DOCSLIB.ORG

Ballistic Composites – Protecting the Protectors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ballistic Composites – Protecting the Protectors Reinforced Plastics Volume 61, Number 2 March/April 2017 www.reinforcedplastics.com FEATURE Ballistic composites – protecting the protectors George Marsh It seems scarcely credible that thin polymer fibers, bound together in resin, can stop projectiles ranging from a hand-gun bullet to a high-power rifle round, but they can and have done so, saving many lives in the process. Composite body armor protects a wide range of civilians from security guards to police officers and from bailiffs to VIPs. But of course, it is military forces who are the leading user group. degraded. Second is a slowing phase and third is the catching of Traditional solutions for 20th Century military armor, based the round so that it is retained within the protective garment. chiefly on steel and ceramic plates, were really too heavy for Laminates are designed to maximize the effectiveness of these soldiers, indeed for many vehicles as well. Composites have in- stages. Outer layers that provide controlled delamination on creasingly proved to be the answer, being much lighter for the impact are effective in deforming the tip of a projectile, thereby same stopping power and more pliable. Certain polymer compo- blunting it. Certain non-polymer composites, for instance those sites show, when appropriately engineered, remarkable energy that are ceramic based, may be harder than polymer composites dissipation properties, being able to absorb the kinetic energy and therefore more effective in this phase. Even so, reinforced from bullets and other high-speed projectiles before these can plastics often provide the best balance of weight, anti-ballistic harm their human targets. They can also protect against knives. performance and cost. Various mechanisms account for this. Pushing fibers aside Underlying composite layers subsequently absorb kinetic ener- against their stiffness and the hold exerted by the composite they gy progressively as more and more fibers are displaced and are part of, absorbs energy and the greater the number of fibers encountered, the stronger is the effect. Still more energy is absorbed as fibers become stretched during contact with projec- tiles, elongation-before-break being an important variable for armor designers. A third mechanism is that of delamination, whereby energy is absorbed in parting fibers from their resin containment medium. Yet another mechanism occurs in woven fabrics where the woven intersections slow down the shock waves propagated along the fibers from the impact point, absorbing energy as they do so. This does, however, increase the strain within the material and when this exceeds what the material can tolerate, penetration can occur. Hence whether to use wovens or non-wovens is a matter for careful consideration by protection designers (Figs. 1–3). According to ballistic specialists with Swiss-headquartered com- posites firm Gurit AG, stopping a bullet has three distinct stages. FIG. 1 First is the blunting of the projectile so that its penetrating power is Flack jackets based on Kevlar or other proprietary aramid can be worn under normal clothing by both men and women. Image licensed by E-mail address: [email protected]. Shutterstock. 0034-3617/ß 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 96 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.repl.2015.10.003 Reinforced Plastics Volume 61, Number 2 March/April 2017 FEATURE pockets incorporated in the garment. Such inserts are typical of protection that is rifle ballistic rated since fabrics alone cannot normally stop a rifle round traveling at 800 m/s whereas they can prevent penetration by a hand gun bullet traveling at half that speed. Although body armor designed to defeat rifle fire is inevi- tably more rigid than fabric-only garments, keeping the armor inserts separated ensures an adequate level of garment flexibility for most purposes. Nylon start An early example of the transition from metals to composites for personnel protection was the British Army’s GS Mk 6 combat helmet, issued during the 1960s. This had an outer shell of ballistic nylon impregnated with a 50:50 mix of phenoformaldehyde and FIG. 2 polyvinyl butyral (PVB) resins, this matrix accounting for 20% of FEATURE Kevlar helmet with camouflage cover and protective goggles. Image the composite’s weight. The shell comprised 23 layers of plain- licensed by Shutterstock. 2 weave 290 g/m nylon, weighing 1 kg for the medium size of helmet. An inner impact absorbing layer of high-density polyeth- stretched. Composites used in body armor, where structural ylene (HDPE) foam brought this weight up to 1.3 kg. Fiberglass, strength is less of a requirement than in vehicle protection, and even combined nylon and fiberglass, were also tried during generally have very high fiber content, up to 80% or more, and those early years, providing some benefits over nylon. specialized polymer fibers are used. Even in armor that has a During the 1970s, the US Army was to adopt para-aramid fibers ceramic outer face, this is generally backed by composite laminate for head protection, albeit in resins similar to those used by the to meet the slowing and catching requirements, including of British. PVB-based resins were readily Beta-staged into a prepreg penetrative fragments that are expelled from improvised explosive that could then be hot-molded to the tight complex curvatures devices (IEDs) and fragmentation rounds (such fragments are required for combat helmets. Aramids, the best known of which known as spall). are DuPont’s Kevlar and Twaron from Teijin (the Netherlands and IEDs deliver blast, fragments and fire so that combined protec- Japan), subsequently spread from helmets into body protection. tion against these is desirable. Materials that mitigate these effects The Kevlar ‘flak jacket’, for instance, became almost a generic, as well as being environmentally tolerant – to moisture, heat, etc. – initially for ballistic vests that protect against fragments from are in demand. Another required attribute is that they should be shells, grenades and other munitions, but also later for garments able to resist not just single hits but also repeated shots, as from a that are substantially bullet-proof. machine gun. Para-aramid fibers have a rigid rod-like molecular structure that Body armor is typically based on woven and non-woven fabrics provides high-tensile strength, high elongation-to-break and good that are flexible enough to provide wearers with freedom of damage tolerance. They are also inherently non-flammable. Today movement while still possessing high anti-ballistic properties. they tend to be embedded in more contemporary matrices, typi- Many garments incorporate extra protection in strategic areas cally epoxy or phenolic. The resulting composites are heavily fiber such as over the heart; this can take the form of plates of compos- dominated. Like other specialists in ballistic fibers, DuPont Pro- ite, ceramic, metal or hybrid material inserted into containment tection Technologies has worked hard to optimize its base material FIG. 3 From police officers to soldiers, Dyneema Force Multiplier Technology is protecting personnel around the world. 97 FEATURE Reinforced Plastics Volume 61, Number 2 March/April 2017 for ballistic use. Refined molecular structures in products like Dyneema is a gel-spun multiple-filament UHDPE fiber that Kevlar XP and Kevlar M5 combine high strength with superior combines high strength, high modulus in the fiber direction thermal and flame resistance. According to global business director and resistance to most chemicals. Gel spinning involves melting Jeroen B. Jacobs, Kevlar is, weight for weight, five times stronger the PE polymer but also dissolving it in a solvent so that molecular than steel and, in its various forms optimized for different envir- chains become realigned, the resulting high alignment enhancing onments and user groups, has saved thousands of lives. fiber strength. The solvent is then extracted. Low diameter fibers Despite the dominance of Kevlar and other aramids, glass still are produced in a range of strengths and densities to suit different survives as an armor fiber. There is a place for the higher-perfor- ballistic applications. mance fibers, such as S-glass used in preference to the more Another polymer fiber, polyphenylene-benzobisoxiazole (PBO) general E-glass. According to Gurit, this raises ballistic tolerance that emerged in the 1990s, notably under the trade name Zylon by 10–20%. Although this company’s recently launched PF700 (Toyoba, Japan), has 1.6 times the tensile strength of aramid, but ballistic prepreg is mainly intended as a vehicle armor rather than has a high cost. An all-PBO ballistic vest would probably be very FEATURE for personnel protection applications, it is worthy of mention here expensive but the fact that such a garment could be made much because it exemplifies once again the sheer versatility of glass fiber thinner for equivalent performance could be a considerable draw if and its unsuspected utility in meeting tough anti-ballistic require- costs could be reduced. A US company started using PBO in ments. PF700 uses the fibers in combination with phenolic resin, protection for police officers in 1998, but five years later withdrew the latter being preferred over epoxy due to its flame resistance, the product after an officer died despite having been wearing a PBO even though epoxy may be stronger. vest when shot. Degradation in properties over time proved to be Carbon and boron have been experimented with but the brittle the issue. nature of these fibers has restricted their use in anti-ballistic applications. Ballistic optimization There are so many variables ballistic garment designers must Later fibers juggle – material amount, fiber volume fraction, fiber type and Latterly there has been penetration of the market by high perform- diameter, woven/non-woven, fabric geometry, fiber sizing, ply ing fibers based on ultra high-density polyethylene (UHDPE). count, fiber/resin bond strength, resin type and process parame- These include Dyneema from DSM Dyneema, part of Dutch con- ters, and so on – that optimization can be a considerable challenge, cern Royal DSM, and Spectra from Honeywell in the United States.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Piecing Together the Construction of Soft Body Armor
    By Jeannine Heinecke Piecing together the construction of soft body armor hen I started in law today’s soft body armor is becoming “W enforcement in the mid- a more sleek, comfortable, flexible, 1970s, the first vest I got looked life-protecting second skin for law and felt like a Manhattan Yellow enforcement officers. With this evo- Pages wrapped in a plastic bag,” lution comes improved wear rates describes Georg Olsen, a long-time and more lives saved. “Officers aren’t veteran of law enforcement and obstinate or stupid,” comments general manager of U.S. Armor, Olsen. “They want the protection, located in Cerritos, California. but they have to have the flexibility Through the evolution of ballistic and mobility to do their jobs.” fibers and construction methods, Part of finding the right protec- U.S. Armor’s Tactical Assault Vest (T.A.V.) and Terminal Velocity series vest. tion is making an educated deci- Wagner, manager of technology construction allows for faster ener- sion when purchasing soft body for Honeywell’s Advanced Fibers gy dissipation and reduced back- armor. Officers need to know and Composites Group. “It has face deformation — the energy that the types of fibers used, how a an orientation and regularity. The was not dissipated by the vest and vest should properly fit and the order of the molecular chains is will impact the body. advancements in construction aligned along the length of the Honeywell discovered this pro- methods leading to more fiber, which helps with the trans- cess not only works for HPPE comfortable, wearable vests.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Behind Armour Blunt Trauma a Real Threat to Users of Body Armour? a Systematic Review
    Review J R Army Med Corps: first published as 10.1136/jramc-2013-000161 on 13 November 2013. Downloaded from Is behind armour blunt trauma a real threat to users of body armour? A systematic review 1 1 2 Editor’s choice Debra J Carr, I Horsfall, C Malbon Scan to access more free content 1Impact and Armour Group, ABSTRACT Department of Engineering and Introduction Behind armour blunt trauma (BABT) has Key messages Applied Science, Cranfield fi Defence and Security, Cranfield been de ned as a non-penetrating injury caused by the rapid deformation of body armour. There has been an University, Defence Academy of ▸ Non-perforating impacts on body armour can the United Kingdom, increasing awareness of BABT as an injury mechanism in result in a behind armour blunt trauma (BABT) Shrivenham, Wiltshire, UK both the military and civilian worlds; whether BABT 2 fi injury. Home Of ce Centre for results in serious injuries is debatable. Applied Science and ▸ Body armour standards typically describe the Method A systematic review of the openly accessible Technology, St Albans, measurement of back-face signature (BFS) in literature was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Hertfordshire, UK ‘clay’; BFS does not equate to a severity of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses method BABT injury in humans. Correspondence to to investigate those injuries classified as BABT and their ▸ There is no evidence of life-threatening BABT Dr D J Carr, Impact and severity. Armour Group, Department of injuries caused to people impacted against Results 50 sources were identified that included pertin- Engineering and Applied body armour designed to defeat the projectile Science, Cranfield Defence and ent information relevant to this systematic review on in question.
    [Show full text]
  • M a S T E R C a T a L
    YOU’LL WEAR IT.TM MASTER CATALOG QUALITY | COMFORT | VALUE “” YOU’LL WEAR IT! STEPHEN ARMELLINO PRESIDENT, CEO THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE. For more than 30 years, we at U.S. Armor have had the honor of outfitting the law enforcement and military communities with superior body armor and protective equipment. As former servicemen, officers or family members of both, myself and our dedicated team members take incredible pride and care in the design and construction of our armor and protective equipment. We are thankful for the opportunity to support you in serving us all. As you know, your armor is only effective if it’s worn and therefore, we have committed ourselves to producing the lightest, safest, and most dynamic armor. It is with your comfort and performance needs in mind that we select the most innovative, respected material suppliers and partners and seek to advance our offerings as applicable. While we solemnly ensure that our products are compliant with all applicable standards and requirements, our primary objective is to protect and support you, so you can focus on effectively doing your job. We thank you for your trust in us and in return, we promise to deliver superior body armor that you’ll comfortably wear. Sincerely, - STEPHEN ARMELLINO A HISTORY TO PROTECT U.S. ARMOR has provided superior body armor and He has taken his father’s protective products for more than three decades. Our designs into the 21st legacy dates back to Richard Armellino, Sr., father of century with U.S. Armor’s current U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • HONEYCOMB in HYBRID COMPOSITE ARMOR RESISTING DYNAMIC IMPACT by ADVAIT BHAT Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering Un
    HONEYCOMB IN HYBRID COMPOSITE ARMOR RESISTING DYNAMIC IMPACT By ADVAIT BHAT Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering University of Mumbai Mumbai, Maharashtra, India 2007 Master of Science in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 2009 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY JULY 2015 HONEYCOMB IN HYBRID COMPOSITE ARMOR RESISTING DYNAMIC IMPACT Dissertation approved: Dr. Jay C. Hanan Dissertation Adviser Dr. Sandip P. Harimkar Dr. Raman P. Singh Dr. Semra Peksoz Outside Committee Member ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank financial support for this work by MetCel LLC and the Helmerich Research Center through grants to the Oklahoma State University Foundation. Funding from the Oklahoma Center for Advancement and Technology - Oklahoma Applied Research Support (OCAST-OARS Award Nos. AR12.-041, AR 131-037) and the National Science Foundation (NSF Award No: 1214985) was critical for the project success. I thank my adviser Dr. Jay Hanan for his guidance and supervision during the entire span of this project. I express my deepest gratitude for his continuous motivation and patience during my academic endeavor at Oklahoma State University. I thank my outside committee member Dr. Semra Peksoz for being my mentor on body armor and familiarizing me with their design principles and prevalent test procedures. I gratefully thank Dr. Raman Singh and Dr. Sandip Harimkar for being on my dissertation committee. I extended my appreciation to the personnel from DSM Dyneema, The Safariland group, US Shooting Academy, and Leading Technology Composites for their assistance on ballistic tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Personal Ballistic Protection (PBP)
    Chapter 8 Contemporary Personal Ballistic Protection (PBP) Izabela Luiza Ciesielska-Wróbel Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69085 Abstract The review concerns existing contemporary protective equipment and their compo- nents serving against ballistic and non-ballistic threats of different sorts. The main focus, however, is on the personal ballistic protection (PBP) based on textile components and their role in the protective elements. Soft ballistic protections are crucial Soft ballistic protections are crucial elements of PBP, forexample in military and law enforcements. Although the subject of PBP was limited in this chapter to soft ballistic protection, other elements, e.g. hard ballistic protection, stab-resistant vests, dual threat, so-called in-con- junction protective elements, modern helmets, were also mentioned in this chapter to demonstrate positioning of the soft ballistic protection and other elements in the global personal protection approach. Apart from it, the chapter contains selected information concerning high-performance polymers and fibres as well as a brief notes about their application in protective panels being basic elements of any protective element. The final remarks concern the most up-to-date approach in relation to ballistic protection, which is immersing high-performance fibres into non-Newtonian liquid substances having the ability of ordering their chemical particles and changing into a high concentration and high segregation lattice under the influence of kinetic energy impact. Keywords: personal ballistic protection, soft body armour, hard body armour, dual threat, stab-resistant vests, bullet-resistant vests, protective panels, high-performance fibres 1. Introduction This chapter provides selected and the most up-to-date information concerning personal ballistic protection (PBP).
    [Show full text]
  • Protective Armor Engineering Design
    PROTECTIVE ARMOR ENGINEERING DESIGN PROTECTIVE ARMOR ENGINEERING DESIGN Magdi El Messiry Apple Academic Press Inc. Apple Academic Press Inc. 3333 Mistwell Crescent 1265 Goldenrod Circle NE Oakville, ON L6L 0A2 Palm Bay, Florida 32905 Canada USA USA © 2020 by Apple Academic Press, Inc. Exclusive worldwide distribution by CRC Press, a member of Taylor & Francis Group No claim to original U.S. Government works International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-77188-787-8 (Hardcover) International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-42905-723-6 (eBook) All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electric, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and re- cording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publish- er or its distributor, except in the case of brief excerpts or quotations for use in reviews or critical articles. This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reprinted material is quoted with permission and sources are indicated. Copyright for individual articles remains with the authors as indicated. A wide variety of references are listed. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the authors, editors, and the publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors, editors, and the publisher have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Piecing Together the Construction of Soft Body Armor
    By Jeannine Heinecke Piecing together the construction of soft body armor hen I started in law today’s soft body armor is becoming “W enforcement in the mid- a more sleek, comfortable, flexible, 1970s, the first vest I got looked life-protecting second skin for law and felt like a Manhattan Yellow enforcement officers. With this evo- Pages wrapped in a plastic bag,” lution comes improved wear rates describes Georg Olsen, a long-time and more lives saved. “Officers aren’t veteran of law enforcement and obstinate or stupid,” comments general manager of U.S. Armor, Olsen. “They want the protection, located in Cerritos, California. but they have to have the flexibility Through the evolution of ballistic and mobility to do their jobs.” fibers and construction methods, Part of finding the right protec- U.S. Armor’s Tactical Assault Vest (T.A.V.) and Terminal Velocity series vest. tion is making an educated deci- Wagner, manager of technology construction allows for faster ener- sion when purchasing soft body for Honeywell’s Advanced Fibers gy dissipation and reduced back- armor. Officers need to know and Composites Group. “It has face deformation — the energy that the types of fibers used, how a an orientation and regularity. The was not dissipated by the vest and vest should properly fit and the order of the molecular chains is will impact the body. advancements in construction aligned along the length of the Honeywell discovered this pro- methods leading to more fiber, which helps with the trans- cess not only works for HPPE comfortable, wearable vests.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection and Application Guide to Personal Body Armor NIJ Guide 100–01 (Update to NIJ Guide 100–98) U.S
    NOTICE Portions of this guide have been superseded by NCJ 247281, Selection and Application Guide to Ballistic-Resistant Body Armor For Law Enforcement, Corrections and Public Safety: NIJ Selection and Application Guide-0101.06. This new resource supersedes the portions of NIJ Guide 100-01 (NCJ 189633) that deal with ballistic-resistant armor. It does not supersede those portions that deal with stab-resistant armor. A separate guide on stab-resistant armor will be published when NIJ Standard-0115.00, Stab Resistance of Personal Body Armor (NCJ 183652), is updated. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Selection and Application Guide to Personal Body Armor NIJ Guide 100–01 (Update to NIJ Guide 100–98) U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh Street N.W. Washington, DC 20531 John Ashcroft Attorney General Deborah J. Daniels Assistant Attorney General Sarah V. Hart Director, National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice World Wide Web Site World Wide Web Site http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Selection and Application Guide to Personal Body Armor NIJ Guide 100–01 (Replaces Selection and Application Guide to Police Body Armor, NIJ Guide 100–98) November 2001 Published by: The National Institute of Justice’s National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center Lance Miller, Testing Manager P.O. Box 1160, Rockville, MD 20849–1160 800–248–2742; 301–519–5060 NCJ 189633 National Institute of Justice Sarah V.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletproof Vest and Its Improvement – a Review
    ISSN: 2455-2631 © January 2016 IJSDR | Volume 1, Issue 1 Bulletproof Vest and Its Improvement – A Review Naveen Kumar Department of Mechanical Engineering JIET, Jodhpur, India Abstract – The aim of this paper to study bulletproof vest. The material Kevlar, spectra shield, twaron are used in making bulletproof vest. History of armors used in many countries. Making of Kevlar and by using it making of bulletproof vest. Study and classification of bulletproof vests - Type I, Type IIA, Type II, Type IIIA, Type III, Type IV. Quality control and tests for vest like fiber and yarn tensile strength, the tensile strength of the resultant cloth Spectra is also tested for tensile strength by the manufacturer. Bulletproof vests are tested both wet and dry. This is done because the fibers used to make a vest perform differently when wet. Tests for check quality of jacket A. Ballistic testing V50 and V0 B. Military testing: fragment ballistics. We can improve performance by using grapheme. It can absorb more impact of bullet as compare to Kevlar. UHMWPE (Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene).Recently a new fabric developed at the University of California which can make sweat away from our skin. Bullet proof vest must be durable so Cardura can be used .for waterproofing we can use Gore-Tex. Dyneema is a waterproof material if we use we can make light weight bulletproof vest as it doesn’t require waterproofing. Keywords – Kevlar, spectra, twaron, UHMWPE, Dyneema ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ I. Introduction Bulletproof vest is a vest which can protect wearer’s body from the impact of bullet. This vest can’t bear the total impact of bullet but it can bear most of the impact of bullet.
    [Show full text]
  • Fm 90-40 (515
    ARMY, MARINE CORPS, NAVY NLW ORPS C CO NE M I B R A A T M MULTISERVICE PROCEDURES D FOR THE E D V N TACTICAL EMPLOYMENT OF E A L O M P M NONLETHAL WEAPONS MENT CO FM 90-40 MCRP 3-15.8 NWP 3-07.31 USCG PUB 3-07.31 AIR LAND SEA OCTOBER 1998 APPLICATION CENTER DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. MULTISERVICE TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES FOREWORD This publication has been prepared under our direction for use by our respective commands and other commands as appropriate. WILLIAM W. HARTZOG J. E. RHODES General, USA Lieutenant General, USMC Commander Commanding General Training and Doctrine Command Marine Corps Combat Development Command G. S. HOLDER Rear Admiral, USN Commander Naval Doctrine Command PREFACE 1. Scope employment of NLW during exercises and contingencies. This publication describes multiservice tactics, techniques, and procedures (MTTP) b. The United States (US) Army, for consideration and use during the Marine Corps, Navy, and Coast Guard tactical employment of nonlethal weapons approved this multiservice publication. (NLW) in support of warfighting personnel conducting training and tactical operations. 4. Implementation Plan This publication— Participating service command offices a. Provides an overview of NLW. of primary responsibility (OPRs) will review this publication, validate the b. Provides NLW system description/ information, and reference and incorporate interoperability. it in service manuals, regulations, and curricula as follows: c. Describes the capabilities of NLW. Army. The Army will incorporate the d. Discusses training with the NLW procedures in this publication in US Army capability set. training and doctrinal publications as directed by the commander, US Army e.
    [Show full text]
  • Shattered World: Players Guide a GURPS 4Th Edition Campaign Outline
    Shattered World: Players Guide A GURPS 4th edition campaign outline Suggested supplements ● Basic set ● High Tech ● Low Tech ● Pyramid 3-64, Spaceships 7 (primary inspiration for airship design and statistics) ​ ​ ● Pyramid 3-44, Alternate GURPS II, “Appendix Z: Survivable Guns" ​ ​ ​ ​ ● Supers: Vehicles as powers (p S84) + No School Grognard; Easier Armor Design (Mecha suits) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Outline Campaign TL 6^ Semi-hard-Realism and Heroic-Raygun-Gothic Action-Adventure Airth was once a world much like ours, in approximately the leading edge of the 20th century. It had civilized lands of modern nations, rich histories decorated with artists and artisans, religion, politics and rampant urbanization. Ideology and doctrine rose up to conflagrate the age old border disputes and national tensions until full fledged war broke out. Armies marched to the front lines, ponderous mecha belching diesel fumes, and the forces clashing on battlefields of barbed wire, mud, and misery. Until One night, with the shadow of another day’s bloody dawn rising, there came a shuddering rumble and a flash of light. Millions of dancing colors scintillated in the black sky, throwing ghostly shadows dancing, and the earth shook below. The front lines of armies shattered and scattered, the borders redrew in an instant, and the continents themselves buckled and heaved. The great spine of the world snapped under the weight of war and strife. The very Airth died that fateful night. The Cataclysm broke the world open, and scattered the land itself to the heavens. In the aftermath of the mysterious ​ explosions, entire swaths of continents found themselves flying through the air, hovering over a hollow earth, the oceans and plains falling away to the cavernous planet below.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8.490,212 B1 Asher Et Al
    USOO8490212B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8.490,212 B1 Asher et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 23, 2013 (54) QUICK RELEASE GARMENT 4,697.285 A 10/1987 Sylvester 5,060,314 A 10, 1991 Lewis 5,259,093 A 11/1993 D'Annunzio (75) Inventors: Matthew Asher, Imperial, MO (US); 5,331,683 A * 7/1994 Stone et al. ........................ 2.25 Carl James Quinlan, Maysville, NC 5,495,621 A 3, 1996 Kibbee (US) 5,512.348 A 4/1996 Mazelsky 5,516,234 A 5/1996 Duchesne (73) Assignee: Eagle Industries Unlimited, Inc., 5,785,0115,724,707 A 7/19983, 1998 Gitterman,Kirk et al. III Fenton, MO (US) 5,806.740 A 9/1998 Carlson 5,897,468 A 4/1999 Lumpkin (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 5,966,747 A 10/1999 Crupi et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 93.9 A 538 aXOal. U.S.C. 154(b) by 1899 days. 6,098,196 A 8/2000 Logan 6,138,277 A * 10/2000 Gillen et al. ...................... 2,102 (21) Appl. No.: 11/671,068 6,164.048 A 12/2000 Rhodes 6,185,738 B1 2/2001 Sidebottom (22) Filed: Feb. 5, 2007 6,308,334 B1 10/2001 Maas 6.421,833 B2 7/2002 Khanamirian et al. (51) Int. Cl. (Continued) (52) it.to: (2006.01) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Src.w. 2/2.5: 2/462 CA 642244 6, 1962 (58) Field of Classification Search OTHER PUBLICATIONS S. licati - - - - - file? - - - - - - - - - - i.
    [Show full text]