William Alsup

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

William Alsup William Alsup An Oral History Conducted by Leah McGarrigle 2016-2017 William Alsup An Oral History Conducted by Leah McGarrigle 2016-2017 Copyright © 2021 William Alsup, Leah McGarrigle All rights reserved. Copyright in the manuscript and recording is owned by William Alsup and Leah McGarrigle, who have made the materials available under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. It is recommended that this oral history be cited as follows: "William Alsup: An Oral History Conducted by Leah McGarrigle, 2016-2017”. Transcription by Christine Sinnott Book design by Anna McGarrigle Judge William Alsup was born in Mississippi in 1945 and lived there until he left for Harvard Law School in 1967. At Harvard, he earned a law degree plus a master’s degree in public policy from the Kennedy School of Government. In 1971–72, he clerked for Justice William O. Douglas of the United States Supreme Court and worked with him on the Abortion Cases and the “Trees Have Standing” case, among others. Alsup and his young family then returned to Mississippi, where he practiced civil rights law, went broke, and eventually relocated to San Francisco. There he be- came a trial lawyer, a practice interrupted by two years of appel- late practice as an Assistant to the Solicitor General in the United States Department of Justice (from 1978–80). In 1999, President Bill Clinton nominated him and the Senate conirmed him as a United States District Judge in San Francisco. He took the oath of oice on August 17, 1999, and serves still on active status. He has presided over a number of high-proile trials with more than two hundred of his opinions reprinted in oicial reporters despite not having asked for them to be published. Two prior works include Missing in the Minarets, the true story of the 1933 search for mountaineer Pete Starr, who went missing in the Minarets region of the High Sierra, published in 1999 by the Yosemite Association (now the Yosemite Conservancy) and Such A Landscape!, the true story of the 1864 expedition of the California Geological Survey in the High Sierra, published by the Yosemite Association in 1986. Judge Alsup is married with two children and two grandchildren, still loves ilm photography, and remains an avid mountaineer. Judge William Alsup in 2016. Photo by Jason Doiy. Previous page: Last light on a clearing storm in the Ritlea Range I've been blessed in life. Every job I've had taught me something worthwhile and I've relished them all. Every friend and colleague has given me more than I've returned (despite my eforts other- wise). Most of all, my wife Suzan and two children, Allison and John, rank at the top of my blessings. I don't know why Leah McGarrigle would have ofered to do this oral history and the research that went with it as a gift. It proved to be a monumental endeavor. Leah has become yet another blessing in a long life enriched by others. She even enlisted her daughter Anna to design this book. My faithful secretary Kathy Young or- chestrated the interviews. I thank all three. William Alsup Contents Interview History by Leah McGarrigle, Oral Historian Introduction by Danny Cupit Introduction by Joseph Garrett Interview One ...........................................................................................................................1 Early family history Texas to Mississippi Father and the Second World War Sisters Willanna and Sandy School and segregation Favorite subjects Interview Two .........................................................................................................................11 2325 Terry Road Meeting Junior Feild, 1950 Holding up Nell’s General Store Planting corn, the vegetable garden and fruit trees Sunday dinners and holiday meals The Space Program and the Chick Experiment, 1962 Paper route for The State Times and ice-cream truck operator The survey crew Interview Three ......................................................................................................................25 Childhood pals Brown v. Board of Education Counter protest against Escobedo v. Illinois The John Birch Society's “Impeach Earl Warren” Billboard, February 1963 Higgen Hogs Club; high school election and protest Backdrop of the Civil Rights Movement in Jackson, Mississippi Clarion Ledger, letter to the editor, June 6, 1963 – "We Are For the Civil Rights for Negroes" Cusp of social change from high school to college Martin Luther King speech in Chicago, 1966 James Meredith, March 1966 The Murder of Medgar Evers Judge Thelton Henderson and John Doar in Jackson, Mississippi Paying respects to Charles Evers with Danny Cupit Interview Four ........................................................................................................................37 Interest in science, ham radio and the mechanical arts Inluence of the Second World War on thinking about democracy and civil rights Civil War seemed barely over Family trips: Cuba and Guatemala Expectations regarding education Interview Five .........................................................................................................................47 Maternal side of the family James Meredith and Ole’ Miss, 1962 Evolving perspective on equality James Meredith’s one man protest, 1966 Tougaloo rally and Dick Gregory Provine High School, National Merit inalist Applying to college, starting Mississippi State in August 1963 Debate team and decision to apply to law school Mississippi State men’s basketball team and integrated tournaments The YMCA campus program; Kermit Clardy; becoming the VP Attending YMCA meeting and Martin Luther King speech in Chicago, August 1966 Interview Six ...........................................................................................................................61 The Speaker Ban, Aaron Henry, President of the Mississippi NAACP Senior year; the YMCA and the Young Democrat boards Acceptance to Harvard Law School Mandate For Change: organizing campaign for student body president Summer job working with analog computers Music; anti-war protests MacTavish’s Kitchens in Oban, Scotland and traveling in Europe Marriage to Suzan, August 31, 1968 Mentors Interview Seven ......................................................................................................................73 Starting Harvard Law School and academic environment, 1967-1968 Kennedy School of Government: Masters of Public Policy and Law Degree Friends, including Terry Barnett Spring 1971: applying for clerkship with Justice Douglas Move to Washington, D.C. and start of clerkship Summer 1969: job with Los Angeles law irm Summer 1970: working for Mississippi Research & Development Center Reviewing petitions for cert; Justice Douglas in Goose Prairie, Washington Start of Supreme Court term Interview Eight .......................................................................................................................85 Early life and career of Justice Douglas Role of law clerk to Justice Douglas; opinion writing process President Nixon and Watergate, 1972 The C&O hike and Save the Canal efort by Justice Douglas U.S. Supreme Court clerkship workload Interview Nine ........................................................................................................................97 (continued) Supreme Court, work schedule Howard Hughes and Hughes Air West case Sierra Club v. Morton: footnotes, concurring opinion, “trees have standing” premise Roe v. Wade: right to privacy and issue of re-argument Interview Ten ........................................................................................................................ 109 (continued) Roe v. Wade, Justice Douglas’s concurring opinion; research for draft Justice Douglas at oral argument Journalists’ Privilege and the First Amendment Returning to Mississippi to practice law Black sanitation workers union case, 1972 Leaving Mississippi and joining Morrison & Foerster in San Francisco, 1973 Interview Eleven ................................................................................................................... 117 Morrison & Foerster in the 1970s, litigation department and irm-wide events “Roadmap to Victory” Crocker Bank litigation Bob Raven, war hero, “As a concession to the shortness of life” Joining the Solicitor General’s oice, 1978 Transition from private practice; Solicitor General Wade McCree Sioux Nation v. United States, digging into the record including Native American history Kissinger FOIA case Interview Thirteen ............................................................................................................... 137 Back to Morrison, the DQ University pro bono cases Dennis Banks; the Department of Education Billing hours More about arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court Being a trial lawyer Industrial Union Department v. American Petroleum Institute, (OSHA), 1980 Interview Fourteen ............................................................................................................... 145 Types of cases at Morrison & Foerster OPM Leasing RICO case Peter Morton, Andrew Lloyd Weber, John Eastman Preparing for trial More pro bono cases: class action against slum landlord Save Bodie campaign and becoming honorary California State Park ranger in 1993 Yosemite, Such a Landscape (1964 California Geological Survey through the Sierra) Yosemite Association Board, Yosemite Restoration Trust, General Management Plan of 1980 Wilderness photography Interview Fifteen .................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration in Support of Preliminary Approval
    Case 2:14-cv-01720-JCC Document 51 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 6 1 The Honorable John C. Coughenour 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 LINDA GRIFFITH and JEANETTE WENZL, 10 on behalf of themselves, individually, and on behalf of the Providence Health & Services No. 2:14-cv-01720-JCC 11 Cash Balance Retirement Plan, 12 Plaintiffs, DECLARATION OF LYNN LINCOLN v. SARKO IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ 13 UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES; PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 RETIREMENT PLANS COMMITTEE; SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 15 ELLEN WOLF; JOHN and JANE DOES 1-20, inclusive, MEMBERS OF THE RETIREMENT 16 PLANS COMMITTEE; JOHN or JANE DOE 21, PLAN DIRECTOR; HUMAN 17 RESOURCES COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS; JOHN and JANE DOES 22- 18 40, inclusive, MEMBERS OF THE HUMAN 19 RESOURCES COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS; ROD HOCHMAN; BOARD 20 OF DIRECTORS OF PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES; MICHAEL HOLCOMB; 21 CHAUNCEY BOYLE; ISIAAH CRAWFORD; MARTHA DIAZ ASZKENAZY; PHYLLIS 22 HUGHES; SALLYE LINER; KIRBY 23 McDONALD; DAVE OLSEN; AL PARRISH; CAROLINA REYES; PETER J. SNOW; 24 MICHAEL A. STEIN; CHARLES WATTS; BOB WILSON; JOHN and JANE DOES 41-50, 25 inclusive, 26 Defendants. 27 DECLARATION OF LYNN LINCOLN LAW OFFICES OF LAW OFFICES OF K E L L E R R O H R B A C K L . L . P . C O H E N M I L S T E I N S E L L E R S & T OLL, PLLC. SARKO IN SUPPORT OF PRELIMINARY 1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 3200 1100 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W .
    [Show full text]
  • Other Was Being Abused to Death; My Father Locked in Nursing Home in Texas (2013-2019 Death)
    AMENDED (3) No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES LINDA ANN WRIGHT -PETITIONER vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. -RESPONDENT(S) ON PETITION FOR AN EXTRAORDINARY WRIT FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT OF MANDAMUS LINDA ANN WRIGHT 300 Elizabeth Drive, Apartment 3108 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 15220 (4121 715-7733 IV. QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Was there a concerted effort, from 2007-Present to deny petitioner her Due Process, under the 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the U.S.? 2. If the Petitioner is not an Attorney, and several Judges consider her lacking, should they have Authorized Counsel since she produced the facts? 3. Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the denial of Disqualification of Judges deny the Petitioner, Due Process and Redress in not having an investigation? 4. Was the Chief Judge serving as counsel for the Named Judges? Should she have recused herself, was she involved in the naming of the Federal Building, named after one of the Judges? 5. Was Judge Owens while serving in the Texas Supreme Court, aware of Case No. 15-00214, in USDC Texas Northern District, did it affect her Decision? 6. Did the Fifth Circuit Appellate Review Board in not calling for an investigation into the facts submitted by Appellant/ Petitioner Obstructed Justice and Rule Article V, 28 U..C § 358., therefor denying Due Process, Redress? 7. Was there a concerted effort by California, Texas, and the U.S. Courts, to deny Petitioner’s Constitutional, Civil, Financial Rights as an American Citizen? 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Legal History
    WESTERN LEGAL HISTORY THE JOURNAL OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 9, NUMBER I WINTER/SPRING 1996 Western Legal History is published semi-annually, in spring and fall, by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society, 125 S. Grand Avenue, Pasadena, California 91105, (818) 795-0266. The journal explores, analyzes, and presents the history of law, the legal profession, and the courts-particularly the federal courts-in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Western Legal History is sent to members of the Society as well as members of affiliated legal historical societies in the Ninth Circuit. Membership is open to all. Membership dues (individuals and institutions): Patron, $1,000 or more; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499; Sustaining, $100- $249; Advocate, $50-$99; Subscribing (non-members of the bench and bar, lawyers in practice fewer than five years, libraries, and academic institutions), $25-$49; Membership dues (law firms and corporations): Founder, $3,000 or more; Patron, $1,000-$2,999; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499. For information regarding membership, back issues of Western Legal History, and other society publications and programs, please write or telephone the editor. POSTMASTER: Please send change of address to: Editor Western Legal History 125 S. Grand Avenue Pasadena, California 91105 Western Legal History disclaims responsibility for statements made by authors and for accuracy of footnotes. Copyright, (01996, Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society ISSN 0896-2189 The Editorial Board welcomes unsolicited manuscripts, books for review, and reconumendations for the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • National Association of Women Judges Counterbalance Spring 2012 Volume 31 Issue 3
    national association of women judges counterbalance Spring 2012 Volume 31 Issue 3 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Poverty’s Impact on the Administration of Justice / 1 President’s Message / 2 Executive Director’s Message / 3 Cambridge 2012 Midyear Meeting and Leadership Conference / 6 MEET ME IN MIAMI: NAWJ 2012 Annual Conference / 8 District News / 10 Immigration Programs News / 20 Membership Moments / 20 Women in Prison Report / 21 Louisiana Women in Prison / 21 Maryland Women in Prison / 23 NAWJ District 14 Director Judge Diana Becton and Contra Costa County native Christopher Darden with local high school youth New York Women in Prison / 24 participants in their November, 2011 Color of Justice program. Read more on their program in District 14 News. Learn about Color of Justice in creator Judge Brenda Loftin’s account on page 33. Educating the Courts and Others About Sexual Violence in Unexpected Areas / 28 NAWJ Judicial Selection Committee Supports Gender Equity in Selection of Judges / 29 POVERTY’S IMPACT ON THE ADMINISTRATION Newark Conference Perspective / 30 OF JUSTICE 1 Ten Years of the Color of Justice / 33 By the Honorable Anna Blackburne-Rigsby and Ashley Thomas Jeffrey Groton Remembered / 34 “The opposite of poverty is justice.”2 These words have stayed with me since I first heard them Program Spotlight: MentorJet / 35 during journalist Bill Moyers’ interview with civil rights attorney Bryan Stevenson. In observance News from the ABA: Addressing Language of the anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s assassination, they were discussing what Dr. Access / 38 King would think of the United States today in the fight against inequality and injustice.
    [Show full text]
  • The History, Content, Application and Influence of the Northern District of California’S Patent Local Rules
    THE HISTORY, CONTENT, APPLICATION AND INFLUENCE OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA’S PATENT LOCAL RULES James Ware† & Brian Davy†† Abstract On December 1, 2000, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California became the first district court to promulgate rules governing the content and timing of disclosures in patent-related cases. The Northern District’s conception of Patent Local Rules finds its origins in the concerns during the 1980’s and 1990’s, when the increasing cost and expense of civil litigation came under increasing attack from commentators and all three branches of the federal government. Despite efforts to improve the efficiency of civil litigation generally, patent litigation proved particularly burdensome on litigants and the courts. The Supreme Court’s decision in Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. only exacerbated this situation. The Northern District’s Patent Local Rules are specifically tailored to address the unique challenges that arise during patent litigation, particularly during the pretrial discovery process. The Rules require the patentee and the accused infringer to set forth detailed infringement and invalidity theories early in the case. The Rules also govern the content and timing of disclosures related to the claim construction hearing, an event unique to patent litigation that is often case-dispositive. The Northern District’s Patent Local Rules have been expressly endorsed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The Rules have also proven highly influential in other judicial districts, as evidenced by the adoption of substantially similar rules in a growing number of district courts. Substantive differences do exist, however, between the patent local rules of various district courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyer NEW DEAN TAKES CHARGE
    Stanford FALL 2004 FALL Lawyer NEW DEAN TAKES CHARGE Larry D. Kramer brings fresh ideas, lots of energy, and a willingness to stir things up a bit. Remember Stanford... F rom his family’s apricot orchard in Los Altos Hills, young Thomas Hawley could see Hoover Tower and hear the cheers in Stanford Stadium. “In those days my heroes were John Brodie and Chuck Taylor,” he says, “and my most prized possessions were Big Game programs.” Thomas transferred from Wesleyan University to Stanford as a junior in and two years later enrolled in the Law School, where he met John Kaplan. “I took every course Professor Kaplan taught,” says Thomas. “He was a brilliant, often outrageous teacher, who employed humor in an attempt to drive the law into our not always receptive minds.” In choosing law, Thomas followed in the footsteps of his father, Melvin Hawley (L.L.B. ’), and both grandfathers. “I would have preferred to be a professional quarterback or an opera singer,” he says (he fell in love with opera while at Stanford-in-Italy), “and I might well have done so but for a complete lack of talent.” An estate planning attorney on the Monterey Peninsula, Thomas has advised hundreds of families how to make tax-wise decisions concerning the distribution of their estates. When he decided the time had come to sell his rustic Carmel cottage, he took his own advice and put the property in a charitable remainder trust instead, avoiding the capital gains tax he otherwise would have paid upon sale. When the trust terminates, one-half of it will go to Stanford Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Kissinger Associates' Conflict of Interest in Central America
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 10, Number 32, August 23, 1983 Kissinger Asso ciates' conflict of interest in Central America by Joseph Brewda He stands to make a killing in Central America. His resume partners who, along with Kissinger, include: of current financial dealings with that region show him to be • Lord Peter Carrington�hainnan, The General in violation of the "conflict-of-interest" ethics treasured by Electric Company, Ltd.; former foreign secretary, Great U.S. Senators and Watergaters. Henry Kissinger's policies Britain; former chairman, Australia and New Zealand Bank; of genocide aside, the wealth he will gain for himself by former director. Barclays Bank, Rio Tinto Zinc, Hambros imposing those policies as appointed chairman of the Presi­ Bank, and British Metal Corporation. dent's Bipartisan Commissionon Central America make him • Pehr Gustaf Gyllenhammer�hairman, Volvo; ineligible for that position-by all standards of American chairman, Swedish Ships Morgage Bank; director, Skandia political propriety. Insurance; member, Chase Manhattan International Advi­ At present, Kissinger, who was required to formally dis­ sory Committee. affiliate himself from his corporate holdings while Secretary • Robert O. Anderson�hairman, Atlantic Richfield; of State, retains the following paid positions with agencies chairman, Aspen Institute. with vested interests in Central America: • Thomas Jefferson Cunningham III-secretary, Kis­ • Kissinger Associates-·partner; singer Associates; former president, Orion Bank's London • Chase Manhattan Bank�ounselor and former chair­ branch. (The now disbanded Orion was a consortium of Chase man, InternationalAdvisory Committee; Manhattan, Royal Bank of Canada, National Westminster, • Goldman, Sachs & Company-adviser; Mitsubishi Bank, Credito Italiano Holdings, and West­ • National Broadcasting Company-special consultant, deutsche Landesbank Girozentrale.) world affairs and; • Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Republican Appointees and Judicial Discretion: Cases Studies from the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Era
    Republican Appointees and Judicial Discretion: Cases Studies From the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Era Professor David M. Zlotnicka Senior Justice Fellow – Open Society Institute Nothing sits more uncomfortably with judges than the sense that they have all the responsibility for sentencing but little of the power to administer it justly.1 Outline of the Report This Report explores Republican-appointed district court judge dissatisfaction with the sentencing regime in place during the Sentencing Guideline era.2 The body of the Report discusses my findings. Appendix A presents forty case studies which are the product of my research.3 Each case study profiles a Republican appointee and one or two sentencings by that judge that illustrates the concerns of this cohort of judges. The body of the Report is broken down as follows: Part I addresses four foundational issues that explain the purposes and relevance of the project. Parts II and III summarizes the broad arc of judicial reaction to aThe author is currently the Distinguished Service Professor of Law, Roger Williams University School of Law, J.D., Harvard Law School. During 2002-2004, I was a Soros Senior Justice Fellow and spent a year as a Visiting Scholar at the George Washington University Law Center and then as a Visiting Professor at the Washington College of Law. I wish to thank OSI and these law schools for the support and freedom to research and write. Much appreciation is also due to Dan Freed, Ian Weinstein, Paul Hofer, Colleen Murphy, Jared Goldstein, Emily Sack, and Michael Yelnosky for their helpful c omments on earlier drafts of this Report and the profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • HUBERT H. HUMPHREY PAPERS an Inventory of His 1968 Presidential Campaign Files
    MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Manuscript Collections HUBERT H. HUMPHREY PAPERS An Inventory of His 1968 Presidential Campaign Files OVERVIEW Creator: Humphrey, Hubert H. (Hubert Horatio), 1911-1978. Title: 1968 Presidential campaign files. Dates: 1949-1969 (bulk 1968). Abstract: Files created by and/or relating to the organization and administration of Humphrey's 1968 campaign for the Presidency of the United States. They are an amalgam of files produced by many individuals and organizations, on the local, state, and national levels. Quantity: 122.0 cu. ft. Location: See Detailed Description section for box locations. HISTORICAL SKETCH Nineteen sixty-eight was not a normal election year. Ordinarily, an incumbent president would have an easy path to his party's nomination for a second term, and much better than even odds at re-election Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey had won the 1964 election in a landslide. By 1968, however, opposition to the war in Vietnam was growing, racial tensions building, the economy stalling, and a desire for real change brewing. While many discontented voters listened to independent candidate George Wallace, and Republican Richard Nixon returned from political exile, most young people looked to the Democratic Party as offering the best chance for significant change in 1968. That meant that Johnson would receive more than token challenges to his re-nomination. Minnesota senator Eugene McCarthy became the first candidate to question the morality and legality of the Vietnam War as well as its military and political objectives. College students flocked to his campaign and canvassed door to door in his behalf in the first Democratic presidential primary on March 12 in New Hampshire.
    [Show full text]
  • (“ERISA”) Decisions As They Were Reported on Westlaw Between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016
    DRAFT * This document is a case summary compilation of select Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) decisions as they were reported on Westlaw between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016. Nothing in this document constitutes legal advice. Case summaries prepared by Michelle L. Roberts, Partner, Roberts Bartolic LLP, 1050 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 105, Alameda, CA 94501. © Roberts Bartolic LLP I. Attorneys’ Fees .................................................................................................................. 11 A. First Circuit ..................................................................................................................................... 11 B. Second Circuit ................................................................................................................................. 11 C. Third Circuit .................................................................................................................................... 14 D. Fourth Circuit .................................................................................................................................. 14 E. Fifth Circuit ..................................................................................................................................... 15 F. Sixth Circuit .................................................................................................................................... 16 G. Seventh Circuit ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • County of Orange Positions on Proposed Legislation
    DRAFT A Publication of the County Executive Office/Legislative Affairs October 20, 2020 Item No. 12 County of Orange Positions on Proposed Legislation The Legislative Bulletin provides the Board of Supervisors with analyses of measures pending in Sacramento and Washington that are of interest to the County. Staff provides recommended positions that fall within the range of policies established by the Board. According to the County of Orange Legislative Affairs Procedures adopted by the Board of Supervisors on December 10, 2019, staff recommendations for formal County positions on legislation will be agendized and presented in this document for Board action at regular Board of Supervisors meetings. When the Board takes formal action on a piece of legislation, the CEO will direct the County’s legislative advocates to promote the individual bills as approved by the Board. The Legislative Bulletin also provides the Board of Supervisors with informative updates on State and Federal issues. The 2019-2020 Legislative Platform was adopted by the Board of Supervisors’ on December 4, 2018. On October 20, 2020, the Board of Supervisors will consider the following actions: RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 1. Receive and File Legislative Bulletin INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. County Position Matrix: CEO-LA 2. Sacramento Legislative Report 3. Washington DC Legislative Report JMP101420 INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. County Position Matrix: CEO-LA The matrix below summarizes active bills the County has taken positions on in 2019-20. State Legislation As of Thursday, October 15,
    [Show full text]