'In Me Porto Crucem': a New Light on the Lost St Margaret's Crux Nigra

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

'In Me Porto Crucem': a New Light on the Lost St Margaret's Crux Nigra © The Author(s) 2020. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ‘In me porto crucem’: a new light on the lost St Margaret’s crux nigra Francesco Marzella Abstract St Margaret of Scotland owned a reliquary containing a relic of the True Cross known as crux nigra. Both Turgot, Margaret’s biographer, and Aelred of Rievaulx, who spent some years at the court of Margaret’s son, King David, mention the reliquary without offering sufficient information on its origin. The Black Rood was probably lost or destroyed in the sixteenth century. Some lines written on the margins of a twelfth- century manuscript containing Aelred’s Genealogia regum Anglorum can now shed a new light on this sacred object. The mysterious lines, originally written on the Black Rood or more probably on the casket in which it was contained, claim that the relic once belonged to an Anglo-Saxon king, and at the same time they seem to convey a signifi- cant political message. In his biography of St Margaret of Scotland,1 Turgot († 1115),2 at the time prior of Durham, mentioned an object that was particularly dear to the queen. It was a cross known as crux nigra. In chapter XIII of his Vita sanctae Margaretae, Turgot tells how the queen wanted to see it for the last time when she felt death was imminent: 3 Ipsa quoque illam, quam Nigram Crucem nominare, quamque in maxima semper ven- eratione habere consuevit, sibi afferri præcepit. Sed cum loculus, in quo fuerat inclusa, citius aperiri non posset, regina graviter ingemiscens, ait: ‘O nos miseros! O culpabiles! ulterius sanctæ crucis non merebimur aspectum.’ Quandoque tamen de loculo pro- latam, eique allatam cum reverentia suscepit, complecti, deosculari, oculos, faciem illa significare crebrius studuit. Jamque, frigescente toto corpore, nihilominus tamen ipsa semper orabat; et quinquagesimum Psalmum ex ordine decantans, crucem interim sibi ante oculos statuens, utraque manu tenebat.4 1 On St Margaret of Scotland, see C. Keene, Saint Margaret, Queen of the Scots: a Life in Perspective (New York, 2013). See also R. Rushforth, St Margaret’s Gospel-Book: the Favourite Book of an Eleventh-Century Queen of Scots (Oxford, 2007). 2 On Turgot’s life and career, see e.g. A W. M. Aird, St Cuthbert and the Normans: the Church of Durham 1071–1153 (Woodbridge, 1998), pp. 249–51. 3 Latin text from Symeonis Dunelmensis Opera et Collectanea, ed. J. Hodgson Hinde, Surtees Soc. 51 (Durham, 1868), I, 252–3. 4 ‘Moreover, she asked that a cross, called the Black Cross, which she always held in the greatest veneration, should be brought to her. There was some delay in opening the chest in which it 351 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.219, on 30 Sep 2021 at 11:36:05, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263675119000103 Francesco Marzella Turgot does not tell much about the relic and the reliquary. For example, he does not explain why it was called nigra crux, even though we can easily suppose it was due to the dark colour of its wood. What we learn from Turgot is that Margaret had a great devotion towards it – as demonstrated by her final will to see and touch the relic before dying, as an extreme act of veneration for the cross – and that the cross was kept in a loculus,5 a casket, that could be opened to extract the relic and venerate it. It is worth mentioning that in the abridg- ment of the Life of St Margaret in John of Tynemouth’s Sanctilogium Angliae, Walliae, Scotiae et Hiberniae (also known as Nova legenda Anglie)6 the reliquary is called Crucem Scotie nigram,7 the Black Rood of Scotland, and this suggests that the personal devotion of the saintly queen for this relic, as much prestigious as mysterious, was at some point so widely spread that the relic itself became a national symbol. Nevertheless, although stressing the importance of this holy object, Turgot – who being the chaplain of Queen Margaret surely had the chance to see the reliquary – does not add any information about its aspect and, most of all, its provenance and origin. A later text offers us more details. In the part of the Genealogia Regum Anglorum devoted to the pious life of Margaret’s son, David of Scotland, now known as De uita David regis,8 in paragraph X, Aelred tells how David imitated his mother when he was about to die. As the queen did, when his sickness got worse David wanted to be brought to the oratory to attend his last mass, and then asked to see the reliquary. This is how Aelred described the sacred object: 9 Igitur clericorum atque militum manibus in oratorium deportatus, post missarum sol- lemnia, uenerandam sibi crucem, quam nigram uocant, produci sibi petiit adorandam. Est autem crux illa longitudinem habens palme de auro purissimo mirabili opere fabri- cata, que in modum thece clauditur et aperitur. Cernitur in ea quedam dominice crucis was kept, during which the queen, sighing deeply, exclaimed, “O unhappy that we are! O guilty that we are! Shall we not be permitted once more to look upon the Holy Cross!” When at last it was got out of the chest and brought to her, she received it with reverence, and did her best to embrace it and kiss it, and several times she signed herself with it. Although every part of her body was now growing cold, still as long as the warmth of life throbbed at her heart she continued steadfast in prayer. She repeated the whole of the Fiftieth Psalm, and placing the cross before her eyes, she held it there with both her hands.’ See W. Forbes-Leith, The Life of St Margaret, Queen of Scotland by Turgot, Bishop of St Andrews (Dunfermline, 1980), p. 25. 5 The same word is used in the Itinerarium Egeriae (37, 1) to describe the casket containing the lignum crucis: ‘affertur loculus argenteus deauratus, in quo est lignum sanctum crucis, aperitur et profertur, ponitur in mensa tam lignum crucis quam titulus’. 6 See Nova Legenda Anglie: as collected by John of Tynemouth, John Capgrave, and others, ed. C. Horstman (Oxford, 1901), vol. 2, p. 174. 7 See also the apparatus of Hinde’s edition on p. 252. 8 See Aelredi Rievallensis Opera hagiographica et historica, ed. D. Pezzini, CCCM 3 (Turnhout, 2017), 78*–91*. 9 Latin text ibid. pp. 16–17. 352 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.219, on 30 Sep 2021 at 11:36:05, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263675119000103 ‘In me porto crucem’: a new light on the lost St Margaret’s crux nigra portio, sicut sepe multorum miraculorum argumento probatum est, Saluatoris nostri imaginem habens de ebore decentissime sculptam, et aureis distinctionibus mirabiliter decoratam. Hanc religiosa regina Margareta, huius regis mater, que de semine regio Anglorum et Hungariorum extitit oriunda, allatam in Scotiam, quasi munus heredi- tarium transmisit ad filios. Hanc igitur crucem, omni Scotorum genti non minus terri- bilem quam amabilem, cum rex deuotissime adorasset, cum multis lacrimis peccatorum confessionum premissa, exitum suum celestium mysteriorum perceptione muniuit.10 Aelred makes a distinction between the golden cross, the uenerandam crucem etc., and the relic in it. Strictly speaking, in this passage the name nigra crux seems to apply to the cross-shaped reliquary only – uenerandam (...) crucem (...) est autem crux illa (...) cernitur in ea all grammatically refer to the first cross, called nigra, namely the reliquary – but Aelred here is quite ambiguous and it seems more than plausible that the name designates the whole object (the reliquary and relic kept inside). After all, the firstueneranda crux is golden, so why should it be called nigra? We can suppose the name initially designated the relic and then also the reliquary contain- ing it.11 Nevertheless, there is much we learn from Aelred’s description. Dimensions. The reliquary was the length of a palm, that means approximately 7.5 cm.12 A small measure, much smaller than that of comparable examples coming from Britain, like the Anglo-Saxon reliquary cross kept in the Victoria and Albert Museum (height: 18.5 cm) or the Brussels cross (46.5 cm) attributed to a certain Drahmal. Too small to be a processional cross, it was not even a hanging cross: both Turgot and Aelred suggest that the precious object was occasionally held in its owner’s hands to be venerated. 10 ‘He was therefore carried to the oratory on the hands of the clerics and soldiers, and after the solemnity of the mass he asked that the venerable cross that people call “black” be brought for him to adore. This cross, the length of the palm of the hand, was made with surpassing skill out of pure gold; it opens and closes like a box. In it can be seen a portion of the Lord’s cross, as has been often proved by the evidence of the many miracles. It bears the image of our Saviour carved from the most beautiful ivory and is marvellously adorned with golden ornaments. The devout Queen Margaret, the king’s mother, who sprang from the royal seed of the English and Hungarians, passed on to her sons as a hereditary gift this cross that she had brought to Scotland.
Recommended publications
  • A Rough Sketch of the History of Stained Glass
    MEDIAEVAL STAINED GLASS FROM HOLYROOD ABBEY CHURCH. 81 IV. MEDIAEVAL STAINED GLASS RECENTLY RECOVERED PROE MTH . RUIN F HOLYROOO S D ABBE Y. EELESC CHURCH . P , Y B . P.S.A. SCOT. The fragment f mediaevao s l stained glass e describeaboub o t t d were found on the top of the vaulting of the south aisle of the nave of Holyrood Abbey Church during repairs to the roof in 1909. They have since been ^carefully cleaned and set up to form part of a window e picturth f o e e eas d galleryth en t t a . Their discover f first-claso s yi s importanc o Scottist e h ecclesiastical archaeology, because [hardly yan stained glas s surviveha s d from mediaeval Scotland. ROUGA H SKETCHISTORE TH F STAINEHF O Y O D GLASS. Before describing the Holyrood glass in detail, it will perhaps be n over ru s wel a ,o t lver y briefly e historth , d developmenan y f o t mediaeval stained glass, as a glance at the main points may make t easiei realiso t r exace eth t positio relatiod nan e newl th f no y recovered Holyrood fragments. The ornamentatio f glasno s vessel meany b s f colouso s practisewa r d e Romanbyth s wel a ss othea l r ancient e decorationationsth d an , n oa largf e surfac meany eb numbea f o s f pieceo r f coloureso d glasr o s glazed material carefully fitted together was also well known, but the principlt applieno s windowso dt wa e , althoug e glazinhth f windowgo s with plain glas s knowe Romansth wa s o nt r windofo , w glas founs i s d in almost every Roman fort.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Doamients Downloaded from Burgundian Notes
    310 April Notes and Doamients Downloaded from Burgundian Notes I. THE ALPINE SON-HST-LAW OF EDWARD THE ELDER1 THE continental marriages of the daughters of Edward the http://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/ Elder present difficulties which have not yet been satisfactorily explained. The earliest author who mentions more than one is Ethelwerd, who wrote in the last quarter of the tenth century and who claimed to be descended from the West Saxon royal line. The preface to his Chronicle is addressed to a certain Matilda, to whom he writes as his kinswoman. She cannot, therefore, be the abbess of Quedlinburg to whom Widukind dedicated his Saxon at UQ Library on July 15, 2015 history, for she was the daughter of Otto the Great by his second marriage with Adelaide the Burgundian. The lady addressed was probably Matilda, abbess of Essen, daughter of Liudolf, Otto's son by his first marriage with Edith.2 Ethelwerd brings together a string of facts relating to the foreign alliances of various members of the English reigning house. He begins with the marriage of Alfred's daughter ^Elfthrythe to Baldwin of Flanders. Then he mentions the daughters of Edward the Elder : first, Eadgyfu married to Charles the Simple ; secondly, Eadhild, wife to Hugh, son of Robert, the great duke. Next he says, Alias veroduas Aedestanus rex tali ratione inisit ad Oddonem, ut quae ab eis placuisset, sibi in matrimonium elegisset; cui visa est melior Eadgyde, ex qua tu principium tenes nativitatis ; alteram vero subiunxit cuidain regi iuxta Iupitereos montes, de cuius prole nulla nbbis notitia extet, tarn pro 1 I am greatly indebted to my friend the Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorials of Old Dorset
    :<X> CM \CO = (7> ICO = C0 = 00 [>• CO " I Hfek^M, Memorials of the Counties of England General Editor : Rev. P. H. Ditchfield, M.A., F.S.A. Memorials of Old Dorset ?45H xr» MEMORIALS OF OLD DORSET EDITED BY THOMAS PERKINS, M.A. Late Rector of Turnworth, Dorset Author of " Wimborne Minster and Christchurch Priory" ' " Bath and Malmesbury Abbeys" Romsey Abbey" b*c. AND HERBERT PENTIN, M.A. Vicar of Milton Abbey, Dorset Vice-President, Hon. Secretary, and Editor of the Dorset Natural History and Antiquarian Field Club With many Illustrations LONDON BEMROSE & SONS LIMITED, 4 SNOW HILL, E.C. AND DERBY 1907 [All Rights Reserved] TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE LORD EUSTACE CECIL, F.R.G.S. PAST PRESIDENT OF THE DORSET NATURAL HISTORY AND ANTIQUARIAN FIELD CLUB THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED BY HIS LORDSHIP'S KIND PERMISSION PREFACE editing of this Dorset volume was originally- THEundertaken by the Rev. Thomas Perkins, the scholarly Rector of Turnworth. But he, having formulated its plan and written four papers therefor, besides gathering material for most of the other chapters, was laid aside by a very painful illness, which culminated in his unexpected death. This is a great loss to his many friends, to the present volume, and to the county of for Mr. Perkins knew the as Dorset as a whole ; county few men know it, his literary ability was of no mean order, and his kindness to all with whom he was brought in contact was proverbial. After the death of Mr. Perkins, the editing of the work was entrusted to the Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Edward the Martyr Catholic.Net
    St. Edward the Martyr Catholic.net Edward the Martyr (Old English: Eadweard; c. 962 – 18 March 978) was King of England from 975 until he was murdered in 978. Edward was the eldest son of King Edgar the Peaceful but was not his father's acknowledged heir. On Edgar's death, the leadership of England was contested, with some supporting Edward's claim to be king and others supporting his much younger half-brother Æthelred the Unready, recognized as a legitimate son of Edgar. Edward was chosen as king and was crowned by his main clerical supporters, the archbishops Dunstan and Oswald of Worcester. The great nobles of the kingdom, ealdormen Ælfhere and Æthelwine, quarrelled, and civil war almost broke out. In the so-called anti-monastic reaction, the nobles took advantage of Edward's weakness to dispossess the Benedictine reformed monasteries of lands and other properties that King Edgar had granted to them. Edward's short reign was brought to an end by his murder at Corfe Castle in 978 in circumstances that are not altogether clear. His body was reburied with great ceremony at Shaftesbury Abbey early in 979. In 1001 Edward's remains were moved to a more prominent place in the abbey, probably with the blessing of his half-brother King Æthelred. Edward was already reckoned a saint by this time. A number of lives of Edward were written in the centuries following his death in which he was portrayed as a martyr, generally seen as a victim of the Queen Dowager Ælfthryth, mother of Æthelred.
    [Show full text]
  • Thevikingblitzkriegad789-1098.Pdf
    2 In memory of Jeffrey Martin Whittock (1927–2013), much-loved and respected father and papa. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A number of people provided valuable advice which assisted in the preparation of this book; without them, of course, carrying any responsibility for the interpretations offered by the book. We are particularly indebted to our agent Robert Dudley who, as always, offered guidance and support, as did Simon Hamlet and Mark Beynon at The History Press. In addition, Bradford-on-Avon library, and the Wiltshire and the Somerset Library services, provided access to resources through the inter-library loans service. For their help and for this service we are very grateful. Through Hannah’s undergraduate BA studies and then MPhil studies in the department of Anglo-Saxon, Norse and Celtic (ASNC) at Cambridge University (2008–12), the invaluable input of many brilliant academics has shaped our understanding of this exciting and complex period of history, and its challenging sources of evidence. The resulting familiarity with Old English, Old Norse and Insular Latin has greatly assisted in critical reflection on the written sources. As always, the support and interest provided by close family and friends cannot be measured but is much appreciated. And they have been patient as meal-time conversations have given way to discussions of the achievements of Alfred and Athelstan, the impact of Eric Bloodaxe and the agendas of the compilers of the 4 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. 5 CONTENTS Title Dedication Acknowledgements Introduction 1 The Gathering
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Nationalism
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Summer 2012 Scottish nationalism: The symbols of Scottish distinctiveness and the 700 Year continuum of the Scots' desire for self determination Brian Duncan James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Duncan, Brian, "Scottish nationalism: The symbols of Scottish distinctiveness and the 700 Year continuum of the Scots' desire for self determination" (2012). Masters Theses. 192. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/192 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Scottish Nationalism: The Symbols of Scottish Distinctiveness and the 700 Year Continuum of the Scots’ Desire for Self Determination Brian Duncan A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts History August 2012 Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………….…….iii Chapter 1, Introduction……………………………………………………………………1 Chapter 2, Theoretical Discussion of Nationalism………………………………………11 Chapter 3, Early Examples of Scottish Nationalism……………………………………..22 Chapter 4, Post-Medieval Examples of Scottish Nationalism…………………………...44 Chapter 5, Scottish Nationalism Masked Under Economic Prosperity and British Nationalism…...………………………………………………….………….…………...68 Chapter 6, Conclusion……………………………………………………………………81 ii Abstract With the modern events concerning nationalism in Scotland, it is worth asking how Scottish nationalism was formed. Many proponents of the leading Modernist theory of nationalism would suggest that nationalism could not have existed before the late eighteenth century, or without the rise of modern phenomena like industrialization and globalization.
    [Show full text]
  • Holyrood Abbey Statement of Significance
    Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC223 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM13031) Taken into State care: 1906 (Ownership) Last reviewed: 2014 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE HOLYROOD ABBEY We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH © Historic Environment Scotland 2019 You may re-use this information (excluding logos and images) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit http://nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this document should be sent to us at: Historic Environment Scotland Longmore House Salisbury Place Edinburgh EH9 1SH +44 (0) 131 668 8600 www.historicenvironment.scot You can download this publication from our website at www.historicenvironment.scot Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH HOLYROOD ABBEY SYNOPSIS The Augustinian Abbey of Holyrood was founded by David I in 1128 as a daughter-house of Merton Priory (Surrey). By the 15th century the abbey was increasingly being used as a royal residence – James II was born there in 1430 - and by the time of the Protestant Reformation (1560) much of the monastic precinct had been subsumed into the embryonic Palace of Holyroodhouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish News Page 2
    Anglican Catholic Church of St Augustine Eastling Road, Painters Forstal, Kent ME13 0DU P ARISH N EWS Sunday: 11 am Sung Mass (1st Sunday: Healing Service) Holy Days: As Announced A Very Warm Today, in our Mask Wearing & Social Distancing Apply Kalendar, in addi- WELCOME tion to celebrating the Third Sunday This Sunday is after Trinity, we commemorate the Translation of the Relics of St Trinity III (Comm: Edward. King and Martyr. But what do we Translation of St Edward) mean by this? 20th June 2021 The translation of relics is the removal of holy objects associated with a The Propers of the Saint (or perhaps the Saint’s remains themselves) from one locality to another Mass begin on (usually a higher-status location); usually Page 587 of the red only the movement of the remains of the Book of Common Prayer saint's body would be treated so formally, with secondary relics such as and Page C59 of the items of clothing, treated with less Anglican Missal ceremony. Translations could be accompanied by many acts, including all-night vigils and processions, often involving entire communities. Often in the early Middle Ages However, Edward's short reign was solemn translation marked the moment at brought to an end by his murder at Corfe which, the saint's miracles having been Castle. Initially buried there, St Edwards recognized, the relic was moved by a relics were translated first on 13th bishop or abbot to a prominent position February 981 to the great Abbey in within the church. Local veneration was Shaftesbury.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward the Martyr
    Edward the Martyr From OrthodoxWiki The holy and right-believing King Edward the Martyr (c. 962 – March 18, 978/979) succeeded his father Edgar of England as King of England in 975, but was murdered after a reign of only a few years. As the murder was attributed to "irreligious" opponents, whereas Edward himself was considered a good Christian, he was glorified as Saint Edward the Martyr in 1001; he may also be considered a passion-bearer. His feast day is celebrated on March 18, the uncovering of his relics is commemorated on February 13, and the elevation of his relics on June 20. The translation of his relics is commemorated on September 3. St. Edward the Martyr Contents 1 Motive and details of his murder 2 History of his relics 3 See also 4 Source 5 External links Motive and details of his murder Edward's accession to the throne was contested by a party headed by his stepmother, Queen Elfrida, who wished her son, Ethelred the Unready, to become king instead. However, Edward's claim had more support—including that of St. Dunstan, Archbishop of Canterbury—and was confirmed by the Witan. King Edward "was a young man of great devotion and excellent conduct. He was completely Orthodox, good and of holy life. Moreover, he loved God and the Church above all things. He was generous to the poor, a haven to the good, a champion of the Faith of Christ, a vessel full of every virtuous grace." On King Edward's accession to the throne a great famine was raging through the land and violent attacks were stirred up against monasteries by prominent noblemen who coveted the lands that his father King Edgar had endowed to them.
    [Show full text]
  • 162912442.Pdf
    Emily Mitchell Patronage and Politics at Barking Abbey, c. 950 - c. 1200 Abstract This thesis is a study of the Benedictine abbey of Barking in Essex from the tenth to the twelfth centuries. It is based on a wide range of published and unpublished documentary sources, and on hagiographie texts written at the abbey. It juxtaposes the literary and documentary sources in a new way to show that both are essential for a full understanding of events, and neither can be fully appreciated in isolation. It also deliberately crosses the political boundary of 1066, with the intention of demonstrating that political events were not the most significant determinant of the recipients of benefactors’ religious patronage. It also uses the longer chronological scale to show that patterns of patronage from the Anglo-Saxon era were frequently inherited by the incoming Normans along with their landholdings. Through a detailed discussion of two sets of unpublished charters (Essex Record Office MSS D/DP/Tl and Hatfield, Hatfield House MS Ilford Hospital 1/6) 1 offer new dates and interpretations of several events in the abbey’s history, and identify the abbey’s benefactors from the late tenth century to 1200. As Part III shows, it has been possible to trace patterns of patronage which were passed down through several generations, crossing the political divide of 1066. Royal patronage is shown to have been of great significance to the abbey, and successive kings exploited their power of advowson in different ways according to the political atmosphere o f England. The literary sources are discussed in a separate section, but with full reference to the historical narrative.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland's Royal Palace
    Scotland’s royal palace Holyroodhouse, Edinburgh The Scottish Palace of The Queen The surviving interiors of Scotland’s premier royal palace offer a vivid insight into the 17th-century life of the Court. Simon Thurley unravels the history of an outstanding building Photographs by James Brittain f all The Queen’s palaces, that of Holyroodhouse can claim, with Windsor, to be the most venerable. It has its origins in an Augustin- Oian abbey founded in 1128 and is named after its most precious relic—a fragment of the true cross, a piece of the holy rood. Like their English counterparts, medieval Scot- tish kings often preferred to reside in the comfortable lodgings of a rich abbot rather than the austere towers of their own fortresses. More than Edinburgh Castle, Holyrood became a favoured residence of the Scottish kings, and by the reign of James V, the royal lodgings at the abbey overshadowed the monastic parts (Fig 2). Most impressive of the surviving remains from this early palace are the rooms of Mary Queen of Scots (Country Life, November 23, 1995). Like most royal palaces, Holyroodhouse was horribly abused during the Civil War and Commonwealth, and, at the Restoration, it was very run down. The Scottish Privy Council had a scheme for smartening it up in 1661, but, in 1670, it was decided to almost completely rebuild it. What was constructed between 1671 and 1679 was no normal palace. At the time, it seemed very unlikely that Charles II would ever visit Edinburgh, let The Royal Collection alone live there. The royal apartments were ➢ Fig 1: The King’s Bedchamber with its 1680s state bed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lives of the British Saints
    LIVES OF THE BRITISH SAINTS Vladimir Moss Copyright: Vladimir Moss, 2009 1. SAINTS ACCA AND ALCMUND, BISHOPS OF HEXHAM ......................5 2. SAINT ADRIAN, ABBOT OF CANTERBURY...............................................8 3. SAINT ADRIAN, HIEROMARTYR BISHOP OF MAY and those with him ....................................................................................................................................9 4. SAINT AIDAN, BISHOP OF LINDISFARNE...............................................11 5. SAINT ALBAN, PROTOMARTYR OF BRITAIN.........................................16 6. SAINT ALCMUND, MARTYR-KING OF NORTHUMBRIA ....................20 7. SAINT ALDHELM, BISHOP OF SHERBORNE...........................................21 8. SAINT ALFRED, MARTYR-PRINCE OF ENGLAND ................................27 9. SAINT ALPHEGE, HIEROMARTYR ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY ..................................................................................................................................30 10. SAINT ALPHEGE “THE BALD”, BISHOP OF WINCHESTER...............41 11. SAINT ASAPH, BISHOP OF ST. ASAPH’S ................................................42 12. SAINTS AUGUSTINE, LAURENCE, MELLITUS, JUSTUS, HONORIUS AND DEUSDEDIT, ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY ..............................43 13. SAINTS BALDRED AND BALDRED, MONKS OF BASS ROCK ...........54 14. SAINT BATHILD, QUEEN OF FRANCE....................................................55 15. SAINT BEDE “THE VENERABLE” OF JARROW .....................................57 16. SAINT BENIGNUS (BEONNA)
    [Show full text]