DOCSLIB.ORG

MGS B 14.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MGS B 14.Pdf Minnesota Geological Survey LIBRARY m~r Uuiurrliity nf .itiuurlintu MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WILLIAM H. EMMONS, DIRECTOR IN COOP. ATION WITH THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN NO. 14 SURFACE FORMATIONS AND AGRICULTURAL CONDITIONS OF THE SOUTH HALF OF MINNESOTA BY FRANK LEVERETT AND FREDERICK W. SARDESON WITH A CHAPTER ON CLIMATiC CONDITIONS IN MINNESOTA BY U. G. PURSSELL Minnesota Geological Sumy LIBRARY MINNEAPOLIS The University of Minnesota CONTENTS Introduction .............................................. 1-4 Chapter 1. Physical features of Minnesota .................... 5-22 Topography of Minnesota ............................. 5-9 General statement ................................. 5 Altitude ......................................... 6 Relief ............................................ 6 Drainage ......... , " ............................ 6 Lakes .................................... -........ 7 Surface geology ...................................... 10-IS Rock areas ....................................... 10 The earthy mantle .............................. 10 General statement .............................. 10 Residuary material ........................... II Wind deposits ................................ II Glacial deposits .............................. II Stream deposits ............................... 14 Lake deposits ................................ 14 The glacial features and their history ................. 14 Glacial lake features .............................. 16 General soil conditions .................................. IS-22 Vegetation ., ..................................... 19 Weathering _...................................... 19 Lime ............................................ 21 Effect of fires ..................................... 21 Chapter II. Climatic conditions ............................. 23-44 Introduction ......................................... 23- 2 4 General climatic conditions .............................. 24-44 Temperature ..................................... 24 Frosts .......................................... 31 Precipitation ...................................... 36 Snowfall .......... , ............................. 40 Winds ........................................... 40 Relative humidity ................................ 41 Number of rainy days ............... '" ...... '" ... 41 Sunshine ........................................ 41 Chapter III. Agricultural conditions and land classification in the south half of Minnesota ........................ '" ........ 45-62 General statement ..................................... 45 Driftless area ........................................ 45-46 Loess-covered pre-Wisconsin drift ....................... 46-47 iv CONTENTS Old gray drift (Kansan) with little or no loess cover ....... 47 Iowan drift over Kansan drift ......................... 47-48 Old red drift (Illinoian) over old gray drift (Kansan) .... 48-49 Young or Wisconsin red drift (Patrician ice sheet) ....... 49-50 Young or Wisconsin red drift (Labradorian ice sheet) ..... 50 Border of young gray drift (Keewatin ice sheet) in central Minnesota .......................................... 50-51 Border of young gray drift in southwestern Minnesota ..... 51-52 Moraines of southwestern Minnesota .................... 52-53 Moraines of southeastern Minnesota ..................... 53 Overlap of red drift by gray drift in Grantsburg lobe ....... 53-54 Gray drift moraines of central Minnesota ................ 54-55 The great plain of the Minnesota lobe .................... 55-56 The great Red River plain .............................. 56-57 The Lake Agassiz area ................................. 57 Outwash sand and gravel plains ........................ 57-58 Alluvial bottoms ...................................... 58 Farming development in Minnesota ..................... 58-60 Rank of different crops in Minnesota .................... 60-62 Relation of crop values to farm investments in southern Min- nesota .............................•........•........ 62 Chapter IV. Descriptions of counties ....................... 63- 142 Pine County ......................................... 63-64 Southern Aitkin County ............................... 64-65 Kanabec County ..................................... 65-66 Mille Lacs County ...................................... 66-67 Southern Crow Wing County .......................... 67-68 Southern Cass County .................................. 68 Morrison County ..................................... 68-70 Todd County ........................................ 70-71 Southern Otter Tail County ............................. 71-72 Douglas County ...................................... 72 -73 Grant County ......................................... 73-74 Wilkin County ....................................... 74-75 Traverse County .......................... '" ......... 75-77 Big Stone County .................................... 77-78 Stevens County ...................................... 78-79 Pope County ......................................... 79-81 Stearns County ...................................... 81-82 Benton County ........................................ 82-83 Sherburne County .................................... 84-85 Isanti County ........................................ 85-86 CONTENTS v Anoka County ........................................ 86-87 Chisago County ...................................... 87-88 Washington County .................................. 88-89 Ramsey County ...................................... 89-90 Hennepin County .................................... 91-92 Wright County ................... , ................... 92 -93 Meeker County ....................................... 93-94 Kandiyohi County .................................... 95-96 Swift County ••........................................ ¢-97 Chippewa County .................................... 97 Lac qui Parle County .•................................. 98 Yellow Medicine County ............................... 99 Renville County ....................................... 100 McLeod County ..................................... lor Sibley County ........................................ 101-2 Carver County ....................................... 102-3 Scott County .......................................... 103-4 Dakota County ...................................... 104-6 Goodhue County ..................................... 106-9 Rice County .......................................... 109-II Le Sueur County ..................................... 1II-12 Nicollet County ....................................... II2-13 Brown County ....................................... 113-14 Redwood County ...................................... II4-1 5 Lyon County ......................................... II 5-16 Lincoln County ....................................... 116-1 7 Pipestone County ..................................... 117-19 Murray County ....................................... II 9-20 Cottonwood County .................................. 120-21 Watonwan County ..................................... 121-22 Blue Earth County .................................... 122-2 4 Waseca County ....................................... 124-2 5 Steele County ........................................ 125-26 Dodge County ........................................ 126-2 7 Olmsted County ..................................... 127-28 Wabasha County .... , ................................. 128-2 9 Winona County ...................................... 129-31 Houston County ...................................... 13 1-32 Fillmore County ...................................... 132 -33 Mower County ........................................ 133-35 Freeborn County ..................................... 135-36 Faribault County ...................................... 136-37 vi CONTENTS Martin County ........... , ............................ 137-38 Jackson County ........................................ 138-39 Nobles County ........................................ 139-41 Rock County ..................... .................... 141-42 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Plate I. Map of the surface formations of Minnesota ..... in pocket II. A. Bed of Lake Agassiz near Wheaton B. Grain field in bed of Lake Agassiz near Wheaton C. Gray drift till plain in Chisago County. 58 III. A. Cultivated red drift till plain near Foley B. Red drift till plain with forest near Foley C. Boulders on red drift till plain near Foley. 62 IV. A. Gray drift moraine north of St. Paul B. Red drift moraine with coating of gray drift north of St. PauL....................... 90 V. A. Wisconsin, or young red drift, moraine near Stillwater B. Old red drift moraine near Hampton. 92 VI. A. Outwash plain east of Anoka B. Outwash plain of gray drift west of White Bear C. Outwash plain with thick clayey covering north of St. PauL............................. 94 VII. A. Slope of the Coteau des Prairies near Canby. Gray drift moraine B. Eroded upland in old gray (Kansan) drift north­ east of Zumbrota C. Broad valley cut in old gray (Kansan) drift west of Kenyon.......................... 108 VIII. A. Loess-covered driftiess area near Caledonia B. Valleys bordered by limestone tablelands near Hampton ............................... 132 IX. A. Zumbro valley near Rochester B. Valley of Rollingstone River near Minnesota City C. Mississippi valley at Minnesota City. 140 viii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS TEXT FIGURES Fig. 1. Altitude map of Minnesota.. 8 2. Map of glacial drifts, loess, and glacial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Preliminary Survey of the Bird Life of North Dakota
    UNIVERSITY OP MICHIGAN MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY Miscellaneous Publications No. 10 A Preliminary Survey of the Bird Life of North Dakota BY NORMAN A. WOOD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY JULY 2, 1923 OUTLINE MAP OF NORTH DAKOTA UNIVERSI'rY OF hlICHIGAN MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY Miscellaneous Publications No. 10 A Preliminary Survey of the Bird Life of North Dakota RY NORMAN A. WOOD ANN ARBOR, MICIIIGAN PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY JULY 2, I923 The publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigart, consist of two series-the Occasional Papers and the Miscellaneous PubK- cations. Both series were founded bv Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Bradsl~aw I-I. Swales and Dr. W. W. Newcomb. The Occasional Papers, publication of which was begun in 1913, j-rve as a medium for the publication of brief oriqinal papers based principally upon the collections in the Museum. The papers are issued separately to libraries and specialists, and, when a sufficient nu~uberof pages have l~crn printed to make a volume, a title page, index, and table of contents are sup- plied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list for the entire series. The Miscellaneous Publications include papers on field and museum technique, monographic studies and other papers not within the scope of the Occasional Papers. The papers are published separately, and, as it is not intended that they shall be grouped into volumes, each number has a title page and, when necessary, a table of contents. ALEXANDERG. RUTHITEN, Director of the Museum of Zoology, [Jniversity ~f Michigan. A PRELIMINARY SURVEY OF THE BIRD LIFE OF NORTH DAKOTA The field studies upon which this paper is largely based were carried on during the summers of 1920 and 1921.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY and GROUND WATER RESOURCE S of Stutsman County, North Dakota
    North Dakota Geological Survey WILSON M. LAIRD, State Geologis t BULLETIN 41 North Dakota State Water Conservation Commission MILO W . HOISVEEN, State Engineer COUNTY GROUND WATER STUDIES 2 GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER RESOURCE S of Stutsman County, North Dakota Part I - GEOLOG Y By HAROLD A. WINTERS GRAND FORKS, NORTH DAKOTA 1963 This is one of a series of county reports which wil l be published cooperatively by the North Dakota Geological Survey and the North Dakota State Water Conservation Commission in three parts . Part I is concerned with geology, Part II, basic data which includes information on existing well s and test drilling, and Part III which will be a study of hydrology in the county . Parts II and III will be published later and will be distributed a s soon as possible . CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Acknowledgments 3 Previous work 5 GEOGRAPHY 5 Topography and drainage 5 Climate 7 Soils and vegetation 9 SUMMARY OF THE PRE-PLEISTOCENE STRATIGRAPHY 9 Precambrian 1 1 Paleozoic 1 1 Mesozoic 1 1 PREGLACIAL SURFICIAL GEOLOGY 12 Niobrara Shale 1 2 Pierre Shale 1 2 Fox Hills Sandstone 1 4 Fox Hills problem 1 4 BEDROCK TOPOGRAPHY 1 4 Bedrock highs 1 5 Intermediate bedrock surface 1 5 Bedrock valleys 1 5 GLACIATION OF' NORTH DAKOTA — A GENERAL STATEMENT 1 7 PLEISTOCENE SEDIMENTS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED LANDFORMS 1 8 Till 1 8 Landforms associated with till 1 8 Glaciofluvial :materials 22 Ice-contact glaciofluvial sediments 2 2 Landforms associated with ice-contact glaciofluvial sediments 2 2 Proglacial fluvial sediments 2 3 Landforms associated with proglacial fluvial sediments 2 3 Lacustrine sediments 2 3 Landforms associated with lacustrine sediments 2 3 Other postglacial sediments 2 4 ANALYSIS OF THE SURFICIAL TILL IN STUTSMAN COUNTY 2 4 Leaching and caliche 24 Oxidation 2 4 Stone counts 2 5 Lignite within till 2 7 Grain-size analyses of till _ 2 8 Till samples from hummocky stagnation moraine 2 8 Till samples from the Millarton, Eldridge, Buchanan and Grace Cit y moraines and their associated landforms _ .
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3, District Resources and Description
    CHAPTER 3— District Resources and Description Bridgette Flanders-Wanner / USFWS / Bridgette Flanders-Wanner Grasslands in the Millerdale Waterfowl Production Area. The three wetland management districts manage smaller temporary and seasonal wetlands that draw thousands of noncontiguous tracts of Federal land breeding duck pairs to South Dakota and other parts totaling 1,136,965 acres: 100,094 acres of WPAs and of the Prairie Pothole Region. 1,036,871 acres of conservation easements. This chap­ ter describes the physical environment and biological CLIMATE CHANGE resources of these district lands, as well as fire and In January 2001, the Department of the Interior is­ grazing history, cultural resources, visitor services, sued Order 3226, requiring its Federal agencies with socioeconomic environment, and district operations. land management responsibilities to consider potential climate change effects as part of long-range planning endeavors. The U.S. Department of Energy’s report, “Carbon Sequestration Research and Development,” 3.1 Physical Environment concluded that ecosystem protection is important to carbon sequestration and may reduce or prevent loss The districts are located in central and eastern South of carbon currently stored in the terrestrial biosphere. Dakota from west of the Missouri River to the Minnesota The report defines carbon sequestration as “the capture state line, and from the North Dakota border roughly and secure storage of carbon that would otherwise be two-thirds of the way south to the state line of Nebraska. emitted to or remain in the atmosphere.” The increase The prairies of South Dakota have become an eco­ of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the earth’s atmosphere has logical treasure of biological importance for water­ been linked to the gradual rise in surface temperature fowl and other migratory birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Conservation Plan Huron Wetland Management District Madison Wetland Management District Sand Lake Wetland Management District South Dakota
    Comprehensive Conservation Plan Huron Wetland Management District Madison Wetland Management District Sand Lake Wetland Management District South Dakota January 2012 Approved by Stephen D. Guertin, Regional Director Date U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6 Lakewood, Colorado Prepared by Huron Wetland Management District Room 309 Federal Building 200 Fourth Street SW. Huron, South Dakota 57350 605 / 352 5894 Madison Wetland Management District 23520 SD Highway 19 Madison, South Dakota 57042 605 / 256 2974 Sand Lake Wetland Management District 39650 Sand Lake Drive Columbia, South Dakota 57433 605 / 885 6320 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 6, Mountain–Prairie Region Division of Refuge Planning 134 Union Boulevard, Suite 300 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 303 / 236 8145 CITATION for this document: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012. Comprehensive conservation plan: Huron Wetland Management District, Madison Wetland Management District, and Sand Lake Wetland Management District, South Dakota. Lakewood, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 260 p. Comprehensive Conservation Plan Huron Wetland Management District Madison Wetland Management District Sand Lake Wetland Management District South Dakota Submitted by Concurred with by Clarke Dirks Date Richard A. Coleman, Ph.D. Date Project Leader Assistant Regional Director Huron Wetland Management District U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6 Huron, South Dakota National Wildlife Refuge System Lakewood, Colorado Natoma Buskness Date Paul Cornes Date Project Leader Refuge Supervisor Madison Wetland Management District U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6 Madison, South Dakota National Wildlife Refuge System Lakewood, Colorado Harris Hoistad Date Project Leader Sand Lake National Wildlife Refuge Complex Columbia, South Dakota Contents Summary .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Dakota State Research Guide Family History Sources in the Peace Garden State
    North Dakota State Research Guide Family History Sources in the Peace Garden State North Dakota History The first Europeans in the area arrived the last part of the eighteenth century and were fur traders employed by the Missouri Fur Company. The peopling of the area quickly followed the first exploration with settlements in Selkirk Colony, on the Red and Assiniboine rivers, and the Pembina settlement. Both were established in 1812, but conditions were so difficult that by 1823 Selkirk had become part of the Hudson Bay Company settlement and Pembina had been abandoned. The indigenous tribes of the Dakotas were the Mandans and Arikaras. Eastern tribes that were moved into the area included Hidatsas, Crows, Cheyennes, Creeks, Assiniboines, Yanktonai Dakotas, Teton Dakotas, and Chippewas. The smallpox epidemics in 1782 and 1786 wiped out three-fourths of the Mandans and half of the Hidatsas. The epidemic of 1837, probably introduced by the white fur traders, also had a devastating effect on the native population. Composing the largest settlement at the Red River were the “half-breeds” (called métis) who were the offspring of European fathers (French, Canadian, Scottish, and English) and Native American mothers (Chippewa, Creek, Assiniboine). Many area residents claimed French-Chippewa ancestry. By 1850 more than half of the five to six thousand people living at Fort Garry were métis, with a large percentage being Canadian- born. Settlers began moving into the region in 1849 with the organization of Minnesota Territory and the settlement of Iowa and Minnesota. This immigration brought a number of settlers to southeastern Dakota. Dakota Territory was created by an act of Congress on 2 March 1861 from the area that had previously been Nebraska and Minnesota territories.
    [Show full text]
  • Meandering Water in the Prairie Pothole Region of South Dakota and Its Economic Impact
    Meandering water in the prairie pothole region of South Dakota and its economic impact Matthew Elliott South Dakota State University [email protected] Tong Wang South Dakota State University [email protected] Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the 2016 Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, July 31st-August 2nd Copyright 2016 by Matthew Elliott and Tong Wang. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. Abstract This study estimates the economic impact of surface water changes in the prairie pothole region (PPR) of South Dakota. Flooding of wetlands and the formation of larger lakes has been documented in this region after 1993. To analyze the land cover change related to climate, or drainage, we examine Landsat 5 satellite data, 30 meter digital elevation model (DEM), the National Hydrology Dataset (NHD), the National Land Cover Database (NLCD), and the NRCS soil survey (SSURGO) using linear discriminant analysis. The changes in surface water, cropland, and grassland acres for 5 counties will be measured in northeast South Dakota between 1990 and 2010. These measurements will identify the area lost and gained for potential agriculture revenue given soil types, historical weather, topography, management characteristics, etc. The agriculture production potential will be estimated by simulation given the location and characteristics of the lost or gained acres utilizing the APEX model. Findings include the net acres lost/gained from cropland and grassland production, and the estimated average revenue potential of grassland and cropland acres inundated, or drained, during the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the Dakotas
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2020 Fishes of the Dakotas Kathryn Schlafke South Dakota State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Schlafke, Kathryn, "Fishes of the Dakotas" (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3942. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/3942 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FISHES OF THE DAKOTAS BY KATHRYN SCHLAFKE A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science Major in Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Specialization in Fisheries Science South Dakota State University 2020 ii THESIS ACCEPTANCE PAGE Kathryn Schlafke This thesis is approved as a creditable and independent investigation by a candidate for the master’s degree and is acceptable for meeting the thesis requirements for this degree. Acceptance of this does not imply that the conclusions reached by the candidate are necessarily the conclusions of the major department. Brian Graeb, Ph.D. Advisor Date Michele R. Dudash Department Head Date Dean, Graduate School Date iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank my advisors throughout this project, Dr. Katie Bertrand and Dr. Brian Graeb for giving me the opportunity to work towards a graduate degree at South Dakota State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Hod Chapter 1
    The Grassland Setting 1 CHAPTER 1 The Grassland Setting THE STORY OF NORTH DAKOTA begins with geology. Invasions of a great salt sea laid down the strata in which oil and other mineral deposits are found, and, later, fresh-water rivers formed strata containing lignite beds. Erosion, caused by wind, water, and glacial ice sheets, shaped the surface of the land, leaving what is now North Dakota as part of two significant physiographic provinces of North America: the Central Lowlands and the Great Plains. Within the state, the Central Lowlands Province is subdivided into the Drift Prairie and the Red River Valley and is separated from the Great Plains Province by the Missouri Escarpment. Thus divided into three distinct regions, North Dakota is a rather 2 History of North Dakota large state, a rectangle some 335 miles from east to west and 210 miles north to south, with an area of 70,665 square miles. It is located at the center of the continent, roughly 1,500 miles from the Atlantic Ocean and also from the Pacific, and about the same distance from the Gulf of Mexico and the Arctic Archipelago. GEOLOGY The Williston Basin, a saucer-like depression in the igneous granite crust of the earth's surface, had its origin half a billion years ago when the granite crust began to sink, a process which continued several million years. It now extends over some 130,000 square miles, about 50,000 square miles of which underlie North Dakota. The basin reaches from eastern North Dakota (Devils Lake and Jamestown are near its eastern edge) into Montana, and from northwestern South Dakota into Manitoba and Saskatchewan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Souris River Study Unit
    The Souris River Study Unit.................................................................................11.1 Description of the Souris River Study Unit ......................................................11.1 Physiography ................................................................................................ 11.6 Drainage ....................................................................................................... 11.6 Climate.......................................................................................................... 11.7 Landforms and Soils..................................................................................... 11.8 Floodplains ............................................................................................... 11.8 Terraces .................................................................................................... 11.9 Valley Walls.............................................................................................. 11.9 Alluvial Fans........................................................................................... 11.10 Upland Plains ......................................................................................... 11.10 Flora and Fauna ......................................................................................... 11.10 Other Natural Resource Potential............................................................... 11.11 Overview of Previous Archeological Work .....................................................11.12 Inventory
    [Show full text]
  • Ndstudies.Gov
    Volume 11, Issue 1 NORTH DAKOTA STUDIES A Program of the State Historical Society of North Dakota • Winter 2019 Speaking of History By Barbara Handy-Marchello, Ph.D. sing maps to teach North Dakota Studies is one of the best ways to Uenable students to fully understand concepts related to geography and major historical events. Because geography has often been neglected in elementary and high school curricula, many students in college classes can seldom identify even the most basic geographic sites. Many students cannot identify significant geographic locations relevant to their own local and state history, yet they are expected to know global sites. NORTH DAKOTA STUDIES Using Maps To Teach North Dakota Studies There are many types of maps including political, physical, topographic, resource, and road maps. For the purposes of this article, the emphasis will be on political and physical maps. Political maps primarily focus on the state, territory, and national boundaries of a place, but also have historical value. Physical maps document landscape features of a place and generally show things like mountains, rivers, and lakes. In the classroom, maps are found in standard texts or projected from support technology. In teaching about the settlement of North Dakota, for example, teachers can use maps found at ndstudies.gov to demonstrate how the railroads impacted where immigrants settled in In 1801, a Blackfoot named Ac ko mok ki drew a map in the snow or dirt for Peter Fidler of the Hudson’s Bay Company. Hudson’s Bay Company Archives, T11048 North Dakota. When teaching about North Ac ko mok ki Map—1801 One of Fidler’s mapmakers was a Dakota’s geography and history, When the United States acquired the Blackfoot named Ac ko mok ki, or maps enhance student activities Louisiana Purchase, few people knew “The Feathers” in English.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 9 the Opening of the Missouri Plateau
    174 History of North Dakota CHAPTER 9 The Opening of the Missouri Plateau THE SETTLEMENT OF AMERICA rolled westward across the continent like a series of waves inundating the land. Frederick Jackson Turner, the renowned historian of the American frontier, vividly described the movement in his essay “The Significance of the Frontier in American History” when he wrote: “Stand at Cumberland Gap and watch the procession of civilization, marching single file–the buffalo following the trail to the salt springs, the Indian, the fur-trader and hunter, the cattle- raiser, the pioneer farmer–and the frontier has passed by. Stand at South Pass in the Rockies a century later and see the same procession with wider intervals between.” The region of which North Dakota is a part experienced similar waves in human occupation. Long before the coming of the white men, a succession of Indian migrants entered the area. White traders began to arrive late in the eighteenth century. Then the metis and the Scots brought in by Lord Selkirk occupied the Lower Red River Valley with an economy based on farming and the buffalo hunt. The next wave, pushed along by the Great Dakota Boom, carried thousands of farmers, land speculators, railroad construction workers, and townsmen–all mingled together–into the Red River Valley and the Drift Prairie. The rush and excitement of the Great Dakota Boom did not bring many white men to the Missouri Plateau. The nature of the country made a difference; occupation of the plateau presented more difficult problems of adjustment to a semiarid grassland.
    [Show full text]
  • Devils Lake Wetland Management District
    NARRATIVE REPORT for Calendar Year 1966 Devils Lake Wetland Management District Devils Lake, North Dakota Permanent Personnel Don R. Perkuchin . Refuge Manager • .. " y.V-'/ CONTENTS Pa^e I. General A. Description of the Area 1 B. Status of the Acquisition Program 1 C. Weather Conditions 2 D. Habitat Conditions 4 II. Wildlife A. Migratory Birds 5 B. Upland Game Birds g C. Other Birds 3 D. Big Game Animals g E. Fur Animals, Predators, Rodents and other Mammals g F. Rare, Endangered and Status Undermined Species g G. Fish 9 H. Reptiles and Amphibians 9 I. Disease 9 III. W.P.A. Development and Maintenance A. Physical Development 9 B. Plantings 10 C. Cultivated Crops 12 D. Collection and Receipts 12 E. Control of Vegetation 12 F. Fires 12 IV. Resource Management A. Grazing 13 B. Haying 13 C. Fur Harvest 14 V. Field Investigation or Applied Research A. Wildlife Management Studies 14 B. Biological Tinkering 14 VI. Easement Administration 14 VII. Public Relations A. Recreational Uses 15 B. Refuge Visitors 15 C. Refuge Participation ^5 D. Hunting ^5 E. Violations 15 F. Safety 17 VIII. Other Items . 17 I. GENERAL Description of the Area Ten counties in northeastern North Dakota (see Figure 1) comprise the Devils Lake Wetland Management District. All of this manage­ ment area lies north of the "Coteau du Missouri" in what we Bureau personnel refer to as the "summerfallow barrens". Nearly level deposits of glacial Lake Agassiz (now called the Red River Valley) are the predominant geological feature of the eastern one-fourth of this district.
    [Show full text]