DOCSLIB.ORG

Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement Case No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement Case No Case 8:18-cv-01548-DOC-ADS Document 163 Filed 07/02/21 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:20213 1 Julian Burns King (Bar No. 298617) [email protected] 2 Elliot J. Siegel (Bar No. 286798) 3 [email protected] KING & SIEGEL LLP 4 724 S. Spring Street, Ste. 201 5 Los Angeles, California 90014 Telephone: (213) 465-4802 6 Facsimile: (213) 465-4803 7 8 Daniel Hutchinson (Bar No. 239458) [email protected] 9 Lin Y. Chan (Bar No. 255027) 10 [email protected] LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & 11 BERNSTEIN, LLP 12 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 13 Telephone: (415) 956-1000 Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 Marcie Le and Karen Dao, individu- Case No. 8:18-cv-01548-DOC (ADSx) ally and on behalf of all others similarly 19 Hon. David O. Carter situated, 20 Special Master Hon. Jay C. Gandhi (Ret.) Plaintiffs, 21 v. PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF 22 Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation; MOTION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR 23 Walgreen Pharmacy Services Mid- west, LLC, an Illinois limited liability FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 24 company; and Walgreens Boots Alli- ACTION SETTLEMENT 25 ance, a Delaware corporation, [Declarations of Elliot J. Siegel, Daniel Defendants. M. Hutchinson, and Bryan Valdez; 26 [Proposed] Order filed concurrently] 27 Hearing Date: August 2, 2021 Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m. 28 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01548 Case 8:18-cv-01548-DOC-ADS Document 163 Filed 07/02/21 Page 2 of 16 Page ID #:20214 1 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on August 2, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. in the 3 United States District Court for the Central District of California, 411 West Fourth 4 Street, Courtroom 9 D, Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516, Plaintiffs Marcie Le and Karen 5 Dao, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, will and hereby do move 6 this Court for entry of an Order: (1) granting final approval of the February 22, 2021 7 Stipulation of Class Action Settlement and Release of Claims (the “Settlement” or 8 “Agreement”) and entering judgment pursuant to the terms of the Settlement; (2) fully 9 and finally approving and directing distribution of the Net Settlement Amount pursuant 10 to the terms of the Settlement; (3) fully and finally approving the award of attorneys’ 11 fees in the amount of $2,266,666.67; (4) fully and finally approving the reimbursement 12 of actual litigation costs in the amount of $254,810.92; (5) fully and finally approving 13 Service Awards totaling $20,000 to named Plaintiffs and Class Representatives Marcie 14 Le and Karen Dao; (6) fully and finally approving Settlement Administration Costs in 15 the amount of $30,000. 16 This motion is based upon this Notice of Motion and Motion; the Memorandum 17 of Points and Authorities in Support thereof; the Declarations of Elliot J. Siegel, Daniel 18 Hutchinson, Marcie Le, Karen Dao, and Bryan Valdez in support thereof; the Agree- 19 ment; the other records, pleadings, and papers filed in this action; and upon such other 20 documentary and verbal evidence or argument as may be presented to the Court during 21 the Final Approval Hearing. 22 Dated: July 2, 2021 Respectfully Submitted, 23 KING & SIEGEL LLP 24 25 By:___________________ 26 Julian Burns King Elliot J. Siegel 27 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class 28 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01548 Case 8:18-cv-01548-DOC-ADS Document 163 Filed 07/02/21 Page 3 of 16 Page ID #:20215 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 3 II. THE PARTIES HAVE GIVEN THE BEST PRACTICABLE NOTICE OF 4 THE SETTLEMENT ........................................................................................... 2 5 6 III. THE COURT SHOULD GRANT FINAL APPROVAL OF THE 7 SETTLEMENT .................................................................................................... 4 LEGAL STANDARD ............................................................................................ 4 8 STRENGTHS OF THE CASE AND RISKS OF CONTINUED LITIGATION .................... 5 9 AMOUNT OFFERED IN SETTLEMENT .................................................................. 7 10 EXTENT OF DISCOVERY COMPLETED AND STAGE OF PROCEEDINGS ................. 7 11 COUNSEL BELIEVES THE SETTLEMENT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST 12 OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASS .............................................................................. 9 13 THERE ARE NO OBJECTORS AND FEW OPT-OUTS ............................................. 9 14 IV. THE REQUESTED FEES, EXPENSES, AND SERVICE AWARDS 15 ARE REASONABLE ......................................................................................... 10 16 V. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................... 10 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01548 Case 8:18-cv-01548-DOC-ADS Document 163 Filed 07/02/21 Page 4 of 16 Page ID #:20216 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 1 CASES 2 Barnes v. Equinox Grp., Inc., 3 No. C 10-3586 LB, 2013 WL 3988804 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2013) ..................... 4 4 Bolton v. U.S. Nursing Corp., No. C 12-4466 LB, 2013 WL 5700403 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2013) .................... 8 5 Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156 (1974) ........................................................................................... 2 6 Churchill Village v. Gen. Elec., 7 361 F.3d 566 (9th Cir. 2004) .............................................................................. 4 City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp., 8 495 F.2d 448 (2nd Cir. 1974) ............................................................................. 6 9 Class Plaintiffs v. City of Seattle, 955 F.2d 1268 (9th Cir. 1992) ............................................................................ 8 10 Ellis v. Naval Air Rework Facility, 87 F.R.D. 15 (N.D. Cal. 1980), aff’d, 661 F.2d 939 (9th Cir. 1981) ................. 7 11 Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp., 12 150 F.3d 1011 (9th Cir. 1998) ........................................................................ 4, 8 In re Cylink Sec. Litig., 13 274 F. Supp. 2d 1109 (N.D. Cal. 2003) .............................................................. 6 14 In re Mego Fin. Corp. Sec. Litig., 213 F.3d 454 (9th Cir. 2000) .............................................................................. 3 15 In re Syncor ERISA Litig., 516 F.3d 1095 (9th Cir. 2008) ............................................................................ 4 16 Isby v. Bayh, 17 75 F.3d 1191 (7th Cir. 1996) .............................................................................. 7 Linney v. Cellular Alaska P’ship, 18 151 F.3d 1234 (9th Cir. 1998) ............................................................................ 5 19 Ma v. Covidien Holding, Inc., No. 12-02161, 2014 WL 360196 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2014) .............................. 5 20 Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306 (1950) ........................................................................................... 2 21 Nat’l Rural Telecomms. Coop. v. DirecTV, Inc., 22 221 F.R.D. 523 (C.D. Cal. 2004)................................................................ 3, 4, 5 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, 23 472 U.S. 797 (1985) ........................................................................................... 2 24 Rodriguez v. West Publ’g Corp., 563 F.3d 948 (9th Cir. 2009) .............................................................................. 4 25 Torrisi v. Tucson Elec. Power Co., 8 F.3d 1370 (9th Cir. 1993) ................................................................................ 3 26 Wren v. RGIS Inventory Specialists, 27 No. C-06-05778 JCS, 2011 WL 1230826 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2011) .................. 4 28 ii PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01548 Case 8:18-cv-01548-DOC-ADS Document 163 Filed 07/02/21 Page 5 of 16 Page ID #:20217 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 1 (continued) 2 RULES 3 Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 23(c)(2)(B) ................................................................................. 1 Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 23(e)(1) ...................................................................................... 3 4 Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 23(e)(2) ...................................................................................... 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 iii PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 8:18-CV-01548 Case 8:18-cv-01548-DOC-ADS Document 163 Filed 07/02/21 Page 6 of 16 Page ID #:20218 1 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 2 I. INTRODUCTION 3 This motion seeks final approval of a wage-and-hour class action settlement be- 4 tween Plaintiffs Marcie Le and Karen Dao and Defendants Walgreen Co., Walgreen 5 Pharmacy Services Midwest, LLC, and Walgreens Boots Alliance (“Walgreens”) (col- 6 lectively, the “Parties”). See Dkt. No. 155-3 (“Settlement Agreement”). 7 Pursuant to the Court’s April 1, 2021 Order Directing Notice (Dkt. No. 159), 8 notice was mailed to all Class Members1 on May 20, 2021. See July 2, 2021 Declara- 9 tion of Elliot J. Siegel (“Siegel Decl.”) ¶ 31; June 28, 2021 Declaration of Bryan Val- 10 dez (“Valdez Decl.”) ¶ 6. The reaction of Class Members to the Settlement has been 11 overwhelmingly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tennessee State Library and Archives WASHINGTON FAMILY PAPERS
    State of Tennessee Department of State Tennessee State Library and Archives 403 Seventh Avenue North Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0312 WASHINGTON FAMILY PAPERS, 1796-1962 Processed by Harry A. Stokes Accession numbers: 83-001; 84-001; 89-131 Microfilm accession number: Mf. 961 Dates completed: Jan. 24, 1983; Mar. 16, 1984 Locations: XVII-F-K-1; VI-C-1v; oversize flat storage - top of map cases The Washington Family Papers, 1796-1962, are centered around “Wessyngton,” the Washington family home built in 1818 by Joseph Washington, tobacco planter, near Cedar Hill in Robertson County, Tennessee. The papers contain records of the plantation as well as the correspondence of four generations: Joseph Washington (1770-1848), tobacco planter; George Augustine Washington (1815-1892), tobacco planter, railroad executive, and capitalist; Joseph Edwin Washington (1851-1915), Congressman and tobacco farmer; and George Augustine Washington (1879- 1964), attorney, tobacco farmer, and genealogist. The papers were gifts of Mrs. Mary Kinsolving, Baltimore, Md.; Hickman Price, Jr., Palm Beach, Fla.; and Mrs. Anne K. Talbott, Cookeville, Tenn. Linear feet of shelf space occupied: 64 Approximate number of items: ca. 11,200 Single photocopies of unpublished writings in the Washington Family Papers may be made for purposes of scholarly research. WASHINGTON FAMILY PAPERS , 1796-1962 7/if. 91/ Microf1lm Container List Reel No . : 1. Box 1, folder 1 to Box 2, folder 10 2. Box 2, folder 11 to Box 5 , folder 9 3. Box 5, folder 10 to Box 8 , folder 8 4. Box 8. folder 9 to Box 10, folder 16 5. Box 10, folder 17 to Box 13, folder 18 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Official U.S. Bulletin
    : — : : : : k PVBLISHEn BJilLY under order of THE PRESIDENT of THE UNITED STATES by COMMITTEE on PUBLIC INFORMATION GEORGE CREEL, Chairman -k * ic COMPLETE Record of U. S, GOVERNMENT Activities VoL. 3 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, FEBRUAEY 11, 1919. No. 535 TRADE WITH FINLAND MAY BE ORDERS TO COMPLETE PAY Army Post Exchanges RESUMED UNDER REGULATION OF SOLDIERS IN ARREARS Are Forbidden to Sell Unauthorized Insignia SAYS THE WAR TRADE BOARD ARRIVING AT CAMPS WITH The War Department authorizes OUTLINE OF PROCEDURE IS GIVEN A “CONVALESCENT CENTER” publication of the following Under direction of the Secretary List of Commodities Which Do Not of War an order has been issued as INSTRUCTIONS ALSO follows Require Import Certificates From 1. “ It has been brought to the Inter-Allied Trade Committee SENT ARMY HOSPITALS attention of the War Department if that post exchanges and similar Applications Are in Order. Detachment Commanders places are selling unauthorized in- signia such as service ribbons and The War Trade Board announces, in a and Disbursing Officers gold and silver stars to be worn on new ruling (W. T. B. R. 590), supple- the uniform.” Required to See That En- menting AV. T. B. R. 577, issued February 2. “ Responsible officers will take 5, 1919, that arrangements have now been immediate steps to have such listed Men Are Promptly made whereby both export shipments to practice discontinued by post ex- and import shipments from Finland may Paid Reports to changes and stores under their im- — Be Made be resumed. mediate jurisdiction. At the same All shipments for export to tlie above- by Wire Direct to Director time every effort will be made to mentioned country must be covered by an influence stores located near posts, of Finance, War Depart- import certificate issued by the interallied camps, or cantonments, discon- to trade committee, at Helsingfors, except tinue the practice.” ment, Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • PETITIONER Vs
    AMENDED (3) No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES LINDA ANN WRIGHT -PETITIONER vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. -RESPONDENT(S) ON PETITION FOR AN EXTRAORDINARY WRIT FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT OF MANDAMUS LINDA ANN WRIGHT 300 Elizabeth Drive. Apartment 3108 Pittsburgh. Pennsylvania. 15220 (4121715-7733 IV. QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Was there a concerted effort, from 2007-Present to deny petitioner her Due Process, under the 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the U.S.? 2. If the Petitioner is not an Attorney, and several Judges consider her lacking, should they have Authorized Counsel since she produced the facts? 3. Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the denial of Disqualification of Judges deny the Petitioner, Due Process and Redress in not having an investigation? 4. Was the Chief Judge serving as counsel for the Named Judges? Should she have recused herself, was she involved in the naming of the Federal Building, named after one of the Judges? 5. Was Judge Owens while serving in the Texas Supreme Court, aware of Case No. 15-00214, in USDC Texas Northern District, did it affect her Decision? 6. Did the Fifth Circuit Appellate Review Board in not calling for an investigation into the facts submitted by Appellant/ Petitioner Obstructed Justice and Rule Article V, 28 U..C § 358., therefor denying Due Process, Redress? 7. Was there a concerted effort by California, Texas, and the U.S. Courts, to deny Petitioner’s Constitutional, Civil, Financial Rights as an American Citizen? 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement 1
    *^b THE BOOK OF THE STATES .\ • I January, 1949 "'Sto >c THE COUNCIL OF STATE'GOVERNMENTS CHICAGO • ••• • • ••'. •" • • • • • 1 ••• • • I* »• - • • . * • ^ • • • • • • 1 ( • 1* #* t 4 •• -• ', 1 • .1 :.• . -.' . • - •>»»'• • H- • f' ' • • • • J -•» J COPYRIGHT, 1949, BY THE COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS jk •J . • ) • • • PBir/Tfili i;? THE'UNIfTED STATES OF AMERICA S\ A ' •• • FOREWORD 'he Book of the States, of which this volume is a supplement, is designed rto provide an authoritative source of information on-^state activities, administrations, legislatures, services, problems, and progressi It also reports on work done by the Council of State Governments, the cpm- missions on interstate cooperation, and other agencies concepned with intergovernmental problems. The present suppkinent to the 1948-1949 edition brings up to date, on the basis of information receivjed.from the states by the end of Novem­ ber, 1948^, the* names of the principal elective administrative officers of the states and of the members of their legislatures. Necessarily, most of the lists of legislators are unofficial, final certification hot having been possible so soon after the election of November 2. In some cases post­ election contests were pending;. However, every effort for accuracy has been made by state officials who provided the lists aiid by the CouncJLl_ of State Governments. » A second 1949. supplement, to be issued in July, will list appointive administrative officers in all the states, and also their elective officers and legislators, with any revisions of the. present rosters that may be required. ^ Thus the basic, biennial ^oo/t q/7^? States and its two supplements offer comprehensive information on the work of state governments, and current, convenient directories of the men and women who constitute those governments, both in their administrative organizations and in their legislatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Case: 13-16918, 05/30/2014, ID: 9114889, Dktentry: 78-1, Page 1 of 64
    Case: 13-16918, 05/30/2014, ID: 9114889, DktEntry: 78-1, Page 1 of 64 Case No. 13-16819 (Consolidated with Nos. 13-16918, 13-16919, 13-16929, 13-16936, 13-17028, 13-17097) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANGEL FRALEY, ET AL., Plaintiffs and Appellees, C.M.D., ET AL., Intervenors, Plaintiffs, and Appellees, JO BATMAN, ET AL., Objectors and Appellants v. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant and Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California No. 11-cv-0126, Hon. Richard Seeborg, presiding ANSWERING BRIEF OF PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES SUSAN MAINZER, ET AL. THE ARNS LAW FIRM JONATHAN JAFFE LAW Robert S. Arns (SBN 65071) Jonathan M. Jaffe, Esq. (SBN 267012) 3055 Hillegass Avenue Jonathan E. Davis (SBN 191346) Berkeley, CA 94705 Steven R. Weinmann (SBN 190956) Telephone: (510) 725-4293 515 Folsom Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 495-7800 Facsimile: (415) 495-7888 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Case: 13-16918, 05/30/2014, ID: 9114889, DktEntry: 78-1, Page 2 of 64 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT ............................................................. 1 II. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1 III. SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ........................................................... 7 IV. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ................. 10 A. Background ................................................................................................. 10 B. Settlement Negotiations
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of BAINBRIDGE ISLAND 2014 LODGING/TOURISM FUND PROPOSAL COVER SHEET Project Name: BI Historical Museum Added Hours ______
    CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND 2014 LODGING/TOURISM FUND PROPOSAL COVER SHEET Project Name: BI Historical Museum Added Hours __________________________________________ Name of Applicant Organization: Bainbridge Island Historical Museum_________________________________________ Applicant Organization IRS Chapter 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(6) status and Tax ID Number: 501 (c) (3) Tax ID 91-1037866_______________________________________________ Date of Incorporation as a Washington State Corporation and UBI Number: 1978___UBI Number 601_086_880____________________________________________ Primary Contact: Henry R. Helm, Executive Director____________________________________________ Mailing Address: 215 Ericksen Ave NE, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110__________________________ Email(s): [email protected] __________________________________ Day phone: 206-842-2773 __ Cell phone: 206-612-5105 ________ Number of pages in proposal: _______ Under the definition of “tourism promotion”, which of the following does your proposal include? Please mark all that apply and how much is requested in each category: √ Funding Category Dollar Amount Advertising, publicizing or otherwise distributing information for the purpose of attracting and welcoming tourists Developing strategies to expand tourism Operating tourism promotion agencies Marketing and operations of special festivals or events ⌧ Operation of a tourism-related facility* $15,000 *If the proposal requests funds for operation a tourism-related facility, please indicate the legal owner of that facility:
    [Show full text]
  • Greece Town Officers
    Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Miscellaneous Directories Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Miscellaneous Directories GREECE TOWN OFFICERS Town Hall, 2505 Ridge road West Supervisor Gordon A. Howe ClerkH. T. Hughes. DeputyMary F. Mitchell Receiver Taxes & Assessments Alexander Johnstone Councilmen Clifford E. Clarke, Leon L. Cox, Andrew J. Schell, Harold M. Veness Justices Alfred L. Clifford, G. Clarence Combs Assessors Dellamer Denise, chairman; Frank D. Herman, Deidrich K. Millls Town Supt Eli G. Thompson Building Inspector Roy S. Cole School Directors F. Lillian Richards, Matie Cunningham Welfare Officer Mathew H. Fairbanks. Deputy Emmett V. Cooper Health Officer Dr. George E. Sanders Nurses Ethel H. Davidson, Mary Humphrey Planning Board W. Chandler Knapp, chairman; John Kimpson, secretary; Arthur Koerner, Samuel Thayer, Howard O. Beuckman Attendance Officer George J. Clarke FIRE DEPARTMENT Barnard Fire Dept. Inc. 3084 Dewey av., phone Charlotte 1000 Braddock Hts. Fire Dept Second av. cor. Lake rd. Greece Ridge Fire Dept. Inc. 2550 Ridge rd. West, phone Glenwood 166 North Greece Fire Dept. Latta rd., phone Charlotte 929 F-2 POLICE DEPARTMENT Greece Police HeadquartersMilton H. Carter chief, 3084 Dewey av., phone Charlotte 630 Police Howard Coner, Chas. G. DeForest, Harry Dixson, Wm. B. Gray, Frank Pitcher Constable Harry Dinger PUBLIC SCHOOLS Central School No. 1Hoover dr., Kenneth E. Jackson, principal; 12 teachers District School No. 2Latta rd.; 1 teacher District School No. 5 Latta rd., 2 teachers District School No. 6College av., 2 teachers District School No. 7Frisbee Hill rd.; 1 teacher District School No. 9 Long Pond rd. ; 2 teachers District School No.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The
    Case 2:17-cv-01826-TSZ Document 153 Filed 06/11/20 Page 1 of 171 1 THE HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 10 KEVIN PINE, individually and on behalf Case No. 17-cv-1826 11 of all others similarly situated, DECLARATION OF DANIEL M. 12 Plaintiff, HUTCHINSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 13 v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS, AND SERVICE AWARDS TO THE 14 A PLACE FOR MOM, INC., a Delaware PLAINTIFFS corporation, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DECLARATION OF DANIEL M. HUTCHINSON LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Case No. 17-cv-1826 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor 1836300.2 San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Tel. 415.956.1000 • Fax 415.956.1008 Case 2:17-cv-01826-TSZ Document 153 Filed 06/11/20 Page 2 of 171 1 I, Daniel M. Hutchinson, declare as follows: 2 1. I am a partner in of the law firm of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP 3 (“LCHB”), co-counsel of record for Plaintiff in this matter. 4 2. I am admitted to practice pro hac vice before this Court and am a member in good 5 standing of the bar of the State of California; the United States District Court for the Central, 6 Northern, and Southern Districts of California; the United States District Court for the Eastern 7 District of Wisconsin; and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, and 8 Eleventh Circuits.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage Record Index 1922-1938 Images Can Be Accessed in the Indiana Room
    Marriage Record Index 1922-1938 Images can be accessed in the Indiana Room. Call (812)949-3527 for more information. Groom Bride Marriage Date Image Aaron, Elza Antle, Marion 8/12/1928 026-048 Abbott, Charles Ruby, Hallie June 8/19/1935 030-580 Abbott, Elmer Beach, Hazel 12/9/1922 022-243 Abbott, Leonard H. Robinson, Berta 4/30/1926 024-324 Abel, Oscar C. Ringle, Alice M. 1/11/1930 027-067 Abell, Lawrence A. Childers, Velva 4/28/1930 027-154 Abell, Steve Blakeman, Mary Elizabeth 12/12/1928 026-207 Abernathy, Pete B. Scholl, Lorena 10/15/1926 024-533 Abram, Howard Henry Abram, Elizabeth F. 3/24/1934 029-414 Absher, Roy Elgin Turner, Georgia Lillian 4/17/1926 024-311 Ackerman, Emil Becht, Martha 10/18/1927 025-380 Acton, Dewey Baker, Mary Cathrine 3/17/1923 022-340 Adam, Herman Glen Harpe, Mary Allia 4/11/1936 031-273 Adam, Herman Glenn Hinton, Esther 8/13/1927 025-282 Adams, Adelbert Pope, Thelma 7/14/1927 025-255 Adams, Ancil Logan, Jr. Eiler, Lillian Mae 4/8/1933 028-570 Adams, Cecil A. Johnson, Mary E. 12/21/1923 022-706 Adams, Crozier E. Sparks, Sarah 4/1/1936 031-250 Adams, Earl Snook, Charlotte 1/5/1935 030-250 Adams, Harry Meyer, Lillian M. 10/21/1927 025-376 Adams, Herman Glen Smith, Hazel Irene 2/28/1925 023-502 Adams, James O. Hallet, Louise M. 4/3/1931 027-476 Adams, Lloyd Kirsch, Madge 6/7/1932 028-274 Adams, Robert A.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Agreement Is Entered Into by Plaintiffs on Behalf of Themselves and 3 the Class Members, and Defendant Reckitt Benckiser, LLC
    Case 3:17-cv-03529-VC Document 221-2 Filed 05/12/21 Page 2 of 141 1 BLOOD HURST & O’REARDON, LLP TIMOTHY G. BLOOD (149343) 2 THOMAS J. O’REARDON II (247952) 501 West Broadway, Suite 1490 3 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: 619/338-1100 4 619/338-1101 (fax) [email protected] 5 [email protected] 6 Class Counsel 7 [Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 GORDON NOBORU YAMAGATA and Case No. 3:17-cv-03529-VC STAMATIS F. PELARDIS, individually and 11 on behalf of all others similarly situated, STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT 12 Plaintiffs, LLP CLASS ACTION , 13 v. 14 RECKITT BENCKISER LLC, District Judge Vince Chhabria EARDON Courtroom 4, 17th Floor 15 Defendant. O’ R Complaint Filed: June 19, 2017 & 16 Trial Date: N/A URST 17 H 18 LOOD LOOD B 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:17-cv-03529-VC 00177902 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT Case 3:17-cv-03529-VC Document 221-2 Filed 05/12/21 Page 3 of 141 1 TABLE OF EXHIBITS 2 Document Exhibit Number 3 Preliminary Approval Order ................................................................................................. 1 4 Final Approval Order ............................................................................................................ 2 5 Final Judgment ..................................................................................................................... 3 6 Class Notice Program ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 Nominations Submitted to The
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 Nominations Submitted to the Senate November 21, 2014 The following list does not include promotions of members of the Uniformed Services, nominations to the Service Academies, or nominations of Foreign Service Officers. Submitted January 6 Jill A. Pryor, of Georgia, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the 11th Circuit, vice Stanley F. Birch, Jr., retired. Carolyn B. McHugh, of Utah, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the 10th Circuit, vice Michael R. Murphy, retired. Michelle T. Friedland, of California, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, vice Raymond C. Fisher, retired. Nancy L. Moritz, of Kansas, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the 10th Circuit, vice Deanell Reece Tacha, retired. John B. Owens, of California, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, vice Stephen S. Trott, retired. David Jeremiah Barron, of Massachusetts, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the First Circuit, vice Michael Boudin, retired. Robin S. Rosenbaum, of Florida, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the 11th Circuit, vice Rosemary Barkett, resigned. Julie E. Carnes, of Georgia, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the 11th Circuit, vice James Larry Edmondson, retired. Gregg Jeffrey Costa, of Texas, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, vice Fortunato P. Benavides, retired. Rosemary Márquez, of Arizona, to be U.S. District Judge for the District of Arizona, vice Frank R. Zapata, retired. Pamela L. Reeves, of Tennessee, to be U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, vice Thomas W. Phillips, retiring.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit 4 Case 5:18-Cv-06164-EJD Document 88-4 Filed 09/28/20 Page 2 of 11
    Case 5:18-cv-06164-EJD Document 88-4 Filed 09/28/20 Page 1 of 11 Exhibit 4 Case 5:18-cv-06164-EJD Document 88-4 Filed 09/28/20 Page 2 of 11 All dollar amounts are in millions Primary Cross-Check % of Common Multiplier Case Name Cite Judge Fee Order Date Case Type Fee $ Approved Calculation Common Fund $ Lodestar $ Method Fund Approved Approved Method Craft v. Cty. of San 1 Bernardino,, 1124 624 F. Supp. 2d 1113 Stephen G. Larson April 1, 2008 Civil Rights $ 6.375 CF Lodestar $ 25.648 25% $ 1.200 5.20 2 Kurihara v. Best Buy Co. 2010 WL 11575623 Marilyn Hall Patel April 1, 2010 Wage & Hour $ 0.898 Lodestar $ 5.000 6% $ 0.718 1.25 Garner v. State Farm Breach od 3 Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 2010 WL 1687829 Claudia Wilken April 22, 2010 Contract $ 4.500 CF Lodestar $ 15.000 30% <2 4 Briggs v. United States 2010 WL 1759457 William Alsup April 30, 2010 debt collection $ 1.120 Lodestar $ 7.400 $ 1.119 1.00 Privay/Data 5 Lane v. Facebook, Inc. 2010 WL 2076916 Richard Seeborg May 24, 2010 Breach $ 2.322 Lodestar $ 9.510 24% $ 1.161 2.00 6 In re LDK Solar Sec. Litig. 2010 WL 3001384 William Alsup July 29, 2010 Securities $ 16.000 $ 16.000 13.75% $ 7.600 0.29 In re WAL–MART STORES, INC. WAGE AND 7 HOUR LITIGATION 2011 WL 31266 Saundra Brown Armstrong January 5, 2011 Wage & Hour $ 23.220 CF Lodestar $86-$43 27% of ceiling ~$16.6 1.40 Chu v.
    [Show full text]