DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Pdf ETS 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Pdf ETS 2014 INDEX OF PARTICIPANTS Adair, John A. .....................26 Bethancourt, Phillip R. ...54 Carroll R., M. Daniel ....... 57 Das, Andrew ....................... 58 Aernie, Jeffrey W. ...............34 Bignon, Guillaume ..... 21, 50 Carson, D. A. ......................65 Davidson, Richard M........31 Aling, Charles .................... 52 Billington, Clyde E. ..........44 Carter, Warren ................... 58 Davis, Richard Brian ........21 Allen, Michael .................... 52 Bingham, Jeffrey ................28 Casas, David ....................... 53 Davis Abdallah, Amy F. ...47 Allison, Gregg R. ..........8, 23, Bird, Michael F. .................30 Chamberlain, Paul............59 De Young, James B. ...........28 39, 56 Blaising, Craig ............ 22, 27, Chandler, William T. .22, 65 DelHousaye, John ............. 19 Allison, Justin L. ...............64 39, 48 Chang, Dongshin D. ........49 Dempster, Stephen ...........47 Anderson, Charity ............46 Blatchley, Andrew ............. 32 Chapman, David W. .........64 Derickson, Gary ................39 Anderson, Chip M. ...........40 Blazosky, Bryan ................. 63 Chase, Mitch ......................54 DeRouchie, Jason S. .........34 Anderson, Tawa ................. 43 Block, Daniel ................ 37, 58 Chatraw, Josh ..................... 63 Detweiler, Craig .................48 Andres, Michael ................64 Blois, Isaac ...........................55 Chisholm, Jr., Deuel, Dave ...................50, 57 Andrews, Max L. ................21 Bloom, John ........................ 38 Robert B. ..................... 19 Dever, Mark ........................65 Arav, Rami ..........................60 Blount, Douglas ................28 Choi, YunGab ..................... 25 Dew, Jr., James K. ........ 32, 44 Arbo, Matthew ...................45 Bock, Darrell ........ 19, 28, 42, Chute, Anthony ..................18 De Zago, Ed ........................34 Arbour, Benjamin H. ....... 32 48, 56 Clark, R. Scott ...................42 Dickson, John .................... 57 Armstrong, Jonathan J. ... 41 Boda, Mark J. .....................50 Clary, Erik M. ................18, 35 Dittmann, Eva ................... 25 Arnold, Clinton E. .............. 8 Bogosian, Chad ................. 43 Co, Adam.............................64 Doornbos, Gayle E. ..........28 Arnold, Brian J. ..................24 Borland, James A. .............. 22 Cochran, Greg....................24 Dougherty, Trent G. .........46 Arnold, Jonathan W. .........61 Bowald, Mark .....................26 Coe, John ....................... 30, 51 Draper, Mark ...................... 38 Attridge, Harold W. ..........56 Bowman Jr., Robert M. ....21, Cohick, Lynn ......................56 Dryden, Jeff ........................ 43 Aubert, Annette G. ...........29 28 Colanter, Eddie N. ............54 Duby, Steven J. ...................26 Austin, Michael ..................21 Boyer, Steven D. .................45 Cole, Robert ..................42, 51 Duesing, Jason G. ............. 53 Austin, Steven A. ............... 63 Branch, J. Alan ....................18 Coleman, Robert E. ..........26 Duncan, Ligon ................... 27 Auxier, John W. ............43, 47 Brand, Steele ...................... 53 Collin, James Henry .........60 Duncan, Philip T. .............62 Averbeck, Richard E. ..41, 50 Bray, Gerald .................. 27, 28 Collins, C. John .................48 Dunne, John Anthony ......33 Baggett, David ........19, 31, 43 Breshears, Gerry ................ 53 Collins, Nate ...................... 38 Durst, Rodrick ................... 53 Bailey, Mark ..................28, 38 Brown, Derek J. .................. 32 Compton, Jared ..................18 Easley, Kendell ...................62 Bailey, Richard A. ..............45 Brown, Paul J. .....................34 Compton, Bruce .................55 Eby, Patrick .........................20 Baker, Mary Patton .......... 43 Bruce, Dustin B. .................35 Conway, Mary L. ................ 19 Echevarria, Miguel ............35 Ballor, Jordan .....................59 Bruce, James E. .............19, 31 Conyers, Lamont T. ...........21 Elder, Nicholas A...............30 Bandy, Alan S. ...............51, 52 Bruno, Christopher R. ......18 Copan, Paul ........................44 Ellis, Brannon ....................44 Barker, Kit ...........................26 Bryan, David K. .................24 Copan, Victor .....................30 Ellis, Mark A. ...............33, 64 Barker, William D. ............ 57 Bunting, Harry ...................31 Coppedge, Allan ................20 Emerson, Matthew ............18 Barrett, Jordan P. ...............64 Burk, Denny ........................33 Coppenger, Mark ..............20 Erdel, Tim ...........................40 Barrett, Matthew M. ........40 Burkholder, Benjamin J. ..45 Cortez, Felix ....................... 43 Erickson, Michael E. ........ 38 Barrick, William ................48 Burris, David C. .................60 Cortez, Marc ..........30, 49, 59 Patterson, Dorothy Bartchy, Scott ......................61 Buschart, David ................. 27 Couser, Greg ....................... 32 Kelley ............................61 Basselin, Tim......................20 Buth, Randall ....................36 Covolo, Robert ...................20 Essex, Keith ........................29 66 Bateman IV, Herbert W. ... 39 Butler, Rex D. ..................... 41 Cowan, J. Andrew ..............34 Estes, Daniel .................39, 50 Baum, Armin .....................48 Butner, D. Glenn ...............65 Cox, Michael .......................35 Evans, John H. ...................47 Baxter, Jeff ........................... 37 Cable, Paul S................34, 44 Coyle, S. Cameron ............. 32 Evans, William B...............46 Beach, Lee ...........................54 Caldwell, Robert ......... 46, 62 Craig, William Lane ...44, 49 Falk, Darrel ........................ 32 Beale, Greg ....................41, 47 Calhoun, Jeffrey C. ...........65 Cramer, David C. ...............60 Fant, Gene ...........................39 Beck, W. David ....................21 Calhoun, Susanne ............ 23 Crisler, Channing L. ......... 63 Fantin, Joseph .................... 19 Beckwith, Francis J. .... 21, 43 Campbell, Curtis, Byron G. .................51 Farley, Michael .............37, 47 Belleville, Linda ...........50, 58 Constantine R. ..........36 Daeley, Justin J. ..................64 Faro, Ingrid ......................... 38 Berding, Kenneth .............. 32 Caneday, Ardel B. .............. 22 Dallaire, Helene .................36 Farris, Joshua Ryan ...........31 Bernius, Elaine ..................50 Card-Hyatt, Carsten .........59 Dalrymple, Rob ................. 52 Fay, Ron C. .......................... 63 Berry, Everett ......................64 Cardoza, Freddy ................36 Dalrymple, Timothy ........59 Feinberg, John ..............23, 56 EVANGELICAL THEOLOGICAL SOCIETY 66TH ANNUAL MEETING ECCLESIOLOGY INDEX OF PARTICIPANTS Finch, Candi ....................... 23 Grudem, Wayne .................65 Holm, Douglas .................. 22 Kennedy, Scott ...................29 Finn, Nathan A. ................46 Guest, Gene .................. 26, 33 Honeycutt, Willie ..............47 Key, Scott ..............................21 Firestone, Chris L. ............60 Guidero, Kirsten Laurel .. 38 Hong, Sunny ......................36 Kibbe, Michael ............ 20, 49 Fisher, Dennis .................... 37 Gundersen, David Horton, Michael S. .....30, 65 Kidd, Reggie ....................... 37 Fisher, Jeff ...........................62 Gunner ........................42 Hoselton, Luke R. ..............33 Kiel, Jonathan .....................55 Flannagan, Matthew ... 35, 60 Gundlach, Bradley J. ........29 Houck, Daniel Kierspel, Lars......................49 Ford, Coleman M. ..............33 Gurney, Michael L. ...........60 Whitman ....................65 Kilner, John F. .................... 37 Foreman, Mark W. ............ 43 Gurry, Peter J. .....................40 House, H. Wayne ............... 27 Kim, Chang Hoon ............24 Forster, Greg .......................45 Guthrie, George H. ...........34 House, Paul R. ........ 8, 45, 47 Kim, Dongsu ......................36 Fortson III, S. Donald ..... 38 Haarsma, Deborah ........... 32 Howard, Jr., David M. ......42 Kinzer, Mark ...................... 57 Foster, Tim .......................... 22 Haas, Guenther Gene ...... 22 Howard, Evan......................51 Klink III, Edward W. ........47 Fowler, Stanley K. .......25, 64 Habermas, Gary R. ......23, 31 Howe, Richard G. ...............21 Knight, Michelle ................35 Franke, John .......................39 Habets, Myk .......................49 Hugenberger, Gordon .......18 Kotter, David S. .................54 Franklin, Patrick S. ...........61 Hahne, Harry ...............50, 58 Huggins, Ronald V. ..........59 Krause, Mark S. ................. 63 Franks, W. Paul ...................21 Hall, David W. ..............23, 42 Ingolfsland, Dennis ......... 58 Kreider, Glenn ........28, 47, 62 Frantz, Gordon ..................44 Hall, Kevin ..........................65 Inman, Ross ........................21 Kuhn, Chase R. ..................54 Frederick, John ..................34 Hall, Matthew J. ................54 Irons, Charles Lee ............. 32 Kurka, Robert C. ............... 25 Freiberg, Bob .......................61 Hamilton Jr., James M. ....47 Jackson, Scott R. ................61 Kuruvilla, Abraham ...29, 38 Frey, Mathilde .................... 43 Hamm, Jeffery L. ...............26 Janeway, Brian .....................21
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Examination of Three Recent Philosophical Arguments Against Hierarchy in the Immanent Trinity
    “A profoundly insightful book.” –Sam Storms, Lead Pastor for Preaching and Vision, Bridgeway Church, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma One GodOne in Three Persons Unity of Essence, Distinction of Persons, Implications for Life How do the three persons of the Trinity relate to each other? Evangelicals continue to wrestle with this complex issue and its implications for our understanding of men’s and women’s roles in both the home and the church. Challenging feminist theologies that view the Trinity as a model for evangelical egalitarianism, One God in Three Persons turns to the Bible, church history, philosophy, and systematic theology to argue for the eternal submission of the Son to the Father. Contributors include: WAYNE GRUDEM JOHN STARKE One God CHRISTOPHER W. COWAN MICHAEL A. G. HAYKIN KYLE CLAUNCH PHILIP R. GONS JAMES M. HAMILTON JR. ANDREW DAVID NASELLI ROBERT LETHAM K. SCOTT OLIPHINT in Three MICHAEL J. OVEY BRUCE A. WARE WARE & STARK E Persons BRUCE A. WARE (PhD, Fuller Theological Seminary) is professor of Christian theology at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He has written numerous journal articles, book chapters, book reviews, and books, including God’s Lesser Glory; God’s Greater Glory; Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; and The Man Christ Jesus. JOHN STARKE serves as preaching pastor at Apostles Church in New York City. He and his wife, Jena, have four children. Edited by BRUCE A. WARE & JOHN STARKE THEOLOGY ISBN-13: 978-1-4335-2842-2 ISBN-10: 1-4335-2842-8 5 2 1 9 9 9 7 8 1 4 3 3 5 2 8 4 2 2 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One Recent Developments in the Doctrine of Scripture D
    CHAPTER ONE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE DOCTRINE OF SCRIPTURE D. A. Carson .......tr ___________ ~ CHAPTER ONE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE DOCTRINE OF SCRIPTURE The pattern of Christian thought that emerged from the Reforma­ tion is often summed up under the three phrases: sola gratia, sola fides, and sola Scriptura. When I was a boy! I sometimes wondered how logic could be preseIVed if there were three statements each claiming that something or other was "sola"; but in due course I learned that grace is the sole ground of salvation! faith is the sole means of salvation! and the Scriptures are the sole ultimate authority for faith and life-all set in the context of the polemics of the Reformation period. Precisely because the Reformers' theological formulations were shaped by the controversies of their age! it is clear that the "faith and life" formula was meant to be an all-embracing rubric! not a limiting one. They claimed that the deposit of truth lies in the Bible! not in the church or in the magisterium of the church. Their concern! in other words! was to spell out the locus of authority in order to rebut their Roman Catholic opponents! not to restrict the range of the Bible's authority to religious life and thought! away from history and the natural world.l The modern disjunction would have seemed strange to them. This side of the EnlightenmenC debate over the Scriptures soon moved on to broader matters. Although the history of these debates has been chronicled many times!2 a great deal of detailed work still needs to be done.
    [Show full text]
  • Must Satan Be Released
    0.44 in. TMSJ Cover 2013 Spring_Layout 1 4/30/2013 12:25 PM Page 1 The Master’s Seminary Journal The Master’s The Master’s CollegeandSeminary The Master’s THE MASTER’S SEMINARY JOURNALTHE MASTER’S SEMINARY 24, NO. 1 VOL. SPRING 2013 Sun Valley, CA 91352-3798 Valley, Sun 13248 RoscoeBlvd. Volume 24, Number 1 • Spring 2013 Have They Found a Better Way? An Analysis of Gentry and Wellum’s, Kingdom through Covenant Michael J. Vlach Three Searches for the “Historical Jesus” but No Biblical Christ (Part 2): Evangelical Participation in the Search for the “Historical Jesus” ADDRESS SERVICEREQUESTED ADDRESS F. David Farnell Did God Fulfill Every Good Promise? Toward a Biblical Understanding of Joshua 21:43–45 (Part 2) Gregory H. Harris Repentance Found? The Concept of Repentance in the Fourth Gospel David A. Croteau The Question of Application in Preaching: The Sermon on the Mount as a Test Case Bruce W. Alvord Permit. No.99Permit. Van Nuys,CA Van U.S. Postage Organization Non-Profit PAID THE MASTER’S SEMINARY JOURNAL published by THE MASTER’S SEMINARY John MacArthur, President Richard L. Mayhue, Executive Vice-President and Dean Edited for the Faculty: William D. Barrick John MacArthur Irvin A. Busenitz Richard L. Mayhue Nathan A. Busenitz Alex D. Montoya Keith H. Essex Bryan J. Murphy F. David Farnell Kelly T. Osborne Paul W. Felix Andrew V. Snider Michael A. Grisanti Dennis M. Swanson Gregory H. Harris Michael J. Vlach Matthew W. Waymeyer by Richard L. Mayhue, Editor Michael J. Vlach, Executive Editor Dennis M. Swanson, Book Review Editor Garry D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trinity Review
    THE TRINITY REVIEW For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war according to the flesh, for the weapons of our warfare [are] not fleshly but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ. And they will be ready to punish all disobedience, when your obedience is fulfilled. July, August 1993 Copyright 2003 John W. Robbins Post Office Box 68, Unicoi, Tennessee 37692 Email: [email protected] Website: www.trinityfoundation.org Telephone: 423.743.0199 Fax: 423.743.2005 An Introduction to Gordon H. Clark John W. Robbins Who Is Gordon Clark? Clark was a Presbyterian minister, and his father was a Presbyterian minister before him. Born in Carl Henry thinks Clark is "one of the profoundest urban Philadelphia in the summer of 1902, he died evangelical Protestant philosophers of our time." in rural Colorado in the spring of 1985. Clark was Ronald Nash has praised him as "one of the greatest educated at the University of Pennsylvania and the Christian thinkers of our century." He is a prolific Sorbonne. His undergraduate degree was in French; author, having written more than 40 books during his graduate work was in ancient philosophy. He his long academic career. His philosophy is the wrote his doctoral dissertation on Aristotle. He most consistently Christian philosophy yet quickly earned the respect of fellow professional published, yet few seminary students hear his name philosophers by publishing a series of articles in even mentioned in their classes, much less are academic journals, translating and editing required to read his books.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Garden of Eden to the New Creation in Christ : a Theological Investigation Into the Significance and Function of the Ol
    The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Theses 2017 From the Garden of Eden to the new creation in Christ : A theological investigation into the significance and function of the Old estamentT imagery of Eden within the New Testament James Cregan The University of Notre Dame Australia Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses Part of the Religion Commons COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further copying or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Do not remove this notice. Publication Details Cregan, J. (2017). From the Garden of Eden to the new creation in Christ : A theological investigation into the significance and function of the Old Testament imagery of Eden within the New Testament (Doctor of Philosophy (College of Philosophy and Theology)). University of Notre Dame Australia. https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses/181 This dissertation/thesis is brought to you by ResearchOnline@ND. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@ND. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FROM THE GARDEN OF EDEN TO THE NEW CREATION IN CHRIST: A THEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE SIGNIFICANCE AND FUNCTION OF OLD TESTAMENT IMAGERY OF EDEN WITHIN THE NEW TESTAMENT. James M. Cregan A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame, Australia. School of Philosophy and Theology, Fremantle. November 2017 “It is thus that the bridge of eternity does its spanning for us: from the starry heaven of the promise which arches over that moment of revelation whence sprang the river of our eternal life, into the limitless sands of the promise washed by the sea into which that river empties, the sea out of which will rise the Star of Redemption when once the earth froths over, like its flood tides, with the knowledge of the Lord.
    [Show full text]
  • Exegetical Fallacies: Common Interpretive Mistakes Every Student Must Avoid
    TMSJ 19/1 (Spring 2008) 15-27 EXEGETICAL FALLACIES: COMMON INTERPRETIVE MISTAKES EVERY STUDENT MUST AVOID William D. Barrick Professor of Old Testament Students of the Bible often make mistakes that can be avoided if they are aware of errors that others have committed. One of the errors is the “Evidential Fallacy” which fails to approach the text with the presumption that it is accurate. Another mistake is the “Superior Knowledge Fallacy” which occurs when one, in approaching difficult texts, practices textual emendation to accommodate the critic’s ignorance. A third mistake is the “Word Study Fallacy” which uses imaginative extrapolations to find unjustified meanings in individual words. The “Fallacy of Reading Between the Lines” reads into the Scriptures what one thinks the text implies. Another mistake occurs in improper explanations of the two tenses of Hebrew verbs, the perfect (or qatal) and the imperfect (or yiqtol). Occasionally in the NT, the “Fallacy of Ignoring Particles” causes an interpreter to miss emphasis that is conveyed by Greek particles. Sometimes a translation leaves out words found in the original language causing the “Fallacy of Reduction.” Correct interpretation results from close attention to details of the text in avoiding the mistakes mentioned above, as well as others. * * * * * Introduction Over twenty years ago, D. A. Carson published his volume entitled Exegeti- cal Fallacies (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1984). In it he covers the areas of word-study fallacies, grammatical fallacies, logical fallacies, and presuppositional and historical fallacies. This writer believes that the book should be required reading for every Bible student. Although Carson might be faulted in his own exegesis for some of the examples he employs, he does a respectable job of covering the issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Presbyterians Without a Common Foe by D
    Article After the Breakup, Heartbreak: Conservative Presbyterians without a Common Foe by D. G. Hart In the 1930s, conservatives in the PCUSA believed that their cause against liberalism in the denominations’ agencies provided a common understanding of what it meant to be a Presbyterian in America. But once these conservatives formed their own communion, they experienced a series of controversies that revealed significant differences about the nature of American Presbyterianism. These conflicts, in fact, led to further divisions among conser- vatives. This article reviews the difficulties that afflicted the Orthodox Presbyterian Church during the first decade of its existence after 1936 and suggests that having a common foe is insufficient for agreement on a common identity. n June 11, 1936, J. Gresh- Princeton Theological Seminary, O am Machen declared had his own ideas about the before the first General Assem- correct way to proceed and led a bly of the Orthodox Presbyte- smaller group of conservatives rian Church, “We became into the Bible Presbyterian members, at last, of a true Pres- Synod. Even this rupture would byterian Church.” 1 The fifty or not relieve the pressures that so ministers and elders gathered bedeviled Machen’s followers. likely heard in Machen’s pro- Throughout the 1940s, the new nouncement the relief of a man denomination lost members and who had been engaged in de- ministers to other communions, nominational disputes and thanks to internal disputes over ecclesiastical intrigue for the J. Gresham Machen, 1881-1937. Photo denominational relations with better part of two decades. by Marceau (RG 414, Presbyterian non-Presbyterians.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shepherd Student
    WRS Journal 12:2 (August 2005): 27-36 THE SHEPHERD STUDENT Earl L. Brown, Jr. Breath of Breath1 says Qoheleth,2 the whole is breath. Not only was Qoheleth wise but he also taught knowledge to the people; he studiously weighed3 and arranged many proverbs. Qoheleth sought to find delightful words,4 and to write true words with precision.5 The words of the sages are like prods, and the collected sayings are like firmly fixed nails; they are given by one shepherd6 Be warned, my son, of anything in addition to them. There is no end to the making of many books, and much study is wearisome to the body.7 Having heard everything, I have reached this conclusion. Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man. For God will evaluate every deed, including every secret thing, whether good or evil. Ecclesiastes 12:8-14 [Brown adaptation of NET Bible8] The text set before us is not only the key to the interpretation of the book, but it accurately coalesces the convergent philosophy of life as a précis of the life of Solomon,9 as it is paraphrased in the lives of Robert Dick Wilson, Allan MacRae, and Robert W. Anderson.10 Life Transitions: From Solomon to Jesus, From David’s Son to David’s Greater Son Solomon was the Old Covenant prototype for the masterful Shepherd Student. Unlike Solomon, however, Jesus learned in his earthly human nature, obedience “through the things which he suffered” (Heb 5:8). It is in this capacity that Christ in the New Covenant provides a superior Shepherd and student (see 1 Pet 2:21).
    [Show full text]
  • Retrieval and the Doing of Theology
    Volume 23 · Number 2 Summer 2019 Retrieval and the Doing of Theology Vol. 23 • Num. 2 Retrieval and the Doing of Theology Stephen J. Wellum 3 Editorial: Reflections on Retrieval and the Doing of Theology Kevin J. Vanhoozer 7 Staurology, Ontology, and the Travail of Biblical Narrative: Once More unto the Biblical Theological Breach Stephen J. Wellum 35 Retrieval, Christology, and Sola Scriptura Gregg R. Allison 61 The Prospects for a “Mere Ecclesiology” Matthew Barrett 85 Will the Son Rise on a Fourth Horizon? The Heresy of Contemporaneity within Evangelical Biblicism and the Return of the Hermeneutical Boomerang for Dogmatic Exegesis Peter J. Gentry 105 A Preliminary Evaluation and Critique of Prosopological Exegesis Pierre Constant 123 Promise, Law, and the Gospel: Reading the Biblical Narrative with Paul SBJT Forum 137 Gregg R. Allison 157 Four Theses Concerning Human Embodiment Book Reviews 181 Editor-in-Chief: R. Albert Mohler, Jr. • Editor: Stephen J. Wellum • Associate Editor: Brian Vickers • Book Review Editor: John D. Wilsey • Assistant Editor: Brent E. Parker • Editorial Board: Matthew J. Hall, Hershael York, Paul Akin, Timothy Paul Jones, Kody C. Gibson • Typographer: Benjamin Aho • Editorial Office: SBTS Box 832, 2825 Lexington Rd., Louisville, KY 40280, (800) 626-5525, x 4413 • Editorial E-Mail: [email protected] Editorial: Reflections on Retrieval and the Doing of Theology Stephen J. Wellum Stephen J. Wellum is Professor of Christian Theology at The Southern Baptist Theo- logical Seminary and editor of Southern Baptist
    [Show full text]
  • Wheaton College, 1942
    <? To the Board-of Trustees of Wheaton College:' This is submitted, ao the report of the Committee appointed at the June meeting to investigate oertain questions which had arisen with respect to the teaching of Dr. Gordon H. Clark. Your Committee met with Dr. Clark and conferred with him at iength about the questions which had arisen and particularly xfc»ii£ as to his personal beliefs in certain theologiot.1 doctrines. we' are glad that we can commend hi-a frankness, and. we do not question his scholarly attainments or the intellectual; quality of his teaching. In moot reepecte we do not believe that his "Christian beliefs would differ materially from those...of others either of the faculty or of the trustees. However, he holds certain views, originating with John Calvin or with' imitators of Calvin, whion go, beyond what we could endorse. He carries th.e truth that God ie th,e original Being to... the,ipoint where he frankly states that God is the author even of evil; and he identifies the sins whioh are committed with God* a plan, to the point,, as^ we understand him, of saying that God purposed that they should be committed. To his mind these views] neither alleviate'the* guilt of the sinn&e^nor the need and duty of preaching Irighteousness and salvation. This situation may be better- understood fi we quote a few particular beliefs whioh he holds: r . God deoreoo one man to be a murderer, or'adulterer, ; or idiot. j God decrees some to heaven and some to.hell* .
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction Du Branch Patrimoine De I'edition
    A MONERGISTIC THEOLOGICAL ACCOUNT OF MORAL EVIL by C. Elmer Chen A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of PROVIDENCE THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-37195-4 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-37195-4 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation. reproduced without the author's permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Scripture As Talisman, Specimen, and Dragoman
    JETS 50/1 (March 2007) 3–30 SCRIPTURE AS TALISMAN, SPECIMEN, AND DRAGOMAN edwin m. yamauchi* I would like to call attention to three contrasting attitudes towards the Jewish and Christian Scriptures by my title. Scripture as Talisman repre- sents the use of Scriptures by believers with little knowledge of the original setting of the texts, which are used at times for magical ends and at other times are followed literally without regard to their original contexts. Scripture as Specimen represents the critical analysis of the texts by skeptical scholars who view them simply as objects of academic study without faith in their value as divine revelation. Scripture as Dragoman or “interpreter” represents the scholarly study of Scripture by believers such as ETS members, who seek guidance through careful inquiry into the original setting of the texts to de- termine their significance for us today. According to Anthony C. Thiselton, Even if, for the moment, we leave out of account the modern reader’s historical conditionedness, we are still faced with the undeniable fact that if a text is to be understood there must occur an engagement between two sets of horizons (to use Gadamer’s phrase), namely those of the ancient text and those of the modern reader or hearer.1 i. scripture as talisman 2 Magic is still quite prevalent in many places of the world today such as the Caribbean and Africa.3 The world of the Bible was a world pervaded by belief in magic.4 There are some alleged cases of magic in the OT and in the * Edwin M.
    [Show full text]