DOCSLIB.ORG

Golden Gate Lawyer, Fall/Winter 2013-14 Lisa Lomba Golden Gate University School of Law, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Golden Gate Lawyer, Fall/Winter 2013-14 Lisa Lomba Golden Gate University School of Law, Llomba@Ggu.Edu Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons Golden Gate Lawyer Other Law School Publications 12-2013 Golden Gate Lawyer, Fall/Winter 2013-14 Lisa Lomba Golden Gate University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulawyer Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Lomba, Lisa, "Golden Gate Lawyer, Fall/Winter 2013-14" (2013). Golden Gate Lawyer. Paper 15. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulawyer/15 This Newsletter or Magazine is brought to you for free and open access by the Other Law School Publications at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Golden Gate Lawyer by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GOLDEN GATE LAWYER TH& MACIAZIN&OF GOLDEN GAT& UNIVERSITY BCHOOL DFLAW GOLDEN GATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW DEAN'S ADVISORY BOARD Chair: Hon. Lee D. Baxrer (JD 74, LLD 08)• (Retired) Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco Mark S. Anderson (JD 89)• Executive Vice President and Genera) Counsel Dolby Laboratories Mark E. Burton Jr. (JD 95)• 3 Cameron M. Carlson (JD 90)• President, Carlson Hammond Robert E. Cartwright Jr. (JD 82) Parmer, Cartwright & AleJ('3nder LLP Charles "Chip" Conradi Ill Hon. Thelton Henderson, p 10 Ill Hon. Ming W. Chin, p 16 Ill Mary Wright, p 25 (JD 78, MBA 81)• Vice President-Tax and Treasurer, The Clorox Company Daniel DeU'Osso (JD 84) FEATURES Attorney, The Brandi Law Fum Amy Eskin (JD 86) GGU LAW CLINIC 20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION ofcounseJ, Levin Simes LLP 1 1 Twenty Years of Training Social Justice Advocates and Serving the Community Simona Farrise (JD 93) Founder, The Farrise Law Firm ASSOCIATE JUSTICE MING W. CHIN Bernard Gutow (JD 97, LLM 98) 16 Law Offices of Bernard Gutow 5th Annual Chief Justice Ronald M. George Distinguished Lecture Karen L. Hawkins (JD 79, MBA 81) STANDING TALL WITH VETERANS Director, Offioe of Professional Responsibility 22 Internal Revenue Service 2013 Veterans Law Conference Pamela E. Pierson (JD 75) Parmer, Piersoo Coats PaLasb & Paul LLP 24 VETERANS LAW NETWORKING EVENT Marjorie Randolph OD 77) Mentoring Mixer Allan H. Rappaport 00 85) Founder, NES Hold!"'':' Inc. Kathryn E. Ringgold (JD 70) Law Offioe of Kathryn E. Ringgold DEPARTMENTS Mitchell Shapson (JD 86, LLM 03) Attorney, California Public Utilities ~ LETTER FROM THE DEAN Commission Richard I. Sherman OD 74) 12 THEORY TO PRACTICE Attorney, DeGoff and Sherman Timothy H. Smallsreed (JD 77, M 78) 26 CLASS NOTES Parmer, Wendel, Ro.en, Black & Dean UP IN MEMORIAM Arthttr K. Wachtel (.ID 78) 28 Attorney at Law 35 CALENDAR OF EVENTS • GGU Board of Trustees IMfi!!!.!riWIFHJ!b @fi I I School of Law ~... 536 Mission Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-2968 p 415.442.6600 f 415.442.6609 [email protected] law.ggu.edu Dear Alumni and Friends, My grandfather did not speak much about his service during World War II, but he referenced it just enough that my own setbacks and disappointments were handily put into perspective. Indeed, the challenges and often ravages of war upon individuals, and their families, leave most of us speechless. After reading David Finkel's recent book, Thank You For Your Service, I have a better understanding of why my grandfather did not talk much about his service. Finkel's extraordinary narrative helps individuals like me, with no military experience, glimpse the visible and invisible wounds of war as well as the impact on the families of those who serve. Describing the complex experiences of heroes on the battlefield who return as veterans with immense obstacles and delays in obtaining the support they earned and require, Finkel helps us understand what veterans face and even how the justice system they defended through their service has sadly failed them in some ways. Veterans are at the center of this issue of our magazine. In our last issue we profiled some of our veteran students. In this issue, you will learn how GGU is just beginning to fill the justice gap for this deserving population by using our strengths in practice­ based education to serve veterans. I encourage you to read the lecture reprinted here, given by Associate Justice Ming Chin of the Supreme Court of California at this fall's Fifth Annual Chief Justice Ronald M. George Distinguished Lecture, the theme of which was Veterans in the Judiciary. In his very moving lecture, Chin discussed his experience in the Vietnam War as a soldier and as a returning soldier, and the valuable service rendered by our service men and women. In addition to our work supporting our veteran community, in the past two months, GGU Law students, faculty, and alumni have enjoyed an inspiring combination of public recognition, milestone community events, and key student victories. The 12th Annual IP Law & Policy Conference was attended by lawyers and students, the Clinics 20th Anniversary Celebration fundraiser was a wonderful tribute to the clinic founders, and the 2nd Annual Professor Bernie Segal National Mock Trial Competition: In Vino Veritas continues to garner rave reviews nationally. GGU Law's latest program innovations serving students, and record number of student victories in mock trial competitions, help our students hone the skills so critical to their professional success-so much of our work with students, alumni, and the legal community fill me with pride. I am grateful for the many ways each of you, our alumni and friends, participate with us to strengthen the experience and opportunities of the next generation of GGU alumni. Your continued support is especially important now, when legal education and the legal profession are undergoing significant transformations. Thank you, and happy new year to you, your family and friends. Sincerely, ~Ull~ Ra:chel Van Cleave Dean 5 Two ABA Teams From Left to Right: Lori Mullins, Lauren Whitted, Jacob Colvin, Dustin Helmer, Sun ita Popal, Coach Brandon Schantz OD 11), Coach Julia Levitskaia UD 12), Kassie Cardullo, Khushil Naik, Baxter Fellow Katya Salganick (JD 13) ATremendous Fall Season for GGU Litigation by Blair Pickus (]D 13), Baxter Fellow This fall, the GGU L1t1gation Center and our mock trial - all culminating in a final trial. Whether through STEP or teams showed the nation that GGU advocates are a force GGU Litigation's various trial courses, all students must to be reckoned with. Our litigation alumni share in this have taken or be enrolled in trial advocacy and evidence success, through their coaching, contributions, volunteerism, in order to compere in mock trial. Professor Porter focuses and other meaningful support of Litigation, one of GGU our competitors on advocacy skills, professionalism, and Law's greatest traditions and strengths. command of the facts and rules of evidence. The Fundamentals The Hard Work - Over the past three months, GGU has competed in five Practice and Preparation competitions and hosted a national competition of our own. After tryouts and selection, the teams get to work. The However, building championship mock trial teams starts commitment of all players is tremendous. Once case files are long before each semester begins. Professor Wes Porter's released, each team does 3x3's--three hours three times per Summer Trial and Evidence (1st STEP) program provides week, often Friday nights and Sunday mornings due to the 25 lL summer students with rhe foundation necessary to busy work and class schedules of coaches and students. Teams compete at a national level. This past summer, the third work tirelessly developing case theory and themes, tackling annual STEP class followed in the path of each previous evidentiary hurdles, and making sure courtroom demeanor class- going through a week-long boot camp led by becomes second nature. With hard work and preparation professors and judges from across the nation, followed by come championships and awards, but also important skills eight weeks of intensive trial advocacy and evidence training that translate directly to practice after graduation. ABA Labor Regional Champions from left ro right: Dustin Helmer, Stmira CACJ Finalists from left to righr: Brooke Perkins, Aseil Mohmoud, Popal, Coach Julia Levisrskaia (JD 12), Zoe Tellman, and Lauren Whitted Jaclyn Merkis, and Brent Kling. The Pay-Off- Competitions McGeorge Collaboration CACJ National Criminal Mock Our first competition was an innovative competition GGU Trial Competition Law created, Mock Trial Collaboration. Teams tried cases from jury selection (voir dire) through closing arguments, in One week after the Stetson competition, GGU fielded a round robin fashion. Four teams-McGeorge, Southern another 3L team to compete in a national criminal competition against 24 teams. Our team advanced to the finals. After a Illinois, GGU, and a hybrid team of GGU and Southern Illinois students-had just three weeks to prepare. Our hard fought final trial against Northwestern, our team took second place in the competition. This team was coached by students walked away with several individual awards, including Best Advocates, Best Voir Dire, Best Opening GGU alumna VJ Chetty (JD 10). Statement, and Best Direct Examination. Teams were coached by GGU Law alumnus and former Baxter Fellow Erik Knuppel (JD 10). Visit the Advocacy Teaching Blog at ABA Labor and Employment http:!/advocacyteaching. blogspot.corn/20 13/ National Trial Advocacy 10/more-on-mock-trial-collaborations.html?m=l for the full article about this collaborative idea that is sweeping the nation. Competition One week later, two GGU teams geared up for a civil competition-the regional championships for the ABA Stetson National Civil Pretrial Labor and Employment competition. For two days, our Competition teams fought it out against schools from all over the country (although this was a regional, schools from Texas and South In October, four 3Ls traveled to Florida to compete in the Dakota were somehow in the San Francisco region).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • William Alsup
    William Alsup An Oral History Conducted by Leah McGarrigle 2016-2017 William Alsup An Oral History Conducted by Leah McGarrigle 2016-2017 Copyright © 2021 William Alsup, Leah McGarrigle All rights reserved. Copyright in the manuscript and recording is owned by William Alsup and Leah McGarrigle, who have made the materials available under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. It is recommended that this oral history be cited as follows: "William Alsup: An Oral History Conducted by Leah McGarrigle, 2016-2017”. Transcription by Christine Sinnott Book design by Anna McGarrigle Judge William Alsup was born in Mississippi in 1945 and lived there until he left for Harvard Law School in 1967. At Harvard, he earned a law degree plus a master’s degree in public policy from the Kennedy School of Government. In 1971–72, he clerked for Justice William O. Douglas of the United States Supreme Court and worked with him on the Abortion Cases and the “Trees Have Standing” case, among others. Alsup and his young family then returned to Mississippi, where he practiced civil rights law, went broke, and eventually relocated to San Francisco. There he be- came a trial lawyer, a practice interrupted by two years of appel- late practice as an Assistant to the Solicitor General in the United States Department of Justice (from 1978–80). In 1999, President Bill Clinton nominated him and the Senate conirmed him as a United States District Judge in San Francisco. He took the oath of oice on August 17, 1999, and serves still on active status.
    [Show full text]
  • The History, Content, Application and Influence of the Northern District of California’S Patent Local Rules
    THE HISTORY, CONTENT, APPLICATION AND INFLUENCE OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA’S PATENT LOCAL RULES James Ware† & Brian Davy†† Abstract On December 1, 2000, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California became the first district court to promulgate rules governing the content and timing of disclosures in patent-related cases. The Northern District’s conception of Patent Local Rules finds its origins in the concerns during the 1980’s and 1990’s, when the increasing cost and expense of civil litigation came under increasing attack from commentators and all three branches of the federal government. Despite efforts to improve the efficiency of civil litigation generally, patent litigation proved particularly burdensome on litigants and the courts. The Supreme Court’s decision in Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. only exacerbated this situation. The Northern District’s Patent Local Rules are specifically tailored to address the unique challenges that arise during patent litigation, particularly during the pretrial discovery process. The Rules require the patentee and the accused infringer to set forth detailed infringement and invalidity theories early in the case. The Rules also govern the content and timing of disclosures related to the claim construction hearing, an event unique to patent litigation that is often case-dispositive. The Northern District’s Patent Local Rules have been expressly endorsed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The Rules have also proven highly influential in other judicial districts, as evidenced by the adoption of substantially similar rules in a growing number of district courts. Substantive differences do exist, however, between the patent local rules of various district courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyer NEW DEAN TAKES CHARGE
    Stanford FALL 2004 FALL Lawyer NEW DEAN TAKES CHARGE Larry D. Kramer brings fresh ideas, lots of energy, and a willingness to stir things up a bit. Remember Stanford... F rom his family’s apricot orchard in Los Altos Hills, young Thomas Hawley could see Hoover Tower and hear the cheers in Stanford Stadium. “In those days my heroes were John Brodie and Chuck Taylor,” he says, “and my most prized possessions were Big Game programs.” Thomas transferred from Wesleyan University to Stanford as a junior in and two years later enrolled in the Law School, where he met John Kaplan. “I took every course Professor Kaplan taught,” says Thomas. “He was a brilliant, often outrageous teacher, who employed humor in an attempt to drive the law into our not always receptive minds.” In choosing law, Thomas followed in the footsteps of his father, Melvin Hawley (L.L.B. ’), and both grandfathers. “I would have preferred to be a professional quarterback or an opera singer,” he says (he fell in love with opera while at Stanford-in-Italy), “and I might well have done so but for a complete lack of talent.” An estate planning attorney on the Monterey Peninsula, Thomas has advised hundreds of families how to make tax-wise decisions concerning the distribution of their estates. When he decided the time had come to sell his rustic Carmel cottage, he took his own advice and put the property in a charitable remainder trust instead, avoiding the capital gains tax he otherwise would have paid upon sale. When the trust terminates, one-half of it will go to Stanford Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Republican Appointees and Judicial Discretion: Cases Studies from the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Era
    Republican Appointees and Judicial Discretion: Cases Studies From the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Era Professor David M. Zlotnicka Senior Justice Fellow – Open Society Institute Nothing sits more uncomfortably with judges than the sense that they have all the responsibility for sentencing but little of the power to administer it justly.1 Outline of the Report This Report explores Republican-appointed district court judge dissatisfaction with the sentencing regime in place during the Sentencing Guideline era.2 The body of the Report discusses my findings. Appendix A presents forty case studies which are the product of my research.3 Each case study profiles a Republican appointee and one or two sentencings by that judge that illustrates the concerns of this cohort of judges. The body of the Report is broken down as follows: Part I addresses four foundational issues that explain the purposes and relevance of the project. Parts II and III summarizes the broad arc of judicial reaction to aThe author is currently the Distinguished Service Professor of Law, Roger Williams University School of Law, J.D., Harvard Law School. During 2002-2004, I was a Soros Senior Justice Fellow and spent a year as a Visiting Scholar at the George Washington University Law Center and then as a Visiting Professor at the Washington College of Law. I wish to thank OSI and these law schools for the support and freedom to research and write. Much appreciation is also due to Dan Freed, Ian Weinstein, Paul Hofer, Colleen Murphy, Jared Goldstein, Emily Sack, and Michael Yelnosky for their helpful c omments on earlier drafts of this Report and the profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Pelican Bay State Prison Security Housing Unit (Shu Prisoners)
    Number 37 Summer 2011 Serving The Interests Of Prisoners And Their Loved Ones On The Outside For Over Twenty Years FORMAL COMPLAINT COMPLAINT ON HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND REQUEST FOR ACTION TO END OVER 20 YEARS OF STATE SANCTIONED TORTURE TO EXTRACT INFORMATION FROM OR CAUSE MENTAL ILLNESS TO CALIFORNIA’S PELICAN BAY STATE PRISON SECURITY HOUSING UNIT (SHU PRISONERS). By: SHU Short Corridor Inmates, Pelican Bay Prison are serving “term-to-life” sentences, and they have been eli- smaller—much of it inedible or bland diet every day for gible for parole for the last 5 to 25+ years, but they are told 20+ years). No exercise equipment is provided while I. INTRODUCTION: that if they want a chance to parole they have to debrief – most prisons furnish at least a pull-up, dip-bar in SHU his is a formal complaint and request for action to end period! units; all property privileges are severely restricted/de- 20+ years of state sanctioned torture in order to extract The CDCR-PBSP-SHU policies and practices summa- nied (compared to most long-term isolation units across Tinformation from or cause mental illness to California rized violate both the U.S. Constitution and International the U.S. (including Federal Supermax in Florence, inmates incarcerated indefi nitely in punitive isolation at Peli- law banning the use of torture and other cruel, inhumane, or Colorado). Recently all college and education programs can Bay State Prison Security Housing Units (PBSP-SHU), degrading treatment or punishment as a means of obtaining have been taken away from all PBSP-SHU inmates.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Legal History
    WESTERN LEGAL HISTORY THE JOURNAL OF THE NINTH JuDIcIAL CIRCUIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2 SUMMER/FALL 1999 Western Legal History is published semiannually, in spring and fall, by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society, 125 S. Grand Avenue, Pasadena, California 91105, (626) 795-0266/fax (626) 229-7462. The journal explores, analyzes, and presents the history of law, the legal profession, and the courts- particularly the federal courts-in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Western Legal History is sent to members of the NJCHS as well as members of affiliated legal historical societies in the Ninth Circuit. Membership is open to all. Membership dues (individuals and institutions): Patron, $1,000 or more; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499; Sustaining, $100- $249; Advocate, $50-$99; Subscribing (nonmembers of the bench and bar, lawyers in practice fewer than five years, libraries, and academic institutions), $25449; Membership dues (law firms and corporations): Founder, $3,000 or more; Patron, $1,000-$2,999; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499. For information regarding membership, back issues of Western Legal History, and other society publications and programs, please write or telephone the editor. POSTMASTER: Please send change of address to: Editor Western Legal History 125 S. Grand Avenue Pasadena, California 91105 Western Legal History disclaims responsibility for statements made by authors and for accuracy of endnotes. Copyright, 01999, Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society ISSN 0896-2189 The Editorial Board welcomes unsolicited manuscripts, books for review, and recommendations for the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • WESTERN LEGAL History
    WESTERN LEGAL HiSTORY THE JOURNAL OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY VoLUME 21, NUMBER 1 2008 Western Legal History is published semiannually, in spring and fall, by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society, 125 S. Grand Avenue, Pasadena, California 91105, (626) 795-0266/fax (626) 229-7476. The journal explores, analyzes, and presents the history of law, the legal profession, and the courts- particularly the federal courts-in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Western Legal History is sent to members of the NJCHS as well as members of affiliated legal historical societies in the Ninth Circuit. Membership is open to all. Membership dues (individuals and institutions): Patron, $1,000 or more; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499; Sustaining, $100-$249; Advocate, $50-$99; Subscribing (nonmembers of the bench and bar, lawyers in practice fewer than five years, libraries, and academic institutions), $25-$49. Membership dues (law firms and corporations): Founder, $3,000 or more; Patron, $1,000-$2,999; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499. For information regarding membership, back issues of Western Legal History, and other society publications and programs, please write or telephone the editor. POSTMASTER: Please send change of address to: Editor Western Legal History 125 S. Grand Avenue Pasadena, California 91105 Western Legal History disclaims responsibility for statements made by authors and for accuracy of endnotes. Copyright @2008, Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society ISSN 0896-2189 The Editorial Board welcomes unsolicited manuscripts, books for review, and recommendations for the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Judge Richard H. Chambers and His Pasadena Courthouse Caleb Langston
    WESTERN LEGAL HISTORY THE JOURNAL OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 19, NUMBERS 1 & 2 2006 Western Legal History is published semiannually, in spring and fall, by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society, 125 S. Grand Avenue, Pasadena, California 91105, (626) 795-0266/fax (626) 229-7476. The journal explores, analyzes, and presents the history of law, the legal profession, and the courts- particularly the federal courts-in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Western Legal History is sent to members of the NJCHS as well as members of affiliated legal historical societies in the Ninth Circuit. Membership is open to all, Membership dues (individuals and institutions): Patron, $1,000 or more; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499; Sustaining, $100-$249; Advocate, $50-$99; Subscribing (nonmembers of the bench and bar, lawyers in practice fewer than five years, libraries, and academic institutions), $25-$49. Membership dues (law firms and corporations): Founder, $3,000 or more; Patron, $1,000-$2,999; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250--$499. For information regarding membership, back issues of Western Legal History, and other society publications and programs, please write or telephone the editor. POSTMASTER: Please send change of address to: Editor Western Legal History 125 S. Grand Avenue Pasadena, California 91105 Western Legal History disclaims responsibility for statements made by authors and for accuracy of endnotes. Copyright C2006, Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society ISSN 0896-2189 The Editorial Board welcomes unsolicited manuscripts, books for review, and recommendations for the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • California Corrections: Confronting Institutional Crisis, Lethal Injection, and Sentencing Reform in 2007
    BROMBERG 10/1/2008 12:52:21 PM California Corrections: Confronting Institutional Crisis, Lethal Injection, and Sentencing Reform in 2007 Over the past several years, California has been awash in corrections reform, much of it mandated by legislation or the courts. The most significant developments have arisen in cases in the United States District Courts in California, which have ruled that compliance with the United States Constitution may require drastic restructuring of the prison system, sentencing guidelines, and lethal injection procedures. 1 In addition, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has proposed and signed off on significant legislation and reforms to the corrections and rehabilitative structure of California's prisons and parole revocation measures.2 This article focuses on some of the most significant changes of the past several years in three major areas: (1) prison overcrowding, (2) lethal injection, and (3) sentencing and parole. 1. CALIFORNIA'S PRISON CRISIS [I]t is an uncontested fact that, on average, an inmate in one of California's prisons needlessly dies every six to seven days due to constitutional deficiencies in the CDCR's [California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation] medical delivery system .... It is clear to the Court that this unconscionable degree of suffering and death is sure to continue if the system is not dramatically overhauled. 1. See Sonja Steptoe, California'sGrowing Prison Crisis, TIME, June 21, 2007, available at http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599.1635592.00.html?xid-feed-cnn-topics: see also John Pomfret, California's Crisis in Prison Systems a Threat to Public: Longer Sentences and Less Emphasis on Rehabilitation Create Problems, WASH.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Legal History
    WESTERN LEGAL HISTORY THE JOURNAL OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY COMMEMORATING THE CENTENNIAL OF THE JAMES R. BROWNING UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 1905-2005 VOLUME 18, NUMBERS 1 & 2 2005 Western Legal History is published semiannually, in spring and fall, by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society, 125 S. Grand Avenue, Pasadena, California 91105, (626) 795-0266/fax (626) 229-7476. The journal explores, analyzes, and presents the history of law, the legal profession, and the courts- particularly the federal courts-in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Western Legal History is sent to members of the NJCHS as well as members of affiliated legal historical societies in the Ninth Circuit. Membership is open to all. Membership dues (individuals and institutions): Patron, $1,000 or more; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499; Sustaining, $100- $249; Advocate, $50-$99; Subscribing (nonmembers of the bench and bar, lawyers in practice fewer than five years, libraries, and academic institutions), $25-$49. Membership dues (law firms and corporations): Founder, $3,000 or more; Patron, $1,000-$2,999; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499. For information regarding membership, back issues of Western Legal History, and other society publications and programs, please write or telephone the editor. POSTMASTER: Please send change of address to: Editor Western Legal History 125 S. Grand Avenue Pasadena, California 91105 Western Legal History disclaims responsibility for statements made by authors and for accuracy of endnotes. Copyright 02005, Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society ISSN 0896-2189 The Editorial Board welcomes unsolicited manuscripts, books for review, and recommendations for the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the American Women Making History and Culture: 1963-1982 Collection PRA.RS.001
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c83f4v6g Online items available Guide to the American Women Making History and Culture: 1963-1982 Collection PRA.RS.001 Jolene M. Beiser, MA, MLIS, Archivist Pacifica Radio Archives This finding aid was produced thanks to a matching grant from the National Historical Publications and Records Commission at the National Archives and Records Administration. Pacifica Radio Archives April 12, 2016 3729 Cahuenga Blvd., West North Hollywood, CA 91604 jolene at pacificaradioarchives dot org URL: http://pacificaradioarchives.org/ Guide to the American Women Making PRA.RS.001 1 History and Culture: 1963-1982 Collection PRA.RS.001 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Pacifica Radio Archives Title: Guide to the American Women Making History and Culture: 1963-1982 Collection creator: KPFA (Radio station : Berkeley, Calif.) creator: KPFK (Radio station : Los Angeles, Calif.) creator: KPFT-FM (Radio station : Houston, Tex.) creator: Pacifica Radio Archives creator: WBAI Radio (New York, N.Y.) creator: WPFW (Radio station : Washington, D.C.) Identifier/Call Number: PRA.RS.001 Physical Description: 2024 Reels Physical Description: 2.39 Terabytes Physical Description: 156 Linear Feet Date (bulk): 1963-1982 Date (inclusive): 1944-1994 Abstract: The American Women Making History and Culture: 1963-1982 collection includes 2,024 reel-to-reel tapes and 2,024 WAV files preserved as part of the Pacifica Radio Archives’ 2013-2016 “American Women Making History and Culture: 1963-1982” (“American Women”) preservation project. The recordings were selected as an “artificial collection” to document the Women’s movement and second-wave feminism as it was broadcast on the Pacifica network.
    [Show full text]
  • BUSINESS [9^ Shultz to Set Groundwork for Summit
    to - MANCHESTER HERALD. Tuesday. July 30, 1985 MANCHESTER FOCUS U.S./W ORLD WEATHER \ BUSINESS MMH census stable Barbecues to go: Speculation increases Heavy rains tonight; after decline in 1984 Try these recipes on Gemayel’s ouster clearing Thursday ... page 2 Business In Brief Car buyers beware ... page 3 ... page 11 ... page 5 Balloon loans are risky alternative owe money if the bank determines that you put on too If you’re in the market for a car, have you been much mileage (a sticky question at best) or didn t asked if you would like to buy with a "balloon loan"? maintain it in top shape. ^ ^ .ho* This type of loan is being actively promoted these The central point; Don’t be fooled by the pitch that days because, with a balloon, you can buy a more Your you can buy more car with a balloon loan. M p r a l J i expensive car than you could with conventional Money's "You’re opening yourself to significant risk, says MmthtBtn financing — and you may not be fully aware that three Stephen Brobeck, executive director of the Consumer ......... * \AyorlnAftdfl\/Wednesday, JiiK July 31. 1985 — Single copy: 25C or four years in the future, you must come up with the Federation of America. "Generally speaking, if you Manchester, Conn. — A City of Village Charm balloon or forfeit the car. Worth can’t afford a traditional installment loan, you won t Balloon auto loans closely resemble balloon Sylvia Porter be able to afford a balloon loan.” mortgages: You pay lower monthly installments, but Consider: Most owners keep cars for around eight at the loan’s maturity you must come up with a large years.
    [Show full text]