Western Legal History
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
PETITIONER Vs
AMENDED (3) No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES LINDA ANN WRIGHT -PETITIONER vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. -RESPONDENT(S) ON PETITION FOR AN EXTRAORDINARY WRIT FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT OF MANDAMUS LINDA ANN WRIGHT 300 Elizabeth Drive. Apartment 3108 Pittsburgh. Pennsylvania. 15220 (4121715-7733 IV. QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Was there a concerted effort, from 2007-Present to deny petitioner her Due Process, under the 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the U.S.? 2. If the Petitioner is not an Attorney, and several Judges consider her lacking, should they have Authorized Counsel since she produced the facts? 3. Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the denial of Disqualification of Judges deny the Petitioner, Due Process and Redress in not having an investigation? 4. Was the Chief Judge serving as counsel for the Named Judges? Should she have recused herself, was she involved in the naming of the Federal Building, named after one of the Judges? 5. Was Judge Owens while serving in the Texas Supreme Court, aware of Case No. 15-00214, in USDC Texas Northern District, did it affect her Decision? 6. Did the Fifth Circuit Appellate Review Board in not calling for an investigation into the facts submitted by Appellant/ Petitioner Obstructed Justice and Rule Article V, 28 U..C § 358., therefor denying Due Process, Redress? 7. Was there a concerted effort by California, Texas, and the U.S. Courts, to deny Petitioner’s Constitutional, Civil, Financial Rights as an American Citizen? 8. -
CONGRESSIONAL Recoltd-HOUSE. DECEMBER 3
. 2 CONGRESSIONAL RECOltD-HOUSE. DECEMBER 3, .Ma.ssa;chusetts-Henry L. Dawes and George F. Hoar. ARKANSAS. Clifton R. Breckinridge. John H. Rogers. JJ!ichigan-Omar D. Conger and Thomas W. Palmer. Poindexter Dunn. Samuel W. Peel. Minnesota-Samuel J. R. McMillan and Dwight 1\I. Sabin. James K. Jones. Mi.ssissippi=-James z. George and Lucius Q. C. Lamar. CALIFORNIA. Missouri-Francis M. Cockrell and George G. Vest. Charles A. Sumner. James H. Budd. John R. Glascock. Barclay Henley. Nebraska-Charles F. l\Ianderson and Charles H. VanWyck. WilliamS. Rosecrans. Pleasant B. Tully. Nevada-James G. Fair. New Hampshire-Henry W. Blair and Austin F. Pike. COLORADO. New Jersey-John R. McPherson and William J. Sewell. James B. Belford. New York-Elbridge G. Lapham and Warner Miller. CONNECTICUT. North Carolina-Matt. W. Ransom and Zebulon B. Vance. William W. Eaton. John T. Wait. Ohio-George H. Pendleton and John Sherman. Charles L. 1\fit.<Jhell. Edward W. Seymour. Oregon-Joseph N. Dolph and James H. Slater. DEL.AW .ARE. Pennsylvmtia-J ohn I. Mitchell. Charles B. Lore. Rhode Jslan~Nelson W. Aldrich. FLORIDA.. Sottth Camlina-M. C. Butler ~d Wade Hampton. Robert H. M. Davidson. Horatio Bisbee, jr. Tennessee-Isham G. Harris and Howell E. Jaekson. GEORGIA. Texas-Richard Coke and Sam. Bell Maxey. Thomas Hardeman. James H. Blount. Vermont-George F. Edmunds and Justin S. Morrill. John C. Nicholls. Judson C. Clements. Virginia-William .Mahone and Harrison H. Riddleberger. · Henry G. Turner. Seaborn Reese. N. Charles F. Crisp. Allen D. Candler. West Virginia-Johnson Camden and John E. -
Original Sin and Judicial Independence: Providing Accountability for Justices
William and Mary Law Review VOLUME 50 NO. 4, 2009 ORIGINAL SIN AND JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE: PROVIDING ACCOUNTABILITY FOR JUSTICES PAUL D. CARRINGTON & ROGER C. CRAMTON * TABLE OF CONTENTS I. A DEFINING CHALLENGE ............................ 1106 A. The Founding Vision ............................ 1109 1. The Federalists’ “Ark of Safety” .................. 1115 B. Removing a Disabled Judge: The Pickering Case ..... 1128 C. The Impeachment of Justice Chase: Are Justices Different? ........................... 1141 1. How To Remove A Justice .................... 1144 CONCLUSION ....................................... 1152 * Paul D. Carrington, Professor of Law, Duke University; Roger C. Cramton, Stevens Professor of Law Emeritus, Cornell University. Thanks to James Boyle, Henry Monaghan, Randall Roth, and Sanford Levinson for their helpful comments and to Michael Schobel for his research assistance. Thanks also to those attending the conference on The Citizen Lawyer presented at the Marshall-Wythe School of Law at the College of William and Mary, to whom this Essay was presented on February 8, 2008, and to the Duke Law faculty workshop. 1105 1106 WILLIAM AND MARY LAW REVIEW [Vol. 50:1105 I. A DEFINING CHALLENGE The independence of the judiciary is an enduring and defining objective of the legal profession. We lawyers, of all citizens, have the greatest stake in shielding judges from intimidation or reward. And that task of protecting judicial independence stands today at the very top of the agenda of the American legal profession. 1 The integrity of law and legal institutions requires more than just the protection of judges. It is equally dependent on the willingness and ability of judges to maintain virtuous disinterest in their work. 2 Some might explain their occasional failings as manifesta- tions of the original sin inherited from Adam; 3 whatever their source, the proclivities of judges to indulge or celebrate themselves are perpetual temptations and judicial self-restraint is a perpetual challenge. -
K:\Fm Andrew\41 to 50\49.Xml
FORTY-NINTH CONGRESS MARCH 4, 1885, TO MARCH 3, 1887 FIRST SESSION—December 7, 1885, to August 5, 1886 SECOND SESSION—December 6, 1886, to March 3, 1887 SPECIAL SESSION OF THE SENATE—March 4, 1885, to April 2, 1885 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—THOMAS A. HENDRICKS, 1 of Indiana PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—JOHN SHERMAN, 2 of Ohio; JOHN J. INGALLS, 3 of Kansas SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—ANSON G. MCCOOK, of New York SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—WILLIAM P. CANADAY, of North Carolina SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—JOHN G. CARLISLE, 4 of Kentucky CLERK OF THE HOUSE—JOHN B. CLARK, JR., 5 of Missouri SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—JOHN P. LEEDOM, of Ohio DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—SAMUEL DONALDSON, of Tennessee POSTMASTER OF THE HOUSE—LYCURGUS DALTON ALABAMA Samuel W. Peel, Bentonville Joseph R. Hawley, Hartford SENATORS CALIFORNIA REPRESENTATIVES John T. Morgan, Selma SENATORS John R. Buck, Hartford James L. Pugh, Eufaula John F. Miller, 9 San Francisco Charles L. Mitchell, New Haven REPRESENTATIVES George Hearst, 10 San Francisco John T. Wait, Norwich James T. Jones, Demopolis Abram P. Williams, 11 San Francisco Edward W. Seymour, Litchfield Hilary A. Herbert, Montgomery Leland Stanford, San Francisco William C. Oates, Abbeville REPRESENTATIVES DELAWARE Alexander C. Davidson, Uniontown Barclay Henley, Santa Rosa SENATORS Thomas W. Sadler, Prattville J. A. Louttit, Stockton Joseph McKenna, Suisun Thomas F. Bayard, 12 Wilmington John M. Martin, Tuscaloosa 13 William H. Forney, Jacksonville W. W. Morrow, San Francisco George Gray, New Castle Joseph Wheeler, Wheeler Charles N. -
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Case3:07-cv-00109-VRW Document128 Filed07/07/10 Page1 of 11 1 Jon B. Eisenberg, California Bar No. 88278 ([email protected]) William N. Hancock, California Bar No. 104501 ([email protected]) 2 Eisenberg & Hancock LLP 1970 Broadway, Suite 1200 • Oakland, CA 94612 3 510.452.258l – Fax 510.452.3277 4 Steven Goldberg, Oregon Bar No. 75134 ([email protected]) River Park Center, Suite 300 • 205 SE Spokane St.• Portland, OR 97202 5 503.445-4622 – Fax 503.238.7501 6 Thomas H. Nelson, Oregon Bar No. 78315 ([email protected]) P.O. Box 1211, 24525 E. Welches Road • Welches, OR 97067 7 503.622.3123 - Fax: 503.622.1438 8 Zaha S. Hassan, California Bar No. 184696 ([email protected]) P.O. Box 1168• Lake Oswego, OR 97034 9 360.213.9737 - Fax 866.399.5575 10 J. Ashlee Albies, Oregon Bar No. 051846 ([email protected]) Steenson, Schumann, Tewksbury, Creighton and Rose, PC 11 815 S.W. Second Ave., Suite 500 • Portland, OR 97204 503.221.1792 – Fax 503.223.1516 12 Lisa R. Jaskol, California Bar No. 138769 ([email protected]) 13 610 S. Ardmore Ave.• Los Angeles, CA 90005 213.385.2977 – Fax 213.385.9089 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc., Wendell Belew and Asim Ghafoor 15 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 IN RE NATIONAL SECURITY ) MDL Docket No. 06-1791 VRW 18 AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS ) RECORDS LITIGATION 19 ) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR This Document Relates Solely To: ) ATTORNEY’S FEES 20 ) Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc., et ) 21 al. -
Class of 2003 Finals Program
School of Law One Hundred and Seventy-Fourth FINAL EXERCISES The Lawn May 18, 2003 1 Distinction 2 High Distinction 3 Highest Distinction 4 Honors 5 High Honors 6 Highest Honors 7 Distinguished Majors Program School of Law Finals Speaker Mortimer M. Caplin Former Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service Mortimer Caplin was born in New York in 1916. He came to Charlottesville in 1933, graduating from the College in 1937 and the Law School in 1940. During the Normandy invasion, he served as U.S. Navy beachmaster and was cited as a member of the initial landing force on Omaha Beach. He continued his federal service as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service under President Kennedy from 1961 to 1964. When he entered U.Va. at age 17, Mr. Caplin committed himself to all aspects of University life. From 1933-37, he was a star athlete in the University’s leading sport—boxing—achieving an undefeated record for three years in the mid-1930s and winning the NCAA middleweight title in spite of suffering a broken hand. He also served as coach of the boxing team and was president of the University Players drama group. At the School of Law, he was editor-in-chief of the Virginia Law Review and graduated as the top student in his class. In addition to his deep commitment to public service, he is well known for his devotion to teaching and to the educational process and to advancing tax law. Mr. Caplin taught tax law at U.Va. from 1950-61, while serving as president of the Atlantic Coast Conference. -
Download out of the Ashes
OUTOUT OF OF THE THE ASHES ASHES THE HISTORYHISTORY OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX Early Life Along the Salt River and the land became fertile. The ultimate fate of this ancient society, however, is a mystery. undreds of years before any of the cities The accepted belief is that it was destroyed by in the eastern part of our country were a prolonged drought. Roving Indians, Hso much as clearings in the wilderness, observing the Pueblo Grande ruins and the vast a well established, civilized community canal system these people left behind, gave populated the land we know as Phoenix. The them the name “Ho Ho Kam” – meaning the Pueblo Grande ruins, which were occupied people who have gone. between 700 A.D. and 1400 A.D., are a Phoenix’s modern history begins in the testament to our city’s ancient roots. second half of the 19th century. In 1867, Jack The wide Salt River ran through the Valley Swilling of Wickenburg stopped to rest his of the Sun, but there was little rain or melting horse at the foot of the north slopes of the snow to moisten the brown earth from river to White Tank Mountains. He looked down and mountain range on either side. But former across the expansive Salt River Valley and his residents were industrious, enterprising and eyes caught the rich gleam of the brown, dry imaginative. They built an irrigation system, soil turned up by the horse’s hooves. He saw consisting mostly of some 135 miles of canals, 1 farm land, predominately free of rocks, and in a place beyond the reach of heavy frost or snow. -
Spring Volume 9 Number 1
Spring 1972 Volume 9 Number 1 Ramsey County History Published by the RAMSEY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY Editor: Virginia Brainard Kunz Contents Spring Old Federal Courts Building — Beautiful, Unique — Its Style 1972 of A rchitecture Faces Extinction Volume 9 By Eileen Michels................................. A Teacher Looks Back at PTA, 4-H — Number 1 And How a Frog in a Desk Drawer Became a Lesson in Biology By Alice Olson....................................... Forgotten Pioneers . XII....................... North St. Paul’s ‘Manufactories’ Come-back After 1893 Bust’ By Edward J. Lettermann..................... RAMSEY COUNTY HISTORY is published semi ON THE COVER: The Old Federal Courts Building, annually and copyrighted, 1972, by the Ramsey County viewed from across Rice Park about 1905. With the Historical Society, 2097 Larpenteur Avenue West, St. park itself, and the Minneapolis Public Library directly Paul, Minnesota. Membership in the Society carries across from it, the Old Federal Courts Building lends with it a subscription to Ramsey County History. Single a sense of community to the area. issues sell for $1.50. Correspondence concerning con tributions should be addressed to the editor. The Society assumes no responsibility for statements made by con tributors. Manuscripts and other editorial material are welcomed but no payment can be made for contribu ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The editor is indebted to tions. All articles and other editorial material submitted Eugene Becker and Dorothy Gimmestad of the Minne will be carefully read and published, if accepted, as sota Historical Society’s audio-visual staff for their help space permits. with the pictures used in this issue. 2 Old Federal Courts Building-- Beautiful, Unique-- OfArchitecture Faces Extinction By Eileen Michels UILT at a cost of nearly $2,500,000 B between 1892 and 1901, the United States Post Office, Court House and Customs House, known colloquially now as the Old Federal Courts Building, was the pride of downtown St. -
Loyola Lawyer Law School Publications
Loyola Lawyer Law School Publications Spring 3-1-1995 Loyola Lawyer Loyola Law School - Los Angeles Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/loyola_lawyer Repository Citation Loyola Law School - Los Angeles, "Loyola Lawyer" (1995). Loyola Lawyer. 13. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/loyola_lawyer/13 This Magazine is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Publications at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola Lawyer by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOS ANGELES ON BEING THE DEAN May there be many a sunznzeT morning when, you come into harbors seen foT the fint time; GRADUATION REMARKS DELIVERED may you stop at Phoenician trading stations BY THE DEAN AT to buy fine things, THE 74TH ANNUAL COMMENCEMENT motheT of peaT! and coTal, anzbeT and ebony EXERCISES and may you visit mq.ny Egyptian cities to gatheT stoTes of knowledge [Tom their scholan" Well, it's almost over- after studying all He goes on to soy: those rules about choses in action, fertile octogenari- "Keep Ithaka always in youT mind. ans and covenants run- •••• ArTiving there is what you are destined for. ning with the land, you ore Dean Gerald T. McLaughlin about to graduate. You But do not hurTy the journey at all. hove come full circle- Better if it lasts foT years, Loyola Low School admitted you; it taught you and now it graduates you. so you aTe old by the time you Teach the island, All of us in the Loyola Low School community- facu lty, staff and alumni wealthy with all you have gained on the way, ore proud of you and your accomplishments. -
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The
Case 2:17-cv-01826-TSZ Document 153 Filed 06/11/20 Page 1 of 171 1 THE HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 10 KEVIN PINE, individually and on behalf Case No. 17-cv-1826 11 of all others similarly situated, DECLARATION OF DANIEL M. 12 Plaintiff, HUTCHINSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 13 v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS, AND SERVICE AWARDS TO THE 14 A PLACE FOR MOM, INC., a Delaware PLAINTIFFS corporation, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DECLARATION OF DANIEL M. HUTCHINSON LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Case No. 17-cv-1826 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor 1836300.2 San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Tel. 415.956.1000 • Fax 415.956.1008 Case 2:17-cv-01826-TSZ Document 153 Filed 06/11/20 Page 2 of 171 1 I, Daniel M. Hutchinson, declare as follows: 2 1. I am a partner in of the law firm of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP 3 (“LCHB”), co-counsel of record for Plaintiff in this matter. 4 2. I am admitted to practice pro hac vice before this Court and am a member in good 5 standing of the bar of the State of California; the United States District Court for the Central, 6 Northern, and Southern Districts of California; the United States District Court for the Eastern 7 District of Wisconsin; and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, and 8 Eleventh Circuits. -
District Clerk
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ,.p.l I r r " 28 2 5 1.0 :: 11111 . _ 11111 . 3 2 I IIIII~~ n~M1. 11111 - . 3 6 Ik\ 11111 . BOO 4 0 Ii'-2. 001,I~. • 0 I• I :ij'",li IIIII~~ 111111.8 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 150mm ->-----~-..... 6" UNI,TED STATES COURT. DIRECTORY Sf March 1, 1986 U.S. DepFrtment of Justice Natlonallnstitute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originallng it. Points of view or opinions staled in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this ~l:lted material has been granted by • • Publlc DOmaln Lnllted States Court Directory to the National Criminal JUstice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis " ) sion of the epp.y.ri:ght owner. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 I 053 03 • UNITED STATES COURT DIRECTORY Issued by: The Administrative Office of the United States Courts Washington, D.C. 20544 Contents: Personnel Division Office of the Chief (633-6115) Printing & Distribution: Administrative Services Division Printing & Distribution Facility (763-1865) • • The information in this Directory is current as of March I, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS Supreme Court ...................................................................................................................... • United -
U.S. Post Office and Court House: Draft Nomination
NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 U.S. POST OFFICE AND COURTHOUSE (JAMES R. BROWNING U.S. COURT OF APPEALS) Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: U.S. Post Office and Courthouse (James R. Browning U.S. Court of Appeals) Other Name/Site Number: 2. LOCATION Street & Number: 95-99 Seventh Street (Northeast Corner of Mission and Seventh Streets) Not for publication: City/Town: San Francisco Vicinity: San Francisco North State: CA County: San Francisco Code: 075 Zip Code: 94102 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: Building(s): X_ Public-Local: District: ___ Public-State: ___ Site: ___ Public-Federal: X Structure: ___ Object: ___ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 1 buildings sites structures objects Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 1 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: N/A NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form ((Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 U.S. POST OFFICE AND COURTHOUSE (JAMES R. BROWNING U.S. COURT OF APPEALS) Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Plaaces Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that tthis ____ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.