DOCSLIB.ORG

DAC Peer Review 2019 MEMORANDUM of SWEDEN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DAC Peer Review 2019 MEMORANDUM of SWEDEN Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development __________________________________ DAC Peer Review 2019 MEMORANDUM OF SWEDEN September 2018 Executive summary Sweden contributes actively to global efforts toward reaching the 2030 Agenda. Through its many contributions to the negotiations of the 2030 Agenda, the Paris Agreement, the Addis Ababa Action Agenda on financing for development, the Sendai Framework for Action on Disaster Risk Reduction, Sweden helped secure key elements and strengthen the frameworks for a new global agenda for sustainable development. Sweden also continues to be a powerful voice in multilateral organisations and has taken an active role in many areas and processes, demonstrating its commitment to joint action and leadership for global sustainable development. As the first country in the world, Sweden adopted a Feminist Foreign Policy in 2014. The Policy seeks to enhance the rights, representation and resources of all women and girls, and emphasizes that gender equality is a prerequisite for peaceful, democratic and sustainable development. The Feminist Foreign Policy constitutes a backbone to the Government’s development cooperation and humanitarian assistance and its approach to sustainable development. The Government of Sweden follows an ambitious coherence policy, aligning policies and management structures. Through the re-launch of Sweden’s policy for policy coherence for development, the Policy for Global Development in 2014, Sweden ensures that all Swedish policy areas jointly and coherently contribute to an effective implementation of the 2030 Agenda, nationally and internationally. Recognizing that participation from all levels of society is key to reaching the 2030 Agenda, the Swedish Government recently adopted a national action plan, facilitating the contribution of all actors to the national and global implementation of the 2030 Agenda. Policy vision and Framework: Since the last Peer Review, the Government of Sweden has undertaken significant work to reshape policies and guidance, identifying how to best contribute to achieving the aim and objectives of Sweden’s development cooperation and humanitarian assistance. In 2016 the Policy Framework for Swedish Development Cooperation and Humanitarian Assistance was adopted, clearly setting out the goals, priorities and direction of Sweden’s development cooperation. It provides a hierarchy of policies and steering documents, and indicates how the goals of the Swedish development cooperation and humanitarian assistance are to be translated into implementation. The Policy Framework’s takes as point of departure the current global development landscape and relates to the 2030 Agenda, the Addis Agenda and the Paris Agreement. The development cooperation of Sweden is characterised by two overarching perspectives: the perspective of poor people on development and a rights-based perspective. These two perspectives are integrated throughout Sweden’s development cooperation. In addition to the two overarching perspectives, the Policy Framework also highlights three key thematic perspectives: a conflict perspective, a gender perspective and an environmental and climate perspective. Financing for Development: Sweden has a long tradition of a generous and ambitious development cooperation and is committed to allocating 1% of GNI to international development cooperation. Sweden recognizes the importance of the Financing for Development agenda, as outlined in the Addis Agenda, and the central role of private finance in realizing the 2030 Agenda. Over the last five years, Sweden has encouraged the engagement of the private sector and in particular the national private sector, academia and civil society in sustainable development, identifying ways to leverage additional funding as a complement to ODA. Sweden recognizes that development cooperation has an important catalytic role to increase financial flows to support development. Sweden works extensively with innovative financing, including green bonds, guarantees and blended finance. Sida’s guarantee instrument enables mobilisation of additional capital for development and encourages innovative ways of private sector engagement for global poverty eradication. During the period, Sweden has also capitalized, revamped and focused the mandate of its bilateral development finance institute, Swedfund International. 1 Structure and system: Sweden has continued to strengthen the structure and guidance for the implementation of its development cooperation. The new Guidelines for strategies, clarify roles and responsibilities between the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and state agencies responsible for the implementation of the Government strategies for development cooperation. The Guidelines also lay out the process to develop, implement and follow up the strategies. As main implementing agency, Sida has continued to focus on increased field presence, to strengthen the capacity for dialogue and partnership as well as follow-up and monitoring of programmes. Through cooperation on several training courses, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Sida have also strengthen competences in thematic and cross-cutting issues. Since the last review, the Folke Bernadotte Academy and the Swedish Institute has been commissioned to contribute to the implementation of the Government strategies, together with Sida. Delivery modalities and partnership: Swedish development cooperation rests on internationally agreed principles of effective development cooperation, as emphasized in the Policy Framework. Sweden is to ensure that the principles are followed and developed further in Swedish development cooperation as an important prerequisite for planning, implementation and monitoring. A core value in Swedish development cooperation is the respect for partner countries’ ownership for their own development agenda, as manifested in Sida’s partnership approach. In line with the new Policy Framework, and consistent with Sweden’s commitments to aid- and development effectiveness, Sida strives to ensure good partnership and to increase predictability and flexibility for partner countries. Sweden is also committed to joint programs and donor harmonization with other development partners, and taking a leadership role in donor coordination at the country level. Consistent with its commitment to the principle of untied aid, Sweden has since the last peer review accelerated its efforts to increase its levels of untied aid. In 2016, 99.6 % of Sweden’s aid was untied. Results management, evaluation and learning: The Government of Sweden has in recent years put a stronger emphasis on long term results and sustainability, on working holistically and on the principles of aid- and development effectiveness. Sida has worked systematically to strengthen its management for development results and the use of result-based management (RBM), maximizing achievements and continuous learning. Partner organisations have the primary responsibility for monitoring and results and Sida focuses on partner dialogue and capacity building. Reporting of results is based on a context- driven approach and there is no standard set of indicators. As of the new strategy guidelines, there is a stronger focus on results at all stages of the strategy process. The MFA uses results information to inform decision-making for the portfolio at the strategy level. Humanitarian assistance: Sweden’s humanitarian assistance is adapted to the growing humanitarian needs and limited financial resources, and is committed to the Grand Bargain. Flexible humanitarian funding has continued to be a top priority for Sweden as it enables more principled support and increased effectiveness. Seeking to improve synergies, coordination and cooperation between humanitarian assistance and long-term development cooperation several of Sweden’s strategies for development cooperation have been elaborated since the last Peer Review, with the aim of strengthening resilience of vulnerable people, addressing root causes of crises, and seeking synergies and complementarities with humanitarian assistance. Globally, Sweden participates actively in humanitarian coordination fora. As a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council (2017-2018), Sweden promotes a strengthened focus on a principled, non-politicized, humanitarian action. This Memorandum outlines the steps Sweden is taking to contribute to sustainable development, through effective delivery of Sweden’s comprehensive development cooperation and humanitarian assistance. The Government of Sweden recognize the importance of the Peer Review process to donor accountability and to improve the quality and effectiveness of development co-operation policies and systems. Sweden is pleased to submit this Memorandum, and hopes the review provides valuable insights and lessons to share with other OECD DAC donor countries. We are also looking forward to a constructive dialogue on how we can improve and make Swedish development more effective and efficient. 2 Table of contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Abbreviations and acronyms ................................................................................................................ 4 1. Sweden’s global efforts for sustainable development ..................................................................... 5 1.1 Efforts to support global sustainable development ..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Digital Government Review of Sweden Towards a Data-Driven Public Sector
    Digital Government Review of Sweden Towards a Data-driven Public Sector Key findings Revised version – October 2018 Contents 1. BACKGROUND 1 2. STRENGTHENING THE INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE FOR DIGITAL GOVERNMENT IN SWEDEN 6 3. LEVERAGING DATA FOR PUBLIC SECTOR DIGITAL INNOVATION AND INTELLIGENCE 14 4. OPEN GOVERNMENT DATA IN SWEDEN: From transparency to proactive openness, user engagement and public value co-creation 18 BIBLIOGRAPHY 24 NOTES 24 OECD Digital Government and Open Data Unit Digital Government Project KEY FINDINGS KEY DIGITAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW OF SWEDEN 1. Background The OECD Digital Government Review of Sweden builds on The OECD Recommendation on Digital Government Strategies the experience and knowledge acquired by the Reform contains twelve key recommendations grouped in three of the Public Sector Division of the OECD Directorate for main pillars (Figure 1.1) to support countries in realising the Public Governance through similar projects conducted digital transformation of the public sector, and therefore over the past 15 years in a number of OECD member and serves as an overall analytical framework for this review. partner countries. The Recommendation was adopted by the Council in 2014, and applies to all the OECD member countries, as well as to The Review also draws upon the close collaboration non-OECD members that proactively adhere to it. between the OECD and the Swedish Government, including the participation of Sweden in the OECD The aim of the Digital Government Review is to assist the Working Party of Digital Government Officials (E-Leaders), Swedish government in its efforts to take the full benefits of the OECD Expert Group on Open Government Data, digital technologies and data to boost public sector intelligence and the 2016 OECD comparative project on Digital and act as a platform for public value co-creation and Government Strategies for Transforming Public Services sustained public trust.
    [Show full text]
  • The Racist Legacy in Modern Swedish Saami Policy1
    THE RACIST LEGACY IN MODERN SWEDISH SAAMI POLICY1 Roger Kvist Department of Saami Studies Umeå University S-901 87 Umeå Sweden Abstract/Resume The Swedish national state (1548-1846) did not treat the Saami any differently than the population at large. The Swedish nation state (1846- 1971) in practice created a system of institutionalized racism towards the nomadic Saami. Saami organizations managed to force the Swedish welfare state to adopt a policy of ethnic tolerance beginning in 1971. The earlier racist policy, however, left a strong anti-Saami rights legacy among the non-Saami population of the North. The increasing willingness of both the left and the right of Swedish political life to take advantage of this racist legacy, makes it unlikely that Saami self-determination will be realized within the foreseeable future. L'état suédois national (1548-1846) n'a pas traité les Saami d'une manière différente de la population générale. L'Etat de la nation suédoise (1846- 1971) a créé en pratique un système de racisme institutionnalisé vers les Saami nomades. Les organisations saamies ont réussi à obliger l'Etat- providence suédois à adopter une politique de tolérance ethnique à partir de 1971. Pourtant, la politique précédente de racisme a fait un legs fort des droits anti-saamis parmi la population non-saamie du nord. En con- séquence de l'empressement croissant de la gauche et de la droite de la vie politique suédoise de profiter de ce legs raciste, il est peu probable que l'autodétermination soit atteinte dans un avenir prévisible. 204 Roger Kvist Introduction In 1981 the Supreme Court of Sweden stated that the Saami right to reindeer herding, and adjacent rights to hunting and fishing, was a form of private property.
    [Show full text]
  • Prime Minister and Cabinet Portfolio
    Senate Finance and Public Administration Legislation Committee ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE Budget Estimates Hearing 27 May-6 June 2013 Prime Minister and Cabinet Portfolio Department/Agency: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet Outcome/Program: 1.1 Prime Minister and Cabinet Topic: Hospitality and Entertainment Senator: Senator Ryan Question reference number: 77 Type of Question: Written Date set by the committee for the return of answer: 12 July 2013 Number of pages: 5 Question: What is the Department/Agency's hospitality spend for this financial year to date? Detail date, location, purpose and cost of all events including any catering and drinks costs. For each Minister and Parliamentary Secretary office, please detail total hospitality spend for this financial year to date. Detail date, location, purpose and cost of all events including any catering and drinks costs. What is the Department/Agency's entertainment spend for this financial year to date? Detail date, location, purpose and cost of all events including any catering and drinks costs. For each Minister and Parliamentary Secretary office, please detail total entertainment spend for this financial year to date. Detail date, location, purpose and cost of all events including any catering and drinks costs. What hospitality spend is the Department/Agency's planning on spending? Detail date, location, purpose and cost of all events including any catering and drinks costs. For each Minister and Parliamentary Secretary office, what hospitality spend is currently being planned for? Detail date, location, purpose and cost of all events including any catering and drinks costs. What entertainment spend is the Department/Agency's planning on spending? Detail date, location, purpose and cost of all events including any catering and drinks costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Politics and Views on Brexit
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 8362, 2 May 2019 The EU27: Internal Politics By Stefano Fella, Vaughne Miller, Nigel Walker and Views on Brexit Contents: 1. Austria 2. Belgium 3. Bulgaria 4. Croatia 5. Cyprus 6. Czech Republic 7. Denmark 8. Estonia 9. Finland 10. France 11. Germany 12. Greece 13. Hungary 14. Ireland 15. Italy 16. Latvia 17. Lithuania 18. Luxembourg 19. Malta 20. Netherlands 21. Poland 22. Portugal 23. Romania 24. Slovakia 25. Slovenia 26. Spain 27. Sweden www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 The EU27: Internal Politics and Views on Brexit Contents Summary 6 1. Austria 13 1.1 Key Facts 13 1.2 Background 14 1.3 Current Government and Recent Political Developments 15 1.4 Views on Brexit 17 2. Belgium 25 2.1 Key Facts 25 2.2 Background 25 2.3 Current Government and recent political developments 26 2.4 Views on Brexit 28 3. Bulgaria 32 3.1 Key Facts 32 3.2 Background 32 3.3 Current Government and recent political developments 33 3.4 Views on Brexit 35 4. Croatia 37 4.1 Key Facts 37 4.2 Background 37 4.3 Current Government and recent political developments 38 4.4 Views on Brexit 39 5. Cyprus 42 5.1 Key Facts 42 5.2 Background 42 5.3 Current Government and recent political developments 43 5.4 Views on Brexit 45 6. Czech Republic 49 6.1 Key Facts 49 6.2 Background 49 6.3 Current Government and recent political developments 50 6.4 Views on Brexit 53 7.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participants
    List of Participants Title Last Name Fist name Company Function Ms ABBAS RASHO KHALAF Farida Yazda Ms ABRAMOVA Iuliana WAVE Member of Advisory Board Ms ABRASHEVA Desislava Ministry of Justice of Bulgaria Head of the Cabinet of the Minister of Justice Ms ACAR Ayse Feride Council of Europe President of GREVIO ACCARDO Nicola European Commission Ms ACH Coline European Parliament Parliamentary assistant Ms ADAMO Chiara European Commission Head of Unit "Fundamental Rights Policy" Ms AGAPIOU JOSEPHIDES Kalliope Chair, Management Board Ms AGHATISE Esohe Associazione IROKO Onlus Executive Director Mr AGOTHA Anthony European Commission Member of Cabinet First Vice-President Ms AHER Kaidi Office of the President Head of the Communication Department Ms AHLADOVA Desislava Ministry of Justice of Bulgaria Deputy Minister of Justice Ms AHMED Ifrah Ifrah Foundation Director Ms AITTONIEMI Eeva Ministry of Justice Ministerial adviser Mr ALATOPOULOS Filippos - Kyriakos European Parliament Temporary Official / Vice-Presidents' Secretariat Ms ALBU Laura European Women's Lobby Member Executive Committee Mr ALBUQUERQUE Daniel European Commission Ms ALTINISIK Serap European Women's Lobby Programme Director AMIRAN Pirumashvili Georgian Public Broadcasting Ms ANDRAŠEK Valentina Women Against Violence Europe Country Delegate Mrs ANDRASSY Irena European Commission Ms ANDRIEUX Isabelle ING Mr ANGELOPOULOS Georgios Ms ANITA Sarkeesian Feminist Frequency Mrs ANTANOVIČA Agnija LETA Journalist Social Issues Ms AREVALO CASAS Sara EDF Personal Assistant Mrs ARRILLAGA Ana
    [Show full text]
  • Nordic Health Care Systems Pb:Nordic Health Care Systems Pb 11/8/09 14:04 Page 1
    Nordic Health Care Systems pb:Nordic Health Care Systems pb 11/8/09 14:04 Page 1 Nordic Health Care Systems Recent Reforms and Current Policy Challenges European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Series “The book is very valuable as actual information about the health systems in the Nordic countries and the changes that have been made during the last two decades. It informs well both about the similarities within the ‘Nordic Health Model’ and the important differences that exist between the countries.” Bo Könberg, County Governor, Former Minister of Health and Social Insurance in Sweden (1991-1994) “The publishing of this book about the Nordic health care systems is a major Nordic Health Care Systems event for those interested not only in Nordic health policy and health systems but also for everybody interested in comparative health policy and health systems. It is the first book in its kind. It covers the four “large” Nordic countries, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland, and does so in a very systematically comparative way. The book is well organized, covers “everything” and is analytically sophisticated.” Ole Berg, Professor of Health Management, University of Oslo This book examines recent patterns of health reform in Nordic health care systems, and the balance between stability and change in how these systems have developed. Nordic Health Care Systems The health systems in Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Finland are investigated through detailed comparisons along a variety of policy-driven parameters. The following themes are explored: Recent Reforms and Current Policy Challenges • Politicians, patients, and professions Financing, production, and distribution • &Saltman Magnussen,Vrangbaek • The role of the primary health sector • The role of public health • Internal management mechanisms • Impact of the European Union The book probes the impact of these topics and then contrasts the development across all four coumntries, allowing the reader to gain a sense of perspective both on the individual systems as well as on the region as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Presentation May 2021 SEK Is to Strengthen the Mission Competitiveness of the Swedish Export Industry and Create Employment and Sustainable Growth in Sweden
    Investor presentation May 2021 SEK is to strengthen the Mission competitiveness of the Swedish export industry and create employment and sustainable growth in Sweden. A sustainable world through Vision increased Swedish export. 2 100% Owned by the Swedish Government Kingdom of Sweden Population 10 million Surface 450 000 km2 Capital Stockholm Language Swedish, English widely spoken Political system Parliamentary democracy European status Inside EU, outside Euro Currency Swedish Krona 4 % Public Debt to GDP 250 Economy of Sweden 200 150 Rating AAA/Aaa/Aaa 100 GDP Growth Q4 2020 (QoQ/YoY) -0.2% / -2.2% 50 GDP Growth 2020 -2.8% 0 GDP 2020 USD 538 bn* Japan Italy USA GDP per capita 2020 USD 51 950* France Germany Sweden Unemployment March 2021 9.5%** bps 5 year CDS spreads CPI/CPIF*** March 2021 (YoY) 1.7% / 1.9% 200 Repo Rate April 2021 0% 150 100 * USD/SEK average 2020, 9.20 ** Seasonally adjusted, % of labour force 50 *** CPIF = CPI with fixed mortgage rates 0 Source: Bloomberg, IMF, SCB 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Sweden Italy France 5 Germany Japan USA Swedish Exports Large part of GDP and well diversified Key export goods Exports and Imports % Share of GDP 55 Materials 18% 50 Consumer goods 16% 45 Machinery 15% Auto 14% 40 IT & telecom 11% 35 Pulp & paper 10% 30 Health care 8% 25 Energy 5% Construction 3% Export Import Source: SCB as of December 31, 2020 6 Swedish exporters SEK has a complementary role in the market . Our offering provides a complement to bank and capital market finance for exporters that want a range of different financing sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosperity and Sustainability – Local Cooperation in the Baltic Sea Region
    AUGUST 16–18, 2006 Summary of the conference in Visby Prosperity and Sustainability – Local Cooperation in the Baltic Sea Region Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................... 3 Theme 1: Strengthening Cooperation between Local, National and European Actors in the Baltic Sea Region ....................................................... 4 Experiences from Three Different Border Regions ... 9 Theme 2: Providing a Secure and Sustainable Livelihood in the Baltic Sea Region – Environment and Energy ......................................................11 Panel Debate Concerning the Combating of Trafficking ......................................................15 Theme 3: Promoting Trade and Investment in the Baltic Sea Region .............................................18 Conclusions: Challenges for Further Development of Regional Cooperation in the Baltic Sea Area .... 22 This document has been performed by Sida’s Baltic Sea Unit, commissioned by the Swedish Prime Minister’s office. The texts have been written by Josefin Dahlander (Sida), Marie Sandberg (The Institute for Local and Regional Democracy, Växjö) and Tor-Björn Åstrand Karlsson (The Institute for Local and Regional Democracy, Växjö). Josefin Dahlander is responsible for the content of the publication. Published by Sida 2006 Baltic Sea Unit Printed by Edita Communication AB, 2006 Articlenumber: SIDA31159en This publication can be downloaded/ordered from www.sida.se/publications Introduction The conference ’Prosperity and sustainability – local cooperation in the Baltic Sea region‘ was arranged by the Swedish Government on the 16–18th of August 2006 in Visby. The Swedish Prime Minister invited leaders of local and regional institutions in Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Russia, Sweden, Iceland, Norway, Ukraine and Belarus to participate in the event. The civil society, business communities and strategic partners at national, international and European levels were also represented among the participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Sustainable Cities in Sweden
    DEVELOPING SUSTAINABLE CITIES IN SWEDEN ABOUT THE BOOKLET This booklet has been developed within the Sida-funded ITP-programme: »Towards Sustainable Development and Local Democracy through the SymbioCity Approach« through the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR ), SKL International and the Swedish International Centre for Democracy (ICLD ). The purpose of the booklet is to introduce the reader to Sweden and Swedish experiences in the field of sustainable urban development, with special emphasis on regional and local government levels. Starting with a brief historical exposition of the development of the Swedish welfare state and introducing democracy and national government in Sweden of today, the main focus of the booklet is on sustainable planning from a local governance perspective. The booklet also presents practical examples and case studies from different municipalities in Sweden. These examples are often unique, and show the broad spectrum of approaches and innovative solutions being applied across the country. EDITORIAL NOTES MANUSCRIPT Gunnar Andersson, Bengt Carlson, Sixten Larsson, Ordbildarna AB GRAPHIC DESIGN AND ILLUSTRATIONS Viera Larsson, Ordbidarna AB ENGLISH EDITING John Roux, Ordbildarna AB EDITORIAL SUPPORT Anki Dellnäs, ICLD, and Paul Dixelius, Klas Groth, Lena Nilsson, SKL International PHOTOS WHEN NOT STATED Gunnar Andersson, Bengt Carlsson, Sixten Larsson, Viera Larsson COVER PHOTOS Anders Berg, Vattenfall image bank, Sixten Larsson, SKL © Copyright for the final product is shared by ICLD and SKL International, 2011 CONTACT INFORMATION ICLD, Visby, Sweden WEBSITE www.icld.se E-MAIL [email protected] PHONE +46 498 29 91 80 SKL International, Stockholm, Sweden WEBSITE www.sklinternational.se E-MAIL [email protected] PHONE +46 8 452 70 00 ISBN 978-91-633-9773-8 CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments by the Government of Sweden Re Opinion No. 54/2015 Reference: G/SO 218/2
    Stockholm UF2014/58264/UD/FMR 4 February 2016 Ministry for Foreign Affairs Mr Seong-Phil Hong Sweden Chair-Rapporteur for the Working Group on Director-General for Legal Affairs Arbitrary Detention Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights United Nations CH-1211 GENEVA 10 Switzerland Comments by the Government of Sweden re Opinion No. 54/2015 Reference: G/SO 218/2 Sir, 1. The Government acknowledges receipt of Opinion No. 54/2015, adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention on 4 December 2015. In accordance with the Methods of work of the Working Group, I have the honour, on behalf of the Swedish Government, to submit the following comments and information in respect of the aforementioned opinion. 2. In its opinion, the Working Group considers that the current situation of Mr. Assange, staying within the confines of the Embassy of the Republic of Ecuador in the United Kingdom, has become a state of an arbitrary deprivation of liberty in contravention of international human rights obligations. 3. To begin with, the Government notes that one of the five members of the Working Group has expressed an individual dissenting opinion, arguing that Mr. Assange fled the bail in June 2012 and since then stays at the premises of the Ecuadorian Embassy using them as a safe haven to evade arrest. According to the dissent, such premises of self-confinement cannot be considered as places of detention for the purposes of the mandate of the Working Group. In addition, it is contended that the Working Group is not competent to consider situations that do not involve deprivation of liberty and that issues related to fugitives’ self-confimement, such as asylum and extradition, do not fall into the mandate of the Working Group (see, for instance, E/CN.4/1999/63, para.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of Sweden
    Source: http://www.isn.ethz.ch (accessed December 2008) The Constitution of the Kingdom of Sweden Table of Content: The Instrument of Government (SFS nr: 1974:152) The Act of Succession (SFS nr: 1810:0926) The Freedom of the Press Act (SFS nr: 1949:105) The Fundamental Law on Freedom of Expression (SFS nr: 1991:1469) The Instrument of Government (SFS nr: 1974:152) Chapter 1. Basic principles of the form of government Art. 1. All public power in Sweden proceeds from the people. Swedish democracy is founded on the free formation of opinion and on universal and equal suf- frage. It shall be realised through a representative and parliamentary polity and through local self- government. Public power shall be exercised under the law. Art. 2. Public power shall be exercised with respect for the equal worth of all and the liberty and dignity of the private person. The personal, economic and cultural welfare of the private person shall be fundamental aims of public activity. In particular, it shall be incumbent upon the public institutions to secure the right to health, employment, housing and education, and to promote social care and social security. The public institutions shall promote sustainable development leading to a good environment for present and future generations. The public institutions shall promote the ideals of democracy as guidelines in all sectors of society and protect the private and family lives of private persons. The public institutions shall promote the opportunity for all to attain participation and equality in society. The public institutions shall com- bat discrimination of persons on grounds of gender, colour, national or ethnic origin, linguistic or religious affiliation, functional disability, sexual orientation, age or other circumstance affecting the private person.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Government Policy, 08 September 2020
    Statement of Government Policy 8 September 2020 In the Statement of Government Policy presented on 21 January 2019, the Government laid out its plans for the entire electoral period. This Statement of Government Policy primarily concerns the 2020/21 Riksdag session. State of Government Policy 2020 Your Majesties, Mr Speaker, Honourable Members of the Riksdag, Sweden is a country to be proud of. We are leading the world in the climate transition. Our country’s natural beauty is extraordinary, our popular movements dynamic and our parental insurance system outstanding. The generations that came before us built a country where everyone is expected to take their share of responsibility for Sweden, but where everyone also has every opportunity to achieve their full potential. We have safety nets and support for people who become unemployed or sick; we have free education and innovative businesses. This is our Sweden, and we should be proud of it. This is our country, and we will make it even better. That is our common task. *** Mr Speaker, The COVID-19 crisis is testing our country. I would like to thank all the parties and members of the Riksdag for their cooperation in these difficult times for Sweden. You have given every person in Sweden reason to be proud of our democracy. COVID-19 will shape our country for a long time to come, and society is equipped to deal with new outbreaks. The Government has decided to take part in the EU’s joint procurement of vaccines. Large-scale testing, physical distancing and contact tracing will continue.
    [Show full text]