DOCSLIB.ORG

2017 – Promises and Reality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2017 – Promises and Reality Citizens’ Report on Third year of the NDA Government -2017 Promises & Reality Civil Society Initiative Coordinated by Wada Na Todo Abhiyan 01 ABOUT WADA NA TODO ABHIYAN Wada Na Todo Abhiyan (WNTA) is a national campaign focused on Governance Accountability to hold the government accountable for its promise to end Poverty, Social Exclusion & Discrimination. WNTA emerged from the consensus among human rights activists and social action groups who were part of the World Social Forum 2004 (Mumbai). The purpose was to create an environment through focused and concerted effort and try to make a difference in India where one-fourth of the world’s poor live and experience intense deprivation from opportunities to learn, live and work with dignity. In this regard, WNTA highlights the aspirations and concerns of the most marginalized sections of the society – Dalits, Adivasis, Nomadic Tribes, Minorities, Women, Sexual Minorities, Children, Youth and the Person with disability to the government through People’s Manifestoes before elections. Further, WNTA reviews and monitors the performance of the government on its promises and plans towards the marginalized sections on the framework of Constitutional mandates, National development goals and International commitments set in the UN Millennium Declaration (2000) / The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals. We work to ensure that the concerns and aspirations of the marginalized sections are mainstreamed across programs, policies and development goals of the central and state governments. Contact: Wada Na Todo Abhiyan C-1/E, IInd Floor, Green Park EXt. New Delhi - 110016. Ph: 011-46082371 Email: [email protected] Citizens’ Review of Third year of the NDA Government -2017 Promises & Reality Civil Society Initiative Coordinated by: Wada Na Todo Abhiyan Editor: Sonalika Sinha Consulting Editor: Annie Namala, Thomas Pallithanam, A. K. Singh, Amitabh Behar and Paul Divakar. Coordinators John Animesh Gomes and Abdul Rauf Printed on: May 24, 2017 Design and printing: Aspire Design | www.aspiredesign.in ii Foreword Citizens Report on 3nd Year of the NDA Government - 2017: Promises & Reality’ is a Civil Society initiative reviewing government promises and performance with special focus on the elimination of poverty, discrimination and social exclusion. Wada Na Todo Abhiyan (WNTA) anchored the process with contribution from eminent citizens. The basis of the assessment is Con- stitutional mandates, electoral promises made by the government and the national development goals. The Annual Citizens Review provides a broad report on the government’s performance to citizens’ concerns. WNTA is a large civil society platform of over 4,000 civil society organizations and individuals with its core focus on gover- nance accountability to eliminate poverty and social exclusion. An important piece of this process is the Annual Civil Society / Citizens’ Review of the Union Government and its promises to the people. WNTA anchored the first civil society review of the performance of the Union Government in 2005 of UPA I. Since then Annual Reviews have been published. Additionally, 100 days of UPA II and 9 years of UPA (I &II) was published. In the months leading up to the General Elections 2014, more than 16,00,000 citizens, from 250 parliamentary constituencies across 24 states, scripted the ‘People’s Manifesto - A National Agenda for Development, Rights, Services, Governance and Accountability’ through direct and indirect consultations. The demands, aspirations and needs of the people were shared with all political parties as inputs for their upcoming election manifestos. The Citizens Review is also civil society follow up on the Peoples’ Manifesto, 2014. The Citizens’ Review of the current NDA government was conducted on the occasion of its completion of 100 days on 1st September 2014. This was followed by the Annual Citizens’ Review at the completion of the 1st year of the NDA government on 24th May 2015. The review focused on big ticket promises and campaigns. The second year review was published on 23rd May 2016 and focused on different thematic and constituencies. As the NDA government completes the third year on 25th May 2017, this report, released on May 24th 2017, is an effort to assess the progress made on various thematic areas and constituency groups. Thematic areas include - Accountability, Bud- get, Climate Justice, Civil Society Space, Education, Environment, Food & Nutrition, Functioning of Parliament, Governance, Health, Housing & Urban Poverty, Human Rights, Labour & Employment, Land Rights, Livelihood, Peace, Security & Justice, Water & Sanitation and the constituency groups are LGBTQI, Children, Dalits, Minorities, Person with Disability, Senior Citizen/ The Elderly, Tribals, Women, and Youth. Citizens from diverse backgrounds, engagements and concerns have written these pieces. Authors include citizens working with communities at the ‘grass-root’ level and those influencing national and international policy frameworks, academics, activists, retired bureaucrats to name. Written as short pieces, they mirror the critical dimensions on the thematic area. This Citizen’s Report on the NDA third year (2016-17) provides citizens’ views on various issues of people’s concerns and national development. It holds a mirror to how people’s lives are impacted over the past year and how the nation has pro- gressed. We hope this report contributes to strengthening governance accountability towards deepening our democracy and inclusive development processes. A.K. Singh, Annie Namala, Amitabh Behar, Paul Divakar and Thomas Pallithanam Conveners Wada Na Todo Abhiyan 24th May 2017 iii iv Contents 1 Aakar Patel Human rights under attack 1 2 Aariz Mohammed People’s report card 3 3 Abhay Xaxa Between devil and deep sea: Tribal affairs in NDA 5 4 Ajaykumar V B Demonetisation and the marginalised 6 5 Ajita Tiwari Padhi Climate justice: Rhetoric and policy imperatives 7 6 Amba Salelkar The year in review for persons with disabilities 9 7 Ambarish Rai Challenges in school education and status of RTE 10 8 Amit Narkar A story of missed deadlines and failed promises 12 9 Anjali Bhardwaj The jumla of Bhrashtachar-mukt Bharat 14 10 Ashok Row Kavi Failures and hopes 15 11 Bhanwar Meghwanshi Marginalised sections pushed further to edge 17 12 Bidisha Pillai Let’s keep our promise to our children 18 13 C P Chandrasekhar Focus on hype 20 14 Dipa Sinha Right to Food gone wrong 21 15 Dr Arun Gupta Conflicts of Interest in public policy 22 16 Dr Deepak S Nikarthil & Dyuti Marginalised by government, too 24 17 Dr Harsh Dobhal Reforms in NHRC crucial now 26 18 Dr indu prakash singh & Fumbling attempts at providing ‘Housing for All’ 27 Anil Kumar 19 Dr Palla Trinadha Rao Adivasis wronged 30 20 Dr Pam Rajput Constituency Women 32 21 Dr Sajjad Hassan Governance mantra a washout 34 22 Dr Santosh Kumar Giri LGBT rights: Words, words and words 36 23 Dr Santosh Kumar Singh Parliament’s performance 37 24 E Premdas Pinto Health policies sans political will 38 25 Fahad M Khan Union Budget: Through the minority lens 40 26 Fr Koshy Thomas Leave no child behind 44 27 Gagan Sethi Goals take backseat 46 28 Harish Iyer Happy to say I’m gay 48 29 Harsh Jaitli Crisis for CSOs 49 30 Harsh Mander Jobless growth 50 31 Henri Tiphagne Right to Association: FCRA misused by government to target CSOs 52 32 John Dayal Campaign mode keeps communities cowering in fear 53 33 Kirthi Jayakumar Put women in forefront 54 34 Kurian Katticaren Civil society faultline and the emergence of right wing fundamentalism 55 v 35 M G Devasahayam Core promises forgotten 57 36 Mandeep Tiwana FCRA is an affront to civil society, democracy 59 37 Manshi Singh & Status of housing, urban poverty 61 Roshni Nuggehali 38 Martin Macwan Approaching an unproclaimed Emergency 64 39 Mathew Cherian Elderly still an ignored lot 65 40 Mathew Jacob Human rights defenders: Shrinking of democratic spaces in India 66 41 Mazher Hussain Trend at 100, Tandav at 1,000 68 42 Mridula Bajaj & Devika Singh Early childhood low on govt priority 70 43 Naresh Chandra Saxena Flaws in schemes hinder growth 72 44 Ovais Sultan Khan Three years of hatred and bigotry against Indian Muslims and Christians 73 45 P Joseph Victor Raj Child labour unaddressed 75 46 Pamela Philipose Sentinels of power choke information 76 47 Prof Janaki Rajan An eluding manifesto 78 48 Rajesh Jha NDA’s policy for higher education: Profit making business 80 49 Ramesh Sharma Land rights: An unfinished agenda 82 50 Ravi Duggal Policy paralysis continues 83 51 Ravi Duggal Sabka Saath Sabka Vikas: Mere words 85 52 Reni Jacob The reality of bonded labour 88 53 Rituparna Borah & Being LGBT in India 91 Ritambhara Mehta 54 S P Udayakumar A government not for the ordinary 93 55 Santhakumar V India’s progress likely to be slow 95 56 Santhakumar V Life of girls in Indian context 96 57 Satyendra Kumar Youth Population Dividend – Myth or Reality? 97 58 Sharad C Behar Education for Social Change 99 59 Subhash Chandra Agrawal Demonetisation poorly implemented 100 60 Trinanjan Radhakrishnan Country’s socio-cultural fabric under attack 102 61 Urmilesh Kashmir: Three years of policy paralysis 103 vi Human NDA government has rights under enabled, rather than curb violations in the attack country The year 2016 saw human rights come under sustained assault by both state and non-state actors. Impunity for human rights violations by security forces remained a major concern. The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, which grants security forces sweeping powers and virtual immunity from prosecution, continued to enable human rights violations in Jammu and Kashmir and north-eastern states. Authorities used crude colonial-era laws to silence voices of dissent. Despite several cases of racist violence and discrimination against black Africans, the Indian government refused to acknowledge the attacks as racist. Extrajudicial executions Impunity for security forces accused of extrajudicial executions continued, despite a Supreme Court ruling in July 2016 that armed forces personnel should not enjoy “blanket immunity” from trials in civilian courts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2A201600363.Pdf
    u~l (f\ 2016\cru7y 3- FIRST APPEAL UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF RTI ACT First Appellate Authority Central Information Commission 2nd floor August Kranti B ~ "~ . ..' -y-:- -....!.!.:.. "", BhlkaJI Cama Place, Ne'fllelhl-I'IJO~l:?r.: -'f"" ,,~,\ "~~ ,'''' L,:,c; ),'-:1 "<I( /,-;.(. I .. /,1/,, . -.. _..-., '"";/ . ~ "'l:Jt ..•----- ..... -: / ."";, ; Sif .•~.. rM '~'I':~',1 I-'L,' .., . " ...•--.:.:.':..:....~:-..;:.--- .. I vide my RTI petition dated 25.05.2016 sought complete information together with related file- notings/correspondence/documents on under-mentioned aspects also relating to enclosed minutes of meetings (two sets) for selection of Commissioners/Chief Commissioners at Central Information Commission: I. Complete information on some retired and/or existing Judges of High Courts and/or Supreme Court ever having applied for posts of Information Commissioner/Chief Information Commissioner at Central Information Commission ever since information may be available on record 2. Complete information on any retired and/or existing Judges of High Courts and/or , '.. I Supreme Court having been selected for posts of Information Commissioner/Chief , ...••p , it; . Information Commissioner at Central Information Commission ever'since "~l ' information may be available on record !'\lii~" V:fi: 3. Complete information on any retired and/or existing Judges of High Courts and/or ,'~t. '.. ,~~ijIc Supreme Court having been short-listed (like Mr Justice Retired Ravi R Tripathi) for posts of Information Commissioner/Chief Information Commissioner
    [Show full text]
  • Shri Sharat Sabharwal Hearing on 30.8.2016 This Matter Concerns
    Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. CIC/SH/C/2015/000049 Right to Information Act-2005-Under Section (19) Name of the Appellant : Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal, R/o: H. No- 1775, Kucha Lattushah, Dariba, Chandni Chowk, Delhi- 110006 Name of the Public : Shri Madan Chaurasia, Authority/Respondent Under Secretary, Central Public Information Officer, M/o Culture Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-110001 Information Commissioner : Shri Sharat Sabharwal Hearing on 30.8.2016 This matter concerns compliance by the Respondents with the Commission’s order No. CIC/SH/C/2015/000049 dated 25.5.2015, in which a direction was given for provision of certain information in response to the RTI application dated 10.9.2012 of the Appellant relating to his submissions ‘Ram Lila in Delhi’ made to the Union Ministry of Culture through PG portal. The Appellant wrote to the Commission on 17.8.2015, stating that the information had not been provided. After correspondence on the above issue with the Department of Art, Culture and Languages, NCT of Delhi, it was decided to hold a hearing on the compliance issue, which took place on 30.8.2016. Besides, the Appellant, the following were present on behalf of the Respondents:- (i) Shri B. S. Vashisht, Deputy Secretary, Department of Art, Culture and Languages, NCT of Delhi. (ii) Shri Madan Chaurasia, Under Secretary, Ministry of Culture. (iii) Shri Lalit Kumar Gupta, APIO, North Delhi Municipal Corporation. 1 (iv) Shri Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Naib Tehsildar, District Magistrate (Central District) Delhi. (v) Shri Sushil Tyagi, ACP/APIO, HQ (North) (vi) Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on International Religious Freedom 2006: India
    India Page 1 of 22 India International Religious Freedom Report 2006 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor The constitution provides for freedom of religion, and the Government generally respected this right in practice. However, the Government sometimes did not act swiftly enough to counter effectively societal attacks against religious minorities and attempts by some leaders of state and local governments to limit religious freedom. This resulted in part from legal constraints on national government action inherent in the country's federal structure and from shortcomings in its law enforcement and justice systems, although courts regularly upheld the constitutional provision of religious freedom. Despite Government efforts to foster communal harmony, some extremists continued to view ineffective investigation and prosecution of attacks on religious minorities, particularly at the state and local level, as a signal that they could commit such violence with impunity, although numerous cases were in the courts at the end of the reporting period. While the National Government took positive steps in key areas to improve religious freedom, the status of religious freedom generally remained the same during the period covered by this report. The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) continued to implement an inclusive and secular platform based on respect for the country's traditions of secular government and religious tolerance, and the rights of religious minorities. Terrorists attempted to provoke religious conflict by attacking Hindu Temples in Ayodhya and Varanasi. The Government reacted in a swift manner to rein in Hindu extremists, prevent revenge attacks and reprisal, and assure the Muslim community of its safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Annual Report 2005
    House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee Human Rights Annual Report 2005 First Report of Session 2005–06 HC 574 House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee Human Rights Annual Report 2005 First Report of Session 2005–06 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 15 February 2006 HC 574 Published on 23 February 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Foreign Affairs Committee The Foreign Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the administration, expenditure and policy of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and its associated agencies. Current membership Mike Gapes (Labour, Ilford South), Chairman Mr Fabian Hamilton (Labour, Leeds North East) Rt Hon Mr David Heathcoat-Amory (Conservative, Wells) Mr John Horam (Conservative, Orpington) Mr Eric Illsley (Labour, Barnsley Central) Mr Paul Keetch (Liberal Democrat, Hereford) Andrew Mackinlay (Labour, Thurrock) Mr John Maples (Conservative, Stratford-on-Avon) Sandra Osborne (Labour, Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock) Mr Greg Pope (Labour, Hyndburn) Mr Ken Purchase (Labour, Wolverhampton North East) Rt Hon Sir John Stanley (Conservative, Tonbridge and Malling) Ms Gisela Stuart (Labour, Birmingham Edgbaston) Richard Younger-Ross (Liberal Democrat, Teignbridge) The following member was also a member of the committee during the parliament. Rt Hon Mr Andrew Mackay (Conservative, Bracknell) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-42530-8 — Under Caesar's Sword Edited by Daniel Philpott , Timothy Samuel Shah Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-42530-8 — Under Caesar's Sword Edited by Daniel Philpott , Timothy Samuel Shah Index More Information Index al-Abadi, Haider, 39 African Union Mission in Somalia Abdelati, Rabie, 97 (AMISOM), 75 Abdollahi, Rasoul, 137 Ahmadinejad, Mahmoud, 136 Abducted in Iraq: A Priest in Baghdad, Ahmadis, 378, 382 37 aid neutrality, 474, 482 Abdullah (king of Saudi Arabia), 159 Aid to the Church in Need, 463, 465, 487 Abdullah, Abdul Aziz bin, 148 Aikman, David, 347, 352 Abdullah II (king of Jordan), 47 Akinola, Peter, 20 Abedini, Saeed, 140 Al-Azhar, 58 academic dialogue in Pakistan, 251 Alderstein, Yitzchok, 130 accommodation strategies Aleksei (patriarch of Moscow), 196 in China, 348, 354 Alencherry, George, 275 in Sri Lanka, 285 Aleppo, Syria, 40, 45 of Western Christians, 445 Ali, Suryadharma, 382, 384 ACCORD, 444 Alito, Samuel, 441 ACT Alliance, 465, 473 All India Catholic Union (AICU), 270 Ad Scapulam (Tertullian), 18 All India Christian Council (AICC), 270 Adaktusson, Lars, 466, 487 All Pakistan Minorities Alliance (APMA), 2, ADRA (Adventist Development and Relief 254 Agency), 185 Allen, John, 396, 421 Advisory Council of Heads of Protestant Allende, Salvador, 403 Churches of Russia, 225 Alliance Defending Freedom, 443 advocacy Alliance Defending Freedom International religious freedom advocacy by Christian (ADF), 273 TANs, 483 alliance with authoritarians, 60 in Vietnam and Laos, 324, 330 All-Union Council of Evangelical Christian- Afghanistan Baptists, 209 blasphemy, 242 Al-Monitor’s The Pulse of the Middle
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Periodic Review 2009
    UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW 2009 SAUDI ARABIA NGO: European Centre for Law and Justice 4, Quai Koch 67000 Strasbourg France RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN THE SAUDI ARABIA SECTION 1: Legal Framework I. Saudi Constitutional Provisions Saudi Arabia is an Islamic monarchy.1 The Saudi Constitution is comprised of the Koran, Sharia law, and the Basic Law.2 “Islamic law forms the basis for the country’s legal code.”3 Strict Islamic law governs,4 and as such, the Saudi Constitution does not permit religious freedom. Even the practice of Islam itself is limited to the strict, Saudi-specific interpretation of Islam.5 Importantly, the Saudi government makes essentially no distinction between religion and government.6 According to its constitution, Saudi Arabia is a monarchy with a limited Consultative Council and Council of Ministers.7 The Consultative Council is governed by the Shura Council Law, which is based on Islam,8 and serves as an advisory body that operates strictly within the traditional confines of Islamic law.9 The Council of Ministers, expressly recognized by the Basic Law,10 is authorized to “examine almost any matter in the kingdom.”11 The Basic Law was promulgated by the king in 1993 and operates somewhat like a limited “bill of rights” for Saudi citizens. Comprising a portion of the Saudi Constitution, the Basic Law broadly outlines “the government’s rights and responsibilities,” as well as the general structure of government and the general source of law (the Koran). 12 The Basic Law consists of 83 articles defining the strict, Saudi Islamic state. By declaring that Saudi Arabia is an Islamic state and by failing to make any 1 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Catholic Bishops' Conference of India
    THE CATHOLIC BISHOPS’ CONFERENCE OF INDIA Vol. XXVII India January- December 2018 GUEST EDITORIAL never did anything worth doing by accident, nor did any of my inventions come by accident; they came by work”. These words “I of the great Greek Philosopher Plato in brief summarises this first edition of the refurbished “Catholic India” information magazine of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of India. The Catholic Bishops’ Conference as the apex body of the Catholic Church in India through its Office Bearers and its various offices continuously conducts programmes and activities in favour of society and for the animation of the Church in India. Many of these activities which our Bishops, Fathers and Sisters do, not by accident, but through hard work and much effort are regularly reported on ourwebsite https://www.cbci.in . Over the last 15 months, the website has been visited by over three million surfers. The newsletter Catholic India which now comes out both as an electronic edition as well as a printed one provides just the gist of a few of the activities/happenings/events with a link to the detailed report on the website. This is a novel experiment to make the website news easily accessible to our friends, benefactors and well-wishers interested in our activities. We take this opportunity to thank all those who have made it possible to bring forth this publication. In particular my sincere thanks to Fr. Anthony Fernandes SFX who has compiled and set up the news magazine and to the Manager of Federal Bank, Connaught Place branch, New Delhi, for sponsoring the costs of its publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Matters Court No. 1 (Division Bench-I) Hon'ble the Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr
    13.10.2015 R- 1 ( Regular Matters) **13.10.2015 REGULAR MATTERS COURT NO. 1 (DIVISION BENCH-I) HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH [NOTE: COUNSELS ARE REQUESTED TO BE READY FOR ARGUMENTS IN FIRST FIVE CASES.] REGULAR MATTERS 1. LPA 91/2010 INDIAN CONGRESS (SOCIALIST) DR.SUMANT BHARDWAJ,PR CHOPRA PH PARTY AND ORS. Vs. ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA AND ORS. 2. LPA 577/2012---------| DELHI INTEGRATED MULTI-MODAL RAJAT NAVET,PRASHANT BHUSHAN CM APPL. 17697/2012 | TRANSIT SYSTEM LTD PH | Vs. RAKESH AGGARWAL | 3. LPA 578/2012 | DELHI INTEGRATED MULTI-MODAL RAJAT NAVET,KRITI SINGH PH | TRANSIT SYSTEM LTD GAHLOUT | Vs. SACHIN SAPRA 4. LPA 208/2015 | SUBHASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL PRASHANT BHUSHAN,RAJIV CM APPL. 6624/2015 | Vs. INDIAN FARMERS FERTILISER BANSAL,VIKRAM JETLEY | COOPERATIVE LTD AND ANR 5. LPA 299/2015 | DR M HAROON SIDDIQUI P S SUDHEER,VIKRAM JETTEY | Vs. INDIAN FARMERS FERTILISER | COOPERATIVE LIMITED AND ORS 6. LPA 315/2010 | NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF SHARDUL SHROFF FOR R-3,ASHISH | INDIA LTD AGARWAL FOR R-3,B.V. NIREN | Vs. CENTRAL INFORMATION FOR R-4,OP FAIZI,RITU BHALLA | COMMISSION AND ORS FOR APPELLANT,PALLAVI S. | SHROFF FOR APPELLANT,YASHWANT | GAHLOT FOR R-1,K. LALL FOR | R-2 IN PERSON 7. LPA 429/2010 | NATIONAL AGRI COOP MARKETING OM PRAKASH,MANINDER | FED OF INDIA LTD ACHARYA,BRAHM DUTT | Vs. BM VERMA 8. LPA 439/2010 | NATIONAL COOPERATIVE CONSUMER ANJU BHATTACHARYA FOR | FED OF INDIA LTD APPELLANT,ELGIN MATT JOHN FOR | Vs. RAJ MANGAL PRASAD APPELLANT,BRAHAM DUTT FOR | RESPONDENT 9.
    [Show full text]
  • India – Goa – Evangelical Christians – Shiv Sena – RSS – Jamat-E-Islami
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: IND31233 Country: India Date: 2 February 2007 Keywords: India – Goa – Evangelical Christians – Shiv Sena – RSS – Jamat-e-Islami This response was prepared by the Country Research Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Questions 1. What is the activity of the Bajrang Dal, Jamaat -E-Islam, Rashtriya Swayam Sevak and Shiv Sena against evangelical Christians in Goa? 2. What difficulties do evangelical Christians face in Goa? 3. Would the police in Goa condone and/or be involved in discrimination / persecution against evangelical Christians in Goa by these groups? RESPONSE 1. What is the activity of the above mentioned four groups against evangelical Christians in Goa? 2. What difficulties do evangelical Christians face in Goa? 3. Would the police in Goa condone and/or be involved in discrimination / persecution against evangelical Christians in Goa by these groups? The state of Goa has a significant Christian population. According to the 2001 India census, Goa has a Christian population of 359,568 on a total population of 1,347,668 (there are 886,551 Hindus and 92,210 Muslims). Christianity, and the Catholic Church in particular, has played a significant role in Goa’s history and since Goa’s 1962 integration into the Indian Union this has continued to be the case. Studies of the Goan Christian identity, such as Dr Charles Borges’ 2000 study, tend to emphasize the inclusion and participation of the Christian population in Goa’s social and political life (‘Population by religious communities’ (undated), Census of India website http://demotemp257.nic.in/httpdoc/Census_Data_2001/Census_data_finder/C_Series/Populat ion_by_religious_communities.htm – Accessed 31 January 2007 – Attachment 24; Borges, C.
    [Show full text]
  • India 2020 International Religious Freedom Report
    INDIA 2020 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The constitution provides for freedom of conscience and the right of all individuals to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion; mandates a secular state; requires the state to treat all religions impartially; and prohibits discrimination based on religion. It also states that citizens must practice their faith in a way that does not adversely affect public order, morality, or health. Ten of the 28 states have laws restricting religious conversions. In February, continued protests related to the 2019 Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), which excludes Muslims from expedited naturalization provisions granted to migrants of other faiths, became violent in New Delhi after counterprotestors attacked demonstrators. According to reports, religiously motivated attacks resulted in the deaths of 53 persons, most of whom were Muslim, and two security officials. According to international nongovernmental organization (NGO) Human Rights Watch, “Witnesses accounts and video evidence showed police complicity in the violence.” Muslim academics, human rights activists, former police officers, and journalists alleged anti-Muslim bias in the investigation of the riots by New Delhi police. The investigations were still ongoing at year’s end, with the New Delhi police stating it arrested almost equal numbers of Hindus and Muslims. The government and media initially attributed some of the spread of COVID-19 in the country to a conference held in New Delhi in March by the Islamic Tablighi Jamaat organization after media reported that six of the conference’s attendees tested positive for the virus. The Ministry of Home Affairs initially claimed a majority of the country’s early COVID-19 cases were linked to that event.
    [Show full text]
  • The Catholic Bishops' Conference
    Indian bishops mourn prominent lay leader’s death he Catholic Bishops’ Conference George Menezes carenhas recalled. of India (CBCI) has mourned “He loved the Church with all his the death of George Menezes, a heart. He rendered services as a mem- Tformer member of the Pontifical ber of the Pontifical Council for Laity, a Council for Laity who was best known for Member of the “think thank” of Federa- his writings and humor. tion of Asian Bishops’ Conferences and Menezes, former president of the President of the All India Catholic Union,” All India Catholic Union (AICU), died on the prelate says. September 9 in Mumbai at Bandra, after Bishop Mascarenhas says the Indian prolonged illness. He was 88. Menezes served India as an Indian Air Church had not always agreed with what CBCI secretary general Bishop Theo- Force officer and as a diplomat with the In- Menezes said, but “we were absolutely dore Mascarenhas described Menezes dian Embassy in Paris. He had joined the sure that he loved the Church and want- as “one of the Catholic Church’s beloved, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and became ed the Church to love and be loved.” courageous and illustrious sons.” a member of its national executive. How- Menezes died at his home in Bandra, “A prominent Journalist, award win- ever, he left the party after a short while a suburb of Mumbai. The funeral service ning writer, inspirational speaker and a when he found it incompatible with his was held on September 11 at St Andrew’s divergent thinker, Menezes served God principles.
    [Show full text]
  • CBCI, Policy of Dalit Empowerment in the Catholic Church in India, 96.A
    Policy of Dalit Empowerment in the Catholic Church in India An Ethical Imperative to Build Inclusive Communities Contents Foreword Acknowledgement List of Abbreviations I. Introduction II. Dalit Realities and the Status of Dalit Christians III. Journey of the Catholic Church in Empowering Dalit Christians IV. Biblical-Theological Basis for Building Inclusive Communities V. Roadmap for the Future VI. Action Plan of the CBCI VII. Recommendations VIII. Review and Monitoring IX. The Way Forward 8th December 2016 FOREWORD India is a cradle of many civilizations and religions. Great sages envisaged a common human family and recognized the ray of the Divine in all human beings. Unfortunately, there are also blots in the Indian society such as casteism and untouchability. Many social reformers tried to transform the situation but could not succeed much. The constitution of India clearly spells that “untouchability’ is abolished and its practice in any form is forbidden. The enforcement of any disability arising out of ‘Untouchability’ shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.” (Article 17). Efforts are continuing to eradicate untouchability. 1 The Church has been playing an important role in empowering Dalits. Individually and organizationally endeavors have been made to educate and to employ them. Dalits professing Christian Faith are still denied by the Government of India the benefits of the reservation policy given to other Dalits professing Hindu, Sikh and Buddhist Faiths. During the seminars about Dalit empowerment, meetings with the Dalit leaders, strong suggestions had emerged for a clear policy from the Church on Dalit empowerment. The 125th birth anniversary of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, an unique leader who spearheaded the struggles of the marginalized communities particularly the Dalits, was another occasion for deep reflection on the Dalits issue.
    [Show full text]