DOCSLIB.ORG

Summits on the Air U.S.A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W0D – The Dakotas) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S109.1 Issue number 1.10 Date of issue 1 December 2015 Participation start date 1 April 2014 Authorised Date: 1 December 2015 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Randy Shirbroun, ND0C [email protected] Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Summits on the Air Award Programme The Dakotas (W0D) Document S109.1 v1.10 Table of contents Page Section 1 Association Reference Data…………………………………………………………………4 1.1 Program Derivation ............................................................................................. 5 1.2 General Information .............................................................................................. 5 1.3 Final Ascent and Activation Zone ......................................................................... 7 1.4 Rights of Way and Access Issues ......................................................................... 8 1.5 Maps and Navigation ............................................................................................ 9 1.6 Safety Considerations ........................................................................................... 9 1.7 Navigation and Weather ..................................................................................... 10 1.8 Physical Exertion ................................................................................................ 11 1.9 Environmental Considerations ............................................................................ 11 1.10 Foreign Radio Amateurs ................................................................................... 11 1.11 Awards .............................................................................................................. 12 1.12 Summit Definition .............................................................................................. 12 1.13 Process to Maintain Summit Lists ..................................................................... 12 Section 2 Summit Reference Data ........................................................................................... 13 2.1 Region BB – Black Hills – Badlands of South Dakota – W0D/BB-xxx ................ 13 2.2 Region NW – Northwest South Dakota – W0D/NW-xxx ..................................... 15 2.3 Region ES – Eastern South Dakota – W0D/ES-xxx ........................................... 17 2.4 Region MR – Missouri River hills and buttes of South Dakota – W0D/MR-xxx ... 18 2.5 Region ND – North Dakota hills and buttes – W0D/ND-xxx ................................ 18 2 Summits on the Air Award Programme The Dakotas (W0D) Document S109.1 v1.10 Change Control Date Version Details 11 Mar 2014 0.90 Draft ARM document for Review 4 Sept 2014 1.00 Final ARM Document Release 1 Dec 2015 1.10 W0D/BB-053 showed wrong summit position. Was -106.6487; 43.6880 now -103.6610; 43.6817. Col position and prominence checked, found to be qualifying. Disclaimer Hiking, hill-walking, rock-scrambling and mountain climbing are potentially hazardous activities particularly in the Dakotas with their extreme low temperatures, climb exposures, and quick weather changes. The SOTA Management Team, the W0D-Dakotas Association and their participants do not accept responsibility for any death or injury resulting from participation in SOTA. The inclusion of a summit in this Reference Manual does not indicate that it is safe, legal, or even possible to climb the summit. The Summit Reference data is not guaranteed to be accurate and no reliance should be placed upon it. Any hiker must be sure to check applicable local, state, and federal laws to be sure that a hike or climb up any of the mountains listed in this manual is legal and safe. Some summits may reside in private hands, and all hikers must respect private property rights. As a particular caution to European hikers, please note that “Every Man’s Right” does not exist in the United States and permission to cross private lands must be expressly granted and cannot be assumed. Some Dakota summits may be technically demanding and may require traditional climbing experience, rope climbing skills, and competent knowledge of route selection and the associated risks. Technical climbing competency is a requirement for many peaks as many routes are technically graded 5.10 or greater based on the Yosemite Decimal System. Many routes offer poor protection with long runouts where a fall could result in serious injury or death. Proper training, experience, and personal capability assessment is required. Skills-based training is readily available from many world-recognized climbing groups including the Mazamas and the Seattle Mountaineers. Do not become a statistic! Copyright Notices ”Summits on the Air” (SOTA) and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Program. This document is copyright of the Program. Some of the source data used in this document herein is from John D. Kirk (http://listsofjohn.com) and is used with his permission. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. 3 Summits on the Air Award Programme The Dakotas (W0D) Document S109.1 v1.10 Association Reference Data for USA (W0D-Dakotas) Association U.S.A. (W0D – The Dakotas) Commencement date 01 April 2014 Regions (5) Region Name REF Identifier Peak Count Black Hills/Badlands BB 118 Northwestern SD NW 63 Eastern SD ES 2 North Dakota ND 41 Missouri River (SD) MR 12 Total No. 236 Peaks: Association parameters 1 Summit operation criteria Operation must be within 80 ft vertically of the summit The Dakotas Peak Count Band 1, score 1 point >= 328 ft asl <2999 ft asl 39 (16.5%) Band 2, score 2 points >= 3000 ft asl <3999 ft asl 44 (18.6%) Band 3, score 4 points >= 4000 ft asl <4999 ft asl 44 (18.6%) Band 4, score 6 points >= 5000 ft asl <5999 ft asl 68 (28.8%) Band 5, score 8 points >= 6000 ft asl <6999 ft asl 35 (14.8%) Band 6, score 10 points >= 7000 ft asl 6 ( 2.5%) Total No. Peaks 236 (100%) Seasonal bonus Winter bonus (3 points) is available for activators under stated conditions Bonus rationale Winter in the Dakotas often results in sub-zero temperatures, gale force winds, and heavy snow. Blizzard conditions with life- threatening wind chills of -50 degrees F. are not uncommon at any elevation. Min. height for bonus Bonus only available for summits with elevations above 3,000 feet Bonus period dates Winter 3 point bonus for activators from 1 December through 31 March Association sponsored awards None yet offered Association Manager Randy Shirbroun, ND0C [email protected] 1 See the SOTA General Rules for parameter definitions 4 Summits on the Air Award Programme The Dakotas (W0D) Document S109.1 v1.10 Acknowledgements The activation of this Association would not have been possible without the effort of many individuals. Invaluable assistance was received from Dennis, WA2USA, who helped develop the proper spreadsheet formats and was there every step of the way Also thanks to Guy, N7UN, and Steve, WG0AT for their support, as well as Jim, G0CQK, who helped initiate this Association. Special thanks go to John Kirk (Lists of John), whose data were crucial in developing this information. 1.1 Program derivation W0D-Dakotas SOTA is an extension of similar programs already active in other countries. Summit qualification for inclusion in the SOTA Program is based on the relative height of summits compared to their surroundings based on summit prominence. Qualification of summits for inclusion in the W0D Dakotas Association uses the P100 criteria and has been approved by the SOTA Management Team (MT). Summits must have a minimum of 100 meters (328 feet) of vertical rise from the surrounding saddle in order to qualify. This vertical separation from surrounding terrain is the basis of the definition of geographic prominence, which Wikipedia has an excellent description. Summit scoring is based on a given summit’s height above sea level (ASL). The W0D-Dakotas SOTA Association encompasses both North Dakota and South Dakota and has 236 SOTA summits that meet the prominence criteria based on data collected by the USGS (U.S. Geologic Survey) national surveys. See this link for more detail about the USGS survey processes. In particular, the USGS maintains a huge (80+ gigabytes) database of National Elevation Data (“NED”) for all surveyed peaks in the USA. The W0D-Dakotas SOTA dataset was derived from this USGS NED database. This database contains both named and un-named mountains (“numbered”) which also meet the prominence requirements of SOTA. The goal of this ARM is to develop a list of qualifying summits that are relatively accessible, climbable, and have a history of ascent. Therefore the “un-named” mountains have been included in this ARM. There are “un-named” or “numbered” peaks in North and South Dakota and named peaks. Participants in the W0D-Dakotas SOTA program must meet the qualifications stated in the SOTA General Rules, and must participate in accordance with these rules. In cases where information in this reference is in conflict with the General Rules, the General Rules shall take precedence. Full text of the SOTA General Rules can be found here. 1.2 General information The W0D-Dakotas SOTA Association includes summits within the state boundaries of both North Dakota and South Dakota. Both states are
Recommended publications
  • Page 5 of the 2020 Antelope, Deer and Elk Regulations

    Page 5 of the 2020 Antelope, Deer and Elk Regulations

    WYOMING GAME AND FISH COMMISSION Antelope, 2020 Deer and Elk Hunting Regulations Don't forget your conservation stamp Hunters and anglers must purchase a conservation stamp to hunt and fish in Wyoming. (See page 6) See page 18 for more information. wgfd.wyo.gov Wyoming Hunting Regulations | 1 CONTENTS Access on Lands Enrolled in the Department’s Walk-in Areas Elk or Hunter Management Areas .................................................... 4 Hunt area map ............................................................................. 46 Access Yes Program .......................................................................... 4 Hunting seasons .......................................................................... 47 Age Restrictions ................................................................................. 4 Characteristics ............................................................................. 47 Antelope Special archery seasons.............................................................. 57 Hunt area map ..............................................................................12 Disabled hunter season extension.............................................. 57 Hunting seasons ...........................................................................13 Elk Special Management Permit ................................................. 57 Characteristics ..............................................................................13 Youth elk hunters........................................................................
  • Cumulative Index North Dakota Historical Quarterly Volumes 1-11 1926 - 1944

    Cumulative Index North Dakota Historical Quarterly Volumes 1-11 1926 - 1944

    CUMULATIVE INDEX NORTH DAKOTA HISTORICAL QUARTERLY VOLUMES 1-11 1926 - 1944 A Aiton, Arthur S., review by, 6:245 Alaska, purchase of, 6:6, 7, 15 A’Rafting on the Mississipp’ (Russell), rev. of, 3:220- 222 Albanel, Father Charles, 5:200 A-wach-ha-wa village, of the Hidatsas, 2:5, 6 Albert Lea, Minn., 1.3:25 Abandonment of the military posts, question of, Albrecht, Fred, 2:143 5:248, 249 Alderman, John, 1.1:72 Abbey Lake, 1.3:38 Aldrich, Bess Streeter, rev. of, 3:152-153; Richard, Abbott, Johnston, rev. of, 3:218-219; Lawrence, speaker, 1.1:52 speaker, 1.1:50 Aldrich, Vernice M., articles by, 1.1:49-54, 1.4:41- Abe Collins Ranch, 8:298 45; 2:30-52, 217-219; reviews by, 1.1:69-70, Abell, E. R, 2:109, 111, 113; 3:176; 9:74 1.1:70-71, 1.2:76-77, 1.2:77, 1.3:78, 1.3:78-79, Abercrombie, N.Dak., 1.3: 34, 39; 1.4:6, 7, 71; 2:54, 1.3:79, 1.3:80, 1.4:77, 1.4:77-78; 2:230, 230- 106, 251, 255; 3:173 231, 231, 231-232, 232-233, 274; 3:77, 150, Abercrombie State Park, 4:57 150-151, 151-152, 152, 152-153, 220-222, 223, Aberdeen, D.T., 1.3:57, 4:94, 96 223-224; 4:66, 66-67, 67, 148, 200, 200, 201, Abraham Lincoln, the Prairie Years (Sandburg), rev. of, 201, 202, 202, 274, 275, 275-276, 276, 277-278; 1.2:77 8:220-221; 10:208; 11:221, 221-222 Abstracts in History from Dissertations for the Degree of Alexander, Dr.
  • Geologic Map of South Dakota

    Geologic Map of South Dakota

    STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA M. Michael Rounds, Governor DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Steven M. Pirner, Secretary DIVISION OF FINANCIAL AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE David Templeton, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Derric L. Iles, State Geologist Geologic Map of South Dakota James E. Martin, J. Foster Sawyer, Mark D. Fahrenbach, Dennis W. Tomhave, Layne D. Schulz 2004 References to Accompany General Map 10 Agnew, A.F., 1957, Areal geology of the White River quadrangle: South Dakota Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map, scale 1:62,500. ____1963, Geology of the Mission quadrangle: South Dakota Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map, scale 1:62,500. Agnew, A.F., and Tychsen, P.C., 1965, A guide to the stratigraphy of South Dakota: South Dakota Geological Survey Bulletin 14, 195 p. Alkhazmi, R.A., 1973, Structural analysis of the Precambrian rocks of the Park Dome area, Custer County, Black Hills of South Dakota: Rapid City, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, M.S. thesis, 92 p. Anna, L.O., 1973, Geology of the Kirk Hill area, Lawrence-Meade Counties, South Dakota: Rapid City, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, M.S. thesis, 47 p. Atkinson, R.D., 1976, Geology of the Pony Gulch area near Mystic, South Dakota: Rapid City, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, M.S. thesis, 21 p. Baird, J.D., 1957, Geology of the Alcester quadrangle, South Dakota–Iowa: Vermillion, University of South Dakota, M.A. thesis, 136 p. Baker, C.L., 1948, The Pennington-Haakon County central boundary area with general discussion of its surroundings: South Dakota Geological Survey Report of Investigations 64, 29 p.
  • Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Management Plan

    Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Management Plan

    Badlands National Park – North Unit Environmental Assessment U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Badlands National Park, North Unit Pennington and Jackson Counties, South Dakota Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Management Plan Environmental Assessment August 2007 Badlands National Park – North Unit Environmental Assessment National Park Service Prairie Dog Management Plan U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Management Plan Environmental Assessment Badlands National Park, North Unit Pennington and Jackson Counties, South Dakota Executive Summary The U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service (NPS) proposes to implement a comprehensive black-tailed prairie dog management plan for the North Unit of Badlands National Park where prairie dog populations have increased from approximately 2,070 acres in 1979 to 6,363 acres in 2006, or 11% of the approximately 60,000 acres of available suitable habitat. The principal objectives of the management plan are to ensure that the black-tailed prairie dog is maintained in its role as a keystone species in the mixed-grass prairie ecosystem on the North Unit, while providing strategies to effectively manage instances of prairie dog encroachment onto adjacent private lands. The plan also seeks to manage the North Unit’s prairie dog populations to sustain numbers sufficient to survive unpredictable events that may cause high mortality, such as sylvatic plague, while at the same time allowing park managers to meet management goals for other North Unit resources. Primary considerations in developing the plan include conservation of the park’s natural processes and conditions, identification of effective tools for prairie dog management, implementing strategies to deal with prairie dog encroachment onto adjacent private lands, and protection of human health and safety.
  • Willow Creek Wind Energy Facility Draft Environmental Assessment

    Willow Creek Wind Energy Facility Draft Environmental Assessment

    Willow Creek Wind Energy Facility Draft Environmental Assessment U.S. Department of Energy Western Area Power Administration DOE/EA-2016 July 2016 Willow Creek Wind Energy Facility Draft Environmental Assessment Butte County, South Dakota U.S. Department of Energy Western Area Power Administration DOE/EA-2016 July 2016 Willow Creek Wind Energy Facility Draft EA Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Western’s Purpose and Need ............................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Wind Quarry’s Goals and Objectives .................................................................. 1-3 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND NO ACTION ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Western’s Proposed Action.................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 Willow Creek Wind Farm ..................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Project Life Cycle ................................................................................. 2-6 2.2 No Action Alternative .......................................................................................... 2-6 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Land Cover and Land Use ..................................................................................
  • Encounters with the Early Highpointers by Charles

    Encounters with the Early Highpointers by Charles

    SOME CLOSE (AND NOT SO CLOSE) ENCOUNTERS WITH THE EARLY HIGHPOINTERS BY CHARLES FERIS Many stories can be told of how we got our first inspiration to pursue this hobby of ours, this highpointing. We’ve been inspired in a hundred ways; mine arose during a period of boredom, while in college. Seeking something other than study, I took out a Rand McNally road atlas, and looked at a map of my native state of Illinois, noting the little red dot in the northwest corner of the state. Wow, something neat to do. So while the other kids were off to Florida, off to Charles Mound I went during spring break 1961. Then it hit me; I had already done Mt. Whitney the year before, so why not do all the states. Now I was really excited. The next few years saw me collecting 13 more highpoints in the Midwest and southeast. I went my merry way, never realizing that others might be crazy enough to be pursuing the very same project. At this point I was not aware of the tiny fraternity of early highpointers who were already years before me. I had no idea of the remarkable people I was about to meet. Then in August 1965 a Sierra Club friend of mine in Chicago told me about C. Rowland Stebbins. I had found a kindred soul, one who had already completed the 48. I phoned him immediately. Soon my wife and I were off on the four hour drive to Lansing, Michigan. We arrived to an expansive mansion on Moore’s River Drive atop a bluff overlooking the Grand River.
  • Updating Boundaries for Large Water Bodies of the Coteau Des Prairies Using Landsat 8

    Updating Boundaries for Large Water Bodies of the Coteau Des Prairies Using Landsat 8

    UPDATING BOUNDARIES FOR LARGE WATER BODIES OF THE COTEAU DES PRAIRIES USING LANDSAT 8 South Dakota State University Landsat 8 drawing. Credit: NASA Department of Geography – Bruce V. Millett A BSTRACT M ETHODS R E S U L T S / C ONCLUSIONS Large lakes and wetland boundaries of the Coteau des Prairies and There were three main data elements used to create this map. The assembly of the map components began with coordinate system. surrounding region have changed since the National Wetlands 1. Digital Elevation Model All map coverages were projected to USA Contiguous Albers Equal Inventory (NWI) dataset was developed approximately 30 years ago. 2. National Wetlands Inventory Area Conic USGS version. This was further customized adjusting the Landsat 8, a NASA and USGS collaboration, acquires global moderate- 3. Landsat 8 data. Central Meridian to: -97.5°, Standard Parallel 1 to 29.5°, Standard resolution measurements in the visible, near-infrared, short wave, and Parallel 2 to 45.5°, and the Latitude of Origin to 23.0°. thermal infrared. Boundary limits for large water bodies were updated using 2016 Landsat 8 imagery with less than ten percent cloud cover. The mosaicked 1/3 arc-second DEM resulted in a cell resolution 10 Unsupervised and supervised classification methods were used to 1. Digital Elevation Model meters. extract water features from Landsat 8 imagery using ArcGIS Pro Imagery tools. Extracted polygon features were manually edited and • 30 National Elevation Dataset Clipped NWI data provided a total of 1,652,089 basins within the study overlaid with the NWI dataset. A final map was created by overlaying (NED) 1/3 arc-second DEMs area.
  • Cultural Heritage Form

    Cultural Heritage Form

    This form may be used to document and initially record traditional cultural properties, sacred sites, and/or sites of cultural and religious significance to tribes or other groups. The form is not a formal determination of significance by Federal, Tribal, or State officials. Revised July 2013 CULTURAL HERITAGE FORM Revised July 2013 The Cultural Heritage Form may be used to document and initially record traditional cultural properties, sacred sites, and / or sites of cultural and religious significance to tribes or other groups. This form is not a formal determination of significance by Federal, Tribal, or State officials. The Cultural Heritage Form is not required by the North Dakota State Historic Preservation Office (NDSHPO) or the State Historical Society of North Dakota (SHSND). The Cultural Heritage Form is not a substitute for the North Dakota Cultural Resource Survey (NDCRS) archaeological, architectural, and historical archaeological site forms. Locations identified and recorded on the Cultural Heritage Form will not be assigned a formal Smithsonian Institution Trinomial System (SITS) site number. THE CULTURAL HERITAGE FORM Temporary Number: If needed, a temporary identification number used by the Recorder. Identification Number: A permanent identification number. Corresponding SITS# (if applicable): If the site also is recorded with the North Dakota Cultural Resource Survey (NDCRS), provide the corresponding Smithsonian Institutional Trinomial System (SITS) number for cross-reference. Map Quad(s): The name(s) of the USGS 7.5' topographic quadrangle(s) on which the site is plotted. Legal Description LTL: Due to surveyor errors made during the platting of the state of North Dakota, certain areas of Richland and Sargent counties contain township numbers that are duplicated within the Sisseton-Wahpeton Dakota Nation.
  • Black Hills National Forest

    Black Hills National Forest

    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Black Hills Mountain Region Black Hills National National Forest Forest Custer South Dakota March 2006 Land and Resource Management Plan 1997 Revision Phase II Amendment LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS ACHP President’s Advisory Council on MMBF Million Board Feet Historic Preservation MMCF Million Cubic Feet A.F.F. Agricultural, Forestry, and Fishing MOU Memorandum of Understanding Services MPB Mountain Pine Beetle AMP Allotment Management Plan NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality AOI Annual Operating Instructions Standards ARC At-risk Communities NEPA National Environmental Policy Act ASQ Allowable Sale Quantity NF National Forest ATV All Terrain Vehicle NFMA National Forest Management Act AUM Animal Unit Month NFP National Fire Plan BA Botanical Areas NFPA National Forest Protection BA Biological Assessment Association BBC Birds of Conservation Concern NFS National Forest System BBS Breeding Bird Survey National Register National Register of Historic Places BCR Bird Conservation Regions NIC Non-Interchangeable Component BE Biological Evaluation NOA Notice of Availability BHNF Black Hills National Forest NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Black Hills Black Hills Ecoregion Administration BLM Bureau of Land Management NOI Notice of Intent BMP Best Management Practices NWCG National Wildland Fire Coordinating BOR Bureau of Recreation Group BTU British Thermal Unit OHV Off Highway Vehicle CEQ Council on Environmental Quality PCPI Per Capita Personal Income CF Cubic Feet PIF Partners
  • The Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Interval in Badlands National Park, South Dakota

    The Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Interval in Badlands National Park, South Dakota

    The Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Interval in Badlands National Park, South Dakota Philip W. Stoffer1 Paula Messina John A. Chamberlain, Jr. Dennis O. Terry, Jr. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 01-56 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The Cretaceous/Tertiary (K-T) boundary study interval at the Rainbow Colors Overlook along Badlands Loop Road, North Unit of Badlands National Park. This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 http://geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/open-file/of01-056/ ABSTRACT A marine K-T boundary interval has been identified throughout the Badlands National Park region of South Dakota. Data from marine sediments suggest that deposits from two asteroid impacts (one close, one far away) may be preserved in the Badlands. These impact- generated deposits may represent late Maestrichtian events or possibly the terminal K-T event. Interpretation is supported by paleontological correlation, sequence stratigraphy, magnetostratigraphy, and strontium isotope geochronology. This research is founded on nearly a decade of NPS approved field work in Badlands National Park and a foundation of previously published data and interpretations. The K-T boundary occurs within
  • Eriogonum Visheri A

    Eriogonum Visheri A

    Eriogonum visheri A. Nelson (Visher’s buckwheat): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project December 18, 2006 Juanita A. R. Ladyman, Ph.D. JnJ Associates LLC 6760 S. Kit Carson Cir E. Centennial, CO 80122 Peer Review Administered by Center for Plant Conservation Ladyman, J.A.R. (2006, December 18). Eriogonum visheri A. Nelson (Visher’s buckwheat): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/ projects/scp/assessments/eriogonumvisheri.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The time spent and help given by all the people and institutions listed in the reference section are gratefully acknowledged. I would also like to thank the North Dakota Parks and Recreation Department, in particular Christine Dirk, and the South Dakota Natural Heritage Program, in particular David Ode, for their generosity in making their records, reports, and photographs available. I thank the Montana Natural Heritage Program, particularly Martin Miller, Mark Gabel of the Black Hills University Herbarium, Robert Tatina of the Dakota Wesleyan University, Christine Niezgoda of the Field Museum of Natural History, Carrie Kiel Academy of Natural Sciences, Dave Dyer of the University of Montana Herbarium, Caleb Morse of the R.L. McGregor Herbarium, Robert Kaul of the C. E. Bessey Herbarium, John La Duke of the University of North Dakota Herbarium, Joe Washington of the Dakota National Grasslands, and Doug Sargent of the Buffalo Gap National Grasslands - Region 2, for the information they provided. I also appreciate the access to files and assistance given to me by Andrew Kratz, Region 2 USDA Forest Service, and Chuck Davis, U.S.
  • ST. CHARLES 7.5' QUADRANGLE Qslt 0 5 4 ST

    ST. CHARLES 7.5' QUADRANGLE Qslt 0 5 4 ST

    90°22'30"W 90°30'00"W 90°27'30"W 90°25'00"W R 5 E R 6 E 38°52'30"N 38°52'30"N 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 35 SURFICIAL MATERIAL GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE ST. CHARLES 7.5' QUADRANGLE Qslt 0 5 4 ST. CHARLES AND ST. LOUIS COUNTIES, MISSOURI 0 45 Qslt 2 Geology and Digital Compilation by 0 45 Qtd David A. Gaunt and Bradley A. Mitchell Qcly «¬94 3 5 6 5 4 2011 Qslt Qtd Qtd Qtd 1 Graus «¬94 Lake OFM-11-593-GS 6 «¬H Qtd 6 Croche 9 10 MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 8 7 s DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND LAND SURVEY ai ar 7 M GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROGRAM Qslt Qtd P.O. BOX 250, ROLLA MO 65402-0250 12 www.dnr.mo.gov/geology B «¬ Qslt 573-368-2100 7 13 THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED UNDER A COOPERATIVE 0 5 AGREEMENT WITH THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL 4 18 38°50'00"N 38°50'00"N SURVEY Qtd Permission must be obtained to visit privately owned land Qslt Qslt PHYSIOGRAPHY 0 5 4 St. Charles County D St. Louis County The St. Charles quadrangle includes part of the large floodplain of the Missouri River and loess covered uplands. N 500 550 A L The floodplain is up to five miles wide in this area. The quadrangle lies within the Dissected Till Plains Section 50 S 5 I 45 6 0 0 0 of the Central Lowland Province of the Interior Plains Physiographic Division.