DOCSLIB.ORG

In a Single Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In a Single Document CORN ETHANOL AND WILDLIFE: HOW ARE POLICY- AND MARKET-DRIVEN INCREASES IN CORN PLANTINGS AFFECTING HABITAT AND WILDLIFE? By: Rebecca Brooke Gregory Fogel Aviva Glaser Elizabeth Griffin Kristen Johnson A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science of Natural Resources and Environment at the University of Michigan April 2009 Faculty advisors: Professor Michael Moore Professor Steven Yaffee Abstract Since 2005, government incentives have driven massive growth in the corn ethanol industry, increasing demand for corn for ethanol by 200%. Corn prices have risen to reflect increased demand, and farmers have responded by planting more acres of corn. The amount of corn planted in the United States grew by 12 million acres from 2005 to 2008. New acres for corn have come from crop switching, loss of conservation program land, and native prairie conversion, all of which affect habitat quantity and quality. This study used GIS software to map “hotspots” of corn plantings and habitat loss in the Prairie Pothole Region of four Midwestern states: Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota. These maps informed a statistical analysis that quantifies grassland bird population changes in areas experiencing high increases in corn plantings. A review of current legislation and market data revealed that government incentives are the main driver of corn ethanol expansion. We interviewed over 30 conservation practitioners to assess the potential of federal and state conservation policies and programs to mitigate the adverse effects of increased corn plantings on habitat and wildlife. Our results show that dramatic loss of habitat is occurring in the ecologically unique Prairie Pothole Region, and that populations of sensitive bird species are declining significantly in hotspots in this area. Principal among our recommendations is that government incentives for corn ethanol production be reduced; in particular, we recommend a reduction in blending requirements, which drive demand for corn ethanol. Unless changes are made, corn plantings for ethanol production will continue to expand until at least 2015, resulting in further declines of sensitive wildlife populations in one of the nation’s most ecologically important regions. ii Acknowledgements This project’s success is due to numerous individuals who generously offered their time, expertise, and support. We would like to thank Julie Sibbing and the National Wildlife Federation for providing much-needed guidance and a venue for our research findings. We also wish to thank our advisors, Professors Michael Moore and Steve Yaffee for their direction and valuable feedback throughout the length of the project. Thanks to Professor Johannes Foufopolous for his support and willingness to meet for hours on end, to Professor Bobbi Low for her enthusiasm and research guidance, and to Bobbi Lab for providing helpful feedback on our methodology. This project would not have been possible without funding from the Education Fund of America and resources provided by SNRE Technical Support and Office of Academic Programs. Particular thanks to Judy Byington, Kim LeClair, and Sondra Auerbach for their constant smiles and help. We owe a special thanks to the numerous practitioners from agencies and organizations who offered their time and expertise during interviews. We greatly appreciate their insight, willingness to talk, and tremendous commitment to protecting natural resources. We would especially like to thank Scott Stephens and Johann Walker at Ducks Unlimited for welcoming us to North Dakota and answering our questions throughout the length of the project. iii Table of Contents List of Figures v List of Tables vii List of Maps ix List of Acronyms xi Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1: Introduction 3 Chapter 2: U.S. Corn Ethanol Industry Overview 19 Chapter 3: Habitat and Environmental Impacts of Corn Production 29 Chapter 4: Federal Conservation Programs 39 Chapter 5: Four-State Focal Area 57 Chapter 6: Wildlife Populations 73 Chapter 7: Iowa State Profile 97 Chapter 8: Minnesota State Profile 121 Chapter 9: North Dakota State Profile 143 Chapter 10: South Dakota State Profile 163 Chapter 11: Four-State Comparison 185 Chapter 12: Conclusions and Recommendations 195 Citations 211 iv List of Figures Figure 1.1: Diagram of Study System Figure 1.2: U.S. Corn Ethanol Production Capacity Figure 1.3: Average U.S. Corn Price Figure 1.4: Total U.S. Corn Acres Planted 1979-2009 Figure 1.5: Research Questions and Methodology Figure 2.1: Corn Ethanol Value Chain Figure 2.2: System Diagram of Federal Corn Ethanol Laws, Incentives, and Programs Figure 4.1: System Diagram of Federal Conservation Policies and Programs Figure 5.1: U.S. Ethanol Production Capacity Figure 5.2: Total Corn Plantings 1998 to 2008 Figure 5.3: CRP Enrollment, 1999 to January 2009 Figure 6.1: Average Number of Indicator Species Sighted on Low Corn Increase versus High Corn Increase Routes Figure 6.2: Average Number of Indicator Species Sighted on Low Change versus High Change Routes Figure 6.3: Average Number of Indicator Bird Counts in Low Corn Increase versus High Corn Increase Routes Figure 6.4: Agricultural Intensity and Land-Use Category Figure 6.5: Average Number of Indicator Bird Counts in Low Change versus High Change Routes Figure 6.6: Average Number of Insensitive Species Sighted on Low Corn Increase vs High Corn Increase Routes Figure 6.7: Average Number of Insensitive Species Sighted in Low Change vs High Change Routes Figure 6.8: Average Number of Insensitive Bird Sightings in Low Corn Increase versus High Corn Increase Routes Figure 6.9: Average Number of Insensitive Bird Sightings in Low Change vs High Change Routes Figure 6.10: Western Meadowlark Population Change and Change Index Figure 6.11: Western Meadowlark Population Change and Corn Increase v Figure 6.12: Average Number of Western Meadowlarks in Low Corn Increase versus High Corn Increase Routes Figure 7.1: Land Ownership in Iowa Figure 7.2: Top 5 Crops and CRP in Iowa Figure 7.3: System Diagram of Corn Ethanol Laws, Incentives, and Programs in Iowa Figure 7.4: System Diagram of Conservation Policies and Programs in Iowa Figure 8.1: Land Ownership in Minnesota Figure 8.2: Top 5 Crops and CRP in Minnesota Figure 8.3: System Diagram of Corn Ethanol Laws, Incentives, and Programs in Minnesota Figure 8.4: System Diagram of Conservation Policies and Programs in Minnesota Figure 9.1: Land Ownership in North Dakota Figure 9.2: Top 5 Crops and CRP in North Dakota Figure 9.3: System Diagram of Corn Ethanol Laws, Incentives, and Programs in North Dakota Figure 9.4: System Diagram of Conservation Policies and Programs in North Dakota Figure 10.1: Land Ownership in South Dakota Figure 10.2: Top 5 Crops and CRP in South Dakota Figure 10.3: System Diagram of Corn Ethanol Laws, Incentives, and Programs in South Dakota Figure 10.4: System Diagram of Conservation Policies and Programs in South Dakota vi List of Tables Table 1.1: Corn Acres Used for Ethanol Production Table 1.2: Major crop prices received by farmers ($/bu) Table 1.3: State-Level Interviews Table 2.1: Historic U.S. Ethanol Refineries and Capacity Table 2.2: Renewable Fuel Standard Table 3.1: Historic Environmental Impacts of Corn Ethanol Production Table 3.2: Herbicide Use on Corn (2005) Table 3.3: Projected Environmental Impacts of Corn Ethanol Production Table 4.1: Farm Bill Conservation Programs Table 4.2: Conservation Reserve Program: USDA Farm Service Agency Table 4.3: Wetland Reserve Program: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Table 4.4: Environmental Quality Incentives Program: USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service Table 4.5: Wildlife Habitat Incentive Program: USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service Table 4.6: Conservation Stewardship Program (Formerly the Conservation Security Program) USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service Table 4.7: Conservation Technical Assistance: USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service Table 4.8: Farm Protection Program USDA: Natural Resources Conservation Service, Farm Service Agency, & Forest Service Table 4.9: Grassland Reserve Program USDA: Natural Resources Conservation Service Table 4.10: State Wildlife Grants: US Fish and Wildlife Service and State Fish and Wildlife Agencies Table 5.1: Average Changes in U.S. Corn Plantings, 1980s to 2000s Table 5.2: CRP Acreage Enrolled in Region, 2007-2009 Table 5.3: Top 5 Herbicides and Top 4 Insecticides Used on Corn in Study States, 2005 Table 5.4: Percent of Corn Acres Treated With Fertilizer (2005) Table 5.5: Water Usage by Crop (inches/week) Table 6.1: Indicator Species Correlations and Regressions Table 7.1: Iowa Biorefinery Locations and Capacities vii Table 7.2: Iowa Ethanol Incentives, Laws and Regulations Table 7.3: Federally Funded and Implemented Programs in Iowa Table 7.4: Federally Funded and State Implemented Programs in Iowa Table 7.5: State Funded and Implemented Programs in Iowa Table 8.1: Minnesota Biorefinery Locations and Capacities Table 8.2: Minnesota Ethanol Incentives, Laws, and Regulations Table 8.3: Ecological Profiles of Minnesota PPR Subsections Table 8.4: Federally Funded and Implemented Programs in Minnesota Table 8.5: Federally Funded and State Implemented Programs in Minnesota Table 8.6: State Funded and Implemented Programs in Minnesota Table 9.1: North Dakota Biorefinery Locations and Capacities Table 9.2: North Dakota Ethanol Incentives, Laws, and Regulations Table 9.3: North Dakota Species of Conservation Concern in the PPR Table 9.4: Federally
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Preliminary Survey of the Bird Life of North Dakota
    UNIVERSITY OP MICHIGAN MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY Miscellaneous Publications No. 10 A Preliminary Survey of the Bird Life of North Dakota BY NORMAN A. WOOD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY JULY 2, 1923 OUTLINE MAP OF NORTH DAKOTA UNIVERSI'rY OF hlICHIGAN MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY Miscellaneous Publications No. 10 A Preliminary Survey of the Bird Life of North Dakota RY NORMAN A. WOOD ANN ARBOR, MICIIIGAN PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY JULY 2, I923 The publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigart, consist of two series-the Occasional Papers and the Miscellaneous PubK- cations. Both series were founded bv Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Bradsl~aw I-I. Swales and Dr. W. W. Newcomb. The Occasional Papers, publication of which was begun in 1913, j-rve as a medium for the publication of brief oriqinal papers based principally upon the collections in the Museum. The papers are issued separately to libraries and specialists, and, when a sufficient nu~uberof pages have l~crn printed to make a volume, a title page, index, and table of contents are sup- plied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list for the entire series. The Miscellaneous Publications include papers on field and museum technique, monographic studies and other papers not within the scope of the Occasional Papers. The papers are published separately, and, as it is not intended that they shall be grouped into volumes, each number has a title page and, when necessary, a table of contents. ALEXANDERG. RUTHITEN, Director of the Museum of Zoology, [Jniversity ~f Michigan. A PRELIMINARY SURVEY OF THE BIRD LIFE OF NORTH DAKOTA The field studies upon which this paper is largely based were carried on during the summers of 1920 and 1921.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY and GROUND WATER RESOURCE S of Stutsman County, North Dakota
    North Dakota Geological Survey WILSON M. LAIRD, State Geologis t BULLETIN 41 North Dakota State Water Conservation Commission MILO W . HOISVEEN, State Engineer COUNTY GROUND WATER STUDIES 2 GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER RESOURCE S of Stutsman County, North Dakota Part I - GEOLOG Y By HAROLD A. WINTERS GRAND FORKS, NORTH DAKOTA 1963 This is one of a series of county reports which wil l be published cooperatively by the North Dakota Geological Survey and the North Dakota State Water Conservation Commission in three parts . Part I is concerned with geology, Part II, basic data which includes information on existing well s and test drilling, and Part III which will be a study of hydrology in the county . Parts II and III will be published later and will be distributed a s soon as possible . CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Acknowledgments 3 Previous work 5 GEOGRAPHY 5 Topography and drainage 5 Climate 7 Soils and vegetation 9 SUMMARY OF THE PRE-PLEISTOCENE STRATIGRAPHY 9 Precambrian 1 1 Paleozoic 1 1 Mesozoic 1 1 PREGLACIAL SURFICIAL GEOLOGY 12 Niobrara Shale 1 2 Pierre Shale 1 2 Fox Hills Sandstone 1 4 Fox Hills problem 1 4 BEDROCK TOPOGRAPHY 1 4 Bedrock highs 1 5 Intermediate bedrock surface 1 5 Bedrock valleys 1 5 GLACIATION OF' NORTH DAKOTA — A GENERAL STATEMENT 1 7 PLEISTOCENE SEDIMENTS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED LANDFORMS 1 8 Till 1 8 Landforms associated with till 1 8 Glaciofluvial :materials 22 Ice-contact glaciofluvial sediments 2 2 Landforms associated with ice-contact glaciofluvial sediments 2 2 Proglacial fluvial sediments 2 3 Landforms associated with proglacial fluvial sediments 2 3 Lacustrine sediments 2 3 Landforms associated with lacustrine sediments 2 3 Other postglacial sediments 2 4 ANALYSIS OF THE SURFICIAL TILL IN STUTSMAN COUNTY 2 4 Leaching and caliche 24 Oxidation 2 4 Stone counts 2 5 Lignite within till 2 7 Grain-size analyses of till _ 2 8 Till samples from hummocky stagnation moraine 2 8 Till samples from the Millarton, Eldridge, Buchanan and Grace Cit y moraines and their associated landforms _ .
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3, District Resources and Description
    CHAPTER 3— District Resources and Description Bridgette Flanders-Wanner / USFWS / Bridgette Flanders-Wanner Grasslands in the Millerdale Waterfowl Production Area. The three wetland management districts manage smaller temporary and seasonal wetlands that draw thousands of noncontiguous tracts of Federal land breeding duck pairs to South Dakota and other parts totaling 1,136,965 acres: 100,094 acres of WPAs and of the Prairie Pothole Region. 1,036,871 acres of conservation easements. This chap­ ter describes the physical environment and biological CLIMATE CHANGE resources of these district lands, as well as fire and In January 2001, the Department of the Interior is­ grazing history, cultural resources, visitor services, sued Order 3226, requiring its Federal agencies with socioeconomic environment, and district operations. land management responsibilities to consider potential climate change effects as part of long-range planning endeavors. The U.S. Department of Energy’s report, “Carbon Sequestration Research and Development,” 3.1 Physical Environment concluded that ecosystem protection is important to carbon sequestration and may reduce or prevent loss The districts are located in central and eastern South of carbon currently stored in the terrestrial biosphere. Dakota from west of the Missouri River to the Minnesota The report defines carbon sequestration as “the capture state line, and from the North Dakota border roughly and secure storage of carbon that would otherwise be two-thirds of the way south to the state line of Nebraska. emitted to or remain in the atmosphere.” The increase The prairies of South Dakota have become an eco­ of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the earth’s atmosphere has logical treasure of biological importance for water­ been linked to the gradual rise in surface temperature fowl and other migratory birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Conservation Plan Huron Wetland Management District Madison Wetland Management District Sand Lake Wetland Management District South Dakota
    Comprehensive Conservation Plan Huron Wetland Management District Madison Wetland Management District Sand Lake Wetland Management District South Dakota January 2012 Approved by Stephen D. Guertin, Regional Director Date U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6 Lakewood, Colorado Prepared by Huron Wetland Management District Room 309 Federal Building 200 Fourth Street SW. Huron, South Dakota 57350 605 / 352 5894 Madison Wetland Management District 23520 SD Highway 19 Madison, South Dakota 57042 605 / 256 2974 Sand Lake Wetland Management District 39650 Sand Lake Drive Columbia, South Dakota 57433 605 / 885 6320 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 6, Mountain–Prairie Region Division of Refuge Planning 134 Union Boulevard, Suite 300 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 303 / 236 8145 CITATION for this document: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012. Comprehensive conservation plan: Huron Wetland Management District, Madison Wetland Management District, and Sand Lake Wetland Management District, South Dakota. Lakewood, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 260 p. Comprehensive Conservation Plan Huron Wetland Management District Madison Wetland Management District Sand Lake Wetland Management District South Dakota Submitted by Concurred with by Clarke Dirks Date Richard A. Coleman, Ph.D. Date Project Leader Assistant Regional Director Huron Wetland Management District U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6 Huron, South Dakota National Wildlife Refuge System Lakewood, Colorado Natoma Buskness Date Paul Cornes Date Project Leader Refuge Supervisor Madison Wetland Management District U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6 Madison, South Dakota National Wildlife Refuge System Lakewood, Colorado Harris Hoistad Date Project Leader Sand Lake National Wildlife Refuge Complex Columbia, South Dakota Contents Summary .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Dakota State Research Guide Family History Sources in the Peace Garden State
    North Dakota State Research Guide Family History Sources in the Peace Garden State North Dakota History The first Europeans in the area arrived the last part of the eighteenth century and were fur traders employed by the Missouri Fur Company. The peopling of the area quickly followed the first exploration with settlements in Selkirk Colony, on the Red and Assiniboine rivers, and the Pembina settlement. Both were established in 1812, but conditions were so difficult that by 1823 Selkirk had become part of the Hudson Bay Company settlement and Pembina had been abandoned. The indigenous tribes of the Dakotas were the Mandans and Arikaras. Eastern tribes that were moved into the area included Hidatsas, Crows, Cheyennes, Creeks, Assiniboines, Yanktonai Dakotas, Teton Dakotas, and Chippewas. The smallpox epidemics in 1782 and 1786 wiped out three-fourths of the Mandans and half of the Hidatsas. The epidemic of 1837, probably introduced by the white fur traders, also had a devastating effect on the native population. Composing the largest settlement at the Red River were the “half-breeds” (called métis) who were the offspring of European fathers (French, Canadian, Scottish, and English) and Native American mothers (Chippewa, Creek, Assiniboine). Many area residents claimed French-Chippewa ancestry. By 1850 more than half of the five to six thousand people living at Fort Garry were métis, with a large percentage being Canadian- born. Settlers began moving into the region in 1849 with the organization of Minnesota Territory and the settlement of Iowa and Minnesota. This immigration brought a number of settlers to southeastern Dakota. Dakota Territory was created by an act of Congress on 2 March 1861 from the area that had previously been Nebraska and Minnesota territories.
    [Show full text]
  • Meandering Water in the Prairie Pothole Region of South Dakota and Its Economic Impact
    Meandering water in the prairie pothole region of South Dakota and its economic impact Matthew Elliott South Dakota State University [email protected] Tong Wang South Dakota State University [email protected] Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the 2016 Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, July 31st-August 2nd Copyright 2016 by Matthew Elliott and Tong Wang. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. Abstract This study estimates the economic impact of surface water changes in the prairie pothole region (PPR) of South Dakota. Flooding of wetlands and the formation of larger lakes has been documented in this region after 1993. To analyze the land cover change related to climate, or drainage, we examine Landsat 5 satellite data, 30 meter digital elevation model (DEM), the National Hydrology Dataset (NHD), the National Land Cover Database (NLCD), and the NRCS soil survey (SSURGO) using linear discriminant analysis. The changes in surface water, cropland, and grassland acres for 5 counties will be measured in northeast South Dakota between 1990 and 2010. These measurements will identify the area lost and gained for potential agriculture revenue given soil types, historical weather, topography, management characteristics, etc. The agriculture production potential will be estimated by simulation given the location and characteristics of the lost or gained acres utilizing the APEX model. Findings include the net acres lost/gained from cropland and grassland production, and the estimated average revenue potential of grassland and cropland acres inundated, or drained, during the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the Dakotas
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2020 Fishes of the Dakotas Kathryn Schlafke South Dakota State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Schlafke, Kathryn, "Fishes of the Dakotas" (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3942. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/3942 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FISHES OF THE DAKOTAS BY KATHRYN SCHLAFKE A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science Major in Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Specialization in Fisheries Science South Dakota State University 2020 ii THESIS ACCEPTANCE PAGE Kathryn Schlafke This thesis is approved as a creditable and independent investigation by a candidate for the master’s degree and is acceptable for meeting the thesis requirements for this degree. Acceptance of this does not imply that the conclusions reached by the candidate are necessarily the conclusions of the major department. Brian Graeb, Ph.D. Advisor Date Michele R. Dudash Department Head Date Dean, Graduate School Date iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank my advisors throughout this project, Dr. Katie Bertrand and Dr. Brian Graeb for giving me the opportunity to work towards a graduate degree at South Dakota State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Hod Chapter 1
    The Grassland Setting 1 CHAPTER 1 The Grassland Setting THE STORY OF NORTH DAKOTA begins with geology. Invasions of a great salt sea laid down the strata in which oil and other mineral deposits are found, and, later, fresh-water rivers formed strata containing lignite beds. Erosion, caused by wind, water, and glacial ice sheets, shaped the surface of the land, leaving what is now North Dakota as part of two significant physiographic provinces of North America: the Central Lowlands and the Great Plains. Within the state, the Central Lowlands Province is subdivided into the Drift Prairie and the Red River Valley and is separated from the Great Plains Province by the Missouri Escarpment. Thus divided into three distinct regions, North Dakota is a rather 2 History of North Dakota large state, a rectangle some 335 miles from east to west and 210 miles north to south, with an area of 70,665 square miles. It is located at the center of the continent, roughly 1,500 miles from the Atlantic Ocean and also from the Pacific, and about the same distance from the Gulf of Mexico and the Arctic Archipelago. GEOLOGY The Williston Basin, a saucer-like depression in the igneous granite crust of the earth's surface, had its origin half a billion years ago when the granite crust began to sink, a process which continued several million years. It now extends over some 130,000 square miles, about 50,000 square miles of which underlie North Dakota. The basin reaches from eastern North Dakota (Devils Lake and Jamestown are near its eastern edge) into Montana, and from northwestern South Dakota into Manitoba and Saskatchewan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Souris River Study Unit
    The Souris River Study Unit.................................................................................11.1 Description of the Souris River Study Unit ......................................................11.1 Physiography ................................................................................................ 11.6 Drainage ....................................................................................................... 11.6 Climate.......................................................................................................... 11.7 Landforms and Soils..................................................................................... 11.8 Floodplains ............................................................................................... 11.8 Terraces .................................................................................................... 11.9 Valley Walls.............................................................................................. 11.9 Alluvial Fans........................................................................................... 11.10 Upland Plains ......................................................................................... 11.10 Flora and Fauna ......................................................................................... 11.10 Other Natural Resource Potential............................................................... 11.11 Overview of Previous Archeological Work .....................................................11.12 Inventory
    [Show full text]
  • Ndstudies.Gov
    Volume 11, Issue 1 NORTH DAKOTA STUDIES A Program of the State Historical Society of North Dakota • Winter 2019 Speaking of History By Barbara Handy-Marchello, Ph.D. sing maps to teach North Dakota Studies is one of the best ways to Uenable students to fully understand concepts related to geography and major historical events. Because geography has often been neglected in elementary and high school curricula, many students in college classes can seldom identify even the most basic geographic sites. Many students cannot identify significant geographic locations relevant to their own local and state history, yet they are expected to know global sites. NORTH DAKOTA STUDIES Using Maps To Teach North Dakota Studies There are many types of maps including political, physical, topographic, resource, and road maps. For the purposes of this article, the emphasis will be on political and physical maps. Political maps primarily focus on the state, territory, and national boundaries of a place, but also have historical value. Physical maps document landscape features of a place and generally show things like mountains, rivers, and lakes. In the classroom, maps are found in standard texts or projected from support technology. In teaching about the settlement of North Dakota, for example, teachers can use maps found at ndstudies.gov to demonstrate how the railroads impacted where immigrants settled in In 1801, a Blackfoot named Ac ko mok ki drew a map in the snow or dirt for Peter Fidler of the Hudson’s Bay Company. Hudson’s Bay Company Archives, T11048 North Dakota. When teaching about North Ac ko mok ki Map—1801 One of Fidler’s mapmakers was a Dakota’s geography and history, When the United States acquired the Blackfoot named Ac ko mok ki, or maps enhance student activities Louisiana Purchase, few people knew “The Feathers” in English.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 9 the Opening of the Missouri Plateau
    174 History of North Dakota CHAPTER 9 The Opening of the Missouri Plateau THE SETTLEMENT OF AMERICA rolled westward across the continent like a series of waves inundating the land. Frederick Jackson Turner, the renowned historian of the American frontier, vividly described the movement in his essay “The Significance of the Frontier in American History” when he wrote: “Stand at Cumberland Gap and watch the procession of civilization, marching single file–the buffalo following the trail to the salt springs, the Indian, the fur-trader and hunter, the cattle- raiser, the pioneer farmer–and the frontier has passed by. Stand at South Pass in the Rockies a century later and see the same procession with wider intervals between.” The region of which North Dakota is a part experienced similar waves in human occupation. Long before the coming of the white men, a succession of Indian migrants entered the area. White traders began to arrive late in the eighteenth century. Then the metis and the Scots brought in by Lord Selkirk occupied the Lower Red River Valley with an economy based on farming and the buffalo hunt. The next wave, pushed along by the Great Dakota Boom, carried thousands of farmers, land speculators, railroad construction workers, and townsmen–all mingled together–into the Red River Valley and the Drift Prairie. The rush and excitement of the Great Dakota Boom did not bring many white men to the Missouri Plateau. The nature of the country made a difference; occupation of the plateau presented more difficult problems of adjustment to a semiarid grassland.
    [Show full text]
  • Devils Lake Wetland Management District
    NARRATIVE REPORT for Calendar Year 1966 Devils Lake Wetland Management District Devils Lake, North Dakota Permanent Personnel Don R. Perkuchin . Refuge Manager • .. " y.V-'/ CONTENTS Pa^e I. General A. Description of the Area 1 B. Status of the Acquisition Program 1 C. Weather Conditions 2 D. Habitat Conditions 4 II. Wildlife A. Migratory Birds 5 B. Upland Game Birds g C. Other Birds 3 D. Big Game Animals g E. Fur Animals, Predators, Rodents and other Mammals g F. Rare, Endangered and Status Undermined Species g G. Fish 9 H. Reptiles and Amphibians 9 I. Disease 9 III. W.P.A. Development and Maintenance A. Physical Development 9 B. Plantings 10 C. Cultivated Crops 12 D. Collection and Receipts 12 E. Control of Vegetation 12 F. Fires 12 IV. Resource Management A. Grazing 13 B. Haying 13 C. Fur Harvest 14 V. Field Investigation or Applied Research A. Wildlife Management Studies 14 B. Biological Tinkering 14 VI. Easement Administration 14 VII. Public Relations A. Recreational Uses 15 B. Refuge Visitors 15 C. Refuge Participation ^5 D. Hunting ^5 E. Violations 15 F. Safety 17 VIII. Other Items . 17 I. GENERAL Description of the Area Ten counties in northeastern North Dakota (see Figure 1) comprise the Devils Lake Wetland Management District. All of this manage­ ment area lies north of the "Coteau du Missouri" in what we Bureau personnel refer to as the "summerfallow barrens". Nearly level deposits of glacial Lake Agassiz (now called the Red River Valley) are the predominant geological feature of the eastern one-fourth of this district.
    [Show full text]