Future of Stations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Future of Stations Future of Stations 1 This report is a product of collaboration between Arup Foresight and Arup teams across the Contents world. We would like to thank all contributors for their input and advice. Foresight is Arup’s internal think-tank and consultancy which focuses on the future of the built environment and society at large. We help organisations understand trends, explore new ideas, and radically rethink the future of their businesses. We developed the concept of ‘foresight by design’, which uses innovative design tools and techniques in order to bring new ideas to life, and INTRODUCTION to engage all stakeholders in meaningful conversations about change. 5 Foreword For more information, please email [email protected] 6 Six principles 7 Executive summary 8 Drivers shaping the future of multi-modal transit hubs CHAPTERS 10 Human-centred design 20 Digital experiences and value propositions 30 Diversification of spatial uses and facilities 40 Seamless mode and service integration 50 Catalysts for sustainability and resilience 60 Urban regeneration and (social) mobility COVID-19 70 Adapting in times of a global pandemic 72 Implications for future stations October 2020 VISION 74 Welcome to the future station 13 Fitzroy Street 76 Future of stations illustration London W1T 4BQ 78 Future of stations vignettes arup.com foresight.arup.com © Arup 2020 82 References 85 Contributors 87 About Arup ‘HONG KONG STATION’ INTRODUCTION Chad McCail, 1998 Foreword Detail, Pencil on paper, Collection Ove Arup and Partners, No COAP0117 NILLE JUUL-SORENSEN Global Architecture Business Leader, Arup Stations are critical pieces of national and future? Advertising, ticketing and rental urban infrastructure. They are central nodes revenue? The sustainable movement of people for inter- and inner-city mobility, provide and goods? Efficient and low-cost operations? easy access to facilities and services, and are Or stations as an enabler for economic growth enablers of economic growth, regeneration and and social advancement? the development of new communities. Their potential for societal and environmental benefit This report explores the trends shaping new extends far beyond current epidemiological and existing station assets. It focuses on large concerns: stations can play a critical role in the inner-city transport interchanges that combine recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic towards long-distance travel, last mile mobility, and a more equitable and sustainable future. mixed-use commercial offerings, but there are lessons for stations at any scale. It explores As mixed-use hubs for people to move, work, what it may mean to deliver ‘value’ and a shop and meet, stations are a fascinating good ‘return on investment’ in the future. and fast-changing typology. Today, new And it proposes principles we should consider transport modes and business models, digital for the user experience, operation and design lifestyles, changing retail patterns, economic, of a station. environmental and health concerns are inviting the question of what a station can and should The future is never singular. As such, this is look like in the future. not a prediction of what all stations can and should look like. Instead, we offer a summary For owners of station assets, for city planners, of the trends, themes and concepts that will and for designers and developers of stations redefine transport hubs in the long-term, and the challenge is to create and maximise the recommendations to consider in the design, value of investment. This applies to new operation and experience of stations. I hope stations as well as the redesign of existing these stand as a point of departure from where ones. What will determine our understanding we can redefine what a station is, and where it of ‘value’ and ‘return on investment’ in the can take us. 4 5 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Six principles Executive summary Station boundaries should Supported by digital technology and the removal of gate lines and ticketing be porous to support infrastructure, station buildings should dissolve, becoming part of the city to greater access and use ease interchange, reduce operating costs and improve sustainability. Stations should diversify As thresholds blur, the station offer must reflect a wider community of users, Why and how we use transport is changing. how real-time data will improve the legibility beyond transport to with 24/7 operation and new retail and lifestyle trends supporting a variety of This is the result of global urbanisation, digital and efficiency of station spaces for both users embrace convenience amenities, from childcare to public services. lifestyles, and new modes. Global passenger use and operators. of public transport is expected to increase by up to 300% by 2050, while the transport sector as a Ideas for re-imagining and diversifying whole is already the fastest-growing contributor station space are addressed in the next section, Modes should be integrated, Diverse transport options – whether cycles, e-scooters or shared to climate emissions. Stations, as the gateway to accounting for future shifts in how we shop, not just accommodated autonomous vehicles – should be incorporated into, under and through mass transit, have a vital role to play in enabling work and live. This is followed by a focus buildings, prioritising active, shared and low-carbon transport. Charging the former and combating the latter. on mode and service integration, looking at points and the flexible allocation of kerbs will be key. how stations can act as a single simplified This report considers exactly this role, exploring system while also offering new mobility and a future in which station boundaries blur – logistics possibilities. The last two sections see between public and private, physical and digital, future stations as key actors within their wider Excellent user experiences Natural and intuitive wayfinding should make stations legible and efficient. A the building and the city – and where stations contexts, looking at energy and resilience, should be universal digital layer should combine with analogue, human-centred infrastructure to are an enabler for sustainability, well-being and economic vitality and social mobility work for all users, regardless of their needs. and opportunity. respectively. Our research builds on Arup’s recent The key design features and implications of each Transformative Rail report to consider the section are brought together in an illustration, Adaptable buildings and Station design should enable adaptation as needs change. Data-driven impact of multiple trends on the future design, visualising how these factors might appear in an dynamic systems will maximise systems equipped with AI will inform real-time space and mode utilisation, role and experience of multi-modal stations. imagined future landscape. A concluding vision efficiency and resilience as well as efficient energy use and predictive maintenance. It looks first at the importance of creating an of a future station then draws together the key underlying basis of analogue, human-centred findings and themes, and lessons from global infrastructure that works hand-in hand with case studies. It highlights that future stations digital technologies to provide a positive have the potential to go beyond their traditional Station benefits will be Station value must be captured to promote long-term financial sustainability. experience for all. The report then considers the transport function to provide us with multiple environmental and social, By delivering them in partnership, their ability to catalyse local sustainability evolution of digital ticketing and its impact on new destinations – in terms of urban economies, not just economic and bring inclusive growth can be recognised and emphasised. station space, including barrier-free travel, and social inclusion and environmental sustainability. 6 7 INTRODUCTION Drivers shaping the future of multi-modal stations human presenceuser-centricity neighbourhood integration healthy streets inclusion This report is concerned with the future of inclusive growth multi-modal stations, i.e. mobility hubs and big data and AI interchanges that combine multiple forms of digital ticketing sensing environments transport. These are referred to as ‘stations’ digital lifestyleswell-being digital twins T integrated wi- and 5G throughout, with the research and insights ech al n hyper-efcient logistics relevant for various modal configurations. ci ol o og seamless transfers S ic a efcient and exible systems l The modes considered by this report include those available now (walking, cycling, rail, light-rail, metro, ferry, bus), new and emerging cross-sector funding modes (scooters, and various electric, destination stations autonomous or shared modes), as well as future community cohesion regional connectivity c P i capitalising on convenience and unproven modes (Hyperloop, passenger o m l i o district energy schemes t dynamic value creation drones). Consideration has also been given i n c a o new revenue streams to freight, including rail and other integrated personal data l c E freight, delivery drones and cargo bots. responsible business place-making strategic densication The trends illustrated on the next page also dynamic and on-demand services E l point to an increase in non-transport station connected network nvironmenta functions. As such, the research looks beyond renewable energy generation one governing body smart building controls resilient infrastructure ing standards green infrastructure
Recommended publications
  • The Operator's Story Case Study: Guangzhou's Story
    Railway and Transport Strategy Centre The Operator’s Story Case Study: Guangzhou’s Story © World Bank / Imperial College London Property of the World Bank and the RTSC at Imperial College London Community of Metros CoMET The Operator’s Story: Notes from Guangzhou Case Study Interviews February 2017 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a permanent record for the researchers of what was said by people interviewed for ‘The Operator’s Story’ in Guangzhou, China. These notes are based upon 3 meetings on the 11th March 2016. This document will ultimately form an appendix to the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’ piece. Although the findings have been arranged and structured by Imperial College London, they remain a collation of thoughts and statements from interviewees, and continue to be the opinions of those interviewed, rather than of Imperial College London. Prefacing the notes is a summary of Imperial College’s key findings based on comments made, which will be drawn out further in the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’. Method This content is a collation in note form of views expressed in the interviews that were conducted for this study. This mini case study does not attempt to provide a comprehensive picture of Guangzhou Metropolitan Corporation (GMC), but rather focuses on specific topics of interest to The Operators’ Story project. The research team thank GMC and its staff for their kind participation in this project. Comments are not attributed to specific individuals, as agreed with the interviewees and GMC. List of interviewees Meetings include the following GMC members: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • London Guide Welcome to London
    Visitor information Welcome to London Your guide to getting around central London on public transport and making the most of your visit. tfl.gov.uk/visitinglondon Tube and central London bus maps inside #LondonIsOpen Welcome to London Paying for your travel Public transport is the best way to get There are different ways to pay for your around London and discover all that the travel. For most people, pay as you go - city has to offer. This guide will help you paying for the trips you make - with a plan how to get around the Capital on contactless payment card, an Oyster card or public transport. a Visitor Oyster card, is the best option as it If you have just arrived at an airport and are offers value, flexibility and convenience. looking for ways to get to central London, go to page 11 in this guide. Getting around London London’s transport system is iconic. With its world famous Underground (Tube) and iconic red buses, travelling around the Capital is an experience in itself. But London is much more than just the Tube or the bus; our vast network of transport services includes: Contactless payment cards If your credit, debit, charge card or wearable device has the contactless symbol above you can use it for pay as you go travel on London’s public transport. Android Pay and Apple Pay are also accepted. Benefits of contactless • It’s quick and easy – there’s no need to queue to buy a ticket • It offers great value – pay as you go with contactless is better value than buying a single ticket and you can benefit from both Night Tube daily and weekly capping (see page 5) • 14 million people have used contactless Night Tube services run on the to travel in London – including customers Jubilee, Victoria and most of from over 90 countries the Central and Northern lines all night on Fridays and Saturdays.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographs in Bold Acacia Avenue 64 Ackroyd, Peter 54 Alcohol 162–3 Aldgate 12 Ashcombe Walker, Herbert 125 Ashford In
    smoothly from harrow index Cobb, Richard 173 Evening Standard 71, 104 INDEX Coffee 148–9 Fenchurch Street station 50, 152, 170 Collins, Wilkie 73 Film 102, 115 Conan Doyle, Arthur 27 Fleet line 210 Photographs in bold Conrad, Joseph 138 Food 146–7, 162. 188, 193 Cornford, Frances 78 Forster, EM 212 Acacia Avenue 64 Blake, William 137 Cortázar, Julio 163 Freesheets (newspapers) 104 Ackroyd, Peter 54 Bond, James 25, 102, 214 Crash (novel) 226 Freud, Sigmund 116, 119 Alcohol 162–3 Bowie, David 54, 55, 56, 90 Crossrail 204 Frisch, Max 13 Aldgate 12 Bowlby, Rachel 191 Cufflinks 156 Frotteurism 119 Ashcombe Walker, Herbert 125 Bowler hat 24 Cunningham, Gail 112 Fulham 55 Ashford International station 121 Bridges, in London 12, 32, 101, 154 Cyclist see Bicycles Gaiman, Neil 23 Austen, Jane 59 Briefcase 79 Dagenham 198 Galsworthy, John 173 Baker Street station 168, 215 Brighton 54 Dalston 55 Garden Cities 76–7, 106, 187 Balham station 134 Brixton 55 Davenant, William 38 Good Life, The (TV series) 54, 59, 158 Ball, Benjamin 116 Bromley 55 Davies, Ray 218 Guildford 64, 206 Ballard, JG 20, 55, 72, 112, 226 Bromley-by-Bow station 102, 213 De Botton, Alain 42, 110, 116 Great Missenden 60–1 Banbury 127 Buckinghamshire 20, 54, 57, 64 Deighton, Len 41 Green, Roger 16, 96, 229 Bank station 138, 152, 153 Burtonwood 36 De La Mare, Walter 20 Hackney 8, 13, 65, 121 Barker, Paul 54, 56, 81 Buses 15, 41, 111, 115, 129, 130, Derrida, Jacques 117 Hamilton, Patrick 114 Barking 213 134, 220–1 Diary of a Nobody, The 11, 23, 65, 195 Hampstead 54, 58, 121 Barnes, Julian
    [Show full text]
  • Bay to Bay: China's Greater Bay Area Plan and Its Synergies for US And
    June 2021 Bay to Bay China’s Greater Bay Area Plan and Its Synergies for US and San Francisco Bay Area Business Acknowledgments Contents This report was prepared by the Bay Area Council Economic Institute for the Hong Kong Trade Executive Summary ...................................................1 Development Council (HKTDC). Sean Randolph, Senior Director at the Institute, led the analysis with support from Overview ...................................................................5 Niels Erich, a consultant to the Institute who co-authored Historic Significance ................................................... 6 the paper. The Economic Institute is grateful for the valuable information and insights provided by a number Cooperative Goals ..................................................... 7 of subject matter experts who shared their views: Louis CHAPTER 1 Chan (Assistant Principal Economist, Global Research, China’s Trade Portal and Laboratory for Innovation ...9 Hong Kong Trade Development Council); Gary Reischel GBA Core Cities ....................................................... 10 (Founding Managing Partner, Qiming Venture Partners); Peter Fuhrman (CEO, China First Capital); Robbie Tian GBA Key Node Cities............................................... 12 (Director, International Cooperation Group, Shanghai Regional Development Strategy .............................. 13 Institute of Science and Technology Policy); Peijun Duan (Visiting Scholar, Fairbank Center for Chinese Studies Connecting the Dots ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019 Mobility
    (a joint stock limited company incorporated in the People’s Republic of China with limited liability) Stock Code: 1766 Annual Report Annual Report 2019 Mobility 2019 for Future Connection Important 1 The Board and the Supervisory Committee of the Company and its Directors, Supervisors and Senior Management warrant that there are no false representations, misleading statements contained in or material omissions from this annual report and they will assume joint and several legal liabilities for the truthfulness, accuracy and completeness of the contents disclosed herein. 2 This report has been considered and approved at the seventeenth meeting of the second session of the Board of the Company. All Directors attended the Board meeting. 3 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA LLP has issued standard unqualified audit report for the Company’s financial statements prepared under the China Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises in accordance with PRC Auditing Standards. 4 Liu Hualong, the Chairman of the Company, Li Zheng, the Chief Financial Officer and Wang Jian, the head of the Accounting Department (person in charge of accounting affairs) warrant the truthfulness, accuracy and completeness of the financial statements in this annual report. 5 Statement for the risks involved in the forward-looking statements: this report contains forward-looking statements that involve future plans and development strategies which do not constitute a substantive commitment by the Company to investors. Investors should be aware of the investment risks. 6 The Company has proposed to distribute a cash dividend of RMB0.15 (tax inclusive) per share to all Shareholders based on the total share capital of the Company of 28,698,864,088 shares as at 31 December 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Technologies for Light Rail and Tram: a European Reference Resource
    Innovative Technologies for Light Rail and Tram: A European reference resource Briefing Paper 4 Traction Battery - NiMH and PRIMOVE Systems September 2015 Sustainable transport for North-West Europe’s periphery Sintropher is a five-year €23m transnational cooperation project with the aim of enhancing local and regional transport provision to, from and withing five peripheral regions in North-West Europe. INTERREG IVB INTERREG IVB North-West Europe is a financial instrument of the European Union’s Cohesion Policy. It funds projects which support transnational cooperation. Innovative technologies for light rail and tram Working in association with the POLIS European transport network, who are kindly hosting these briefing papers on their website. Report produced by University College London Lead Partner of Sintropher project Authors: Charles King, Giacomo Vecia, Imogen Thompson, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London. The paper reflects the views of the authors and should not be taken to be the formal view of UCL or Sintropher project. 4 Innovative technologies for light rail and tram Table of Contents Background .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Innovative technologies for light rail and tram – developing opportunities ................................................... 6 Traction Battery Trams ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RAIL ADAPT Adapting the Railway for the Future Report Authors: a Quinn, a Jack, S Hodgkinson, E Ferranti – University of Birmingham
    November 2017 RAIL ADAPT Adapting the railway for the future Report authors: A Quinn, A Jack, S Hodgkinson, E Ferranti – University of Birmingham J Beckford – Beckford Consulting J Dora – JDCL November 2017 Dr Andrew Quinn, University of Birmingham Centre for Railway Research and Education, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK Email: [email protected] ISBN 978-2-7461-2680-0 Warning No part of this publication may be copied, reproduced or distributed by any means whatsoever, including electronic, except for private and individual use, without the express permission of the International Union of Railways (UIC). The same applies for translation, adaptation or transformation, arrangement or reproduction by any method or procedure whatsoever. The sole exceptions - noting the author’s name and the source - are “analyses and brief quotations justified by the critical, argumentative, educational, scientific or informative nature of the publication into which they are incorporated” (Articles L 122-4 and L122-5 of the French Intellectual Property Code). © International Union of Railways (UIC) - Paris, 2017 Rail Adapt - Adapting the railway for the future Summary for Executives Climate Change: • is a long term, slow acting, but very high impact risk; • affects all parts of railways in all parts of the world but in many different ways; • can have beneficial effects but effects can also be catastrophic; • requires leadership to plan and change but there is the knowledge and the tools to achieve this. • Where does Climate Change feature in your risk register? • How well prepared is your organisation to manage the risks? • Are you asking the right questions about your assets’ future and your investment criteria? • Do you have Climate Change adaptation embedded in all departments? • Are you communicating with stakeholders so that everyone has a shared understanding? These are some of the questions that directors should be asking and answering to ensure the long-term health and sustainability of the organisations they lead, and of the railway sector generally.
    [Show full text]
  • London Bridge Station Redevelopment Factsheet
    London Bridge station A bigger, better London Bridge, fit for the twenty-first century A station transformed One unified station accessible for all users. This includes people with special mobility, visual, We've rebuilt London Bridge station, For the first time in its history, all 15 cognitive and hearing requirements. transforming central London’s oldest platforms at London Bridge are now The entire station is accessible for station into a station fit for the accessible from one central space, passengers with reduced mobility, twenty-first century by making it simplifying the layout of the station with all platforms accessible by lift modern, spacious and fully for passengers. The huge, street for the first time. Seven new lifts accessible. This has all been level concourse is the largest in the have been installed in total. achieved while keeping the UK’s United Kingdom, and is roughly the fourth busiest station open for the size of the pitch at Wembley Other accessibility improvements 50 million passengers that use the Stadium. include tactile paving to support station each year. wayfinding, a Changing Places toilet, We've also unified staff facilities at induction loops throughout the Work began in 2012 with the the station, bringing Network Rail station and accessibility assistance removal of the old train shed, parts and train operator staff together in points at every entrance. of which were preserved and one welfare area. The new, state of donated to the Vale of Rheidol the art control room, located above An exciting destination Railway in Aberystwyth. the ticket office, is also a joint facility, encouraging collaboration The redevelopment of the station is To keep the station open among the station staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Tramway Renaissance
    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE www.lrta.org www.tautonline.com OCTOBER 2018 NO. 970 FLORENCE CONTINUES ITS TRAMWAY RENAISSANCE InnoTrans 2018: Looking into light rail’s future Brussels, Suzhou and Aarhus openings Gmunden line linked to Traunseebahn Funding agreed for Vancouver projects LRT automation Bydgoszcz 10> £4.60 How much can and Growth in Poland’s should we aim for? tram-building capital 9 771460 832067 London, 3 October 2018 Join the world’s light and urban rail sectors in recognising excellence and innovation BOOK YOUR PLACE TODAY! HEADLINE SUPPORTER ColTram www.lightrailawards.com CONTENTS 364 The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association OCTOBER 2018 Vol. 81 No. 970 www.tautonline.com EDITORIAL EDITOR – Simon Johnston [email protected] ASSOCIATE EDITOr – Tony Streeter [email protected] WORLDWIDE EDITOR – Michael Taplin 374 [email protected] NewS EDITOr – John Symons [email protected] SenIOR CONTRIBUTOR – Neil Pulling WORLDWIDE CONTRIBUTORS Tony Bailey, Richard Felski, Ed Havens, Andrew Moglestue, Paul Nicholson, Herbert Pence, Mike Russell, Nikolai Semyonov, Alain Senut, Vic Simons, Witold Urbanowicz, Bill Vigrass, Francis Wagner, Thomas Wagner, 379 Philip Webb, Rick Wilson PRODUCTION – Lanna Blyth NEWS 364 SYSTEMS FACTFILE: bydgosZCZ 384 Tel: +44 (0)1733 367604 [email protected] New tramlines in Brussels and Suzhou; Neil Pulling explores the recent expansion Gmunden joins the StadtRegioTram; Portland in what is now Poland’s main rolling stock DESIGN – Debbie Nolan and Washington prepare new rolling stock manufacturing centre. ADVertiSING plans; Federal and provincial funding COMMERCIAL ManageR – Geoff Butler Tel: +44 (0)1733 367610 agreed for two new Vancouver LRT projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Some Airport-Rail Links Get Built and Others Do Not: the Role of Institutions, Equity and Financing
    Why some airport-rail links get built and others do not: the role of institutions, equity and financing by Julia Nickel S.M. in Engineering Systems- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010 Vordiplom in Wirtschaftsingenieurwesen- Universität Karlsruhe, 2007 Submitted to the Department of Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Political Science at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2011 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2011. All rights reserved. Author . Department of Political Science October 12, 2010 Certified by . Kenneth Oye Associate Professor of Political Science Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Roger Peterson Arthur and Ruth Sloan Professor of Political Science Chair, Graduate Program Committee 1 Why some airport-rail links get built and others do not: the role of institutions, equity and financing by Julia Nickel Submitted to the Department of Political Science On October 12, 2010, in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Political Science Abstract The thesis seeks to provide an understanding of reasons for different outcomes of airport ground access projects. Five in-depth case studies (Hongkong, Tokyo-Narita, London- Heathrow, Chicago- O’Hare and Paris-Charles de Gaulle) and eight smaller case studies (Kuala Lumpur, Seoul, Shanghai-Pudong, Bangkok, Beijing, Rome- Fiumicino, Istanbul-Atatürk and Munich- Franz Josef Strauss) are conducted. The thesis builds on existing literature that compares airport-rail links by explicitly considering the influence of the institutional environment of an airport on its ground access situation and by paying special attention to recently opened dedicated airport expresses in Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Tram and Public Transit Integration in Chinese Cities A
    Modern Tram and Public Transit Integration in Chinese Cities A Case Study of Suzhou Discussion Paper No. 2017-xx Prepared for the Roundtable on [Integrated and Sustainable Urban Transport] (24-25 April 2017, Tokyo) Chia-Lin Chen Department of Urban Planning and Design, Xian Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China Disclaimer: This paper has been submitted by the author for discussion at an ITF Roundtable. Content and format have not been reviewed or edited by ITF and are the sole responsibility of the author. The paper is made available as a courtesy to Roundtable participants to foster discussion and scientific exchange. A revised version will be published in the ITF Discussion Papers series after the Roundtable. The International Transport Forum The International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organisation with 57 member countries. It acts as a think tank for transport policy and organises the Annual Summit of transport ministers. ITF is the only global body that covers all transport modes. The ITF is politically autonomous and administratively integrated with the OECD. The ITF works for transport policies that improve peoples’ lives. Our mission is to foster a deeper understanding of the role of transport in economic growth, environmental sustainability and social inclusion and to raise the public profile of transport policy. The ITF organises global dialogue for better transport. We act as a platform for discussion and pre-negotiation of policy issues across all transport modes. We analyse trends, share knowledge and promote exchange among transport decision-makers and civil society. The ITF’s Annual Summit is the world’s largest gathering of transport ministers and the leading global platform for dialogue on transport policy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Suzhou
    Economics of Transportation xxx (2017) 1–16 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Economics of Transportation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecotra Tram development and urban transport integration in Chinese cities: A case study of Suzhou Chia-Lin Chen Department of Urban Planning and Design, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Room EB510, Built Environment Cluster, 111 Renai Road, Dushu Lake Higher Education Town, Suzhou Industrial Park, Jiangsu Province, 215123, PR China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT JEL classification: This paper explores a new phenomenon of tram development in Chinese cities where tram is used as an alternative H7 transport system to drive urban development. The Suzhou National High-tech District tram was investigated as a J6 case study. Two key findings are highlighted. Firstly, the new tramway was routed along the “path of least resis- P2 tance”–avoiding dense urban areas, to reduce conflict with cars. Secondly, regarding urban transport integration, R3 four perspectives were evaluated, namely planning and design, service operation, transport governance and user R4 experience. Findings show insufficient integration in the following aspects, namely tram and bus routes and services, O2 fares on multi-modal journeys, tram station distribution, service intervals, and luggage auxiliary support. The paper Keywords: argues there is a need for a critical review of the role of tram and for context-based innovative policy reform and Tram governance that could possibly facilitate a successful introduction and integration of tram into a city. Urban development Urban transport integration Suzhou China 1. Introduction so instead began planning tram networks. There has been relatively little research examining how new trams have been introduced into cities and The past decade has seen rapid development of urban rail systems in whether these tramways provide an effective alternative to private car use.
    [Show full text]