DOCSLIB.ORG

Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan Community Workshop Monday, October 16 | 5:00 – 7:30 P.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan Community Workshop Monday, October 16 | 5:00 – 7:30 P.M Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan Community Workshop Monday, October 16 | 5:00 – 7:30 p.m. Sacramento Valley Station Green Room 401 I Street, Sacramento Workshop Summary Introduction On Monday, October 16, 2017 the City of Sacramento hosted a community workshop for the Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan. More than 90 community members attended the workshop at the Sacramento Valley Station Green Room, located at 401 I Street in Sacramento from 5:00 – 7:30 p.m. Project Overview The goal of the Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan is to develop two design concepts for a new regional transportation hub, which includes 17-acres of property around the historic depot. The concepts will create a well-connected transit center, a gateway to the city, and a mixed-use destination with compact infill development. Workshop Purpose The purpose of the community workshop was to provide a forum for Sacramento community members and passing transit riders to review and provide input on different elements of two draft conceptual alternatives developed for the Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan. These alternatives were developed based upon City goals and objectives, technical analysis, best practices in planning and urban design, and community input. Key elements of the alternatives include a mobility network, placemaking options, site programming, and future buildout. Workshop Format The workshop was set up in an open house format, with five information stations for community members to review and provide input on with post it notes and comment cards. At 5:30 p.m., a presentation began with remarks by Mayor Darrell Steinberg and Congresswoman Doris Matsui. Greg Taylor, Project Manager for the Sacramento Valley Station, provided an overview of the Master Plan purpose and process before introducing Geeti Silwal, Associate Principal at Perkins + Will, who gave a presentation about the two draft conceptual alternatives for the Sacramento Mayor Darrell Steinberg Valley Station Master Plan area. Page 1 of 14 Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan Community Workshop Monday, October 16 | 5:00 – 7:30 p.m. Sacramento Valley Station Green Room 401 I Street, Sacramento The five information stations and their boards are summarized below. The board displays are available on the project webpage. Welcome Station Board #1 – Site Context o This board provided an overview of the project and included an aerial photo of the project site. Board #2 – Project Goals o This board displayed a Venn diagram highlighting the project goals which consisted of: placemaking, mobility, sustainability, and user experience. Board #3 – What We Heard o This board provided an overview of key community input that was gathered throughout the project through two community online questionnaires, two pop-up workshops, and three stakeholder focus group meetings. Mobility Network Station Board #1 – Transit Network o This board displayed an aerial map of the proposed transit network area of the master plan. The map showed how all transit modes could be integrated into the site, including heavy rail, light rail and street car, buses, and bicycles. Board #2 – Street Hierarchy o This board displayed the proposed street network for 2nd, 3rd, F, and H streets to show how they would integrate with the site. Board #3 – Station Layout Option 1 o This board displayed the proposed Option 1 plan for including transit connections, pedestrian access, loading access, and Congresswoman Doris Matsui passenger drop-off and pick-up areas in relation to the station concourse. Page 2 of 14 Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan Community Workshop Monday, October 16 | 5:00 – 7:30 p.m. Sacramento Valley Station Green Room 401 I Street, Sacramento Board #4 – Station Layout Option 2 o This board displays the proposed Option 2 plan for including transit connections, pedestrian access, loading access, and passenger drop-off and pick-up areas in relation to the station concourse. Placemaking Board #1 – Open Space Network – Option 1 o This board displayed the proposed Option 1 plan for utilizing the public space within the 17-acre site, including potential community amenities such as a river park Greg Taylor, City of Sacramento underneath the Interstate 5 freeway, a mixed- use courtyard as part of an urban office campus, and a transit plaza between the historic depot and the new passenger concourse. Board #2 – Open Space Network – Option 2 o This board displayed the proposed Option 2 plan for utilizing the space in and around the Sacramento Valley Station, including amenities such as a civic plaza in front of the historic depot facing I Street, an access plaza for the passenger concourse at the northeast corner of the planning area, and a plaza at the north end of the passenger concourse at the Railyards. Board #3 – Civic Plaza and Historic Station – Framing o This board showed what the view from I Street facing the historic depot would look like with a historic plaza and new adjacent buildings framing the area, compared to what the view looks like today with the adjacent freeway ramp. Board #4 – Civic Plaza and Historic Station – Elements o This board showed precedent imagery of different placemaking elements that are included in both options’ civic plaza and historic depot plans. These elements include retail stores, restaurants and cafes, gathering spaces, and public art. Site Programming Board #1 – Site Programming o This board showed a map of the Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan site, and highlighted the ½-mile radius around it. It included the number of existing and projected housing units, residents, and employees within the ½-mile radius and within the adjacent Railyards development. This board also included a graph which compared the number of residents per Page 3 of 14 Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan Community Workshop Monday, October 16 | 5:00 – 7:30 p.m. Sacramento Valley Station Green Room 401 I Street, Sacramento square mile for the planned SVS site to other regional transportation hubs including the Denver Union Station and London Kings Cross Station. Board #2 – Built Development – Option 1 o This board displayed the proposed types of building developments for Option 1, including an urban office campus and a high-rise residential building. Board #3 – Built Development – Option 2 o This board displayed the proposed types of building developments for Option 2, which include a mid-rise residential structure and a high density office district. Hinda Chandler, City of Sacramento Future Buildout Future Buildout – Option 1 o This board displayed renderings of the proposed future buildout for Option 1, in relation to nearby landmarks. o This board also showed the first progression of buildout phases for the planning area. Phase 2 includes adding active retail space. Phase 3A includes adding a temporary bikeway to the midway plaza and waterfront, a temporary side board light rail platform adjacent to the passenger concourse, and new developments in the passenger concourse. Phase 3B includes adding bus and light rail route extensions into the SVS planning area, and adding a public plaza near the corner of 5th and I Streets. Future Buildout – Option 2 o This board displayed renderings of the proposed future buildout for Option 2, in relation to nearby landmarks. o This board also showed the second progression of buildout phases for the planning area. Phase 3C includes the construction of the center board light rail platform by the passenger concourse, the development of an elevated concourse, and the full development of the civic plaza, dependent on the removal of the Interstate 5 freeway ramp on I Street. Christina Tung, Grimshaw Architects. Page 4 of 14 Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan Community Workshop Monday, October 16 | 5:00 – 7:30 p.m. Sacramento Valley Station Green Room 401 I Street, Sacramento Phase 3D includes a pedestrian bridge over the tracks to connect the SVS planning area with the Railyards, a completed passenger concourse over the tracks, all Amtrak operations moved to the new concourse, and a repurposed historic depot. Summary of Community Feedback Below is a summary of all community feedback from the board displays. Mobility Network Bicycle network is severely limited - need high quality access from all directions. Consider dedicated bus lanes in / out of station. Access from J Street off-ramps may be challenging without priority access / lanes. Take into consideration bus traffic from northern communities. Why is light rail going back to 7th - poor design - go north under rail? Partner with / create space for other bus providers: Greyhound, Bolt, Megabus, etc. to operate. Amtrak always has just 1 car with comfy seats - will others be added? Transit Network How will tracks shift with the high speed rail? Street Hierarchy Will cars be allowed to drive through it and stop to pick up? Will these be back up? Station Layout Option 1 Bike thruway from F street should stay at grade level. What are the benefits / tradeoffs to the different concourse designs? Get Amazon HQ, upgrade Sacramento to HSR Phase 1. Bicycles! Access, short term parking, long term / commuter parking. Elimination of I-5 ramp is good, what is the alternative connection to I-5? Love the idea of eliminating I-5 on-ramp and creating a pedestrian civic plaza! Option 1 gives the best transportation connections to the historic depot. Bike access to platforms? Station Layout Option 2 Like Option 2 because the station is near the train – it makes sense. Passenger drop off here seems to be more traffic more cumbersome than Option 1. Seems to be little thought to how pedestrians and bikes are going to get up and down. Page 5 of 14 Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan Community Workshop Monday, October 16 | 5:00 – 7:30 p.m. Sacramento Valley Station Green Room 401 I Street, Sacramento Love the idea of the concourse over the tracks.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • March 1, 2018 TO: El Dorado County Transit
    AGENDA ITEM 1 D Consent Item MEMORANDUM DATE: March 1, 2018 TO: El Dorado County Transit Authority FROM: Brian James, Planning and Marketing Manager SUBJECT: Regional Fare Comparison REQUESTED ACTION: BY MOTION, Receive and File Regional Fare Comparison BACKGROUND The El Dorado County Transit Authority (El Dorado Transit) routinely surveys regional transit operators for current fare and fare policy information. In February 2018, staff conducted research to compile current fare information for seven (7) regional operators. The following offers comparisons of regional fares, categorized by service type. DISCUSSION Local Fixed Routes The following chart reflects local fixed route fares for the transit operators surveyed: One-Way Fares Monthly Pass/Ticket Books General Senior/Disabled Student General Senior/Disabled Student El Dorado Transit $1.50 $0.75 $0.75 $60.00 $30.00 $30.00 Folsom Stage Lines $2.50 $1.25 $1.25 $95.00 $50.00 $50.00 Roseville Transit $1.50 $0.75 $0.75 $58.00 $29.00 $29.00 Placer County Transit $1.25 $0.60 $0.60 $37.50 $18.75 $18.75 Yolobus $2.25 $1.10 $1.10 $93.50 $46.75 $46.75 Yuba-Sutter Transit $1.00 $0.50 $0.50 $30.00 $15.00 $15.00 Amador Transit $2.00 $1.00 $1.00 $100.00 $60.00 $60.00 Sacramento Regional Transit $2.75 $1.35 $1.35 $110.00 $55.00 $20.00 Averages $1.84 $0.91 $0.91 $73.00 $38.06 $33.69 One-way fares for local fixed route services in the region range from $1.00 to $2.75, with half price discounts typically offered for seniors, persons with disabilities per the Americans with El Dorado County Transit Authority March 1, 2018 Agenda Disabilities Act (ADA) and students.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Notice & Agenda
    MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA DATE: Thursday, June 16, 2016 TIME: 4:00 P.M. PLACE: Yuba County Board of Supervisors Chambers Yuba County Government Center 915 8th Street Marysville, California I. Call to Order & Roll Call Cleveland, Didball (Vice-Chair), Fletcher, Griego, Samayoa (Chair), Sullenger, Whiteaker and Whitmore II. Public Business from the Floor Members of the public may address the Authority on items of interest that are within the Authority's jurisdiction and are not on the agenda for this meeting. Public comment regarding agenda items will be permitted as each agenda item is considered by the Board. III. Consent Calendar All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and can be enacted in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items prior to the time the Board votes on the motion unless members of the Board, staff or public request specific items to be discussed or removed from the Consent Calendar for specific action. A. Minutes from the Meeting of May 19, 2016. (Attachment) B. Disbursement List for May 2016. (Attachment) C. Monthly Performance Report for May 2016 (Attachment) IV. Reports A. Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim for FY 2016/2017. (Attachment) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 11-16 authorizing the submittal of Yuba-Sutter Transit’s FY 2016/2017 TDA Claim as proposed or amended. B. City of Fairfield Joint Procurement Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). (Attachment) RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the execution of a joint procurement MOU with the City of Fairfield for the opportunity to purchase replacement commuter buses as proposed. C. Marketing & Community Outreach Strategy Report.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.2 Transit Lines
    User Guide and Model Documentation for SACSIM19 – June 2020 Transit Lines The major fixed route transit services in the SACOG region are explicitly represented in the transit networks as “lines”, or series of stops served by a transit vehicle at a specified service frequency. Table 7-1 provides a listing of the operators included. Each line operating on a fixed (or largely fixed) route, and with a published schedule, is coded into the SACSIM transit networks. 7.2.1 Transit Service Periods SACSIM fixed-route transit considers five different service periods: • Period 1, spanning from 5:00am until 9:00am • Period 2, from 9:00am until 3:00pm • Period 3, from 3:00pm until 6:00pm • Period 4, from 6:00pm until 8:00pm • Period 5, from 8:00pm until 11:00pm By breaking up transit service into these periods, SACSIM aims to accurately represent how transit service varies throughout the day, e.g.: • Transit availability and frequency differences throughout the day • How transit is affected by changes in highway traffic congestion throughout the day 7.2.2 Transit Line Attributes Table 7-2 provides a listing of the key variables coded for each transit line. • The NAME of the line. o For lines existing in the base year, the first 4 characters refer to the operator name: . AMTR – Amtrak Capitol Corridor service . AUBT – Auburn Transit . CSUS – California State University Sacramento Hornet Shuttle . ELDO – El Dorado Transit . ETRN – E-Tran, in Elk Grove . FOLS – Folsom Stage Line . PLAC – Placer County Transit . RSVL – Roseville Transit . SCTL – South County Link (serving south Sacramento County) .
    [Show full text]
  • EL DORADO COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY AGENDA Regular Meeting
    Patty Borelli, Chairperson John Hidahl Councilmember Shiva Frentzen, Board of Supervisors, City of Placerville Vice Chairperson District I Board of Supervisors Trisha Wilkins, Mindy Jackson, District II Brian Veerkamp Councilmember Executive Director Board of Supervisors City of Placerville District II County of El Dorado Planning Commission Hearing Room 2850 Fairlane Court, Bldg. C Thursday, March 2, 2017 1:00 PM EL DORADO COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY AGENDA Regular Meeting Chairperson: Patty Borelli, City of Placerville Councilmember Vice Chairperson: Shiva Frentzen, County of El Dorado Supervisor, District II Directors: John Hidahl, County of El Dorado Supervisor, District I Trisha Wilkins, City of Placerville Councilmember Brian Veerkamp, County of El Dorado Supervisor, District III • Wendy Thomas, Alternate for City Councilmembers • Michael Ranalli, Alternate for Board of Supervisors, District IV Executive Director: Mindy Jackson CALL TO ORDER AND CEREMONIAL ITEMS PAGE A. Proclamation of Retiring Transit Driver Gladys Neeley 5 B. Oath of Office 7 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG ROLL CALL ADOPTION OF AGENDA AND APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR The Board may make any necessary additions, deletions or corrections to the agenda including moving items to or from the Consent Calendar and adopt the agenda with one single vote. A Board member may request an item to be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion and possible action, and the item will be moved from Consent and heard as a separate item. Any member of the public may ask to address an item on the Consent Calendar prior to Board action. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, any person may comment on any item that is not on the agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • CAPITOL CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY MEETING of the BOARD of DIRECTORS Wednesday, April 21, 2021 | 10:00 A.M
    CAPITOL CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Wednesday, April 21, 2021 | 10:00 a.m. | Virtual Due to social distancing regulations in place, public participation will be via teleconference only. You may join the CCJPA Board Meeting via Zoom as follows: • Call 1-669-900-6833. • Enter access code 970 2187 8471. You may watch the Board Meeting live at www.capitolcorridor.org/ccjpa-board. The full agenda packet, supplemental materials, and presentation materials will be available for download at www.capitolcorridor.org/ccjpa-board. You may submit a public comment via the following methods: 1) Submit written comments: • Send email to [email protected]. • Indicate “Public Comment” as the subject line. • Please submit your comments as far in advance as possible. Emailed comments received by 2:00 pm on Tuesday, April 20th will be provided to the Board in advance of the meeting and will be included as part of the permanent Meeting record. Comments received after that time will be provided to the Board following the Meeting; or 2) Submit verbal comments: • Call 1-669-900-6833. • Enter access code 970 2187 8471. • Dial *9 to raise your hand when you wish to speak. • Public comment is limited to three (3) minutes per person, per item. AGENDA I. Call to Order II. Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance III. Report of the Chair IV. Consent Calendar Action 1. Approval of Minutes of the February 17, 2021 Meeting 2. Suisun-Fairfield Station Lighting and Waiting Shelter Improvements 3. CCJPA/Union Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way Maintenance Agreement V.
    [Show full text]
  • Yolo County Transportation District to Encourage Participation in the Meetings of the Board of Directors
    AGENDA (530) 661-0816 NOTICE If requested, this agenda can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Federal Rules and Regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Persons seeking an alternative format should contact Kathy Souza, Executive Assistant, for further information. In addition, a person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in a public meeting should telephone or otherwise contact Kathy Souza as soon as possible and preferably at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Kathy Souza may be reached at telephone number (530) 661-0816 or at the following address: 350 Industrial Way, Woodland, CA 95776. It is the policy of the Board of Directors of the Yolo County Transportation District to encourage participation in the meetings of the Board of Directors. At each open meeting, members of the public shall be provided with an opportunity to directly address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board of Directors. Please fill out a speaker card and give it to the Board Clerk if you wish to address the Board. Speaker cards are provided on a table by the entrance to the meeting room. Depending on the length of the agenda and number of speakers who filled out and submitted cards, the Board Chair reserves the right to limit a public speaker’s time to no more than three (3) minutes, or less, per agenda item.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Peer Analysis and Overall Findings
    Chapter 6 Peer Analysis and Overall Findings INTRODUCTION A general review of performance of peers to Placer County Transit can be helpful in determining if PCT falls within the “norms” of transit systems. For this analysis, peers were chosen which similarly provide regional transit and/or commuter or long-distance routes. The peers include: B-Line in Butte County, which operates local fixed routes in Chico as well as regional routes. El Dorado Transit, which has both local fixed routes, DAR and commuter services, and operates within the foothills and into the Sacramento region. San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA), which has a combination of regional routes and local fixed routes, plus a county-wide Dial-a-Ride. SolTrans (Solano County Transit), which operates local routes and school-based routes (similar to the Lincoln Circulator) in Vallejo and Benecia, with regional services to Walnut Creek and Fairfield. Tulare County Area Transit (TCaT) in Tulare County, which offers regional intercommunity fixed routes throughout the county. Data for this analysis came from three sources. Placer County Transit data was derived from the analyses provided in earlier tables. B-Line, SLORTA, SolTrans and TCaT data were derived from the State Controller’s Office annual reports (2016). Data for El Dorado Transit was obtained from operations reports available online. The data for this analysis is presented in Table 32. Note that the Placer County Transit data includes the regional fixed routes, DAR, and PCE services, but excludes the vanpool program. Populations Served Placer County Transit serves a population estimated to be 353,847.
    [Show full text]
  • Western El Dorado County 2008 Short Range Transit Plan
    Western El Dorado County 2008 Short Range Transit Plan Final Report Prepared for the El Dorado County Transportation Commission, and El Dorado County Transit Authority Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Western El Dorado County 2008 Short Range Transit Plan Prepared for the El Dorado County Transportation Commission 2828 Easy Street, Suite 1 Placerville, California 95667 (530) 642-5262 and the El Dorado County Transit Authority 6565 Commerce Way Diamond Springs, California 95619 (530) 642-5383 Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. 2690 Lake Forest Road, Suite C P.O. Box 5875 Tahoe City, California 96145 (530) 583-4053 June 18, 2008 LSC 077530 Executive Summary The El Dorado County Transportation Commission (EDCTC) retained LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. to prepare a 5-Year Short Range Transit Plan to improve and enhance transit services for Fiscal Years (FY) 2008/09 to 2012/13, through June 30, 2013. This plan document first presents and reviews the characteristics of the study area, including demographic factors. A thorough review of existing land use and transportation plans is then presented. The operating history of transit services is reviewed, and demand for transit services in the study area evaluated. Finally, a detailed, financially constrained Short Range Transit Plan is presented for the future improvement in El Dorado County Transit Authority (EDCTA) services. Study Area This study considers the portion of El Dorado County to the west of the Sierra Crest. Population of the area in 2006 is estimated based on U.S. Census data as 144,000. Of this total, 17 percent was elderly (age 60 or above), 2.1 percent was mobility-limited, 6.8 percent were low-income, while 2.8 percent of households did not own a private vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Triennial Performance Audit
    El Dorado County Transit Authority Triennial Performance Audit for Fiscal Years 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18 Prepared for the El Dorado County Transit Authority Prepared by TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT of the EL DORADO COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2017-18 Final Prepared for the El Dorado County Transportation Commission 2828 Easy Street Placerville, California 95667 530 • 642-5260 Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. P.O. Box 5875 2690 Lake Forest Road, Suite C Tahoe City, California 96145 530 • 583-4053 May 15, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 1 Performance Audit Report and Organization .................................................................................. 1 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1 EDCTA Operating and Financial Statistics ........................................................................................ 1 Review of Compliance Requirements .............................................................................................. 2 Status of Prior Audit Recommendations ......................................................................................... 2 Detailed Review of Transit Operator Functions ............................................................................... 2 Findings ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    1 Fiscal Year 2021 Budget For the period of July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 � Regional Transit Sacramento Regional Transit District Prepared by the Finance Division 2 ' \ '\ 3 Fiscal Year 2021 Budget Table of Contents Table of Contents General Manager/CEO’s Budget Message ........................................................... 6 Board of Directors....................................................................................... 13 Budget Adoption Resolution ...................................................................................... 15 Budget Presentation Award ....................................................................................... 16 Executive Management Team ...................................................................... 18 Management & Budget Team .................................................................................... 19 Sacramento Regional Transit District Organizational Structure ....................... 21 District Overview ........................................................................................ 24 District Profile ............................................................................................................ 25 Sacramento Regional Transit District Service Area Map ........................................... 30 Long-Term Financial Policies .................................................................................... 32 Financial Policies ....................................................................................................... 34
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment A
    ATTACHMENT A Agency State 128 Business Council MA 9 Town Transit CT AAATA MI Aberdeen Ride Line SD ABQ RIDE NM AC Transit CA Access Services CA Addison County Transit Resources VT Advance Transit VT Airport (MAC) MN Airport Valet Express CA Alachua County Regional Transit System FL Albany Transit System GA Albany Transit System OR Alexandria Transit Company (DASH) VA Alhambra Community Transit CA Allegany County Transit MD Allen County Regional Transit Authority OH Altamont Commuter Express CA Amador Transit CA Amarillo City Transit TX Amtrak AMTRAN PA Anaheim Resort Transportation CA Anchorage People Mover AK Annapolis Transit MD Annett Bus Lines Anoka County MN Antelope Valley Transit Authority CA Arcata & Mad River Transit System CA Area Transportation Authority of North Central PA PA Areawide Community Transportation System (ACTS) AL Arlington Transit VA Asheville Redefines Transit NC Ashland Bus System KY Atascadero Transit / North County Shuttle CA Athens Public Transit OH Athens Transit GA Atlanta Streetcar GA Atlantic Station Shuttle GA Atomic City Transit NM Auburn Transit (Placer County Department of Public Works) CA Augusta Public Transit GA Avila Trolley CA Baker City Community Connection OR Banning Transit CA Barstow Area Transit CA Bart Bus WI Basin Transit Service OR Battle Creek Transit MI Bay Area Rapid Transit CA Bay Area Transportation Authority MI Bay Metro MI Bay State Cruise Company MA Bay Town Trolley FL Baylink CA BCTA (Beaver County Transit Authority) PA BE Line CA Beach Cities Transit - City of Redondo Beach (BCT)
    [Show full text]