DOCSLIB.ORG

What to Do About Question Period: a Roundtable

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What to Do About Question Period: a Roundtable What to do about Question Period: A Roundtable Michael Chong, MP; Marlene Jennings, MP; Mario Laframboise, MP; Libby Davies, MP; Tom Lukiwski, MP On May 7, 2010 a motion calling for the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs to recommend changes to the Standing Orders and other conventions governing Oral Questions was introduced by the member for Wellington–Halton Hills. Among other things the Committee would consider ways of (i) elevating decorum and fortifying the use of discipline by the Speaker, to strengthen the dignity and authority of the House, (ii) lengthening the amount of time given for each question and each answer, (iii) examining the convention that the Minister questioned need not respond, (iv) allocating half the questions each day for Members, whose names and order of recognition would be randomly selected, (v) dedicating Wednesday exclusively for questions to the Prime Minister, (vi) dedicating Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday for questions to Ministers other than the Prime Minister in a way that would require Ministers be present two of the four days to answer questions concerning their portfolio, based on a published schedule that would rotate and that would ensure an equitable distribution of Ministers across the four days. The motion was debated on May 27, 2010. The following extracts are taken from that debate. Michal Chong (Conservative, Wel- Since this motion was made public, I have received lington–Halton Hills): Canadians phone calls, letters and emails from citizens across know that something is not quite right this country. From Kingston, a proud member of the with their democratic institutions. Canadian military wrote me: They may not know exactly what pro- I have served in the Canadian Forces for over cesses, procedures and rules need to 24 years and the lack of civility in the House be changed but they know their insti- of Commons has been an occasional topic of tutions need to be fixed and they want conversation throughout the years. I’ve often them to be reformed. thought it extremely ironic that my elected political leaders could sometimes be so immature We need to respond to these concerns and we need and exhibit such appalling behaviour when my to reform Parliament. Parliamentary reform begins fellow soldiers, sailors and airmen are required to uphold such high standards of deportment with the reform of question period. If the heart of our both in and out of uniform. democracy is Parliament, then the heart of Parliament is question period, the 45 minute period each day This concern has also been voiced to me by school where members of Parliament ask questions of the teachers, truck drivers, grade five students and government in order to hold it to account. Question boardroom executives. In fact, teachers have told me period is televised and each day its proceedings are that the level of behaviour in question period is such relayed by the national media to millions of Canadians. that they will not take their classes here anymore. This is the surest sign that question period needs to be If one thing has been made abundantly clear to reformed. me as a member of Parliament for the last number of years and to all of us in this House, it is that More than four out of ten Canadians refused to vote ordinary Canadians are disappointed with the level in the last election. This is a sign that our Parliament of behaviour in question period and they want their needs to be reformed. Question period has become parliamentarians to focus on the issues that really more about scoring cheap political points rather than matter to them. about the issues that really matter to Canadians. 2 CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW/AUTUMN 2010 Question period has become more about scoring extending the question and answer time made cheap political points rather than dealing with the for more substantive exchanges. issues that really matter to Canadians. The third proposal contained in the motion calls Question period has become a time where behaviour on the committee to re-examine the convention that is not permitted in any boardroom, dining room, that a minister need not respond to the questioner. or classroom regularly occurs here in the people’s Sometimes I understand it is not possible for a minister room. As a result, there is a growing divide between to respond, as they are out of the country in carrying Canadians who are becoming more and more apolitical out their duties representing Canada abroad. Other and a Parliament that is becoming more and more times the problem is that the 35-second rule results in partisan. questions that are rhetorical and answers that become rhetorical, and the government, for good reasons, We, as members of Parliament, need to bridge chooses to designate a particular minister to respond that gap by reforming Parliament and regaining to those rhetorical questions. the respect of Canadians. That is why today I move Motion No. 517, a proposal to reform question period. Thus, if we are going to overhaul question period, It contains six specific proposals to address question if we are going to have more substantive questions period and make it focus on the issues that really and more substantive answers, then we should also matter to Canadians. examine the convention that a minister need not respond. First, the motion calls for the elevation of decorum and the strengthening of the authority of the Speaker. Fourth, I am proposing in the motion to allocate half the questions per day to backbench members of From teachers with students on class trips to boardroom Parliament. Currently, in question period, members executives, Canadians want behaviour in question period of Parliament may only ask questions in the House if improved. The current behaviour is unacceptable in any they receive the prior approval of their House leader social setting, let alone this country’s Parliament. Pleas and party whips. This, in my view, is a denial of the for better decorum are insufficient. We, as members of right of the backbench members of Parliament to Parliament, need to give a mandate to the Speaker of this represent their constituents and to ask questions of the House to enforce the rules already in the Standing Orders government in relation to their constituencies. and in current convention. The introduction of the approval of the House The second proposal is to lengthen the time given to leader and the whip for a member to ask a question in ask a question and the time given to answer a question. question period in all parties is a recent practice. It is Currently, 35 seconds are allocated to the questioner and not something that was present here before the 1990s. 35 seconds to the answerer. It is an insufficient amount In fact, I was speaking with a former parliamentarian of time. As a result, we get rhetorical questions and who sat in this House for over 20 years in the 1970s rhetorical answers. and 1980s. He told me that he was shocked to find out The lengthening of time given to ask and to answer a that the Speaker no longer recognized members in question is something that was done here at one point in the House spontaneously during question period. In time. The short 35-second rule is a recent introduction fact, he told me that up until his time in Parliament, to this Parliament. For decades, parliamentarians had the first two or three rounds in question period went a minute to a minute and a half to ask a question, and to the leaders and their designates. After that, it was ministers had a minute to a minute and a half to respond backbench members of Parliament who could catch the to questions. Lengthening the amount of time given to eye of the Speaker and rise and ask questions that were ask and to answer questions will lead to more substantive of concern to their constituents. We need to go back to questions and more substantive answers. some sort of system like that in order to strengthen the role of this legislature. Writing in the National Post, Tasha Kheiridd opined that: Speaking on The Sunday Edition with Michael Enright on our nation’s public broadcaster, former New the current 35-second format may produce tailor-made soundbites for the evening news, Democrat leader and respected parliamentarian Ed but hardly allows for depth or reflection. Broadbent said, “We still have to make changes to magnify the role of individual MPs”. He added, “It is She added that the motion: up to individual MPs to assert themselves and to assert is supported by research done on Western their democratic rights”. European Parliaments where it was found that CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW/AUTUMN 2010 3 The final two proposals contained in my motion We are quite pleased that the member for Wellington– would dedicate specific days for the Prime Minister Halton Hills has confirmed to the House that he is open and other ministers of the Crown to attend question to suggestion and changes. He wants his motion to be period. Presently, preparing for question period adopted in the House and referred to the Standing requires almost four hours a day per minister. There Committee on Procedure and House Affairs. He also are roughly forty ministers of the Crown in the wants members of this committee, of which I am one, government. Each minister spends four hours a day to do a comprehensive study in order to improve the either in question period or preparing for it. That is not content and the form of question period.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PRISM::Advent3b2 8.25
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 39th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION 39e LÉGISLATURE, 1re SESSION Journals Journaux No. 1 No 1 Monday, April 3, 2006 Le lundi 3 avril 2006 11:00 a.m. 11 heures Today being the first day of the meeting of the First Session of Le Parlement se réunit aujourd'hui pour la première fois de la the 39th Parliament for the dispatch of business, Ms. Audrey première session de la 39e législature, pour l'expédition des O'Brien, Clerk of the House of Commons, Mr. Marc Bosc, Deputy affaires. Mme Audrey O'Brien, greffière de la Chambre des Clerk of the House of Commons, Mr. R. R. Walsh, Law Clerk and communes, M. Marc Bosc, sous-greffier de la Chambre des Parliamentary Counsel of the House of Commons, and Ms. Marie- communes, M. R. R. Walsh, légiste et conseiller parlementaire de Andrée Lajoie, Clerk Assistant of the House of Commons, la Chambre des communes, et Mme Marie-Andrée Lajoie, greffier Commissioners appointed per dedimus potestatem for the adjoint de la Chambre des communes, commissaires nommés en purpose of administering the oath to Members of the House of vertu d'une ordonnance, dedimus potestatem, pour faire prêter Commons, attending according to their duty, Ms. Audrey O'Brien serment aux députés de la Chambre des communes, sont présents laid upon the Table a list of the Members returned to serve in this dans l'exercice de leurs fonctions. Mme Audrey O'Brien dépose sur Parliament received by her as Clerk of the House of Commons le Bureau la liste des députés qui ont été proclamés élus au from and certified under the hand of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..24 Committee
    House of Commons CANADA Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs PROC Ï NUMBER 013 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 39th PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE Thursday, January 31, 2008 Chair Mr. Gary Goodyear Also available on the Parliament of Canada Web Site at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1 Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs Thursday, January 31, 2008 Ï (1105) equal representation, which further compounds the problem, in my [English] view. The Chair (Mr. Gary Goodyear (Cambridge, CPC)): I That notwithstanding, it does appear that the steering committee recognize you, Mr. Lukiwski. has determined, in its infinite wisdom, that legislation is not a priority for this committee, that they wish to discuss Madam Let me welcome everybody back after the holidays. I hope you all Redman's motion. had a productive time in your ridings. On behalf of, I'm sure, other members of the committee, I wish all of you a very happy, With that in mind, I have a motion, Chair. I apologize, because it prosperous, and safe new year. was rather hastily written and it's handwritten, because it just occurred in the last few moments. But I'd like to read it. It's only in Colleagues, this morning I want to present the steering English, not in both official languages. I assume the clerk will be committee's report. The steering committee met earlier this week able to get the correct translation. I would like to read it into the and drafted the second report of the subcommittee on agenda and record. procedure of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Gazette, Part I
    EXTRA Vol. 153, No. 12 ÉDITION SPÉCIALE Vol. 153, no 12 Canada Gazette Gazette du Canada Part I Partie I OTTAWA, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2019 OTTAWA, LE JEUDI 14 NOVEMBRE 2019 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER BUREAU DU DIRECTEUR GÉNÉRAL DES ÉLECTIONS CANADA ELECTIONS ACT LOI ÉLECTORALE DU CANADA Return of Members elected at the 43rd general Rapport de député(e)s élu(e)s à la 43e élection election générale Notice is hereby given, pursuant to section 317 of the Can- Avis est par les présentes donné, conformément à l’ar- ada Elections Act, that returns, in the following order, ticle 317 de la Loi électorale du Canada, que les rapports, have been received of the election of Members to serve in dans l’ordre ci-dessous, ont été reçus relativement à l’élec- the House of Commons of Canada for the following elec- tion de député(e)s à la Chambre des communes du Canada toral districts: pour les circonscriptions ci-après mentionnées : Electoral District Member Circonscription Député(e) Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Matapédia Kristina Michaud Matapédia Kristina Michaud La Prairie Alain Therrien La Prairie Alain Therrien LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Burnaby South Jagmeet Singh Burnaby-Sud Jagmeet Singh Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke Randall Garrison Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke
    [Show full text]
  • Hope in Shadows
    HOPE IN SHADOWS Residents of Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside are not bound by poverty or addiction but rather driven by a sense of community, kinship, and above all, hope. For each of the past five years, Pivot Legal Society’s annual Hope in Shadows photography contest has empowered residents of hood. Working with this archive, Brad Cran Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside by providing and Gillian Jerome have collected the personal Cran / Jerome ARSENAL PULP PRESS | PIVOT LEGAL SOCIETY them with 200 disposable cameras to docu- stories behind these stunning photographs. ment their lives—thus giving them an artistic In surprising and astounding ways, Hope means to enter the ongoing and often stormy in Shadows will not only change the way you dialogue over the place they call home. Since think about the Downtown Eastside and other the contest’s inception, DTES residents have impoverished neighbourhoods; it will also taken over 20,000 images of their neighbour- change your view of society as we know it. Includes a foreword by Libby Davies, Member of Parliament for Vancouver East. Brad Cran is a poet, essayist, and photogra- They are contributing editors at Geist Maga- pher. Gillian Jerome is a poet and teaches in zine and live in East Vancouver with their the English Department at the University of daughters Rory and Micah-Sophia. British Columbia. Author royalties and partial proceeds for the sale of this book are donated to Pivot Legal Society. ARSENAL PULP PRESS | PIVOT LEGAL SOCIETY ISBN 978-1-55152-238-8 Social Issues / Photography $19.95 US & Canada HOPE IN SHADOWS HOPE 6GH:C6AEJAEEG:HHE>KDIA:<6AHD8>:IN IN SHADOWS Stories and Photographs of Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside brad cran and gillian jerome With a foreword by Libby Davies HOPE IN SHADOWS Copyright © 2008 by Pivot Legal Society, Brad Cran and Gillian Jerome Foreword and Introduction copyright © 2008 by the authors Second printing: 2008 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Mps on the Hill Names Political Affiliation Constituency
    List of MPs on the Hill Names Political Affiliation Constituency Adam Vaughan Liberal Spadina – Fort York, ON Alaina Lockhart Liberal Fundy Royal, NB Ali Ehsassi Liberal Willowdale, ON Alistair MacGregor NDP Cowichan – Malahat – Langford, BC Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, BC Arnold Viersen Conservative Peace River – Westlock, AB Bill Casey Liberal Cumberland Colchester, NS Bob Benzen Conservative Calgary Heritage, AB Bob Zimmer Conservative Prince George – Peace River – Northern Rockies, BC Carol Hughes NDP Algoma – Manitoulin – Kapuskasing, ON Cathay Wagantall Conservative Yorkton – Melville, SK Cathy McLeod Conservative Kamloops – Thompson – Cariboo, BC Celina Ceasar-Chavannes Liberal Whitby, ON Cheryl Gallant Conservative Renfrew – Nipissing – Pembroke, ON Chris Bittle Liberal St. Catharines, ON Christine Moore NDP Abitibi – Témiscamingue, QC Dan Ruimy Liberal Pitt Meadows – Maple Ridge, BC Dan Van Kesteren Conservative Chatham-Kent – Leamington, ON Dan Vandal Liberal Saint Boniface – Saint Vital, MB Daniel Blaikie NDP Elmwood – Transcona, MB Darrell Samson Liberal Sackville – Preston – Chezzetcook, NS Darren Fisher Liberal Darthmouth – Cole Harbour, NS David Anderson Conservative Cypress Hills – Grasslands, SK David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON David Graham Liberal Laurentides – Labelle, QC David Sweet Conservative Flamborough – Glanbrook, ON David Tilson Conservative Dufferin – Caledon, ON David Yurdiga Conservative Fort McMurray – Cold Lake, AB Deborah Schulte Liberal King – Vaughan, ON Earl Dreeshen Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • Complementarity: the Constitutional Role of the Senate of Canada
    SENATE SENAT The Honourable V. Peter Harder P.C. L’honorable V. Peter Harder C.P. Government Representative in the Senate Représentant du gouvernement au Sénat CANADA Complementarity: The Constitutional Role of the Senate of Canada April 12, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 2 A. Complement to the House: A Constitutional Role Rooted in the 7 Appointive Principle B. In the Senate, Self-Restraint is the Constitutional Watchword 11 C. The Senate’s Power to Amend, Legislate and Influence Public Policy 17 D. We “Ping”, But We Generally Ought not “Pong” 28 E. A Prudent Yet Vigilant Approach to Fiscal and Budgetary Initiatives 30 i. Restricted Access to the Purse Strings 30 ii. A Tradition of Vigilance and Self-Restraint on Confidence and 31 Budgetary Matters iii. The Omnibus Caveats 33 F. The Senate Extraordinary and Rarely Used Power to Defeat 37 Government Legislation G. Democratic Deference to the Government’s Election Platform 41 H. Private Members’ Bills and the Senate’s “Pocket” Veto 47 Epilogue: Better Serving Canadians 49 Complementarity: The Constitutional Role of the Senate of Canada April 2018 - Page 1 of 51 INTRODUCTION “If we enact legislation speedily, we are called rubber stamps. If we exercise the constitutional authority which the Senate possesses under the British North America Act, we are told that we are doing something that we have no right to do. I do not know how to satisfy our critics.” The late former Senator Carl Goldenberg, Senate Debates of January 11, 1974 Many senators are working hard to close a credibility gap that was created by many difficult years and prove the Senate’s public value as an appointed upper chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..36 Committee
    Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs PROC Ï NUMBER 058 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE Tuesday, November 25, 2014 Chair Mr. Joe Preston 1 Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs Tuesday, November 25, 2014 Ï (1110) with the Westminster system, which may be of interest to the [English] committee in terms of thinking about the issues if you do go ahead The Chair (Mr. Joe Preston (Elgin—Middlesex—London, and implement an e-petition system. CPC)): We'll call the meeting to order. We're here pursuant to the The Chair: Thank you. order of reference of Wednesday, January 29, the study of motion M- 428 on electronic petitions. Is that report available to us electronically? Can we pick it up We have two guests with us today. First is Ms. Hilderman from someplace? Samara. Great to have you with us today. Dr. Ruth Fox: Yes, I can certainly send a copy. It's available via Second is Dr. Fox. Can you hear us? our website for free download. That's possible. Dr. Ruth Fox (Director and Head of Research, Hansard Society): Yes, I can. The Chair: Great. We'll make sure we get that done, then. The Chair: Great. We're going to get started. Thank you very much. We're going to give each of you a bit of an opening statement. Then the members around the table will ask you questions. We'll move to Ms. Hilderman, then, on your opening statement. I think we'll start with you, Dr. Fox. I like to do that with the Then we'll move to questions by members.
    [Show full text]
  • New NDP Vs. Classic NDP: Is a Synthesis Possible, and Does It Matter? Tom Langford
    Labour / Le Travail ISSUE 85 (2020) ISSN: 1911-4842 REVIEW ESSAY / NOTE CRITIQUE New NDP vs. Classic NDP: Is a Synthesis Possible, and Does It Matter? Tom Langford David McGrane, The New NDP: Moderation, Modernization, and Political Marketing (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2019) Roberta Lexier, Stephanie Bangarth & Jon Weier, eds., Party of Conscience: The CCF, the NDP, and Social Democracy in Canada (Toronto: Between the Lines, 2018) Did you know that after Jack Layton took over as its leader in 2003, the federal New Democratic Party became as committed to the generation and dissemination of opposition research, or “oppo research,” as its major rivals in the federal party system? Indeed, the ndp takes the prize for being “the first federal party to set up stand alone websites specifically to attack opponents, now a common practice.”1 The ndp’s continuing embrace of “oppo research” as a means of challenging the credibility of its political rivals was on display during the final days of the 2019 federal election campaign. Facing a strong challenge from Green Party candidates in ridings in the southern part of Vancouver Island, the ndp circulated a flyer that attacked the Green Party for purportedly sharing “many Conservative values,” including being willing to “cut services [that] families need” and to fall short of “always defend[ing] the right to access a safe abortion.” Needless to say, the ndp’s claims were based on a very slanted interpretation of the evidence pulled together by its researchers 1. David McGrane, The New ndp: Moderation, Modernization, and Political Marketing (Vancouver: ubc Press, 2019), 98.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to Canadians
    THE HOUSE OF COMMONS Report to Canadians 2006 ISBN: 0-662-43408-0 COVER PHOTO: © LIBRARY OF PARLIAMENT/MONE PHOTOGRAPHY CATALOGUE NO.: X9-27/2006E-PDF INSIDE COVER PHOTO: © LIBRARY OF PARLIAMENT/MONE PHOTOGRAPHY TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from the Speaker I Welcome to the House of Commons 1 The Work of a Member of Parliament 1 Party Membership in the House of Commons 2 A Closer Look at Members of Parliament 4 At Work in the Chamber 5 Maintaining Order in the House 5 Creating Canada’s Laws 5 Maintaining Responsible Government 7 Tabling Documents 9 Establishing the Rules for the Chamber 9 Committees: Examining Bills and Issues in Depth 11 Determining Committee Membership 11 Subjects Under Study 12 Committee Connections 13 Making a Difference 14 Serving their Constituents 14 Presenting Petitions in the House of Commons 14 Bringing Parliament to Canadians 15 Information for Members and the Public 15 On the International Scene 16 Receiving International Visitors 16 Promoting Canada’s Interests Abroad 17 Hosting Conferences 17 Behind the Scenes: The House of Commons Administration 18 Supporting Members of Parliament 18 Strategic Objectives 18 In Conclusion 28 Financial Report 29 Members of the House of Commons www.parl.gc.ca Approved by the Board of Internal Economy LETTER FROM THE SPEAKER As Speaker of the House of Commons, I am very pleased to present the Report to Canadians 2006, which highlights the work of Members of the House of Commons, and the activities of the House Administration in support of Members and the institution. The past year was a time of adaptation and change for the House of Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 098 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 13, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 13, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. Parliament on February 23, 2005, and Bill C-48, an act to authorize the Minister of Finance to make certain payments, shall be disposed of as follows: 1. Any division thereon requested before the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, shall be deferred to that time; Prayers 2. At the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, all questions necessary for the disposal of the second reading stage of (1) Bill C-43 and (2) Bill C-48 shall be put and decided forthwith and successively, Ï (1000) without further debate, amendment or deferral. [English] Ï (1010) MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The Speaker: Does the hon. government House leader have the The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a unanimous consent of the House for this motion? message has been received from the Senate informing this House Some hon. members: Agreed. that the Senate has passed certain bills, to which the concurrence of this House is desired. Some hon. members: No. Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Parliamentary Guide
    NUNC COGNOSCO EX PARTE THOMAS J. BATA LI BRARY TRENT UNIVERSITY us*<•-« m*.•• ■Jt ,.v<4■■ L V ?' V t - ji: '^gj r ", •W* ~ %- A V- v v; _ •S I- - j*. v \jrfK'V' V ■' * ' ’ ' • ’ ,;i- % »v • > ». --■ : * *S~ ' iJM ' ' ~ : .*H V V* ,-l *» %■? BE ! Ji®». ' »- ■ •:?■, M •* ^ a* r • * «'•# ^ fc -: fs , I v ., V', ■ s> f ** - l' %% .- . **» f-•" . ^ t « , -v ' *$W ...*>v■; « '.3* , c - ■ : \, , ?>?>*)■#! ^ - ••• . ". y(.J, ■- : V.r 4i .» ^ -A*.5- m “ * a vv> w* W,3^. | -**■ , • * * v v'*- ■ ■ !\ . •* 4fr > ,S<P As 5 - _A 4M ,' € - ! „■:' V, ' ' ?**■- i.." ft 1 • X- \ A M .-V O' A ■v ; ■ P \k trf* > i iwr ^.. i - "M - . v •?*»-• -£-. , v 4’ >j- . *•. , V j,r i 'V - • v *? ■ •.,, ;<0 / ^ . ■'■ ■ ,;• v ,< */ ■" /1 ■* * *-+ ijf . ^--v- % 'v-a <&, A * , % -*£, - ^-S*.' J >* •> *' m' . -S' ?v * ... ‘ *•*. * V .■1 *-.«,»'• ■ 1**4. * r- * r J-' ; • * “ »- *' ;> • * arr ■ v * v- > A '* f ' & w, HSi.-V‘ - .'">4-., '4 -' */ ' -',4 - %;. '* JS- •-*. - -4, r ; •'ii - ■.> ¥?<* K V' V ;' v ••: # * r * \'. V-*, >. • s s •*•’ . “ i"*■% * % «. V-- v '*7. : '""•' V v *rs -*• * * 3«f ' <1k% ’fc. s' ^ * ' .W? ,>• ■ V- £ •- .' . $r. « • ,/ ••<*' . ; > -., r;- •■ •',S B. ' F *. ^ , »» v> ' ' •' ' a *' >, f'- \ r ■* * is #* ■ .. n 'K ^ XV 3TVX’ ■■i ■% t'' ■ T-. / .a- ■ '£■ a« .v * tB• f ; a' a :-w;' 1 M! : J • V ^ ’ •' ■ S ii 4 » 4^4•M v vnU :^3£'" ^ v .’'A It/-''-- V. - ;ii. : . - 4 '. ■ ti *%?'% fc ' i * ■ , fc ' THE CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY GUIDE AND WORK OF GENERAL REFERENCE I9OI FOR CANADA, THE PROVINCES, AND NORTHWEST TERRITORIES (Published with the Patronage of The Parliament of Canada) Containing Election Returns, Eists and Sketches of Members, Cabinets of the U.K., U.S., and Canada, Governments and Eegisla- TURES OF ALL THE PROVINCES, Census Returns, Etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..36 Committee (PRISM::Advent3b2 9.00)
    House of Commons CANADA Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs PROC Ï NUMBER 003 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 39th PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE Tuesday, November 13, 2007 Chair Mr. Gary Goodyear Also available on the Parliament of Canada Web Site at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1 Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs Tuesday, November 13, 2007 Ï (1110) stay in public and keep this room. I decided pretty much based on [English] the costs of doing the televising, but I'm completely open to changing that. It was a judgment call on my part, given that we The Chair (Mr. Gary Goodyear (Cambridge, CPC)): Ladies would be moving to legislation, but I'm completely open to making a and gentlemen, let's call the meeting to order. change. Welcome back. I hope everybody had a productive and good weekend of remembrance. Are there any other comments on that? Are there any objections to televising? Colleagues, I want to remind members that we are in the larger room today because members did feel we would need to room for Madam Redman, please. staff and so on with respect to the carrying on of the Liberal motion Hon. Karen Redman: That being said, I have no problem with for study. continuing on and becoming televised at whatever point that seems I want to bring to the attention of the members that it is the usual reasonable. practice of this committee to have our meetings in public; however, The Chair: Is that okay with members of the committee? today's meeting is not being televised.
    [Show full text]