DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Seward Peninsula Federal Subsistence 2 Regional

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Seward Peninsula Federal Subsistence 2 Regional 1 SEWARD PENINSULA FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE 2 REGIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING 3 4 PUBLIC MEETING 5 6 7 VOLUME II 8 9 Aurora Inn 10 Nome, Alaska 11 October 4, 2012 12 9:00 a.m. 13 14 Members Present: 15 16 Louis Green, Chairman 17 Reggie Barr 18 Peter Buck 19 Fred Eningowuk 20 Tom Gray 21 Elmer Seetot 22 Timothy Smith 23 24 25 Regional Council Coordinator - Alex Nick 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 Recorded and transcribed by: 43 44 Computer Matrix Court Reporters, LLC 45 135 Christensen Drive, Suite 2 46 Anchorage, AK 99501 47 907-243-0668/907-227-5312 48 [email protected] 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 3 (Nome, Alaska - 10/4/2012) 4 5 (On record) 6 7 CHAIRMAN GREEN: We're going to call 8 this meeting to order, the 4th of October, and we're 9 getting some charts and stuff handed around here the 10 table about muskox concerns here. Mr. Gorn is going to 11 come to the table and we're going to give him the 12 floor. 13 14 MR. NICK: Mr. Chair. 15 16 CHAIRMAN GREEN: Alex, go ahead. 17 18 MR. NICK: I would like to make a 19 couple of reminders to the Council. I handed out your 20 electronic ticket receipt, which is an old one for 21 those of you who made changes to your travel. There's 22 a couple of them who made changes -- who requested to 23 change their travel back to the village. If you need 24 to make travel changes, according to the policy, we are 25 not to make our own changes, you need to contact me or 26 OSM. What I did was I jotted down OSM toll free number 27 and my contact numbers. Make sure when you travel -- 28 for weather factors, you know, we can't do anything 29 about that so if you need to make changes due to 30 weather you need to contact our office in Anchorage or 31 me so that we could change your itinerary on your 32 return trip. 33 34 What I also need, as soon as you get 35 back to your villages, your taxi receipts, make sure 36 you get your taxi receipts and either fax or email them 37 to me, if you have a scanner. It would be good, you 38 know, if you sent those to me within a couple days, 39 like following Monday when you return to your village. 40 41 I talked to hotel manager yesterday 42 that, if necessary, you will be authorized to stay 43 after the meeting, check into the airline and if you 44 can't make it out you will be authorized to stay at the 45 hotel for additional day or two, depending on what the 46 weather is doing. 47 48 But if you make changes, like there's a 49 couple of you that made changes to return later, a day 50 later or a couple days later, your per diem will end on 147 1 the day and time when you're supposed to arrive at 2 home. That will change, you know, if there's a weather 3 factor, but if you make changes and say that you're 4 going to be on your own for maybe a day or two and we 5 tell our travel staff in Anchorage then your per diem 6 will end on the day and time you're supposed to reach 7 home. 8 9 Any questions. 10 11 (No comments) 12 13 MR. NICK: Quyana. 14 15 CHAIRMAN GREEN: Thank you, Alex. 16 Well, Mr. Gorn, you have the floor. 17 18 MR. ADKISSON: Mr. Chair. 19 20 CHAIRMAN GREEN: Oh, I'm sorry. 21 22 MR. ADKISSON: Ken Adkisson, National 23 Park Service. I mean since this is basically a Federal 24 program, it might be useful to kind of structure this 25 discussion or presentation, if I could make a couple 26 brief introductory remarks to kind of set the stage and 27 then turn it over to Tony to go into all of the biology 28 and the underlying things, and then he can also cover 29 how that affected the State hunt and, then, finally, I 30 can come back and briefly discuss how we're approaching 31 the Federal hunt in relation to all of that, if that 32 works for you. 33 34 CHAIRMAN GREEN: It works good. 35 36 MR. ADKISSON: Excellent. 37 38 Mr. Chair. Council members. Let me 39 just start out by referring you to the handout that you 40 were provided called the 2012/2013 subsistence muskox 41 hunts on the Seward Peninsula. That's the reality 42 right now, that's where we're at in the current hunt 43 year. So that's a fact. And that's a starting point. 44 45 The points I would make about that is, 46 I've also handed out a map that refers to the 2008 47 situation that led to the Tier I -- creating the large 48 numbers of areas under Tier I, and that will show you 49 the harvest quotas for each of those hunt areas, as 50 well as the up to drawing quotas that we had under the 148 1 Tier I system. So what I'd like to say about that is 2 if you look at 2008, that's really the high water mark, 3 so to speak, of population and opportunity. And when 4 you look at the 2012 and 2013 hunt year, you can see 5 there are very substantial changes. One, there's no 6 more cow hunt. There is no open cow season any longer. 7 Two, the allowable harvest quotas have been reduced 8 substantially in most areas. There, in most cases, are 9 no more Tier I hunts except 22E, all the rest of the 10 hunt areas have reverted to Tier II under State 11 management. So substantial changes. 12 13 Now, I think unless there are questions 14 right now, I think now would be a good time to turn it 15 over to Tony and let him start leading into the biology 16 that, you know, how we got to where we are today. 17 18 MR. GRAY: Mr. Chairman. 19 20 CHAIRMAN GREEN: Go ahead. 21 22 MR. GRAY: Could I ask him to give a 23 quick summary of why the substantial changes from the 24 Park Service point of view, before the biology. 25 26 CHAIRMAN GREEN: Ken. 27 28 MR. ADKISSON: I could do that, yes, 29 Mr. Chair. 30 31 MR. GRAY: Thank you. 32 33 MR. ADKISSON: I also handed out a 34 flier that we like distributed as a sample that we 35 distributed in 22E related to the Federal hunt. If you 36 look down there you can see, for example, very briefly, 37 the reduction in allowable harvest due to the decline 38 of almost 50 percent of the muskoxen population in GMU 39 22E between 2010 and 2012, as well as declines in the 40 bull/cow ratio and in recruitment. And while the 41 individual hunt areas may differ, and Tony will get 42 into this perhaps, basically overall on the Seward 43 Penn, between 2010 2012 there's been a significant 44 reduction in population and many of the hunt areas are 45 experiencing these declines in recruitment and bull/cow 46 ratios. 47 48 So that's it in a nutshell and Tony can 49 provide you all the details. 50 149 1 MR. GRAY: Thank you. 2 3 MR. ADKISSON: I think. 4 5 CHAIRMAN GREEN: Okay, thank you, Ken. 6 7 Tony, you're up. 8 9 MR. GORN: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I 10 don't know, maybe if I had fancy slides on the wall, 11 the name of the talk that we're going to have right now 12 would be lessons learned, because I think over the last 13 several years we're learning more about muskox 14 populations than any other species that we manage in 15 Unit 22. 16 17 One of the things that we've learned, 18 and I need to take a moment to correct my colleague to 19 the left of me, we cannot be talking about a subunit 20 based muskox population, they don't work that way. The 21 Unit 22E muskox population did not decrease 50 percent, 22 you know, we know these animals move incredible 23 distances across the Seward Peninsula. Now, at the end 24 of the day we got to manage hunts somehow, and what 25 we're most familiar with is using subunits as hunt 26 areas because we need geographic parameters to 27 administer these hunts so we do, often times, talk 28 about the number of animals present in a certain area 29 but I just want to make sure that everybody understands 30 we don't have separate populations of muskox on the 31 Seward Peninsula. 32 33 With that said I'll just quickly let 34 you know what we do at Fish and Game in our muskox S&I 35 program. First of all, we work cooperatively with all 36 the Federal agencies. It's really a great working 37 relationship between the Department of Fish and Game, 38 the Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, US Fish 39 and Wildlife Service, and I hope I didn't forget 40 anybody, and every two years we estimate the 41 population.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forage Fishes of the Southeastern Bering Sea Conference Proceedings
    a OCS Study MMS 87-0017 Forage Fishes of the Southeastern Bering Sea Conference Proceedings 1-1 July 1987 Minerals Management Service Alaska OCS Region OCS Study MMS 87-0017 FORAGE FISHES OF THE SOUTHEASTERN BERING SEA Proceedings of a Conference 4-5 November 1986 Anchorage Hilton Hotel Anchorage, Alaska Prepared f br: U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service Alaska OCS Region 949 East 36th Avenue, Room 110 Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4302 Under Contract No. 14-12-0001-30297 Logistical Support and Report Preparation By: MBC Applied Environmental Sciences 947 Newhall Street Costa Mesa, California 92627 July 1987 CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................. iv INTRODUCTION PAPERS Dynamics of the Southeastern Bering Sea Oceanographic Environment - H. Joseph Niebauer .................................. The Bering Sea Ecosystem as a Predation Controlled System - Taivo Laevastu .... Marine Mammals and Forage Fishes in the Southeastern Bering Sea - Kathryn J. Frost and Lloyd Lowry. ............................. Trophic Interactions Between Forage Fish and Seabirds in the Southeastern Bering Sea - Gerald A. Sanger ............................ Demersal Fish Predators of Pelagic Forage Fishes in the Southeastern Bering Sea - M. James Allen ................................ Dynamics of Coastal Salmon in the Southeastern Bering Sea - Donald E. Rogers . Forage Fish Use of Inshore Habitats North of the Alaska Peninsula - Jonathan P. Houghton ................................. Forage Fishes in the Shallow Waters of the North- leut ti an Shelf - Peter Craig ... Population Dynamics of Pacific Herring (Clupea pallasii), Capelin (Mallotus villosus), and Other Coastal Pelagic Fishes in the Eastern Bering Sea - Vidar G. Wespestad The History of Pacific Herring (Clupea pallasii) Fisheries in Alaska - Fritz Funk . Environmental-Dependent Stock-Recruitment Models for Pacific Herring (Clupea pallasii) - Max Stocker.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Management Plan for Arctic Grayling Sport Fisheries Along the Nome Road System, 2001–2004
    Fishery Management Report No. 02-03 Fishery Management Plan for Arctic Grayling Sport Fisheries along the Nome Road System, 2001–2004 by Fred DeCicco April 2002 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used in Division of Sport Fish Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, and Special Publications without definition. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics, fisheries centimeter cm All commonly accepted e.g., Mr., Mrs., alternate hypothesis HA deciliter dL abbreviations. a.m., p.m., etc. base of natural e gram g All commonly accepted e.g., Dr., Ph.D., logarithm hectare ha professional titles. R.N., etc. catch per unit effort CPUE kilogram kg and & coefficient of variation CV at @ 2 kilometer km common test statistics F, t, , etc. liter L Compass directions: confidence interval C.I. meter m east E correlation coefficient R (multiple) north N metric ton mt correlation coefficient r (simple) milliliter ml south S covariance cov millimeter mm west W degree (angular or ° Copyright temperature) Weights and measures (English) Corporate suffixes: degrees of freedom df cubic feet per second ft3/s Company Co. divided by ÷ or / (in foot ft Corporation Corp. equations) gallon gal Incorporated Inc. equals = inch in Limited Ltd. expected value E mile mi et alii (and other et al. fork length FL ounce oz people) greater than > O pound lb et cetera (and so forth) etc. greater than or equal to quart qt exempli gratia (for e.g., harvest per unit effort HPUE example) yard yd less than < id est (that is) i.e., ? less than or equal to latitude or longitude lat.
    [Show full text]
  • Pamphlet to Accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3131
    Bedrock Geologic Map of the Seward Peninsula, Alaska, and Accompanying Conodont Data By Alison B. Till, Julie A. Dumoulin, Melanie B. Werdon, and Heather A. Bleick Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3131 View of Salmon Lake and the eastern Kigluaik Mountains, central Seward Peninsula 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Sources of data ....................................................................................................................................1 Components of the map and accompanying materials .................................................................1 Geologic Summary ........................................................................................................................................1 Major geologic components ..............................................................................................................1 York terrane ..................................................................................................................................2 Grantley Harbor Fault Zone and contact between the York terrane and the Nome Complex ..........................................................................................................................3 Nome Complex ............................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Data for the Preliminary Bedrock Geologic Map of The
    Open-File Report 2009-1254 U.S. Department of the Interior Sheet 2 of 2 U.S. Geological Survey Pamphlet accompanies map '02°761 '01°761 '00°761 LIST OF METAMORPHIC-TECTONIC ELEMENTS HIGH GRADE METAMORPHIC AND ASSOCIATED O<t Qs Ol Nome Complex, west-central – Weakly foliated metasedimentary O<l O<l IGNEOUS ROCKS – Amphibolite and granulite-facies O<l O<l Ol Ols Ols YORK TERRANE – Late Proterozoic (?) and Paleozoic sedimentary and unfoliated metaigneous rocks that retain relict primary features; and metasedimentary rocks and minor Late Cretaceous tin-bearing mineral assemblages in mafic rocks formed at pumpellyite-actinolite, metamorphic rocks and associated Cretaceous plutons; penetratively Qs greenschist, and blueschist facies (one locality) deformed metasedimentary and metaigneous schist and gneiss with Oal granites; dominantly carbonate and siliciclastic lithologies, in which Oal primary features are generally retained; fine-grained Nome Complex, eastern – Penetratively deformed and complex metamorphic histories; aluminum-rich lithologies show Ol early development of kyanite-stable mineral assemblages succeeded Ol 17 metasedimentary rocks are weakly foliated. Metamorphic and recrystallized schists with ductile fabrics; protolith packages and Ol Ols 165°00' by sillimanite-stable, lower-pressure assemblages. Lithologies rich in O<p Ols thermal history variable from unit to unit, and generally lower grade metamorphic fabrics identical to Nome Complex in central Seward Oal Qs Peninsula; mineral assemblages in most of the area are characteristic iron and aluminum retain early, relatively high pressure Ktg than Nome Complex. Tin granites intruded in shallow crustal Ols Ol aluminosilicate plus orthoamphibole assemblages (>5kb) that are Cape Espenberg settings. The generally brittle shallow and steeply-dipping structures of greenschist facies, but slightly higher grade assemblages occur in Ol the vicinity of Kiwalik Mountain.
    [Show full text]
  • The PAYSTREAK Volume 12, No
    The PAYSTREAK Volume 12, No. 2, Fall 2010 The Newsletter of the Alaska Mining Hall of Fame Foundation (AMHF) In this issue: AMHF New Inductees Page 1 Induction Ceremony Program Page 2 Introduction and Acknowledgements Page 3 Previous AMHF Inductees Pages 4 - 10 New Inductee Biographies Pages 10 - 23 Distinguished Alaskans Aid Foundation Page 24 Alaska Mining Hall of Fame Directors and Officers Page 24 Alaska Mining Hall of Fame Foundation New Inductees AMHF Honors Pioneers Important to the Seward Peninsula Gold Dredging Industry Nicholas B. and Evinda S. Tweet: It is difficult to name any couple in Alaska mining history that has had more longevity and perseverance than Nicholas B. and Evinda S. Tweet. In marriage, they formed a team that created a remarkably stable, family-owned firm, N.B. Tweet and Sons, which has mined gold in Alaska for 110 years. Nicholas and Evinda mined and lived in several placer mining camps, worked graphite claims, operated gold dredges, and inspired their descendants to continue the placer mining lifestyle. Both Evinda and Nick died at the family mining camp, near Taylor, north of Nome. In 2010, N.B. Tweet and Sons operated the only bucketline stacker gold dredge in North America. Carl S. (left) and Walter A. (right) Glavinovich: Two Croatian (Yugoslavian)-born brothers who, collectively, devoted more than one-hundred years of their lives to the prospecting, deciphering, drilling, thawing, and dredging of the Nome, Alaska, placer gold fields. Most of these years were in the service of one company, the U.S. Smelting, Refining, and Mining Company (USSR&M) or its direct affiliate, the Hammon Consolidated Gold Fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate-Ocean Effects on AYK Chinook Salmon
    SAFS-UW-1003 2010 Arctic Yukon Kuskokwim (AYK) Sustainable Salmon Initiative Project Final Product1 Climate-Ocean Effects on AYK Chinook Salmon Chukchi Sea by Katherine W. Myers2, Robert V. Walker2, Nancy D. Davis2, Janet L. Armstrong2, Wyatt J. Fournier2, Nathan J. Mantua2, and Julie Raymond-Yakoubian 3 2High Seas Salmon Research Program, School of Aquatic & Fishery Sciences (SAFS), University of Washington (UW), Box 355020, Seattle, WA 98195-5020, USA 3Kawerak, Inc., PO Box 948, Nome, AK 99762, USA November 2010 1Final products of AYK Sustainable Salmon Initiative (SSI) research are made available to the Initiatives partners and the public in the interest of rapid dissemination of information that may be useful in salmon management, research, or administration. Sponsorship of the project by the AYK SSI does not necessarily imply that the findings or conclusions are endorsed by the AYK SSI. ABSTRACT A high-priority research issue identified by the Arctic-Yukon-Kuskokwim (AYK) Sustainable Salmon Initiative (SSI) is to determine whether the ocean environment is a more important cause of variation in the abundance of AYK Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) populations than marine fishing mortality. At the outset of this project, however, data on ocean life history of AYK salmon were too limited to test hypotheses about the effects of environmental conditions versus fishing on marine survival. Our goal was to identify and evaluate life history patterns of use of marine resources (habitat and food) by Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha) and to explore how these patterns are affected by climate-ocean conditions, including documentation of local traditional knowledge (LTK) of this high-priority issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Migration and Status of Pacific Herring
    AYK Herring Report No.lZ ~ DISTRIBUTION !ND MIGRATION AND STATUS OF PACIFIC HERRING by Vidar G. Wespestad* and Louis H. Barton** *Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oce~ic and Atmospheric Administration 2725 Montlake Boulevard East Seattle, Washington 98112 **Alaska Dept. Fish and Game 333 Raspberry Road Anchorage, Alaska 99502 December 1979 .. .. .. .. .. DISTRIBUTION AND MIGRATION AND STATUS OF PACIFIC HERRING Vidar G. Wespestad Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Center 2725 Montlake Blvd. E. Seattle, Washington 98112 Louis H. Barton Alaska Dept. Fish and Game 333 Raspberry Road Anchorage, Alaska 99502 ABSTRACT Pacific herring are an important part of the Bering Sea food­ web and fi;>rm the basis of a major connnercial fishery. Until re­ cently Japan and the U.S.S.R. have been major exploiters of herring. Catch peaked in the early 1970 1 s at 145,579 mt, and then declined in response to overfishing and poor recruitment. Recently herring abundance has increased, and the United States has become the dom­ inant exploiter of herring. Most herring are harvested in coastal waters during the spawn­ ing period which commences in late April/mid-May along the Alaska Peninsula and Bristol Bay and progressively later to the north. Spawning occurs at temperatures of 5-12 C and the time of spawning is related to winter water temperatures with early spawning in warm years and 1ate spawning in co1d years. Ouri ng spawning eggs are 166. deposited on vegetation in the intertidal zone of shallow bays and rocky headlands. Eggs hatch in 2-3 weeks as planktonic larvae and metamorphose to juveniles after 6-10 weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Seward Peninsula RAC Transcript Volume 1 Winter 2020
    SEWARD PENINSULA SUBSISTENCE RAC MEETING 3/11/2020 SEWARD PENINSULA RAC MEETING 1 SEWARD PENINSULA FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE REGIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING PUBLIC MEETING VOLUME I Nome Mini-Convention Center Nome, Alaska March 11, 2020 9:07 a.m. Members Present: Tom Gray, Acting Chairman Deahl Katchatag Ronald Kirk Lloyd Kiyutelluk Leland Oyoumick Charles Saccheus Elmer Seetot Regional Council Coordinator -Tom Kron (Acting) Karen Deatherage/phone Recorded and transcribed by: Computer Matrix Court Reporters, LLC 135 Christensen Drive, Suite 2 Anchorage, AK 99501 907-227-5312; [email protected] Computer Matrix, LLC Phone: 907-243-0668 135 Christensen Dr., Ste. 2., Anch. AK 99501 Fax: 907-243-1473 SEWARD PENINSULA SUBSISTENCE RAC MEETING 3/11/2020 SEWARD PENINSULA RAC MEETING 1 Page 2 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 3 (Nome, Alaska - 3/11/2020) 4 5 (On record) 6 7 ACTING CHAIR GRAY: If I could get 8 everybody to stand I'd appreciate it. Take your hat 9 off. So I'm going to give the invocation. 10 11 (Invocation) 12 13 ACTING CHAIR GRAY: Thank you. Okay, 14 so I'm going to call the meeting to order so we're 15 official. And I get to be the guy running the meeting. 16 Louis is -- he called me from Ruby yesterday saying 17 they're stuck -- they're not stuck, they're actually 18 moving again but him and his brother and nieces and so 19 on and so forth are driving snowmachines to Nome from 20 somewhere, and it's taken longer than they expected.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Industry of Alaska in 1928
    MINERAL RESOURCES OF ALASKA, 1928 MINERAL INDUSTRY OF ALASKA IN 1928 By PHILIP S. SMITH 1 INTRODUCTION For many years the mineral industry has been one of the main contributors to. the development of Alaska, if not the main industry. To assist in fostering this industry the Federal Government through the Geological Survey has for 30 years paid considerable attention to the problems relating to the industry and, by means of its studies of the distribution, character, origin, and extent of ore deposits, has kept those interested in mining developments informed of the facts of significance to the prospector, the miner, or the business man. One of the phases of these investigations that has obvious value is an annual record of the kinds and quantity of mineral produced, as such a record furnishes measures of the size and trend of the industry. It is to supply this information that the Geological Sur- vey collects annually records of the production of all mineral com- modities and makes these records available through annual reports, of which this one is the twenty-fifth. 2 The collection of the data necessary for these annual statements is by no means a simple matter, because the great size of the Terri­ tory, the diversity of its mineral products, and the large numbers but small size of many of the enterprises make it impracticable to gather all the desired information at first hand. The information must therefore be obtained from many sources, which necessarily vary in reliability and completeness. Among the most reliable sources are the field engineers, geologists, and topographers of the Geological Survey engaged in Alaskan surveys, who acquire much accurate information regarding the mineral production of the regions 1 The statistics in this chapter have been compiled largely by Miss L.
    [Show full text]
  • Ii APPLIED RANGE ECOLOGY of REINDEER (Rangifer Tarandus Tarandus) on the SEWARD PENINSULA, ALASKA a THESIS Presented to The
    ii APPLIED RANGE ECOLOGY OF REINDEER (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) ON THE SEWARD PENINSULA, ALASKA A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Gregory L. Finstad, B.S. Fairbanks, Alaska May 2008 iii ABSTRACT Linking variation of the environment to animal production is key to successful range management. Ecological site descriptions (ESDs) are landscape units used by land managers for the grazing management of domestic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) on the Seward Peninsula, Alaska. This study investigated the appropriateness of using ESDs for the grazing management of reindeer and explored the use of alternate units to link landscape variation to animal production. ESD composition of reindeer ranges varied across the Seward Peninsula, but there was no relationship to either animal production, estimated by June calf weight and cow/calf ratios, or reindeer serum and tissue mineral concentrations. I have shown that reindeer do not graze uniformly across ESDs, but are selective, both temporally and spatially, in what they consume. Reindeer diet selection and animal production appear to be driven by temporal variation in the nutritional characteristics of individual forage species. Biomass production and seasonal nutritional characteristics of forage species were used develop a computerized mapping program for reindeer producers to identify high quality grazing areas. Production among herds was related with identified forage sources of protein in the diet. Reindeer in herds with smaller June calves consumed more catkins, stems and leaf buds of shrubs in May, presumably to compensate for lower protein reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Ecology Catalog
    Prepared in cooperation with Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program (OCS Study, BOEM 2016-048) Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Ecology Catalog Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5038 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photographs of various fish studied for this report. Background photograph shows Arctic icebergs and ice floes. Photograph from iStock™, dated March 23, 2011. Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Ecology Catalog By Lyman K. Thorsteinson and Milton S. Love, editors Prepared in cooperation with Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program (OCS Study, BOEM 2016-048) Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5038 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://store.usgs.gov. Disclaimer: This Scientific Investigations Report has been technically reviewed and approved for publication by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. The information is provided on the condition that neither the U.S. Geological Survey nor the U.S. Government may be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of this information. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Management Report Norton Sound, Port Clarence, and Arctic, Kotzebue Areas
    Fishery Management Report No. 17-41 2016 Annual Management Report Norton Sound, Port Clarence, and Arctic, Kotzebue Areas by Jim Menard Joyce Soong Jenefer Bell and Larry Neff November 2017 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Divisions of Sport Fish and Commercial Fisheries Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, and Special Publications. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative all standard mathematical deciliter dL Code AAC signs, symbols and gram g all commonly accepted abbreviations hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., alternate hypothesis HA kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. base of natural logarithm e kilometer km all commonly accepted catch per unit effort CPUE liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., coefficient of variation CV meter m R.N., etc. common test statistics (F, t, χ2, etc.) milliliter mL at @ confidence interval CI millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient east E (multiple) R Weights and measures (English) north N correlation coefficient cubic feet per second ft3/s south S (simple) r foot ft west W covariance cov gallon gal copyright degree (angular ) ° inch in corporate suffixes: degrees of freedom df mile mi Company Co.
    [Show full text]