County of Orange Positions on Proposed Legislation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

County of Orange Positions on Proposed Legislation DRAFT A Publication of the County Executive Office/Legislative Affairs October 20, 2020 Item No. 12 County of Orange Positions on Proposed Legislation The Legislative Bulletin provides the Board of Supervisors with analyses of measures pending in Sacramento and Washington that are of interest to the County. Staff provides recommended positions that fall within the range of policies established by the Board. According to the County of Orange Legislative Affairs Procedures adopted by the Board of Supervisors on December 10, 2019, staff recommendations for formal County positions on legislation will be agendized and presented in this document for Board action at regular Board of Supervisors meetings. When the Board takes formal action on a piece of legislation, the CEO will direct the County’s legislative advocates to promote the individual bills as approved by the Board. The Legislative Bulletin also provides the Board of Supervisors with informative updates on State and Federal issues. The 2019-2020 Legislative Platform was adopted by the Board of Supervisors’ on December 4, 2018. On October 20, 2020, the Board of Supervisors will consider the following actions: RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 1. Receive and File Legislative Bulletin INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. County Position Matrix: CEO-LA 2. Sacramento Legislative Report 3. Washington DC Legislative Report JMP101420 INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. County Position Matrix: CEO-LA The matrix below summarizes active bills the County has taken positions on in 2019-20. State Legislation As of Thursday, October 15, 2020 Bill Author Subject Position Date of Status Notes Number Board Action AB 434 Daly Housing Financing Support 7.28.20 Chaptered #192 Programs: Uniform Procedures AB 2265 Quirk- Mental Health Support 5.19.20 Chaptered #144 Silva Services Act: Use of funds for substance use disorder treatment SB 555 Mitchell Jails and Juvenile Oppose 6.25.19 Vetoed Facilities: Telephone Services: Store SB 803 Beall Mental Health Support 3.10.20 Chaptered #150 Services: peer support specialist certification SB 1196 Umberg Price gouging Support 5.19.20 Chaptered #339 Federal Legislation As of Thursday October 15, 2020 Bill Author Subject Position Date of Status Notes Number Board Action HR 2995 Levin Spent Fuel Support 6.25.19 House Energy and Prioritization Act Commerce Committee HR 4004 Bustos The “Social Support 1.14.20 House Energy and Determinants Commerce Committee Accelerator Act of 2019” HR 5516 Levin Commitment to Support 9.15.20 House Veterans Affairs Veteran Support and Committee Outreach S.923 Feinstein Fighting Support 5.7.19 Senate Health, Homelessness Education, Labor and Through Services and Pensions Committee Housing Act S. 3020 Baldwin Commitment to Support 3.10.20 Senate Veterans Affairs Veteran Support and Committee Outreach S. 4431 Feinstein Emergency Wildfire Support 9.29.20 Senate Energy and and Public Safety Act Natural Resources of 2020 Committee Page 2 of 7 2. Sacramento Legislative Report Prepared by Precision Advocacy Group LLC The Administration and Legislature have primarily been occupied with pandemic and election activities over the last week. A few interim hearings focused on COVID-19 response were held and those informational and oversight hearings will continue through the fall. We anticipate that the Capitol will remain relatively quiet over the next couple of weeks. Project Homekey On September 28th, the Department of Finance (DOF) sent a letter to the chairs of both the budget and appropriations committees stating the desire to allocate an additional $200 million in Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) funding for Project Homekey (Homekey). As part of the 2020-21 Budget Act, $550 million was appropriated to Homekey to allow local governments to acquire hotels, motels, and other properties to support housing for individuals and families experiencing homelessness or who are at risk of homelessness due to COVID-19. Control Section 11.90 of the 2020-21 Budget Act allocated a total of $9.5 billion in federal funds from the CRF, all of which are required to be expended by December 30, 2020. Of that funding, $2.7 billion was set aside to offset state emergency response costs and programs that support vulnerable populations. Section 11.90 grants the Administration unusual latitude as it relates to state appropriations. After September 1, 2020, provided CRF funding has not been spent, it requires the Director of the Department of Finance to notify the Joint Legislative Budget Committee (JLBC) in writing, of its intent to reallocate funding. The notification must include the purpose and justification for the spending, and be delivered to the JLBC ten days prior to expending CRF funds. It does not require the JLBC to approve the appropriations. Despite that, Governor Newsom announced his request for permission to allocate additional funding in conjunction with revealing a third round of Homekey grants on September 28th. Senator Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles) who chairs the JLBC, responded with frustration to the DOF’s letter. She pointed out that the Legislature is well aware of the need to act quickly and decisively in this time of urgency, however they should be included in the determination of allocations of emergency funding. She listed a number of priorities that could be addressed with a $200 million appropriation, including food insecurity, child care, additional funding for the State Supplementary Payment program, assistance to low- income and unemployed tenants, and funding for the State’s Diaper Bank Program. Ultimately, she concurred to the spending, contingent upon an equal amount of CRF funding being allocated to the priorities above. It is frankly unclear at this point what this means. Our understanding is that the governor can now choose to accede to that request or ignore it. Relations between the Administration and Legislature have been tense during the COVID crisis however, and the governor’s request for permission to allocate funding could be an olive branch that he will continue. Per usual, the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) also weighed in, and recommended that the JLBC reject the request as it doesn’t include legislative input, and doesn’t necessarily align with the Legislature’s vision as it pertains to homelessness. In addition to the recommendation to reject the proposal pending further discussion by the Legislature, the LAO had a few concerns and recommendations including the following: • The proposal is premature. There will likely be increased expenditures for safety net programs through December 30th. If CRF funding has all been expended, the State General Fund (GF) will be forced to make up the difference. According to the LAO, the State has identified $900 million in permissible expenditures so far. Page 3 of 7 • It violates the intent of the Section 11.90 process. The Administration’s reallocation of funds before knowing whether the original allocations can be spent, goes beyond the Legislature’s intent in agreeing to the Section 11.90 process, which was to ensure that CRF money would not revert to the U.S. Treasury. • The proposal sets a concerning precedent. If additional funding is needed for costs that would have been covered by the CRF, State GF will have to backfill the shortfall. This increases state costs, which in essence, means that the Administration is unilaterally appropriating state GF. • The Legislature should establish a process to allocate unused CRF funds in the near future to ensure that funds are fully expended. The Department of Housing and Community Development has now awarded 4 rounds of funding for Project Homekey, including $23 million to Orange County for two projects in partnership with the City of Stanton. Ballot Boxes On October 12th, the Secretary of State’s (SOS) Chief Counsel sent a cease and desist letter to the Chair of the California Republican Party as well as the Chairs of the Fresno, Los Angeles, and Orange County Republican Party, asking that they, “cease and desist the coordination, use and/or false or misleading promotion of unauthorized and non-official vote by mail drop boxes.” The letter stemmed from reports to the Secretary of State’s office regarding unauthorized vote by mail drop boxes. In addition to the cease and desist request, the SOS asked that information be provided to the SOS regarding ballots already submitted to the unofficial drop boxes by October 15, 2020. The letter demanded the immediate return and surrender of vote-by-mail ballots received through the boxes to appropriate county elections officials. In addition to the cease and desist letter, SOS Alex Padilla issued guidance to county elections officials regarding unauthorized, non-official vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes AB 1921 (Gonzalez) Elections: vote by mail ballots, Chapter 820, Statutes of 2016, allows a vote by mail (VBM) voter who is unable to return his or her ballot to designate any person to return the ballot to the proper drop-off location or post office. In addition, it prohibits a designated person from receiving any form of compensation based on the number ballots that person returns. When the law was signed, ballot collecting, commonly called harvesting, required voters to authorize collectors, and the collectors had to sign the envelopes and state their relationship to the voter in order to ensure the ballot was counted. Since 2016, new legislation, AB 306 (Gonzalez) Vote by mail ballots, Chapter 203, Statutes of 2018, specified that a VBM ballot shall not be disqualified solely because the person authorized to return that ballot did not provide his or her name, relationship to the voter, or signature on the VBM ballot identification envelope. The current unresolved argument centers around whether GOP unofficial drop boxes can be considered ballot harvesting. The SOS is arguing that because there is no identified person that is authorized by the voter to take their ballot to be counted, the drop boxes are illegal.
Recommended publications
  • William Alsup
    William Alsup An Oral History Conducted by Leah McGarrigle 2016-2017 William Alsup An Oral History Conducted by Leah McGarrigle 2016-2017 Copyright © 2021 William Alsup, Leah McGarrigle All rights reserved. Copyright in the manuscript and recording is owned by William Alsup and Leah McGarrigle, who have made the materials available under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. It is recommended that this oral history be cited as follows: "William Alsup: An Oral History Conducted by Leah McGarrigle, 2016-2017”. Transcription by Christine Sinnott Book design by Anna McGarrigle Judge William Alsup was born in Mississippi in 1945 and lived there until he left for Harvard Law School in 1967. At Harvard, he earned a law degree plus a master’s degree in public policy from the Kennedy School of Government. In 1971–72, he clerked for Justice William O. Douglas of the United States Supreme Court and worked with him on the Abortion Cases and the “Trees Have Standing” case, among others. Alsup and his young family then returned to Mississippi, where he practiced civil rights law, went broke, and eventually relocated to San Francisco. There he be- came a trial lawyer, a practice interrupted by two years of appel- late practice as an Assistant to the Solicitor General in the United States Department of Justice (from 1978–80). In 1999, President Bill Clinton nominated him and the Senate conirmed him as a United States District Judge in San Francisco. He took the oath of oice on August 17, 1999, and serves still on active status.
    [Show full text]
  • National Association of Women Judges Counterbalance Spring 2012 Volume 31 Issue 3
    national association of women judges counterbalance Spring 2012 Volume 31 Issue 3 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Poverty’s Impact on the Administration of Justice / 1 President’s Message / 2 Executive Director’s Message / 3 Cambridge 2012 Midyear Meeting and Leadership Conference / 6 MEET ME IN MIAMI: NAWJ 2012 Annual Conference / 8 District News / 10 Immigration Programs News / 20 Membership Moments / 20 Women in Prison Report / 21 Louisiana Women in Prison / 21 Maryland Women in Prison / 23 NAWJ District 14 Director Judge Diana Becton and Contra Costa County native Christopher Darden with local high school youth New York Women in Prison / 24 participants in their November, 2011 Color of Justice program. Read more on their program in District 14 News. Learn about Color of Justice in creator Judge Brenda Loftin’s account on page 33. Educating the Courts and Others About Sexual Violence in Unexpected Areas / 28 NAWJ Judicial Selection Committee Supports Gender Equity in Selection of Judges / 29 POVERTY’S IMPACT ON THE ADMINISTRATION Newark Conference Perspective / 30 OF JUSTICE 1 Ten Years of the Color of Justice / 33 By the Honorable Anna Blackburne-Rigsby and Ashley Thomas Jeffrey Groton Remembered / 34 “The opposite of poverty is justice.”2 These words have stayed with me since I first heard them Program Spotlight: MentorJet / 35 during journalist Bill Moyers’ interview with civil rights attorney Bryan Stevenson. In observance News from the ABA: Addressing Language of the anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s assassination, they were discussing what Dr. Access / 38 King would think of the United States today in the fight against inequality and injustice.
    [Show full text]
  • The MINUTE BOOK
    The California Court Association, Inc. The MINUTE BOOK Volume 65, Issue 4 EDITORIAL STAFF CHAIR & EDITOR Victoria Borjesson Ventura County From 805.289.8519 805.477.5890 Fax “New Normal” Committee Members Teresa Rodriguez, Ventura to John Wilson, Ventura Juan Jaquez, Ventura “New Future” Ashley Grande, Ventura Melissa DiCiolli, Ventura Calle Borjesson, Social Media Photographer, Vacant CCA Website President’s Message 2 has a Widget! Click here! CCA Executive Board/Reg. Directors/ARC 3 CCA Committee Chairs 4 Editors’ Notes & Trivia $25 prize! 5 CCA SnapShot - CCA’s Virtual Training 6-7 The Perfect Storm Virtual Training 8 Virtual Training—Stay Tuned 9 CCA’s 67th Annual Convention 11 New Virtual Believe It or Not/Word Search/For the Record 12 Training! California Court Services re COVID19 13-16 The Perfect Storm Cal-Court Up to the Minute 17-20 Click here Office of the Governor—News 21 DMV Updates 22 Communications Committee 23 Annual Convention 8/2021- See you There! 24 Do YOU know the way to the NEW CCA? 1 Michelle Baldwin The President’s Message Riverside County One year ago, the wheels of justice skidded to a halt: nonessential cases were stayed, proceedings were delayed, and the deadlines for filing some lawsuits were suspended. But judges and their staff, like their healthcare colleagues, performed triage operations to keep the wheels spinning in cases that posed immediate safety issues. COVID-19 emergency orders initially shuttered several courthouse doors, forcing the legal system to change operations rapidly.ury J trials were suspended by most courts and many started to hold such judicial proceedings remotely.
    [Show full text]
  • Black History Month
    This Black History Month the National Center for State Courts recognizes some of the brave individuals who fought to break barriers and open the judicial system up to the Black community. These early accomplishments proved important to maintaining the legitimacy of the judicial branch and continuing buy-in of the court’s authority from the communities the courts serve. Representation on the bench remains an issue for some jurisdictions. With societal events of 2020 creating a renewed commitment to racial diversity, including the court system, the National Center explores tried and tested methods for establishing a more inclusive bench. An Indiana native, Macon Bolling Allen moved to Maine in 1835 to study law, becoming the first black lawyer in the United States when he was admitted to the 1 Maine Bar in 1844. Allen moved to Boston to practice but found the locals 2 unwilling to welcome an unknown. Allen served as a justice of the peace for two 3 appointments before moving to South Carolina. Image Source: Blackhistory.com A delegate to the 1868 South Carolina Constitutional Convention, Jonathan Jasper Wright was instrumental in shaping the judiciary provisions of the state’s constitution.4 A popular South Carolina lawyer and senator, in 1869 the state senate nominated Wright to the South Carolina Supreme Court, filling an unexpired term and making Justice Wright the first Black lawyer to sit on a state court of last resort.5 Justice Wright was one of three justices on the South Carolina Supreme Court until his opinion in Ex parte Norris was used to force him from the bench as the Reconstruction Era ended.6 Justice Wright’s reputation was finally restored over a hundred years after his unfair ouster from the court.7 Image Source Wright: Wikipedia Image Source S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Jenkins at Cal- Ifornia Judges Association Fireside Chat, 2019
    Judge Thelton E. Henderson (left) and Martin Jenkins at Cal- ifornia Judges Association fireside chat, 2019. Photo: Trina Thompson. of purpose that immediately told me he was not merely window shopping. He had a vision of his future and was laying the foundation. I felt an immediate kinship with him. The story he told was not unlike my own, including being an ex-athlete (he much more so than I) who was fortunate enough to be able to look beyond that rather limited career option. Marty was on track to graduate at the top of his law school class. He had ambitions and a winning personality. Like me, Marty comes from a family of modest means. He easily could secure a position with a handsome sal- ary upon graduation. He had everything a big firm would “Mentoring” Martin Jenkins: want, including the panache of having played professional football with the Seattle Seahawks for a year. My 40-Year Friendship with California’s New But Marty eschewed that life. Associate Supreme Court Justice He made it very clear to me that he wanted to use his law degree to serve others; and he used the word “serve” BY THELTON E. HENDERSON in the same way that my grandfather, a Southern minis- ter, used the term. As I got to know Marty, I found him to be a spiritual first met Martin Joseph Jenkins when he was a person with strong religious underpinnings. He received 3L at the University of San Francisco School of Law. Jesuit training in college and law school and still is a reg- IAt the time, I was on the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Incumbent List by District District Range: All
    Incumbent List by District District Range: All Term of Begin & End Incumbent Regular & Alt frmlaResA frmlaMailAszIncumbentJobTitle Phone Numbers Office TermiTermEndYear Dates *0 County Of Madera 1000 President and Vice President 1000 - 1 BidenHarris Incumbent - Elect......... No 4 01/20/2021 - 01/20/2025 PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT (202)456-1111 Residence County....... No Appointed/Elected........ Elected Party............................. Incumbent Vacated...... No 2000 Governor 2000 - 1 Gavin Newsom Incumbent - Elect......... No 4 01/07/2019 - 01/02/2023 (916)445-2841x____ Residence County....... No ()- Appointed/Elected........ Elected Fax: (916)558-3160 Party............................. Incumbent Vacated...... No 2100 Lieutenant Governor 2100 - 1 Eleni Kounalakis Incumbent - Elect......... No 4 01/07/2019 - 01/02/2023 (916)445-8994 Residence County....... No Appointed/Elected........ Elected Party............................. Incumbent Vacated...... No 2200 Secretary Of State 2200 - 1 Shirley N Weber Incumbent - Elect......... No 4 02/01/2021 - 01/02/2023 Secretary of State (916)657-2166x____ Residence County....... No Appointed/Elected........ Appointed To Vacancy Fax: (916)653-3214 Party............................. Incumbent Vacated...... Yes 2210 Controller 2210 - 1 Betty T Yee Incumbent - Elect......... No 4 01/07/2019 - 01/02/2023 (916)445-2636x____ Residence County....... No ()- Appointed/Elected........ Elected Fax: (916)322-4404 Party............................. Incumbent Vacated...... No 2230 Treasurer 2230 - 1 Fiona Ma Incumbent - Elect......... No 4 01/07/2019 - 01/02/2023 (916)653-2995 Residence County....... No Appointed/Elected........ Elected Party............................. Incumbent Vacated...... No 2240 Attorney General 2240 - 1 Rob Bonta Incumbent - Elect......... No 4 03/31/2021 - 01/02/2023 (800)952-5225 Residence County....... No (916) 210-6276 Appointed/Elected........ Appointed To Vacancy Fax: (916)323-5341 Party............................
    [Show full text]
  • State Council Report October 2020 For
    CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION Report of Board of Directors, Committees, and Items of New Business to be presented to STATE COUNCIL OF EDUCATION October 19-24, 2020 Burlingame, CA (Virtual) Printed by the Office Services Department of California Teachers Association OUR MISSION The California Teachers Association exists to protect and promote the well-being of its members; to improve the conditions of teaching and learning; to advance the cause of free, universal, and quality public education for all students; to ensure that the human dignity and civil rights of all children and youth are protected; and to secure a more just, equitable, and democratic society. To fulfill its mission, the California Teachers Association pursues the following goals: I. CTA plans and executes programs and strategies designed to enhance the quality of education for students and the professional and personal lives of its members. II. CTA assists its local chapters in bargaining for salaries and individual and employment rights in keeping with the academic and professional status of its members. III. CTA represents members in governmental relations -- to influence state and federal legislation and actions by state and federal agencies. IV. CTA strengthens its role as the preeminent voice for public education in California -- projects a strong, coherent and consistent image -- such that its members play the major role in shaping public policy on education. V. CTA represents members in professional and career development matters. VI. CTA represents members and provides a program of economic benefits and resources for members. VII. CTA works to maintain and expand its membership so as to remain effective in defending and advancing its members' interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Organizational Chart
    6.1.20 CALIFORNIA STATE GOVERNMENT – THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF STATE SUPERINTENDENT INSURANCE SECRETARY OF STATE EQUALIZATION LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE CONTROLLER STATE TREASURER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION COMMISSIONER GOVERNOR TED GAINES District 1 ELENI KOUNALAKIS GAVIN NEWSOM XAVIER BECERRA BETTY YEE FIONA MA TONY THURMOND RICARDO LARA ALEX PADILLA MALIA COHEN District 2 ANTONIO VAZQUEZ District 3 CHIEF OF STAFF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF MIKE SCHAEFER OFFICE OF BOARD OF GOVERNORS STUDENT AID Ann O’Leary District 4 TAX APPEALS COMMUNITY COLLEGES STATE BOARD COMMISSION CALIFORNIA STATE CALIFORNIA OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITIES BOARD OF REGENTS CABINET SECRETARY Mark Ibele Eloy Oakley Marlene Garcia Ana Matosantos Director Chancellor Karen Stapf Walters Timothy P. White Janet Napolitano Executive Director Executive Director Chancellor President APPOINTMENTS COMMUNICATIONS DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF Cathryn Rivera-Hernandez Nathan Click Lindsey Cobia CALIFORNIA FIRST PARTNER CHIEF OF STAFF JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS LEGAL AFFAIRS COMMISSION ON PEACE FAIR POLITICAL OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES OFFICER STANDARDS GAMBLING CONTROL CALIFORNIA LOTTERY Rebecca Beland McNaught Martin Jenkins Catherine E. Lhamon PRACTICES COMMISSION COMMISSION INSPECTOR GENERAL COMMISSION AND TRAINING Alva Johnson Richard Miadich Roy Wesley Marybel Batjer LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS OPERATIONS SPECIAL ADVISOR Joyce Dudley Director Chair Chair James Evans Inspector General President Anthony Williams Erin Suhr Angie Wei Chair BOARD
    [Show full text]
  • MCBA Newsletter November 2020
    Mariposa County Bar Association Volume 3, Issue 31 www.MariposaBar.org [email protected] November 2020 President’s Column Justice Martin J. Jenkins Casey Archer, MCBA President Confirmed to California The Mariposa County Bar Association (“MCBA”) in-person Supreme Court meetings have been suspended since April 2020 due to COVID-19. We Justice Martin J. Jenkins has been confirmed to the look forward to resuming our California Supreme Court. Praised for his "brilliant meetings sometime in 2021 at the intellect, first-class temperament, and boundless Miner’s Roadhouse 140. In the humanity," Justice Jenkins makes history as the first interim, anyone with information regarding free MCLE openly gay California Supreme Court justice and only webinars, or who would like to submit a news article of the third African American man to serve on the state’s general interest, is invited to email the information to highest court. The Judicial Branch of California has [email protected] for inclusion in our monthly issued the following News Release: newsletters. We previously obtained approval from the California State Bar for MCLE credit for an in-person November 10, 2020 -- Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil- presentation by attorney Russell Cook regarding private Sakauye, chair of the Commission on Judicial mediation. Mr. Cook is currently seeking approval from Appointments, announced that the commission today the State Bar to provide the presentation via webinar at a confirmed Justice Martin J. Jenkins as Associate Justice future date to be determined. of the Supreme Court of California. MCBA Membership is $35.00 and includes a listing on the MCBA website at www.MariposaBar.org.
    [Show full text]
  • CSCHS Review Fall/Winter 2020
    California Supreme Court Historical Society Review FALL/WINTER 2020 Not Without a Fight: How California Women Won the Right to Serve as Jurors Above, and on front cover: In November 1911, less than a month after the California suffrage amendment, Los Angeles County seated the first all-woman jury in the state. (Courtesy George Grantham Bain Collection and the Library of Congress.) Woman Jurors in California: Recognizing a Right of Citizenship BY COLLEEN REGAN doption of the Nineteenth Amendment to Like early struggles for the right to vote prior to the United States Constitution in August 1920, adoption of the Nineteenth Amendment, acceptance of Aextending the franchise to women, has been cel- women as jurors arrived on a state-by-state basis. Some ebrated this year with exhibits, marches and films. Less states automatically coupled jury service with the voting celebrated, but equally compelling, is the history of equal franchise, but most, including California, treated voting rights for women as jurors in civil and criminal cases. rights and jury participation as separate issues, requiring A constitutional amendment was necessary to guar- women to wage separate battles to serve as jurors.2 antee voting equality for women because, in 1874, the U.S. Supreme Court had held that the Constitution 2. In eight states (Nevada, Michigan, Delaware, Indiana, Iowa, did not guarantee a citizen the right to vote.1 Therefore, Kentucky, Ohio and Pennsylvania), “as soon as women were although women were recognized to be citizens, vot- accorded the right to vote in such states, their right to serve on ing could be restricted to men.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Profile: Abby Abinanti
    ABBY ABINANTI Abinanti's goal: to help youth who come before her Dennis J. Opatrny The Recorder December 17, 2002 A 12-year-old accused of prostitution is almost swallowed up by the chair she is sitting in as San Francisco Superior Court Commissioner Abby Abinanti reads her probation report. The judge notes the child is from Alameda County, which means her case is probably going to become that county's problem. "You intend to send her back?" Abinanti asks the juvenile probation officer. "Have you found a place to send her?" The answer is, not yet. "Try to find a place," the commissioner says, ordering the child to remain in San Francisco custody while the two counties work out where to place her. Abinanti says she has just one goal: to help the kids who come before her. "Like today, we have a prostitute who's in the fifth grade," Abinanti said. "Where am I supposed to send this kid?" Abinanti is presiding over the detention calendar at the Youth Guidance Center, where she must decide what to do with youthful offenders, many of whom have nowhere to go. Her job is probably one of the most difficult for a judge, since she often deals with pre-teens whose families have turned their backs on them. She must punish the child for his or her crime, while looking into the future to decide how to keep the youngster from becoming a habitual criminal. Abinanti laments the limited resources available to her. "The most difficult part of being out here is that people really don't understand juvenile law that well," Abinanti says in an interview.
    [Show full text]
  • OPPOSITION to EFFORTS to SPLIT the NINTH CIRCUIT (November 6, 2006)
    SUMMARY OF OPPOSITION TO EFFORTS TO SPLIT THE NINTH CIRCUIT (November 6, 2006) Opponents of proposals to split the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals include the vast majority of judges from the Ninth Circuit, elected officials, bar associations, law professors, prominent practitioners, editorial boards, and civil rights, women's rights, disability rights, labor, health, religious, conservation and other national, state and local groups. For links to the letters, testimony and more from the opposition cited below, go to: http://www.judgingtheenvironment.org/issues/page.jsp?itemID=27579314 Click to Jump To: Judges // Elected Officials // Public Interest Groups //Tribes // Bar Associations // Law Professors // Prominent Practitioners // Editorial Boards // Commentary // Opponents of Immediate Action // ______________________________________ A. JUDGES: Click to Jump to: Judges on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: Joint or Individual Letters Judges on the U.S. District Courts: Joint or Individual Letters Judges on U.S. Bankruptcy Courts in the Ninth Circuit i. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges: Includes all but three active judges who have taken a position. 1. Joint Opposition: • 33 Ninth Circuit Court Judges, For Federalism and Separation of Powers, A Court United: A Statement of A Number of Ninth Circuit Judges, Engage, vol. 7, Issue 1, (March 2006) (signatures ordered as in the article): Mary M. Schroeder Procter Hug, Jr. Chief Judge Senior Judge Appointed by Pres. Carter 09/26/79 Appointed by Pres. Carter 09/15/77 James R. Browning Otto R. Skopil Senior Judge Senior Judge Appointed by Pres. Kennedy 09/18/61 Appointed by Pres. Carter 01/01/86 Alfred T. Goodwin Betty B.
    [Show full text]