DOCSLIB.ORG

Urban Waters Anacostia Pilot

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Urban Waters Anacostia Pilot Urban Waters Federal Partners Anacostia Pilot Jeff Corbin EPA Senior Advisor to the Administrator September 20, 2011 Anacostia River Business Summit EPA Urban Waters Vision EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson’s vision for the Urban Waters Effort is to protect and restore America’s urban waterways and reconnect communities – particularly underserved communities – to their urban water environments. Messages From Communities Urban Waters Vision People Value their Urban Waters • Urban waters are viewed as treasured centerpieces of urban revival and worth restoring • Restoration efforts result in improved appearance, odor, quality and health of water People Want Equitable Access to Water • People want to have equitable access to waterfronts and waterways • Culturally diverse uses should be recognized. • Upfront planning and community involvement in revitalization efforts result in maintained or enhanced public access People Link Water to Other Urban Priorities • Urban waters are relevant to urban priorities such as education, employment, safety, health, housing, transportation and quality of life • Economic incentives (jobs, business opportunities) are part of restoration efforts Related Activities Brownfields (EPA) Green Infrastructure (EPA) Sustainable Communities Partnership (EPA, DOT, HUD) America’s Great Outdoors (DOI) Environmental Justice (EPA) Bay TMDL Clean-Up Plan Urban Waters Intended Outcomes Connection to urban waters: Greater access to urban waterfront and greater public participation in waterfront activities, such as recreation, volunteer monitoring, clean-ups, education and leisure activities Understanding of urban waters and their potential: Greater public involvement and awareness. of urban waters and their potential for improving public health, economic development, and the quality of life. Sense of public ownership of urban waters: Greater public benefit from improvement efforts, especially in underserved communities, and consequent increased priority given to the improvement of urban waters. Protection and restoration of urban waters: Acceleration of the measurable improvements to urban water quality. Community revitalization: Promote equitable community improvements that capitalize on the social and economic benefits derived from improved urban waters and adjacent lands. Urban Waters Cycle Trick the program! Urban Waters Federal Partnership List of Agencies (Alphabetical by Acronym) CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CNS Corporation for National and Community Service CDC US Department of Health and Human Services – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention DOI U.S. Department of Interior DOC-EDA U.S. Department of Commerce – Economic Development Administration DOC-NOAA U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration DOD –USACE U.S. Department of Defense – U.S. Army Corps of Engineers DOT U.S. Department of Transportation EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency HUD U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development NIH-NIEHS U.S. Department of Health and Human Services – National Institutes of Health – National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture WH DPC White House Domestic Policy Council About the Urban Waters Federal Partnership – Anacostia Watershed The Anacostia River Watershed is one of seven national pilot locations The Partnership seeks to: ◦ Promote more efficient use of federal resources; ◦ Recognize and build on local efforts by engaging community partners; ◦ Work to leverage area resources and stimulate local economies to create jobs; ◦ Learn from early and visible victories to fuel long-term action. 8 Anacostia –A Legacy Of Federal Commitment EPA, US Army Corps of Engineers, National Park Service, NOAA, FWS, USGS and Department of Defense – along with other dedicated Partners in D.C. and Maryland have worked for well over 18 years to bring about improvements in pollution control and watershed health. 9 Progress-To-Date A $2 billion Control Program underway by DC WASA to remove 98% of the combined sewer overflows Clean Water Act Enforcement settlement in suburban Maryland (WSSC) yields over $200 million in sewer enhancements to prevent overflows Wetlands Projects at Kingman, Bladensburg, Kenilworth, Fringe areas adding over 80+ acres of filtering capacity 3 Storm Water Permits (MS4s) cover the entire drainage area – opportunities to promote innovation in a regulatory context Progress-To-Date DC/MD are national showcases for Low Impact Development demo projects Innovative approach to storm water runoff focusing on using nature to filter nature Over $8 million in federal funding Green Roofs supported by DC WASA enforcement settlement (DC now largest acreage on East Coast) Department of Transportation co-sponsorship of joint funding with EPA to extend projects this year Trash Free Potomac Initiative launched by Alice Ferguson Foundation in 2005; Trash Free by 2013! Local Government commitments to action Pollution Budgets approved and in place for major pollutants (TMDLs) Progress-To-Date Implemented (with D.C. & MD) the first interstate river Clean Water Act trash TMDL - Impairments for Contact Recreation and Protection & Propagation of Fish DC - Upper and Lower Anacostia River MD - tidal and non-tidal Anacostia River To restore water quality, the TMDL requires capturing or removing more than 600 tons (1.2 million pounds) of trash from the watershed annually! Progress –To-Date Address Sediment Contamination through Public/Private Networks ◦ Anacostia Watershed Toxics Alliance Stresses public/private partnerships to address toxics issues; Strengthened the Scientific Basis for Action on sediment issues Produced a Toxic Chemical Management Strategy ◦ Outstanding University Consortium tapped to apply innovative capping solutions Sediment Capping Demonstration Underway ◦ Site Clean-ups Accomplished: Navy Yard, NPS sites, Wash. Gas Light, GSA Southeast Federal Center What are we doing? - NOW Environmental Improvements Through Green Infrastructure (GI) “Ground-Breaking”, GI-Driven Proposed MS4 Permit for D.C. Sample Features: ◦ 350,000 square feet of green roofs ◦ Green Streets & Green Alleys Program ◦ 4,000+ trees planted annually; ◦ 100,000 + pounds of trash removed annually from city streets to prevent it washing into storm drains. Will serve as an innovative model for other municipalities What are we doing? - NOW Watershed Restoration & Green Infrastructure (GI) for Managing Wet Weather Runoff ‣Continued Support For Implementation of The Anacostia River Watershed Restoration Plan (ARP) - Produced by the US Army Corps of Engineers through federal, regional, multijurisdictional cooperation. ‣President’s Chesapeake Bay Executive Order- Requiring Federal Facilities & Local Governments to Reduce Stormwater Runoff From Public Lands ‣Working with DDOE and Fed Agencies in Phase II WIP Bay Restoration Plan What are we doing? - NOW Focus On Underserved or Economically Distressed Communities Connected to the Urban Waters NPS and others working to increase accessible recreational and environmental opportunities for surrounding communities NPS and EPA helped to launch Groundwork Trust Anacostia to support residents’ ability to- ◦ improve their local environment, ◦ reclaim vacant lands for conservation, recreation and economic development and ◦ reconnect residents to parks, open space and the River. What are we doing? - NOW Restoration & Research U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and EPA assisting DC to implement stream restoration on the Watts Branch. USFWS also focusing on environmental health-- through a study of Brown Bullhead cancers and monitoring of Snakehead predatory fish. USGS, EPA, MDE, Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties are monitoring real-time surface water quality at three sub-watershed sites. FWS, NOAA and EPA supporting angler’s subsistence fishing study and outreach effort by Anacostia Riverkeeper. What are we doing?- NOW Sustainable Economic Development & Increased Recreational Access Economic Development Agency has developed a five-year Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy that spotlights D.C. Wards 7 and 8 and includes Urban Waters Initiative goals. USDA- Forest Service, NPS, EPA and other partners are working to promote community-led urban forest modeling, forest stewardship, and invasive species removal projects. Continued development of the 16 Mile Anacostia Riverwalk Trail – NPS & DOT What are we doing?- NOW Green Jobs Training Green Jobs/Green Career Training for Earth Conservation Corp: MOU between ECC and EPA to provide and promote green job training, mentoring involving EEPA staff cleaning Anacostia. NPS and EPA support local green job training programs and NPS operates “green teams” to provide summer jobs to local youth and to educate the youth about the environment. What are we doing?- NOW More Sustainable Communities (People, Planet, Profit!) The Chesapeake Bay-Anacostia Green Streets-Green Jobs-Green Towns (G3) Initiative unites a town's green vision with tools needed to accelerate local greening efforts. The result is greater watershed protection, community livability and new green economic opportunities. Where Would We Like To Go? Aligning New Partners and Opportunities to accelerate the pace of restoration and protection ‣ Given The Significant Federal Presence, We’re Starting With Improvements & Enhancements - Targeting Our Federal Lands and Facilities. ‣ We’re Also Evaluating Opportunities Through New Federal Agency Partners, Like HUD and Health &
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 200115 SFRA Course
    Security-related procedures and requirements are a fact of life for today's pilots, especially those who operate in the Washington, DC metropolitan area Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA) and the DC Flight Restricted Zone (FRZ). Although the rules may sound intimidating, they are not difficult. This course is intended to provide the information you need to fly safely, correctly, and confidently in this airspace. 1 This slide provides a summary of the changes made since the last version of this course. The only changes for this edition are new procedures for filing flight plans for the Flight Restricted Zone, or FRZ. As stated in the regulatory review section, 14 CFR 91.161 requires this training for pilots flying under visual flight rules (VFR) within a 60 nm radius of the Washington DC VOR/DME. This training is a one-time-only requirement, but it is a good idea to periodically review the material for updates and to refresh your knowledge. You should print the certificate of training completion. You do not have to carry it with you, but you must provide it within a reasonable period of time if requested. Now, let’s get started. 2 After the September 11 terrorist attacks, security authorities established the Washington DC Air Defense Identification Zone – the ADIZ – and the Flight Restricted Zone – the FRZ – to protect the nation’s capital. The ADIZ and the FRZ were established and operated via temporary flight restriction, or TFR, until the FAA developed a final rule that took effect on February 17, 2009. That rule codified the ADIZ and the FRZ in 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 93 as the DC Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA).
    [Show full text]
  • Flying the Line Flying the Line the First Half Century of the Air Line Pilots Association
    Flying the Line Flying the Line The First Half Century of the Air Line Pilots Association By George E. Hopkins The Air Line Pilots Association Washington, DC International Standard Book Number: 0-9609708-1-9 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 82-073051 © 1982 by The Air Line Pilots Association, Int’l., Washington, DC 20036 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America First Printing 1982 Second Printing 1986 Third Printing 1991 Fourth Printing 1996 Fifth Printing 2000 Sixth Printing 2007 Seventh Printing 2010 CONTENTS Chapter 1: What’s a Pilot Worth? ............................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Stepping on Toes ...................................................................... 9 Chapter 3: Pilot Pushing .......................................................................... 17 Chapter 4: The Airmail Pilots’ Strike of 1919 ........................................... 23 Chapter 5: The Livermore Affair .............................................................. 30 Chapter 6: The Trouble with E. L. Cord .................................................. 42 Chapter 7: The Perils of Washington ........................................................ 53 Chapter 8: Flying for a Rogue Airline ....................................................... 67 Chapter 9: The Rise and Fall of the TWA Pilots Association .................... 78 Chapter 10: Dave Behncke—An American Success Story ......................... 92 Chapter 11: Wartime.............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Note for Amendment LCO 10024
    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 Hartford, CT 06106 (860) 240-0200 http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa sHB-5586 AN ACT CONCERNING THE EXPANSION OF THE CRISIS INITIATIVE PILOT PROGRAM THROUGHOUT THE STATE AND THE EMERGENCY INTERVENTION BY A POLICE OFFICER WHEN A PERSON SUFFERS AN OPIOID OVERDOSE. AMENDMENT LCO No.: 10024 File Copy No.: 377 House Calendar No.: 290 OFA Fiscal Note State Impact: Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 22 $ FY 23 $ Mental Health & Addiction Serv., GF - Cost 96,300 99,200 Dept. State Comptroller - Fringe GF - Cost 39,800 41,000 Benefits1 Department of Emergency GF - Cost Up to See Below Services and Public Protection 160,000 Note: GF=General Fund Municipal Impact: None Explanation The amendment strikes the underlying bill and its associated fiscal impact resulting in the following impact. Section 1 results in a cost to the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (DMHAS) of approximately $96,300 in FY 22 and FY $99,200 in 23 (with associated fringe costs of $39,800 and $41,000, respectively) to support an additional social worker at Troop D. 1The fringe benefit costs for most state employees are budgeted centrally in accounts administered by the Comptroller. The estimated active employee fringe benefit cost associated with most personnel changes is 41.3% of payroll in FY 22 and FY 23. Primary Analyst: ME 6/4/21 Contributing Analyst(s): () 2021HB-05586-R00LCO10024-FNA.DOCX Page 2 of 2 Currently, one DMHAS social worker assists state police at Troop E in de-escalating situations involving individuals with mental illness and ensures access to follow-up services.
    [Show full text]
  • Murder-Suicide Ruled in Shooting a Homicide-Suicide Label Has Been Pinned on the Deaths Monday Morning of an Estranged St
    -* •* J 112th Year, No: 17 ST. JOHNS, MICHIGAN - THURSDAY, AUGUST 17, 1967 2 SECTIONS - 32 PAGES 15 Cents Murder-suicide ruled in shooting A homicide-suicide label has been pinned on the deaths Monday morning of an estranged St. Johns couple whose divorce Victims had become, final less than an hour before the fatal shooting. The victims of the marital tragedy were: *Mrs Alice Shivley, 25, who was shot through the heart with a 45-caliber pistol bullet. •Russell L. Shivley, 32, who shot himself with the same gun minutes after shooting his wife. He died at Clinton Memorial Hospital about 1 1/2 hqurs after the shooting incident. The scene of the tragedy was Mrsy Shivley's home at 211 E. en name, Alice Hackett. Lincoln Street, at the corner Police reconstructed the of Oakland Street and across events this way. Lincoln from the Federal-Mo­ gul plant. It happened about AFTER LEAVING court in the 11:05 a.m. Monday. divorce hearing Monday morn­ ing, Mrs Shivley —now Alice POLICE OFFICER Lyle Hackett again—was driven home French said Mr Shivley appar­ by her mother, Mrs Ruth Pat­ ently shot himself just as he terson of 1013 1/2 S. Church (French) arrived at the home Street, Police said Mrs Shlv1 in answer to a call about a ley wanted to pick up some shooting phoned in fromtheFed- papers at her Lincoln Street eral-Mogul plant. He found Mr home. Shivley seriously wounded and She got out of the car and lying on the floor of a garage went in the front door* Mrs MRS ALICE SHIVLEY adjacent to -• the i house on the Patterson got out of-'the car east side.
    [Show full text]
  • The Outcome of ATC Message Length and Complexity on En Route Pilot Readback Performance
    DOT/FAA/AM-09/2 Office of Aerospace Medicine Washington, DC 20591 The Outcome of ATC Message Length and Complexity on En Route Pilot Readback Performance O. Veronika Prinzo Civil Aerospace Medical Institute Federal Aviation Administration Oklahoma City, OK 73125 A.M. Hendrix R. Hendrix Hendrix & Hendrix Roswell, NM 88201 January 2009 Final Report OK-09-0434 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents thereof. ___________ This publication and all Office of Aerospace Medicine technical reports are available in full-text from the Civil Aerospace Medical Institute’s publications Web site: www.faa.gov/library/reports/medical/oamtechreports/index.cfm Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. DOT/FAA/AM-09/2 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date The outcome of ATC message length and complexity on en route pilot January 2009 6. Performing Organization Code readback performance 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. 1 2 2 Prinzo OV, Hendrix AM, Hendrix R 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) 1FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute 2Hendrix & Hendrix P.O. Box 25082 Oklahoma City, OK 15 Circle Drive 11. Contract or Grant No. 73125 Roswell, NM 88201 12. Sponsoring Agency name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Office of Aerospace Medicine Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplemental Notes This work was performed under Task AM-B-06-HRR-516.
    [Show full text]
  • Fringe Season 1 Transcripts
    PROLOGUE Flight 627 - A Contagious Event (Glatterflug Airlines Flight 627 is enroute from Hamburg, Germany to Boston, Massachusetts) ANNOUNCEMENT: ... ist eingeschaltet. Befestigen sie bitte ihre Sicherheitsgürtel. ANNOUNCEMENT: The Captain has turned on the fasten seat-belts sign. Please make sure your seatbelts are securely fastened. GERMAN WOMAN: Ich möchte sehen wie der Film weitergeht. (I would like to see the film continue) MAN FROM DENVER: I don't speak German. I'm from Denver. GERMAN WOMAN: Dies ist mein erster Flug. (this is my first flight) MAN FROM DENVER: I'm from Denver. ANNOUNCEMENT: Wir durchfliegen jetzt starke Turbulenzen. Nehmen sie bitte ihre Plätze ein. (we are flying through strong turbulence. please return to your seats) INDIAN MAN: Hey, friend. It's just an electrical storm. MORGAN STEIG: I understand. INDIAN MAN: Here. Gum? MORGAN STEIG: No, thank you. FLIGHT ATTENDANT: Mein Herr, sie müssen sich hinsetzen! (sir, you must sit down) Beruhigen sie sich! (calm down!) Beruhigen sie sich! (calm down!) Entschuldigen sie bitte! Gehen sie zu ihrem Sitz zurück! [please, go back to your seat!] FLIGHT ATTENDANT: (on phone) Kapitän! Wir haben eine Notsituation! (Captain, we have a difficult situation!) PILOT: ... gibt eine Not-... (... if necessary...) Sprechen sie mit mir! (talk to me) Was zum Teufel passiert! (what the hell is going on?) Beruhigen ... (...calm down...) Warum antworten sie mir nicht! (why don't you answer me?) Reden sie mit mir! (talk to me) ACT I Turnpike Motel - A Romantic Interlude OLIVIA: Oh my god! JOHN: What? OLIVIA: This bed is loud. JOHN: You think? OLIVIA: We can't keep doing this.
    [Show full text]
  • Fringe Benefits-3Rd Qtr. 2020
    XX. Qualified Transportation Plans XVIII-XIX. [Reserved] XX. Qualified Transportation Plans A. Overview M. How Does a Pre-Tax Compensation Reduction Plan Compare With FSAs B. Who Can Sponsor and Who Can Offered Under a Pre-Tax Salary Participate in a Qualified Transportation Reduction Plan? Plan? N. How Do Employees (and Employers) Save C. What Types of Transportation Fringe on Taxes With a Pre-Tax Compensation Benefits May Be Offered in General? Reduction Plan? D. Qualified Parking O. Compensation Reduction Elections E. Transit Passes P. Carryovers Allowed for Current F. Vanpooling Participants; Former Participants Cannot Have Unused Amounts Refunded G. Bicycle Commuting Reimbursement Q. Expense Substantiation and Other H. How to Administer the Statutory Limits Requirements for Cash Reimbursements I. Plan Design Choices and Documents R. Are There Any Reporting and Disclosure Needed to Establish and Administer Obligations? a Plan S. How Are Other Benefits Affected by a J. Plan Design #1: Employer Gives Away Qualified Transportation Plan? Transportation Fringe Benefits; No Choice (the Giveaway Plan) T. Deduction Limits and Other Laws Affecting Qualified Transportation Plans K. Plan Design #2: Employees Have Choice Between Compensation and U. Consequences of Noncompliance Transportation Fringe Benefits (the Pre- V. Correcting Mistakes Tax Compensation Reduction Plan) W. Other Special Design and Administration L. Plan Design #3: Combination Giveaway Issues Plan With Pre-Tax Compensation X. Finding the Applicable Laws (and Other Reductions and/or Cash-Outs Useful Information) Regarding Transportation Fringe Benefits A. Overview This Section discusses the tax treatment of qualified transportation fringe benefits that are made available to employees by their employers under Code § 132(f).
    [Show full text]
  • SECTION IV: Project Proposals 4.1 Abstract
    SECTION IV: Project Proposals 4.1 Abstract To address the needs of the El Paso ISD community, the district proposes a balanced strategy with vertical alignment to serve the academic, and social and emotional wellbeing of students and staff. Targeted services for elementary populations include professional development (PD) for elementary school staff to implement differentiated learning strategies that address the variable needs of students along with comprehensive tutoring for RTI. Specialized PD will be provided to all campus teachers, instructional coaches, and administrators to better understand specific learning losses and how to differentiate for students, per their individual needs, to include SEL support. These sessions will also provide training to develop plans on differentiated student support. Three to five long-term subs will be hired at each campus to assist with coverage for teachers to plan and support teachers and teams with pull-outs/push-in efforts. These permanent campus subs will be included in PLCs, trainings and other supports to ensure high quality coverage of classes and groups. Substitutes will allow teachers to plan, assess data, and adjust instruction. Tutors will assist with RTI in the form of small groups and will assist teachers enabling staff to reach more students in greater depth. To compliment academic PD, El Paso ISD will also offer positive culture building and customer service PD to improve the districts relationship with internal stakeholders and external partners. Afterschool community learning centers will be placed in the schools with the largest gaps in learning loss. These after school community learning centers will model the 21st Century Community Learning Centers that align with the Every Student Succeeds Act.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Pilot Production Report
    Each year between January and April, Los Angeles residents observe a marked increase in local on-location filming. New television pilots, produced in anticipation of May screenings for television advertisers, join continuing TV series, feature films and commercial projects in competition for talent, crews, stage 6255 W. Sunset Blvd. CREDITS: space and sought-after locations. 12th Floor Research Analysts: Hollywood, CA 90028 Adrian McDonald However, Los Angeles isn’t the only place in North America Corina Sandru hosting pilot production. Other jurisdictions, most notably New Graphic Design: York and the Canadian city of Vancouver have established http://www.filmla.com/ Shane Hirschman themselves as strong competitors for this lucrative part of @FilmLA Hollywood’s business tradition. Below these top competitors is FilmLA Photography: a second-tier of somewhat smaller players in Georgia, Louisiana Shutterstock and Ontario, Canada— home to Toronto. FilmL.A.’s official count shows that 202 broadcast, cable and digital pilots (111 Dramas, 91 Comedies) were produced during the 2014-15 development cycle, one less than the prior year, TABLE OF CONTENTS which was the most productive on record by a large margin. Out of those 202 pilots, a total of 91 projects (21 Dramas, 70 WHAT’S A PILOT? 3 Comedies) were filmed in the Los Angeles region. NETWORK, CABLE, AND DIGITAL 4 FilmL.A. defines a development cycle as the period leading up to GROWTH OF DIGITAL PILOTS 4 the earliest possible date that new pilots would air, post-pickup. DRAMA PILOTS 5 Thus, the 2013-14 development cycle includes production COMEDY PILOTS 5 activity that starts in 2013 and continues into 2014 for show THE MAINSTREAMING OF “STRAIGHT-TO-SERIES” PRODUCTION 6 starts at any time in 2014 (or later).
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Losses in High Risk Flood Hazard Area
    REDUCING LOSSES IN HIGH RISK FLOOD HAZARD AREAS: A GUIDEBOOK FOR LOCAL OFFICIALS Prepared by The Association of State Floodplain Managers for The Federal Emergency Management Agency 1985 PREFACE As indicated by its title, this publication is intended to provide guidance to local officials in their efforts to reduce flood losses in high risk flood areas. Since some of these high risk flood areas have not been specifically identified by the Federal Insurance Administration, the implementation of appropriate floodplain man- agement criteria for those areas is not required for participation in the National Flood In- surance Program. However, for those communities which have experienced losses to life and property in those high risk flood areas and which have an interest in addressing those hazards, the community options and management strategies which follow are available for their consideration and, where appropriate, their use. The community options, with ac- companying examples of adopted local/state measures, or suggested model ordinance lan- guage, should provide useful guidance to the local decision maker. The Federal Insurance Administration believes that reducing flood damages in high risk flood hazard areas can and should be addressed at the local or state level. Therefore, while not a condition of participation in the National Flood Insurance Pro- gram, the use of these community options and management strategies is encouraged. This guidebook should greatly facilitate that effort. ii HOW TO USE THIS GUIDEBOOK This guidebook has been prepared to help local governments improve the effec- tiveness of their floodplain management programs for high risk flood hazard areas. It is designed to: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–20 Edition) § 93.335
    Federal Aviation Administration, DOT Pt. 93 Section 5. Deviation Authority Approval tification occurred on or before April 9, 1997, that are equipped with an automatic altitude The Administrator may authorize an air- control system with flight management/per- craft operator to deviate from the require- formance system inputs. ments of §§ 91.180 or 91.706 for a specific flight (3) An altitude alert system that signals an in RVSM airspace if— alert when the altitude displayed to the (a) The operator submits a request in a flightcrew deviates from the selected alti- time and manner acceptable to the Adminis- tude by more than— trator; and (i) ±300 feet for aircraft for which applica- (b) At the time of filing the flight plan for tion for type certification was made on or that flight, ATC determines that the aircraft before April 9, 1997; or may be provided appropriate separation and (ii) ±200 feet for aircraft for which applica- that the flight will not interfere with, or im- tion for type certification is made after pose a burden on, RVSM operations. April 9, 1997. Section 6. Reporting Altitude-Keeping Errors (4) A TCAS II that meets TSO C–119b (Version 7.0), or a later version, if equipped Each operator shall report to the Adminis- with TCAS II, unless otherwise authorized trator each event in which the operator’s by the Administrator. aircraft has exhibited the following altitude- (5) Unless authorized by ATC or the foreign keeping performance: country where the aircraft is operated, an (a) Total vertical error of 300 feet or more; ADS–B Out system that meets the equip- (b) Altimetry system error of 245 feet or ment performance requirements of § 91.227 of more; or this part.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlating Enhanced National Wetlands Inventory Data with Wetland Functions for Watershed Assessments: a Rationale for Northeastern U.S
    CORRELATING ENHANCED NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY DATA WITH WETLAND FUNCTIONS FOR WATERSHED ASSESSMENTS: A RATIONALE FOR NORTHEASTERN U.S. WETLANDS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory Program Northeast Region 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035 Correlating Enhanced National Wetlands Inventory Data with Wetland Functions for Watershed Assessments: A Rationale for Northeastern U.S. Wetlands Ralph W. Tiner Regional Wetland Coordinator U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Northeast Region 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035 October 2003 This publication should be cited as: Tiner, R.W. 2003. Correlating Enhanced National Wetlands Inventory Data with Wetland Functions for Watershed Assessments: A Rationale for Northeastern U.S. Wetlands. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory Program, Region 5, Hadley, MA. 26 pp. Table of Contents Page Background 1 Limitations of the Preliminary Wetland Functional Assessment 2 Rationale for Preliminary Functional Assessments 4 Surface Water Detention 4 Coastal Storm Surge Detention 6 Streamflow Maintenance 6 Nutrient Transformation 7 Retention of Sediments and Other Particulates 9 Shoreline Stabilization 11 Provision of Habitat for Fish and Other Aquatic Animals 11 Provision of Waterfowl and Waterbird Habitat 13 Provision of Other Wildlife Habitat 15 Conservation of Biodiversity 19 Summary 21 Acknowledgments 22 References 23 Background The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has been conducting the National Wetlands Inventory for over 25 years. The NWI Program has produced
    [Show full text]