DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 98/Monday, May 24, 2021/Notices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 98/Monday, May 24, 2021/Notices 27892 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 98 / Monday, May 24, 2021 / Notices 225. Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of 273. Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation Commission (‘‘Commission’’) Michigan 274. Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 226. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian 275. Tonto Apache Tribe 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the Community 276. Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla countervailing duty and antidumping 227. Samish Indian Tribe Indians duty orders on certain steel grating from 228. San Carlos Apache Tribe 277. Tulalip Tribes of Washington China would be likely to lead to 229. San Manual Band of Mission 278. Tule River Tribe continuation or recurrence of material Indians 279. Tunica-Biloxi Indians of Louisiana injury to an industry in the United 230. San Pasqual Band of Diegueno 280. Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk States within a reasonably foreseeable Mission Indians Indians time. 231. Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut 281. Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Tribe Indians Background 232. Santa Ynez Band of Chumash 282. Twenty-Nine Palms Band of The Commission instituted these Mission Indians Mission Indians reviews on October 1, 2020 (85 FR 233. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe 283. United Auburn Indian Community 61981) and determined on January 4, 234. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa 284. Upper Sioux Community 2021 that it would conduct expedited Indians 285. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe of reviews (86 FR 19286, April 13, 2021). 235. Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians Washington The Commission made these 236. Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 286. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe determinations pursuant to section 237. Seminole Tribe of Florida 287. U-tu-Utu-Gwaitu Paiute Tribe of 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It 238. Seneca Nation of Indians of New Benton Paiute Reservation completed and filed its determinations York 288. Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians in these reviews on May 19, 2021. The 239. Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma 289. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head views of the Commission are contained 240. Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux 290. Washoe Tribe of Nevada and in USITC Publication 5195 (May 2021), Community California entitled Certain Steel Grating from 241. Shawnee Tribe 291. White Earth Band of Chippewa China: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–465 242. Sherwood Valley Rancheria of Indians and 731–TA–1161 (Second Review). Pomo Indians 292. White Mountain Apache Tribe By order of the Commission. 243. Shingle Springs Band of Miwuk 293. Wichita and Affiliated Tribes of Indians Oklahoma Issued: May 19, 2021. 244. Shinnecock Indian Nation 294. Wilton Rancheria Lisa Barton, 245. Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe 295. Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska Secretary to the Commission. 246. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the 296. Wiyot Tribe of Table Bluff [FR Doc. 2021–10906 Filed 5–21–21; 8:45 am] Fort Hall Indian Reservation of Reservation BILLING CODE 7020–02–P Idaho 297. Wyandotte Nation of Oklahoma 247. Shoshone-Paiute Tribe of the Duck 298. Yankton Sioux Tribe Valley Indian Reservation 299. Yavapai Apache Nation of the INTERNATIONAL TRADE 248. Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Camp Verde Indian Reservation COMMISSION 300. Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe Lake Traverse Reservation [Investigation No. 337–TA–1208] 249. Skokomish Indian Tribe 301. Yerington Paiute Tribe 250. Smith River Rancheria 302. Yocha-De-He Wintun Nation Certain Electronic Devices, Including 251. Snoqualmie Tribe 303. Yurok Tribe Computers, Tablet Computers, and 252. Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians National Indian Gaming Commission. Components and Modules Thereof; 253. Sokaogon Chippewa Community E. Sequoyah Simermeyer, Commission Determination Not To 254. Southern Ute Indian Tribe Chairman. Review an Initial Determination 255. Sprite Lake Tribe Granting an Unopposed Motion To 256. Spokane Tribe of Indians Kathryn Isom-Clause, Vice Chair. Terminate the Investigation in Its 257. Squaxin Island Tribe Entirety Based Upon Settlement; Jeannie Hovland, 258. St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Termination of Investigation Wisconsin Associate Commissioner. 259. St. Regis Mohawk Tribe [FR Doc. 2021–10904 Filed 5–21–21; 8:45 am] AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 260. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe BILLING CODE 7565–02–P Commission. 261. Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians ACTION: Notice. 262. Stockbridge-Munsee Community SUMMARY: 263. Suquamish Tribe of the Port INTERNATIONAL TRADE Notice is hereby given that Madison Reservation COMMISSION the U.S. International Trade 264. Susanville Indian Rancheria Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has 265. Swinomish Indian Tribal [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–465 and 731– determined not to review an initial Community TA–1161 (Second Review)] determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 33) of the presiding administrative law judge 266. Sycuan Band of Diegueno Mission Certain Steel Grating From China Indians (‘‘ALJ’’), granting an unopposed motion 267. Table Mountain Rancheria Determinations to terminate the investigation in its entirety based upon settlement. 268. Te-Moak Tribe of Western On the basis of the record 1 developed FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shoshone Indians of Nevada in the subject five-year reviews, the 269. Thlopthlocco Tribal Town United States International Trade Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General 270. Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Counsel, U.S. International Trade Berthold Reservation 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission, 500 E Street SW, 271. Timbisha Shoshone Tribe Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 272. Tohono O’odham Nation CFR 207.2(f)). 205–3042. Copies of non-confidential VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 May 21, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM 24MYN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 98 / Monday, May 24, 2021 / Notices 27893 documents filed in connection with this without limitation, and the Commission amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part investigation may be viewed on the determined not to review the ID. Order 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) No. 5 (Sept. 4, 2020), unreviewed by Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help Comm’n Notice (Sept. 29, 2020). 210). accessing EDIS, please email On March 12, 2021, ALJ granted a By order of the Commission. motion by Nokia to terminate the [email protected]. General Issued: May 18, 2021. information concerning the Commission investigation as to (1) claims 1, 4–6, 9– Lisa Barton, may also be obtained by accessing its 13, 22, and 23 of the ’818 patent; (2) internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. claims 1, 2, 5–7, 9–13, 15, 16, 18, 21– Secretary to the Commission. Hearing-impaired persons are advised 23, 25–31, 35, 36, 39, 41–46, 48, 52, 53, [FR Doc. 2021–10856 Filed 5–21–21; 8:45 am] that information on this matter can be 56, 58–60, and 62 of the ’764 patent; (3) BILLING CODE 7020–02–P obtained by contacting the claims 1, 2–4, 6, 7, 9–13, 15, 17, 18, 20– Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone 30, 32–39, 41, 43–47, 49, 51–53, 56–60, (202) 205–1810. and 63 of the ’808 patent; (4) claims DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2–4, 6, 7, 16, 20–25, 28, and 29 of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 10, 2020, the Commission instituted this ’469 patent, (5) all the asserted claims Antitrust Division (1–16) of the ’706 patent; and (6) investigation based on a complaint filed Notice Pursuant to the National by Nokia Technologies Oy and Nokia Intervenor Google. The Commission determined not to review. Order No. 26 Cooperative Research and Production Corporation both of Espoo, Finland (Mar. 12, 2020), unreviewed by Comm’n Act of 1993—Information Warfare (collectively, ‘‘Nokia’’). 85 FR 48263–64 Notice (Mar. 30, 2020). Research Project Consortium (Aug. 10, 2020). The complaint alleged On April 22, 2021, Nokia filed a violations of section 337 based on the motion to terminate the investigation in Notice is hereby given that, on April importation into the United States, the its entirety based upon settlement. On 29, 2021, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the sale for importation, or the sale within May 3, 2021, OUII filed a response in National Cooperative Research and the United States after importation of support of the motion, and the ALJ Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 certain electronic devices, including found that the Lenovo respondents do et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Information Warfare computers, tablet computers, and not oppose the motion. ID at 1. Research Project Consortium (‘‘IWRP’’) components and modules thereof by On May 4, 2021, the Chief ALJ issued has filed written notifications reason of infringement of claims 1, 2, the subject ID (Order No. 33) granting simultaneously with the Attorney 5–7, 9–13, 15, 16, 18, 21–23, 25–29, 31, the motion. The subject ID found that General and the Federal Trade 32, 35–37, 39–47, 49, 52–54, and 56–62 the joint motion complies with Commission disclosing changes in its of U.S. Patent No. 8,144,764 (‘‘the ’764 Commission Rule 210.21(a)(2), which membership. The notifications were patent’’); claims 1–4, 6, 7, 9–13, 15–18, provides that ‘‘[a]ny party may move at filed for the purpose of extending the 20–30, 32–41, 43–49, 51–60, and 62–65 any time to terminate an investigation in Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of of U.S. Patent No. 7,532,808 (‘‘the ’808 whole or in part as to any or all antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages patent’’); claims 1–7, 9, 15, 16, 18, 20– respondents on the basis of a settlement, under specified circumstances. 25, 27–30, and 50 of U.S. Patent No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download This PDF File
    A Political Ecology of Healing 1 Elisabeth Middleton University of California, Davis, USA. The concept of historical unresolved grief has powerful implications not only for healing from our past, but for giving us the strength and commitment to save ourselves and future generations. Maria Yellow Horse Brave Heart and Lemrya DeBruyn2 1. Introduction On June 29, 2004, the Pacific and Watershed Lands Stewardship Council convened a public meeting in Chester, California, in the northeastern Sierra Nevada mountains. The Board members and staff introduced the Council's purpose—to oversee the planning and divestiture of approximately 140,000 acres (56,656 ha.) of former Pacific Gas & Electric Company land around California—and then opened the floor to public comments and suggestions. One after another, representatives from Mountain Maidu groups including the Honey Lake Maidu, the Roundhouse Council Indian Education Center, and the Maidu Cultural and Development Group, and their allies, stood up and requested the formal inclusion of a Native American representative on the Stewardship Council Board. All of the lands to be divested, and, particularly for Maidu participants, much of the 53,185 acres (21,523 ha.) within the Feather River Planning Unit lie within the Mountain Maidu homeland. To not have an official representative of Native American interests on the Board to oversee the planning efforts for these lands seemed to indicate a blatant disregard for the historical and contemporary Native presence. In his 1998 review of political ecology,
    [Show full text]
  • From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-Creation of the Tribal Identity On
    From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-creation of the Tribal Identity on the Tule River Indian Reservation in California from Euroamerican Contact to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 By Kumiko Noguchi B.A. (University of the Sacred Heart) 2000 M.A. (Rikkyo University) 2003 Dissertation Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Native American Studies in the Office of Graduate Studies of the University of California Davis Approved Steven J. Crum Edward Valandra Jack D. Forbes Committee in Charge 2009 i UMI Number: 3385709 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3385709 Copyright 2009 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Kumiko Noguchi September, 2009 Native American Studies From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-creation of the Tribal Identity on the Tule River Indian Reservation in California from Euroamerican contact to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 Abstract The main purpose of this study is to show the path of tribal development on the Tule River Reservation from 1776 to 1936. It ends with the year of 1936 when the Tule River Reservation reorganized its tribal government pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) of 1934.
    [Show full text]
  • Enrollment Update News February 2012 Proposed Changes in the Tribal Enrollment Ordinance
    [email protected] Enrollment Update News February 2012 Proposed Changes in the Tribal Enrollment Ordinance In October 2011, the Bishop Tribal Council held the 1st of a series of Pub- lic Hearings regarding proposed changes in the enrollment ordinance. The pro- posed changes would be to amend the ordinance to add new criteria such as: blood quantum, a residency clause, and having a contin- ual generational enrollment of descendents. Question: How did we arrive at Each meeting scheduled has discussed a “proposing” a blood quantum different topic. The most recent meeting on Janu- or enrollment changes? ary 25, 2012, the Bishop Tribal Council had invited On December 17, 2009 a tribal ENROLLMENT survey was taken asking if COMMITTEE representatives from the Bureau of Indian Affairs Tribal members would like to in Sacramento, California to give a presentation include a blood quantum in the LAURINE NAPOLES and answer any questions regarding blood quan- tum and when it is used or if it is still used. The current Tribal Enrollment Ordi- RUTH CHAVEZ nance. (134 people responded) meeting with the Bureau of Indian Affairs was in- PATTY MANRIQUEZ This lead to proposed changes formative for both the Enrollment Committee and and public hearings. GERALD HOWARD the community. ROBIN HOWARD The importance of these Public Hearings is for the community to become informed and be involved in the decision making process. Hopefully, the Enrollment Committee and Department can answer some ENROLLMENT DEPARTMENT of the misconceptions that have been mentioned during the Public Hearings. (i.e., GERTRUDE BROWN, We have members coming out of the “wood works”.
    [Show full text]
  • National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) Winter Session in Washington DC- During the Week of February 11Th -14Th, 2019 Two M
    The Bishop Indian Tribal Council encourages the community to continue to stay updated with the good things happening in our community by continuing to read all of the monthly newsletter articles and attend tribal meetings. For suggestions and comments on how to improve this newsletter article contact Brian Poncho @ (760)873-3584 ext. 1220. Council Member Brian Poncho and Vice Chairman Tilford Denver with Vice Chairman Tilford Denver and Council Member Brian Poncho Representative Charice Davids (KS) after meeting with Senator Dianne Feinstein’s Office National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) Winter Session in Washington DC- During the week of February 11th -14th, 2019 two members of the BPTC attended the 2019 NCAI Executive Winter Session as representatives from the Bishop Paiute Tribe. Vice-Chairman Denver, newly appointed as a Co-Chair of the NCAI TANF Task Force lead the discussion in the TANF Taskforce meeting on Monday, February 11th. Council Member Poncho, newly elected to the NCAI Executive Board as the Pa- cific Region Vice-President participated in Executive Meetings starting Sunday February 10th and through- out the week. In between meetings and the NCAI General Sessions, both BPTC members went to Capital Hill and met with Congressional Leaders as well as Senior Staff Members (20 offices total including our Congressmen Paul Cook) on Tribal issues affecting the Bishop Paiute Tribe. Topics included: Hunting and Fishing Rights, Tribal Police Concerns with Inyo County Sheriffs Department, and Tribal TANF. Vice- Chairman Denver and Council member Poncho also had a chance to meet with the Office of Tribal Justice Director Tracy Toulou (DOJ) and Deputy Solicitor Eric Shephard (DOI) specifically on issues the Tribe has with the Inyo County Sheriff Department and in getting our Tribal Police SLEC Certified.
    [Show full text]
  • Drought and Equity in California
    Drought and Equity in California Laura Feinstein, Rapichan Phurisamban, Amanda Ford, Christine Tyler, Ayana Crawford January 2017 Drought and Equity in California January 2017 Lead Authors Laura Feinstein, Senior Research Associate, Pacific Institute Rapichan Phurisamban, Research Associate, Pacific Institute Amanda Ford, Coalition Coordinator, Environmental Justice Coalition for Water Christine Tyler, Water Policy Leadership Intern, Pacific Institute Ayana Crawford, Water Policy Leadership Intern, Pacific Institute Drought and Equity Advisory Committee and Contributing Authors The Drought and Equity Advisory Committee members acted as contributing authors, but all final editorial decisions were made by lead authors. Sara Aminzadeh, Executive Director, California Coastkeeper Alliance Colin Bailey, Executive Director, Environmental Justice Coalition for Water Carolina Balazs, Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley Wendy Broley, Staff Engineer, California Urban Water Agencies Amanda Fencl, PhD Student, University of California, Davis Center for Environmental Policy and Behavior Kelsey Hinton, Program Associate, Community Water Center Gita Kapahi, Director, Office of Public Participation, State Water Resources Control Board Brittani Orona, Environmental Justice and Tribal Affairs Specialist and Native American Studies Doctoral Student, University of California, Davis Brian Pompeii, Lecturer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Tim Sloane, Executive Director, Institute for Fisheries Resources ISBN-978-1-893790-76-6 © 2017 Pacific Institute. All rights reserved. Pacific Institute 654 13th Street, Preservation Park Oakland, California 94612 Phone: 510.251.1600 | Facsimile: 510.251.2203 www.pacinst.org Cover Photos: Clockwise from top left: NNehring, Debargh, Yykkaa, Marilyn Nieves Designer: Bryan Kring, Kring Design Studio Drought and Equity in California I ABOUT THE PACIFIC INSTITUTE The Pacific Institute envisions a world in which society, the economy, and the environment have the water they need to thrive now and in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes
    National Plant Data Team August 2012 Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes and the Klamath Tribe of Oregon in the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology Collections, University of California, Berkeley August 2012 Cover photos: Left: Maidu woman harvesting tarweed seeds. Courtesy, The Field Museum, CSA1835 Right: Thick patch of elegant madia (Madia elegans) in a blue oak woodland in the Sierra foothills The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its pro- grams and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sex- ual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Acknowledgments This report was authored by M. Kat Anderson, ethnoecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Jim Effenberger, Don Joley, and Deborah J. Lionakis Meyer, senior seed bota- nists, California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Pest Diagnostics Center. Special thanks to the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum staff, especially Joan Knudsen, Natasha Johnson, Ira Jacknis, and Thusa Chu for approving the project, helping to locate catalogue cards, and lending us seed samples from their collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Central California Agency
    Tolowa Northern California Elk Valley Agency Resighini Karuk q Yurok Quartz Valley Big Lagoon Trinidad Hoopa Valley Fort Bidwell Blue Lake Pit River Tribe Northern Calif Agency Table Bluff Alturas Cedarville Rohnerville 364 Knollcrest Drive, Ste 105 Redding, CA 96002 Pit River Tribe 530-223-7960 Central CalIifD AAgeHncOy Redding Laytonville 650 Capitol Mall, Ste 8-500 Sherwood Valley Sacramento, CA 95814 916-930-3680 Redwood Valley Susanville Round Valley Coyote Valley Southern Calif Agency Pinoleville Paskenta Greenville Guidiville Grindstone 1451 Research Park Dr, Ste 100 Riverside, CA 92507 Potter Valley ! Berry Creek 951-276-6624 Robinson Mechoopda Scotts Valley Enterprise Manchester-Point Arena Upper Lake Colusa Mooretown Palm Springs Agency Hopland Elem Indian Colony PO Box 2245 Big Valley Cortina Stewarts Point Palm Springs, CA 92263 Middletown Auburn 760-416-2133 Yocha Dehe Pacific Regional Office ^ Cloverdale Koi Nation Graton Shingle Springs 2800 Cottage Way Dry Creek Washoe Sacramento, CA 95825 Wilton ^Ione 916-978-6000 Jackson Lytton Buena Vista Sheep Ranch Bridgeport Chicken Ranch Tuolumne Central California C A L I F O R N I A Western Regional Office Agency Benton Picayune North Fork Bishop Table Mountain Big Sandy Cold Springs Big Pine Timbisha Shoshone Fort Independence Santa Rosa Rancheria Lone Pine Timbisha Shoshone Tule River 0 50 100 ^Tejon Miles Santa Ynez ^ TRIBAL OFFICES TRIBAL LANDS Public Domain Allotments Palm Springs Fort Mojave Agency Datum: NAD83 Southern California San Manuel Agua Caliente The boundaries depicted on this map Santa Rosa Reservation Chemehuevi are for display purposes only. This data Morongo Twenty-Nine Palms does not address encroachments or Agency Cabazon questions of location, boundary, and area Soboba which an accurate survey may disclose.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 98/Monday, May 24, 2021/Notices
    27892 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 98 / Monday, May 24, 2021 / Notices 225. Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of 273. Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation Commission (‘‘Commission’’) Michigan 274. Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 226. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian 275. Tonto Apache Tribe 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the Community 276. Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla countervailing duty and antidumping 227. Samish Indian Tribe Indians duty orders on certain steel grating from 228. San Carlos Apache Tribe 277. Tulalip Tribes of Washington China would be likely to lead to 229. San Manual Band of Mission 278. Tule River Tribe continuation or recurrence of material Indians 279. Tunica-Biloxi Indians of Louisiana injury to an industry in the United 230. San Pasqual Band of Diegueno 280. Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk States within a reasonably foreseeable Mission Indians Indians time. 231. Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut 281. Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Tribe Indians Background 232. Santa Ynez Band of Chumash 282. Twenty-Nine Palms Band of The Commission instituted these Mission Indians Mission Indians reviews on October 1, 2020 (85 FR 233. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe 283. United Auburn Indian Community 61981) and determined on January 4, 234. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa 284. Upper Sioux Community 2021 that it would conduct expedited Indians 285. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe of reviews (86 FR 19286, April 13, 2021). 235. Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians Washington The Commission made these 236. Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 286. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe determinations pursuant to section 237.
    [Show full text]
  • Federally Recognized Indian Tribes
    Appendix C: Federally Recognized Indian Tribes The following tribal entities within the contiguous 48 states are recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. For further information contact Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Tribal Government Services, 1849 C Street N.W., Washington, DC 20240; Telephone number (202) 208-7445.1 Figure C.1 shows the location of the Federally Recognized Tribes. 1. Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 2. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California 3. Ak Chin Indian Community of Papago Indians of the Maricopa, Ak Chin Reservation, Arizona 4. Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas 5. Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town of the Creek Nation of Oklahoma 6. Alturas Rancheria of Pit River Indians of California 7. Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 8. Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming 9. Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians of Maine 10. Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana 11. Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation, California 12. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin 13. Bay Mills Indian Community of the Sault Ste. Marie Band of Chippewa Indians Bay Mills. Reservation, Michigan 14. Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 15. Big Lagoon Rancheria of Smith River Indians of California 1Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 220, November 13, 1996. C–1 Figure C.1.—Locations of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations. C–2 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Concord Hills Regional Park Park Name Selection
    Concord Hills Regional Park Park Name Selection Board Executive Committee– September 3, 2020 Devan Reiff, AICP – Principal Planner 1 Delta Location of the future Pittsburg regional park Concord Black Diamond Mines Mount Diablo 2 • Historically known names or Commonly Geographic Accepted European Place Names • Major Events, Eras, or People Associated Historic with Property • Native Place Names or Cultural Affiliated Cultural 3 Park Naming Process Name(s) Board Executive suggested Committee • Public Workshops • Surveys Board • Individual Suggestions Park Advisory Disagree Executive Committee Committee Agree Board of Directors 4 . Concord naming began with broad public input . Recommended names at park planning meetings . Four online surveys with 1,200 responses during Spring, 2020 . Executive Committee, PAC, and public interest in exploring a © Scott Hein name which recognizes native heritage and culture . Consulted with native American “Concord Hills Regional Park” tribal leaders 5 A land of many stories • Interpretive themes of occupation, war, resistance, peace • Park’s Visitor Center will tell the histories of Port Chicago, CNWS, ranching, native peoples • With National Park Service, tell stories of sailors at Port Chicago and the resistance of the “Port Chicago 50” who changed civil rights in America 6 A Land of Many Languages • Circa 1770 Bay Area • Bay Miwok • Delta Yokuts • Six Ohlone Languages • Karkin • SF Bay Costanoan • Awaswas • Mutsun • Rumsen • Chalon 7 A Land of Many Tribes 8 Tribal Association of Ramaytush Ohlone consultation California IndianWater Commission on park ConfederatedVillages of Lisjan Costanoan Rumsen Carmel naming Him.re-n of Ohlone, Bay Miwok and Plains Miwok Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan People Ione Band of Miwok Indians Ohlone IndianTribe Muwekma OhloneTribe Wilton Rancheria Wilton Rancheria 9 “Chupcan Territory Regional Park” --”Cupkan Territory Regional Park” • The Chupcan people lived in the valleys north of the Mountain and spoke Bay Miwok language.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias
    Tulsa Law Review Volume 44 Issue 2 60 Years after the Enactment of the Indian Country Statute - What Was, What Is, and What Should Be Winter 2008 The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias William Wood Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation William Wood, The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias, 44 Tulsa L. Rev. 317 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol44/iss2/1 This Native American Symposia Articles is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wood: The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villa THE TRAJECTORY OF INDIAN COUNTRY IN CALIFORNIA: RANCHERIAS, VILLAGES, PUEBLOS, MISSIONS, RANCHOS, RESERVATIONS, COLONIES, AND RANCHERIAS William Wood* 1. INTRODUCTION This article examines the path, or trajectory,1 of Indian country in California. More precisely, it explores the origin and historical development over the last three centuries of a legal principle and practice under which a particular, protected status has been extended to land areas belonging to and occupied by indigenous peoples in what is now California. The examination shows that ever since the Spanish first established a continuing presence in California in 1769, the governing colonial regime has accorded Indian lands such status.
    [Show full text]
  • Class III Gaming Compact Pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA)
    TRIBAL-STATE GAMING COMPACT BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND WILTON RANCHERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE 1 Sec. 1.0. Purposes and Objectives. 4 Sec. 2.0. Definitions. 4 Sec. 3.0. Scope of Class III Gaming Authorized. 9 Sec. 3.1. Authorized Class III Gaming. 9 Sec. 4.0. Authorized Location of Gaming Facility, Number of Gaming Devices, Cost Reimbursement, and Mitigation. 10 Sec. 4.1. Authorized Number of Gaming Devices. 10 Sec. 4.2. Authorized Gaming Facility. 10 Sec. 4.3. Special Distribution Fund. 10 Sec. 4.3.1. Use of Special Distribution Funds. 12 Sec. 4.4. Cost Reimbursement and Mitigation to Local Governments. 12 Sec. 4.5. Quarterly Payments and Quarterly Contribution Report. 13 Sec. 4.6. Exclusivity. 16 Sec. 5.0. Revenue Sharing With Non-Gaming and Limited-Gaming Tribes. 17 Sec. 5.1. Definitions. 17 Sec. 5.2. Payments to the Revenue Sharing Trust Fund or the Tribal Nation Grant Fund. 19 Sec. 5.3. Provision for Credits Related to Payments Due Under Section 5.2. 21 i Sec. 6.0. Licensing. 24 Sec. 6.1. Gaming Ordinance and Regulations. 24 Sec. 6.2. Tribal Ownership, Management, and Control of Gaming Operation. 25 Sec. 6.3. Prohibitions Regarding Minors. 25 Sec. 6.4. Licensing Requirements and Procedures. 26 Sec. 6.4.1. Summary of Licensing Principles. 26 Sec. 6.4.2. Gaming Facility. 26 Sec. 6.4.3. Gaming Employees. 30 Sec. 6.4.4. Gaming Resource Suppliers. 32 Sec. 6.4.5. Financial Sources. 35 Sec. 6.4.6. Processing Tribal Gaming License Applications.
    [Show full text]