DOCSLIB.ORG

Type Your Frontispiece Or Quote Page Here

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Memorial University Research Repository DEFENDING THE INDEFENSIBLE? THE USE OF ARGUMENTATION, LEGITIMATION, AND OTHERING IN DEBATES ON REFUGEES IN THE CANADIAN HOUSE OF COMMONS, 2010-2012 by © James Thomas Ernest Baker A Thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology Faculty of Arts Memorial University of Newfoundland April 2015 St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador Abstract The goal of this thesis is to investigate language use among elite parliamentarians in debates related to refugee asylum. It challenges the non-political “taken for granted” notions that many parliamentarians employ in their speeches and, using Critical Discourse Analysis, seeks to understand how argumentation, legitimation, and Othering strategies are used to support and reinforce their positions. While the Conservative government contends that Bill C-11: The Balanced Refugee Reform Act and Bill C-31: Protecting Canada’s Immigration System Act are aimed at refugee reform and designed to target “criminal middlemen,” I argue that their approach is actually aimed at restricting refugee asylum, despite the fact that it is an internationally recognized treaty right. To augment my efforts, I frame my analysis around the work of two key theorists: Antonio Gramsci and Zygmunt Bauman. The Gramscian model of cultural hegemony informs my thesis in at least two key ways: first, I argue that language use (specifically, the negative portrayal of asylum seekers) is manipulated for the sole purpose of presenting refugee claimants as criminals; second, by criminalizing certain groups, the Conservative government is able to put forward a particular worldview that portrays certain types of refugees as legitimate, and therefore deserving of protection. I contend, however, that cultural hegemony is insufficient to explain how the Conservatives are able to propagate this worldview given that cultural hegemony is primarily driven by ideology. While contemporary Canadian political ideologies differ significantly, opposition parties nonetheless unintentionally reproduce a Conservative worldview regarding asylum seekers. In its place, I argue that ii banal hegemony helps to explain this discrepancy. Bauman’s discussion of mobility is relevant given that I assess how asylum seekers are framed as illegals whose ability to seek asylum is restrained. Restricting or controlling mobility is central to the Conservative defense precisely because those who cannot arrive in Canada are unable to make an asylum claim. In fact, over the past few years, there has been a movement to “push the border out.” I conclude that the Conservative defense is not only fallacious, untenable, and prejudicial but designed to portray asylum seekers are criminals, fraudsters, and security threats. This thesis adds to the extant literature on Critical Discourse Analysis from a Canadian parliamentary perspective and describes how politics is constituted by, and through, language. Moreover, it offers a sociological understanding of how parliamentary debates help to produce and reproduce social inequality and prejudice. iii Acknowledgements I firmly believe that writing the acknowledgement section of my PhD thesis is perhaps the most difficult process simply because someone – quite unintentionally – might be left out. I want to begin by stating unequivocally that the order that my acknowledgements appear in no way reflects a line order of importance. Each of you named here specifically, and the many more that are not, have helped me complete this almost Herculean task. But alas I have to begin with someone… My supervisor, Stephen H. Riggins, has been a shining light throughout this process and I have no doubt that without his support and guidance I would not be writing this section at all. I also want to doubly thank my supervisory committee, Mark Stoddart and Arthur Sullivan, whose input and direction, has made this thesis a much stronger document. I also want to thank Karen Stanbridge and Luke Ashworth who graciously allowed me to use a room in the Sociology and Political Science Departments to help expedite the writing process. It is greatly appreciated. Perhaps equally as important are Bridget Foster and Megan Morris, the two most important women in my life save for my mother. Both these individuals took a chance and hired me at the Association for New Canadians and, despite their better judgement, did not fire me! It truly was this fortuitous encounter that spurred my interest in immigration, migration, and refugee studies. Bridget, who at this writing is retired after nearly forty years serving the immigration and settlement sector, has been extremely supportive of my PhD and always found some way to send me to a conference. I especially owe a significant debt of gratitude to Megan, who has made me a much better iv writer and critical thinker (despite me being obstinate!). I also want to thank my ANC colleague Ken Walsh, who was always a good sounding board for my grievances. I also want to thank all my colleagues, past and present, at the ANC, who had to put up with my sometimes (all the time) sourpuss demeanour over the years. I also want to thank Chris Martin and April Lee whose Saturday night board games helped to maintain my sanity throughout the latter part of this process. You have no idea how much these nights helped me relax enough to tackle the next set of edits for my Ph.D. Perhaps finally – though not last and certainly not least – my mother, Helen Baker, whose love and support ensured I would succeed. I still remember that September day back in 1993 when you refused to give in to my fear and apprehension – you have no idea how important that decision would be to my life and career. As a sign of my love for you, I am dedicating this thesis to you. v Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iv Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... ix List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... x Chapter One: Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 Politics as Talk and Text .................................................................................................. 3 Rationale for the Study .................................................................................................... 5 The Legislative Process in Canada .................................................................................. 7 Placing the Study in Context: Social and Political Events, 2010-12 ............................... 9 Political Parties ............................................................................................................ 9 Polling Support: 2009-2010 ....................................................................................... 11 Polling Support: 2011-2012 ....................................................................................... 12 Public Attitudes: Refugees and Immigration ............................................................. 13 Immigration Policy .................................................................................................... 15 Research Questions ........................................................................................................ 17 Conceptual Definitions .................................................................................................. 19 Case Study Approach ..................................................................................................... 20 Limitations of the Research ........................................................................................... 21 Outline of the Thesis ...................................................................................................... 23 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 24 Chapter Two: Methodological Framework ....................................................................... 26 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 26 Discourse Analysis versus Critical Discourse Analysis ................................................ 27 Critical Discourse Analysis ............................................................................................ 31 Political Discourse ......................................................................................................... 35 Argumentation, Legitimation, and Othering .................................................................. 37 Argumentation ..........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Argumentation and Fallacies in Creationist Writings Against Evolutionary Theory Petteri Nieminen1,2* and Anne-Mari Mustonen1

    Argumentation and Fallacies in Creationist Writings Against Evolutionary Theory Petteri Nieminen1,2* and Anne-Mari Mustonen1

    Nieminen and Mustonen Evolution: Education and Outreach 2014, 7:11 http://www.evolution-outreach.com/content/7/1/11 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Argumentation and fallacies in creationist writings against evolutionary theory Petteri Nieminen1,2* and Anne-Mari Mustonen1 Abstract Background: The creationist–evolutionist conflict is perhaps the most significant example of a debate about a well-supported scientific theory not readily accepted by the public. Methods: We analyzed creationist texts according to type (young earth creationism, old earth creationism or intelligent design) and context (with or without discussion of “scientific” data). Results: The analysis revealed numerous fallacies including the direct ad hominem—portraying evolutionists as racists, unreliable or gullible—and the indirect ad hominem, where evolutionists are accused of breaking the rules of debate that they themselves have dictated. Poisoning the well fallacy stated that evolutionists would not consider supernatural explanations in any situation due to their pre-existing refusal of theism. Appeals to consequences and guilt by association linked evolutionary theory to atrocities, and slippery slopes to abortion, euthanasia and genocide. False dilemmas, hasty generalizations and straw man fallacies were also common. The prevalence of these fallacies was equal in young earth creationism and intelligent design/old earth creationism. The direct and indirect ad hominem were also prevalent in pro-evolutionary texts. Conclusions: While the fallacious arguments are irrelevant when discussing evolutionary theory from the scientific point of view, they can be effective for the reception of creationist claims, especially if the audience has biases. Thus, the recognition of these fallacies and their dismissal as irrelevant should be accompanied by attempts to avoid counter-fallacies and by the recognition of the context, in which the fallacies are presented.
  • BACKBENCHERS So in Election Here’S to You, Mr

    BACKBENCHERS So in Election Here’S to You, Mr

    Twitter matters American political satirist Stephen Colbert, host of his and even more SPEAKER smash show The Colbert Report, BACKBENCHERS so in Election Here’s to you, Mr. Milliken. poked fun at Canadian House Speaker Peter politics last week. p. 2 Former NDP MP Wendy Lill Campaign 2011. p. 2 Milliken left the House of is the writer behind CBC Commons with a little Radio’s Backbenchers. more dignity. p. 8 COLBERT Heard on the Hill p. 2 TWITTER TWENTY-SECOND YEAR, NO. 1082 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSWEEKLY MONDAY, APRIL 4, 2011 $4.00 Tories running ELECTION CAMPAIGN 2011 Lobbyists ‘pissed’ leaner war room, Prime Minister Stephen Harper on the hustings they can’t work on focused on election campaign, winning majority This campaign’s say it’s against their This election campaign’s war room Charter rights has 75 to 90 staffers, with the vast majority handling logistics of about one man Lobbying Commissioner Karen the Prime Minister’s tour. Shepherd tells lobbyists that working on a political By KRISTEN SHANE and how he’s run campaign advances private The Conservatives are running interests of public office holder. a leaner war room and a national campaign made up mostly of cam- the government By BEA VONGDOUANGCHANH paign veterans, some in new roles, whose goal is to persuade Canadi- Lobbyists are “frustrated” they ans to re-elect a “solid, stable Con- can’t work on the federal elec- servative government” to continue It’s a Harperendum, a tion campaign but vow to speak Canada’s economic recovery or risk out against a regulation that they a coalition government headed by national verdict on this think could be an unconstitutional Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff.
  • Section 6: Reporting Likelihood Ratios Components

    Section 6: Reporting Likelihood Ratios Components

    Section 6: Reporting Likelihood Ratios Components • Hierarchy of propositions • Formulating propositions • Communicating LRs Section 6 Slide 2 Likelihood Ratio The LR assigns a numerical value in favor or against one propo- sition over another: Pr(EjHp;I) LR = ; Pr(EjHd;I) where Hp typically aligns with the prosecution case, Hd is a reasonable alternative consistent with the defense case, and I is the relevant background information. Section 6 Slide 3 Setting Propositions • The value for the LR will depend on the propositions chosen: different sets of propositions will lead to different LRs. • Choosing the appropriate pair of propositions can therefore be just as important as the DNA analysis itself. Section 6 Slide 4 Hierarchy of Propositions Evett & Cook (1998) established the following hierarchy of propositions: Level Scale Example III Offense Hp: The suspect raped the complainant. Hd: Some other person raped the complainant. II Activity Hp: The suspect had intercourse with the complainant. Hd: Some other person had intercourse with the complainant. I Source Hp: The semen came from the suspect. Hd: The semen came from an unknown person. 0 Sub-source Hp: The DNA in the sample came from the suspect. Hd: The DNA in the sample came from an unknown person. Section 6 Slide 5 Hierarchy of Propositions • The offense level deals with the ultimate issue of guilt/ innocence, which are outside the domain of the forensic scientist. • The activity level associates a DNA profile or evidence source with the crime itself, and there may be occasions where a scientist can address this level. • The source level associates a DNA profile or evidence item with a particular body fluid or individual source.
  • The Comparative Politics of E-Cigarette Regulation in Australia, Canada and New Zealand by Alex C

    The Comparative Politics of E-Cigarette Regulation in Australia, Canada and New Zealand by Alex C

    Formulating a Regulatory Stance: The Comparative Politics of E-Cigarette Regulation in Australia, Canada and New Zealand by Alex C. Liber A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Health Services Organizations and Policy) in The University of Michigan 2020 Doctoral Committee: Professor Scott Greer, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Holly Jarman, Co-Chair Professor Daniel Béland, McGill University Professor Paula Lantz Alex C. Liber [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7863-3906 © Alex C. Liber 2020 Dedication For Lindsey and Sophia. I love you both to the ends of the earth and am eternally grateful for your tolerance of this project. ii Acknowledgments To my family – Lindsey, you made the greatest sacrifices that allowed this project to come to fruition. You moved away from your family to Michigan. You allowed me to conduct two months of fieldwork when you were pregnant with our daughter. You helped drafts come together and were a constant sounding board and confidant throughout the long process of writing. This would not have been possible without you. Sophia, Poe, and Jo served as motivation for this project and a distraction from it when each was necessary. Mom, Dad, Chad, Max, Julian, and Olivia, as well as Papa Ernie and Grandma Audrey all, helped build the road that I was able to safely walk down in the pursuit of this doctorate. You served as role models, supports, and friends that I could lean on as I grew into my career and adulthood. Lisa, Tony, and Jessica Suarez stepped up to aid Lindsey and me with childcare amid a move, a career transition, and a pandemic.
  • Ottawa Gives $2 Million for Hansen Fellow Plan

    Ottawa Gives $2 Million for Hansen Fellow Plan

    yBC t\i-chW*s Seiial Enrolment highest in history By PAULA MARTIN "It certainly Enrolment at UBC for 1989-90 has indicates a trend. hit its highest level ever and admissions Engineering is an applications have risen significantly over example of a previous years, figures compiled by the professional pro­ Registrar's Office show. gram that is re­ UBC's winter session enrolment is ally cyclical in up by 2.2 per cent or 612 students over terms of de­ last year, said Registrar Richard Spencer. mand." "This is the largest enrolment we've The Applied ever had," said Spencer of the 28,461 ScienceFaculty's Spencer students now studying at UBC. "It was School of Nurs­ partly by design because we did set out ing saw a 35 per cent increase in first to take in more graduate students and year enrolment, largely due to the incor­ slightly more undergraduates." poration of VGH' s nursing program into About three-quarters of the 28,461 the UBC program. are full-time students and the rest are Enrolment in the Faculty of Graduate classified as part-time—those who take Studies went up by 200 students, or just less than 80 per cent of a full program. under five per cent. The number of Undergraduate admissions applica­ graduate students for this year stands at tions went up seven per cent over last 4,408. year and 30 per cent over 1987, Spencer The Faculty of Commerce and Busi­ said. ness Administration enroled 420 stu­ "When you look at an institution like dents in the first year of its program, 20 UBC, which has an enrolment limit, more than last year.
  • Alternative North Americas: What Canada and The

    Alternative North Americas: What Canada and The

    ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS What Canada and the United States Can Learn from Each Other David T. Jones ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Copyright © 2014 by David T. Jones All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, scanned, or distributed in any printed or electronic form without permission. Please do not participate in or encourage piracy of copyrighted materials in violation of author’s rights. Published online. ISBN: 978-1-938027-36-9 DEDICATION Once more for Teresa The be and end of it all A Journey of Ten Thousand Years Begins with a Single Day (Forever Tandem) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 Borders—Open Borders and Closing Threats .......................................... 12 Chapter 2 Unsettled Boundaries—That Not Yet Settled Border ................................ 24 Chapter 3 Arctic Sovereignty—Arctic Antics ............................................................. 45 Chapter 4 Immigrants and Refugees .........................................................................54 Chapter 5 Crime and (Lack of) Punishment .............................................................. 78 Chapter 6 Human Rights and Wrongs .................................................................... 102 Chapter 7 Language and Discord ..........................................................................
  • The Media's Use of Lesbian Stereotypes

    The Media's Use of Lesbian Stereotypes

    Canadian Political Science Review 3(3) September 2009 Changing the Game Changes the Frame: The Media’s Use of Lesbian Stereotypes in Leadership versus Election Campaigns Joanna M. Everitt (University of New Brunswick – St. John) and Michael Camp (St. Thomas University)1 Abstract This study uses content analysis and interviews to examine how the media reported the candidacy and campaign of Allison Brewer, the openly lesbian leader of the New Brunswick New Democratic Party. The “news values” that govern political reporting led the media to construct Brewer’s political persona during her leadership campaign using stereotypes of lesbians, activists and women in politics. This stereotypic treatment occurred at a point in her political career when impressions are most important. A year later, during the provincial election campaign her newsworthiness as a “new” or a “contentious” presence in politics had diminished, but had not completely disappeared. Introduction In September 2005 Allison Brewer was elected leader of the New Brunswick New Democratic Party (NDP). While she ran on a platform emphasizinG health care, education, the environment and increased support for social workers (Brewer interview 2006) what cauGht the media’s attention was her personal identity as an out lesbian. Despite the fact that her tenure on the political stage was not long (she stepped down in the fall of 2006 after losinG in the September provincial election), her experiences with the media durinG both the leadership campaign and the general election are of academic interest as they allow us to examine how the media cover relatively unknown political fiGures who happen to be homosexual.
  • False Dilemma Wikipedia Contents

    False Dilemma Wikipedia Contents

    False dilemma Wikipedia Contents 1 False dilemma 1 1.1 Examples ............................................... 1 1.1.1 Morton's fork ......................................... 1 1.1.2 False choice .......................................... 2 1.1.3 Black-and-white thinking ................................... 2 1.2 See also ................................................ 2 1.3 References ............................................... 3 1.4 External links ............................................. 3 2 Affirmative action 4 2.1 Origins ................................................. 4 2.2 Women ................................................ 4 2.3 Quotas ................................................. 5 2.4 National approaches .......................................... 5 2.4.1 Africa ............................................ 5 2.4.2 Asia .............................................. 7 2.4.3 Europe ............................................ 8 2.4.4 North America ........................................ 10 2.4.5 Oceania ............................................ 11 2.4.6 South America ........................................ 11 2.5 International organizations ...................................... 11 2.5.1 United Nations ........................................ 12 2.6 Support ................................................ 12 2.6.1 Polls .............................................. 12 2.7 Criticism ............................................... 12 2.7.1 Mismatching ......................................... 13 2.8 See also
  • Powerstream Merger a 'Financially Compelling' Deal: Bevilacqua Vaughan Mayor Pleased with Markham Vote

    Powerstream Merger a 'Financially Compelling' Deal: Bevilacqua Vaughan Mayor Pleased with Markham Vote

    PowerStream merger a 'financially compelling' deal: Bevilacqua Vaughan mayor pleased with Markham vote Vaughan Citizen By Adam Martin-Robbins The merger of PowerStream with two other municipally owned electricity distribution firms is surging ahead and Vaughan Mayor Maurizio Bevilacqua is pretty charged up about it. “This deal is financially compelling both from a shareholder perspective and from a customer perspective,” said Bevilacqua, who serves as chair of PowerStream’s board of directors and has been a vocal proponent of the merger. “All-in-all, this deal makes sense for the citizens of Vaughan.” The proposed merger cleared a major hurdle last week when a deeply divided Markham council, which along with Vaughan and Barrie jointly owns PowerStream, narrowly voted in favour of the merger plan. That plan will see PowerStream join Mississauga’s Enersource Corporation and Horizon Utilities Corporation, owned by Hamilton and St. Catharines. They will then purchase Hydro One Brampton from the province for $607 million and bring it into the fold to create Ontario’s second largest electricity distribution company with nearly one million customers. The merged energy company expects to realize significant “synergies” resulting in projected savings for local residential customers on distribution charges of between $40 and $50, averaged out over 25 years, according to PowerStream officials. Local businesses and institutions, including the City of Vaughan, are also expected to save thousands on their hydro bills. For example, the average industrial customer is projected to save about $26,000 annually on the distribution portion of their hydro bill. Whether or not customers’ overall hydro bill will go down depends on what happens with electricity rates, set by the Ontario Energy Board, but lower distribution charges would help offset any rate increase.
  • Debates of the Senate

    Debates of the Senate

    Debates of the Senate 1st SESSION . 42nd PARLIAMENT . VOLUME 150 . NUMBER 52 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, June 17, 2016 The Honourable GEORGE J. FUREY Speaker CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue). Debates Services: D'Arcy McPherson, National Press Building, Room 906, Tel. 613-995-5756 Publications Centre: Kim Laughren, National Press Building, Room 926, Tel. 613-947-0609 Published by the Senate Available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1207 THE SENATE Friday, June 17, 2016 The Senate met at 9 a.m., the Speaker in the chair. quarantine of Iranian society so that they may more firmly hold it in their grip. Prayers. Honourable senators, newspaper reports suggest that our federal government is ``actively engaged'' in this case and SENATORS' STATEMENTS working closely with allies to assist Homa Hoodfar. It is my hope that their efforts to free both Saeed Malekpour and Homa Hoodfar from the malign and criminal Iranian regime IRAN will be successful. DETENTION OF HOMA HOODFAR In the meantime, I know that all honourable senators will continue to follow their cases with deep concern as we continue to Hon. Linda Frum: Honourable senators, as I rise today, I note condemn the brutal regime that has seen fit to take them hostage. that it has been almost exactly one month to this day since the Senate of Canada conducted its inquiry into the plight of innocently detained political prisoners in Iran. Today, I wish to remind us all that holding Iran accountable for PAUL G. KITCHEN its flagrant abuses of human rights cannot solely take place during a two-day inquiry, or even an annual Iran Accountability Week; it ROTHESAY NETHERWOOD SCHOOL— must take place every single day, because, sadly, there is great CONGRATULATIONS ON RETIREMENT cause for vigilance on this matter.
  • The Subject-Matter of Those Elements Contained in Part 5 of Bill C-74

    The Subject-Matter of Those Elements Contained in Part 5 of Bill C-74

    MAY 2018 THE SUBJECT-MATTER OF THOSE ELEMENTS CONTAINED IN PART 5 OF BILL C-74: AN ACT TO IMPLEMENT CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE BUDGET TABLED IN PARLIAMENT ON FEBRUARY 27, 2018 AND OTHER MEASURES Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources The Honourable Rosa Galvez, Chair The Honourable Michael L. MacDonald, Deputy Chair For more information please contact us: by email: [email protected] by mail: The Standing Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources Senate, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0A4 This report can be downloaded at: www.senate-senat.ca/enev The Senate is on Twitter: @SenateCA, follow the committee using the hashtag #ENEV Ce rapport est également offert en français THE SUBJECT-MATTER OF THOSE ELEMENTS CONTAINED IN PART 5 OF BILL C-74 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP ................................................................... 5 ORDER OF REFERENCE .............................................................................. 6 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................ 9 THE GREENHOUSE GAS POLLUTION PRICING ACT: DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................... 9 GENERAL DISCUSSION FROM WITNESSES ................................................ 12 A. Carbon Pricing as an Economic Instrument ...................................... 12 B. Competitiveness ..........................................................................
  • CAWS NEWS Oct 09.Indd

    CAWS NEWS Oct 09.Indd

    F A L L N E W S L E T T E R 2 0 0 9 Conference a Success ello to all of you I met this past August at the on what was best for Sheena. We attended a WS CAWS conference and Hello to those of you I conference in the US about a year after receiving the Hhaven’t met yet but hope to meet over time. diagnosis which put us on the journey that we have As the incoming President for CAWS I would like been on ever since that conference. It was important share a bit about myself and my family. I have been to have expectations of not just Sheena but of the married to Fraser for 35 years and we have 4 wonder- supports that we wrapped around her. We became very ful grown up children and 5 grandchildren. proactive and worked hard at ensuring Sheena had an This past June I was elected as inclusive education as well as an inclusive community the CAWS President and what an honor to hold this life. position at this time when so much work has been Sheena attended school and was done to heighten the awareness of Williams Syndrome included from Kindergarten to Grade 12 inclusive. She in Canada. The “National CAWS Awareness Week” graduated from school with a diploma and followed will go a long way to create awareness across Canada. through on her dream to own a candy store. Sheena We owe a debt of gratitude to MP Bill Siksay for opened “Sheena’s Sweets and Such” for business in furthering our request and managing to have it tabled September of the same year (4 years ago now).