2017 Friends of the University of Montana Herbarium Newsletter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2017 Friends of the University of Montana Herbarium Newsletter University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Newsletters of the Friends of the University of Montana Herbarium Herbarium at the University of Montana Spring 2017 2017 Friends of The University of Montana Herbarium Newsletter Peter Lesica Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/herbarium_newsletters Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Lesica, Peter, "2017 Friends of The University of Montana Herbarium Newsletter" (2017). Newsletters of the Friends of the University of Montana Herbarium. 22. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/herbarium_newsletters/22 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the Herbarium at the University of Montana at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Newsletters of the Friends of the University of Montana Herbarium by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FRIENDS Of The University Of Montana HERBARIUM Spring 2017 WHERE ARE ALL THE MONTANA MOSSES? Joe C. Elliott The Flora of North America (FNA) Volumes 27 and subsequent growth of the sporophyte. Boreal habitats tend to be 28 includes 1,415 species of North American mosses, of which cool and moist, which is compatible with the cool-season pho- more than 500 taxa (i.e., species, subspecies, and varieties) have tosynthetic physiology of mosses and their need for water in the been recorded in Montana. Encompassing two floristic prov- reproductive process. The circumboreal distribution on several inces, Cordilleran and Great Plains, and bordering the Boreal continents is probably a result of highly mobile spores that are Province, Montana has a rich moss flora created by habitat di- very small and easily carried in wind, much like pollen. Trans- versity that reflects the ecological integration of elevation, sub- port over large expanses of ocean, between continents, does not strate, climate, and glaciation. Species associated with the three appear to have posed a significant barrier to this large group of floristic provinces occur in Montana where ecological condi- mosses. tions are typical of the province over its geographic range. For Thirty percent of Montana moss species are most often found example, many species with affinities for the conifer forest of in the North American Cordilleran Province that extends from western Montana (Cordilleran and Boreal species) are also pre- Alaska south to California and Arizona, compared to 45 percent sent in the isolated mountain ranges of central Montana where of Montana’s vascular plants. Approximately 14 percent of the montane environment is cooler and wet- mosses are mostly restricted to the Pacific Northwest part of the ter than the surrounding prairie and steppe. Tetraplodon mnioides Cordilleran Province. Species of cosmopolitan The biogeography of mosses and vascular mosses and vascular plants comprise similar plants differ in that mosses tend to have proportions of the Montana flora. Cosmopoli- wider ranges of distribution, often including tan mosses include a group of mosses that are several continents in both hemispheres, with “weedy” and colonize disturbed soils and bare many species being cosmopolitan. More rock, concrete, and roofs. One of these is the than 75 percent of families of bryophytes are tiny, silvery Bryum argenteum , the “sidewalk moss,” that is ubiquitous in sidewalk cracks widespread in both hemispheres, with more D. Bartonby than half of the North American species also throughout Missoula. occurring outside of this continent. Like Mosses differ from vascular plants in having vascular plants, mosses exhibit one of three lower levels of endemism, which is probably patterns of distribution: widespread in sev- due to the long distance dispersal capacity of eral floristic provinces (cosmopolitan), dis- moss spores. Peaks of endemic richness of continuous among floristic provinces North American moss flora are in northern (disjunct), and restricted to a floristic prov- California, the Pacific Northwest, and in the ince or part of a floristic province (endemic). southern Appalachians. Montana has only two Information in the FNA and Manual of species of mosses that are narrow endemics Montana Vascular Plants (2012) indicates (restricted to small areas within a floristic prov- differences in biogeography between Mon- ince). Grimmia brittoniae was first collected in tana mosses and vascular plants (Table 1, Bad Rock Canyon near Columbia Falls by R.S. page 3). Differences between mosses and Williams in 1897, and was rediscovered at the vascular plants are most pronounced in floristic affinities that same site in 1997. This rare moss, growing on rock faces that they demonstrate for the Boreal and North American Cordil- are wet in spring, has been documented from 49 locations in leran provinces. Most Montana mosses (34 percent) are cir- western Montana and adjacent Idaho. Drepanocladus cardoti- cumboreal, with only about 1 percent being restricted to North tii , perhaps the rarest Montana moss, was collected from Ava- American boreal habitats. The relatively large proportion of lanche Basin in Glacier National Park in 1898, and has not been boreal mosses is probably associated with their mode of repro- found anywhere in the World since the collection of the type duction, which requires that antheridia and archegonia be con- specimen. nected through a film of moisture to allow fertilization and (Continued on page 3) Notes from the Board Friends One way or another it all boils down to politics. Given the re- of the University of Montana cent political machinations regarding Russian intrusion into our election process, I asked myself, why would the Russians stop at Herbarium a mere election? Could they not subvert our world of botanical systematics? And sure enough, there was the proof of Soviet meddling resting right in our precious MONTU herbarium. Her- Division of barium sheets of winterfat, a prime winter browse of proud Biological Sciences American sheep, had been annotated Krascheninnikovia lanata , University of ostensibly relegating Eurotia and Ceratoides to the dustbin of his- Montana tory and elevating a Soviet moniker. What is next—Takhtajania Missoula, MT 59812 tridentata or Putinia tridentata for sagebrush? One can see where this infamy might go. But since our president and President Putin The Mission of the are such good buddies, I worry that an infusion of capital into the Friends is to secure nation’s herbaria may not be high on President Trump’s to-do list support for and to of projects to “make America great again.” enrich the What MONTU lacks to effectively fulfill its mission is more collections and cabinet space, and for significant cost effectiveness at least 10-14 operations of cabinets are needed. I have spent many hours in three herbaria: The UM Herbarium University of New York at Albany, Washington State University, ————————————————————— and the herbarium at Missoula’s Forestry Sciences Lab. I was in the process of becoming a plant ecologist. To be credible, a plant Board of Directors ecologist must be certain of the identification of all specimens and the best test of an accurate identification is to compare one’s de- Steve Cooper terminations to herbarium specimens, particularly annotated Dave Hanna specimens. The herbaria at the afore-cited institutions were Pete Husby housed in windowless, florescent-lit basements resembling cata- Jessie Salix combs with their cheerless ambiance. In contrast, the University of Montana Herbarium (MONTU) is a breath of fresh air with a Scott Mincemoyer, president prime location, natural lighting, a splendid view of campus, win- Shannon Kimball, secretary, dows that open, and is generally well-equipped for its mission, ex officio board member but for this one problem of cabinet space. Herbarium maven Shannon Kimball is proposing some stop-gap The Friends Newsletter measures that call for considerable sacrifice on her part as well as Edited by that of office-mate Marilyn Marler. Making MONTU great again Peter Lesica will require sacrifice from all of its supporters. For my part, I will Layout & Copy Editing by be trying to annotate specimens I collected some time ago and Drake Barton and Kathy Lloyd which Peter Stickney pronounced “nice” (pretty high praise from Peter). Perhaps the accumulation of specimens lacking appropri- ate housing will be a spur to university administrators to conse- 2017 FOH Annual Meeting crate space to its greatest use, an expanded, really “huge, huge” herbarium. Until then we are hoping that the Friends of the UM The annual business meeting of the Friends of Herbarium will step up to the plate again. To this end, President the UM Herbarium will be held Saturday, No- Trump has promised to float one of his signature Tweets for every vember 18 from 10 AM to 2:00 PM. The meeting $100 we raise. Let the contributions flow. will be held in Rm. 202 of the Natural Sciences Steve Cooper Building on the UM Campus. This is the annual meeting of the Board of Directors and is open to the membership. Page 2 ...Moss (Continued from page 1) stygium ), dung of forest carnivores ( Tetraplodon angustatus Twenty-five species of moss are regional endemics with cen- and T. mnioides ), and soils enriched with metals ( Haplodontium ters of distribution in the Pacific Northwest and reach Montana macrocarpum ). Rich fen habitats are present where cold water, on the eastern edge of their range. These mosses include four
Recommended publications
  • Fossil Mosses: What Do They Tell Us About Moss Evolution?
    Bry. Div. Evo. 043 (1): 072–097 ISSN 2381-9677 (print edition) DIVERSITY & https://www.mapress.com/j/bde BRYOPHYTEEVOLUTION Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2381-9685 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/bde.43.1.7 Fossil mosses: What do they tell us about moss evolution? MicHAEL S. IGNATOV1,2 & ELENA V. MASLOVA3 1 Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 2 Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 3 Belgorod State University, Pobedy Square, 85, Belgorod, 308015 Russia �[email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1520-042X * author for correspondence: �[email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-6315 Abstract The moss fossil records from the Paleozoic age to the Eocene epoch are reviewed and their putative relationships to extant moss groups discussed. The incomplete preservation and lack of key characters that could define the position of an ancient moss in modern classification remain the problem. Carboniferous records are still impossible to refer to any of the modern moss taxa. Numerous Permian protosphagnalean mosses possess traits that are absent in any extant group and they are therefore treated here as an extinct lineage, whose descendants, if any remain, cannot be recognized among contemporary taxa. Non-protosphagnalean Permian mosses were also fairly diverse, representing morphotypes comparable with Dicranidae and acrocarpous Bryidae, although unequivocal representatives of these subclasses are known only since Cretaceous and Jurassic. Even though Sphagnales is one of two oldest lineages separated from the main trunk of moss phylogenetic tree, it appears in fossil state regularly only since Late Cretaceous, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Ecology of Eriophorum Latifolium, a Clonal Species in Rich Fen Vegetation
    Anders Lyngstad Population Ecology of Eriophorum latifolium, a Clonal Species in Rich Fen Vegetation Thesis for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor Trondheim, October 2010 Norwegian University of Science and Technology Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology Department of Biology NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology Thesis for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology Department of Biology © Anders Lyngstad ISBN 978-82-471-2332-4 (printed ver.) ISBN 978-82-471-2333-1 (electronic ver.) ISSN 1503-8181 Doctoral theses at NTNU, 2010:179 Printed by NTNU-trykk Synopsis PREFACE It was the spring of 2005, and it was the right time to move onwards. A position as a research fellow working with long-term time series at the Museum of Natural History and Archaeology at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) was announced, and a PhD-project was developed with the studies of former haymaking lands at Sølendet and Tågdalen nature reserves as a starting point. Work began in earnest in January 2006, and continued at an ever increasing pace until July 2010, when all the parts of the thesis were finally completed and assembled. The study was financed by NTNU, and was carried out at the Museum of Natural History and Archaeology and the Institute of Biology, both NTNU. I am deeply grateful to my main supervisor Professor Asbjørn Moen at the Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, and my co-supervisor Associate Professor Bård Pedersen at the Institute of Biology. This project rests on the long-term studies of rich hayfens that were initiated by Asbjørn 40 years ago, and that are still ongoing, much due to his continuous effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]
  • (Bryopsida: Splachnaceae). Lily Roberta Lewis University of Connecticut, [email protected]
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Doctoral Dissertations University of Connecticut Graduate School 5-7-2015 Resolving Amphitropical Phylogeographic Histories in the Common Dung Moss Tetraplodon (Bryopsida: Splachnaceae). Lily Roberta Lewis University of Connecticut, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Lewis, Lily Roberta, "Resolving Amphitropical Phylogeographic Histories in the Common Dung Moss Tetraplodon (Bryopsida: Splachnaceae)." (2015). Doctoral Dissertations. 747. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/747 Resolving Amphitropical Phylogeographic Histories in the Common Dung Moss Tetraplodon (Bryopsida: Splachnaceae). Lily Roberta Lewis, PhD University of Connecticut, 2015 Many plants have geographic disjunctions, with one of the more rare, yet extreme being the amphitropical, or bipolar disjunction. Bryophytes (namely mosses and liverworts) exhibit this pattern more frequently relative to other groups of plants and typically at or below the level of species. The processes that have shaped the amphitropical disjunction have been infrequently investigated, with notably a near absence of studies focusing on mosses. This dissertation explores the amphitropical disjunction in the dung moss Tetraplodon, with a special emphasis on the origin of the southernmost South American endemic T. fuegianus. Chapter 1 delimits three major lineages within Tetraplodon with distinct yet overlapping geographic ranges, including an amphitropical lineage containing the southernmost South American endemic T. fuegianus. Based on molecular divergence date estimation and phylogenetic topology, the American amphitropical disjunction is traced to a single direct long-distance dispersal event across the tropics. Chapter 2 provides the first evidence supporting the role of migratory shore birds in dispersing bryophytes, as well as other plant, fungal, and algal diaspores across the tropics.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW LOCALITIES of SOME RARE FEN BRYOPHYTE SPECIES in BELARUS Nové Lokality Vzácných Slatinných Mechorostů V Bělorusku
    BRYONORA / 61 (2018) NEW LOCALITIES OF SOME RARE FEN BRYOPHYTE SPECIES IN BELARUS Nové lokality vzácných slatinných mechorostů v Bělorusku Petra Hájková1,2, Michal Hájek1, Oleg Maslovsky3, Paweł Pawlikow- ski4, Marina Abramchuk5, Andrei Abramchuk5, Daniel Dítě6 & Zuza- na Plesková1 1Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 267/2, CZ-611 37 Brno, e-mail: [email protected]; 2Laboratory of Paleoecology, Botanical Institute, Czech Academy of Science, Lidická 25/27, CZ-602 00 Brno; 3Institute of Experimental Botany, Belarus National Academy of Sciences, Akademycheskaya 27, Minsk, 220073, Belarus; 4Department of Plant Ecology and Environmental Conservation, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Żwirki i Wigury 101, 02096 Warsaw, Poland; 5Brest Regional Branch of APB – Birdlife Belarus, Narochanskaya 5, 224028 Brest, Belarus; 6Institute of Botany, Plant Science and Biodiversity Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-845 23 Bratislava, Slovak Republic. Abstract: Bryophyte species occurring in calcium-rich fens are endangered and retreating in all European countries, including those in Northern Europe, because of fen degradation in intensively exploited landscapes. During our field investigation of mires in northwestern Belarus in July 2017, we discovered new localities of some rare fen bryophyte species. They are included as endangered in the Red Book of Belarus (Cinclidium stygium, Drepanocladus lycopodioides and Meesia triquetra) or have been retreating in the last decades (Hamatocaulis vernicosus, Helodium blandowii, Paludella squarrosa, Scorpidium cossonii and S. scorpioides). Knowledge about their recent distribution is a prerequisite for their active protection by nature conservation authorities. Key words: endangered bryophytes, calcium-rich fens, mires, red-list species, glacial relicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryoflora of the Finnish-Russian Nature Reserve Friendship
    Bryoflora of the Finnish-Russian Nature Reserve Friendship Margarita Boychuk Institute of Biology, Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushkinskaya 11, 185610 Petrozavodsk, Karelia, Russia Introduction The Nature Reserve Friendship (70500 ha) is situated in the north taiga sub-zone (64°10'- 64°40' N - 29°30'-30°30' E) on the both sides of Russian-Finnish state (Fig. 1). It consists of Kostomuksha Strict Nature Reserve (KSNR) on the Russian side and five Nature Reserves on the Finnish side (FNR): Ulvinsalo, Elimyssalo, Lentua, Iso-Palonen - Maa- riansärkät and Juortanansalo. Fig.1. Outline map of the Nature Reserve Friendship and bryology investigation plots. 1.Kosto- muksha Strict Nature Reserve (48000 ha) 2.Juortanansalo-Lapinsuo Mire Reserve (3700 ha) 3.Iso-Palonen and Maariansärkät Nature Reserve (3900 ha) 4.Lentua Nature Reserve (5100 ha) 5.Elimyssalo Nature Reserve (7300 ha) 6.Ulvinsalo Strict Nature Reserve (2500 ha) ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ The Finnish Environment 485 ○○○○○○○○○○○ 155 Bryoflora of the Nature Reserve Friendship has not been studied earlier. A few data on mosses of the park and vicinities of the Kostomuksha town is available in a number of publications (Wainio 1878, Brotherus 1923, Þðêîâñêàÿ 1974, Åëèíà & Êóçíåöîâ 1977, Mäkirinta et al. 1997, Heikkilä et al. 1997). Materials and methods During 1995-1998 bryofloristic investigations were carried out in the territory of Natu- re Reserve Friendship (Fig. 1): in KSNR and in two FNR’s (Juortanansalo-Lapinsuo and Elimyssalo). In the same period, bryophyte flora in the surroundings of Kostomuksha was studied. Field investigations were conducted by a route method. 1016 moss samp- les were collected.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Biodiversity Assessment
    310 Arctic Biodiversity Assessment Purple saxifrage Saxifraga oppositifolia is a very common plant in poorly vegetated areas all over the high Arctic. It even grows on Kaffeklubben Island in N Greenland, at 83°40’ N, the most northerly plant locality in the world. It is one of the first plants to flower in spring and serves as the territorial flower of Nunavut in Canada. Zackenberg 2003. Photo: Erik Thomsen. 311 Chapter 9 Plants Lead Authors Fred J.A. Daniëls, Lynn J. Gillespie and Michel Poulin Contributing Authors Olga M. Afonina, Inger Greve Alsos, Mora Aronsson, Helga Bültmann, Stefanie Ickert-Bond, Nadya A. Konstantinova, Connie Lovejoy, Henry Väre and Kristine Bakke Westergaard Contents Summary ..............................................................312 9.4. Algae ..............................................................339 9.1. Introduction ......................................................313 9.4.1. Major algal groups ..........................................341 9.4.2. Arctic algal taxonomic diversity and regionality ..............342 9.2. Vascular plants ....................................................314 9.4.2.1. Russia ...............................................343 9.2.1. Taxonomic categories and species groups ....................314 9.4.2.2. Svalbard ............................................344 9.2.2. The Arctic territory and its subdivision .......................315 9.4.2.3. Greenland ...........................................344 9.2.3. The flora of the Arctic ........................................316
    [Show full text]
  • The Biocenotic Value of Slītere National Park, Latvia, with Special Reference to Inter-Dune Mires
    The biocenotic value of Slītere National Park, Latvia, with special reference to inter-dune mires L. Wołejko1, A.P. Grootjans2,3, M. Pakalne4, L. Strazdiņa4, O. Aleksāns4, S. Elshehawi2 and E. Grabowska1 1Westpomeranian Technological University in Szczecin, Poland 2University of Groningen, The Netherlands 3Radboud University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands 4University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia _______________________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY Inter-dune wetlands in Europe harbour many Red List species because they are very nutrient-poor ecosystems. Most of these wetlands are geologically very young and no or little peat formation has occurred. In Slītere National Park the numerous inter-dune wetlands are relatively old, up to 4500 years old, and most mire communities are peat forming and they are well preserved. However, the hydrological systems that have conserved the mires are largely unknown. In the present study we analysed 128 vegetation relevées of dune mires in order to assess the variation in ecological mire types. We also carried out several short-time studies to get an insight into the peat development and hydrological conditions that sustain the mires. We describe peat profiles and measured temperature profiles and electrical conductivity in 26 dune valleys. We distinguished three main vegetation units and ten sub-units, representing various stages in peat formation. Based on electrical conductivity and temperature profiles we hypothesised that the mires were sustained by both local and more regional groundwater flows, of which the latter were possibly disturbed by anthropogenic influences, mainly outside the National Park. The importance of the Park was evaluated by comparing it to species lists of wetlands from all countries bordering the Baltic Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1, Chapter 3-1: Sexuality: Sexual Strategies
    Glime, J. M. and Bisang, I. 2017. Sexuality: Sexual Strategies. Chapt. 3-1. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. 3-1-1 Physiological Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 3 June 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 3-1 SEXUALITY: SEXUAL STRATEGIES JANICE M. GLIME AND IRENE BISANG TABLE OF CONTENTS Expression of Sex ......................................................................................................................................... 3-1-2 Unisexual and Bisexual Taxa ........................................................................................................................ 3-1-2 Sex Chromosomes ................................................................................................................................. 3-1-6 An unusual Y Chromosome ................................................................................................................... 3-1-7 Gametangial Arrangement ..................................................................................................................... 3-1-8 Origin of Bisexuality in Bryophytes ............................................................................................................ 3-1-11 Monoicy as a Derived/Advanced Character? ........................................................................................ 3-1-11 Multiple Reversals ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklists of Bryophytes and Lichens Cape Prince of Wales, Alaska, U.S.A
    Annotated Checklists of Bryophytes and Lichens Cape Prince of Wales, Alaska, U.S.A. by JoAnn W. Flock, Museum Associate, University of Colorado Herbarium Version 1, May 10, 2011 Cape Prince of Wales, from Cape Mountain Photo by Tass Kelso Location of the study area on the tip of the Seward Peninsula on the west coast of Alaska. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA ..................................................................................... 3 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF BRYOPHYTES ....................................................................... 4 MOSSES ..................................................................................................................................... 4 LIVERWORTS ......................................................................................................................... 14 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF LICHENS ............................................................................... 16 REFERENCES TO LICHEN COLLECTIONS AND EXPEDITIONS IN ALASKA- CANADA ................................................................................................................................. 29 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... 30 INTRODUCTION In June 1978, I had the good fortune to spend two weeks at Cape Prince of Wales on the western tip of Alaska's Seward Peninsula
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Appendix
    1 SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIX Timing and cause of mid-Holocene mammoth extinction on St. Paul Island, Alaska Russell W. Graham, Soumaya Belmecheri, Kyungcheol Choy, Brendan J. Culleton, Lauren J. Davies, Duane Froese, Peter D. Heintzman, Carrie Hritz, Joshua D. Kapp, Lee Newsom, Ruth Rawcliffe, Émilie Saulnier-Talbot, Beth Shapiro, Yue Wang, John W. Williams, Matthew J. Wooller Table of Contents Supplementary Text…………………………………………………………………………………………….3 S1. St. Paul Island Size reconstruction…………………………………………………… 3 S2. Radiocarbon dating and isotopic analyses of mammoth remains……………………….4 S3. Lake Hill composite core………………………………………………………………..4 S4. Tephra analyses…………………………………………………………………………6 S5. Sedimentary ancient DNA analyses…………………………………………………….6 S6. Coprophilous spores and pollen………………………………………………………..12 S7. Macrobotanical remains………………………………………………………………..14 S8. Diatoms and cladocerans……………………………………………………………….16 S9. Isotopic analyses………………………………………………………..........................18 Figures…………………………………………………………………………………………20 Fig. S1. Map of St. Paul Island……………………………………………………………...20 Fig. S2. Core sites, sections, and overlap in the composite Lake Hill sedimentary record…21 Fig. S3. The age-depth model for the upper 740 cm of the Lake Hill sedimentary record…22 Fig. S4. Major element glass geochemical plots of St. Paul Lake Hill tephra samples…….23 Fig. S5. The proportion of DNA molecules assigned to mammoth…………………..…….24 Fig. S6. DNA damage characterization of reads considered to be mammoth (a-f)…………25 1 2 Fig. S7. Diatom biostratigraphy……………………………………………………………….26 Fig. S8. Cladoceran biostratigraphy…………………………………………………………...27 Fig. S9. C:N ratio of sediment from Lake Hill core vs. calendar years BP……………….......28 Tables…………………………………………………………………………………………….29 Table S1. Radiocarbon dates derived from woolly mammoth fossils found on St. Paul……...29 Table S2. The paleoecological and paleoenvironmental proxies sampled from Lake Hill……30 Table S3. Radiocarbon dates and other age controls reported for constraining the age-depth...31 Table S4.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bryophyte Species List for Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska, with Comments on Several New and Noteworthy Records Author(S): Sarah E
    A Bryophyte Species List for Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska, with Comments on Several New and Noteworthy Records Author(s): Sarah E. Stehn , James K. Walton , Carl A. Roland Source: Evansia, 30(1):31-45. 2013. Published By: The American Bryological and Lichenological Society, Inc. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1639/079.030.0105 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1639/079.030.0105 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/ terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Evansia 30(1) 31 A bryophyte species list for Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska, with comments on several new and noteworthy records Sarah E. Stehn Denali National Park and Preserve and Central Alaska Network National Park Service, P.O. Box 9, Denali Park, AK 99755 E-mail: [email protected] James K. Walton Southwest Alaska Network National Park Service, 240 West 5th Avenue, Anchorage, AK 99501 E-mail: [email protected] Carl A.
    [Show full text]