(CCBA-PDD) Version 02 CONTENTS I. Basic Data II. General Section G1. O
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Risk Assessment
Designation = High Risk WRA Score = 9 Family: Bignoniaceae Taxon: Parmentiera aculeata Synonym: Crescentia aculeata Kunth (basionym) Common Name: Cow-okra Parmentiera edulis DC. Cucumber Tree cuajilote Questionaire : current 20090513 Assessor: Chuck Chimera Designation: H(HPWRA) Status: Assessor Approved Data Entry Person: Chuck Chimera WRA Score 9 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? y=1, n=-1 103 Does the species have weedy races? y=1, n=-1 201 Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If island is primarily wet habitat, then (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High substitute "wet tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" high) (See Appendix 2) 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High high) (See Appendix 2) 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y 204 Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or subtropical climates y=1, n=0 y 205 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2), n= question 205 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 y 402 Allelopathic y=1, n=0 n 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable -
Bignoniaceae)
Systematic Botany (2007), 32(3): pp. 660–670 # Copyright 2007 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists Taxonomic Revisions in the Polyphyletic Genus Tabebuia s. l. (Bignoniaceae) SUSAN O. GROSE1 and R. G. OLMSTEAD Department of Biology, University of Washington, Box 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195 U.S.A. 1Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Communicating Editor: James F. Smith ABSTRACT. Recent molecular studies have shown Tabebuia to be polyphyletic, thus necessitating taxonomic revision. These revisions are made here by resurrecting two genera to contain segregate clades of Tabebuia. Roseodendron Miranda consists of the two species with spathaceous calices of similar texture to the corolla. Handroanthus Mattos comprises the principally yellow flowered species with an indumentum of hairs covering the leaves and calyx. The species of Handroanthus are also characterized by having extremely dense wood containing copious quantities of lapachol. Tabebuia is restricted to those species with white to red or rarely yellow flowers and having an indumentum of stalked or sessile lepidote scales. The following new combinations are published: Handroanthus arianeae (A. H. Gentry) S. Grose, H. billbergii (Bur. & K. Schum). S. Grose subsp. billbergii, H. billbergii subsp. ampla (A. H. Gentry) S. Grose, H. botelhensis (A. H. Gentry) S. Grose, H. bureavii (Sandwith) S. Grose, H. catarinensis (A. H. Gentry) S. Grose, H. chrysanthus (Jacq.) S. Grose subsp. chrysanthus, H. chrysanthus subsp. meridionalis (A. H. Gentry) S. Grose, H. chrysanthus subsp. pluvicolus (A. H. Gentry) S. Grose, H. coralibe (Standl.) S. Grose, H. cristatus (A. H. Gentry) S. Grose, H. guayacan (Seemann) S. Grose, H. incanus (A. H. -
The Evolution of Bat Pollination: a Phylogenetic Perspective
Annals of Botany 104: 1017–1043, 2009 doi:10.1093/aob/mcp197, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org INVITED REVIEW The evolution of bat pollination: a phylogenetic perspective Theodore H. Fleming1,*, Cullen Geiselman2 and W. John Kress3 1Emeritus, Department of Biology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA, 2Institute of Systematic Botany, The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458, USA and 3Department of Botany, MRC-166, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA Received: 2 April 2009 Returned for revision: 27 May 2009 Accepted: 13 July 2009 Published electronically: 29 September 2009 † Background Most tropical and subtropical plants are biotically pollinated, and insects are the major pollinators. A small but ecologically and economically important group of plants classified in 28 orders, 67 families and about 528 species of angiosperms are pollinated by nectar-feeding bats. From a phylogenetic perspective this is a derived pollination mode involving a relatively large and energetically expensive pollinator. Here its ecologi- cal and evolutionary consequences are explored. Downloaded from † Scope and Conclusions This review summarizes adaptations in bats and plants that facilitate this interaction and discusses the evolution of bat pollination from a plant phylogenetic perspective. Two families of bats contain specialized flower visitors, one in the Old World and one in the New World. Adaptation to pollination by bats has evolved independently many times from a variety of ancestral conditions, including insect-, bird- and non-volant mammal-pollination. Bat pollination predominates in very few families but is relatively common in certain angiosperm subfamilies and tribes. -
Lamiales – Synoptical Classification Vers
Lamiales – Synoptical classification vers. 2.6.2 (in prog.) Updated: 12 April, 2016 A Synoptical Classification of the Lamiales Version 2.6.2 (This is a working document) Compiled by Richard Olmstead With the help of: D. Albach, P. Beardsley, D. Bedigian, B. Bremer, P. Cantino, J. Chau, J. L. Clark, B. Drew, P. Garnock- Jones, S. Grose (Heydler), R. Harley, H.-D. Ihlenfeldt, B. Li, L. Lohmann, S. Mathews, L. McDade, K. Müller, E. Norman, N. O’Leary, B. Oxelman, J. Reveal, R. Scotland, J. Smith, D. Tank, E. Tripp, S. Wagstaff, E. Wallander, A. Weber, A. Wolfe, A. Wortley, N. Young, M. Zjhra, and many others [estimated 25 families, 1041 genera, and ca. 21,878 species in Lamiales] The goal of this project is to produce a working infraordinal classification of the Lamiales to genus with information on distribution and species richness. All recognized taxa will be clades; adherence to Linnaean ranks is optional. Synonymy is very incomplete (comprehensive synonymy is not a goal of the project, but could be incorporated). Although I anticipate producing a publishable version of this classification at a future date, my near- term goal is to produce a web-accessible version, which will be available to the public and which will be updated regularly through input from systematists familiar with taxa within the Lamiales. For further information on the project and to provide information for future versions, please contact R. Olmstead via email at [email protected], or by regular mail at: Department of Biology, Box 355325, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA. -
Plant Names Catalog 2013 1
Plant Names Catalog 2013 NAME COMMON NAME FAMILY PLOT Abildgaardia ovata flatspike sedge CYPERACEAE Plot 97b Acacia choriophylla cinnecord FABACEAE Plot 199:Plot 19b:Plot 50 Acacia cornigera bull-horn acacia FABACEAE Plot 50 Acacia farnesiana sweet acacia FABACEAE Plot 153a Acacia huarango FABACEAE Plot 153b Acacia macracantha steel acacia FABACEAE Plot 164 Plot 176a:Plot 176b:Plot 3a:Plot Acacia pinetorum pineland acacia FABACEAE 97b Acacia sp. FABACEAE Plot 57a Acacia tortuosa poponax FABACEAE Plot 3a Acalypha hispida chenille plant EUPHORBIACEAE Plot 4:Plot 41a Acalypha hispida 'Alba' white chenille plant EUPHORBIACEAE Plot 4 Acalypha 'Inferno' EUPHORBIACEAE Plot 41a Acalypha siamensis EUPHORBIACEAE Plot 50 'Firestorm' Acalypha siamensis EUPHORBIACEAE Plot 50 'Kilauea' Acalypha sp. EUPHORBIACEAE Plot 138b Acanthocereus sp. CACTACEAE Plot 138a:Plot 164 Acanthocereus barbed wire cereus CACTACEAE Plot 199 tetragonus Acanthophoenix rubra ARECACEAE Plot 149:Plot 71c Acanthus sp. ACANTHACEAE Plot 50 Acer rubrum red maple ACERACEAE Plot 64 Acnistus arborescens wild tree tobacco SOLANACEAE Plot 128a:Plot 143 1 Plant Names Catalog 2013 NAME COMMON NAME FAMILY PLOT Plot 121:Plot 161:Plot 204:Plot paurotis 61:Plot 62:Plot 67:Plot 69:Plot Acoelorrhaphe wrightii ARECACEAE palm:Everglades palm 71a:Plot 72:Plot 76:Plot 78:Plot 81 Acrocarpus fraxinifolius shingle tree:pink cedar FABACEAE Plot 131:Plot 133:Plot 152 Acrocomia aculeata gru-gru ARECACEAE Plot 102:Plot 169 Acrocomia crispa ARECACEAE Plot 101b:Plot 102 Acrostichum aureum golden leather fern ADIANTACEAE Plot 203 Acrostichum Plot 195:Plot 204:Plot 3b:Plot leather fern ADIANTACEAE danaeifolium 63:Plot 69 Actephila ovalis PHYLLANTHACEAE Plot 151 Actinorhytis calapparia calappa palm ARECACEAE Plot 132:Plot 71c Adansonia digitata baobab MALVACEAE Plot 112:Plot 153b:Plot 3b Adansonia fony var. -
Preliminary in Vitro Biological and Phytochemical Screenings of Parmentiera Cereifera Seem
Bangladesh Pharmaceutical Journal 15(2): 103-106, 2012 Preliminary In Vitro Biological and Phytochemical Screenings of Parmentiera cereifera Seem Md. Reyad-ul-Ferdous1, Ridwan Bin Rashid2, Md. Al Amin Sikder3, Fahima Aktar3 and Mohammad A. Rashid3 1Department of Pharmacy, State University of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh 2Department of Microbiology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh 3Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh Abstract In this present study, the leaf extracts of Parmentiera cereifera were subjected to a comparative evaluation of the antioxidant capacities, phenol and polyphenols content, membrane stabilization, thrombolytic, antimicrobial activities and cytotoxicity to brine shrimps (Artemia salina). When the DPPH (1,1- Diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl) radical scavenging effect was determined spectrophotometrically significant radical scavenging property was observed in crude methanol extract (ME) with IC50 of 21.95 µg/ml. Here, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and ascorbic acid (ASA) were used as standard antioxidants. The phenol and polyphenol content of the extractives varied between 56.84 to 89.58 mg of GAE/gm of dried extract. The thrombolytic and membrane stabilizing activities were assessed by using human erythrocyte and the results were compared with standard streptokinase (SK) and standard anti-inflammatory drug, acetyl salicylic acid (ASA), respectively. The extracts demonstrated significant toxicity to A. salina with LC50 values ranging from 6.07 to 7.83 µg/ml as compared to standard Vincristine sulphate (VS, LC50value 0.45 µg/ml). On the other hand, the chloroform soluble fraction (CSF) of methanol extract revealed moderate antibacterial activity against some microorganisms used in the screening. Preliminary phytochemical investigation suggested the presence of flavonoids, saponins, tannins, triterpenoids and steroids. -
Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: an and Taxonomists Throughout the World Who Have Left Inventory
United States Department of Agriculture Perennial Edible Fruits Agricultural Research Service of the Tropics Agriculture Handbook No. 642 An Inventory t Abstract Acknowledgments Martin, Franklin W., Carl W. Cannpbell, Ruth M. Puberté. We owe first thanks to the botanists, horticulturists 1987 Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: An and taxonomists throughout the world who have left Inventory. U.S. Department of Agriculture, written records of the fruits they encountered. Agriculture Handbook No. 642, 252 p., illus. Second, we thank Richard A. Hamilton, who read and The edible fruits of the Tropics are nnany in number, criticized the major part of the manuscript. His help varied in form, and irregular in distribution. They can be was invaluable. categorized as major or minor. Only about 300 Tropical fruits can be considered great. These are outstanding We also thank the many individuals who read, criti- in one or more of the following: Size, beauty, flavor, and cized, or contributed to various parts of the book. In nutritional value. In contrast are the more than 3,000 alphabetical order, they are Susan Abraham (Indian fruits that can be considered minor, limited severely by fruits), Herbert Barrett (citrus fruits), Jose Calzada one or more defects, such as very small size, poor taste Benza (fruits of Peru), Clarkson (South African fruits), or appeal, limited adaptability, or limited distribution. William 0. Cooper (citrus fruits), Derek Cormack The major fruits are not all well known. Some excellent (arrangements for review in Africa), Milton de Albu- fruits which rival the commercialized greatest are still querque (Brazilian fruits), Enriquito D. -
Leaf Morphoanatomy Studies of Parmentiera Cereifera Seem., Family Bignoniaceae, Cultivated in Egypt", It Could Be Helpful in Authentication of the Leaf
Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2015; 3(6): 47-57 E-ISSN: 2278-4136 Leaf Morphoanatomy Studies of Parmentiera cereifera P-ISSN: 2349-8234 JPP 2015; 3(6): 47-57 Seem., Family Bignoniaceae, Cultivated in Egypt Received: 02-12-2014 Accepted: 04-01-2015 Nada M. Abdel-Wahab, Ashraf N. E. Hamed, Hany E. Khalil, Mohamed S. Kamel Nada M. Abdel-Wahab Department of Pharmacognosy, Abstract Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia Parmentiera cereifera Seem. is one of the edible and medicinal plants. It is known as Candle tree, University, 61519 Minia, Egypt. Candlestick tree and Panama Candle tree. Reviewing the available literature, only two studies could be traced concerning the microscopical features of P. cereifera. The current leaf morphoanatomy studies Ashraf N. E. Hamed showed various standardized parameters such as macroscopic and microscopic characters. These various Department of Pharmacognosy, diagnostic features could be helpful in authentication and identification of P. cereifera Seem. leaf. Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, 61519 Minia, Egypt. Keywords: Parmentiera cereifera Seem., Bignoniaceae, leaf, leaflet, rachis, morphoanatomy Hany E. Khalil 1. Introduction Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia Family Bignoniaceae is rich in secondary metabolites and includes many genera of high [1] [2] University, 61519 Minia, Egypt. economic and medicinal values . It is known as the Bignonia family . It is widely [3] distributed in tropical and subtropical regions, with a few species in temperate climates . It Mohamed S. Kamel comprises 104 genera and 860 species, according to the last taxonomic revision [3]. One of Department of Pharmacognosy, these species is Parmentiera cereifera Seem. It is one of the edible and medicinal plants [4]. -
Analysis of Diversity Using Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR): Distinctions Between Original Parmentiera Cereifera Tree and Somaclone
Elshafei and Esmaiel Bulletin of the National Research Centre (2018) 42:33 Bulletin of the National https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-018-0037-y Research Centre RESEARCH Open Access Analysis of diversity using simple sequence repeat (SSR): distinctions between original Parmentiera cereifera tree and somaclones Adel Ahmed Elshafei1* and Naglaa Mohamed Esmaiel2 Abstract Background: The possibility of culturing Parmentiera cereifera in vitro was tested. Shoot tips and lateral buds were cultured in three media that were based on Murashige and Skoog (MS) but supplemented with different types and concentrations of growth regulators. Thirty-eight simple sequence repeat (SSR) primers were used to assess the genetic stability of the regenerated plantlets. Results: Lateral buds recorded the highest significant mean values for shoot, root length, and the number of leaves when cultured in MS + 1.2 mg/l of 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) + 1.5 g/l of activated charcoal. Seeds were also grown in different media. The best results were obtained with MS basal medium. The resulting shoots were rooted in MS medium, with 1.5 g/l of activated charcoal. Regenerated plants were acclimatized in the greenhouse. The 38 SSR primers produced 63 scorable bands ranging from 1 to 3, with an average of 1.68 per primer. Fifty-five monomorphic bands were obtained that ranged from 0 to 3, with an average of 1.45 per primer. The coefficient of similarity matrix ranged from 0.92 to 1.0, with an average of 97.4. Dendrogram generated using the SSR data tended to group the in vitro plants with the mother plant into two major clusters. -
Petiolar Anatomy of Certain Members of Bignoniaceae
Proe. indian Aead. Sci., Vol. 85 B, No. 2, 1977, pp. 57-66. Petiolar anatomy of certain members of Bignoniaceae M. L. TRIVZDI, SHebA AND VEronA ~A Department of Botany, Punjabi University, Patiala 147002 MS received 1 September 1976; in revised form 14 October 1976 ABSTRACT The petiolar anatomy of sixteen species belonging to iourteen genera of Bignoniaceae has been studied. Two aspects, namely, the vascular pattern in the slender part of the petiole and the mode of vascular supply from the primary rachis to leaflets or secondary rachii, are taken into consideration. On the basis of the ~asculature as seen in tran.,ecticn of the slendeI part, four main types of petioles have been recognized, while thereare three patterns of vascular supply. A key also has been devised to identify these sixteen species. 1. INTRODUCTION PETIOLAR anatomy has received considerable attention of anatomists from time to time. One of the most comprehensive works on this aspect is by Watari} on Leguminosae. Howard ~' also has surveyed the petiole vasculature i n a large number of dicot families and found this structure to be of great taxonomic value. Carlquist 3 favoured correlated study of node-petiole structure. Howard ~ also advocated the study of the stem node-leaf-continuum The present study deals with the petiolar anatomy of certain Bignoniaceous members. The nodal anatomy of some members has already been studied by the present authors. 5 2. MATERIALSAND METHODS Materials for the present study were collected from plants growing in the Botanical Garden and the University Campus. The growing shoot tips with young leaves were fixed in F.A.A. -
Edible Nuts. Non-Wood Forest Products
iii <J)z o '"o ~ NON-WOODNO\ -WOOD FORESTFOREST PRODUCTSPRODUCTS o 55 Edible nuts Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations NON-WOOD0 \ -WOOD FOREST FOREST PRODUCTS PRODUCTS 55 EdibleEdible nuts by G.E. Wickens FOOD AND AGRICULTUREAGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITEDUNITED NATIONSNATIONS Rome,Rome, 19951995 The opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflectreflect opinionsopinions onon thethe partpart ofof FAO.FAO. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do notnot implyimplythe the expressionexpression ofof any anyopinion opinion whatsoever whatsoever onon thethe part of thethe FoodFood andand AgricultureAgriculture OrganizationOrganization of thethe UnitedUnited Nations concerning the legal status of any country,country, territory,territory, citycity oror area or ofof itsits authorities, authorities, orconcerningor concerning the the delimitation delimitation ofof its its frontiers frontiers or boundaries.boundaries. M-37 ISBNISBN 92-5-103748-5 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,reproduced , stored in a retrieval systemsystem,, or transmitted inin any formform oror byby anyany means, means ,electronic, electronic, mechanicalmechanical,, photocopying oror otherwiseotherwise,, without the prior permissionpermission ofof thethe copyright owner. Applications forfor such permission,permission, withwith a statementstatement of thethe purpose and extent of the reproduction,reproduction, should be addressed to the -
Ornamental Garden Plants of the Guianas, Part 4
Bromeliaceae Epiphytic or terrestrial. Roots usually present as holdfasts. Leaves spirally arranged, often in a basal rosette or fasciculate, simple, sheathing at the base, entire or spinose- serrate, scaly-lepidote. Inflorescence terminal or lateral, simple or compound, a spike, raceme, panicle, capitulum, or a solitary flower; inflorescence-bracts and flower-bracts usually conspicuous, highly colored. Flowers regular (actinomorphic), mostly bisexual. Sepals 3, free or united. Petals 3, free or united; corolla with or without 2 scale-appendages inside at base. Stamens 6; filaments free, monadelphous, or adnate to corolla. Ovary superior to inferior. Fruit a dry capsule or fleshy berry; sometimes a syncarp (Ananas ). Seeds naked, winged, or comose. Literature: GENERAL: Duval, L. 1990. The Bromeliads. 154 pp. Pacifica, California: Big Bridge Press. Kramer, J. 1965. Bromeliads, The Colorful House Plants. 113 pp. Princeton, New Jersey: D. Van Nostrand Company. Kramer, J. 1981. Bromeliads.179pp. New York: Harper & Row. Padilla, V. 1971. Bromeliads. 134 pp. New York: Crown Publishers. Rauh, W. 1919.Bromeliads for Home, Garden and Greenhouse. 431pp. Poole, Dorset: Blandford Press. Singer, W. 1963. Bromeliads. Garden Journal 13(1): 8-12; 13(2): 57-62; 13(3): 104-108; 13(4): 146- 150. Smith, L.B. and R.J. Downs. 1974. Flora Neotropica, Monograph No.14 (Bromeliaceae): Part 1 (Pitcairnioideae), pp.1-658, New York: Hafner Press; Part 2 (Tillandsioideae), pp.663-1492, New York: Hafner Press; Part 3 (Bromelioideae), pp.1493-2142, Bronx, New York: New York Botanical Garden. Weber, W. 1981. Introduction to the taxonomy of the Bromeliaceae. Journal of the Bromeliad Society 31(1): 11-17; 31(2): 70-75.