DOCSLIB.ORG

The Execution of German Deserters by Surrendered German Troops Under Canadian Control in Amsterdam, May 1945 Chris Madsen University of Victoria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Execution of German Deserters by Surrendered German Troops Under Canadian Control in Amsterdam, May 1945 Chris Madsen University of Victoria Canadian Military History Volume 2 | Issue 1 Article 8 1-23-2012 Victims of Circumstance: the Execution of German Deserters by Surrendered German Troops Under Canadian Control in Amsterdam, May 1945 Chris Madsen University of Victoria Recommended Citation Madsen, Chris (1993) "Victims of Circumstance: the Execution of German Deserters by Surrendered German Troops Under Canadian Control in Amsterdam, May 1945," Canadian Military History: Vol. 2: Iss. 1, Article 8. Available at: http://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh/vol2/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Madsen: Victims of Circumstance: the Execution of German Deserters by Sur Victims of Circumstance: The Execution of German Deserters by Surrendered German Troops Under Canadian Control in Amsterdam, May 1945 Chris Madsen Introduction German commanders and military judges continued to apply an irregular military law n the morning of 13 May 1945, five days against deserters; and Canadian restrictions Oafter the formal capitulation of Hitler's on these actions remained limited and hesitant. Wehrmacht, a German military court delivered In this situation, larger political and strategic death sentences on two German naval considerations worked against deserters like deserters, Bruno Dorfer and Rainer Beck. The Dorfer and Beck. Canadian reactions, during trial occurred in an abandoned Ford assembly and twenty-one years after the execution, plant on the outskirts of Amsterdam, a site reflected a sad record of indifference and used by the Canadian army for the callousness for these unfortunate victims of concentration of German naval personneL Later latent Nazism. that same day, a German firing squad, supplied with captured German rifles and a three-ton Background truck from the Seaforth Highlanders of Canada and escorted by Canadian Captain Robert K. he strategic situation in North-West Swinton, executed the two German prisoners T Europe became quite curious at the end of of war a short distance outside the enclosure. 1 the Second World War. Canadian and British Dorfer and Beck were among the last victims of advances into the Netherlands and Germany a military legal system distorted by the Nazi effectively cut off German military forces in state. At the time no one, Canadian or German, Western Holland.2 The Twenty-Fifth German questioned the justice of the event. Army, under the command of Generaloberst Johannes von Blaskowitz. retreated into a This tragic incident demonstrated a fortified area between the Maas and Waal disturbing degree of cooperation between Rivers in the south and the Grebbe Line in the Canadian military units and the defeated east. This "Festung Holland" contained German military. Why did German deserters approximately 150,000 German soldiers.3 A like Dorfer and Beck continue to die after the composite garrison of German army and naval end of the war? The executions were a matter formations awaited the final collapse of the of convenience. The Canadian military allowed German armed forces. The German military's the German military structure to function after threat to destroy Holland's extensive dyke the capitulation. Under this questionable systems and flood the fertile countryside arrangement, the German armed forces in prevented further advances of Canadian Holland disarmed, concentrated, and evacuated military units.4 Consequently, battle-lines in themselves. To accomplish this gigantic task the Netherlands remained relatively constant. in an orderly and disciplined way, Canadian These conditions provided a basis for agreement military authorities mistakenly relied on the between Canadian and German military vanquished German military leadership. leadership. On 28 April 1945. Lieutenant- 93 Published by Scholars Commons @ Laurier, 1993 1 Canadian Military History, Vol. 2 [1993], Iss. 1, Art. 8 The surrender of German forces in the Netherlands, I Canadian Corps HQ, 5 May 1945. (Photo: Alex M. Stirton, NAC PA 133321) General Charles Foulkes, commander of I Crerar, through Foulkes, issued detailed Canadian Corps, and Blaskowitz concluded a instructions to Blaskowitz for implementation makeshift armistice for feeding the Dutch of this surrender in the Netherlands. The civilian population. Under Operation "Faust," document made the German general Canadian truck convoys drove through German responsible "for all GERMAN Armed Forces lines, merchant ships sailed for major Dutch (including German Navy, Army, Air Forces), ports, and Allied bombers dropped food rations. 5 auxiliaries and civilians"7 within Blaskowitz's In this way, the First Canadian Army, under sphere of control. Meanwhile, the signing of General Harry Crerar, began an enduring the unconditional surrender by German working relationship with the German military plenipotentiaries at Rheims on 7 May 1945, to administration in Holland. On 5 May 1945, take effect the next day, formally ended the Field Marshal Bernard L. Montgomery, Third Reich. commander of the 21st British Army Group, accepted from Generaladmiral Hans Georg von By the time of the final capitulation, Friedeburg "the surrender of all German forces Canadian military forces were not yet inside in Holland, in northwest Germany including German-occupied Holland. At 2300 hours on the Frisian Islands, and Heligoland and all 7 May 1945, the Seaforth Highlanders of other islands, in Schleswig-Holstein, and in Canada, a regiment of the 1st Canadian Infantry Denmark. "6 At the small town ofWageningen, Division, received orders to proceed forward: 94 http://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh/vol2/iss1/8 2 Madsen: Victims of Circumstance: the Execution of German Deserters by Sur "Instead of going to HAARLEM we are now to go Nevertheless, the German military remained to AMSTERDAM and will be the first unit to a potent force within Holland. The Germans travel into the newly liberated area. "8 During still controlled large sections of the Dutch the next few days, Canadian military units administrative, communication, and slowly moved towards designated occupation transportation infrastructures. Many Dutch zones within Holland. Enthusiastic Dutch civilians "could not understand, during the crowds swamped Canadian columns at every first few days, a situation where armed crossroad along inward routes. Lieutenant­ Canadian soldiers were going up one side of the Colonel H.P. Bell-Irving, the commander of the road and armed Germans going down the other Seaforth Highlanders, described the Canadian side, neither interfering with the other. "10 entry into Amsterdam: German military formations carried on with regular duties under the surrender agreement. The universal happiness amounted to an ecstasy Until further Canadian instructions, which I have never seen even approached in any Blaskowitz's headquarters remained crowd before. Before this, few of our men could have "responsible for the maintenance and discipline given a clear reason why they came ... But here in 11 Amsterdam, in one day, all that was changed ... ofallGermantroopsinWESTERNHOLLAND." Every life lost. every long day away from home, had At times, the vengeful activities of Nederlandse been spent in a good and necessary endeavour.9 Binnenlandse Strydkrachten (NBS), or Dutch Interior Forces, impinged on this practical The Dutch population greeted Canadian arrangement. The Canadians found "a country soldiers as liberators; Holland was once again whose friendly people and resistance forces are a free country. The arrival of Canadian military lusting to see the last of the Germans."12 forces officially ended five long years of German Anything German became a target; the NBS rule. Disarmed German soldiers move towards concentration areas. (Piwto: Alex M. Stirton/NAC PA 151928) 95 Published by Scholars Commons @ Laurier, 1993 3 Canadian Military History, Vol. 2 [1993], Iss. 1, Art. 8 declared open season on German soldiers found However, the cooperation and organization alone on Amsterdam streets. Thus, the of the German military greatly aided Canadian Germans gained safety in numbers, and efforts. For the most part, German military retained weapons for protection: "There was formations remained intact and functional. At some trouble in the "D" Company sector of the Julianadorp, the Germans "marched in fully town-some Dutch got into a boat and armed, wheeled into the airfield along one road attempted to shoot up a German concentration and halted."18 Canadian soldiers merely area. The fire was returned by the Germans. "13 collected and stacked German weapons. Sporadic outbursts ofviolence erupted between German war material was sorted, stored, and the two heavily armed groups. The German guarded, pending final destruction or military structure therefore represented an distribution to Allied military and civil sources. 19 element of order in a potentially explosive and In many instances, German military formations chaotic situation. disarmed themselves, and moved unescorted towards selected Canadian prison camps and concentration areas. Canadian military units Concentration and the NBS secured ammunition dumps and munitions storage areas left behind by German major priority of Canadian military units military forces inAmsterdam.20 Thus, German A in Amsterdam was the disarming and assistance became indispensable in disarming concentration of German military personnel. and concentrating German
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Militärgerichtsbarkeit in Österreich (Circa 1850–1945)
    BRGÖ 2016 Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs Martin MOLL, Graz Militärgerichtsbarkeit in Österreich (circa 1850–1945) Military jurisdiction in Austria, ca. 1850–1945 This article starts around 1850, a period which saw a new codification of civil and military penal law with a more precise separation of these areas. Crimes committed by soldiers were now defined parallel to civilian ones. However, soldiers were still tried before military courts. The military penal code comprised genuine military crimes like deser- tion and mutiny. Up to 1912 the procedure law had been archaic as it did not distinguish between the state prosecu- tor and the judge. But in 1912 the legislature passed a modern military procedure law which came into practice only weeks before the outbreak of World War I, during which millions of trials took place, conducted against civilians as well as soldiers. This article outlines the structure of military courts in Austria-Hungary, ranging from courts responsible for a single garrison up to the Highest Military Court in Vienna. When Austria became a republic in November 1918, military jurisdiction was abolished. The authoritarian government of Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuß reintroduced martial law in late 1933; it was mainly used against Social Democrats who staged the February 1934 uprising. After the National Socialist ‘July putsch’ of 1934 a military court punished the rioters. Following Aus- tria’s annexation to Germany in 1938, German military law was introduced in Austria. After the war’s end in 1945, these Nazi remnants were abolished, leaving Austria without any military jurisdiction. Keywords: Austria – Austria as part of Hitler’s Germany –First Republic – Habsburg Monarchy – Military Jurisdiction Einleitung und Themenübersicht allen Staaten gab es eine eigene, von der zivilen Justiz getrennte Strafgerichtsbarkeit des Militärs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of an Internationally Codified Denial of the Defense of Superior Orders
    xv The Rise and Fall of an Internationally Codified Denial of the Defense of Superior Orders 30 Revue De Droit Militaire Et De Droit De LA Guerre 183 (1991) Introduction s long as there have been trials for violations of the laws and customs of A war, more popularly known as "war crimes trials", the trial tribunals have been confronted with the defense of "superior orders"-the claim that the accused did what he did because he was ordered to do so by a superior officer (or by his Government) and that his refusal to obey the order would have brought dire consequences upon him. And as along as there have been trials for violations of the laws and customs ofwar the trial tribunals have almost uniformly rejected that defense. However, since the termination of the major programs of war crimes trials conducted after World War II there has been an ongoing dispute as to whether a plea of superior orders should be allowed, or disallowed, and, if allowed, the criteria to be used as the basis for its application. Does international action in this area constitute an invasion of the national jurisdiction? Should the doctrine apply to all war crimes or only to certain specifically named crimes? Should the illegality of the order received be such that any "reasonable" person would recognize its invalidity; or should it be such as to be recognized by a person of"ordinary sense and understanding"; or by a person ofthe "commonest understanding"? Should it be "illegal on its face"; or "manifesdy illegal"; or "palpably illegal"; or of "obvious criminality,,?1 An inability to reach a generally acceptable consensus on these problems has resulted in the repeated rejection of attempts to legislate internationally in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbreviations Used in Notes and Bibliography
    Abbreviations Used in Notes and Bibliography AUA-M Air University Archive, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama ANL Archives Nationales Luxembourg BaB Bundesarchiv Berlin BaMF Bundesarchiv Militärarchiv Freiburg BaZnsA Bundesarchiv Zentralnachweisestelle Aachen GHM German History Museum Berlin HsaD Hauptstaatsarchiv Düsseldorf HasH Hauptstaatsarchiv Hannover HSaM Hessisches Staatsarchiv Marburg HStAWi Hauptstaatsarchiv Wiesbaden HIADL Hoover Institute Archives, Stanford Library, Daniel Lerner Collection IWML Imperial War Museum London IfZM Institut für Zeitgeschichte München IMTN International Military Tribunal Nuremberg LaSaar Landesarchiv Saarland LaSpey Landesarchiv Speyer LWVH Landeswohlfahrtsverband Hessen MHAP Military Historical Archive, Prague NAA National Archives of Australia NAL National Archives Kew Gardens, London NAW National Archives Washington D.C. OKaW Österreichisches Kriegsarchiv Wein ÖStA Österreichisches Staatsarchiv Vienna PMGO Provost Marshall General’s Office (U.S.A) SaL Staatsarchiv Ludwigsburg SaW Staatsarchiv Würzburg SAB State Archive Bydgoszcz, Poland TBJG Elke Frölich, Die Tagbücher von Joseph Goebbels: Im Auftrag des Institute für Zeitsgeschichte und mit Unterstützung des Staatlichen Archivdienstes Rußlands. Teil II Dikate 1941–1945 (Münich 1995–1996). WLC Weiner Library Collection 191 Notes Introduction: Sippenhaft, Terror and Fear: The Historiography of the Nazi Terror State 1 . Christopher Hutton, Race and the Third Reich: Linguistics, Racial Anthropology and Genetics in the Third Reich (Cambridge 2005), p. 18. 2 . Rosemary O’Kane, Terror, Force and States: The Path from Modernity (Cheltham 1996), p. 19. O’Kane defines a system of terror, as one that is ‘distinguished by summary justice, where the innocence or guilt of the victims is immaterial’. 3 . See Robert Thurston, ‘The Family during the Great Terror 1935–1941’, Soviet Studies , 43, 3 (1991), pp. 553–74.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Ranks
    WHO WILL SERVE? EDUCATION, LABOR MARKETS, AND MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY by Lindsay P. Cohn Department of Political Science Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Peter D. Feaver, Supervisor ___________________________ David Soskice ___________________________ Christopher Gelpi ___________________________ Tim Büthe ___________________________ Alexander B. Downes Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2007 ABSTRACT WHO WILL SERVE? EDUCATION, LABOR MARKETS, AND MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY by Lindsay P. Cohn Department of Political Science Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Peter D. Feaver, Supervisor ___________________________ David Soskice ___________________________ Christopher Gelpi ___________________________ Tim Büthe ___________________________ Alexander B. Downes An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2007 Copyright by Lindsay P. Cohn 2007 Abstract Contemporary militaries depend on volunteer soldiers capable of dealing with advanced technology and complex missions. An important factor in the successful recruiting, retention, and employment of quality personnel is the set of personnel policies which a military has in place. It might be assumed that military policies on personnel derive solely from the functional necessities of the organization’s mission, given that the stakes of military effectiveness are generally very high. Unless the survival of the state is in jeopardy, however, it will seek to limit defense costs, which may entail cutting into effectiveness. How a state chooses to make the tradeoffs between effectiveness and economy will be subject to influences other than military necessity.
    [Show full text]
  • Obeying Orders: Atrocity, Military Discipline, and the Law of War
    California Law Review VOL. 86 OCTOBER 1998 No. 5 Copyright © 1998 by California Law Review, Inc. Obeying Orders: Atrocity, Military Discipline, and the Law of War Mark J. Osielt TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................... 944 General Background ......................................................................... 946 A. Genealogy of Terms ............................................................. 951 B. "Cracking the Culture" of the "Separate Community" ...... 953 C. Civilian and Military Approaches to Legal Error ................... 959 D. Current Law as Compromise ................................................. 961 E. Why Ever Excuse Obedience to Illegal Orders? ............ .. .......965 I. Obedience to Superior Orders: The Uncertain Scope of Manifest Illegality ....................................................................... 969 A. The Nature of the Defense .................................................... 971 Copyright © 1998 California Law Review, Inc. t Mark J. Osiel, Professor of Law, University of Iowa. J.D., Ph.D., Harvard University, 1987. For their helpful comments, I would like to thank Steven Burton, Eliot A. Cohen, Mary Dudziak, Sir Michael Howard, Kenneth Kress, Col. Howard Levie, Lt. Col. Mark Martins, John Norton Moore, Maj. Gen. A.P.V. Rogers, Tina Rosenberg, Col. Scott Silliman, Robert F. Turner, Detlev Vagts, Lea Vandervelde, and the participants in faculty seminars at Stanford and the University of Iowa. Conversations with several leading Judge Advocate General (hereinafter JAG) officers and civilian Defense Department lawyers, whose anonymity must be preserved, proved invaluable. Discussions with Carlos Nino and Jaime Malamud-Goti, while they were prosecuting officers for crimes arising from Argentina's "dirty war," were also very helpful. I am grateful to several members of legal academia who were willing, on condition of anonymity, to share some rather unflattering tales of their own military activities during World War II and the Korean War.
    [Show full text]
  • Obedience of Orders and the Law of War: Judicial Application in American Forums Gary D
    American University International Law Review Volume 15 | Issue 2 Article 4 1999 Obedience of Orders and the Law of War: Judicial Application in American Forums Gary D. Solis Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Solis, Gary D. "Obedience of Orders and the Law of War: Judicial Application in American Forums." American University International Law Review 15, no. 2 (1999): 481-526. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OBEDIENCE OF ORDERS AND THE LAW OF WAR: JUDICIAL APPLICATION IN AMERICAN FORUMS GARY D. SOLIS* INTRODUCTION .............................................. 482 I. HISTORICAL ANTECEDENTS ............................ 484 A. JUDICIALLY DECLARED: A FIRST MILITARY STANDARD .... 487 B. THE CIVIL WAR: AMERICA'S INITIAL LAW OF WAR M ANUAL .................................................. 491 C. THE TWENTIETH CENTURY: AN EVOLVING STANDARD ..... 492 D. WORLD WAR I: THE UNITED STATES STANDARD NOT IN EVIDENCE ................................................ 496 E. THE AMERICAN STANDARD: A GENESIS? .... 504 F. WORLD WAR II: AN OLD NEW STANDARD ................. 506 G. THE NUREMBERG IMT: THE "NEW" STANDARD APPLIED... 514 H. NUREMBERG'S "SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS" ............. 517 II. MANIFEST ILLEGALITY: CONTINUING INTERPRETIVE DIFFICULTY ............................. 520 A. MERE EVIDENCE OR COMPLETE DEFENSE? MISTAKE OF LAW OR MISTAKE OF FACT? . 521 B. OBEDIENCE TO ORDERS: ELSEWHERE AND LATER .........
    [Show full text]
  • Military Law Review, Vol. 57
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PAMPHLET 27-100-57 REVIEW VOL. 57 Perspective THE MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL--1984 THE GERMAN MILITARY LEGAL SYSTEM Articles THE CONSTITUTION, THE UNITED STATES COURT OF MILITARY APPEALS AND THE FUTURE MY LA1 AND VIETNAM: NORMS, MYTHS AND LEADER RESPONSIBILITY Recent Developments Book Reviews HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SUMMER 1972 MILITARY LAW REVIEW The Military Law Review provides a forum for those inter- ested in military law to share the product of their experience and research. Articles should be of direct concern and import in this area of scholarship, and preference will be given to those articles having lasting value as reference material for the military lawyer. The Military Law Review does not purport to promulgate De- partment of the Army policy or to be in any sense directory. The opinions reflected in each article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Judge Advocate General or any governmental agency. SUBMISSION OF ARTICLES: Articles, comments, recent de- velopment notes, and book reviews should be submitted in duplicate, triple spaced, to the Editor, Military Law Review, The Judge Advocate General’s School, U. S. Army, Charlottes- ville, Virginia 22901. Footnotes should be triple spaced and appear as a separate appendix at the end of the text. Citations should conform to the Uniform System of Citation (11th edition 1967), copyrighted by the Columbia, Harvard, and University of Pennsylvania Law Reviews and the Yale Law Journal. SUBSCRIPTIONS AND BACK ISSUES: Interested persons should contact the Superintendent of Documents, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
    [Show full text]
  • Rigg Bm.Pdf (651.5Kb)
    notes note on sources Although oral testimonies are subject to fallible human memories, they have none- theless proven invaluable in explaining several documents collected for this study. Documents never before seen by historians, found in people’s closets, basements, and desk drawers, created a much fuller and complex history, especially when their owners supplied the background and history of the documents as well. These sources helped re-create the unique and tragic history of the Mischlinge, which is still so little understood over half a century later. The thousands of pages of documents and oral testimonies (on 8 mm video and VHS video) in this study are now part of the permanent collection at the Bundesarchiv-Militärarchiv in Freiburg, Germany, as the Bryan Mark Rigg Collection. Although interviews need to be treated with some skepticism, they have repeatedly shown that oral history often enriches rather than contradicts historical documents. All too often, history is written without the human element, that is, without knowing what these people thought, felt, and believed. Oral history helps reconstruct many of these people’s thoughts, feelings, and beliefs through their diaries, letters, interviews, and photographs. In this way, a healthy combination of hard documents or primary sources and secondary sources and testimonies expands our sense of this history. Often one reads about men and women but feels no human connection with them. The interviews were done to try to bridge this gap and to pro- vide readers with the means to enter these men’s and women’s thoughts and feelings to understand them better and to deepen readers’ knowledge of this history.
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalyst for the Development of Human Rights: German Internment Practices in the First World War, 1914-1929
    A Catalyst for the Development of Human Rights: German Internment Practices in the First World War, 1914-1929 Alison Marie Vick Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In History Heather Gumbert (Co-chair) Robert Stephens (Co-chair) Glenn Bugh David Cline May 6, 2013 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Germany, prisoners of war, First World War, human rights, international law Copyright 2013 A Catalyst for the Development of Human Rights: German Internment Practices in the First World War, 1914-1929 Alison Marie Vick ABSTRACT This thesis is a transnational study of the military actions and responses related to prisoners of war in World War I. Building on the works human rights scholars, I explore the how the collective rights afforded to prisoners of war under the 1906 Geneva Convention and 1907 Hague Convention served as a precursor to the concept of human rights that emerged after World War II. I argue that German military treated prisoners of war according to national interest, rather than international law. Specifically, I explore how the concepts of “military necessity” and “reciprocity” drove German internment practices, and how German internment practices escalated in violence during the last two years of the war. The violent practices committed by the Germans against prisoners of war produced an international demand to hold the perpetrators of wartime atrocities accountable for their actions in the postwar period. Acknowledgements This thesis was possible because of the help and encouragement of many supportive individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Despatches Vol 43, Jan 2021
    Military Despatches Vol 43 January 2021 Not a military genius Ten of Hitler’s biggest mistakes Feared and respected Three World War II British legends You are what you eat Military ration packs from around the world Operation Babylon Iraq’s nuclear reactor - now you see it, now you don’t For the military enthusiast CONTENTS January 2021 Page 12 Click on any video below to view How much do you know about movie theme songs? Take our quiz and find out. Hipe’s Wouter de The old South African Goede interviews former Defence Force used 28’s gang boss David a mixture of English, Williams. Afrikaans, slang and techno-speak that few Special Forces - Irish Special Forces outside the military could hope to under- 32 stand. Some of the terms Features were humorous, some You want how much? were clever, while others 6 When pirates kidnapped Julius were downright crude. Ten of Hitler’s biggest mis- Caesar he laughed at their ran- som demands and told them to takes ask for a lot more. We look at 10 reasons why Hit- Part of Hipe’s “On the ler was not a military genius. 34 couch” series, this is an 18 Survival interview with one of We take a look a making fire. Sign of the times author Herman Charles 37 Helmet graffiti during the Viet- Bosman’s most famous nam War. Ranks characters, Oom Schalk 20 Ranks of the Irish Defence Forc- Lourens. es. A taxi driver was shot Hipe spent time in The perils of being a German Hanover Park, an area 28 dead in an ongoing General Quiz war between rival taxi plagued with gang Being one of Hitler’s general Surviving the Arctic convoys organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • RACE, RAPE and GENDER in NAZI-OCCUPIED TERRITORIES a Dissertation Submitted to Kent State University in Partial Fulfillment Of
    RACE, RAPE AND GENDER IN NAZI-OCCUPIED TERRITORIES A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Monika J. Flaschka December, 2009 Dissertation written by Monika J. Flaschka B.S., University of Arizona, 1997 M.A., Kent State University, 2001 M.A., Kent State University, 2004 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2009 Approved by ___________________________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Richard Steigmann-Gall ___________________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Geoffrey Giles ___________________________________ Shelley Baranowski ___________________________________ Elizabeth Smith-Pryor ___________________________________ Kristen Marcussen Accepted by _______________________________________, Chair, Department of History Kenneth Bindas _______________________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences John Stalvey ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................v CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................1 Historiography .........................................................................................................4 From German to Nazi Ideologies ..........................................................................27 Analytical Framework and Purpose .......................................................................31 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • Adolf Eichmann
    Judgment 1. The Appellant, Adolf Eichmann, was found guilty by the District Court of Jerusalem of offences of the most extreme gravity against the Nazis and Nazi Collaborators (Punishment) Law 5710-1950 (hereinafter - "the Law") and was sentenced to death. These offences may be divided into four groups: Group One: Crimes against the Jewish People, contrary to Section I(a) (1) of the Law;Group Two: Crimes against Humanity, contrary to Section 1(a) (2);Group Three: War Crimes, contrary to Section 1(a) (3); Group Four: Membership of Hostile Organizations, contrary to Section 3. 2. The acts constituting these offences, which the Court attributed to the Appellant, have been specified in paragraph 244 of the Judgment. The acts belonging to Group One are: (1) That during the period from August 1941 to May 1945, in Germany, in the territories of the Axis States, and in the areas which were subject to the authority of Germany and the Axis States, he, together with others, caused the deaths of millions of Jews, with the purpose of implementing the plan which was known as `the Final Solution of the Jewish Question,' with intent to exterminate the Jewish People; (2) that during that period and in the same places he, together with others, subjected millions of Jews to living conditions which were likely to bring about their physical destruction, in order to implement the said plan, with intent to exterminate the Jewish People; (3) that during that period and in the same places he, together with others, caused grave bodily and mental harm to millions
    [Show full text]