DOCSLIB.ORG

Youth and Politics in Communist Romania (1980-1989)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Youth and Politics in Communist Romania (1980-1989) YOUTH AND POLITICS IN COMMUNIST ROMANIA (1980-1989) by Veronica Szabo Bachelor of Arts, University of Bucharest, 1999 Masters’ of Arts, University of Pittsburgh, 2003 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences This dissertation was presented by Veronica Szabo It was defended on April 30, 2012 and approved by Kathleen Blee, PhD, Distinguished Professor, Department of Sociology Mohammed Bamyeh, PhD, Professor, Department of Sociology Irina Livezeanu, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of History Dissertation Advisor: John Markoff PhD, Distinguished University Professor, Department of Sociology ii Copyright © by Veronica Szabo 2012 iii YOUTH AND POLITICS IN COMMUNIST ROMANIA (1980-1989) Veronica Szabo, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2012 My research in Romania examines the presence of politics in the everyday lives of youth in the 1980s. While most research on youth’s political opinions focuses on First World democracies, my work examines how political education took place in the tightly controlled, non-democratic context of communist Romania. I tried to understand how Romanian youth experienced politics in their everyday lives in the 1980s, under a “totalitarian-sultanistic” system. I try to answer this question by looking at three levels: the lived and remembered experience of students and their teachers, the “indoctrination” materials such textbooks and policy documents they were exposed to, and the social research from the 1980s aimed at assessing the effectiveness of their “indoctrination”. My findings show that ideological indoctrination of youth in 1980s Romania existed more as intent (Party policies) than as outcome, thus rendering the “totalitarian” frame as outdated for the analysis of everyday life. The education system and youth organizations that were supposed to do the “indoctrination work” did it an inept and ambivalent fashion, and whatever they accomplished in schools was further deconstructed in autonomous spaces of expression within family and friendship circles. Furthermore, research commissioned by youth organizations and collected in the 1980s clearly shows evidence of their failing and awareness of it among members of the regime. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEGEMENTS .......................................................................................................VIII 1.0 POLITICS OF A GENERATION.............................................................................. 1 1.1 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS........................................................ 13 1.2 RESEARCHER IDENTITY............................................................................. 18 1.3 THE STRUCTURE OF THE DISSERTATION............................................ 19 2.0 POLITICS, SCHOOLS AND TEACHERS............................................................. 22 2.1 THE ROMANIAN POLITICAL CONTEXT AND EDUCATION UNDER COMMUNISM ................................................................................................................... 22 2.2 TEACHER INTERVIEWS............................................................................... 28 2.3 SOCIAL SCIENCE TEXTBOOKS ................................................................. 42 3.0 THE EVERYDAY LIFE EXPERIENCE OF ROMANIAN YOUTH: PARENTS, FAMILY, FRIENDS................................................................................................................... 54 3.1 LENS TRANSITION: A SLOW SHIFT FROM MACRO TO MICRO ANALYSIS ON SOCIALIST EASTERN EUROPE....................................................... 54 3.2 EVERYDAY COMMUNISM IN ROMANIA ................................................ 57 3.3 THE ROMANIAN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM AS SEEN FROM THE STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE........................................................................................... 66 3.3.1 Preschool...................................................................................................... 67 v 3.3.2 Grade school................................................................................................ 67 3.3.3 High school .................................................................................................. 69 3.4 REMBERING POLITICAL EDUCATION IN THE 1980S ......................... 72 3.4.1 The influence of parents ............................................................................. 74 3.4.2 The influence of teachers and youth political organizations (the Pioneers and the Union of Communist Youth) ....................................................................... 78 3.4.2.1 The Pioneer experience ...................................................................... 84 3.4.2.2 The Union of Communist Youth experience.................................... 85 4.0 YOUTH AS RESEARCH SUBJECT IN 1980 ROMANIA ................................... 88 4.1 ROMANIAN SOCIOLOGY UNDER COMMUNISM.................................. 88 4.2 THE YOUTH RESEARCH CENTER (CENTRUL DE CERCETARI PENTRU PROBLEMELE TINERETULUI) AND ITS RESEARCH ABOUT THE UNION OF COMMUNIST YOUTH................................................................................ 92 4.3 RESEARCH DATA FROM THE COMMUNIST ERA – ISSUES OF RELIABILITY ................................................................................................................... 96 4.4 THE CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON YOUTH RESEARCH DATA ...... 101 5.0 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................... 117 APPENDIX A . RESEARCH TOPICS IN THE CENTER FOR YOUTH PROBLEMS REPORTS.................................................................................................................................. 126 BIBLIOGRAPHY..................................................................................................................... 133 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Dimensions of socialist patriotism................................................................................ 104 Table 2. The importance of loving ones’ country I .................................................................... 105 Table 3. The importance of loving ones’ country II ................................................................... 106 Table 4. The importance of loving ones’ country III.................................................................. 107 Table 5. The importance of protecting socialist property........................................................... 108 Table 6. The importance of being devoted to the socialist system ............................................. 108 Table 7. Evaluation of the efficacy of the Union of Communist Youth activity........................ 110 Table 8. Factors contributing to one’s cultural education........................................................... 111 Table 9. The effectiveness of propaganda among youth ............................................................ 112 Table 10. Deficiencies in the Union of Communist Youth leadership....................................... 114 Table 11. Research topics in the Center for Youth Problems Reports ....................................... 126 vii ACKNOWLEGEMENTS This dissertation is based on research supported by a National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Grant (0326700), two University of Pittsburgh International Studies Fund grants, a University of Pittsburgh European Union Center Summer Pre-dissertation Fellowship and a Barbara Tomczyk research grant for research in Eastern Europe. Many people have helped me along the way. First of all, I need to thank my advisor John Markoff whose incredibly broad interdisciplinary expertise inspired me to make so many interesting connections. His contagious enthusiasm and constant support kept me going. Kathleen Blee’s scholarship and her well-pointed critical comments and insights improved my work and helped me become a better scholar and researcher. Irina Livezeanu was my wonderful “Romanian oasis” in Pittsburgh, a place where I always could take comfort and find an expert guide for navigating Romanian history. Mohammed Bamyeh, Shannon Woodcock, Arpad von Klimo and the members of Modern European History Workshop at Pitt (Ana Kladnik, Narcis Tulbure, Madalina Veres, Andrew Behrendt and Adelina Stefan) provided valuable comments on my drafts. Interesting suggestions and encouragement from Maria Bucur, Padraic Kenney, Daniel Chirot and Vladimir Tismaneanu helped me in various stages of research and writing. viii Mitchell Seligson, Robert Hayden, Ilya Prizel, Jonathan Harris, Irene Frieze, Lisa Brush, and Debbie Gould read my early proposal drafts and helped me improve my research design. My fieldwork in Romania benefitted from the friendship and support of my undergraduate university advisor, Vintila Mihailescu. I also owe thanks to Marian Zulean, Doina-Olga Stefanescu, Cristian Vasile, Radu Malureanu, Sandra Bardan, and the researchers and staff at the former Center for Research on Youth (Sorin Mitulescu, Gina Anghelescu and Adrian Neacsu). I would also like to thank all former teachers, researcher and students and everyone else who was kept here anonymous for taking the time to kindly share their stories with me. Many friends and colleagues have been by my side over the years, too many for this small section, but I am particularly grateful to Veronica Lifrieri, Bianca Botea-Coulaud, Ashley
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Political Science - Romania Barbu, Daniel
    www.ssoar.info Political science - Romania Barbu, Daniel Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Sammelwerksbeitrag / collection article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Barbu, D. (2002). Political science - Romania. In M. Kaase, V. Sparschuh, & A. Wenninger (Eds.), Three social science disciplines in Central and Eastern Europe: handbook on economics, political science and sociology (1989-2001) (pp. 322-342). Berlin: Informationszentrum Sozialwissenschaften. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-281015 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de 322 Daniel Barbu Political Science - Romania1 For the social sciences at large, the rise and predicament of Romanian political science, as important an experience as it may be for Romanian academia, is a topic fated to a certain degree of obscurity. On an individual basis, Romanian scholars may seek respectability and recognition in the international scientific community, but no one would expect them to collectively set the tone for political science. And it is only fair to say that marginality is perhaps the inescapable fate of all political science enterprises in Central and Eastern Europe. For American, British, German, French, and even Italian political sciences are not only dominant, but also self-reliant and self- sufficient. Therefore, it would be more interesting to look at what Romanian political science is, rather than at what it does or tries to do.
    [Show full text]
  • Communism and Post-Communism in Romania : Challenges to Democratic Transition
    TITLE : COMMUNISM AND POST-COMMUNISM IN ROMANIA : CHALLENGES TO DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION AUTHOR : VLADIMIR TISMANEANU, University of Marylan d THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FO R EURASIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE VIII PROGRA M 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N .W . Washington, D .C . 20036 LEGAL NOTICE The Government of the District of Columbia has certified an amendment of th e Articles of Incorporation of the National Council for Soviet and East European Research changing the name of the Corporation to THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR EURASIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH, effective on June 9, 1997. Grants, contracts and all other legal engagements of and with the Corporation made unde r its former name are unaffected and remain in force unless/until modified in writin g by the parties thereto . PROJECT INFORMATION : 1 CONTRACTOR : University of Marylan d PR1NCIPAL 1NVEST1GATOR : Vladimir Tismanean u COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 81 1-2 3 DATE : March 26, 1998 COPYRIGHT INFORMATIO N Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funded by contract with the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research . However, the Council and the United States Government have the right to duplicate an d disseminate, in written and electronic form, this Report submitted to the Council under thi s Contract, as follows : Such dissemination may be made by the Council solely (a) for its ow n internal use, and (b) to the United States Government (1) for its own internal use ; (2) for further dissemination to domestic, international and foreign governments, entities an d individuals to serve official United States Government purposes ; and (3) for dissemination i n accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the United State s Government granting the public rights of access to documents held by the United State s Government.
    [Show full text]
  • REVISTA ROMÂNĂ De STUDII ELECTORALE
    Autoritatea Electorală Permanentă REVISTA ROMÂNĂ de STUDII ELECTORALE Vol. VI, nr. 2, 2018 Revista Română de Studii Electorale Publicaţie bianuală editată de Autoritatea Electorală Permanentă (continuă Revista Expert Electoral) ISSN (print): 2601-8454 ISSN (L): 2601-8454 Consiliul știinţific: Rafael López-Pintor Paul DeGregorio – Universitatea Autonomă din Madrid Pierre Garrone – Asociaţia Mondială a Organismelor Electorale Robert Krimmer – Comisia de la Veneţia Toby James – Ragnar Nurkse School of Innovation and Governance, Tallinn University of Technology Ştefan Deaconu – School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies, University of East Anglia Sergiu Mişcoiu – Universitatea din Bucureşti Daniel Barbu – Facultatea de Studii Europene, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai Marian Muhuleţ – Autoritatea Electorală Permanentă, Universitatea din București Zsombor Vajda – Autoritatea Electorală Permanentă Constantin-Florin Mituleţu-Buică – Autoritatea Electorală Permanentă – Autoritatea Electorală Permanentă Consiliul redacţional: Alexandru Radu Daniel Duţă – director editorial Andrada-Maria Mateescu – redactor-șef Bogdan Fartușnic – redactor-șef adjunct Octavian Mircea Chesaru Camelia Runceanu Realizat la Autoritatea Electorală Permanentă Str. Stavropoleos nr. 6, sector 3, Bucureşti [email protected]; [email protected] Tel/Fax: (021)310.13.86 www.roaep.ro CUPRINS Daniel BARBU – Regim şi scrutin. Cum au cristalizat alegerile din 2004 sistemul politic românesc Alexandru ......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Romania, December 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Romania, December 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: ROMANIA December 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Romania. Short Form: Romania. Term for Citizen(s): Romanian(s). Capital: Bucharest (Bucureşti). Click to Enlarge Image Major Cities: As of 2003, Bucharest is the largest city in Romania, with 1.93 million inhabitants. Other major cities, in order of population, are Iaşi (313,444), Constanţa (309,965), Timişoara (308,019), Craiova (300,843), Galati (300,211), Cluj-Napoca (294,906), Braşov (286,371), and Ploeşti (236,724). Independence: July 13, 1878, from the Ottoman Empire; kingdom proclaimed March 26, 1881; Romanian People’s Republic proclaimed April 13, 1948. Public Holidays: Romania observes the following public holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1), Epiphany (January 6), Orthodox Easter (a variable date in April or early May), Labor Day (May 1), Unification Day (December 1), and National Day and Christmas (December 25). Flag: The Romanian flag has three equal vertical stripes of blue (left), yellow, and red. Click to Enlarge Image HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early Human Settlement: Human settlement first occurred in the lands that now constitute Romania during the Pleistocene Epoch, which began about 600,000 years ago. About 5500 B.C. the region was inhabited by Indo-European people, who in turn gave way to Thracian tribes. Today’s Romanians are in part descended from the Getae, a Thracian tribe that lived north of the Danube River. During the Bronze Age (about 2200 to 1200 B.C.), these Thraco-Getian tribes engaged in agriculture, stock raising, and trade with inhabitants of the Aegean Sea coast.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extreme Right in Contemporary Romania
    INTERNATIONAL POLICY ANALYSIS The Extreme Right in Contemporary Romania RADU CINPOEª October 2012 n In contrast to the recent past of the country, there is a low presence of extreme right groups in the electoral competition of today’s Romania. A visible surge in the politi- cal success of such parties in the upcoming parliamentary elections of December 2012 seems to be unlikely. This signals a difference from the current trend in other European countries, but there is still potential for the growth of extremism in Roma- nia aligning it with the general direction in Europe. n Racist, discriminatory and intolerant attitudes are present within society. Casual intol- erance is widespread and racist or discriminatory statements often go unpunished. In the absence of a desire by politicians to lead by example, it is left to civil society organisations to pursue an educative agenda without much state-driven support. n Several prominent members of extreme right parties found refuge in other political forces in the last years. These cases of party migration make it hard to believe that the extreme views held by some of these ex-leaders of right-wing extremism have not found support in the political parties where they currently operate. The fact that some of these individuals manage to rally electoral support may in fact suggest that this happens precisely because of their original views and attitudes, rather than in spite of them. RADU CINPOEª | THE EXTREME RIGHT IN CONTEMPORARY ROMANIA Contents 1. Introduction. 3 2. Extreme Right Actors ...................................................4 2.1 The Greater Romania Party ..............................................4 2.2 The New Generation Party – Christian Democratic (PNG-CD) .....................6 2.3 The Party »Everything for the Country« (TPŢ) ................................7 2.4 The New Right (ND) Movement and the Nationalist Party .......................8 2.5 The Influence of the Romanian Orthodox Church on the Extreme Right Discourse .....8 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanian Exiles During the Most-Favored-Nation Period, 1974-1988 ______
    COLD WARRIORS IN THE AGE OF DÉTENTE AND DIFFERENTIATION: ROMANIAN EXILES DURING THE MOST-FAVORED-NATION PERIOD, 1974-1988 ____________________________________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Fullerton ____________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in History ____________________________________ By Maryam Morsali Sullivan Thesis Committee Approval: Robert McLain, Department of History, Chair Cora Granata, Department of History Bogdan Suceava, Department of Mathematics Spring Semester, 2017 ABSTRACT Throughout modern history, groups of people have emigrated without the ability to return home because of the regime in power. While living in exile, they form or join new communities. They also work to determine their role and relation to their host and home countries. This study focuses on the activities and culture of Romanian exiles in the West from 1974 to 1988. These were the years that the United States granted Most- Favored-Nation status to Nicolae Ceaușescu’s Romania. During this time, American foreign policy ranged from détente to differentiation. The culture of Romanian exiles during the Cold War developed into working to combat communism and lessen Romanian suffering, as well as serving as the voice of and preserving democratic Romania. Exiles never gave up hope that communism could be overthrown. When it became evident that their political activities could not achieve regime change, a group of Romanian exiles decided to diversify their goals. This included focusing on humanitarian aid and preserving Romanian democratic traditions. They allied with the neoconservative wing of the U.S. Congress that originated in the Democratic Party to focus more on humanitarian victories, raise awareness in the West of what they considered to be the truth about Romania, and find means to provide a threat to or weaken Ceaușescu.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Adult and Continuing Education in Romania, a Country in Transformation
    Simona Sava Trends in Adult and Continuing Education in Romania, a Country in Transformation The Plan to market transition brought with it the restructuring of the labour market, but also unemployment, new job profiles, and ongoing reform of the education sys- tem. Within the catch-up process of joining the EU and harmonizing the legislative framework and developments with the aquis communautaire, the effort to set up and implement effective policies was relatively coherent. But the results achieved so far show that much more efforts are needed, as the participation rate of adults in educa- tion is still only 1.6 percent. Positive trends can be identified as well: a diversified range of institutions, a national system of quality assurance and of APEL (Accreditation of Prior Experiential Learning), increased funds allocated in the last two years, and an increased awareness and know-how in the field of ACE1. 1. Looking back at the last two decades Romania is one of the largest countries to have joined the European Union recently, with about 22 million inhabitants. Since 1989, the year of the revolution that ended communist domination, the country is undergoing a transformation from a central- ized state communist society and ideology to a democratic pluralist one and mar- ket economy. This transition required the enablement of adults to cope with these changes, on the one hand. On the other hand, this transition meant the restructuring of the labour market since large industrial enterprises were closed down and many small and medium enterprises (SME) were set up. The closing down of the large, formerly state owned enterprises forced them to lay off large numbers of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Antisemitism in Romania? Hard Data and Its Soft Underbelly Shafir, Michael
    www.ssoar.info Political antisemitism in Romania? Hard data and its soft underbelly Shafir, Michael Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Shafir, M. (2012). Political antisemitism in Romania? Hard data and its soft underbelly. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 12(4), 557-603. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-445667 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Political Antisemitism in Romania? 557 Political Antisemitism in Romania? Hard Data and its Soft Underbelly MICHAEL SHAFIR As in many other former communist countries of East Central Europe1, antisemitism in Romania resurged almost concomitantly with the demise of the former regime2. Empirical research on antisemitism, however, emerged only considerably later and did not take off as a main focus until the establishment of the National Institute for the Study of the Holocaust in Romania ”Elie Wiesel” (INSHREW) in 2005. This does not imply that the subject of Jews, attitudes to Jews measured by instruments such as stereotypic perceptions and/or ”social distance”, or attitudes toward controversial Romanian historical figures linked to the country’s antisemitic past was not tangentially or even directly tackled on occasion. What lacked until 2005, however, was an effort to systematically (among other instruments, employing a standard questionnaire capable of rendering comparative results) place under focus the phenomenon in its synchronic and diachronic unfolding.
    [Show full text]
  • Romani CRISS E-Mail: [email protected] Roma Center for Social Intervention and Studies
    19, Buzesti street, Sector 1 Bucharest – Romania Tel: 004 021 / 310 70 60 Fax: 004 021/ 310 70 70 Romani CRISS E-mail: [email protected] Roma Center for Social Intervention and Studies www.romanicriss.org Bucharest, 27th of August 2007 To: Mr. Jose Manuel Durao Barroso, President of the European Commission Mr. Hans-Gert Poettering, President of the European Parliament Mr. Terry Davis, Secretary General of the Council of Europe Mr. Miguel Angel Moratinos, President in office of the OSCE Mr. Ban Ki-moon, Secretary General of the United Nations In attention of: Mr. Romano Prodi, President of Council of Ministers of Italy Mr. Calin Popescu-Tariceanu, Prim-Minister of Romania Mr. Adrian Cioroianu- Minister of External Affairs of Romania Mr. Cristian David-Minister of Interior and Administrative Reform of Romania YOUR EXCELLENCIES, On the night of 10th to 11th of August, in a camp near Livorno, Italy, a fire occurred and four Romanian children of Roma ethnicity – age between 4 and 10) died. During the investigation, the Italian authorities arrested the parents of the minors under the accusation of negligence and non-provision of assistance in emergency situations. The parents denied the accusations and reported they had been attacked by unidentified persons and that the fire has been started intentionally. On 17th of August, an extremist group, GAPE – Armed group for ethnic cleansing, claimed responsibility for fire, including for the death of the four children and gave an ultimatum to the Roma in Italy: “We give the Roma 20 days, starting with August 25, to leave the Italian soil and evacuate the nomad camps all over the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Evenimente Dedicate Marcării a 25 De Ani De La
    Evenimente dedicate marcării a 25 de ani de la căderea comunismului în România Argentina În cadrul evenimentelor dedicate marcării a 25 de ani de la căderea comunismului în România, Ambasada României în Argentina a organizat, în colaborare cu unul dintre cele mai prestigioase centre academice din Argentina, CARI, seminarul intitulat „A 25-a aniversare a restaurării democrației în România. Tranziţie, artă şi memorie după dictaturile din Europa de Est şi Conul Sudic”. Prezentările principale au fost susţinute de însărcinatul cu afaceri a.i. al României în Argentina şi de lect. univ. dr. Caterina Preda, Universitatea Bucureşti. Evenimentul a fost moderat de directorul Comitetului Afaceri Europene din cadrul CARI Alberto Daverede şi de către Horacio Chalian, fost ambasador al Argentinei în Ungaria. Au participat ambasadori argentinieni şi străini, alţi diplomaţi acreditaţi la Buenos Aires, reprezentanţi ai mediului academic şi cultural şi ai comunităţii de români. În introducerea evenimentului, reprezentanţii CARI au prezentat semnificaţia evenimentelor din 1989 şi situaţia concretă din România la acel moment, precum şi câteva aspecte legate de dezvoltarea ţării şi locul actual pe scena mondială. Însărcinatul cu afaceri a.i. al României a prezentat aspectele principale legate de procesul de tranziţie, pornind de la momentul 1989, cu detalii despre măsurile esenţiale adoptate la nivel intern – politice, economice, sociale etc. – precum şi etapele principale pe plan extern. A detaliat astfel procesele de accedere la UE şi NATO şi priorităţile urmărite de România în cadrul acestor organizaţii, precum şi în cadrul Consiliului Europei, ONU, OSCE şi al altor structuri regionale, subliniind totodată proiectele iiţiate de România ca membru sau preşedinte-în-exerciţiu al acestor foruri.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tragicomedy of Romanian Communism
    RESEARCH REPORT T O NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : THE TRAGICOMEDY OF ROMANIAN COMMUNIS M AUTHOR : Vladimir Tismanean u CONTRACTOR : Foreign Policy Researc h Institute PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Vladimir Tismanean u COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 903-0 4 DATE : September, 198 9 The work leading to this report was supported by funds provided b y the National Council for Soviet and East European Research . Th e analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those o f the author . a NOTE This report, based on an article to be published i n Eastern EuropeanPolitics andSocieties, is an inciden- tal product of the Council Contract identified on the title page . It is not the Final Report, which wa s distributed in August, 1989 . TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Stalin's Romanian Disciples 1 1 The Comintern and the RCP 1 6 Stalinism for All Seasons 3 4 The Anti-De-Stalinization Platform 3 9 The Road to Absolute Power 43 The Manipulated Manipulator 47 Assault on the Party Apparatus 5 2 Notes 57 The Tragicomedy of Romanian Communis m Vladimir Tismanean u Un monde sans tyrans serait aussi ennuyeux qu'un jardi n zoologique sans hyenes . E . M . Cioran, Histoire et utopi e Now, despite eternal cabals in the inner clique and unendin g shifts of personnel, with their tremendous accumulation o f hatred, bitterness, and personal resentment, the Leader' s position can remain secure against chaotic palace revolution s not because of his superior gifts, about which the men in hi s intimate surroundings frequently have no great illusions, bu t because of these men's sincere and sensible conviction tha t without him everything would be immediately lost .
    [Show full text]
  • Freeex Report P R E S S F R E E D O M I N R O M a N I a 2 0 0 9
    FREEEX REPORT P R E S S F R E E D O M I N R O M A N I A 2 0 0 9 - Member of the Reporters without Borders Network - Bucharest 2010 FREEEX REPORT P R E S S F R E E D O M I N R O M A N I A 2 0 0 9 - Member of the Reporters without Borders Network - This report was compiled within the FreeEx Program of ActiveWatch - the Media Monitoring Agency. Freedom of Expression Program - FreeEx was started by ActiveWatch - the Media Monitoring Agency in August 1999, with a view to contribute to the protection and promotion of the right to free expression and to press freedom. ActiveWatch - the Media Monitoring Agency publishes annual reports on press freedom situation in Romania. This report is funded by the Open Society Institute (OSI). The content of this report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of OSI. Authors: Liana Ganea Răzvan Martin Ştefan Cândea Maria Adriana Popa Vlad Ursulean We wish to thank to all those who contributed to this report: Nicoleta Fotiade, Ionuț Codreanu, Ioana Avădani, Cezar Ion, Petrișor Obae, Dan Duca, Mihaela Enache – Mihiș. We wish to thank for the expertise provided to the FreeEx department during the entire year: Mircea Toma, Diana Hatneanu, Dan Mihai, Bogdan Manolea, Doru Costea, Iulia Mălăescu. We wish to thank all journalists who published news and features about the media, and especialy to HotNews, Mediafax, Paginademedia.ro and ReporterVirtual.ro Layout and design: Alexandra Cândea Dan Ichimescu Donors: Open Society Institute © Media Monitoring Agency Member of the Reporters without Borders Network Address: 98 Calea Plevnei, BL.
    [Show full text]