NeuroRegulation
The Official Journal of .
Volume 8, Number 1, 2021
NeuroRegulation
Editor-in-Chief Rex L. Cannon, PhD: SPESA Research Institute, Knoxville, TN, USA
Executive Editor Nancy L. Wigton, PhD: 1) Grand Canyon University, Phoenix, AZ, USA; 2) Applied Neurotherapy Center, Tempe, AZ, USA
Associate Editors Scott L. Decker, PhD: University of South Carolina, Department of Psychology, Columbia, SC, USA Jon A. Frederick, PhD: Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, USA Genomary Krigbaum, PsyD: University of Wyoming, Family Medicine Residency, Casper, WY, USA Randall Lyle, PhD: Mount Mercy University, Cedar Rapids, IA, USA Tanya Morosoli, MSc: 1) Clínica de Neuropsicología Diagnóstica y Terapéutica, Mexico City, Mexico; 2) ECPE, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA Sarah Prinsloo, PhD: MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA Deborah Simkin, MD: 1) Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Atlanta, GA, USA; 2) Attention, Memory, and Cognition Center, Destin, FL, USA Estate M. Sokhadze, PhD: University of South Carolina, School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC, USA Larry C. Stevens, PhD: Northern Arizona University, Department of Psychological Services, Flagstaff, AZ, USA Tanju Surmeli, MD: Living Health Center for Research and Education, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey
Production Editor Jacqueline Luk Paredes, Phoenix, AZ, USA
NeuroRegulation (ISSN: 2373-0587) is published quarterly by the International Society for Neurofeedback and Research (ISNR), 13876 SW 56th Street, PMB 311, Miami, FL 33175-6021, USA.
Copyright NeuroRegulation is open access with no submission fees or APC (Author Processing Charges). This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the CC BY license. The use, distribution, or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution, or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. The journal is indexed in the Abstracting & Indexing databases of Scopus, Elsevier’s Embase, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and Google Scholar and carries a CiteScore impact factor from Scopus.
Aim and Scope NeuroRegulation is a peer-reviewed journal providing an integrated, multidisciplinary perspective on clinically relevant research, treatment, and public policy for neurofeedback, neuroregulation, and neurotherapy. The journal reviews important findings in clinical neurotherapy, biofeedback, and electroencephalography for use in assessing baselines and outcomes of various procedures. The journal draws from expertise inside and outside of the International Society for Neurofeedback and Research to deliver material which integrates the diverse aspects of the field. Instructions for submissions and Author Guidelines can be found on the journal website (http://www.neuroregulation.org). NeuroRegulation http://www.isnr.org
Volume 8, Number 1
2021
Contents
RESEARCH PAPERS
Short-Form, Comedy Improv Affects the Functional Connectivity in the Brain of Adolescents with 2 Complex Developmental Trauma as Measured by qEEG: A Single Group Pilot Study Mary DeMichele and Scott Kuenneke
Analysis of the Quality of Diet and Academic Performance in Rural Primary School Students 14 Pedro José Carrillo-López, Andrés Rosa Guillamón, Eliseo García Cantó, José Enrique Moral García, and Juan José Pérez Soto
RESEARCH PROTOCOLS
Is There Evidence for EEG-Neurofeedback Specificity in the Treatment of Internalizing Disorders? A 22 Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Tyson Michael Perez, Paul Glue, Divya B Adhia, Jerin Mathew, and Dirk De Ridder
SPECIAL FEATURES
Presession Posterior Alpha Enhancement May Accelerate Neurofeedback Learning and Response 29 Revital Yonah
Avoid Zoom Fatigue, Be Present and Learn 47 Erik Peper, Vietta Wilson, Marc Martin, Erik Rosegard, and Richard Harvey
CLINICAL CORNER
The Road Less Traveled: Integrating Neurotherapy with Holistic Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 57 After Severe Head Injury Mohammed Afsar, Nishita Choudhari, Dhaval Shukla, and Jamuna Rajeswara
CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMENTARY
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Decreasing Gambling Craving in Patients 69 with Gambling Disorder: A Call for Advanced Clinical Investigations Chidiebere Emmanuel Okechukwu
1 | www.neuroregulation.org Vol. 8(1):1 2021
NeuroRegulation http://www.isnr.org
Short-Form, Comedy Improv Affects the Functional Connectivity in the Brain of Adolescents with Complex Developmental Trauma as Measured by qEEG: A Single Group Pilot Study Mary DeMichele* and Scott Kuenneke Neuro Feedback Department, Calo Programs, Lake Ozark, Missouri, USA
Abstract Complex developmental trauma (CDT) is characterized by prolonged exposure to traumatic events in early life, resulting in the breakdown of neurobiological integration which impacts mental and physical health. The benefits of practicing short-form improvisation (improv), however, parallel the treatment needs of this population. To observe the neurobiological effect of improv, we used eyes-open quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) to record the brains of 32 adolescents before and after participation in a 20-min intervention (One Rule Improv) consisting of short-form improv games. A paired t-test was used to evaluate coherence, phase, absolute amplitude, and low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). Results indicated increases in coherence in delta, theta, alpha, and beta (p < .05). Phase lag showed a statistical decrease (p < .05) in delta, alpha, and beta. Absolute power showed significant increases in alpha frontally Fp1 (p = .004), decreases in delta (p = .030) at T4. LORETA analysis indicated significant changes in sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) at Brodmann area (BA) 6, t(27) = 6.1, p < .05. Significant delta decreased at BA 6, BA 10, t(27) = 4.96, p < .05; and BA 24, t(27) = 3.90. Significant delta decreased at BA 4, BA 3, and BA 40, t(27) = 4.35, p < .05. Results indicate preliminary evidence supporting improv as an intervention capable of affecting functional connectivity changes in adolescents with CDT. For developmental trauma, these results may indicate improved capacity to make meaningful connections with others and create opportunities for neuroplastic changes.
Keywords: functional connectivity; complex developmental trauma; improv; alternative therapies; adolescents with trauma; improvisational theater
Citation: DeMichele, M., & Kuenneke, S. (2021). Short-form, comedy improv affects the functional connectivity in the brain of adolescents with complex developmental trauma as measured by qEEG: A single group pilot study. NeuroRegulation, 8(1), 2 13. https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.8.1.2 *Address correspondence to: M. DeMichele, MSSc, P.O. Box Edited by: 1941, Lake Ozark, MO 65049, USA. Email: Rex L. Cannon, PhD, SPESA Research Institute, Knoxville, mailto:[email protected] Tennessee, USA
Copyright: © 2021. DeMichele and Kuenneke. This is an Open Reviewed by: Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Rex L. Cannon, PhD, SPESA Research Institute, Knoxville, Commons Attribution License (CC-BY). Tennessee, USA Genomary Krigbaum, PsyD, Grand Canyon University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Complex developmental trauma (CDT) is a condition mental health state of dissociation, or a defined by exposure to multiple traumatic disconnection of neuronal connections, limits the experiences most often of an interpersonal nature functional connectivity of the brain (Schore, 2014). during early development, between the ages of zero Functional connectivity refers to the integrated and seven, resulting in an underdeveloped nervous relationship between spatially separated brain system more inclined towards survival than healthy regions. attachment (van der Kolk, 2005). The effects of this can result in poor neuronal development, and an In normative brain development, the functional overall inefficiency in the systems in the body and connectivity of the three sections (brain stem, limbic brain (Bower, 2016; van der Kolk, 2005). This system, and cortex) work together. Chronic
2 | www.neuroregulation.org Vol. 8(1):2–13 2021 doi:10.15540/nr.8.1.2
DeMichele and Kuenneke NeuroRegulation exposure to trauma moves the brain stem and limbic Often misunderstood as being similar to stand-up system into a state of hyper- or hypoarousal. Threat comedy, improv, although comedic, is by contrast a is perceived everywhere, triggering a fear-based positive and supportive relational activity. Its survival response of flight/fight/freeze. The nervous foundational rule of Yes, and frames the relationship system goes either below or above its window of between players, the audience, as well as the tolerance and as a result of excessive stress, certain players to themselves. Halpern et al. (1994) brain regions within the cortex become disorganized describe improvisation as not merely an exchange of (Atzil, Hendler, & Feldman, 2011). This state information between players. Instead, players share negatively impacts emotional and behavioral responsibility and a a a ( . 38). regulation, motivation, cognitive function (De Bellis & A a a a Zisk, 2014) and sensorimotor integration (Stein, a a ( . 63). Spolin (1963) 2017). These deficits carry into adulthood, causing b a (p. 45), and Paul Sills, those who suffer from CDT to present with a founder of Second City Improv explains that improv comorbidity of emotional, behavioral, and cognitive a a diagnosis (Gunnar & Quevedo, 2007; Pechtel & a (Sweet, 1986, p. 20). The Pizzagalli, 2011). Essentially, maltreatment during requirement to unconditionally agree (Yes) and add early life changes the trajectory of brain to the offer of others (and), as well as oneself, development that affects sensory systems, network encourages the practice of trust, acceptance, architecture, and circuits involved in threat detection, concentrated focus with all senses, and spontaneity emotional regulation, and reward anticipation (Gale, 2004). While improv has remained a comedic (Teicher, Samson, Anderson, & Ohashi, 2016). performing art form, parallels in several domains of applied psychology (body awareness and While many established therapies like cognitive mindfulness, positive psychology interventions, and behavior therapy (CBT) require higher cortical person-centered psychotherapy) have bolstered systems to be activated, like verbal acuity, those interest in the use of improv as an experiential with CDT require an intervention that engages therapeutic intervention (Bermant, 2013). deeper centers of the brain before higher cortical systems can engage (Siegel, 2012). Successful There is a growing body of research examining the treatment involves positive, healthy, repetitive, use of improv as an intervention for a variety of relational experiences in the context of safe, clinical diagnosis or for self-identified mental health empathetic, and attuned relationships (Baylin & issues. Recent research exploring the effectiveness Hughes, 2016), which are all qualities developed a b through the practice of comedic/theatrical impact on those that suffer from anxiety and improvisation (improv; Ballon, Silver, & Fidler, 2007; depression in adults (Krueger, Murphy, & Bink, Bermant, 2013; DeMichele, 2015; Gale, 2004). 2017) and in teens (Felsman, Seifert, & Himle , 2019). Other studies report improvement in Short-form comedic improvisation (improv) is an prosocial behavior (Corbett et al., 2019; Kisiel et al., unscripted comedic art form that originated from the 2006; Zucker et al., 2010) and social cognition Theater Games of Viola Spolin (Spolin, 1963) and (Corbett et al., 2019). Studies involving teenagers began its development into its own art form in the a ab a late 1950s in Chicago (Wasson, 2017) and early tolerance (Felsman, Gunawardena, & Seifert, 2020; 1960s in England (J , 1992). Today, short- Hainselin, Aubry, & Bourdin, 2018) and affective form comedy improv is characterized by its short 30- well-being (Felsman et al., 2019; Schwenke, second to 3-minute-long game structures, driven by Dshemuchadse, Rasehorn, Klarhölter, & a a b Scherbaum, 2020). Research involving children saying Y , a . This foundational rule of Yes, note a reduction in aggressive behaviors and an and (Halpern, Close, & Johnson, 1994) prompts improvement in scholastic attention and players to unconditionally accept and add to the engagement (Kisiel et al., 2006; Zucker et al., 2010). b a a . While performed professionally, improv with this Brain imaging technology is revealing frame of Yes, and is comparable to the a ab a a ocortical improvisational, sociodramatic role-play of early and sensorimotor regions of the brain of musicians childhood development when children develop and rappers, who also use a Yes, and frame as they cognitive and social skills (Sawyer, 1997). repeatedly accept an offer without judgment and add to it. The activation of these brain regions may benefit those who suffer the neurobiological effects
3 | www.neuroregulation.org Vol. 8(1):2–13 2021 doi:10.15540/nr.8.1.2
DeMichele and Kuenneke NeuroRegulation of CDT (Schore, 2014). Findings, using fMRI mixed race, 6% American Indian and Asian). Races technology, indicate that engagement in an were indicated in the records of the participants as improvisational activity increases the activation of determined by their parents. All 28 participants were the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; self-expression) adopted, and all were right-handed. and of the sensorimotor and language regions of the brain (Limb & Braun, 2008; Liu et al., 2012; Participants had a co-occurring (average of five) of McPherson, Barrett, Lopez-Gonzalez, Jiradejvong, & clinical diagnosis as listed in the DSM-5 (APA, Limb, 2016). A 2019 study, using EEG brain 2013). The most common, listed in order of mapping technology (Sasaki, Iverson, & Callan, prevalence: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder 2019) revealed consistencies with the fMRI research (ADHD) (65%); major depressive disorder (50%); (Donnay, Rankin, Lopez-Gonzalez, Jiradejvong, & reactive attachment disorder, (25%) parent child Limb, 2014; Limb & Braun, 2008; Liu et al., 2012; relational problem (16%); anxiety disorder McPherson et al., 2016) with greater power for scale (31%)/Social anxiety disorder (6%); posttraumatic in the frontal area comprising regions of the medial stress disorder (PTSD; 31%); oppositional defiance frontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and the (22%); disruptive mood dysregulation disorder supplementary motor area (SMA). There are mixed (16%); specific learning disorder (16%); cannabis results among these studies regarding activation of use disorder (16%). the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPC). Some exhibiting its activation (Sasaki et al., 2019) and Assignment Method others its deactivation in relationship with the Participants were selected from a voluntarily activation of the MPFC, suggesting the mental state attended, on-site, 25- to 50-minute, weekly improv of flow (Limb & Braun, 2008). There is, however, class. Experience and ability playing improv varied consensus that the different results may be due to from 1 week to 16 months and was not a the skill level of the subjects, as well as the level of prerequisite for selection. Participants were constraint within the design of the study (Landau & selected based upon availability and simply asked if Limb, 2017; Sasaki et al., 2019). they would take part a a a N I (NI). One participant declined. Participants While the direction of research involving improv were informed they would have a qEEG, play improv continues to expand, there have been no published while still wearing the qEEG cap, and have a articles looking at the nervous system of groups of postscan done after the improv session. adolescents with CDT before and after an Participants understood that their brain scans would intervention of improv was used. With existing be evaluated before and after improv and that their research and the observation of positive emotional data was confidential. There was no further state changes during improv by adolescents with discussion or detail given about the hypothesis or CDT, we hypothesized that improv changes the purpose of the scans. An independent institutional functional connectivity of the brain, moving review board (IRB), IntegReview, approved this individuals from a neurobiological state of survival study. All participants provided verbal consent, a a a ab a while written consent was provided by parents or a b a legal guardians. a . Immediately prior to the preassessment, participants Methods were involved in unstructured social activities with peers and staff for a minimum of 15 to 45 minutes Participant Characteristics during the end of their routine day for baseline In this quasi-experimental pretest posttest design, recording. The study was conducted over an 8- the experimental group consisted of 32 subjects month period, with four participants being recorded between the ages of 15 and 18. Participants reside each session for a total of eight sessions. After their at a residential treatment center for adolescents, prescan, each participant walked with the neuro meeting the criteria for CDT. Thirty-two technician approximately 2 minutes to the improv preassessment and postassessment qEEGs were class where they began class with one to three other recorded; however, four participants were excluded participants. To avoid self-consciousness due to the because of distortion in the recordings, resulting in wearing of qEEG caps, the selection of the other the total number of N = 28. Participants included 14 one to three players in the session was based on female participants, 13 male participants, and 1 having a neutral or positive relationship with the transgender male (female-to-male) participant (59% other participants. White, 15% Latino, 10% African-American, 10%
4 | www.neuroregulation.org Vol. 8(1):2–13 2021 doi:10.15540/nr.8.1.2
DeMichele and Kuenneke NeuroRegulation
EEG Data Collection form improv games and using the One Rule Improv Quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) was (ORI) approach (DeMichele, 2019) to learning and used to record the nervous system of 32 playing improv developed and facilitated by a co- adolescents with developmental trauma before and author of this study (DeMichele). The ORI approach after the improv intervention (ORI) to evaluate to learning improv explicitly focuses on the rule of changes in the brainwave frequencies. Scalp Yes, and when teaching, playing, and facilitating voltages were recorded using a 19 Sn electrode cap improv games. While many games, including (Electro-Cap International, Eaton, OH) according to theater games and some commonly performed the 10 20 international system: Fp1, Fp2, F7, F3, improv games, are improvisational as they are Fz, F4, F8, T3, C3, Cz, C4, T4, T5, P3, Pz, P4, T6, unscripted, experiential, and learner centered, they O1, O2. The ground electrode was placed on the are not necessarily collaborative or lack the frame of scalp between Fpz and Fz. Electrical signals were Yes, and (DeMichele, 2015), as are the games used amplified with the BrainM Discovery 24 and in this study. Initially developed to help adolescents 20 EEG systems (BrainMaster Technologies, improve learning experiences and outcomes Bedford, OH) and all electrode impedances were (DeMichele, 2015), this current intervention NI uses kept under 5 . Electrodes were referenced to ORI to help students with CDT to attain a better linked earlobes. The EEG was recorded mental state as well as the essential skills to enable continuously, digitized at a sampling rate of 256 Hz, them to better communicate and form healthy and then spectral analyzed using the fast Fourier relationships. transform (FFT). EEG data was filtered with a 0.5 40 Hz bandpass filter. Participants recorded 5 6 During each 20-min NI session, participants minutes eyes-open recordings for the practiced games for the entire duration of time preassessment, and 5 6 minutes eyes open for the without any debrief or discussion. Feedback and postassessment. side-coaching were limited to Yes, and reminders. Each session began with a 7- to 10-minute full group EEG Data Processing warm-up which opened with the theater game 1–20, U NeuroG 3.0.2, qEEG data was analyzed in which participants stand in a circle, looking at (Applied Neuroscience, 2008). Thirty-second each other and counting consecutively from 1 to 20, minimum samples were collected. Elimination of randomly offering one number at a time. If two artifacts were done visually by a trained players say the same number at the same time, all professional. Coherence, Phase, and LORETA must start again at one. Although considered a computations from NeuroS N oB 3.0.2 theater game and not an improv game by the author were used to analyze coherence, phase, and low- because it is not based upon an audience resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). suggestion or framed by Yes, and, Coherence, which is a measurement of functional offer is prescribed to be consecutive numbers association between two brain regions (Nunez, between 1 and 20, players must still listen and add, 1981, 1995), was calculated by looking at the creating an attunement to each other. variability of time differences between two time series in a specific frequency band including delta Next, a series of Yes, and-style games in which (1 4 Hz), theta (4 8 Hz), alpha (8 12 Hz), and beta Y , (12 25 Hz). Phase lag is calculated by evaluating played. One Word at a Time games followed, in two waves at a specific frequency at the same point which players create sentences speaking only one in time. The difference between the waves is word at time. Participants then played games in measured in radians, and if a difference exists the accordance with an appropriate challenge level for waves are considered out of phase. If the difference interest and enjoyment as chosen by the facilitator is radians, then the waves are in antiphase. and the student. Games included the Yes, and- LORETA was used to provide insight into the style and One Word at a Time games listed above, dynamic functioning of the brain. LORETA utilizes a as well as the following: Expert-style games 19-channel EEG cap and three-dimensional (3-D) including Interview games whereby player(s) source imaging to determine the specific source of interview another player; Story games in which an electric dipole (Pascual-Marqui, Michel, & players create well-formed narratives either Lehmann, 1994). simultaneously as in Mirror Story, or by alternatively offering one word at a time or phrases and In e en i n sentences at a time; Scene-based games in which All participants experienced a 20-min improv players create scene like in Alphabet, where they intervention, Neuro Improv (NI), consisting of short- must begin each line of dialogue with the next letter
5 | www.neuroregulation.org Vol. 8(1):2–13 2021 doi:10.15540/nr.8.1.2
DeMichele and Kuenneke NeuroRegulation of the alphabet, or like in Freeze Tag, where players Table 1 start a scene, are frozen in a position, and a new Difference in Coherence for EEG frequency player must tag in and start a whole new scene. variables (delta, theta, alpha, and beta) before and after improv Results Placement Frequency p-value
To assess the hypothesis and qualify if improv would F7, T3 Delta .030 change the functional connectivity of the brain, the Fp2, F8 Delta .002 metrics of coherence, phase lag, absolute Fp3, T4 Delta .032 amplitude, and LORETA were evaluated. Coherence is the measurement of the stability of F4, C4 Delta .046 phase, or the efficiency in communication between F4, F8 Delta .012 paired sites. Too much coherence at paired sites C4, F8 Delta .007 may contribute to rigidity, whereas if there is not F8, T4 Delta .016 enough coherence it may contribute to difficulty with task completion and neurological integration. Phase F3, F4 Delta .007 lag is a measurement of the speed and timing of P3, O1 Theta .009 communication between paired sites. If phase lag is O1, T5 Theta .023 too fast or too slow it impacts the usefulness of the Fp2, T4 Theta .041 information being communicated. Absolute amplitude is a measurement of the power of the F4, F8 Theta .017 frequencies, or V squared. LORETA is a F4, T4 Theta .028 measurement that looks at the deeper centers of the P4, O2 Theta .027 brain related to the surface EEG. A paired t-test O2, T6 Theta .017 was applied to each one to look at the difference between preassessment and postassessment. The F8, T4 Theta .002 results of the averages of all participants showed F8, T6 Theta .031 noticeable changes in all the metrics. T4, T6 Theta .034 T5, T6 Theta .034 Coherence Outcomes Using the 10 20 international system, all 361 paired Fp1, F7 Alpha .016 sites were evaluated. The coherence results Fp2, F4 Alpha .006 showed a statistically significant increase in F4, F8 Alpha .007 coherence both interhemispherically and C4, F8 Alpha .003 intrahemispherically in many different paired sites and across all frequencies with more increases in P4, F8 Alpha .001 coherence in the right hemisphere than the left, F8, T4 Alpha .003 except in beta where there is almost an equal Fp1, P3 Beta .033 amount of change difference (see Table 1). Fp1, o1 Beta .030
As shown in Figure 1, the colors of the lines Fp1, T3 Beta .022 represent the statistical p-value: the blue color Fp1, T5 Beta .008 represents statistically significant p-value in the Fp2, C4 Beta .023 direction of more coherence from preassessment to Fp2, P4 Beta .043 postassessment. F4, F8 Beta .017 C4, f8 Beta .003 P4, F8 Beta .040 O2, F8 Beta .036 O2, T6 Beta .006
6 | www.neuroregulation.org Vol. 8(1):2–13 2021 doi:10.15540/nr.8.1.2
DeMichele and Kuenneke NeuroRegulation
p <= .050 p <= .025 p <= .010
Figure 1. 10 20 results from preassessment to postassessment (N = 28). Any line indicates significant changes (p < .05) in the coherence between paired sites. Red indicates decreases, while blue indicates increases. Colored lines indicate significant changes, while the thickness of the line denotes the associated probability value (p <= .050, p <= .025, p <= .010).
Phase Lag Table 2 Using the 10 20 international system all 361 paired Difference in Phase Lag for EEG frequency sites were evaluated. The phase lag analysis found variables (delta, theta, alpha, and beta) significant change in phase lag from preassessment to postassessment, with more changes in the right Placement Frequency p-value hemisphere than the left. This shift indicated that C3, P3 Delta 0.034 after an improv session phase lag slowed down. F7, T3 Delta 0.037
As shown in Figure 2, the colors of the lines C4, O2 Delta 0.050 represent the statistical p-value: the red and blue P4, O2 Delta 0.005 colors represent statistically significant p-values, C3, C4 Alpha 0.028 where red shows a decrease in phase lag from preassessment to postassessment and blue F4, F8 Alpha 0.032 indicates an increase in phase lag from C4, O2 Beta 0.006 preassessment to postassessment. P4, O2 Beta 0.001
p <= .050 p <= .025 p <= .010
Figure 2. From preassessment to postassessment (N = 28). Colored lines indicate significant changes (p < .05) in the phase lag between paired sites. Red indicates decreases, while blue indicates increases. Colored lines indicate significant changes, while the thickness of the line denotes the associated probability value (p <= .050, p <= .025, p <= .010).
7 | www.neuroregulation.org Vol. 8(1):2–13 2021 doi:10.15540/nr.8.1.2
DeMichele and Kuenneke NeuroRegulation
Absolute Power Evaluation Table 3 To investigate the difference between qEEG Amplitude Absolute Power maps for EEG frequency absolute power preassessments and variables (delta, theta, alpha, beta, beta 1, beta 2, postassessments, a paired t-test was used. It beta 3 and high beta) revealed a significant increase in alpha frontal at Fp1 (p = .0043), and a decrease in Delta at T4 (p = Placement Frequency p-value .030). FP1-LE Alpha .043
T3 showed a decrease in high beta; however, in the T3-LE High Beta .042 raw data, despite using many different methods of T4-LE Delta .030 muscle relaxation, some participants exhibited an Note. Blue and red coloration of p-value indicate unconscious or chronic tension at the T3 location. It significance increases or decreases, where blue indicates was difficult to remove all muscle artifact from the an increase while red indicates a decrease in power. EEG at T3. It was interesting that the postassessments revealed that improv affected the participants ability to release chronic muscle LORETA Power tension. LORETA analysis indicated significant changes in Alpha level (p <= .05). Delta decreased in As shown in Table 3, the colors indicate statistical p- Brodmann areas (BA) 6, 10, and 24, which are values and direction of change: red indicates a medial frontal gyrus (MFG); superior frontal gyrus decrease in amplitude, while blue indicates an (SFG), t(27) = 4.96; and anterior cingulate cortex increase in amplitude. (ACC), t(27) = 3.90. Delta decreased from preassessment to postassessment in BA 4, BA 3, and BA 40, which are the precentral gyrus (PCG) and inferior temporal gyrus (ITG), t(27) = 4.35; df = 27; p < .05. Sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) decreased in BA 6 which is the SFG, t(27) = 6.1.
Figure 3 LORETA brain images: Red coloration indicated a significant decrease in activation A
8 | www.neuroregulation.org Vol. 8(1):2–13 2021 doi:10.15540/nr.8.1.2
DeMichele and Kuenneke NeuroRegulation
B
C
D
Figure 3. (A) EEG frequency 2 Hz. BA 6, BA 10 medial frontal gyrus, superior frontal gyrus: t(27) = 4.96; df = 27; p < .05. (B) EEG frequency 13 Hz. Red coloration indicated a significant decrease in activation. BA 6 superior frontal gyrus: t(27) = 6.1; df = 27; p < .05. (C) EEG frequency 4 Hz. Red coloration indicated a significant decrease in activation. BA 4, BA 3, BA 40 precentral gyrus, inferior parietal lobule: t(27) = 4.35; df = 27; p < .05. (D) EEG Frequency 1 Hz. BA 24 anterior cingulate: t(27) = 3.90; df = 27; p < .05.
9 | www.neuroregulation.org Vol. 8(1):2–13 2021 doi:10.15540/nr.8.1.2
DeMichele and Kuenneke NeuroRegulation
Discussion each interpersonal interaction in a reciprocity of unconditional positive regard (Bermant, 2013). This This is the first qEEG study to evaluate CDT and positive energy and information can influence improv, and how it affects functional connectivity in ac acc a c a ac c a . In the brain. Results indicate that improv affects the every interaction, trust is built in oneself and with functional connectivity of the brain, activating higher others. Additionally, Yes, and limits uncertainty in cortical systems and moving individuals from a social interaction, thus limiting personal fear. With neurobiological state of survival to a state in which the conditions set for emotional safety, a shift from they are able to integrate complex problem-solving the survival brain to the activation of communication skills, to better engage in connection with between other regions is possible (Baylin & Hughes, themselves and others. Differing from the 2016). In other words, improv increases coherence observation of ongoing events as seen in the and connectivity, shifting the nervous system from a existing studies involving musicians (Limb & Braun, c a 2008; Liu et al., 2012; McPherson et al., 2016; tolerance, effectively increasing the span of the Sasaki et al., 2019) and those with autism (Corbett window of tolerance, and bringing arousal levels et al., 2019), a qEEG recorded before and after an within it. improv intervention revealed results related to sustained effects of improvisation. P a e La D c Results indicated that phase decreased from After one 20-min session of practicing short-form preassessment to postassessment, indicating that improv games framed by Yes, and, and participants the timing of neuronal connections decreased. having varying degrees of experience, results Phase lag is related to the timing of communication showed a change in the nervous system. While use between areas of the brain. When timing is of play to encourage epigenetic changes in the brain a a a a (Panksepp & Panksepp, 2013) may help to correct quickly, information becomes difficult to interpret or some of the effects of early life adversity when used understand. This inefficient processing may result in in attachment-focused therapies (Baylin & Hughes, a , a b c a 2016), a a Yes, and may understanding. This may be the reason that there is be the catalyst for the observed neurobiological so much mental perseveration with participants with changes. CDT. A decrease means that the b a timing has slowed down, increasing the effectiveness of the C e e ce D c nervous system to coordinate movement, meaning, The results showed an increase in coherence from and decisions (Warner, 2013). preassessment to postassessment with more changes in the right hemisphere than the left. Yes, and may foster the condition for the decrease in C c ab a a phase lag because it encourages focused attention. between two paired sites. T c c c may Focused attention is created by the spontaneity or cause the brain to become too simple novelty (Kagan, 2002) instigated by Yes, and in a a , variation of function. every interaction. With attention focused on Lack of coherence results in too much differentiation receiving and understanding an offer, along with the leading to disconnection and dissociation. While increase in coherence, information becomes more CDT impacts the right hemisphere most profoundly, c , c , a c promoting dissociative states, which are indicative of personal/self-c c a c a a . neuronal disconnection (Schore, 2012), increases in coherence may influence the building LORETA: Sensorimotor System a c c (Wa , 2013), Consistent with the improvisational studies involving to restore normative brain function. musical and lyrical improvisation, significant activation of the sensorimotor system was observed Since improv is setting a frame for a positive (BA 40, BA 4, BA 6; Limb & Braun, 2008; Liu et al., experience with the opportunity for connection, the 2012; McPherson et al., 2016; Sasaki et al., 2019). increase in right hemisphere activation may be a When underdeveloped, a sensorimotor system will shift out of disassociation and towards interpersonal negatively impact the emotional and cognitive connection. I c Yes, and may systems; however, neuroplastic development can be increase coherence by creating the conditions for experienced through play (Berghänel, Schülke, & a a b a a Ostner, 2015) and improv is a form of play. more integrated nervo . Yes, and frames
10 | www.neuroregulation.org Vol. 8(1):2–13 2021 doi:10.15540/nr.8.1.2
DeMichele and Kuenneke NeuroRegulation
The activation of BA 6 indicates the potential for awareness, and approach behavior (Soutar & improved cognition and improved executive control Longo, 2011) and is important for impulse control, (Stein, 2017) and is related to motor planning and attention, and self-regulation. The activation of BA premotor movement. This same region showed a 10 ab c a decrease in SMR, suggesting the priming of motor development of the brain and the orbital frontal cortex, essentially moving the brain to a state where cortex, which Schore (2012) deems essential for movement was readily accessible. The activation of healthy attachment and affect regulation. BA 40, 3, and 4 (PCG, ITG) involve the perception of space and limb location and may influence the ability LORETA: A e i Ci g a e to create meaning around posture and gestures, as Data showed an activation of the anterior cingulate. well as access to the mirror neuron system (Carlson, This region is implicated in motor control and 2012, p. 273 275; Reed & Caselli, 1994) and emotional regulation (Etkin, Egner, & Kalisch, 2011; somatosensory processing (Stein, 2017). The Landau & Limb, 2017; Pascual-Marqui, Esslen, results also indicated that improv affected the right Kochi, & Lehmann, 2002; Paus, 2001). Landau and temporal lobe, which is related to the function of Limb (2017) described that a b auditory processing, personality, categorization, and implicated in the selection and sequencing of organization (Soutar & Longo, 2011). Complex ca a d a ( . 29). development trauma is typically characterized by a dissociation and impairment with affect regulation While it was not determined if the DLPC quieted (Schore, 2014). The activation of these creating the neural signature of flow state (López- observational mechanisms within the sensorimotor González, & Limb, 2012), the activation of MPFC system seems to be necessary conditions for (BA 10) was present. With the safety, risk, focused attunement to oneself and others, which is essential attention, full embodiment, and reciprocating co- for the formation of healthy relationships. creation created by Yes, and (Landau & Limb, 2017), improv may set the condition to exist in the Yes, and may set the condition for this activation as span of arousal as described by Siegel (2012), it provides the opportunity to practice consistent and which in turn triggers group flow (Sawyer, 2017) and reciprocal attunement, prompting the mirror neuron integration. Interacting in a way where groups can . It is plausible that with Yes, and the exist within the span of arousal with a valence participants brains attuned to internal and external towards positive energy and information may be the sensory information to be better able to respond. pinnacle of desired human interaction and This shift in the sensorimotor region allows for an connection. easier experience understanding and making meaning out of verbal and nonverbal Strengths/Limitations communication. I c on the sensorimotor Neurobiological changes to the brain due to early system suggests that by participating in improv, the childhood adversity are specific, depending upon the development of sensorimotor systems would type and timing of exposure (Atzil et al., 2011; become more refined over time. Teicher et al., 2016); therefore, those who suffer the substantial medical and psychiatric disadvantages of LORETA: Medial Frontal Gyrus developmental trauma present with a comorbidity of Data showed the activation of the medial frontal diagnosis (Anda et al., 2006). The trauma gyrus (BA 10) which plays a critical role in human c d b d a c a a d attachment neurobiology. Deficits in this region due type, timing, and origin in various domestic and to early adversity (Teicher et al., 2016) heighten the international locations. While an adequate sample risk for psychiatric disorders (Schore, 2012). The size of the represented individual diagnosis was not activation of BA 10 is consistent with the findings of available to determine significant change specific to the fMRI and EEG studies of musical improvisation. that diagnosis, the neurobiological changes This brain region is associated with higher-cognitive recorded do suggest that improv may serve as a abilities that facilitate extraction of meaning from broad-based intervention to a variety of diagnosis ongoing experiences, the organization of mental that continue to impact health, education, contents that control creative thinking and language, correctional, societal systems, and individuals. and the artistic expression and planning of future actions (Damasio, 1985; Semendeferi, Armstrong, The main limitation to this quasi-experimental, Schleicher, Zilles, & Van Hoesen, 2001). Activation single-group pretest posttest study is the lack of a at the Fp1 location is related to the function of control. However, it can be said that based on cognitive emotional valence, irritability, social EEG ab a d a d , a participant was
11 | www.neuroregulation.org Vol. 8(1):2–13 2021 doi:10.15540/nr.8.1.2
DeMichele and Kuenneke NeuroRegulation