DOCSLIB.ORG

14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–20 Edition) § 93.335

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–20 Edition) § 93.335 Federal Aviation Administration, DOT Pt. 93 Section 5. Deviation Authority Approval tification occurred on or before April 9, 1997, that are equipped with an automatic altitude The Administrator may authorize an air- control system with flight management/per- craft operator to deviate from the require- formance system inputs. ments of §§ 91.180 or 91.706 for a specific flight (3) An altitude alert system that signals an in RVSM airspace if— alert when the altitude displayed to the (a) The operator submits a request in a flightcrew deviates from the selected alti- time and manner acceptable to the Adminis- tude by more than— trator; and (i) ±300 feet for aircraft for which applica- (b) At the time of filing the flight plan for tion for type certification was made on or that flight, ATC determines that the aircraft before April 9, 1997; or may be provided appropriate separation and (ii) ±200 feet for aircraft for which applica- that the flight will not interfere with, or im- tion for type certification is made after pose a burden on, RVSM operations. April 9, 1997. Section 6. Reporting Altitude-Keeping Errors (4) A TCAS II that meets TSO C–119b (Version 7.0), or a later version, if equipped Each operator shall report to the Adminis- with TCAS II, unless otherwise authorized trator each event in which the operator’s by the Administrator. aircraft has exhibited the following altitude- (5) Unless authorized by ATC or the foreign keeping performance: country where the aircraft is operated, an (a) Total vertical error of 300 feet or more; ADS–B Out system that meets the equip- (b) Altimetry system error of 245 feet or ment performance requirements of § 91.227 of more; or this part. The aircraft must have its height- (c) Assigned altitude deviation of 300 feet keeping performance monitored in a form or more. and manner acceptable to the Administrator. (b) The altimetry system error (ASE) of Section 7. Removal or Amendment of Authority the aircraft does not exceed 200 feet when op- The Administrator may prohibit or re- erating in RVSM airspace. strict an operator from conducting oper- [Doc. No. 28870, 62 FR 17487, Apr. 9, 1997, as ations in RVSM airspace, if the Adminis- amended by Amdt. 91–261, 65 FR 5942, Feb. 7, trator determines that the operator is not 2000; Amdt. 91–271, 66 FR 63895, Dec. 10, 2001; complying, or is unable to comply, with this Amdt. 91–274, 68 FR 54584, Sept. 17, 2003; appendix or subpart H of this part. Examples Amdt. 91–276, 68 FR 70133, Dec. 17, 2003; Dock- of reasons for amendment, revocation, or re- et FAA–2015–1746, Amdt. 91–342, 81 FR 47017, striction include, but are not limited to, an July 20, 2016; Docket FAA–2016–9154, Amdt. operator’s: 91–348, 82 FR 39664, Aug. 22, 2017; FAA-2017- (a) Committing one or more altitude-keep- 0782, Amdt. No. 91-354, 83 FR 65492, Dec. 21, ing errors in RVSM airspace; 2018] (b) Failing to make an effective and timely response to identify and correct an altitude- keeping error; or PART 93—SPECIAL AIR TRAFFIC (c) Failing to report an altitude-keeping RULES error. SPECIAL FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION NO. Section 8. Airspace Designation 60 [NOTE] RVSM may be applied in all ICAO Flight Information Regions (FIRs). Subpart A—General Section 9. Aircraft Equipped With Automatic Sec. Dependent Surveillance—Broadcast Out 93.1 Applicability. An operator is authorized to conduct flight Subparts B–C [Reserved] in airspace in which RVSM is applied pro- vided: Subpart D—Anchorage, Alaska, Terminal (a) The aircraft is equipped with the fol- Area lowing: (1) Two operational independent altitude 93.51 Applicability. measurement systems. 93.53 Description of area. (2) At least one automatic altitude control 93.55 Subdivision of Terminal Area. system that controls the aircraft altitude— 93.57 General rules: All segments. (i) Within a tolerance band of ±65 feet 93.59 General rules: International segment. about an acquired altitude when the aircraft 93.61 General rules: Lake Hood segment. is operated in straight and level flight under 93.63 General rules: Merrill segment. nonturbulent, nongust conditions; or 93.65 General rules: Elmendorf segment. (ii) Within a tolerance band of ±130 feet 93.67 General rules: Bryant segment. under nonturbulent, nongust conditions for 93.68 General rules: Seward Highway seg- aircraft for which application for type cer- ment. 873 VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:36 May 19, 2021 Jkt 253047 PO 00000 Frm 00883 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\14\14V2.TXT PC31 kpayne on VMOFRWIN702 with $$_JOB Pt. 93 14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–21 Edition) 93.69 Special requirements, Lake Campbell 93.177 Operations in the Special Air Traffic and Sixmile Lake Airports. Rule Area. Subpart E—Flight Restrictions in the Vicinity Subparts P–R [Reserved] of Niagara Falls, New York Subpart S—Allocation of Commuter and 93.71 General operating procedures. Air Carrier IFR Operations at High Den- sity Traffic Airports Subpart F—Valparaiso, Florida, Terminal Area 93.211 Applicability. 93.213 Definitions and general provisions. 93.80 Applicability. 93.215 Initial allocation of slots. 93.81 Applicability and description of area. 93.217 Allocation of slots for international 93.83 Aircraft operations. operations and applicable limitations. 93.218 Slots for transborder service to and Subpart G—Special Flight Rules in the from Canada. Vicinity of Los Angeles International Airport 93.219 Allocation of slots for essential air service operations and applicable limita- 93.91 Applicability. tions. 93.93 Description of area. 93.221 Transfer of slots. 93.95 General operating procedures. 93.223 Slot withdrawal. 93.97 Operations in the SFRA. 93.224 Return of slots. 93.225 Lottery of available slots. Subpart H—Mandatory Use of the New 93.226 Allocation of slots in low-demand pe- York North Shore Helicopter Route riods. 93.227 Slot use and loss. 93.101 Applicability 93.103 Helicopter operations. Subpart T—Ronald Reagan Washington Subpart I [Reserved] National Airport Traffic Rules 93.251 Applicability. Subpart J—Lorain County Regional Airport 93.253 Nonstop operations. Traffic Rule Subpart U—Special Flight Rules in the Vi- 93.117 Applicability. 93.119 Aircraft operations. cinity of Grand Canyon National Park, AZ Subpart K—High Density Traffic Airports 93.301 Applicability. 93.121 Applicability. 93.303 Definitions. 93.123 High density traffic airports. 93.305 Flight-free zones and flight corridors. 93.125 Arrival or departure reservation. 93.307 Minimum flight altitudes. 93.129 Additional operations. 93.309 General operating procedures. 93.130 Suspension of allocations. 93.311 Minimum terrain clearance. 93.133 Exceptions. 93.313 Communications. 93.315 Requirements for commercial Special Subpart L [Reserved] Flight Rules Area operations. 93.316 [Reserved] Subpart M—Ketchikan International Airport 93.317 Commercial Special Flight Rules Traffic Rule Area operation curfew. 93.319 Commercial air tour limitations. 93.151 Applicability. 93.321 Transfer and termination of alloca- 93.152 Description of area. tions. 93.153 Communications. 93.323 [Reserved] 93.155 Aircraft operations. 93.325 Quarterly reporting. APPENDIX TO SUBPART U OF PART 93—SPECIAL Subpart N—Pearson Field (Vancouver, WA) FLIGHT RULES IN THE VICINITY OF THE Airport Traffic Rule GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK, AZ APPENDIX A TO SUBPART U OF PART 93— 93.161 Applicability. GCNP QUIET AIRCRAFT TECHNOLOGY DES- 93.162 Description of area. IGNATION 93.163 Aircraft operations. Subpart V—Washington, DC Metropolitan Subpart O—Special Flight Rules in the Area Special Flight Rules Area Vicinity of Luke AFB, AZ 93.331 Purpose and applicability of this sub- 93.175 Applicability. part. 93.176 Description of area. 93.333 Failure to comply with this subpart. 874 VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:36 May 19, 2021 Jkt 253047 PO 00000 Frm 00884 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\14\14V2.TXT PC31 kpayne on VMOFRWIN702 with $$_JOB Federal Aviation Administration, DOT § 93.53 93.335 Definitions. § 93.53 Description of area. 93.337 Requirements for operating in the DC SFRA. The Anchorage, Alaska, Terminal 93.339 Requirements for operating in the DC Area is designated as that airspace ex- SFRA, including the DC FRZ. tending upward from the surface to the 93.341 Aircraft operations in the DC FRZ. upper limit of each of the segments de- 93.343 Requirements for aircraft operations scribed in § 93.55. It is bounded by a line to or from College Park Airport, Poto- mac Airfield, or Washington Executive/ beginning at Point MacKenzie, extend- Hyde Field Airport. ing westerly along the bank of Knik 93.345 VFR outbound procedures for fringe Arm to a point intersecting the 350° airports. bearing from the Anchorage Inter- national ATCT; thence north to inter- Subpart W—New York Class B Airspace cept the 5.2-mile arc centered on the Hudson River and East River Exclusion geographical center of Anchorage, Special Flight Rules Area Alaska, ATCT; thence counter- 93.350 Definitions. clockwise along that arc to its inter- 93.351 General requirements for operating in section with a line bearing 180° from the East River and/or Hudson River Ex- the intersection of the new Seward clusions. Highway and International Airport 93.352 Hudson River Exclusion specific oper- Road; thence due north to O’Malley ating procedures. 93.353 East River Exclusion specific oper- Road; thence east along O’Malley Road ating procedures. to its intersection with Lake Otis Parkway; thence northerly along Lake AUTHORITY: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40109, 40113, 44502, 44514, 44701, 44715, Otis Parkway to its intersection with 44719, 46301. Abbott Road; thence east along Abbott Road to its intersection with Abbott SPECIAL FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION Loop Road; thence north to its inter- NO.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Downloading the Better Data Available in the FMS for All Aircraft Appears to Be Lower
    EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION EUROCONTROL EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE STUDY OF THE ACQUISITION OF DATA FROM AIRCRAFT OPERATORS TO AID TRAJECTORY PREDICTION CALCULATION EEC Note No. 18/98 EEC Task R23 EATCHIP Task ODP.ET5.ST03 Issued: September 1998 The information contained in this document is the property of the EUROCONTROL Agency and no part should be reproduced in any form without the Agency’s permission. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the Agency. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Reference: Security Classification: EEC Note No. 18/98 Unclassified Originator: Originator (Corporate Author) Name/Location: EEC - FDR EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre (Flight Data Research) B.P.15 F - 91222 Brétigny-sur-Orge CEDEX FRANCE Telephone : +33 (0)1 69 88 75 00 Sponsor: Sponsor (Contract Authority) Name/Location: EUROCONTROL Agency Directorate of EATCHIP Development Rue de la Fusée, 96 - Division DED2 (Peter Bailey) B -1130 BRUXELLES Telephone : +32 2 729 3339 TITLE: STUDY OF THE ACQUISITION OF DATA FROM AIRCRAFT OPERATORS TO AID TRAJECTORY PREDICTION CALCULATION Author Date Pages Figures Tables Appendix References G. Mykoniatis, P. Martin 9/98 xii+96 1+59 4+4 7 13 EATCHIP Task EEC Task No. Task No. Sponsor Period Specification R23 ODP-5-E3 1997 to 1998 ODP.ET5.ST03 Distribution Statement: (a) Controlled by: Head of FDR (b) Special Limitations: None (c) Copy to NTIS: YES / NO Descriptors (keywords): trajectory prediction - aircraft operators - airlines - flight plans - data link - take-off weight - route - flight plan data processing Abstract: Several aircraft operators were consulted to determine if they could supply flight data to ATS which would make a significant difference to the trajectories calculated by flight data processing systems, particularly in the initial climb phase.
    [Show full text]
  • 200115 SFRA Course
    Security-related procedures and requirements are a fact of life for today's pilots, especially those who operate in the Washington, DC metropolitan area Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA) and the DC Flight Restricted Zone (FRZ). Although the rules may sound intimidating, they are not difficult. This course is intended to provide the information you need to fly safely, correctly, and confidently in this airspace. 1 This slide provides a summary of the changes made since the last version of this course. The only changes for this edition are new procedures for filing flight plans for the Flight Restricted Zone, or FRZ. As stated in the regulatory review section, 14 CFR 91.161 requires this training for pilots flying under visual flight rules (VFR) within a 60 nm radius of the Washington DC VOR/DME. This training is a one-time-only requirement, but it is a good idea to periodically review the material for updates and to refresh your knowledge. You should print the certificate of training completion. You do not have to carry it with you, but you must provide it within a reasonable period of time if requested. Now, let’s get started. 2 After the September 11 terrorist attacks, security authorities established the Washington DC Air Defense Identification Zone – the ADIZ – and the Flight Restricted Zone – the FRZ – to protect the nation’s capital. The ADIZ and the FRZ were established and operated via temporary flight restriction, or TFR, until the FAA developed a final rule that took effect on February 17, 2009. That rule codified the ADIZ and the FRZ in 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 93 as the DC Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA).
    [Show full text]
  • Flying the Line Flying the Line the First Half Century of the Air Line Pilots Association
    Flying the Line Flying the Line The First Half Century of the Air Line Pilots Association By George E. Hopkins The Air Line Pilots Association Washington, DC International Standard Book Number: 0-9609708-1-9 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 82-073051 © 1982 by The Air Line Pilots Association, Int’l., Washington, DC 20036 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America First Printing 1982 Second Printing 1986 Third Printing 1991 Fourth Printing 1996 Fifth Printing 2000 Sixth Printing 2007 Seventh Printing 2010 CONTENTS Chapter 1: What’s a Pilot Worth? ............................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Stepping on Toes ...................................................................... 9 Chapter 3: Pilot Pushing .......................................................................... 17 Chapter 4: The Airmail Pilots’ Strike of 1919 ........................................... 23 Chapter 5: The Livermore Affair .............................................................. 30 Chapter 6: The Trouble with E. L. Cord .................................................. 42 Chapter 7: The Perils of Washington ........................................................ 53 Chapter 8: Flying for a Rogue Airline ....................................................... 67 Chapter 9: The Rise and Fall of the TWA Pilots Association .................... 78 Chapter 10: Dave Behncke—An American Success Story ......................... 92 Chapter 11: Wartime.............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Note for Amendment LCO 10024
    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 Hartford, CT 06106 (860) 240-0200 http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa sHB-5586 AN ACT CONCERNING THE EXPANSION OF THE CRISIS INITIATIVE PILOT PROGRAM THROUGHOUT THE STATE AND THE EMERGENCY INTERVENTION BY A POLICE OFFICER WHEN A PERSON SUFFERS AN OPIOID OVERDOSE. AMENDMENT LCO No.: 10024 File Copy No.: 377 House Calendar No.: 290 OFA Fiscal Note State Impact: Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 22 $ FY 23 $ Mental Health & Addiction Serv., GF - Cost 96,300 99,200 Dept. State Comptroller - Fringe GF - Cost 39,800 41,000 Benefits1 Department of Emergency GF - Cost Up to See Below Services and Public Protection 160,000 Note: GF=General Fund Municipal Impact: None Explanation The amendment strikes the underlying bill and its associated fiscal impact resulting in the following impact. Section 1 results in a cost to the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (DMHAS) of approximately $96,300 in FY 22 and FY $99,200 in 23 (with associated fringe costs of $39,800 and $41,000, respectively) to support an additional social worker at Troop D. 1The fringe benefit costs for most state employees are budgeted centrally in accounts administered by the Comptroller. The estimated active employee fringe benefit cost associated with most personnel changes is 41.3% of payroll in FY 22 and FY 23. Primary Analyst: ME 6/4/21 Contributing Analyst(s): () 2021HB-05586-R00LCO10024-FNA.DOCX Page 2 of 2 Currently, one DMHAS social worker assists state police at Troop E in de-escalating situations involving individuals with mental illness and ensures access to follow-up services.
    [Show full text]
  • Murder-Suicide Ruled in Shooting a Homicide-Suicide Label Has Been Pinned on the Deaths Monday Morning of an Estranged St
    -* •* J 112th Year, No: 17 ST. JOHNS, MICHIGAN - THURSDAY, AUGUST 17, 1967 2 SECTIONS - 32 PAGES 15 Cents Murder-suicide ruled in shooting A homicide-suicide label has been pinned on the deaths Monday morning of an estranged St. Johns couple whose divorce Victims had become, final less than an hour before the fatal shooting. The victims of the marital tragedy were: *Mrs Alice Shivley, 25, who was shot through the heart with a 45-caliber pistol bullet. •Russell L. Shivley, 32, who shot himself with the same gun minutes after shooting his wife. He died at Clinton Memorial Hospital about 1 1/2 hqurs after the shooting incident. The scene of the tragedy was Mrsy Shivley's home at 211 E. en name, Alice Hackett. Lincoln Street, at the corner Police reconstructed the of Oakland Street and across events this way. Lincoln from the Federal-Mo­ gul plant. It happened about AFTER LEAVING court in the 11:05 a.m. Monday. divorce hearing Monday morn­ ing, Mrs Shivley —now Alice POLICE OFFICER Lyle Hackett again—was driven home French said Mr Shivley appar­ by her mother, Mrs Ruth Pat­ ently shot himself just as he terson of 1013 1/2 S. Church (French) arrived at the home Street, Police said Mrs Shlv1 in answer to a call about a ley wanted to pick up some shooting phoned in fromtheFed- papers at her Lincoln Street eral-Mogul plant. He found Mr home. Shivley seriously wounded and She got out of the car and lying on the floor of a garage went in the front door* Mrs MRS ALICE SHIVLEY adjacent to -• the i house on the Patterson got out of-'the car east side.
    [Show full text]
  • The Outcome of ATC Message Length and Complexity on En Route Pilot Readback Performance
    DOT/FAA/AM-09/2 Office of Aerospace Medicine Washington, DC 20591 The Outcome of ATC Message Length and Complexity on En Route Pilot Readback Performance O. Veronika Prinzo Civil Aerospace Medical Institute Federal Aviation Administration Oklahoma City, OK 73125 A.M. Hendrix R. Hendrix Hendrix & Hendrix Roswell, NM 88201 January 2009 Final Report OK-09-0434 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents thereof. ___________ This publication and all Office of Aerospace Medicine technical reports are available in full-text from the Civil Aerospace Medical Institute’s publications Web site: www.faa.gov/library/reports/medical/oamtechreports/index.cfm Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. DOT/FAA/AM-09/2 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date The outcome of ATC message length and complexity on en route pilot January 2009 6. Performing Organization Code readback performance 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. 1 2 2 Prinzo OV, Hendrix AM, Hendrix R 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) 1FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute 2Hendrix & Hendrix P.O. Box 25082 Oklahoma City, OK 15 Circle Drive 11. Contract or Grant No. 73125 Roswell, NM 88201 12. Sponsoring Agency name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Office of Aerospace Medicine Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplemental Notes This work was performed under Task AM-B-06-HRR-516.
    [Show full text]
  • Fringe Season 1 Transcripts
    PROLOGUE Flight 627 - A Contagious Event (Glatterflug Airlines Flight 627 is enroute from Hamburg, Germany to Boston, Massachusetts) ANNOUNCEMENT: ... ist eingeschaltet. Befestigen sie bitte ihre Sicherheitsgürtel. ANNOUNCEMENT: The Captain has turned on the fasten seat-belts sign. Please make sure your seatbelts are securely fastened. GERMAN WOMAN: Ich möchte sehen wie der Film weitergeht. (I would like to see the film continue) MAN FROM DENVER: I don't speak German. I'm from Denver. GERMAN WOMAN: Dies ist mein erster Flug. (this is my first flight) MAN FROM DENVER: I'm from Denver. ANNOUNCEMENT: Wir durchfliegen jetzt starke Turbulenzen. Nehmen sie bitte ihre Plätze ein. (we are flying through strong turbulence. please return to your seats) INDIAN MAN: Hey, friend. It's just an electrical storm. MORGAN STEIG: I understand. INDIAN MAN: Here. Gum? MORGAN STEIG: No, thank you. FLIGHT ATTENDANT: Mein Herr, sie müssen sich hinsetzen! (sir, you must sit down) Beruhigen sie sich! (calm down!) Beruhigen sie sich! (calm down!) Entschuldigen sie bitte! Gehen sie zu ihrem Sitz zurück! [please, go back to your seat!] FLIGHT ATTENDANT: (on phone) Kapitän! Wir haben eine Notsituation! (Captain, we have a difficult situation!) PILOT: ... gibt eine Not-... (... if necessary...) Sprechen sie mit mir! (talk to me) Was zum Teufel passiert! (what the hell is going on?) Beruhigen ... (...calm down...) Warum antworten sie mir nicht! (why don't you answer me?) Reden sie mit mir! (talk to me) ACT I Turnpike Motel - A Romantic Interlude OLIVIA: Oh my god! JOHN: What? OLIVIA: This bed is loud. JOHN: You think? OLIVIA: We can't keep doing this.
    [Show full text]
  • FLIGHT PLAN DATA .// L.'- and FLIGHT SCHEDULING ACCURACY Q .~
    • REPORT NO. DOT-TSC-FAA-72-10 ~ I (.0 l'- ~ A SURVEY TO DETERMINE ~ FLIGHT PLAN DATA .// l.'- AND FLIGHT SCHEDULING ACCURACY Q .~ JOHN R. COONAN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CENTER 55 BROADWAY CAMBRIDGE, MA. 02142 transpoS . u. S. Internati ona I Transportati on Exposi ti on Dulles International Airport Washington, D.C. :~ . JANUARY 1972 May 27-June 4, 1972 . TECHNICAL REPORT . .. Availability is Unlimited. Document may be Released To the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22151. for Sale to the Public. Prepared for , DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20591 • The contents of this report reflect the views of the Transportation Systems Center which is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. 1. Report No. 12. Government Acce ..ion No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No, DOT-TSC-FAA-72-l0 4. Ti tie and Subtitle 5. Report Date A SURVEY TO DETERMINE FLIGHT PLAN January 1972 DATA AND FLIGHT SCHEDULE ACCURACY 6. Performing Orgonization Code 8. Performing Organi zatian Report No. 7. Author(s) John R. Coonan 9. PerfQrming Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Department of Transportation R2l37 Transportation Systems Center 11. Contract or Grant No. FA206 55 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02142 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Addr.ss Technical Department of Transportation Report Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. 20590 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter: 2. En Route Operations
    Chapter 2 En Route Operations Introduction The en route phase of flight is defined as that segment of flight from the termination point of a departure procedure to the origination point of an arrival procedure. The procedures employed in the en route phase of flight are governed by a set of specific flight standards established by 14 CFR [Figure 2-1], FAA Order 8260.3, and related publications. These standards establish courses to be flown, obstacle clearance criteria, minimum altitudes, navigation performance, and communications requirements. 2-1 fly along the centerline when on a Federal airway or, on routes other than Federal airways, along the direct course between NAVAIDs or fixes defining the route. The regulation allows maneuvering to pass well clear of other air traffic or, if in visual meteorogical conditions (VMC), to clear the flightpath both before and during climb or descent. Airways Airway routing occurs along pre-defined pathways called airways. [Figure 2-2] Airways can be thought of as three- dimensional highways for aircraft. In most land areas of the world, aircraft are required to fly airways between the departure and destination airports. The rules governing airway routing, Standard Instrument Departures (SID) and Standard Terminal Arrival (STAR), are published flight procedures that cover altitude, airspeed, and requirements for entering and leaving the airway. Most airways are eight nautical miles (14 kilometers) wide, and the airway Figure 2-1. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 14 Aeronautics and Space. flight levels keep aircraft separated by at least 500 vertical En Route Navigation feet from aircraft on the flight level above and below when operating under VFR.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA ICAO Flight Planning Interface Reference Guide Version 2.1
    En Route and Oceanic Services Aeronautical Information and Flight Planning Enhancements FAA ICAO Flight Planning Interface Reference Guide Version 2.1 Federal Aviation Administration November 15, 2012 Air Traffic Organization En Route and Oceanic Services, ATO-E Technical Performance Support Group , AJE- 36 FAA ICAO Flight Planning Interface Reference Guide Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Scope ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Background ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 FAA FPL Services ...................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Document Organization ........................................................................................... 8 2. Operational Use of Flight Planning Messages .......................................................................... 8 2.1 Initial FPL Filing ........................................................................................................ 8 2.1.1 Flights Remaining Entirely within U.S. Domestic Airspace ............................... 8 2.1.2 Flights Leaving U.S. Domestic Airspace ................................................................ 9 2.1.3 Flights Entering U.S. Domestic Airspace (from or Through
    [Show full text]
  • Fringe Benefits-3Rd Qtr. 2020
    XX. Qualified Transportation Plans XVIII-XIX. [Reserved] XX. Qualified Transportation Plans A. Overview M. How Does a Pre-Tax Compensation Reduction Plan Compare With FSAs B. Who Can Sponsor and Who Can Offered Under a Pre-Tax Salary Participate in a Qualified Transportation Reduction Plan? Plan? N. How Do Employees (and Employers) Save C. What Types of Transportation Fringe on Taxes With a Pre-Tax Compensation Benefits May Be Offered in General? Reduction Plan? D. Qualified Parking O. Compensation Reduction Elections E. Transit Passes P. Carryovers Allowed for Current F. Vanpooling Participants; Former Participants Cannot Have Unused Amounts Refunded G. Bicycle Commuting Reimbursement Q. Expense Substantiation and Other H. How to Administer the Statutory Limits Requirements for Cash Reimbursements I. Plan Design Choices and Documents R. Are There Any Reporting and Disclosure Needed to Establish and Administer Obligations? a Plan S. How Are Other Benefits Affected by a J. Plan Design #1: Employer Gives Away Qualified Transportation Plan? Transportation Fringe Benefits; No Choice (the Giveaway Plan) T. Deduction Limits and Other Laws Affecting Qualified Transportation Plans K. Plan Design #2: Employees Have Choice Between Compensation and U. Consequences of Noncompliance Transportation Fringe Benefits (the Pre- V. Correcting Mistakes Tax Compensation Reduction Plan) W. Other Special Design and Administration L. Plan Design #3: Combination Giveaway Issues Plan With Pre-Tax Compensation X. Finding the Applicable Laws (and Other Reductions and/or Cash-Outs Useful Information) Regarding Transportation Fringe Benefits A. Overview This Section discusses the tax treatment of qualified transportation fringe benefits that are made available to employees by their employers under Code § 132(f).
    [Show full text]
  • SECTION IV: Project Proposals 4.1 Abstract
    SECTION IV: Project Proposals 4.1 Abstract To address the needs of the El Paso ISD community, the district proposes a balanced strategy with vertical alignment to serve the academic, and social and emotional wellbeing of students and staff. Targeted services for elementary populations include professional development (PD) for elementary school staff to implement differentiated learning strategies that address the variable needs of students along with comprehensive tutoring for RTI. Specialized PD will be provided to all campus teachers, instructional coaches, and administrators to better understand specific learning losses and how to differentiate for students, per their individual needs, to include SEL support. These sessions will also provide training to develop plans on differentiated student support. Three to five long-term subs will be hired at each campus to assist with coverage for teachers to plan and support teachers and teams with pull-outs/push-in efforts. These permanent campus subs will be included in PLCs, trainings and other supports to ensure high quality coverage of classes and groups. Substitutes will allow teachers to plan, assess data, and adjust instruction. Tutors will assist with RTI in the form of small groups and will assist teachers enabling staff to reach more students in greater depth. To compliment academic PD, El Paso ISD will also offer positive culture building and customer service PD to improve the districts relationship with internal stakeholders and external partners. Afterschool community learning centers will be placed in the schools with the largest gaps in learning loss. These after school community learning centers will model the 21st Century Community Learning Centers that align with the Every Student Succeeds Act.
    [Show full text]