical Free Church of America and PhD candidate in Systematic Theology at The University of St. Andrews, Scotland. he doctrine of inerrancy has been a watershed issue among evangelicals in the West, perhaps now Tmore evident than ever.1 While the inerrancy debate never entirely dissipated from its last spell in the late 1970s and early 1980s, it recently surged to the forefront of discussions about an evan- gelical doctrine of Scripture both in North America and abroad. This transpired with recent events in the Evangelical Theological Society (hereafter, ETS) dealing with inerrancy2 and fresh publications of at least a dozen books, articles, and reviews.3 With this new rally, one might say that evangelicalism is 1 It was designated a “watershed” over three decades ago by Harold Lindsell, The Battle for the Bible (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1976), 26–27, and eight years later by Francis A. Schaeffer, The Great Evangelical Disaster (Wheaton: Crossway, 1984), 44. The degree of watershed was challenged early by Richard H. Bube, “Inerrancy Is/Is Not the Watershed of Evangeli- calism: None of the Above,” Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation 29 (March 1977): 46–47, who called for “revelational inerrancy,” asserting that the term “inerrancy” outlived its usefulness. Some, however, see the inerrancy debate as a watershed for other reasons—because of a “classically modern” view of truth that made inerrancy the “foundational Christian doctrine upon which all others depend.” Jeffery Stephen Oldfield, “The Word Became Text and Dwells Among Us? An Examination of the Doctrine of Inerrancy” (PhD thesis, University of St Andrews, 2007), 232–33.
  • Final Pdf ETS 2014

    Final Pdf ETS 2014

    INDEX OF PARTICIPANTS Adair, John A. .....................26 Bethancourt, Phillip R. ...54 Carroll R., M. Daniel ....... 57 Das, Andrew ....................... 58 Aernie, Jeffrey W. ...............34 Bignon, Guillaume ..... 21, 50 Carson, D. A. ......................65 Davidson, Richard M........31 Aling, Charles .................... 52 Billington, Clyde E. ..........44 Carter, Warren ................... 58 Davis, Richard Brian ........21 Allen, Michael .................... 52 Bingham, Jeffrey ................28 Casas, David ....................... 53 Davis Abdallah, Amy F. ...47 Allison, Gregg R. ..........8, 23, Bird, Michael F. .................30 Chamberlain, Paul............59 De Young, James B. ...........28 39, 56 Blaising, Craig ............ 22, 27, Chandler, William T. .22, 65 DelHousaye, John ............. 19 Allison, Justin L. ...............64 39, 48 Chang, Dongshin D. ........49 Dempster, Stephen ...........47 Anderson, Charity ............46 Blatchley, Andrew ............. 32 Chapman, David W. .........64 Derickson, Gary ................39 Anderson, Chip M. ...........40 Blazosky, Bryan ................. 63 Chase, Mitch ......................54 DeRouchie, Jason S. .........34 Anderson, Tawa ................. 43 Block, Daniel ................ 37, 58 Chatraw, Josh ..................... 63 Detweiler, Craig .................48 Andres, Michael ................64 Blois, Isaac ...........................55 Chisholm, Jr., Deuel, Dave ...................50, 57 Andrews, Max L. ................21 Bloom, John .......................
  • The Tough-Love Proposal: a Novel Theodicy Le Pham Thai

    The Tough-Love Proposal: a Novel Theodicy Le Pham Thai

    THE TOUGH-LOVE PROPOSAL: A NOVEL THEODICY LE PHAM THAI A doctoral thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the DEPARTMENT OF SYSTEMATIC AND HISTORICAL THEOLOGY FACULTY OF THEOLOGY AND RELIGION UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA PROMOTER: PROFESSOR JERRY PILLAY June 2020 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………………………ii DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY……………………………………………………………x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ……………………………………………………………………...xi SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………………...xii CHAPTER ONE: OVERVIEW AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY………………………...1 1.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………1 1.2 The Research Problem………………………………………………………………...6 1.3 Research Objectives…………………………………………………………………...7 1.4 Research Methodology………………………………………………………………..8 1.5 Delimitations of Study……………………………………………………………….12 1.6 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………...12 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………………………………14 2.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..14 2.2 Definitions of Terms…………………………………………………………………15 2.2.1 Definition of Evil……………………………………………………………….16 2.2.2 Definition of Moral Evil………………………………………………………..17 ii 2.2.3 Definition of Natural Evil……………………………………………………....18 2.2.4 Definition of Social Evil………………………………………………………..20 2.2.5 A Combination of Evils………………………………………………………...22 2.2.6 Definition of Suffering………………………………………………………….22 2.2.7 The Problems of Evil…………………………………………………………...24 2.3 The Logical Problem of Evil………………………………………………………....24 2.3.1 The Logical Argument………………………………………………………….24