Existing Conditions Analysis for Redlands Transit Villages Specific Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Existing Conditions Analysis for Redlands Transit Villages Specific Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS FOR REDLANDS TRANSIT VILLAGES SPECIFIC PLAN PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF REDLANDS 26 NOVEMBER 2018 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Regional Location. Redlands is located at the base of the San Bernardino 2. Redlands Passenger Rail Project. Metrolink commuter rail service Mountains in San Bernardino County, 60 miles northeast of Los Angeles currently links San Bernardino to Downtown Los Angeles. Work is and 45 miles west of Palm Springs. Redlands is a mid-sized city with a currently underway to introduce rail transit between Redlands and the population of 68,049 in 2016. Figure I-1 shows the location of Redlands San Bernardino Transit Center in the form of the Redlands Passenger in its regional context. Redlands is situated along the Interstate Rail project. The nine-mile route will use the former Atchison, Topeka 10 (I-10) freeway corridor, which links the city with the cities of San and Santa Fe Railway line. While mostly single-track, two miles of Bernardino, Ontario, and Los Angeles to the west and Palm Springs doubletrack will be constructed in the middle to allow vehicles to pass to the east. Interstate 210 (I-210), or thePalmdale Foothill Freeway, originates each other. There will initially be three stations in Redlands—New York in Redlands, traverses the northwest part of the city, and heads west StreetVictorville near ESRI, Downtown247 Redlands, and University Street near the 138 18 Figure 1-1: Regional Setting towards Pasadena. 395 University of Redlands—with stations at Alabama and California Streets 5 18 14 to15 be constructed in later phases. Santa Clarita 138 247 San A n geles National F o r est Fernando 110 210 5 405 18 Big Bear Burbank 215 S an B ernadino National F o r est 101 15 38 Glendale Pasadena Arcadia 210 Joshua 62 San Tree 210 Rialto 110 605 Rancho Bernardino Yucca Cucamonga 66 Alhambra Baldwin Clairmont Fontana Valley El Monte Covina Beverly 101 Park 62 10 Hills Los Angeles Monterey West Pomona Ontario Park Covina 1 Yucaipa 10 60 215 Redlands Culver Montebello City 60 Chino Joshua T r e e Santa Jurupa Monica 110 71 10 National 405 5 Whittier Valley Cherry P ark South Riverside Valley Inglewood Gate 57 Downey 60 Beaumont Banning El Segundo 105 91 Moreno 1 Hawthorne Valley Manhattan Compton 710 Norwalk Yorba Beach Linda Fullerton Placentia Corona 111 Cerritos 79 Torrance Anaheim 605 15 Carson 58 241 215 243 Palm 405 Springs Perris San 10 Orange Jacinto Cathedral Long City Rancho Beach 22 Rancho Palos Verde Santa Clev eland 74 S anta R osa Ana Hemet 74 Mirage National and Palm Indio 405 Desert 1 58 Winchester 5 F o r est Menifee S an Jacinto Irvine Huntington 241 Lake M ountain s 79 Beach Lake Elsinore Forest National 133 Newport 73 Beach Monument 74 1 74 Murrieta Laguna Beach Laguna Niguel Temecula 371 Dana 79 Figure I-1. Regional Location. Point San Clemente 15 C lev eland National REDLANDS TRANSIT VILLAGES SPECIFIC PLAN I. INTRODUCTION 1 F o r est Existing Conditions Analysis 0 10 20 40 5 76 1-4 MILES INTRODUCTION 3. The Specific Plan Area. The Specific Plan applies to parcels located by Judson Street; and to the south by Citrus Avenue, Central Avenue, within approximately one-half mile, or a 10-minute walk, of the New York Redlands Boulevard, Olive Avenue, Brookside Avenue, Ash Street, Pine Street, Downtown Redlands, and University Street. Arrow passenger rail Avenue, Tennessee Street, and State Street. The Specific Plan area also stations. The Specific Plan area is generally bounded to the west by includes the parcels along both sides of Orange Street between Colton Kansas Street, Redlands Boulevard, and Alabama Street; to the north Avenue and Lugonia Avenue. by the I-10 Freeway Colton Avenue, and Sylvan Boulevard; to the east Lugonia Ave Brockton Ave. 10 Minute Walk Church St. Route 10 St. New York University St. Texas St. Texas Alabama St. 1/2 Mile University of Redlands Redlands Blvd. Colton Ave. Route 10 Judson St. 1/4 Mile Eureka St. Citrus Ave.Orange St. Kansas St. 5 Minute Walk New York Avenue Station Downtown University Street Central Ave. Route 10 Redlands Blvd. Station Station San Gorgonio Dr. State St. Esri Michigan Downtown Citrus Ave. State St. Tennessee St. Tennessee Redlands Blvd Pine Ave. Brookside Ave. Cajon St. Ash St. Olive Ave. Cypress Ave. Specific Plan Boundary Arrow Passenger Rail Figure I-2. Specific Plan Area. REDLANDS TRANSIT VILLAGES SPECIFIC PLAN Existing Conditions Analysis 2 INTRODUCTION 4. Specific Plan Transit Villages. The Specific Plan area is divided into three Avenue. The University Village is located east of Church Street and west Transit Villages: New York Street, Downtown, and University Street. The of Judson Street. Each of these villages has its own unique character, New York Street Village is located generally west of Texas Street and and the proposed Specific Plan will provide land use, development, and Center Street. The Downtown Village is generally bounded to the east by public realm standards that ensure each transit village develops accord- Church Street, and to the west by Texas Street, and includes the parcels ing to (or establishes) its unique character. Land uses – particularly along both sides of Orange Street between Colton Avenue and Lugonia retail – should not compete with those of the other villages. Lugonia Ave Brockton Ave. 10 Minute Walk Church St. Route 10 St. New York University St. Texas St. Texas Alabama St. 1/2 Mile University of Redlands Redlands Blvd. Colton Ave. Route 10 Judson St. 1/4 Mile Eureka St. Orange St. Kansas St. 5 Minute Walk New York Avenue Station Downtown University Street Route 10 Redlands Blvd. Station Station San Gorgonio Dr. State St. Esri Michigan Downtown Citrus Ave. State St. Citrus Ave. Tennessee St. Tennessee Redlands Blvd Pine Ave. Brookside Ave. Cajon St. Ash St. Olive Ave. Cypress Ave. Specific Plan Boundary New York Street Transit Village Arrow Passenger Rail Downtown Transit Village University Street Transit Village Figure I-3. Specific Plan Transit Villages. REDLANDS TRANSIT VILLAGES SPECIFIC PLAN INTRODUCTION 3 Existing Conditions Analysis II. EXISTING URBAN STRUCTURE 1. New York Street Transit Village. Currently the New York Street Transit to the southeast (across the intersection) from the proposed station is Village area is generally car-oriented. Blocks are large and commercial Jennie Davis Park, a 5.2 acre neighborhood park with picnic and play- buildings tend to be placed back from the street behind parking lots or ground facilities. Development to the west of the Esri campus, south landscaped front yards. The 10 and 210 freeway interchange occurs of Redlands Boulevard and the railroad right-of-way, consists primarily above the northwest portion of the Transit Village. Freeway access is of large footprint, light industrial and warehouse buildings. North of provided at Alabama Street and Tennessee Street. Alabama Street, Redlands Boulevard and the railroad tracks, and west of Tennessee Tennessee Street, and Texas Street pass beneath the freeway, connecting Street, are car-oriented shopping centers and fast-food restaurants. the station areas to the neighborhoods north of the freeway, although North of the proposed station and east of Tennessee Street are an the passages are uninviting to pedestrians due to poor lighting and the assorted mix of uses, including Redlands Ford, the Redlands Elks Lodge, sidewalk's adjacency to fast-moving vehicular traffic. The Transit Village the Ayres Hotel, and a Motel 6. North of the freeway are Toyota of is traversed east-west by the railroad tracks, which run along the north Redlands, Empire Bowl, Quality Inn, Hertz, the Salvation Army Store, side of Redlands Boulevard, until New York Street, where they branch and single-family houses. Other buildings and points of interest include off from one another as they proceed eastward. The Mill Creek Zanja Orangewood High School and the Redlands Police Department. The also traverses east-west through the New York Street Village as an open parcels surrounding the proposed New York Street station are largely channel. vacant and underutilized. The New York Street station will be located along the north side of 2. Downtown Transit Village. The Downtown Transit Village contains the Redlands Boulevard at New York Street. To the south of the proposed Downtown core and the historic Santa Fe Depot. Blocks located east station site is Esri's world headquarters, a beautifully landscaped office of Orange Street, including within Downtown and north of the I-10 free- campus within easy walking distance of the proposed station. Located way, tend to be small and conducive to walkability, while those located New York Street looking north towards station site. Historic buildings along Orange Street. The Redlands Campus. REDLANDS TRANSIT VILLAGES SPECIFIC PLAN Existing Conditions Analysis 4 II. EXISTING URBAN STRUCTURE west of Orange Street are larger. Freeway access is via the 6th Street 3. University Street Transit Village. The University Village includes the and Orange/Eureka Street offramps. Streets that pass under the free- portion of the University of Redlands campus located south of the Mill way include Texas Street, Eureka Street, Orange Street, 6th Street, and Creek Zanja and Sylvan Boulevard, and Sylvan Park, a community park Church Street; these passages are not conducive to pedestrians due to that provides more than 18 acres of public recreational and open space. poor lighting and the adjacency of the sidewalk to fast-moving vehicular traffic. Blocks within the University Street Transit Village, especially near the proposed station site, are large. Freeway access is via University Street The Mill Creek Zanja enters the Downtown Transit Village from the east and Cypress Avenue. Church Street, University Street, and Citrus Street as an open trench to 9th Street, where it enters a pipe that passes under- pass beneath the freeway and, like the other freeway underpasses, are ground through the majority of the Downtown Village.
Recommended publications
  • REDLANDS PASSENGER RAIL PROJECT (ARROW) Plan. Build
    REDLANDS PASSENGER RAIL PROJECT (ARROW) Arrow connects to • Mountain Transit San Bernardino – 210 • Omnitrans to CSUSB to Downtown Station • Pass Transit • Victor Valley Transit Overview San Bernardino Santa Fe Depot The Redlands Passenger Rail Project is an innovative nine-mile regional Tippecanoe Metrolink connects to Station N • Los Angeles INTERSTATE rail project that provides additional transportation choices through the CALIFORNIA • Orange County 10 University introduction of a new rail service, known as the Arrow, which integrates • San Diego Station • Riverside INTERSTATE • Ventura CALIFORNIA conveniently with other modes of transportation such as auto, bus and 215 Esri to Loma Linda University Station bicycle. Medical Center Redlands – N Downtown Station The Arrow will connect San Bernardino and Redlands and will offer residents, businesses and visitors a new commuting option to travel to a variety of leisure, education, healthcare and other destinations. Diesel Multiple Units (DMUs) have been identified as the preferred vehicle to provide primary service for the project. The DMUs are powered by an on-board low-emission, Clean Diesel engine which are smaller, quieter, more Funding efficient, and cheaper to operate than standard locomotive haul coaches, similar to Metrolink. DMUs work interoperably on the same track as Metrolink FEDERAL $86.0 Million and freight train services which allows for all three train services to use the STATE $164.6 Million same track in the existing corridor. LOCAL $109.1 Million (Includes Measure I) In addition to local commuter service, a Metrolink locomotive hauled coach train will also provide round trip express service from Redlands-to-Los TOTAL $359.7 Million Angeles each morning with return trip from Los Angeles-to-Redlands each evening.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Electric Trail
    Pacific Electric Trail Fontana, Seven Year Budget California 2009/2010 A City of Action 2015/2016 ABOUT THE COVER For the City of Fontana’s Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Adopted Capital Improvement Program, a cover highlighting “the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail” is featured. The Pacific Electric Trail (PE Trail) is proposed as a 20 mile, regional, multi-purpose trail extending from Claremont, through Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana, and Rialto. The trail was adopted by all the cities it traverses to promote non-motorized travel and other clean air programs. The Master Plan has been completed, and the individual cities have been implementing their respective portions of the PE Trail. Approximately 6.5 miles of the PE Trail traverses through Fontana. As shown on the map below, the City has divided the PE Trail Segment 5B 6.5 miles of PE Trail into six major segments. The existing abandoned railroad right-of-way, on which the PE Trail is located, is 80 feet wide and is consistent throughout each segment. The southerly 35 feet is dedicated to the multi-purpose trail which will consist of a 15 foot wide concrete paved walking/jogging/bike path and landscaping. The northerly 45 feet of that right-of-way is reserved for future rail considerations however, the area may also be landscaped. Four years ago Segment 1 of the PE Trail, a .75 mile segment through the downtown and Civic Center area, was completed. Segment 5A, a .43 mile segment in the Village of Heritage, was completed shortly thereafter. In January 2009 Segment 2, approximately .94 of a mile running from Juniper Ave to Tokay Ave, was completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Rail to Redlands
    Getting Rail to Redlands Carrie Schindler Rob Klovsky SBCTA, Director of Transit & Rail HDR, So. Cal. Transit Director ctaSan Bernardino, CA Irvine, CA San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Video cta cta cta Stage 1 Consolidating Train Storage cta Goals/Scope Expand from 5 to 12 train cap. cta cta Goals/Scope of Facility: • Connect Omnitrans sbX, Fixed Bus Routs, Metrolink and Future Arrow DMU Service • 22 fixed route bus bays • 8,000 SF Transit Center • LEED “Gold” Facility • Dedicated 60,000 SF of TOD/Mixed Use Stage 2 San Bernardino Transit Center cta cta Goals/Scope: • Extend Metrolink terminus to SBTC • Convert Depot to run-through station • Eliminate Puzzle-Switch • Grade Separate Pedestrians at Station • Construct Rail Station Platforms at SBTC • Project Cost: $125M Stage 3 DSBPRP Extension to SBTC cta cta cta cta Celebrating our Successes! cta Stage 4 Redlands Passenger Rail Project cta Strategic Plan RPRP – Phase 1 cta Strategic Plan RPRP – Phase 2 cta Positive Train System Quiet Zones Control Interoperability Project Elements cta Schedule cta General Plan Transit Villages cta New York Street Station cta New York Street Station cta Downtown Redlands Station cta Downtown Redlands Station cta Grant Recipient A modern rail service brought to you by the Redlands Passenger Rail Project First of its kind in San Bernardino County …from DMU to ZEMU First of its kind in North America TIRCP Grant Recipient cta Plan. Build. Move. www.goSBCTA.com 909.884.8276 @goSBCTA.
    [Show full text]
  • 1981 Caltrans Inventory of Pacific Electric Routes
    1981 Inventory of PACIFIC ELECTRIC ROUTES I J..,. I ~ " HE 5428 . red by I58 ANGELES - DISTRICT 7 - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BRANCH rI P37 c.2 " ' archive 1981 INVENTORY OF PACIFIC ELECTRIC ROUTES • PREPARED BY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) DISTRICT 07 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BRANCH FEBRUARY 1982 • TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Pacific Electric Railway Company Map 3a Inventory Map 3b II. NQR'I'HIRN AND EASTERN DISTRICTS 4 A. San Bernardino Line 6 B. Monrovia-Glendora Line 14 C. Alhambra-San Gabriel Line 19 D. Pasadena Short Line 21 E. Pasadena Oak Knoll Line 23 F. Sierra Madre Line 25 G. South Pasadena Line 27 H. North Lake Avenue Line 30 10 North Fair Oaks Avenue Line 31 J. East Colorado Street Line 32 K. Pomona-Upland Line 34 L. San Bernardino-Riverside Line 36 M. Riverside-Corona Line 41 III. WESTERN DISTRICT 45 A. Glendale-Burbank Line 47 B. Hollywood Line Segment via Hill Street 52 C. South Hollywood-Sherman Line 55 D. Subway Hollywood Line 58 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Contd. ) -PAGE III. WESTERN DISTRICT (Conta. ) E. San Fernando valley Line 61 F. Hollywood-Venice Line 68 o. Venice Short Line 71 H. Santa Monica via Sawtelle Line 76 I. westgate Line 80 J. Santa Monica Air Line 84 K. Soldier's Home Branch Line 93 L. Redondo Beach-Del Rey Line 96 M. Inglewood Line 102 IV. SOUTHIRN DISTRICT 106 A. Long Beach Line 108 B. American Avenue-North Long Beach Line 116 c. Newport-Balboa Line 118 D. E1 Segundo Line 123 E. San Pedro via Dominguez Line 129 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolink AVT Palmdale
    AVT Lancaster Connections to/from Metrolink AVT Palmdale Vincent Grade/ Free Connections Acton REGIONAL SYSTEM MA P Anaheim Resort Transit Vista Canyon ART WITH FREE CO NNECTIONS AVT AVTA STC Via Princessa BPS Baldwin Park Shuttle BMT Beaumont Transit STC Santa Clarita BAS Burbank Airport Shuttle LOS ANGELES BRB Burbank Bus AVT LAC STC Newhall CO. CMB Commerce Municipal Bus VENTURA CC Corona Cruiser LMB CO. Sylmar/ LMB EMS El Monte Commuter Shuttle LDT LMB San Fernando LMB GLB FHT Foothill Transit t – BAS BRB TOR Sun Valley BAS STC GLB Glendale Beeline SAN BERNARDINO OMT LDT GCT Gold Coast Transit STC LMR CO. BMT MPS APU/Citrus College ISH iShuttle SIM Burbank Airpor LMB North (AV Line) LMB OMT Ventura – East VCT VCT LMB LMB FHT GCT OMT LAC LA County DPW Shuttle LMB LAC VCT VCT SIM LDT LDT LDT BUR RTA OxnardGCT Camarillo Moorpark Simi Valley Chatsworth Northridge CMB LMB FHT FHT LMB Van Nuys GLB FHT LA Metro Bus Burbank – Downtown AVT FHT BPS OMT FHT FHT LMR LA Metro Rail EMS OMT FHT OMT OMT Chatsworth North Hollywood Glendale LDT LADOT MBL Montebello Bus Lines LMB Cal State L.A.El Monte Baldwin ParkCovina Pomona – ClaremontNorth Montclair Upland Rancho CucamongaFontana Rialto San BernardinoSan Depot Bernardino – Downtown BRB L.A. Union Station MPS Monterey Park Spirit Bus Burbank Airport - San BernardinoRedlands – TippecanoeRedlands – Esri Redlands – Downtown – University South (VC Line) Atlantic ONT BAS NCS NCTD - Sprinter/Breeze 7th/Metro NWT Wilshire/Western MBL Norwalk Transit LMB Montebello/ OMT OCT OCTA CommerceCMB Santa Monica
    [Show full text]
  • BUS BOOK MECH B 11/29/10 3:09 PM Page 1
    BUS BOOK MECH B 11/29/10 3:09 PM Page 1 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K BUSRoutes and Schedules Effective January 3,BOOK 2011 to May 2, 2011 RESOLVE TO RIDE. 1-800-9-OMNIBUS OMNITRANS.ORG Welcome Aboard! Table of Contents Pass Outlets 2-3 Expendios de pases Passes by Mail 96 Pases por correo Fare Information 4-6 Información del precio Calendar 3 Calendario How to Ride 7-10 Cómo Viajar Transfer Centers 11-13 Centros de transbordo Destinations 14 Destinos Telephone Numbers 15 Números de teléfono Bike & Ride 16 Pedalear y viajar Wheelchair Lift 17 Elevador para sillas de ruedas Route Maps & Schedules 18-91 Mapas y horarios de rutas Access, Omnilink 92 - 95 Access, Omnilink WHAT’S NEW NOVEDADES What’s new for January? Only minor changes to a few of ¿Qué hay de nuevo para enero? Solo cambios menores a our routes. Maps for Routes 3-4 and 82 will reflect minor algunos de nuestros recorridos. Los mapas de los changes in routing and service enhancements. recorridos 3-4 y 82 reflejarán cambios menores en los recorridos y mejoras del servicio. Routes 3-4 Run time changes to all days. Routing El horario del recorrido de las rutas 3-4 ha cambiado around the 4th Street Transit Mall has been altered and para todos los días. El recorrido por 4th Street Transit the time point has been moved to Court and E Streets. Mall ha sido modificado y el cartel con los horarios ha sido llevado a las calles Court y E Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors Meeting November 6, 2019 10:00 Am
    AGENDA Board of Directors Meeting November 6, 2019 10:00 a.m. LOCATION San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Santa Fe Depot – First Floor Lobby Board Room 1170 W. 3rd Street, San Bernardino, CA Board of Directors President Larry McCallon, Mayor Pro Tem Jim Cox, Council Member Darcy McNaboe, Mayor City of Highland City of Victorville City of Grand Terrace Rhodes “Dusty” Rigsby, Mayor David Avila, Mayor Pro Tem Vice-President City of Loma Linda City of Yucaipa Frank Navarro, Mayor City of Colton John Dutrey, Mayor Rick Denison, Council Member City of Montclair Town of Yucca Valley Gabriel Reyes, Mayor City of Adelanto Edward Paget, Vice Mayor Robert Lovingood, Supervisor City of Needles County of San Bernardino Art Bishop, Council Member Town of Apple Valley Alan Wapner, Council Member Janice Rutherford, Supervisor City of Ontario County of San Bernardino Julie McIntyre, Mayor City of Barstow L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Dawn Rowe, Supervisor City of Rancho Cucamonga County of San Bernardino Bill Jahn, Council Member City of Big Bear Lake Toni Momberger, Council Member Curt Hagman, Supervisor City of Redlands County of San Bernardino Eunice Ulloa, Mayor City of Chino Deborah Robertson, Mayor Josie Gonzales, Supervisor City of Rialto County of San Bernardino Ray Marquez, Council Member City of Chino Hills John Valdivia, Mayor Michael Beauchamp, Caltrans City of San Bernardino Ex-Officio Member Acquanetta Warren, Mayor City of Fontana Joel Klink, Mayor Pro Tem Ray Wolfe, Executive Director City of Twentynine Palms Rebekah Swanson, Council Member Julianna Tillquist, General Counsel City of Hesperia Debbie Stone, Mayor City of Upland San Bernardino County Transportation Authority San Bernardino Council of Governments AGENDA Board of Directors November 6, 2019 10:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Plan for Electric Passenger Rail on the Santa Cruz Branch Rail Line
    Transit Corridor Alternatives Analysis & Rail Network Integration Study Business Plan for Electric Passenger Rail on the Santa Cruz Branch Rail Line DRAFT March 2021 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 - Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1-1 2 – Locally Preferred Alternative ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Characteristics of Passenger Rail for the SCBRL ............................................................. 2-1 2.2 Local and Regional Integration ....................................................................................... 2-9 3 - Governance ................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Policies and Programs ..................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Role of Governing Body .................................................................................................. 3-2 3.3 Description of Potential Governance Models ................................................................ 3-4 3.4 Public Private Partnerships ............................................................................................. 3-7 3.5 RTC Governance Strategy ............................................................................................... 3-7 4 - Cost Estimates ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail
    TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PASSENGER RAIL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TECHNICAL REPORT DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 2 REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE 2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 3 ANALYTICAL APPROACH 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6 STRATEGIES 27 NEXT STEPS 44 CONCLUSION 45 TECHNICAL REPORT PASSENGER RAIL DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT connectsocal.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM This Connect SoCal Passenger Rail report lays out a vision of passenger rail services for the SCAG Region for the next three decades. It demonstrates Passenger Rail the progress that has been made over the last two decades in terms of growing ridership, new rail services, capital improvements and new funding opportunities. It demonstrates the regional importance and significance of passenger rail in the SCAG region, and why growing rail services by increasing frequencies in underserved corridors, as well as establishing service in unserved markets, is crucial to the future mobility and sustainability of our region. The report highlights recent success in establishing new funding opportunities for passenger rail, including the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) and Senate Bill (SB) 1. Amtrak’s Pacific Surfliner intercity rail service is benefiting from these new funding opportunities as well as recent institutional arrangements that establish local control for the service. The Southern California Regional Rail Authority’s (SCRRA) Southern California Optimized Rail Expansion (SCORE) program is an ambitious
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUTER RAIL in SUBURBAN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA a Thesis
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE THE GROWTH EFFECT: COMMUTER RAIL IN SUBURBAN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts in Geography By Matthew E. Nordstrom August 2015 Signature Page The thesis of Matthew Nordstrom approved: ________________________________________ _______________ Dr. James Craine Date ________________________________________ _______________ Dr. Mintesnot Woldeamanuel Date ________________________________________ _______________ Dr. Ronald Davidson, Chair Date California State University, Northridge ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my committee chair, Dr. Ron Davidson who has been a mentor for me since my undergraduate days. I would also like to thank my other committee members, Dr. James Craine and Mintesnot Woldeamanuel for their support. I also want to thank my wife who has given me tremendous support and has helped push me through so I can do what I need to do to chase my dreams. Lastly, I also want to thank my mother, a schoolteacher who is passionate about education and has stuck by my side throughout my schooling years, always giving me support and bringing out the best in me. iii Table of Contents Signature Page ................................................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Bernardino Associated Governments
    San Bernardino County Maglev to Las Vegas Los Angeles County San Bernardino County KENDALL RIVERSIDE Long Range Transit Plan 40TH RANCHO CUCAMONGA 15 215 Final ReportSIERRA TC STATE 20TH HIGHLAND 210 210 19TH DEL ROSA EUCLID ETIWANDA FONTANA E AYALA MILLIKEN HIGHLAND BASELINE PALM CARNELIAN BASELINE WATERMAN STERLING BOULDER UPLAND ARCHIBALD 9TH MEDICAL CENT ER CITRUS GREENSPOT CHURCH HAVEN SIERRA RIALTO 5TH 3RD Metro Gold FOOTHILL 2ND Line to RIALTO TC ARROW Pasadena G CHERRY 210 ARROWHEAD SAN BERNARDINO JERSEY ALDER MT MT VERNON MILL 2 SIERRA TC 2 TC MERRILL 2 RANCHO 6TH ORANGE VINEYARD MONTEVISTA STATE 38 4TH SAN BERNARDINO TIPPECANOE MOUNTAIN 10 MILL CREEK To Pomona RIVERSIDE CLEVELAND TC LUGONIA MONTCLAIR INLAND EMPIRE ONTARIO MILLS VALLEY G ALABAMA Transcenter PEPPER HOSPITALITY REDLAND S HOLT SP AIRPORT CALIFORNIA TC TC LA CADENA STATE ANDERSON CITRUS SANTA ANA TC 9TH CRAFTON CACTUS CAJON WABASH SAND CANYON MISSION 15 BARTON JURUPA LOCUST ONTARIO CEDAR COLTON WASHINGTON TC YUCAIPA BRYANT FRANCIS MT VERNON LOMA LINDA 2 MILLIKEN CYPRESS YUCAIPA CENTRAL PHILADELPHIA 2 MU LBERRY 10 60 215 AVENUE E WALNUT REDLANDS HAVEN GROVE GRAND TERRACE RAMONA RIVERSIDE ARCHIBALD CHINO TC Riverside County GRAND Replace RTA EDISON SANANTONIO Route 36 PEYTON CHINO HILLS CHINO In Association with KIMBALL GROVE Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. To Cal Poly To LimonitePatti Post & Associates Pomona Shopping Center Vision BRT Routes San Bernardino Avenue Vision Maglev TC Transit Center CHINO HILLS M.I.G. E Street Grand/Edison Avenues Vision Rail
    [Show full text]
  • San Bernardino Line
    SAN BERNARDINO LINE 57.94 S. Arrowhead Ave./1.20 42.4 CP ROCHESTER 45 mph t/o 57.82 S. D St./1.10 42.12 RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATION *DIB 57.76 CP REDLANDS 40.65 Hermosa Ave. 57.67 S. E St./1.00 40.2 CP ARCHIBALD 45 mph t/o 57.58 SAN BERNARDINO TRANSIT CENTER 40.14 Archibald Ave. 57.48 Ped. xing QZ 39.64 Hellman Ave. 57.42 S. G St./0.70 QZ 39.13 Vineyard Ave. 57.4 CP MORRIS 20 mph x/o 38.63 Baker Ave. 57.14 W. Rialto Ave./0.50 QZ SIGNAL 38.1/38.2 56.98 W. 2nd St./0.27 QZ 38.13 Grove Ave. 56.7 CP KENDALL 25 mph c/o 10 mph t/o 37.38 Campus Ave. 56.53 SAN BERNARDINO DEPOT 37.05 UPLAND STATION *DIB E/B Metrolink San Gabriel Sub. 87/87 36.98 2ND Ave. 56.3 CP VERNON 25 mph t/o c/o 36.81 Euclid Ave.* count as 2 str. N & S 55.3 CP RANCHO 53.9 E/B 45 MPH SIGNAL 36.1/36.2 55.24 Rancho Ave. 36.27 San Antonio Ave. 54.9 DETECTOR (talk) HB/DE 35.73 Mountain Ave. 54.54 Rialto Ave. 35.11 Benson Ave. SIGNAL 53.1/53.2 34.61 Central Ave. 53.95 Pepper Ave. 34.6 CP CENTRAL 40 mph t/o 53.70 Eucalyptus Ave. 34.26 MONTCLAIR STATION 53.45 Acacia St. 34.05 CP VISTA 15 mph t/o 53.19 Sycamore Ave.
    [Show full text]