DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Entire Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Entire Program 'll'l!JJt~ J!E f!JN~!J W fG If rJ -J ct rR> lJ 'If'flNB® !J,f!J) J&S(C~ [J $®(CSB~:J' presce ro FJs Mt~ November 19-21, 1998 / Radisson Twin Towers Orlando, Florida www.etsjets.org ~ ffi ~Ilfi® il?®mll~®ffi ll®rP 'IT®lilLP @mro;lli The study of Greek is often a struggle for students. That's why it's important to have the right textbook to lay the ~roundwork. For many, Basics of Biblical Greek, by William 0. Mounce. has become that hook. This highly acclaimed text makes learning Greek a natural (UU!UG) process, even for those who aren't natural at \earning languages. By dealing with the New Testament text from the beginning, it makes dear that knowledge of Greek helps in under­ William D. Mounce standing the New Testament-another struggle smdcnts often have. Written from the stu­ dent's perspective, Basics of Biblical Greek combines the best of the inductive and FOR INFORM.ATION ON o\DOnlNG deductive methods. llelp your students hegin to master Greek with what Frank Thielman AND OTHER BOOKS FROM OI1R LI~"E OF calls ''the finest New Testament grmnmar avai\ahle." GKEEK U:XTS, COIVTACT JACK KRAGT, ACAOF.MIC SPEC:IALISf, AT ORAT [email protected] ©roll~®:rnLlwffio ~@o '""/tile .~/N~Iory o•J I itn,rry 1\,.,,u•/o,l~o:•· ©:wffili®ru]]XID~ - I!§ 17J:M!rce lflJ MelflJ1l11i1l11g i1J1J 'J!7bi§ Jf'exfl? The Bible, the Reader, and the Morality of Literary Knowledge by Kevin J. Vanhomcr Is there a meaning in the text of the Bible, or is meaning mther a matler o[ who is reading or of how one reads' Docs evangelical Christian tioctrine have an)thing to contribute to debates about interpretation, literary theorr, anti postmo~emi~·> These are questions of cmcial importance for contemporary brblical snrdies and theology alike. This monograph is a comprehensive an~ creative :malysis of current debates over biblical hermeneutics that LOOK FOR draws on interdisciplinary resources, all coordinate~ bv Christian theoloh'Y· Is 'lhere a Meaning in Tbis Text' guities the student towarti greater confi~ence in the authority, clarity, anti relevance of Scripture, an~ is a well-reasoned an:uysis of boll' to understand accurately the message of the Bible. AT YOUR LOCAL lhe amhor, Kevin Vanhoozer (l'h.ti., Cambritige University), is senior lecturer in theology and religious BOOKSTORE, OR CAJ.L studies at ~ew College, University of Etiinburgh, in Edinburgh, Scotland. lie is au~10r of Biblical Narratire in the Philosopby ofl'au/1/icoenr: An Essay in Hcnneneufics and 'lbeolof!J'· J1 _n_ (10 _1\.. 0 :!)j UH ·=/ilOJO(Q(<;:Jr .DJLO \ll1'ill<mill \'24 :! 3 ~ PLENARY SESSIONS All plenary sessions will he held in the Citrus Crown Ballroom (f ROGER NICOLE I Professor of Theology Refonned Theological Seminary, Orlando The Beginnings ofthe ETS 50 Years Ago: fttusings ofa Founder Thursday, 1:25-2:.>5 p.m. NORMAN GEISLER Dean and Professor of Apologetics Southern Evangelical Seminary, Charlotte, N.C. Beware ofPhilosophy: A Caution to Biblical Exegetes (ETS Presidential Address) Thursday, 8:20-9:10 p.m. D.A. CARSON Research Professor of New Testament Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Deerfield, Illinois Training the Next Generation ofEvangelical Scholars Friday, 1:10-2:10 p.m. JOHN PIPER Senior Pastor Bethlehem Baptist Church, Minneapolis Training the Next Genera/ion ofEvangelical Pastors and Missionaries V' Friday, 2:15-3:15 p.m. PANEL DISCUSSION Have Protestants and Catholics finally Agrr!ed on Salvation' Panel on Roman Catholic-Evangelical Document, 'The Gift ofSalvation" Friday. 7:30 -9:30 p.m. P A N E L MEMBERS /~ FATHER FRANCIS MARTIN* ' Professor of Biblical Studies john Paul II lnstiiUie for Srudies on Marriage and the Family, Washington D.C. (Roman Catholic co-author of the document) J. I. PACKER Professor of Theology Regent College, Vancoul'er, Canada (Evangelical co-author of the document) ROBERT GODFREY ~ President - ( Wesurtinster Theological Seminary, California (Evangelical ~;th serious concerns about the document) LUDER WHITLOCK President Refonned Theological Seminary (Moderator) The last 45 minutes of this session will he used for interaction with the audience. • Special Guest of the ~'TS T A B L E OF CONTENTS Registration Fonns ...................................................................................................... 2 Conference lnfonnation ............................................................................................... 6 Overview of Schedule .................................................................................................. 8 Meeting Schedule Wednesday evening ........................................................................................ 9 Thursday morning ......................................................................................... ! 0 Thursday afternoon ...................................................................................... 17 Thursday evening .......................................................................................... 23 Friday morning ............................................................................................. 24 Friday aftemoon ............................................................................................ 32 Friday evening ............................................................................................... 36 Saturday morning .......................................................................................... 37 ETS Executive Commiltee ............................................................................................ 4l ETS President~ .......................................................................................................... 42 ETS National Conferences .......................................................................................... 42 Study Group ContaLi lnfonnation ............................................................................... 43 Affiliated Societies ..................................................................................................... 45 Index of Speakers ....................................................................................................... 46 Area Maps .................................................................................................................. 48 5 0 T H A NNUAL MEETING EVANGELICAL THEOLOGICAL SOCIETY CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FORM Please Register Early Name: ___________________________Phone: '----- Name for tag (no tide plea.<e): --------------------- 0 Non-member spouse anending. Name for tag: (Non-mcmb~r spou~c~ may anent.! conft'rmce sessions frl't') Address: __________________________________________ City: __________________________ State!Prov.: ______.Zip!Postal Code _______ Current Member of: 0 ETS 0 ATS 0 EMS 0 EPS 0 NEAS 0 Other ___________ School: _________________________ 0 Faculty 0 Staff/Administration 0 Student Church or other identification for those not associated directly \\;th a school: ----------------------- Please enclose a check made out to the Eva.ngelical Theological Society. No refunds after November 1, 1998. Name badges & ba.nquet tickets will be sent by return mail after October I. 0 Early Conference Member Registration $40 (Postmarked before September 30) 0 Late Member Registration (Postmarked after September 30) $50 /' - . /~ 0 Non-Member Registration (Non-ETS, EPS, ATS, NEAS, EMS) $65 0 Ba.nquet: Thursday, 7:00p.m. Chicken entree with salad, vegetable, rolls, beverage, and dessert. / __Ticket includes tax a.nd gratuity. $25 ea. TOTAL $ Mail to: Dr. james A. Borla.nd Secretaryffreasurer, ETS 112 Russell Woods Drive Lynchburg, VA 24502-3530 Inquiries: 804.237.5309 Phone & FAX 2 3 EVANGELICAL THEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Application for (check one): 0 Full Membership .......$20.00 (requires Tb.M /Ph.D. or equn~m1J 0 Associate Membership .. $20.00 0 Student Membership .$15.00 N:une: _______________________________Date: ------------- Address: ____________________________________________ City: ____________________StauVProv. _______.Zip/Postal Code: _________ Country: __________________Phone: '----' ________ Present Position (with rank):-------------------------------------- Institution: _______________________________________________ Education: School: _________________________D,egree: __________llate: ______ School: Degree: __________Date: ______ School: _______________________,Degree: _________Date: ______ llonorary Degrees: -------------------------------------------- Membership in Learned Societies:--------------------------------------- Books Published: Publisher: Date: Specialized Field of Research:---------------------------------------­ Positions held other than the present: ------------------------------------- Denomination or Church Affiliation: -------------------------------------- "The Bible alone and the Bible in its entirety, is the Word of God wriuen, and therefore inerr.tnt in the autographs. God is a Trinity, Father, Son, and lloly Spirit, each an uncrcatcd person, one in essence, cquaJ in power and glory." Article IV, Section 2 of the Constirution reads: "Every member must subscribe in writing annuaUy to the 'Doctrinal Basis."' Signature of Recommending Society Member (For Student & Assodate Applicalions Only) Signamrc of Applicant Persons you would recommend for membership (use reverse side for others): Name Address Send to: Dr. james A. Borland Phone: 804.237.5309 Secretaryffreasurer, ETS FAX: 804.237.5309 112 Russell Woods Drive Lynchburg, VA 24502-3530 Plca.~c enclose apptication fee. 4 5 CONFERENCE INFORMATION Location and Facilities The meeting will be held
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Memorials 2005
    Scholars Crossing SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations 3-2005 Memorials 2005 James A. Borland Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/sor_fac_pubs Recommended Citation Borland, James A., "Memorials 2005" (2005). SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations. 58. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/sor_fac_pubs/58 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JETS 48/1 (March 2005) 213–20 MEMORIALS gleason leonard archer, jr. Gleason Leonard Archer, Jr. was born on May 22, 1916, in Norwell, MA, the third child of Elizabeth (Snyder) and Gleason Archer, Sr. His older sib- lings were a brother, Allen, and a sister, Marion. Gleason grew up in Boston and attended Boston Latin School. His father founded the Suffolk University Law School in Boston where the family lived during the school year, retreat- ing to Norwell during the summers. Gleason’s mother was a Christian, a member of the Park Street Church, and he came to know Christ at an early age through her influence. Gleason attended Harvard College and received his B.A. degree in 1938, followed in 1939 by his LL.B. degree from Suffolk University Law School in Boston. His took his A.M. degree from Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in 1940, and his Ph.D. from the same institution in 1944. He grad- uated with his Bachelor of Divinity from Princeton Theological Seminary the following year.
    [Show full text]
  • Catechism in the Worshiping Community B Y G E Ra L D J
    Copyright © 2007 Center for Christian Ethics at Baylor University Catechism in the Worshiping Community B Y G E ra L D J . Ma ST How much of Christian teaching should be explanation and how much example? Without denying the significance of words, the books reviewed here explore the neglected significance of worship and everyday practices in shaping the hearts and minds of growing believers. n passing along the faith to the next generation of church members, how much of Christian teaching should be explanation and how much Iexample? Is the faith best described or best performed? Are we most persuaded by word or by deed? Without denying the significance of words, many recent authors of books about doctrine and catechism emphasize the neglected significance of liturgical and everyday practice in shaping the minds and bodies of growing believers. Perhaps the best explanation for this turn to the performative in theories of catechism can be found in a massive new volume on theological method which argues that doctrine can best be conceived as a drama—a stage on which the enactment of Scripture unfolds in the life of the Church. In his book, The Drama of Doctrine (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2005, 488 pp., $39.95), Kevin Vanhoozer, Research Professor of Systematic Theology at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, relies extensively on the work of Catholic theologian Han Urs von Balthasar to develop the claim that “what lies at the heart of gospel is not an idea or an ideal or an experi- ence, but an action” (p. 50). Vanhoozer positions his work at the edge of changing understandings about the meaning of doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • Theological Interpretation of Scripture: Yes, But
    Chapter 12 Theological Interpretation of Scripture: Yes, But D.A. Carson Theological Interpretation of Scripture (TIS) is partly disparate movement, partly a call to reformation in biblical interpretation, partly a disorganized array of methodological commitments in hermeneutics, partly a serious enter­ prise and partly (I suspect) a fad. Different writers speak of TIS in fairly diverse ways. One might even argue that some people who offer the best theological interpretation of Scripture (note the lowercase letters) have very little con­ nection with the movement known as TIS: one need search no farther than the honoree of this volume, whose astonishing range of expertise includes competent exegesis ofthe documents of both Testaments, an impressive grasp of the history of interpretation, a deep understanding of many nuances in the patristic period, in the Reformation age, and in contemporary (especially European) theology, and whose interpretation of Scripture is never flaccid or narrowly historical, but invariably profoundly theological. If all who align themselves with TIS were committed to pursuing the kind of theological inter­ pretation of Scripture exemplified in the writings of Henri Blocher (most of whose work, sadly, has never been translated into English), the chapter I am now writing would be very different. Another writer who does not connect his work with TIS but who is traveling down a parallel path is Peter Leithart,l who prefers to speak of entering into the depths of the text. Always evocative and sometimes provocative, Leithart provides another parallel to the TIS tradition: his actual handling of biblical texts, while invariably stimulating, is less frequently convincing.2 As I worked to canvas the literature, I had expected to write something that said "Yes" to an array of important points, and then to introduce my list of objections or questions with "But"-and indeed, not a few have written essays 1 See especially his Deep Exegesis: The Mystery ofReading Scripture (Waco, TX: Baylor University, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • The Inerrancy and Authority of Scripture in Christian Apologetics
    The Journal of Ministry & Theology 50 The Inerrancy and Authority of Scripture in Christian Apologetics Lee Allen Anderson Jr. INTRODUCTION Scripture’s call to Christians to engage in the apologetic task is markedly obvious. For example, 1 Peter 3:15 instructs believers to always be “ready to make a defense (ἀπολογίαν) to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you.” Similarly, Jude 3 exhorts Christians to “contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all handed down to the saints.” Here, the “faith” refers not to the subjective element of personal trust in the Lord God, but instead to that “body of truth that very early in the church’s history took on a definite form,” that is, the content of Christian faith—doctrinal truth (cf. Gal 1:23; 1 Tim 4:1).1 Implicit in this verse, therefore, is the acknowledgment of the fact that a certain body of doctrinal truth exists, which in turn implies a source or origin for that doctrinal truth. For the Christian, the principle, authoritative source of doctrinal truth is the “God-breathed” holy Scriptures (2 Tim 3:16). The reliability of Scripture as a standard for Christian doctrine hinges on the fact that, as the inspired word of the true God who does not lie (Num 23:19; Titus 1:2; Heb 6:18), it is wholly true (Ps 119:160; John 17:17). To echo the words of the longstanding affirmation of the Evangelical Theological Society, “The Bible alone, and the Bible in its entirety, is the Word of God written and is therefore inerrant in the autographs.”2 This affirmation is not a peripheral issue to Christian theology; it is germane to the life of the church and, of logical consequence, the upholding of the Christian faith.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rapture in Twenty Centuries of Biblical Interpretation
    TMSJ 13/2 (Fall 2002) 149-171 THE RAPTURE IN TWENTY CENTURIES OF BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION James F. Stitzinger Associate Professor of Historical Theology The coming of God’s Messiah deserves closer attention than it has often received. The future coming of the Messiah, called the “rapture,” is imminent, literal and visible, for all church saints, before the hour of testing, premillennial, and, based on a literal hermeneutic, distinguishes between Israel and the church. The early church fathers’ views advocated a sort of imminent intra- or post- tribulationism in connection with their premillennial teaching. With a few exceptions, the Medieval church writers said little about a future millennium and a future rapture. Reformation leaders had little to say about prophetic portions of Scripture, but did comment on the imminency of Christ’s return. The modern period of church history saw a return to the early church’s premillennial teaching and a pretribulational rapture in the writings of Gill and Edwards, and more particularly in the works of J. N. Darby. After Darby, pretribulationism spread rapidly in both Great Britain and the United States. A resurgence of posttribulationism came after 1952, accompanied by strong opposition to pretribulationism, but a renewed support of pretribulationism has arisen in the recent past. Five premillennial views of the rapture include two major views—pretribulationism and posttribulation-ism—and three minor views—partial, midtribulational, and pre-wrath rapturism. * * * * * Introduction The central theme of the Bible is the coming of God’s Messiah. Genesis 3:15 reveals the first promise of Christ’s coming when it records, “He shall bruise you on the head, And you shall bruise him on the heel.”1 Revelation 22:20 unveils the last promise when it records “He who testifies to these things says, ‘Yes, I am coming quickly,’ Amen.
    [Show full text]
  • Putting on Christ: Spiritual Formation and the Drama of Discipleship
    Journal of Spiritual Formation & Soul Care Copyright 2015 by Institute for Spiritual Formation 2015, Vol. 8, No. 2, 147–171 Biola University, 1939-7909 Putting on Christ: Spiritual Formation and the Drama of Discipleship Kevin J.• Vanhoozer Trinity Evangelical Divinity School Abstract. C. S. Lewis called for spiritual formation long before the term became pop- ular: “Every Christian is to become a little Christ. The whole purpose of becoming a Christian is simply nothing else” (Mere Christianity, 171). Lewis’s call to become little Christs recalls Paul’s exhortation to “put off” the old self and “put on” Christ. This paper explores what this change of costume involves from the perspective of what a “theodramatic” approach to theology that I have developed in The Drama of Doctrine and Faith Speaking Understanding. I there argue that the role of doctrine is to (1) indicate what is in Christ and (2) direct those in Christ to participate in Christ by playing their parts in the drama of redemption. This theatrical model raises an important issue concerning the disciple’s self-understanding: Is it healthy for Chris- tians to think in terms of “acting out” what is “in Christ” (their new identities as Christ’s disciples) or does this encourage a false sense of self – a “put on”? I respond to this question in four steps where I (1) present a theodramatic anthropology, (2) describe discipleship as the project of growing into/putting on Christ, (3) consider three objections to my previous work about the relationship between persons/roles and role-playing, and (4) respond to the objections by offering a dogmatic descrip- tion of putting on Christ (i.e., spiritual formation) in soteriological, pneumatologi- cal, and eschatological terms.
    [Show full text]
  • “Te Great Merit of Köstenberger's and Patterson's Volume Is Its Three
    “!e great merit of Köstenberger’s and Patterson’s volume is its three- dimension account of biblical interpretation. !e authors rightly focus on the history, literature, and theology of the Bible—what they call the hermeneutical triad. Call it hermeneutics in real 3-D. A three-stranded hermeneutical cord may not be easily broken, but it’s easy to grasp by fol- lowing this introductory textbook. Another merit is the authors’ reminder that biblical interpretation is not only about method but about virtue: a heart-felt humility before the divine text is as important as any heady procedure.” —Kevin J. Vanhoozer, Blanchard Professor of !eology, Wheaton College Graduate School “I am "lled with admiration. I learned much from this vigorous book. It is a work of great clarity that summarizes the best principles of general hermeneutics with the best principles of biblical interpretation. Professor Köstenberger’s and Patterson’s students are lucky to have such a trenchant and learned guide—and so are the readers of this "ne book.” —E. D. Hirsch, Jr., Professor Emeritus of Education & Humanities, University of Virginia and Founder, Core Knowledge Foundation “!ere are certain topics of must-reading for serious Bible students— hermeneutics is at the top. !ere are certain books of must-reading for a topic—Andreas Köstenberger’s work on hermeneutics is one of them. It is clear, concise, and yet deep, and manages to cover most of the needed areas. !us it becomes an invaluable guide for the student working through the labyrinth of issues that make up the task of biblical interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanity's Capacity to Apprehend Aesthetic Value
    Submission Page Humanity’s Capacity to Apprehend Aesthetic Value as an Argument for God’s Existence To Fulfill the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Divinity Liberty University Walter Hurst Davis Sr. Read and Approved by: Chairperson: _ Dr. Dan Mitchell_______________________ Reader: _____Dr. Joseph Wooddell____________________ Reader: ______Dr. Samuel Smith_____________________ Date: ___May 6, 2016_________________ Liberty University Humanity’s Capacity to Apprehend Aesthetic Value as an Argument for God’s Existence A Dissertation Submitted to The Faculty of the Rawlings School of Divinity In Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Divinity by Walter Hurst Davis Sr. Lynchburg, VA May 2016 Copyright Page Copyright © 2016 Walter H. Davis Sr. All Rights Reserved ii Dedication To my faithful wife Dodie Mae Davis, my children and grandchildren, for their faithful endurance. I chose to endure the inconveniences of this process. They did not. iii Contents Preface ix Acknowledgements xi Abstract xiii Introduction 1 Clarifying the Role of Theistic Arguments 6 The Relevance of the Thesis 10 The Argument and Reasoning Methods 11 The Vital Relationship between Theology and Apologetics 12 The Place for this Study in Apologetics 15 The Plan for the Study 20 Chapter 1: A Defense of Abductive Reasoning in Light of Other Reasoning Methods 22 Deductive Reasoning 25 Hesitancy in Using Deductive Reasoning 26 Deciding Against the Use of Deduction 36 Inductive Reasoning 38 The Inductive Nature of the Evidential
    [Show full text]
  • How Far Beyond Chicago? Assessing Recent Attempts to Reframe the Inerrancy Debate — Jason S
    Themelios 34.1 (2009): 26-49 How Far Beyond Chicago? Assessing Recent Attempts to Reframe the Inerrancy Debate — Jason S. Sexton — Jason Sexton is a licensed minister with the Evangelical Free Church of America and PhD candidate in Systematic Theology at The University of St. Andrews, Scotland. he doctrine of inerrancy has been a watershed issue among evangelicals in the West, perhaps now Tmore evident than ever.1 While the inerrancy debate never entirely dissipated from its last spell in the late 1970s and early 1980s, it recently surged to the forefront of discussions about an evan- gelical doctrine of Scripture both in North America and abroad. This transpired with recent events in the Evangelical Theological Society (hereafter, ETS) dealing with inerrancy2 and fresh publications of at least a dozen books, articles, and reviews.3 With this new rally, one might say that evangelicalism is 1 It was designated a “watershed” over three decades ago by Harold Lindsell, The Battle for the Bible (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1976), 26–27, and eight years later by Francis A. Schaeffer, The Great Evangelical Disaster (Wheaton: Crossway, 1984), 44. The degree of watershed was challenged early by Richard H. Bube, “Inerrancy Is/Is Not the Watershed of Evangeli- calism: None of the Above,” Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation 29 (March 1977): 46–47, who called for “revelational inerrancy,” asserting that the term “inerrancy” outlived its usefulness. Some, however, see the inerrancy debate as a watershed for other reasons—because of a “classically modern” view of truth that made inerrancy the “foundational Christian doctrine upon which all others depend.” Jeffery Stephen Oldfield, “The Word Became Text and Dwells Among Us? An Examination of the Doctrine of Inerrancy” (PhD thesis, University of St Andrews, 2007), 232–33.
    [Show full text]
  • HOW to READ the BIBLE, PART 2: the SCIENCE and ART of INTERPRETATION Far More Than Picking up a Dictionary and Finding a Definition
    HOW TO READBILL KYNES,THE PH.D. BIBLE, PART 2: HOW TO READ THE BIBLE, PART 2: THETHE SCIENCESCIENCE AND ART OFAND INTERPRETATION ART OF INTERPRETATION BILL KYNES, PH.D. C.S. LEWIS INSTITUTE SENIOR FELLOW FOR PASTORAL THEOLOGY SENIOR PASTOR, CORNERSTONE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH o you want to read the Bible, but you’re not sure how to do it well. What does it really mean? How is the Bible rightly understood? This is a critical question, for it is often asserted that you can get the Bible to say just about anything you want it to say. And hasn’t that been true? After all, didn’t people once use the S Bible to defend slavery, polygamy, the divine right of kings, or the drowning of witches? Shakespeare says it well: In religion, what damned error but some sober brow will bless it, and approve it with a text, hiding the grossness with fair ornament.1 Understanding the Bible necessarily involves interpretation, or what scholars call hermeneutics. We engage in interpretation all the time. Every time we read a billboard, read a letter, examine a legal contract, or pick up a book, we must interpret what is written. We must decode the signs of communication and seek to answer the question, what does this mean? This process is both a science and an art. We think of it as a science in that we seek certain logical rules and procedures that can be applied across the board that result in meaning; we want accuracy and precision. But we have to realize that interpretation is also an art.
    [Show full text]
  • Apologetics in a Postmodern World
    Apologetics in a Postmodern World Submitted for The 2019 Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary Symposium on Christian Apologetics By Justin C. Cloute September 16-17, 2019 Intro “Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river runs through it. The river was cut by the world's great flood and runs over rocks from the basement of time. On some of the rocks are timeless raindrops. Under the rocks are the words, and some of the words are theirs. I am haunted by waters.” – Norman Maclean, A River Runs Through It Language … Words … Meaning. At the dawn of time—before the rocks—when the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters, the Lord spoke into the void and called everything into existence. Then he spoke to his Triune-self to verbalize his gracious intent to create the crown of his creation: “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness …”1 In the very next words uttered by the Creator, he blessed the man and the woman and commanded them to “fill the earth and subdue it.” After the first couple disobeyed God’s word and brought sin and death upon the world, the Lord God immediately promised to send the Offspring of the women to crush the serpent’s head. Millenia later the Offspring was born and spoke words that were from God himself and imparted eternal life to those who accepted them.2 In some of the very last words recorded by the Apostle John, the one who crushed Satan’s head and rose from the dead, promises, “Yes, I am coming soon.”3 From the first chapter of Holy Scripture to the very last, God’s Word proclaims his will for mankind and reveals his loving heart for humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • Postmodern Developments in Evangelical Theology Robert Weston Siscoe Olivet Nazarene University, [email protected]
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Commons @ Olivet Olivet Nazarene University Digital Commons @ Olivet Honors Program Projects Honors Program 5-2011 Postmodern Developments in Evangelical Theology Robert Weston Siscoe Olivet Nazarene University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.olivet.edu/honr_proj Part of the Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, History of Religions of Western Origin Commons, Other Philosophy Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Siscoe, Robert Weston, "Postmodern Developments in Evangelical Theology" (2011). Honors Program Projects. 9. https://digitalcommons.olivet.edu/honr_proj/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at Digital Commons @ Olivet. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Olivet. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Olivet Nazarene University for making this research possible. I came to Olivet specifically because I would have to opportunity to participate in an undergraduate research experience, and the offer has lived up to my expectations. I want to thank Olivet for the funding, instruction, and inspiration that I received all along the way. I would also like to thank my mentor and faculty advisor Kevin Twain Lowery for countless suggestions and re-evaluations throughout my first experience with research. His guidance and experience in the academic and pastoral settings helped me condense my final thoughts in a way that is both accessible and insightful.
    [Show full text]