Medium-Term Regional Objectives in the National

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Medium-Term Regional Objectives in the National REGIONAL STATUS REPORT OF HUNGARY MEDIUM-TERM REGIONAL OBJECTIVES whole of this region is included in Central Hungary. Its total area is 2 538 km2. In 2007, its population was IN THE NATIONAL SPATIAL 2 million 476 thousand people; and 21.7 thousand DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT more people migrated into the region than out of it during the same year. A TERRITORIAL DESCRIPTION OF THE Budapest has still an outstanding role within the spa- REGIONAL TYPES IN THE NatIONAL SPatIAL tial structure of economic performance since its HUF DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT 5.5 million GDP per capita exceeded the national aver- The Budapest Metropolitan Region age more than twofold, and it was 4-5 times higher than the GDP per capita of the worst performing coun- The capital city and its agglomeration is the most de- ties. The share of the capital city remained high also veloped and competitive group of settlements in the in R&D expenditure; it was more than 60% in 2007. country, also from an international perspective. This 28% of the enterprises in the financial intermediation metropolitan region is considerable not only as an eco- services in 2007 operated in the Budapest Metropoli- nomic, service and innovation centre, but also as an tan Region. A fifth of all enterprises with a similar pro- “international gateway”, significant tourism destination file were concentrated in Budapest itself. According to and transportation hub. Beyond these, it is also very the guest nights spent by foreign visitors, Budapest important to ensure a liveable environment for its out- and its agglomeration is the most significant tourism re- standing concentration of population. gion in Hungary. The share of this region from all guest The Budapest Metropolitan Region is composed nights spent by foreign tourists was 48% in 2007. of Budapest and 80 surrounding municipalities. The Rather intensive suburbanisation is indicated by the proportion of newly built homes, which was 1.1% Budapest Metropolitan area of the entire housing stock in Budapest, and double of this in the agglomeration in 2007. Personal car ownership is also outstanding here; the number of personal automobiles per 1000 inhabitants was 350 in the capital, and 375 in its agglomeration, both sig- nificantly higher than the national average (300). No major new road construction was carried out; there were no new sections of the M0 ring completed in 2007. The most important development in railway transport was the construction of the railway station at Ferihegy Airport. The proportion of homes connected to the sew- age network was 97.8% in Budapest in 2007, and the same was 72.3% in the municipalities of the 36 REGIONAL STATUS REPORT OF HUNGARY agglomeration (the national average was 69.8%). centres (near HUF 1.5 million) exceeded the na- 40.5% of the collected sewage went through biologi- tional average by approx. 15%; Győr (HUF 3.7 mil- cal or phase III treatment in the region. According lion/inh.) and Székesfehérvár (HUF 2.3 million/inh.) to the air-pollution index calculated from data col- were outstanding in this regard. In the economy of lected at automatic monitoring stations, the quality the major cities, foreign capital played considerably of the air at most of the monitoring sites in Buda- smaller role (32%) than nationally (57%). Its share pest belonged to the “polluted” category in 2007. was higher than the national average only in Székes- The main air pollutants were obviously the nitrogen fehérvár (67%). oxides (NO2 and NOx) released from public road traf- Within the wider category of advanced business fic, as well as airborne dust (PM10). In 2007, the services, real estate businesses and economic share of green areas as compared to the total services emerged with the most substantial share of territory within municipal borders was 3.6% in the enterprises. As a consequence of their functions, in Metropolitan Region; the surface of green areas in every pole city, as well as regarding their average val- Budapest was 22.5 km2. ue (27), the number of these businesses per 1000 inhabitants was much higher than nationally (12 en- Development poles terprises). Veszprém and Győr had a dominant role within this region type with 33 such enterprises per The National Spatial Development Concept identifies 1000 people. The region type average was exceeded five regional development poles (Győr, Pécs, Sze- in Pécs and Székesfehérvár (29-30 enterprises), but ged, Debrecen, Miskolc), and two joint development the other pole cities had lower than average num- centres (Székesfehérvár, Veszprém). Their task is bers. The commercial sector is a significant area of to be the engines of development in their respective the advanced business services. The average number regions in the fields of economy and science, and to of commercial enterprises per 1000 inhabitants was retain the most highly qualified labour force within their 18 in this region type, which was only 3 enterprises regions by means of offering them high quality culture, more than nationally. The commercial business sec- services and workplaces, thus counter-balancing the tor of Győr, Székesfehérvár and Debrecen stood out socio-economic dominance of the capital. to some extent (with 19-20 enterprises per 1000 The combined area of the seven municipalities is inhabitants), while the other pole cities had 2-3 enter- 1 614 km2; Debrecen is the biggest among them with prises fewer from these. 461 km2. Their total population was 992.7 thousand In terms of higher education, the three most signifi- inhabitants in 2007. With the exception of Miskolc, cant countryside university towns stood out from among they were migration destinations, and they had a mi- the pole cities: Debrecen, Szeged and Pécs. In the gration surplus of a little more than 3000 people in counties containing these three cities, the total number total by 2007. of students participating in higher education was near In 2007, the average gross added value per cap- 88 thousand, which meant over one-third (34.2%) of ita of the development poles and joint development all students at universities outside Budapest in 2007. 37 REGIONAL STATUS REPORT OF HUNGARY As regards cultural life, 21% of all visits to thea- The circle of external and internal peripheries and tres and 10% of all visits to museums were made in backwards regions in Hungary was defined based on the pole cities. The theatres of Miskolc and Győr had the “Government Decree 311/2007 (XI. 17) about the highest numbers of visitors (189 thousand and the classification of beneficiary microregions”. 94 mi- 167 thousand, respectively), and concerning muse- croregions belong to this category, the total area of ums, Pécs had a traditionally dominant role with 339 which is 53 184 km2, 57.2% of the national territory. thousand visitors. Their combined population in 2007 was 3 million 114 Among the pole cities, only Pécs was without a thousand inhabitants, and the population increased in clearway connection in 2007. The system of high- only three microregions (of Hajdúhadháza, Móraha- rank roads connecting the pole cities was in many lom and Aba). The migration balance was negative in cases, still deficient and of a deteriorated quality. 88 microregions from the 94, and the combined mi- Previously started developments in railway and wa- gration deficit in these microregions was 24.4 thou- ter transport concerning the pole cities (e.g., Szeged, sand people in 2007. Győr) continued in 2007, too. In 2007, within the disadvantaged regions, the The pole cities are significant transport hubs, there- number of enterprises by 1000 inhabitants was high- fore most of the air pollution comes from pollutants est in the microregion of Kaposvár (69), and lowest released by transport (PM10, NOx). The greatest in the microregion of Bodrogköz (17). The region type problem was with PM10: in terms of PM10, air qual- average was 43 enterprises in 2007, much below the ity in Szeged was classified as polluted, the situation national average (68). The share of foreign capital in all was acceptable in Miskolc, and air quality in the rest of subscribed capital of enterprises in the region was only the cities were categorised as good in 2007. Regard- 28%, which meant half of the national value in 2007. ing nitrogen oxides, air quality was acceptable in Győr, Miskolc and Szeged, and it was good in Debrecen. Socially and economically backwards microregions External and internal peripheries, backward regions Permanently backward regions can be characterized by the interaction of several negative factors: unfa- vourable age, qualification and economic structure of the population, restricted availability of resources (shortage of capital, out-migration of the qualified la- bour force), which besides an especially poor accessi- bility, is further aggravated by the lack of real regional centres that could take care of the needs of their surroundings. 38 REGIONAL STATUS REPORT OF HUNGARY Economic performance in the disadvantaged areas population was 1 million 446.2 thousand in 2007, was a mere quarter of the national average in 2007. 14.4% of the total national population. Due to out- GAV per capita was higher than the national average migration, the population of this region decreased by only in the microregions of Tab and Kazincbarcika, 7300 people in 2007, and with the exception of the while it was extremely low in the disadvantaged mi- microregions of Szeged, Kecskemét and Csongrád, croregions situated along the Romanian and Serbian outwards migration is typical of the region, and is es- borers, in Ormánság, Őrség, and in North-eastern pecially significant in the Upper Tisza region. Hungary. The economic performance of this region type was In 2007, unemployment rate in this region type was behind the national average, gross added value per 12.43%, and it remained below the national average capita was less than HUF 500 thousand here, which (6.8%) only in five of the peripheral microregions.
Recommended publications
  • Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of
    Strasbourg, 15 March 2012 CDL-REF(2012)003 Opinion No. 662 / 2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ACT CCIII OF 2011 ON THE ELECTIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2012)003 - 2 - The Parliament - relying on Hungary’s legislative traditions based on popular representation; - guaranteeing that in Hungary the source of public power shall be the people, which shall pri- marily exercise its power through its elected representatives in elections which shall ensure the free expression of the will of voters; - ensuring the right of voters to universal and equal suffrage as well as to direct and secret bal- lot; - considering that political parties shall contribute to creating and expressing the will of the peo- ple; - recognising that the nationalities living in Hungary shall be constituent parts of the State and shall have the right ensured by the Fundamental Law to take part in the work of Parliament; - guaranteeing furthermore that Hungarian citizens living beyond the borders of Hungary shall be a part of the political community; in order to enforce the Fundamental Law, pursuant to Article XXIII, Subsections (1), (4) and (6), and to Article 2, Subsections (1) and (2) of the Fundamental Law, hereby passes the following Act on the substantive rules for the elections of Hungary’s Members of Parliament: 1. Interpretive provisions Section 1 For the purposes of this Act: Residence: the residence defined by the Act on the Registration of the Personal Data and Resi- dence of Citizens; in the case of citizens without residence, their current addresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal C 119 of the European Union
    Official Journal C 119 of the European Union Volume 58 English edition Information and Notices 14 April 2015 Contents II Information INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES European Commission 2015/C 119/01 Initiation of proceedings (Case M.7419 — TeliaSonera/Telenor/JV) (1) ............................................. 1 IV Notices NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES European Commission 2015/C 119/02 Euro exchange rates .............................................................................................................. 2 NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES 2015/C 119/03 Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (1) .................................... 3 EN (1) Text with EEA relevance 2015/C 119/04 Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (1) ............................................................................................................ 4 2015/C 119/05 Communication from the Minister for National Development of Hungary pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons ..................... 5 2015/C 119/06 Communication from the Minister for National Development of Hungary pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons ....................
    [Show full text]
  • Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020
    EUROPEAN PPP EXPERTISE CENTRE Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Terms of Use of this Publication The European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC) is part of the Advisory Services of the European Investment Bank (EIB). It is an initiative that also involves the European Commission, Member States of the EU, Candidate States and certain other States. For more information about EPEC and its membership, please visit www.eib.org/epec. The findings, analyses, interpretations and conclusions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the EIB or any other EPEC member. No EPEC member, including the EIB, accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in this publication or any liability for any consequences arising from its use. Reliance on the information provided in this publication is therefore at the sole risk of the user. EPEC authorises the users of this publication to access, download, display, reproduce and print its content subject to the following conditions: (i) when using the content of this document, users should attribute the source of the material and (ii) under no circumstances should there be commercial exploitation of this document or its content. Purpose and Methodology This report is part of EPEC’s work on monitoring developments in the public-private partnership (PPP) market. It is intended to provide an overview of the role played by the EIB in financing PPP projects inside and outside of Europe since 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Budapest and Central Danube Region
    Touristic areas of the Budapest and Central Danube Region www.hungary.com Talent for entertaining Forest Tourinform Office Etyek-Buda wine region Residence Kunság wine region Castle National Park Castle ruin Region’s border Museum Highway Thermal/wellness bath Railway Airport Ferry World Heritage Budapest – Central Danube Region “Why Budapest and its surrounding area?” This is the obvious question holiday makers will ask when planning their travels, and we hope to provide the answer. Budapest, Heroes’ Square Budapest because: • it is the cultural, political and transportation centre of Hungary; • it is built on both side of the Danube, the great European river that is registered as a World Heritage panorama; • nature is safeguarded in two national parks and a number of environmental protection areas; • it has represented a “multicultural Europe” for centuries – over 200 nearby villages are populated by Hungarians, Serbs, Slovaks and Germans (Swabians); • it has a strong artistic and cultural heritage; • there’s always something happening: festivals, concerts, theatre perform- ances, sports competitions, exhibitions, church events, wine celebrations or handicraft fairs; • there are many outdoor activities to enjoy: trekking, rock climbing, biking, horse riding, golf, rowing, swimming, potholing or fl ying; • its restaurants offer not only Hungarian cuisine – and wine and palinka – but food from all over the world. Don’t hesitate – come to Budapest, the centre of things! Széchenyi Thermal Baths (We have marked our suggested “must-see” destinations with ***. However, these are naturally subjective selections, and we hope that our guests will fi nd their own three-star experiences.) MT ZRT www.itthon.hu Visegrád Castle Games 1 Budapest – Central Danube Region Budapest Buda Castle and Chain Bridge When you arrive in Budapest, head to the centre and drink in the view of the city’s two parts, divided by the Danube and linked by the bridges that cross it.
    [Show full text]
  • V Ö L G Y Z U G O L Y M Ű H E L Y K F
    V ö l g y z u g o l y M ű h e l y K f t . Örökségvédelmi hatástanulmány Véleményezési szakasz 2019. február ALBERTIRSA ÖRÖKSÉGVÉDELMI HATÁSTANULMÁNY Megbízó Albertirsa Város Önkormányzata 2730 Albertirsa, Irsay Károly u. 2. Tel.: 53/570-050, Fax: 53/370-175 Tervező Völgyzugoly Műhely Kft. Székhely: 2083 Solymár, Bimbó u. 20. Levelezési cím: 1024 Budapest, Szilágyi Erzsébet fasor 13-15. Tel.: 1-439-0491, 70-335-9079, 20-913-8575, e-mail: [email protected] Településrendezés, Ferik Tünde – okl. építészmérnök, építészet: településrendező vezető tervező TT/1 13-1259 Bérczi Szabolcs okl. településmérnök TT 13-1411 okl. környezetgazdálkodási agrármérnök Varga-Végh Anna - okl. településmérnök Régészet: Belényesy Károly - régész, örökségvédelmi szakértő (15-016) 2019. február VZM 1326/16 albertirsa_oht_190201.docx ALBERTIRSA 2 ÖRÖKSÉGVÉDELMI HATÁSTANULMÁNY TARTALOMJEGYZÉK BEVEZETŐ .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 ÉPÍTÉSZETI ÉRTÉKEK VÉDELME ........................................................................................................................... 5 1. ÖRÖKSÉGVÉDELMI VIZSGÁLAT ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.1. A település történeti leírása (a történeti település- és tájszerkezet alakulása, a történeti településmag)6 1.1.1. Történeti leírás, a történeti település- és tájszerkezet alakulása ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Albertirsai Sportközpont
    „A sokszínűség harmóniája” A város szerepe Helyzetértékelés Városrészek Tematikus célok Stratégia Akcióterületek Kockázatok Megvalósíthatóság Partnerség Anti-szegregáció Készült Albertirsa Város Önkormányzata részére Albertirsa, 2010. január Albertirsa Város - Integrált Városfejlesztési Stratégia 1 „A sokszínűség harmóniája” avagy Albertirsa Város Integrált Városfejlesztési Stratégiája Megbízó: Albertirsa Város Önkormányzata Polgármester: Fazekas László Témafelelős: Vasvári Csaba A dokumentumot az ÉrtékTérkép Kft. munkatársai készítették: Varga-Ötvös Béla (ügyvezető igazgató) Horváth Dániel, Hirtling Julianna, Horváth Gergely, Monori Mónika, Németh Adrienn Dr. Kopp Erika Dr. Osváth László Albertirsa város Integrált Városfejlesztési Stratégiája (IVS) a Nemzeti Fejlesztési és Gazdasági Minisztérium által kiadott Városfejlesztési Kézikönyv második, javított kiadása és a „Pályázati felhívás és útmutató a Közép-Magyarországi Operatív Program” keretében kiírt „Funkcióbővítő rehabilitáció, Pest megyei településközpontok fejlesztése – Integrált településfejlesztés Pest megyében (Kódszám: KMOP-2009-5.2.1/B)” c pályázati dokumentáció alapján készült. Az ÉrtékTérkép Kft. munkatársai köszönetüket fejezik ki polgármester úrnak és Albertirsa Város Polgármesteri Hivatala dolgozóinak az IVS elkészítésében nyújtott közreműködésükért. 1022 Budapest, Hankóczy J. u. 21/b. – www.ertekterkep.hu Albertirsa Város - Integrált Városfejlesztési Stratégia 2 Tartalomjegyzék Vezetői összefoglaló _________________________________________________________ 6 1. A város
    [Show full text]
  • February 2009 with the Support of the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany & the Conference of European Rabbis
    Lo Tishkach Foundation European Jewish Cemeteries Initiative Avenue Louise 112, 2nd Floor | B-1050 Brussels | Belgium Telephone: +32 (0) 2 649 11 08 | Fax: +32 (0) 2 640 80 84 E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.lo-tishkach.org The Lo Tishkach European Jewish Cemeteries Initiative was established in 2006 as a joint project of the Conference of European Rabbis and the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany. It aims to guarantee the effective and lasting preservation and protection of Jewish cemeteries and mass graves throughout the European continent. Identified by the Hebrew phrase Lo Tishkach (‘do not forget’), the Foundation is establishing a comprehensive publicly-accessible database of all Jewish burial grounds in Europe, currently featuring details on over 9,000 Jewish cemeteries and mass graves. Lo Tishkach is also producing a compendium of the different national and international laws and practices affecting these sites, to be used as a starting point to advocate for the better protection and preservation of Europe’s Jewish heritage. A key aim of the project is to engage young Europeans, bringing Europe’s history alive, encouraging reflection on the values that are important for responsible citizenship and mutual respect, giving a valuable insight into Jewish culture and mobilising young people to care for our common heritage. Preliminary Report on Legislation & Practice Relating to the Protection and Preservation of Jewish Burial Grounds Hungary Prepared by Andreas Becker for the Lo Tishkach Foundation in February 2009 with the support of the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany & the Conference of European Rabbis.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungarian Archaeology E-Journal • 2017 Autumn
    HUNGARIAN ARCHAEOLOGY E-JOURNAL • 2017 AUTUMN www.hungarianarchaeology.hu METAL-DETECTOR USERS AFFILIATED TO MUSEUMS: Building a model of community archaeology in Pest County TIBOR ÁKOS RÁCZ1 The current legal framework governing the use of metal detectors is characterised by its strictness. Even the employees of heritage protection institutions may only perform instrumental surveys of archaeological sites under comprehensive official control. Such rigour is understandable given that the use of metal detectors results in a very significant proportion of the archaeological material hidden underground, which forms a part of the nation’s assets, being either destroyed or transferred to private collections, often abroad, meaning that their value is lost as items of material and cultural history. The most important condition that private individuals contemplating the use of a metal detector must meet is the conclusion of a cooperation agreement with the museum responsible for the area in question. With that provision, the law has delegated the responsibility for overseeing activities with metal detectors to museums. The recent legislation has presented a new challenge to the decision-makers of the institutions concerned, and the experiences of the last few years indicate that no national consensus has been reached on the issues. Museums with local collection areas apply various rules and practices in their respective catchment areas, and that introduces additional confusion into an already opaque situation. Within the framework laid out in the legislation, our institution is attempting to develop a model that is capable of turning activities conducted at the fringe of the archaeological profession, partly illegally, into an asset that serves heritage protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungarian E-Vignette User Guide
    HUNGARIAN E-VIGNETTE USER GUIDE 2017 E-VIGNETTE ROAD USE AUTHORIZATION The e-vignette user charge system applies to motorcycles, passenger cars and their trailers, as well as cargo vehicles with a maximum permissible gross weight of 3.5 tons, campers and buses, and their trailers. IMPORTANT TO KNOW ABOUT E-VIGNETTES • Road use authorization must be always paid for before you enter the toll section; purchased e-vignettes do not constitute authorized road use retroactively. In the case of a purchase within the validity period, the starting date of validity is always the date of purchase. • If you purchase more than one e-vignette at a time, please make sure that you have specified the dates of your journeys (uses) accurately. • In order to avoid unauthorized road use, please always check the registration number, the country code, the vehicle category and the validity period on your control slip when making your purchase. • In case of electronic purchase of the road use authorization, the confirming notification serves as a proof of purchase. From 1 January 2017, changes will be introduced with respect to the toll speedway network and the toll-free sections, therefore, we request you to study the information below in detail. TOLL-FREE SECTIONS According to the decree in force, the following road sections can be used toll free: • the following sections of the M0 expressway: ◦ the section between Main Road 1 and the M5 motorway, ◦ the section between expressway M4 (sign of expressway 4) and Motorway M3, ◦ Megyeri Bridge (the section between Main Road 2 and Main Road 11).
    [Show full text]
  • C196 Official Journal
    Official Journal C 196 of the European Union Volume 63 English edition Information and Notices 11 June 2020 Contents IV Notices NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES Council 2020/C 196/01 Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council on empowering coaches by enhancing opportunities to acquire skills and competences . 1 2020/C 196/02 Council Conclusions on ‘Space for a Sustainable Europe’ . 8 European Commission 2020/C 196/03 Euro exchange rates — 10 June 2020 . 12 V Announcements PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY European Commission 2020/C 196/04 Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9841 – CDP Equity/Ansaldo Energia) Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) . 13 2020/C 196/05 Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9842 – Hitachi Chemical Company/Fiamm Energy Technology) Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) . 15 2020/C 196/06 Notice to exporters concerning the application of the REX system in the European Union for the purpose of its Free Trade Agreement with Vietnam . 16 2020/C 196/07 Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9806 – Hyundai Capital Bank Europe/Sixt Leasing) Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) . 17 EN (1) Text with EEA relevance. OTHER ACTS European Commission 2020/C 196/08 Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 . 19 2020/C 196/09 Publication of an application for amendment of a specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council .
    [Show full text]
  • Transzparencia Tã¡Blã¡Zat 2018 Richter Magyarorszã¡G ENG.Xlsx
    Transfer of Value to Healthcare Organisations Company:Gedeon Richter Plc. Date of disclosure: 2019.06.28 Aggregated Purpose / Description of Name of HCO HCO's principal place of business Category of ToV Amount / Value of ToV ToV (HUF) "Együtt könnyebb" Női Egészségért for the purposes indicated in 1022 Budapest, Felvinci út 25. 2/2. grants and donations 400 000 Alapítvány the founding document for the purposes indicated in "Gondoskodás" Alapítvány 9200 Mosonmagyaróvár, Zichy M. u. 5. grants and donations 200 000 the founding document A Gyulai Kórház Szülészet-nőgyógyászati for the purposes indicated in 5700 Gyula, Semmelweis u. 1. grants and donations 300 000 Osztályáért Alapítvány the founding document for the purposes indicated in A Kistarcsai Onkológiáért Alapítvány 2100 Gödöllő, Kossuth L. u. 13. grants and donations 100 000 the founding document A Korszerű Szülészetért és for the purposes indicated in 1088 Budapest, Baross u. 27. grants and donations 400 000 Nőgyógyászatért Alapítvány the founding document A Magyar Kórházi Gyógyszerészetért for the purposes indicated in 1061 Budapest, Király u. 12. grants and donations 1 650 000 Alapítvány the founding document A meddőség eredményesebb kezeléséért for the purposes indicated in 3521 Miskolc, Csabai kapu 9-11. grants and donations 700 000 és a csontritkulás megelőzéséért the founding document A Nők Egészségéért, Egészséges for the purposes indicated in 6000 Kecskemét, Nyíri u. 38. grants and donations 250 000 Újszülöttekért, Jövőnkért Alapítvány the founding document fee for services / presentation / screening test A S CARDIOSENS EÜ. SZOLG. OKT. TAN 5700 GYULA Budapest krt. 4. 3/13. 114 300 consultancy / consultancy for the purposes indicated in A Szív Hangja Közhasznú Alapítvány 1213 Budapest, Mogyorós u.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungarian Name Per 1877 Or Onliine 1882 Gazetteer District
    Hungarian District (jaras) County Current County Current Name per German Yiddish pre-Trianon (megye) pre- or equivalent District/Okres Current Other Names (if 1877 or onliine Current Name Name (if Name (if Synogogue (can use 1882 Trianon (can (e.g. Kraj (Serbian okrug) Country available) 1882 available) available) Gazetteer) use 1882 Administrative Gazetteer Gazetteer) District Slovakia) Borsod-Abaúj- Abaujvár Füzéri Abauj-Torna Abaújvár Hungary Rozgony Zemplén Borsod-Abaúj- Beret Abauj-Torna Beret Szikszó Zemplén Hungary Szikszó Vyšný Lánc, Felsõ-Láncz Cserehát Abauj-Torna Vyšný Lánec Slovakia Nagy-Ida Košický Košice okolie Vysny Lanec Borsod-Abaúj- Gönc Gönc Abauj-Torna Gönc Zemplén Hungary Gönc Free Royal Kashau Kassa Town Abauj-Torna Košice Košický Košice Slovakia Kaschau Kassa Borsod-Abaúj- Léh Szikszó Abauj-Torna Léh Zemplén Hungary Szikszó Metzenseife Meczenzéf Cserehát Abauj-Torna Medzev Košický Košice okolieSlovakia n not listed Miszloka Kassa Abauj-Torna Myslava Košický Košice Slovakia Rozgony Nagy-Ida Kassa Abauj-Torna Veľká Ida Košický Košice okolie Slovakia Großeidau Grosseidau Nagy-Ida Szádelõ Torna Abauj-Torna Zádiel Košický Košice Slovakia Szántó Gönc Abauj-Torna Abaújszántó Borsod-Abaúj- Hungary Santov Zamthon, Szent- Szántó Zemplén tó, Zamptó, Zamthow, Zamtox, Abaúj- Szántó Moldava Nad Moldau an Mildova- Slovakia Szepsi Cserehát Abauj-Torna Bodvou Košický Košice okolie der Bodwa Sepshi Szepsi Borsod-Abaúj- Szikszó Szikszó Abauj-Torna Szikszó Hungary Sikso Zemplén Szikszó Szina Kassa Abauj-Torna Seňa Košický Košice okolie Slovakia Schena Shenye Abaújszina Szina Borsod-Abauj- Szinpetri Torna Abauj-Torna Szinpetri Zemplen Hungary Torna Borsod-Abaúj- Hungary Zsujta Füzér Abauj-Torna Zsujta Zemplén Gönc Borsod-Abaúj- Szántó Encs Szikszó Abauj-Torna Encs Hungary Entsh Zemplén Gyulafehérvár, Gyula- Apoulon, Gyula- Fehérvár Local Govt.
    [Show full text]