DOCSLIB.ORG

CAPITOL CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY MEETING of the BOARD of DIRECTORS Wednesday, April 21, 2021 | 10:00 A.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CAPITOL CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY MEETING of the BOARD of DIRECTORS Wednesday, April 21, 2021 | 10:00 A.M CAPITOL CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Wednesday, April 21, 2021 | 10:00 a.m. | Virtual Due to social distancing regulations in place, public participation will be via teleconference only. You may join the CCJPA Board Meeting via Zoom as follows: • Call 1-669-900-6833. • Enter access code 970 2187 8471. You may watch the Board Meeting live at www.capitolcorridor.org/ccjpa-board. The full agenda packet, supplemental materials, and presentation materials will be available for download at www.capitolcorridor.org/ccjpa-board. You may submit a public comment via the following methods: 1) Submit written comments: • Send email to [email protected]. • Indicate “Public Comment” as the subject line. • Please submit your comments as far in advance as possible. Emailed comments received by 2:00 pm on Tuesday, April 20th will be provided to the Board in advance of the meeting and will be included as part of the permanent Meeting record. Comments received after that time will be provided to the Board following the Meeting; or 2) Submit verbal comments: • Call 1-669-900-6833. • Enter access code 970 2187 8471. • Dial *9 to raise your hand when you wish to speak. • Public comment is limited to three (3) minutes per person, per item. AGENDA I. Call to Order II. Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance III. Report of the Chair IV. Consent Calendar Action 1. Approval of Minutes of the February 17, 2021 Meeting 2. Suisun-Fairfield Station Lighting and Waiting Shelter Improvements 3. CCJPA/Union Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way Maintenance Agreement V. Action and Discussion Items 1. FY 2021 Operations Budget and Service Modification Action 2. Annual Business Plan Update (FY 2021-22 – FY 2022-23) Action* 3. CCJPA/El Dorado County Transit Authority Bus Service Action 4. Legislation and Funding – State and Federal Action 5. Capital Projects Update - Davis Signal Upgrade and Station Design Info 6. Oakland Waterfront Ballpark District Project Draft EIR: CCJPA Comment Letter Info 7. Managing Director’s Report Info 8. Work Completed Info a. Capitol Corridor Spring Schedule Change 1 b. Annual Business Plan Update Public Workshops c. Corridor Conversations: California Intercity Passenger Rail Leadership Roundtable d. Marketing and Communications Activities (February 2021 – March 2021) 9. Work in Progress Info a. California Passenger Information Display System (CalPIDS) Modernization b. South Bay Connect c. Link21 Program (formerly New Transbay Rail Crossing) d. Surfliner Door Panels Replacement e. Davis Crossovers and Signal Replacement f. Agnew Siding in Santa Clara g. Sacramento to Roseville Third Track Phase 1 h. California Integrated Travel Program (Cal ITP) i. Upcoming Marketing and Communications Activities VI. Board Director Reports VII. Public Comment VIII. Adjournment. Next Meeting Date: 10:00 a.m., June 16, 2021 The CCJPA Board reserves the right to take action on any agenda item. Consent calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted, approved, or adopted by one motion unless a request for discussion or explanation is received from a CCJPA Board Director or from a member of the audience. *Approval of the business plan requires an affirmative vote of at least two-thirds (11) of the appointed members. 2 Item IV.1 (Consent) CAPITOL CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY Regular Board Meeting Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority Board of Directors Minutes of the 120th Meeting February 17, 2021 The 120th meeting of the Board of Directors of the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority (CCJPA) was held at 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, February 17, 2021, via teleconference, pursuant to Governor Gavin Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20 and the California Shelter-in-Place mandate. Chair Saylor presided; Patricia K. Williams, Recording Secretary. I. Call to Order. Chair Saylor called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. II. Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance. Directors present: Don Saylor, Yolo County Transportation District (YCTD); Raul Peralez, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (SCVTA); Bevan Dufty, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART); Lucas Frerichs, YCTD; Jim Holmes, Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA); Bruce Houdesheldt, PCTPA; Janice Li, BART; John McPartland, BART; Steve Miller, Sacramento Regional Transit District (SRTD); Rebecca Saltzman, BART; Harry Price, Solano Transportation Authority (STA); Robert Raburn, BART; Jim Spering, STA; and Lisa Gillmor, SCVTA. Absent: Director Kerri Howell, SRTD. Director Debora Allen, BART, and Director Lucas Frerichs, YCTD, entered the Meeting later. Director Frerichs entered the Meeting. III. Report of the Chair. Chair Saylor gave instructions on the virtual meeting, accessing presentation materials online, Public Comment, and Board Members’ remarks. Chair Saylor also gave thanks to the exiting Directors, Director Allard, and Director O’Neill. Chair Saylor welcomed Director Houdesheldt and Director Gillmor. Chair Saylor thanked staff members, Rose Poblete, Treasurer, and Patricia Williams, Recording Secretary for their careers at CCJPA. Director Allen entered the Meeting. IV. Consent Calendar. Director Saltzman moved the adoption of Item IV.1, Approve Minutes of the November 18, 2020 Meeting; IV.2, Resolution No. 21-1, In the Matter of Approving the State Rail Assistance Administrative/Budget Update; and Item IV.3, Resolution No. 21-2, In the Matter of Entering into Cooperative Agreements with the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission and the San Joaquin Joint 3 Powers Authority for Design, Installation, Operation, and Maintenance of California Passenger Information Display System. Director Miller seconded the motion. Director Houdesheldt abstained from the motion. The motions brought by Director Saltzman and seconded by Director Miller carried by roll call vote. Ayes: 12 – Directors, Saylor, Peralez, Dufty, Frerichs, Holmes, Li, McPartland, Miller, Saltzman, Raburn, Spering, and Gillmor. Noes: 0. Abstentions: 1 – Director Houdesheldt. Absent: 1 – Director Howell. V. Action and Discussion Items. 1. COVID-19 Update Impact of and Response Update. Robert Padgette, Managing Director, gave opening remarks. Leonel (Leo) Sanchez, Deputy Managing Director, presented the item, highlighting ridership recovery; service restoration; front line safety; service modifications, federal emergency relief support; and budget projections. Mr. Padgette gave remarks about the equipment issue. Recording Secretary Williams announced that Mike Barnbaum had submitted a written comment that was previously provided to the Board. The item was discussed. 2. CCJPA FY 2020-2021 Budget Update: Amtrak Operations – February 2021 through September 2021. Catherine Relucio, Manager of Budget, and Administration, presented the item, highlighting the second Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Annual Allocation letter from the California State Transportation Agency, Amtrak Operations, and funding allocations in the FY 21 budget. Chair Saylor invited questions or comments from the Board on Item V.2. No comments were received. Director Price exited the Meeting. Director Raburn moved the adoption of Resolution No. 21-3, In the Matter of Adopting the Updated CCJPA Fiscal Year 2021 Budget: Amtrak Operations – February – September 2021. Director McPartland seconded the motion, which carried by roll call vote. Ayes: 14 – Directors Saylor, Peralez, Allen, Dufty, Frerichs, Holmes, Houdesheldt, Li, McPartland, Miller, Saltzman, Raburn, Spering, and Gillmor. Noes: 0. Absent: 2 – Directors Howell and Price. 3. The CCJPA/Amtrak FY 2021 Operating Agreement – February through September 2021. Budget and Administration Manager Relucio presented the item, highlighting the approval of the four-month extension of FY 20 Operating Agreement that aligns with the funding from the state and would be incorporated with the remaining eight months of FY 21. 4 The item was discussed. Director Raburn moved the adoption of Resolution No. 21-4, In the Matter of Approving of the Agreement for the Provision of Rail Passenger Service (“FY 2021 Operating Agreement”) between the National Railroad Passenger Corporation and the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority. Director Frerichs seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous roll call vote. Ayes: 14 – Directors Saylor, Peralez, Allen, Dufty, Frerichs, Holmes, Houdesheldt, Li, McPartland, Miller, Saltzman, Raburn, Spering, and Gillmor. Noes: 0. Absent: 2 – Directors Howell and Price. 4. Legislative Matters/ Federal and State Funding. Managing Director Padgette presented the item, highlighting the December 2020 COVID Relief Package; American Rescue Plan; and Reauthorization of Fast Act. Recording Secretary Williams announced that Mike Barnbaum had submitted a written comment that was previously provided to the Board. The item was discussed. Director Price entered the Meeting. Director Dufty exited the meeting. 5. Federal FAST Act Reauthorization Ad Hoc Subcommittee. Chair Saylor gave opening remarks to establish an Ad Hoc Subcommittee, appointed by the CCJPA Chair and Managing Director Padgette to guide CCJPA’s input into the passenger rail component of the Federal Reauthorization of the FAST Act in the upcoming year. Director Saltzman moved the adoption of Resolution No. 21-5, In the Matter of Ad Hoc Subcommittee for Federal FAST Act Reauthorization. The item was discussed. The motion brought by Director Saltzman and seconded by Director Li carried by roll call vote. Ayes: 14 – Directors Saylor, Peralez, Allen, Frerichs, Holmes, Houdesheldt, Li, McPartland, Miller,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Capitol Corridor Service Performance
    CAPITOL CORRIDOR SERVICE PERFORMANCE In July 2016, the Capitol Corridor had one of its best months in the history of the service. Ridership was the highest ever, with a total of 128,655 passengers, a 1.7% year‐over‐year (YOY) increase. Revenue was up 4.6% compared to July 2015. Compared to June 2016, On‐ Time Performance (OTP) slipped slightly from 96% to 95%, yet was still above the FY16 standard of 90%. The Year‐To‐Date (YTD) results continue to be in positive territory. Compared to FY15, FYTD16 ridership and revenue are up 5.5%, with the System Operating Ratio at 55%, five percentage points above the 50% standard. YTD OTP is 94%, which keeps the Capitol Corridor in the #1 spot for service reliability in the national Amtrak intercity passenger rail network. The FYTD16 customer satisfaction scores (through June 2016) are at 89% “Highly Satisfied”, one point above the FY16 standard of 88%. The following are ridership highlights for July 2016: Average weekend ridership for July was down 7% versus July 2015. To address these continued decreases in weekend ridership, the CCJPA is modifying the weekend/holiday train schedule effective August 22, 2016, to slot trains at times that align with typical weekend travel patterns. Average July weekday ridership yielded a 9% increase thanks to continued growth on the trains serving San Jose/Silicon Valley and Placer County stations. Amtrak has sent detailed performance results (see attached) for June 2016 and provided below is a summary of the attached tables: OTP: June 2016 system end‐point OTP was a stellar 96% compared to 93% for May 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan Community Workshop Monday, October 16 | 5:00 – 7:30 P.M
    Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan Community Workshop Monday, October 16 | 5:00 – 7:30 p.m. Sacramento Valley Station Green Room 401 I Street, Sacramento Workshop Summary Introduction On Monday, October 16, 2017 the City of Sacramento hosted a community workshop for the Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan. More than 90 community members attended the workshop at the Sacramento Valley Station Green Room, located at 401 I Street in Sacramento from 5:00 – 7:30 p.m. Project Overview The goal of the Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan is to develop two design concepts for a new regional transportation hub, which includes 17-acres of property around the historic depot. The concepts will create a well-connected transit center, a gateway to the city, and a mixed-use destination with compact infill development. Workshop Purpose The purpose of the community workshop was to provide a forum for Sacramento community members and passing transit riders to review and provide input on different elements of two draft conceptual alternatives developed for the Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan. These alternatives were developed based upon City goals and objectives, technical analysis, best practices in planning and urban design, and community input. Key elements of the alternatives include a mobility network, placemaking options, site programming, and future buildout. Workshop Format The workshop was set up in an open house format, with five information stations for community members to review and provide input on with post it notes and comment cards. At 5:30 p.m., a presentation began with remarks by Mayor Darrell Steinberg and Congresswoman Doris Matsui.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Surfliner-San Luis Obispo-San Diego-October282019
    PACIFIC SURFLINER® PACIFIC SURFLINER® SAN LUIS OBISPO - LOS ANGELES - SAN DIEGO SAN LUIS OBISPO - LOS ANGELES - SAN DIEGO Effective October 28, 2019 Effective October 28, 2019 ® ® SAN LUIS OBISPO - SANTA BARBARA SAN LUIS OBISPO - SANTA BARBARA VENTURA - LOS ANGELES VENTURA - LOS ANGELES ORANGE COUNTY - SAN DIEGO ORANGE COUNTY - SAN DIEGO and intermediate stations and intermediate stations Including Including CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES connecting connecting NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Visit: PacificSurfliner.com Visit: PacificSurfliner.com Amtrak.com Amtrak.com Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. NRPS Form W31–10/28/19. Schedules subject to change without notice. NRPS Form W31–10/28/19. Schedules subject to change without notice. page 2 PACIFIC SURFLINER - Southbound Train Number u 5804 5818 562 1564 564 1566 566 768 572 1572 774 Normal Days of Operation u Daily Daily Daily SaSuHo Mo-Fr SaSuHo Mo-Fr Daily Mo-Fr SaSuHo Daily 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, Will Also Operate u 1/1/20 1/1/20 1/1/20 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, Will Not Operate u 1/1/20 1/1/20 1/1/20 B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y On Board Service u låO låO låO låO låO l å O l å O l å O l å O Mile Symbol q SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA –Cal Poly 0 >v Dp b3 45A –Amtrak Station mC ∑w- b4 00A l6 55A Grover Beach, CA 12 >w- b4 25A 7 15A Santa Maria, CA–IHOP® 24 >w b4 40A Guadalupe-Santa Maria, CA 25 >w- 7 31A Lompoc-Surf Station, CA 51 > 8 05A Lompoc, CA–Visitors Center 67 >w Solvang, CA 68 >w b5 15A Buellton, CA–Opp.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Report FY19 Rider Profile CAPITOL Corridorticket JOINT Type POWERS AUTHORITY WORK/ BUSINESS 67%
    Performance Report FY19 Rider Profile CAPITOL CORRIDORTicket JOINT Type POWERS AUTHORITY WORK/ BUSINESS 67% Ticket WithWelcome FY2019, the Capitol Corridor Aboard! celebrated five straight years of Type record-breaking ridership and revenue, with a new all-time high of 10-RIDE 1,777,136 riders and $38.03 million in revenue. ThisWORK/ growth is reflected 18% FAMILY/ BUSINESS OTHER 1% 67% REC/in the FareboxFRIENDS Ratio, which reached a previously unattained 60%. SCHOOL 3% LEISURE 15% 12% ROUND-TRIP/ To build upon this success, and to ensure the Capitol Corridor’s place as ONE-WAY a premier travel choice, the CCJPA is making progress on infrastructure 50% improvements, safety upgrades, customer service enhancements, MONTHLY and service expansion projects. These efforts aim to maintain Capitol 32% Corridor as a quality, convenient,OTHER 1% cost-effective, and flexibleFAMILY/ option for REC/ FRIENDS years to come. SCHOOL 3% LEISURE 15% Rider Profile Ticket Type 12% SHOP/VACATION 2% WORK/ BUSINESS 21 Years of Improvement* 67% SERVICE REVENUE-TO- LEVEL RIDERSHIP REVENUE COST RATIO +275% +284% +508% +100% Rider Customer Satisfaction Profile 10-RIDE WORK/ 18% FAMILY/ BUSINESS OTHER 1% 67% FY 2019 FY 2019 FY 2019 REC/ FYFRIENDS 2019 30 DAILY 1,777,136SCHOOL 3% $38.03MLEISURE 60%15% TRAINS 12% ROUND-TRIP/ ONE-WAY 50% MONTHLY 90% 87% 90% 91% 89% 89% 87% 89% 88% 85% 90% 32% OTHER 1% FAMILY/ FY 1998 REC/ FRIENDS 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 SCHOOL 3% 2018 2019 (PRE-CCJPA) FY 1998 FY 1998 FY 1998 LEISURE 15% 8 DAILY (PRE-CCJPA) (PRE-CCJPA) (PRE-CCJPA) SHOP/VACATION 2% 12% TRAINS 463,000 $6.25M 30% *CCJPA assumed management of the service in 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Corridor Performance Report
    Capito l Co rr idor Performance Rep ort THE CAPITO L CORRIDO R JOIN T POWER S AUTHORITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fiscal Year 2009 was a year of mixed results for the Capitol Corridor. The challenging economic climate affected all sectors of the travel and transportation industry, including intercity passenger rail. Although our performance in FY 2009 was not as strong as FY 2008 – when high gas prices and a stronger economy drove record ridership – we continued the positive growth trend from FY 2007 and years past, and reinforced our record of prudently managing public funds to deliver a high- quality passenger rail service. In FY 2009: • Overall ridership fell 5.5%, revenue was flat, and our revenue-to-cost ratio fell to 47% primarily due to increased labor expenses and revenues that were below projections. • On-time performance reached an all-time high of 93% thanks to our capitalized maintenance program (now unfunded) and improved Union Pacific Railroad dispatching. This makes the Capitol Corridor the most reliable multi-frequency train service in the Amtrak national system. • Customer satisfaction scores continued to improve, despite poor economic conditions and extensive job losses. Over the past 11 years under CCJPA management, the Capitol Corridor’s service frequency has quadrupled, ridership and revenue have more than tripled, and our revenue-to-cost ratio improved by 56%. The CCJPA achieved these gains with very modest increases in State subsidy by constantly improving efficiency and reinvesting cost savings and revenues back into the service. Although ridership declined due to the slow economy we have continued to improve our service delivery, reliability, and customer satisfaction, which consistently tops the rankings of all Amtrak-operated services.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Area Regional Rail Plan, Chapter 7
    7.0 ALTERNATIVES DEFINITION & Fig. 7 Resolution 3434 EVALUATION — STEP-BY-STEP Step One: Base Network Healdsburg Sonoma Recognizing that Resolution 3434 represents County 8 MTC’s regional rail investment over the next 25 Santa years as adopted first in the 2001 Regional Trans- Rosa Napa portation Plan and reaffirmed in the subsequent County Vacaville 9 plan update, Resolution 3434 is included as part Napa of the “base case” network. Therefore, the study Petaluma Solano effort focuses on defining options for rail improve- County ments and expansions beyond Resolution 3434. Vallejo Resolution 3434 rail projects include: Marin County 8 9 Pittsburg 1. BART/East Contra Costa Rail (eBART) San Antioch 1 Rafael Concord Richmond 2. ACE/Increased Services Walnut Berkeley Creek MTC Resolution 3434 Contra Costa 3. BART/I-580 Rail Right-of-Way Preservation County Rail Projects Oakland 4. Dumbarton Bridge Rail Service San 1 BART: East Contra Costa Extension Francisco 10 6 3 2 ACE: Increased Service 5. BART/Fremont-Warm Springs to San Jose Daly City 2 Pleasanton Livermore 3 South Extension BART: Rail Right-of-Way Preservation San Francisco Hayward Union City 4 Dumbarton Rail Alameda 6. Caltrain/Rapid Rail/Electrification & Extension San Mateo Fremont County 5 BART: Fremont/Warm Springs 4 to Downtown San Francisco/Transbay Transit to San Jose Extension 7 Redwood City 5 Center 6 & Extension to Downtown SF/ Mountain Milpitas Transbay Transit Center View Palo Alto 7. Caltrain/Express Service 7 Caltrain: Express Service Sunnyvale Santa Clara San San Santa Clara 8 Jose 8. SMART (Sonoma-Marin Rail) SMART (Sonoma-Marin Rail) Mateo Cupertino County 9 County 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • March 1, 2018 TO: El Dorado County Transit
    AGENDA ITEM 1 D Consent Item MEMORANDUM DATE: March 1, 2018 TO: El Dorado County Transit Authority FROM: Brian James, Planning and Marketing Manager SUBJECT: Regional Fare Comparison REQUESTED ACTION: BY MOTION, Receive and File Regional Fare Comparison BACKGROUND The El Dorado County Transit Authority (El Dorado Transit) routinely surveys regional transit operators for current fare and fare policy information. In February 2018, staff conducted research to compile current fare information for seven (7) regional operators. The following offers comparisons of regional fares, categorized by service type. DISCUSSION Local Fixed Routes The following chart reflects local fixed route fares for the transit operators surveyed: One-Way Fares Monthly Pass/Ticket Books General Senior/Disabled Student General Senior/Disabled Student El Dorado Transit $1.50 $0.75 $0.75 $60.00 $30.00 $30.00 Folsom Stage Lines $2.50 $1.25 $1.25 $95.00 $50.00 $50.00 Roseville Transit $1.50 $0.75 $0.75 $58.00 $29.00 $29.00 Placer County Transit $1.25 $0.60 $0.60 $37.50 $18.75 $18.75 Yolobus $2.25 $1.10 $1.10 $93.50 $46.75 $46.75 Yuba-Sutter Transit $1.00 $0.50 $0.50 $30.00 $15.00 $15.00 Amador Transit $2.00 $1.00 $1.00 $100.00 $60.00 $60.00 Sacramento Regional Transit $2.75 $1.35 $1.35 $110.00 $55.00 $20.00 Averages $1.84 $0.91 $0.91 $73.00 $38.06 $33.69 One-way fares for local fixed route services in the region range from $1.00 to $2.75, with half price discounts typically offered for seniors, persons with disabilities per the Americans with El Dorado County Transit Authority March 1, 2018 Agenda Disabilities Act (ADA) and students.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Notice & Agenda
    MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA DATE: Thursday, June 16, 2016 TIME: 4:00 P.M. PLACE: Yuba County Board of Supervisors Chambers Yuba County Government Center 915 8th Street Marysville, California I. Call to Order & Roll Call Cleveland, Didball (Vice-Chair), Fletcher, Griego, Samayoa (Chair), Sullenger, Whiteaker and Whitmore II. Public Business from the Floor Members of the public may address the Authority on items of interest that are within the Authority's jurisdiction and are not on the agenda for this meeting. Public comment regarding agenda items will be permitted as each agenda item is considered by the Board. III. Consent Calendar All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and can be enacted in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items prior to the time the Board votes on the motion unless members of the Board, staff or public request specific items to be discussed or removed from the Consent Calendar for specific action. A. Minutes from the Meeting of May 19, 2016. (Attachment) B. Disbursement List for May 2016. (Attachment) C. Monthly Performance Report for May 2016 (Attachment) IV. Reports A. Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim for FY 2016/2017. (Attachment) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 11-16 authorizing the submittal of Yuba-Sutter Transit’s FY 2016/2017 TDA Claim as proposed or amended. B. City of Fairfield Joint Procurement Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). (Attachment) RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the execution of a joint procurement MOU with the City of Fairfield for the opportunity to purchase replacement commuter buses as proposed. C. Marketing & Community Outreach Strategy Report.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.2 Transit Lines
    User Guide and Model Documentation for SACSIM19 – June 2020 Transit Lines The major fixed route transit services in the SACOG region are explicitly represented in the transit networks as “lines”, or series of stops served by a transit vehicle at a specified service frequency. Table 7-1 provides a listing of the operators included. Each line operating on a fixed (or largely fixed) route, and with a published schedule, is coded into the SACSIM transit networks. 7.2.1 Transit Service Periods SACSIM fixed-route transit considers five different service periods: • Period 1, spanning from 5:00am until 9:00am • Period 2, from 9:00am until 3:00pm • Period 3, from 3:00pm until 6:00pm • Period 4, from 6:00pm until 8:00pm • Period 5, from 8:00pm until 11:00pm By breaking up transit service into these periods, SACSIM aims to accurately represent how transit service varies throughout the day, e.g.: • Transit availability and frequency differences throughout the day • How transit is affected by changes in highway traffic congestion throughout the day 7.2.2 Transit Line Attributes Table 7-2 provides a listing of the key variables coded for each transit line. • The NAME of the line. o For lines existing in the base year, the first 4 characters refer to the operator name: . AMTR – Amtrak Capitol Corridor service . AUBT – Auburn Transit . CSUS – California State University Sacramento Hornet Shuttle . ELDO – El Dorado Transit . ETRN – E-Tran, in Elk Grove . FOLS – Folsom Stage Line . PLAC – Placer County Transit . RSVL – Roseville Transit . SCTL – South County Link (serving south Sacramento County) .
    [Show full text]
  • Sb 1225 (Padilla) Pacific Surfliner Intercity Rail Corridor-Local Authority
    Attachment 2 SB 1225 (PADILLA) PACIFIC SURFLINER INTERCITY RAIL CORRIDOR‐LOCAL AUTHORITY Modeled after the success of the Capitol Corridor, SB 1225 will establish local authority for the Pacific Surfliner Service: Permissiveness: Authorizes that a local authority may be formed for the Purpose: LOSSAN member purposes of local control agencies have engaged in Cost Effectiveness: extensive discussions Requires the Secretary of Business, regarding the establishment Transportation and Housing to make a of a local authority to determination that a local authority oversee the state‐supported would result in administrative or intercity service. Using the operating cost reductions successful Capitol Corridor as Authorizes Caltrans to enter into an Interagency Transfer Agreement (ITA) a model, these agencies have to transfer those administrative reached a consensus on the functions importance of locally Requires the ITA between Caltrans governed management which and the local authority to detail the will enhance the success of terms and transfer the Pacific Surfliner service, improve the customer Timing: Requires that the ITA be experience, and create executed on or before June 30, 2014, for synergy among all the an initial period of five years transportation providers in the region. Continued State Operations Funding: Requires the state to continue to provide funding to operate intercity passenger rail service by the local authority on an annual basis Minimum Levels of Service: Requires that the level of service funded by the state shall in
    [Show full text]