DOCSLIB.ORG

National Docketing Association Home Page About Us William Mckay Calendar of Events

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Docketing Association Home Page About Us William Mckay Calendar of Events NNaattiioonnaall DDoocckkeettiinngg AAssssoocciiaattiioonn Calendaring our future together. January 29, 2016 Volume 3, Number 1 In This Issue President's Message President's Message Editor's Note NDA Newsletter Welcome to the January 2016 NDA Newsletter! Committee NDA Welcomes Mary February is upon us. It is hard to believe January has Beaudrow as Treasurer almost come and gone. I hope you all read our annual journal last month. The white papers by our vendors were NDA Comics amazing! I want to thank all of our sponsors for their New York State Updates time, articles and ads. We are so proud of the Journal Delaware State Update that we are sending it to some organizations thinking of becoming a formal chapter of the NDA. Well done and once again thank you Ninth Circuit Change for for sponsoring the NDA! Submitting Seal Materials In the coming weeks we will be announcing the location of our 2016 NDA San Francisco Conference. We are looking to add to our committees to assist in planning Chapter the conference. Please contact me if you are interested in joining a CA State Rule Changes – committee. I know you will find the work enjoyable and rewarding. I would Civil also like to welcome our new Chapters that have joined the NDA in the past year. At this time last year chapters were just a thought. Thank you to Olivia NDA Board Members Bane and the Membership Committee for all their hard work! Stay warm, National Docketing spring will be here soon! As always, if you have any questions or Association Home Page suggestions do not hesitate to contact me at About us [email protected]. Calendar of Events Membership Annual Conference Sponsors Contact us LinkedIn JoAnn Disanti Facebook Twitter DISCLAIMER: This material has been prepared for instructional purposes only, and is not intended to be relied upon in the practice of law In This Issue Editor's Note President's Message Editor's Note The Newsletter Committee is looking forward to its first NDA Newsletter full year working on the newsletter. I would like to thank Committee all the members that helped out last year with edits, comments and suggestions. As a reminder, we are still in NDA Welcomes Mary the early stages of the newsletter so the more we hear Beaudrow as Treasurer from you the more we will be able to improve the NDA Comics newsletter. So what should we be looking forward to from the 2016 newsletters? New York State Updates Delaware State Update First, the San Francisco Chapter has been off to a great start with their Ninth Circuit Change for contributions and that should continue throughout the year. With the success Submitting Seal of the San Francisco Chapter, we are hoping the Washington, DC and New Materials York Chapters will follow the San Francisco lead. Second, the Intellectual NDA San Francisco Property Group will be conducting three separate surveys regarding their Chapter practice, which should produce topics for future submissions to the newsletter. Please be on the lookout for the first survey in a few weeks. CA State Rule Changes – Third, we plan to broaden our topics for the vendor submission articles so Civil that we can continue to expand our knowledge base. NDA Board Members In this year’s first edition you will find the latest court updates from California, Delaware, New York & the Ninth Circuit, plus we welcome Mary Beaudrow as our new Treasurer. National Docketing Association Home Page About us William McKay Calendar of Events Membership Annual Conference Sponsors Contact us LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Page | 2 In This Issue NDA Newsletter Committee President's Message Editor's Note William G. McKay Lisa Cadungug NDA Newsletter NDA Technology & NDA Newsletter Committee Publication Committee Chair Co-Editor NDA Welcomes Mary Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP McEwen Gisvold LLP [email protected] [email protected] Beaudrow as Treasurer Laurie Jennings NDA Comics Elaine Screechfield NDA Newsletter NDA Education Committee Chair New York State Updates Co-Editor Morrison & Foerster LLP Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP Delaware State Update [email protected] [email protected] Ninth Circuit Change for John Hagel Lindsay Owen Submitting Seal NDA Technology Committee NDA Technology Committee Materials Technical Analyst Technical Analyst NDA San Francisco Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP White & Case LLP Chapter [email protected] [email protected] CA State Rule Changes – Civil NDA Board Members Attention writers! We are looking for articles to be published in next month’s NDA newsletter. Articles need to be original or have National Docketing consent from the author to be reproduced. If you would like to submit an article for the NDA Newsletter please click the link below: Association Home Page About us Click here to submit an article for the NDA newsletter Calendar of Events Membership Annual Conference Sponsors Contact us LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Page | 3 In This Issue NDA Welcomes Mary Beaudrow as Treasurer President's Message Editor's Note NDA Newsletter Please join me in welcoming Mary J. Beaudrow as the National Docketing Committee Association’s new Treasurer. Mary is a Senior Docket Coordinator at Morrison & Foerster LLP. Ms. Beaudrow has been employed in the legal field for over NDA Welcomes Mary thirty years, spending much of that time working in the attorney service Beaudrow as Treasurer business. Mary currently serves as President for Legal Secretaries, NDA Comics Incorporated, and she is a past president of California Association of Legal New York State Updates Support Professionals. She is a member of the National Docketing Association (and its SF Bay Area Chapter) and of Mt. Diablo Legal Professionals Delaware State Update Association. She has lectured at a number of forums, including San Francisco Ninth Circuit Change for Legal Professionals Association, Livermore-Amador Legal Professionals Submitting Seal Association, and the Bay Area Legal Forum. Mary can be reached at Materials [email protected]. NDA San Francisco Chapter CA State Rule Changes – Civil William McKay NDA Board Members NDA Comics National Docketing Association Home Page About us Calendar of Events Membership Annual Conference Sponsors Contact us LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Jade Weaver Page | 4 In This Issue President's Message New York State Updates Editor's Note NDA Newsletter Out of State and Foreign Attorneys Temporary Practice Committee NDA Welcomes Mary Beaudrow as Treasurer The Court of Appeals has amended its rules to add a new Part 523 pertaining to the temporary practice of law in New York by out-of-state and foreign attorneys. NDA Comics The amendment sets forth the circumstances under which an attorney not New York State Updates admitted in New York may provide temporary legal services in the State. An Delaware State Update attorney providing such temporary legal services may not establish an office or Ninth Circuit Change for other systematic presence in the State or hold out to the public or otherwise Submitting Seal represent that the attorney is admitted to practice here. Additionally, an attorney Materials practicing pursuant to Part 523 is subject to the New York Rules of Professional NDA San Francisco Conduct and the disciplinary authority of this State. Chapter CA State Rule Changes – The Court also has amended its Rules for the Registration of In-house Counsel Civil (Part 522). Under the newly amended rules, registration is now available to a NDA Board Members foreign attorney who is a member in good standing of a recognized legal profession in a non-United States jurisdiction, the members of which are admitted to practice as lawyers or counselors at law or the equivalent and subject to effective regulation by a duly constituted professional body or public authority. The rule amendments became effective December 30, 2015. To view a copy of National Docketing the Court's orders amending the rules please click here: Association Home Page About us http://nationaldocketing.org:80/resources/Documents/2016%20NDA%20Newslet Calendar of Events ters%20and%20Journal/Liniked%20files%20in%20newsletter%202016/NY%20 Membership State%20Practice.pdf Annual Conference Sponsors New Service Rule Contact us New York State is no different than any other state, meaning it has its share of LinkedIn strange rules, one of which became law this month. When the act of serving an Facebook interlocutory document for a New York State case is by first class mail, outside Twitter the state, but within the United States, six days shall be added to the prescribed period. An interlocutory document served within New York shall have five days added to the prescribed period. Why did New York State not just make it six days for service regardless of serving within the state or not? Making it six days for any situation would make it easier for a docketing professional having to figure out where the mailing actually took place. When in doubt it might be the better practice to just play it safe each time. Please find below a section from CPLR 2103 that mentions the new section. Rule 2103. Service of papers. (a) Who can serve. Except where otherwise prescribed by law or order of court, papers may be served by any person not a party of the age of eighteen years or over. (b) Upon an attorney. Except where otherwise prescribed by law or order of court, Page | 5 papers to be served upon a party in a pending action shall be served upon the In This Issue party's attorney. Where the same attorney appears for two or more parties, only one copy need be served upon the attorney. Such service upon an attorney shall be made: President's Message 1. by delivering the paper to the attorney personally; or Editor's Note 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PETITIONER Vs
    AMENDED (3) No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES LINDA ANN WRIGHT -PETITIONER vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. -RESPONDENT(S) ON PETITION FOR AN EXTRAORDINARY WRIT FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT OF MANDAMUS LINDA ANN WRIGHT 300 Elizabeth Drive. Apartment 3108 Pittsburgh. Pennsylvania. 15220 (4121715-7733 IV. QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Was there a concerted effort, from 2007-Present to deny petitioner her Due Process, under the 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the U.S.? 2. If the Petitioner is not an Attorney, and several Judges consider her lacking, should they have Authorized Counsel since she produced the facts? 3. Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the denial of Disqualification of Judges deny the Petitioner, Due Process and Redress in not having an investigation? 4. Was the Chief Judge serving as counsel for the Named Judges? Should she have recused herself, was she involved in the naming of the Federal Building, named after one of the Judges? 5. Was Judge Owens while serving in the Texas Supreme Court, aware of Case No. 15-00214, in USDC Texas Northern District, did it affect her Decision? 6. Did the Fifth Circuit Appellate Review Board in not calling for an investigation into the facts submitted by Appellant/ Petitioner Obstructed Justice and Rule Article V, 28 U..C § 358., therefor denying Due Process, Redress? 7. Was there a concerted effort by California, Texas, and the U.S. Courts, to deny Petitioner’s Constitutional, Civil, Financial Rights as an American Citizen? 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Options for Federal Judicial Screening Committees Second Edition September 2011 (2D
    Options for Federal Judicial Screening Committees Second Edition September 2011 (2d. ed.) OPTIONS FOR FEDERAL JUDICIAL SCREENING COMMITTEES: Where They Are in Place, How They Operate, and What to Consider in Establishing and Managing Them The Governance Institute, the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System at the University of Denver (IAALS), and Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution have revised the June 2010 first edition of this guide, and will continue to issue revisions periodically. It provides United States senators, other federal legislators, and their staffs with information about creating committees to screen potential judicial and law enforcement position nominees; provides them and committee members with information about committee operations; and provides others interested in federal judicial selection with information about an often- overlooked aspect of the process. It is not a “best practices” manual, in part because relatively little is known about how such committees work and even less about what seems to work best. The most current version of the guide is available at: www.du.edu/legalinstitute and www.brookings.edu/experts/wheelerr.aspx This guide was authored principally by: Russell Wheeler, president of the Governance Institute and a Visiting Fellow in the Brookings Institution’s Governance Studies program. He has served on the IAALS Board of Advisors since its creation in 2006. Rebecca Love Kourlis, executive director of IAALS. She served on Senator Ken Salazar’s screening committee and co-chaired the committee that Senators Mark Udall and Michael Bennet appointed to screen candidates for two District of Colorado vacancies. (Malia Reddick, director of judicial programs for the Institute, assists with ongoing revisions.) The Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System (IAALS) is a national, independent research center dedicated to continuous improvement of the process and culture of the civil justice system.
    [Show full text]
  • William Alsup
    William Alsup An Oral History Conducted by Leah McGarrigle 2016-2017 William Alsup An Oral History Conducted by Leah McGarrigle 2016-2017 Copyright © 2021 William Alsup, Leah McGarrigle All rights reserved. Copyright in the manuscript and recording is owned by William Alsup and Leah McGarrigle, who have made the materials available under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. It is recommended that this oral history be cited as follows: "William Alsup: An Oral History Conducted by Leah McGarrigle, 2016-2017”. Transcription by Christine Sinnott Book design by Anna McGarrigle Judge William Alsup was born in Mississippi in 1945 and lived there until he left for Harvard Law School in 1967. At Harvard, he earned a law degree plus a master’s degree in public policy from the Kennedy School of Government. In 1971–72, he clerked for Justice William O. Douglas of the United States Supreme Court and worked with him on the Abortion Cases and the “Trees Have Standing” case, among others. Alsup and his young family then returned to Mississippi, where he practiced civil rights law, went broke, and eventually relocated to San Francisco. There he be- came a trial lawyer, a practice interrupted by two years of appel- late practice as an Assistant to the Solicitor General in the United States Department of Justice (from 1978–80). In 1999, President Bill Clinton nominated him and the Senate conirmed him as a United States District Judge in San Francisco. He took the oath of oice on August 17, 1999, and serves still on active status.
    [Show full text]
  • March 3, 2015 Spring OCI 2015 Bidding
    Having trouble viewing this email?Click here March 3, 2015 Spring OCI 2015 Bidding Deadlines by Session The Spring On-Campus Interview Program (OCI) has two components: on-campus interviews and resume collections. OCI offers public interest organizations, government agencies, and law firms an opportunity to interview first and second year students for summer positions and third year students for post-graduate positions. Further details about Spring OCI have been sent to you in a separate email. Alumni Directory RESUME COLLECTIONS: Professor Leticia Saucedo, UC Davis School of Law Job Search Resources Session: Spring 2015 (Research Assistant Resume Collection) Bidding Deadline: March 20 at 11:00pm Class Level: 1L, 2L Symplicity Session: Spring 2015 (San Bernardino Public Defender - Post Grad) Career News Archives Bidding Deadline: April 1 at 11pm Archive of Recorded For questions pertaining to the OCI process please contact Kim Thomas at [email protected]. CSO Presentations Walk-In Hours: Ms. JD 7th Annual Conference on Women in the 11 AM - Noon & 4 - 5 PM, Monday - Thursday; Law: Stronger Together 11 AM - 1 PM, Friday 3Ls: 12 PM - 1 PM, Tuesday - The conference is this week, Thursday March 5 thought Friday March Thursday (with Lisa Carlock); 6, 2015 at UC Hastings College of the Law. Register here. 12 PM -1 PM, Monday and Friday (with Marian Lee). Thursday, March 5th 3Ls may also access general Second Annual Ms. JD Honors Award Reception will walk-ins. recognize women who have demonstrated passion for their careers and shared that passion with other men and women. At this Need more than a few ceremony, Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • The History, Content, Application and Influence of the Northern District of California’S Patent Local Rules
    THE HISTORY, CONTENT, APPLICATION AND INFLUENCE OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA’S PATENT LOCAL RULES James Ware† & Brian Davy†† Abstract On December 1, 2000, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California became the first district court to promulgate rules governing the content and timing of disclosures in patent-related cases. The Northern District’s conception of Patent Local Rules finds its origins in the concerns during the 1980’s and 1990’s, when the increasing cost and expense of civil litigation came under increasing attack from commentators and all three branches of the federal government. Despite efforts to improve the efficiency of civil litigation generally, patent litigation proved particularly burdensome on litigants and the courts. The Supreme Court’s decision in Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. only exacerbated this situation. The Northern District’s Patent Local Rules are specifically tailored to address the unique challenges that arise during patent litigation, particularly during the pretrial discovery process. The Rules require the patentee and the accused infringer to set forth detailed infringement and invalidity theories early in the case. The Rules also govern the content and timing of disclosures related to the claim construction hearing, an event unique to patent litigation that is often case-dispositive. The Northern District’s Patent Local Rules have been expressly endorsed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The Rules have also proven highly influential in other judicial districts, as evidenced by the adoption of substantially similar rules in a growing number of district courts. Substantive differences do exist, however, between the patent local rules of various district courts.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The
    Case 2:17-cv-01826-TSZ Document 153 Filed 06/11/20 Page 1 of 171 1 THE HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 10 KEVIN PINE, individually and on behalf Case No. 17-cv-1826 11 of all others similarly situated, DECLARATION OF DANIEL M. 12 Plaintiff, HUTCHINSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 13 v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS, AND SERVICE AWARDS TO THE 14 A PLACE FOR MOM, INC., a Delaware PLAINTIFFS corporation, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DECLARATION OF DANIEL M. HUTCHINSON LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Case No. 17-cv-1826 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor 1836300.2 San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Tel. 415.956.1000 • Fax 415.956.1008 Case 2:17-cv-01826-TSZ Document 153 Filed 06/11/20 Page 2 of 171 1 I, Daniel M. Hutchinson, declare as follows: 2 1. I am a partner in of the law firm of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP 3 (“LCHB”), co-counsel of record for Plaintiff in this matter. 4 2. I am admitted to practice pro hac vice before this Court and am a member in good 5 standing of the bar of the State of California; the United States District Court for the Central, 6 Northern, and Southern Districts of California; the United States District Court for the Eastern 7 District of Wisconsin; and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, and 8 Eleventh Circuits.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyer NEW DEAN TAKES CHARGE
    Stanford FALL 2004 FALL Lawyer NEW DEAN TAKES CHARGE Larry D. Kramer brings fresh ideas, lots of energy, and a willingness to stir things up a bit. Remember Stanford... F rom his family’s apricot orchard in Los Altos Hills, young Thomas Hawley could see Hoover Tower and hear the cheers in Stanford Stadium. “In those days my heroes were John Brodie and Chuck Taylor,” he says, “and my most prized possessions were Big Game programs.” Thomas transferred from Wesleyan University to Stanford as a junior in and two years later enrolled in the Law School, where he met John Kaplan. “I took every course Professor Kaplan taught,” says Thomas. “He was a brilliant, often outrageous teacher, who employed humor in an attempt to drive the law into our not always receptive minds.” In choosing law, Thomas followed in the footsteps of his father, Melvin Hawley (L.L.B. ’), and both grandfathers. “I would have preferred to be a professional quarterback or an opera singer,” he says (he fell in love with opera while at Stanford-in-Italy), “and I might well have done so but for a complete lack of talent.” An estate planning attorney on the Monterey Peninsula, Thomas has advised hundreds of families how to make tax-wise decisions concerning the distribution of their estates. When he decided the time had come to sell his rustic Carmel cottage, he took his own advice and put the property in a charitable remainder trust instead, avoiding the capital gains tax he otherwise would have paid upon sale. When the trust terminates, one-half of it will go to Stanford Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern District of California Northern District of California Lawyer
    NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LAWYER REPRESENTATIVE COMMITTEE REPORT 2017-2018 Submitted by Miriam Kim (Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP) and Elizabeth Pipkin (McManis Faulkner), 2018-2019 Committee Co-Chairs. I. Introduction: This report will cover judicial developments in the Northern District since August 2017, our District Conference, and other activities of the Lawyer Representative Committee during that time. II. Judicial Appointments and Retirements A. The Northern District continues to enjoy its full complement of active district- court judges. Together with the continued strong contributions of our five senior-status judges and 12 full- time magistrate judges, the District is well prepared to serve the interest of justice in our federal system. B. In August 2017, Chief Judge Emeritus Thelton Henderson took inactive status after serving 37 years on the bench, including his 7-year term as the court’s Chief Judge from 1990 to 1997. The court held a retirement celebration at the San Francisco courthouse, in the Ceremonial Courtroom, which was renamed in his honor as the Thelton E. Henderson Ceremonial Courtroom. C. In June 2017, Bankruptcy Judge Alan Jaroslovsky retired. He served over 30 years on the Bankruptcy Court, including his tenure as Chief Bankruptcy Judge from 2011 to 2014. D. In November 2017, Magistrate Judge Vadas retired after serving in the Eureka Division for 13 years. The court appointed Robert Illman to that magistrate-judge position. E. In June 2018, Magistrate Judge Howard Lloyd will retire after 16 years on the bench in the San Jose Division. The court has selected Virginia K. DeMarchi, formerly a partner at the law firm of Fenwick & West LLP, to join the Northern District bench as a Magistrate Judge upon Judge Lloyd’s retirement.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-02-01 Litigation Rules Update Summaries
    Litigation Rules Update Summaries Update Summary February 01, 2021: The following new Rules Set was created: SDNY Standing Order ‐‐ Judge John P. Cronan The following Rules Sets were renamed: No Rules Sets were renamed. The following Rules Sets were removed: No Rules Sets were removed. The following Rules Sets were reactivated: No Rules Sets were reactivated. The following Rules Sets were revised: Federal Rules of Bankruptcy USDC ‐‐ M.D. Alabama CA ‐‐ Amador County Superior Court CA ‐‐ Fresno County Superior Court CA ‐‐ Inyo County Superior Court CA ‐‐ Monterey County Superior Court CA ‐‐ Nevada County Superior Court CA ‐‐ San Benito County Superior Court CA ‐‐ San Joaquin County Superior Court CA ‐‐ Santa Clara County Superior Court CA ‐‐ Santa Cruz County Superior Court CA ‐‐ Shasta County Superior Court CA ‐‐ Solano County Superior Court CA ‐‐ Stanislaus County Superior Courts CA ‐‐ Ventura County Superior Court CA ‐‐ Yolo County Superior Court CA ‐‐ Fresno County Superior Court ‐ Family CA ‐‐ Santa Clara County Superior Court ‐ Family CA ‐‐ Ventura County Superior Court ‐ Family DC ‐‐ Rules of Civil Procedure USBC ‐‐ M.D. Florida USBC ‐‐ N.D. Illinois USBC ‐‐ District of Massachusetts USBC ‐‐ E.D. Michigan MI ‐‐ 46th Circuit Court (Otsego, Kalkaska, and Crawford) MO ‐‐ Thirty‐First Judicial Circuit (Greene) NE ‐‐ Uniform County Court Rules SDNY Standing Order ‐‐ Judge Ronnie Abrams SDNY Standing Order ‐‐ Judge Richard M. Berman SDNY Standing Order ‐‐ Judge P. Kevin Castel SDNY Standing Order ‐‐ Judge Kenneth M. Karas SDNY Standing Order ‐‐ Judge Edgardo Ramos USBC ‐‐ S.D. New York NY Appellate Division, Rules of Practice NY ‐‐ Appellate Division, First Department NY ‐‐ Appellate Division, Second Department NY ‐‐ Appellate Division, Third Department NY ‐‐ Appellate Division, Fourth Department USDC ‐‐ District of North Dakota USDC ‐‐ N.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 Nominations Submitted to The
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 Nominations Submitted to the Senate November 21, 2014 The following list does not include promotions of members of the Uniformed Services, nominations to the Service Academies, or nominations of Foreign Service Officers. Submitted January 6 Jill A. Pryor, of Georgia, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the 11th Circuit, vice Stanley F. Birch, Jr., retired. Carolyn B. McHugh, of Utah, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the 10th Circuit, vice Michael R. Murphy, retired. Michelle T. Friedland, of California, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, vice Raymond C. Fisher, retired. Nancy L. Moritz, of Kansas, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the 10th Circuit, vice Deanell Reece Tacha, retired. John B. Owens, of California, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, vice Stephen S. Trott, retired. David Jeremiah Barron, of Massachusetts, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the First Circuit, vice Michael Boudin, retired. Robin S. Rosenbaum, of Florida, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the 11th Circuit, vice Rosemary Barkett, resigned. Julie E. Carnes, of Georgia, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the 11th Circuit, vice James Larry Edmondson, retired. Gregg Jeffrey Costa, of Texas, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, vice Fortunato P. Benavides, retired. Rosemary Márquez, of Arizona, to be U.S. District Judge for the District of Arizona, vice Frank R. Zapata, retired. Pamela L. Reeves, of Tennessee, to be U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, vice Thomas W. Phillips, retiring.
    [Show full text]
  • (“ERISA”) Decisions As They Were Reported on Westlaw Between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016
    DRAFT * This document is a case summary compilation of select Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) decisions as they were reported on Westlaw between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016. Nothing in this document constitutes legal advice. Case summaries prepared by Michelle L. Roberts, Partner, Roberts Bartolic LLP, 1050 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 105, Alameda, CA 94501. © Roberts Bartolic LLP I. Attorneys’ Fees .................................................................................................................. 11 A. First Circuit ..................................................................................................................................... 11 B. Second Circuit ................................................................................................................................. 11 C. Third Circuit .................................................................................................................................... 14 D. Fourth Circuit .................................................................................................................................. 14 E. Fifth Circuit ..................................................................................................................................... 15 F. Sixth Circuit .................................................................................................................................... 16 G. Seventh Circuit ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement Case No
    Case 8:18-cv-01548-DOC-ADS Document 163 Filed 07/02/21 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:20213 1 Julian Burns King (Bar No. 298617) [email protected] 2 Elliot J. Siegel (Bar No. 286798) 3 [email protected] KING & SIEGEL LLP 4 724 S. Spring Street, Ste. 201 5 Los Angeles, California 90014 Telephone: (213) 465-4802 6 Facsimile: (213) 465-4803 7 8 Daniel Hutchinson (Bar No. 239458) [email protected] 9 Lin Y. Chan (Bar No. 255027) 10 [email protected] LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & 11 BERNSTEIN, LLP 12 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 13 Telephone: (415) 956-1000 Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 Marcie Le and Karen Dao, individu- Case No. 8:18-cv-01548-DOC (ADSx) ally and on behalf of all others similarly 19 Hon. David O. Carter situated, 20 Special Master Hon. Jay C. Gandhi (Ret.) Plaintiffs, 21 v. PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF 22 Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation; MOTION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR 23 Walgreen Pharmacy Services Mid- west, LLC, an Illinois limited liability FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 24 company; and Walgreens Boots Alli- ACTION SETTLEMENT 25 ance, a Delaware corporation, [Declarations of Elliot J. Siegel, Daniel Defendants. M. Hutchinson, and Bryan Valdez; 26 [Proposed] Order filed concurrently] 27 Hearing Date: August 2, 2021 Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m. 28 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01548 Case 8:18-cv-01548-DOC-ADS Document 163 Filed 07/02/21 Page 2 of 16 Page ID #:20214 1 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on August 2, 2021 at 8:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]