DOCSLIB.ORG

Aydıncık Nüfus Defterleri

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aydıncık Nüfus Defterleri (NAHİYE-İ KIZILKÜNBED) AYDINCIK NÜFUS DEFTERLERİ (1838-1841) Hazırlayan Dr. Ebubekir GÜNGÖR AYDINCIK 1967 BELEDİYESİ 2017 (NAHİYE-İ KIZILKÜNBED) AYDINCIK NÜFUS DEFTERLERİ (1838-1841) Mart 2017 ISBN: 978-605-82728-0-4 Tasarım: Hangar Reklam Tel.: +90 312 425 07 34 www.hangarreklam.com Baskı, Cilt: Öncü Basımevi Kazım Karabekir Caddesi, No: 85/39 İskitler - Altındağ / Ankara Tel: +90 312 384 31 19 AYDINCIK 1967 BELEDİYESİ YOZGAT AYDINCIK BELEDİYESİ’NİN BİR KÜLTÜR HİZMETİDİR. YOZGAT AYDINCIK BELEDİYESİ Telefon : 0354 487 10 55 Fax : 0354 487 13 33 Adres : Yeni Mahalle Çekerek Caddesi No:18 Aydıncık/YOZGAT E-Mail : [email protected] Web Site : http://www.yozgataydincik.bel.tr İÇİNDEKİLER TAKDİM .................................................................................................................................................7 ÖNSÖZ ...................................................................................................................................................9 I. BÖLÜM AYDINCIK TARİHÇESİ 1.1. Tarihi Süreçte Bölgenin Adlandırılması .........................................................................................11 1.2. İlkçağlarda Aydıncık ......................................................................................................................13 1.3. Aydıncık’ın Höyük ve Sit Alanları .................................................................................................17 1.3.1. Sarıbaba Höyüğü ..................................................................................................................18 1.3.2. Gavurtepe Höyüğü ...............................................................................................................18 1.3.3. Dumansaray Höyüğü ............................................................................................................18 1.3.4. Gavurtepe Höyüğü ...............................................................................................................18 1.3.5. Kaletepe Höyüğü ..................................................................................................................19 1.3.6. Velibaşı Düz Yerleşimi ve Velibaşı Tümülüsü .....................................................................19 1.3.7. Rıdvan Kalesi ve Yerleşimi ...................................................................................................19 1.3.8. Kuşoturan Tepe Yerleşimi .....................................................................................................20 1.3.9. Turluk Tepe Yerleşimi ..........................................................................................................20 1.3.10. Karataş Nekropolü ...............................................................................................................20 1.4. Selçuklular Dönemi ve Aydıncık’ın Türkleşme Süreci ..................................................................20 1.5. Beylikler Dönemi ...........................................................................................................................22 1.6. Osmanlı Döneminde Aydıncık .......................................................................................................25 1.7. XIX. Yüzyıl ve Cumhuriyet Döneminde Aydıncık ........................................................................29 II. BÖLÜM AYDINCIK NÜFUS DEFTERLERİNİN TRANSKRİPSİYONU 2.1. 02510 Numaralı ve 1838 tarihli Zile Kazasında Meskûn Aşiretleri (Yabancı Müslümanları) Gösterir Nüfus Defterinin Transkripsiyonu ..................................................35 2.1.1. Kızıl Künbed Nahiyesine Bağlı Köy ve Kışlaklarda Meskûn Aşiretlerin Nüfusu ................36 2.1.1.1. Ağılcık Köyü.................................................................................................................36 2.1.1.2. Kızılca Kışla Köyü .......................................................................................................37 2.1.1.3. Eski Köyü (Kızıl Künbed) ............................................................................................39 2.1.1.4. Baydiğin Köyü ..............................................................................................................41 2.1.1.5.Dereçiftlik Köyü ............................................................................................................41 2.1.1.6. Hacı İlyas Kışlağı .........................................................................................................42 2.1.1.7. Bazlambaç Kışlağı ........................................................................................................42 2.1.1.8. Kösrelik Köyü...............................................................................................................48 2.1.1.9. Yenice Köyü..................................................................................................................51 2.1.1.10. Eski Kuyucak Kışlağı .................................................................................................52 2.1.1.11. Kocabekir Kışlağı .......................................................................................................54 2.1.1.12. Aşağı Dona Köyü........................................................................................................56 2.1.1.13. Sancı Köyü .................................................................................................................59 2.1.1.14. Sakızlık Kışlağı...........................................................................................................60 2.1.1.15. Molla İsmailoğlu Kışlağı ............................................................................................60 2.1.1.16. Köroğlu Kışlağı ..........................................................................................................61 2.1.1.17. Toraman Kışlağı ..........................................................................................................62 2.1.1.18. Üzümlük Kışlağı .........................................................................................................65 2.1.1.19. Kırkdilim Kışlağı ........................................................................................................66 2.1.1.20. Zile Kazası Aşiretleri ve Nüfusu ................................................................................71 3 (NAHİYE-İ KIZILKÜNBED) AYDINCIK NÜFUS DEFTERLERİ (1838-1841) 2.2. 02509 Numaralı ve 1838 tarihli Zile Kazasında Meskûn Yerli Müslümanları Gösterir Nüfus Defterinin Transkripsiyonu ..........................................................74 2.2.1. Kızıl Künbed Nahiyesine Bağlı Köylerde Meskûn Yerli Müslümanların Nüfusu ................74 2.2.1.1. Deveci Köyü .................................................................................................................74 2.2.1.2. Dona Köyü ....................................................................................................................79 2.2.1.3. Kürkçü Köyü ................................................................................................................81 2.2.1.4. Aşağı Dona ...................................................................................................................82 2.2.1.5. Sancı Köyü ...................................................................................................................83 2.2.1.6. Sancı Köyünde Bulunan Süleymanlı Aşireti Mensupları .............................................83 2.2.1.7. Dereçiftlik Köyü ...........................................................................................................84 2.2.1.8. Dereçiftlik Köyündeki Hergünlü Aşireti Mensupları ...................................................85 2.2.1.9. Kazankaya Köyü ...........................................................................................................86 2.2.1.10. Eymir Köyü ................................................................................................................93 2.2.1.11. Kürtler Köyü .............................................................................................................101 2.2.1.12. Eski Köyü (Kızıl Künbed) ........................................................................................102 2.2.1.13. Baydiğin Köyü ..........................................................................................................107 2.2.2. Ahalisi Yok Olan Köyler .....................................................................................................109 2.2.2.1. Kızıl Künbed Köyü .....................................................................................................109 2.2.2. 2. Ermiya Köyü..............................................................................................................109 2.2.2.3. Tatar Hamza Köyü ......................................................................................................110 2.2.2.4. Tankoş Köyü ...............................................................................................................110 2.3. 02517 Numaralı ve 1841 tarihli Zile Kazasında Meskûn Müslümanları Gösterir Nüfus Defterinin Transkripsiyonu .................................................................110 2.3.1. Kızıl Künbed Nahiyesine Bağlı Köylerde Meskûn Halkın Nüfusu ....................................110 2.3.1.1. Deveci Köyü ...............................................................................................................110 2.3.1.2. Herekenin Selyanlı Köyü ............................................................................................114
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The American Protestant Missionary Network in Ottoman Turkey, 1876-1914
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 4, No. 6(1); April 2014 The American Protestant Missionary Network in Ottoman Turkey, 1876-1914 Devrim Ümit PhD Assistant Professor Founding and Former Chair Department of International Relations Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Karabuk University Turkey Abstract American missionaries have long been the missing link in the study of the late Ottoman period despite the fact that they left their permanent trade in American as well as Western conceptions of the period such as “Terrible Turk” and “Red Sultan” just to name a few. From the landing of the first two American Protestant missionaries, Levi Parsons and Pliny Fisk, on the Ottoman Empire, as a matter of fact on the Near East, in early 1820, until the outbreak of the First World War in 1914, American missionaries occupied the increasing attention of the Ottoman bureaucracy in domestic and foreign affairs while the mission work in the Ottoman Empire established the largest investment of the American Board of Commissionaries for Foreign Missions (A.B.C.F.M.) in the world, even above China and India, on the eve of the war. The bulk of the correspondence of the Ottoman Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the period was with the United States and this was chiefly concerned about the American mission schools. Therefore, this paper seeks to examine the encounter between the Ottoman officialdom and the American Protestant missionaries in Ottoman Turkey during the successive regimes of Sultan Abdülhamid II and the Committee of Union and Progress, the Unionists in the period of 1876-1914.
    [Show full text]
  • Yozgat Yatırım Rehberi
    YOZGAT YATIRIM REHBERİ 2017 Mayıs, 2017 2 İÇİNDEKİLER GENEL BİLGİLER .......................................................................4 DİĞER TARİHİ ALANLAR......................................................................23 YOZGAT TARİHİ .......................................................................................................4 HATTUŞA ANTİK KENTİ ........................................................................23 2017 İKLİM VE COĞRAFYA .....................................................................................4 TAVİUM ANTİK KENTİ ...............................................................................24 NÜFUS ....................................................................................................................................5 YOZGAT KAPLICALARI ............................................................................24 SARIKAYA KAPLICALARI .....................................................................24 SOSYAL GÖSTERGELER ....................................................... 7 EĞİTİM ....................................................................................................................................7 SORGUN KAPLICALARI VE YERKÖY YOZGAT BOZOK ÜNİVERSİTESİ ..............................................7 KAPLICALARI ...........................................................................................................24 YOZGAT YATIRIM REHBERİ YATIRIM YOZGAT SAĞLIK ..................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's Return to the Muslim Balkans by Kerem Öktem
    New Islamic actors after the Wahhabi intermezzo: Turkey’s return to the Muslim Balkans By Kerem Öktem European Studies Centre, University of Oxford December 2010 New Islamic actors after the Wahhabi intermezzo: Turkey’s return to the Muslim Balkans | Kerem Öktem |Oxford| 2010 New Islamic actors after the Wahhabi intermezzo: Turkey’s return to the Muslim Balkans1 By Kerem Öktem St Antony's College, University of Oxford [email protected] Introduction The horrific events of 9/11 solidified Western popular interest in Islamic radicalism2, empow- ered particular discourses on religion as an all-encompassing identity (cf. Sen 2006) and cre- ated new bodies of research. International organizations, governments, academic institutions and independent research centres became keen on supporting a wide range of scholarly explor- ations of interfaith understanding—issues of identity and Muslim minority politics. Thus, a great many journal articles and edited volumes on Islam in Australia (e.g. Dunn 2004, 2005), Europe (e.g. Nielsen 2004; Hunter 2002), Canada (e.g. Isin and Semiatiki 2002) and the United States (Metcalf 1996) were published mainly by experts on the Middle East, theologians, po- litical scientists, human geographers and anthropologists. Simultaneously, security analysts and think-tankers produced numerous studies on the threat of Islamic terrorism, focusing on the activities of Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaida. It was in this context that a new body of neocon- 1 Paper first presented at the international workshop ‘After the Wahabi Mirage: Islam, politics and international networks in the Balkans’ at the European Studies Centre, University of Oxford in June 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • A Quest for Equality: Minorities in Turkey Dilek Kurban Kurdish Girl in Diyarbakır, Turkey
    report A Quest for Equality: Minorities in Turkey Dilek Kurban Kurdish girl in Diyarbakır, Turkey. Carlos Reyes-Manzo/Andes Press Agency. Acknowledgements University in Istanbul. She has received her law degree from This report was prepared and published as part of a project Columbia Law School. Previously she worked as an entitled ‘Combating discrimination and promoting minority Associate Political Affairs Officer at the United Nations rights in Turkey’, carried out in partnership with Minority Department of Political Affairs in New York City. She is the Rights Group International (MRG) and the Diyarbakır Bar author/co-author of various books, reports and academic Association. articles on minority rights, internal displacement and human rights protection in Turkey. The aim of this project is the protection of the ethnic, linguistic and religious rights enshrined in European The author would like to thank Elif Kalaycıoğlu for her standards (and reflected in the Copenhagen Criteria) of invaluable research assistance for this report. minorities in Turkey. The project focuses on the problem of displacement, anti-discrimination law and remedies, and Minority Rights Group International educational rights of minorities in Turkey. Minority Rights Group International (MRG) is a non- governmental organization (NGO) working to secure the This report was prepared with the financial support of the rights of ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities and EU. The contents of the document are entirely the indigenous peoples worldwide, and to promote cooperation responsibility of the project partners, and in no way represent and understanding between communities. Our activities are the views of the EU. focused on international advocacy, training, publishing and outreach.
    [Show full text]
  • Assimilation of the Muslim Communities in the First Decade of the Turkish Republic (1923-1934)
    European Journal of Turkish Studies Social Sciences on Contemporary Turkey Complete List | 2007 Assimilation of the Muslim communities in the first decade of the Turkish Republic (1923-1934) Erol Ülker Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ejts/822 DOI : 10.4000/ejts.822 ISSN : 1773-0546 Éditeur EJTS Référence électronique Erol Ülker, « Assimilation of the Muslim communities in the first decade of the Turkish Republic (1923-1934) », European Journal of Turkish Studies [En ligne], Liste complète, mis en ligne le 11 janvier 2008, consulté le 19 février 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ejts/822 ; DOI : 10.4000/ejts. 822 © Some rights reserved / Creative Commons license Citation: Ülker, Erol ‘Assimilation of the Muslim communities in the first decade of the Turkish Republic (1923-1934)‘, European Journal of Turkidh Studies, URL: http://www.ejts.org/document822.html To quote a passage, use paragraph (§). Assimilation of the Muslim communities in the first decade of the Turkish Republic (1923-1934) Erol Ülker Abstract. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how immigration- settlement policies were employed by post-Lausanne Turkey to create a homogenous nation-state. Focusing on the incorporation of immigrants in the period of 1923-1934, the paper argues that the state policies of migration and settlement pursued two primary objectives that were closely connected with the nationalizing measures. They were carried out for the assimilation of non-Turkish-speaking Muslims on the one hand, and for the Turkification of Kurdish-populated eastern provinces on the other. Citation: Ülker, Erol ‘Assimilation of the Muslim communities in the first decade of the Turkish Republic (1923-1934) ‘, European Journal of Turkish Studies, URL: http://www.ejts.org/document822.html To quote a passage, use paragraph (§).
    [Show full text]
  • 20.Yüzyil Başinda Yozgat Sancaği Ile Akdağmadeni Ve
    ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi The Journal of International Social Sciences Cilt: 30, Sayı: 1, Sayfa: 429-444, OCAK – 2020 Makale Gönderme Tarihi: 26.11.2019 Kabul Tarihi: 16.12.2019 20.YÜZYIL BAŞINDA YOZGAT SANCAĞI İLE AKDAĞMADENİ VE BOĞAZLIYAN KAZALARININ COĞRAFİ, TABİİ, SOSYAL, EKONOMİK VE İDARİ DURUMLARI Geographic, Natural, Social, Economic and Administrative Cases of Yozgat Sanjak with District of Akdagmadeni and Bogazlıyan at the Beginning of the 20th Century Hatice GÜZEL MUMYAKMAZ1 ÖZ Bu çalışma, 20.yüzyıl başında Ankara Vilayetine bağlı olan Yozgat Sancağının ve iki “büyük” kazası olan Boğazlıyan ve Akdağmadeni’nin coğrafi, tabii, sosyal, ekonomik ve idari durumunu ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu çerçevede çalışmanın ana kaynağını 1325 Numaralı Ankara Vilayeti Salnamesi ile Osmanlı Arşivi ve Cumhuriyet Arşivindeki belgeler oluşturmaktadır. Ayrıca Yozgat tarihi ile ilgili bazı araştırma eserlerinden de yararlanılmıştır. Çalışmada Yozgat’ın 20.yüzyıl başında neredeyse bugüne benzer coğrafi ve tabii özelliklere sahip olduğu kaydedilmiştir. Nüfus ekseriyeti Müslümanlardan oluşmakla beraber gayrimüslim nüfusa hem merkezde hem de Salnamede yer verilen bu iki kazada da rastlanmaktadır. Rum nüfus özellikle Akdağmadeni bölgesinde daha çoğunluktadır. Yozgat Sancağı ve ilçelerinin ekonomik durumu, vergiler ile yetiştirilen hububat ve hayvancılık üzerinden kayıtlanmıştır. Özellikle Akdağmadeni’nde Karadeniz’den Trabzon, Gümüşhane ve Ünye’den uzun süre önce gelmiş Rum nüfusun askere gitmemek için tekrar Hristiyanlığı seçmeye dönük talepleri belgelerde görülmektedir. Akdağmadeni adından anlaşılacağı üzere madenciliğin, taş işçiliğinin olduğu bir bölge olması sebebiyle de çekim alanı olmuştur. Anahtar Kelimeler: Yozgat Sancağı, Boğazlıyan, Akdağmadeni, Sosyo Ekonomik Tarih, İdari Tarih. ABSTRACT This sudy aims to reveal the geograpihical, natural, social, economic and adminstrative status of the Yozgat Sanjak of the Ankara Province at the begining of the 20th Century and the two major districts of Bogazlıyan and Akdagmadeni.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ottoman Documents and the Genocidal Policies of the Committee for Union and Progress (İttihat Ve Terakki) Toward the Armenians in 1915
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 1 Issue 2 Article 5 September 2006 The Ottoman Documents and the Genocidal Policies of the Committee for Union and Progress (İttihat ve Terakki) toward the Armenians in 1915 Taner Akçam Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp Recommended Citation Akçam, Taner (2006) "The Ottoman Documents and the Genocidal Policies of the Committee for Union and Progress (İttihat ve Terakki) toward the Armenians in 1915," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 1: Iss. 2: Article 5. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol1/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Ottoman Documents and the Genocidal Policies of the Committee for Union and Progress (_Ittihat ve Terakki) toward the Armenians in 1915 Taner Akc¸am University of Minnesota The author analyzes the Ottoman Archives as a source of information on the Armenian Genocide of 1915. He discusses the contradictory positions of two broad groups of scholars on the reliability of these archives, concluding that the Ottoman Archives agree with the information found in the archives of the United States, Britain, Germany, and Austria. He discusses the various categories of Ottoman documents, which mostly came out during the trials related to the Armenian Genocide, which took place from 1919 to 1921, and makes clear that there was a wide-ranging cleansing operation of the archives after the armistice in 1918.
    [Show full text]
  • Parazito Loji
    Original Investigation Türkiye Parazitol Derg 2019;(43)1:30-5 30 Özgün Araştırma DOI: 10.4274/tpd.galenos.2019.6219 Tick Bites on Humans in Southwestern Region of Turkey: Species Diversity Türkiye’nin Güney Batı Bölgesinde İnsanlardaki Kene Isırıkları: Türlerin Çeşitliliği Serkan Bakırcı, Nuran Aysul, Hüseyin Bilgin Bilgiç, Selin Hacılarlıoğlu, Hasan Eren, Tülin Karagenç Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Veterinary, Department of Parasitology, Aydın, Türkiye Cite this article as: Bakırcı S, Aysul N, Bilgiç H.B, Hacılarlıoğlu S, Eren H, Karagenç T, Tick Bites on Humans in Southwestern Region of Turkey: Species Diversity. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2019;43(1):30-5. ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of the present study was to determine tick species found on humans who suffered from tick bite in the Southwestern Anatolia Region, Turkey. Methods: Between January and October 2007, ticks were collected from people admitted to the city and/or town hospitals with complaints of tick bites in nine different provinces of Turkey. Genus and/or species of the ticks in adult, larva and nymph stages were identified microscopically. Identification was done using related taxonomic keys. Results: A total of 2.610 ticks were collected from humans who were admitted to the hospitals with complaints of tick bites in the Southwestern Anatolia Region in the present study. Of these, 1.858 samples were collected from the Aegean Region and the remaining 752 from the Mediterranean Region of the country. The ticks were identified as Hyalomma spp. (78.58%), Rhipicehalus spp. (18.89%), Ixodes spp. (0.88%), Dermacentor spp. (0.77%), Haemaphysalis spp. (0.61%), Argas spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Lichens from Gaziantep, Kahramanmarafl, K
    Turk J Bot 31 (2007) 161-170 © TÜB‹TAK Research Note Some Lichens from Gaziantep, Kahramanmarafl, K›rflehir and Yozgat Provinces (Turkey) Mehmet Gökhan HALICI*, Ahmet AKSOY, Mustafa KOCAKAYA Erciyes University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Biology, 38039 Kayseri - TURKEY Received: 22.06.2006 Accepted: 28.11.2006 Abstract: Fifty genera containing 152 taxa of lichenised and lichenicolous fungi were identified from 15 sampling stations in the Turkish provinces of Gaziantep, Kahramanmarafl, K›rflehir and Yozgat. Rosellinula frustulosae (Vouaux) R.Sant. is a new record for Turkey. Key Words: Lichens, Gaziantep, Kahramanmarafl, K›rflehir, Yozgat, Turkey Gaziantep, Kahramanmarafl, K›rflehir ve Yozgat ‹llerinden (Türkiye) Baz› Likenler Özet: Gaziantep, Kahramanmarafl, K›rflehir ve Yozgat illerinden 15 istasyondan 50 genusa ba¤l› 152 liken ve likenikol fungus taksonu belirlenmifltir. Rosellinula frustulosae (Vouaux) R.Sant. Türkiye için yeni kay›tt›r. Anahtar Sözcükler: Liken, Gaziantep, Kahramanmarafl, K›rflehir, Yozgat, Turkey Introduction sites are given in Table 1. The taxa are listed in About 360 papers refer to lichens from Turkey (John, alphabetical order for each locality. This allows a rough 2004). Few lichen taxa have been reported from the overview of the association of the lichens at the different study area (Steiner, 1916; John, 1996, 2002; Nimis & localities, covering in each case a comparable small area. John, 1998). Due to the short history of Turkish The nomenclature follows Hafellner & Türk (2001) lichenology, covering no more than 2 decades, large gaps and other modern results (Blanco et al., 2004). Author in the knowledge of the distribution of lichens in Turkey names are according to Brummitt & Powell (1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Migration from the Balkans to Anatolia: 1878-1900
    Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Sayı: 20 2008 FORCED MIGRATION FROM THE BALKANS TO ANATOLIA: 1878-1900 Prof. Dr. Faruk KOCACIK Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, TÜRKİYE [email protected] Doç. Dr. Cemal YALÇIN Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, TÜRKİYE [email protected] Abstract Migration can be dependent on many factors including economic, individual, political, natural disasters, ethnic and other social violence and wars. However, in this paper we mainly examined return migration from the Balkans to Anatolia in the form of escaping from violence and wars which we term forced migration. Towards the end of the Ottoman Empire, there were great conflicts between the central power of the Ottoman Empire and different nations. There were also wars between the Empire and some other countries. These wars and conflicts no doubt created migration of Turkish people and other minority groups who lived in the Balkans and other places. It should be stated that nations in the Balkans were trying to create more homogeneous populations in order to build nation states by forcing minority groups to leave their territories. With the weakening power of Ottoman Empire in the Balkans, it should be said that non-muslim groups were indeed in a life threatening situation created by the gangs of the Balkan nations. In order to provide Muslims with the means of migration, it can be seen that from the beginning of the conflicts, Ottoman Empire tried its best by sending ships and paying the cost of migration to individuals. A similar task was also undertaken by the authorities following the arrivals of migrants in Anatolia. They were settled in different towns and villages under the strict control of authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Record for Turkish Mycota from Akdağmadeni (Yozgat) Province: Russula Decolorans (Fr.) Fr
    Anatolian Journal of Botany 1 (1): 1-3 (2017) A new record for Turkish mycota from Akdağmadeni (Yozgat) province: Russula decolorans (Fr.) Fr. Epicr. Hakan IŞIK1*, İbrahim TÜRKEKUL2 1Tokat Science and Art Center, 60100, Tokat,Turkey 2 Gaziosmanpaşa University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Biology, 60200, Tokat,Turkey *[email protected] Türkiye mikotası için Akdağmadeni (Yozgat)’den Yeni Bir Kayıt: Russula decolorans (Fr.) Fr. Epicr. Abstract: In this study, macrofungi samples identified as Russula decolorans were collected in Akdağmadeni (Yozgat) province and recorded for the first time for the Turkish mycota. A short description of new record, illustrations, locality, collection date and habitat are provided. Key words: Akdağmadeni, biodiversity, new record, Russula decolorans, Turkey Özet: Bu çalışmada Russula decolorans olarak teşhis edilen makrofungus örnekleri Akdağmadeni (Yozgat) yöresinden toplandı ve Türkiye mikotası için ilk kez kaydedildi. Yeni kaydın kısa bir açıklaması, fotoğrafları, konumu, koleksiyon numarası ve habitatı verildi. Anahtar Kelimeler: Akdağmadeni, biyoçeşitlilik, Russula decolorans, Türkiye, yeni kayıt 1. Introduction ecological characteristics were recorded in their natural habitats. Then the samples were brought to the laboratory The Russula Pers. (Russulaceae, Russulales, and spore print was obtained. Some chemical reagents Basidiomycota) which was erected by Persoon (1796), is (KOH 5%, melzer’s reagent, cotton blue, safranin etc.) an important genus with high diversity in the Russulaceae were used for the examination of microscopic structures. family. The members of the genus are ectomycorrhizal Characteristic features related to lamellae, structure of symbionts and have great ecological and economical pileipellis, basidium, basidiospores, and cheilocystidia importance. They are an important food source for insects were obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Lead Seals of the 11Th Century from Yozgat 925
    DOI 10.1515/bz-2020-0040 BZ 2020; 113(3): 923–932 ErgünLaflı and Werner Seibt Four lead seals of the 11th centuryfrom Yozgat Abstract: In the museum of Yozgat in eastern-central Anatolia four eleventh cen- tury A.D.seals of Byzantine dignitaries are stored, all of them originateprobably from central Anatolia. Basileios Trichinopodes was hypatos and strategos of Anazarbus in Cilicia in the middle of the eleventh century,Katakalon was hypa- tos and strategos of Larissa in Cappadocia in the third quarter of the same cen- tury,acivil dignitary,probablynamed Pirmanes, was protospatharios and char- toularios of the Bucellarian Theme in the second half of the tenth or early eleventh century,and SamuelAlousianos, agrandson of the lastBulgarian tsar Ivan Vladislav, was proedros and dux, probablyfighting the Turkish in- vaders in Eastern Anatolia during the difficult years in the 1070s. Adressen: Prof.Dr. ErgünLaflı,Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Arkeoloji Bölümü, Tınaztepe/Kaynaklar Yerleşkesi, Buca, TR-35160 Izmir,Turkey; [email protected] – Prof.Dr. Werner Seibt, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Institut fürMittelalterforschung, Abteilung Byzanzforschung, Hollandstraße 11–13/4, A-1020 Vienna, austria; [email protected] In the museum of Yozgat four Byzantine lead seals are being stored, all of which belong to the eleventh century AD.The city of Yozgat is 217kmeast of Ankara and located in avery fertile plain east of the Halys (todayKızılırmak)ineastern- central Anatolia. In the eleventh centurythe region around Yozgat was included in Charsianon¹ in the former Greek-Roman region of Cappadocia, center of which was first in Charsianon (todayprobablyMuşalikalesi in Akdağmadeni, Yozgat) and later in Caesarea (todayKayseri).
    [Show full text]